|
|
|
|
|
Evaluation Framework
Section IV: Logic Model for the State Heart Disease and Stroke
Prevention Program
Logic models are commonly used to graphically depict the organization,
structure, assumptions, and associations underlying a program. Some logic models
are fully descriptive and include all aspects of program structure,
organization, and expected outcomes in addition to a theoretical framework. For
instance, the logic model for the State Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention
Program is based on a socioecological model, which links environmental and
policy systems changes with individual–level behavioral changes (McLeroy et al.,
1988). This logic model depicts relationships and actions that are expected to
precede long-term changes in CVD rates.
It is important to note that logic models are often cyclical rather than linear
in that information obtained during a particular activity can be used to modify
another activity even if that activity precedes it in the logic model. For
example, a state plan for CVH activities influences the development of a work
plan for implementing CVH activities and the work plan can impact
portions of the state plan. Similarly developing the state plan can
affect capacity building activities. Thus the CVH logic model is dynamic with
any number of activities providing input into different aspects of the model.
The feedback loops in the model are the strongest anticipated influences but do
not exhaust all the possible influences.
Logic models not only serve to describe the program, but they also act as a tool
to guide program evaluation. By identifying the steps necessary to reach
intended outcomes, the logic model helps users determine the
program evaluation.
Two logic models have been developed to describe the CVH State Program and its
intended effects. The overview logic model provides a general overview of the
program, and the expanded logic model provides a more detailed description.
These logic models primarily depict the activities and effects intended by CDC
funding to states; however, because CDC may be only one of several funding
sources, the logic model for a particular state’s overall CVH efforts may be
more elaborate than these models. The logic models provide an explanation of how
capacity building, surveillance, and intervention activities are affected by CDC
and state activities.
The overview logic model, shown in Appendix B, depicts the major activities and
intended outcomes of the program. The activities of capacity building,
surveillance, and interventions lead to improved health status through a series
of changes in policies and environments and individual behavior. "System
changes" are defined as those modifications in policy and environments that take
place at the state and community level that affect the population targeted. Once
policies and environmental systems and infrastructure to support heart–healthy
lifestyles are in place, individual behavioral change is more likely to occur.
As a result of these individual behavioral changes, the health status of the
targeted population is expected to improve, leading to a decrease in death and
disability rates and eliminating CVD disparities between the general and
priority populations.
An expanded logic model was developed to elaborate the processes and events that
occur
between the time state activities are implemented and the time changes in long–term
health outcomes can be detected. (See Appendix C.) This model outlines CDC and
state activities in terms of capacity building, surveillance, and interventions.
Both the CDC and state activities are designed to produce short–term outcomes
such as the development of a work plan and strategies for system level changes,
the effective implementation of interventions, and actions by target audiences
and change agents (those who are in the position to influence others). These
outcomes are designed to change policies and environmental factors that lead to behavioral changes and improved health among members of the
target population and ultimately to a decrease death and disability rates and
eliminate CVD disparities between general and priority populations. For
a more detailed explanation of each of the logic models, see
Appendix D.
Date last reviewed:
05/12/2006
Content source: Division for Heart Disease and Stroke
Prevention,
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion |
|
|
|