Skip Navigation
 
Home | About CDC | Media Relations | A-Z Index | Contact Us
   
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention
CDC en Español 
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases  >  Program Guidelines  >  Surveillance and Data Management

Surveillance and Data ManagementProgram Operations Guidelines for STD Prevention
Surveillance and Data Management

Sections on this page:

EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE

The overall purpose of evaluating STD surveillance is to promote the most effective use of health resources. The most important steps in evaluating a surveillance system are a) describing the health events under surveillance; b) stating explicitly the objectives of the system; and c) describing how the system has actually been used to help prevent and control STDs. These three steps begin to evaluate a program's surveillance system properly and help to determine areas where improvement may be needed. The following sections provide more specific information for the proper evaluation of STD surveillance activities. For more detailed information on evaluating surveillance systems, see Guidelines for Evaluating Surveillance, MMWR, May 6, 1988. The surveillance attributes described in the MMWR should be used as the basis for evaluation. Where systems fall short, corrective action is needed until high quality STD surveillance systems are in place.

Recommendation

  • STD prevention programs should evaluate STD surveillance systems at least annually.

Data Quality

All prevalence monitoring programs should have written protocols that specify data quality control procedures. Many Regional Infertility Prevention Programs, for example, already have data quality assurance programs in place to evaluate validity, completeness, and timeliness. Data quality assurance procedures should be documented and the results of data quality assurance activities carefully monitored. Specific surveillance performance indicators, (e.g., reporting lag time), should be established and monitored at regular, defined intervals. Periodically, data quality reports should be distributed to providers and laboratories to provide feedback on reporting performance.

Recommendation

  • STD data quality should be routinely evaluated.

Evaluation of the Reactor Grid

The reactor grid is a tool employed by STD prevention programs to prioritize incoming reactive serologic tests for syphilis (STS). Reactive serologic titers are categorized by age group, sex, and test type or titer levels and are separated for follow-up based on likelihood of yielding a case of untreated, infectious syphilis. They are program specific and may differ from one program to another because they are dependent on current and past epidemiologic trends of syphilis in the local program. Grids should be periodically evaluated to confirm that they remain sufficiently sensitive to ensure that early syphilis cases are not being missed. (See Appendix S-B for example.)

Recommendation

  • STD prevention programs should routinely evaluate the effectiveness and sensitivity of their reactor grid.


Page last modified: August 16, 2007
Page last reviewed: August 16, 2007 Historical Document

Content Source: Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention