WORKFORCE PLANNING

INSTRUCTION MANUAL

APPENDIX

U.S. Department of the Interior

Office of Personnel Policy

 

Workforce planning can be very simple or very complex depending upon the needs of the organization.  It is a multifaceted and dynamic process that requires information from a variety of sources.

Because a “How-To-Guide” cannot be all things to all people, we have provided a brief summary and general information on other processes that are equally important to workforce planning but separate processes.  Each section is intended to be a stand-alone document to be used as appropriate.

Acknowledgement:  We wish to thank the National Institutes of Health (NIH) who’s Workforce Planning Instructional Guide served as the model for this manual. 

August 2001  

 

 

APPENDIX

 

Appendix A -   Sample Workforce Plan

Appendix B -   OMB Budget Requirements

Appendix C -   Glossary of Terms

Appendix D -   References and Sources

Appendix E -    Workload Analysis General Concepts

Appendix F -    Competency/Skills Assessment General Concepts


APPENDIX A  

SAMPLE WORKFORCE PLAN

HUMAN RESOURCE MODEL

Preliminary Preparation

This workforce analysis will be conducted using an example of a Human Resource Management office.  Data used for this model is not from any existing database; it is fictitious data used for demonstration purposes only. We will demonstrate how to determine the future workforce needs for HR, based on anticipated changes in technology, organizational changes, and different skill set needed in the workplace. 

The workforce planning team for this project consists of four employees:

Sinclair Doe, Line-Manager

·        Team leader

·        Jane will lead the workforce plan study and work on the project full-time.

Darius Adams, Management Analyst

·        Analyzing the workforce, statistics, and strategic plans – define future workforce

·        Jill is on detail from the strategic planning office and will devote 95% of her time to this study.

Howard Smith, Personnel Management Specialist

·        Analyzing the strategic plans, researching, and defining the future workforce.  Provide expertise on HR issues.

·        John is assigned to this study on a part-time basis two days a week.

Elizabeth Runnels, Budget Analyst

·        Analyze the resources needed to perform the tasks

·        Kendall is assigned to this study on part-time basis tow days a week.

 

Data Collection Step

Define Scope of DataSimulated Study  

Scope:

This agency is moving toward a HR system that will potentially automate some to of the same functions as current staff.  It’s likely these changes will impact personnel processing units and staff, and the data support branches.  Acquiring these systems may result in more streamlined services and reduction in FTE’s.

This workforce plan will focus on the entire HR function for this agency and will be projected for the next five years.  This study will consider all categories of employment, such as permanent, temporary, non-FTE, contractors and volunteers.  The team will focus minimally on diversity and cultural issues, however statistical information regarding RNO and gender will be reported.

Data will be extracted from FPPS, Data Warehouse, budget reports and strategic planning documents to assist us with the analysis.

Collecting existing documents:

To understand this agency’s vision, mission and workforce dynamics, we have collected and will use the following published documents and reports as a guide for this study:

·        Success Through Human Resources: From Strategy to Action (DOI HRM Strategic Plan)

·        National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Study

·        Projected FTE Report

·        Hackett Report

·        DOI Strategic Plan

·        Organizational Chart

·        Staff List

 

Examining the Data

The team analyzed the above documents to summarize the vision, goals, objectives and anticipated changes for the HR community.  Included on the attached page, is a summary outlining the agency vision and agency-wide initiatives that will have an impact on the services and workload of the Human Resource Office.  In addition, the report analyze the anticipated changes on a table titled, “Examining the Data”, which outlines specific areas needing further staff study based on anticipated changes.

The following table addresses each impact on skills affected and uses this information to plan and identify new skills, work processes, FTE’s and services to be provided.  The full analysis is included.

 

REPORT OF FINDINGS

AGENCY MISSION: The Mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to tribes.

Human Resources Management Goal: We will create a work environment in which our diverse workforce is valued, motivated, developed and rewarded for excellent customer-focused service.

Values and Guiding Principles: We are committed to building and maintaining an environment where merit principles, effective leadership, excellence, and empowerment are respected and valued.

Strategic Outcomes: 

·        Deliver the best human resources services for Interior employees

·        Manage Interior’ human resources as expected by the American people

The Ten Strategic Actions

  1. Hire and promote on merit

  2. Train and develop for mission and career advancement

  3. Enhance a quality workplace and competitive benefits

  4. Reward for excellent performance and discipline fairly

  5. Provide quality and timely personnel services

  6. Achieve and maintain workforce diversity

  7. Streamline innovative policies and approaches

  8. Plan for future workforce needs

  9. Communicate effectively with employees and the public

  10. Resolve disputes equitably and build partnerships with unions

In addition to the HR Vision, our workforce planning analysis will be based on a new paradigm for HR, which is the future direction for HR. According to published documents, HR will be moving towards:

THE NEW PARADIGM FOR HR

Current HR

Future HR

Personnel Office

HR Management

Case Driven

Customer Driven

Paper process

Automation of process

Command/Control

Creative flexibility

Hierarchical

Empowered teams

Potential agency-wide initiative have been identified that will have a direct impact on services, personnel, budget, skills/competencies and future positions relating to the HR organization. These potential initiatives are outlined below and should be used to assist with planning for future positions in the HR field.

Below is a listing of the agency-wide initiatives that are reflected and analyzed in Table 1:

AGENCY-WIDE INITIATIVES

Federal Personnel/Payroll System (FPPS) is an online, integrated personnel/payroll system developed by the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation Administrative Service Center. This system is used in the Federal government for the processing of all personnel and pay related function. The system operates on an IBM mainframe computer in a database environment in which data is updated immediately. FPPS contain security controls that allow users to access only the data within their area of responsibility. Interior uses the Federal Payroll Process System (FPPS) to process personnel and payroll information.

The Employee Express makes it easy for employees to process their own personnel actions using automation. Before EE, employees were required to submit forms and documentation to their servicing personnel office to process any changes in their personal benefits. The personnel office would do all the background work, process the paperwork, follow-up, provide advice and direction and finalized all of these personnel actions. Using Employee Express, the personnel office is no longer needed to process certain personnel actions for employees. The actions include changing/adding/deleting health insurance, thrift savings, allotments and tax withholding information. The agency plans to eventually expand its capability to include all personal actions into this system.

The data warehouse system makes it easier and user friendly to access various types of information from different computer systems housing the information. This is a one-stop process that allows you to access information from the many systems being utilized at this agency. It allows you to run reports, queries and ascertain information from a variety of administrative databases. Before data-warehouse, employees were required to submit forms to the customer support branch for any information needed. Thus, this system minimizes the operation of the customer support branch.

FHRIS (currently under construction and in pilot stage) is a state-of-the-art human resources management information technology system designed by SAP and ICRC to improve human resource business processes and functionality in the Department.

FHRIS is an Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) meaning the product integrates all (or most) functionality needs into one piece of software. For instance, FHRIS will be able to support recruiting, priority consideration, rating and ranking, position management, employee development, career planning, succession planning, training, appraising, performance management, workforce planning, cases/complaint tracking, and reduction-in-force processing all within the same product. Any data collected in one function is available for use in another. Once you collect data from an employee on their competencies and qualifications, that data can be used in employee development, career planning, and workforce planning. Similarly, appraisal information can be used in performance management and Reduction-In-Force placement. Also, FHRIS will be able to integrate with FPPS and other systems.

Examining the Data (analyzing the anticipated changes)

TABLE 1

Initiative

Potential Impact

Volume of work

Type of work

Org. structure

Mix of skills

Supervisory Ratio

FTE change

Workload

Employee Relations

Spec may leave. Multi level spec. New service fee

Decrease – work will go to service center

Higher level duties

Reduction in staff –eliminate some ER positions

N/A

Decrease- ER’s may go to SC-very few left in HRM

Less employees in ER field, less needed in HR

More cases for service center. Less cases for HR offices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Business System

N/A

Increase in automated work.

Need less high level; less need for CSB.

N/A

IT skills will be needed

N/A

Decrease number of processing staff

Affected by use of computers. Actions processed faster. Less staff needed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee Express

Less support staff/less processing staff

Less payroll type work needed

N/A

N/A

Data Entry skills will be needed/less HR skills

N/A

Less personnel support staff.

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data-Warehouse

Customer Support Branch

Less processing reports

No reports will be requested

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Employee info will be easily accessible. No effect on workload.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Career Here

Support Staff

Different process 4 posting jobs

No change

N/A

Data Entry Skills

N/A

Decrease in support staff

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE 1 (con’t)

Initiative

Potential Impact

Volume of work

Type of work

Org. structure

Mix of skills

Supervisory Ratio

FTE change

Workload

Processing timecards eliminated

Decreased

N/A

N/A

N/A

ITAS Policy personnel needed

N/A

No changes in personnel/TK was an added duty for Staff

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FHRIS

Do recruiting, rating and ranking, position mgmt., employee develop, training, RIF, career planning, etc

Decrease

N/A

N/A

Computer skills will be needed.

N/A

N/A

Decrease workload by integrating with FPPS and other systems

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Staffing will be automated

Different

Job posting and closing will be automated

N/A

Automation skills will be need

N/A

N/A

Employees can post, close, monitor jobs online. The application process will be automated

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Classification

Decrease

N/A

Classifier will become HR Generalist

N/A

N/A

Decrease the number of classifiers

Classification will be automated in the computer system. Less need for classifiers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identify training needs

Employee Dev. will increase the volume of work

 

N/A

IT skills will be needed

N/A

N/A

Employee will be able to use new competencies increase production

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessment of Current and Projected Workforce

Based on the assumptions mentioned and the Table 1, the following skills/competencies (overall) will be needed in the future:

Data Assessment by Occupational Series

We assessed our current workforce to determine the extent the current workforce would meet the needs of the future. In doing so, we analyzed the current workforce by series, grade, race, gender and retirements. The following is our analysis:

ANALYSIS OF DATA:

  1. Total number of employees: 52
  2. Occupation breakdown:
  1. RNO Information:

4. Average Retirement Age: 60 years old

  1. Retirement eligibility for current staff: 12 employees are eligible to retire between now and 2003.

 

The results of this analysis are documented on the following Gap Analysis form under "projected supply"

EXAMPLE: Gap Form 
with Projected Supply

TITLE

Series

FTE

Base

 

 

Projected Supply

 

 

Projected Need

 

 

 

GAP (+ or - no. of positions)

Comments/Remarks

 

 

 

Line

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

 

Pers. Mgmt. Spec.

201

21

21

18

20

16

19

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ER Specialists

230

8

8

6

8

8

8

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Labor Relations

233

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Personnel Asst.

203

15

15

15

15

15

14

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Management Analyst

343

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student

299

5

5

2

2

1

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected Workforce Needs

The following chart documents the current workforce, anticipates future need based on new initiatives, new skills needed, new programs, organizational structure changes, and explains the projected need.

Title

Series

Grade

FTE’s needed

Current Staff

Gap

Comments:

HEADQUARTER

Director

201

15

1

1

0

 

PMS

201

14

2

3

+1

Due to technology, support staff will decrease

PMS

201

13

2

1

+1

Retirement

ER

230

14

1

3

+2

Some ER’s may go to service centers. This will reduce ER staff

Per. Asst

203

06

1

2

+1

Due to technology, support staff will decrease.

LR Spec

233

14

1

1

0

MA

343

13

1

1

-1

PMS (systems manager)

201

13

1

0

-1

Due to the many changes in technology/new systems, a PMS systems manager is needed

COMP A

PMS

201

13

4

3

-1

Will need more PMS versus Staffing specialist

ER

230

13

2

2

0

 

P. Asst

203

5

1

1

0

 

COMP B

PMS

201

13

2

1

-2

Will need more PMS’s due to phasing out of Staff Spec

PMS

212

13

0

3

+2

This series will be phased out- eliminated by 2003

ER

260

13

1

1

0

 

P. Asst

203

5

1

1

0

 

Student

299

4

1

1

0

 

COMP C

PMS

201

13

2

2

0

 

 

ER

260

13

2

0

+2

Increase in ER workload due to service center

P. Asst.

203

5

1

1

0

 

Student

299

4

1

1

0

 

PMS

212

13

1

1

0

 

COMP D

PMS

201

13

3

3

0

 

PMS

201

12

1

1

0

 

PMS

201

11

1

1

0

 

P. Asst

203

5

1

1

0

 

COMP E

PMS

201

13

0

2

+2

Processing function being distributed to other comp. Due to automation, function gone by 2002

P. Asst

203

6

0

8

+8

Processing function being distributed to other comp. Due to automation, function gone by 2002

The information documented above (in the chart) is outlined on the following Gap Analysis form under "Projected Need".

GAP Analysis Forms:

Examples of the GAP Analysis Form to illustrate that workforce planning can be simple or complex, depending upon the needs of the organization.

The following contains a:

Example: Gap Form 
with Projected Need

TITLE

Series

FTE

Base

 

 

Projected Supply

 

 

Projected Need

 

 

 

GAP (+ or - no. of positions)

Comments/Remarks

 

 

 

Line

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

 

Pers. Mgmt. Spec.

201

21

21

18

20

16

19

19

20

21

16

16

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

ER Specialists

230

8

8

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

Labor Relations

233

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Personnel Asst.

203

15

15

15

15

15

14

15

15

11

7

7

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Management Analyst

343

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student

299

5

5

2

2

1

0

0

2

2

1

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GAP Analysis Forms:

Examples of the GAP Analysis Form to illustrate that workforce planning can be simple or complex, depending upon the needs of the organization.

The following contains a:

 

Detailed Model

TITLE

 

 

 

 

Series

 

 

 

 

FPL

 

 

 

 

FTE

 

 

 

 

Base

 

 

 

 

Projected Supply

 

 

 

 

Projected Need

 

 

 

GAP (+ or - no. of positions)

 

 

 

Reason for Action / Comment

 

 

 

 

Line

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

 

Headquarters:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director, HR

201

15

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

 

Pers. Mgmt. Spec.

201

14

3

3

3

2

1

3

3

1

1

1

0

1

2

1

0

3

2

Retirements

Pers. Mgmt. Spec.

201

13

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

Retirements

ER Specialist

230

14

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

 

ER Specialist

230

13

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

 

Labor Relations

233

14

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

 

Management Analyst

343

13

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

-1

0

Asst. in special proj/org studies

Personnel Asst.

203

6

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Component A:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pers. Mgmt. Spec.

201

13

4

4

3

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

-1

0

0

0

0

Comp. E being phased out

ER Specialist

233

13

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

0

0

0

0

1

Retirements

Personnel Asst.

203

5

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

-1

1

Comp. E being phased out

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Component B:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pers. Mgmt. Spec.

201

13

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

3

3

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

Need HR generalist with variety of HR duties

Staffing Specialist

212

13

3

3

3

2

2

2

2

2

1

0

0

0

1

1

2

2

2

Move toward HR generalist with variety of HR duties

ER Specialist

230

13

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

0

0

-1

-1

-1

Increase in ER workload

Personnel Asst.

203

5

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

 

Student

299

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

0

0

0

0

-1

Graduates in 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Detailed Model -- Continued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Title

Series

FPL

FTE

Base

  

  

Projected Supply

  

  

Projected Need

  

  

  

GAP (+ or - no. of positions)

Reason for Action/Comment

  

  

  

  

Line

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

 

Component C:

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pers. Mgmt. Spec.

201

13

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

 

Staffing Specialist

212

13

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

1

0

0

0

0

2

3

3

3

3

Need generalists and more ER specialists

ER Specialist

230

13

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

-2

0

0

0

0

Increase in ER workload

Labor Relations

233

13

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

 

Personnel Asst.

203

5

5

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Component D:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Personnel Mgmt. Spec.

201

13

5

5

4

5

4

5

5

4

5

4

5

4

0

0

0

0

1

Retirement; Additional duties distributed. Has heaviest workload; incumbents responsible for SES program and employment

Personnel Asst.

203

5

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

 

Student

299

4

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Graduates in 2001; studied computer science

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Component E:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Personnel Mgmt. Spec.

201

13

2

2

2

2

0

0

0

2

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

Processing function being distributed to other comp. due to automated system; function to be gone by 2002

Personnel Asst.

203

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

4

0

0

0

0

4

8

8

8

Processing function being distributed to other components due to automated system; function to be gone by 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Model

 

TITLE

Series

FTE

Base

 

 

Projected Supply

 

 

Projected Need

 

 

 

GAP (+ or - no. of positions)

Comments/Remarks

 

 

 

Line

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

 

Pers. Mgmt. Spec.

201

21

21

18

20

16

19

19

20

21

16

16

16

-2

-1

0

3

3

 

ER Specialists

230

8

8

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

-2

0

0

0

0

Increased ER workload

Labor Relations

233

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

 

Personnel Asst.

203

15

15

15

15

15

14

15

15

11

7

7

7

0

4

8

7

8

Component E will be phased out due to automation system

Management Analyst

343

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

-1

-1

Needed specific knowledge of org. Assts in special organizational projects

Student

299

5

5

2

2

1

0

0

2

2

1

1

1

0

0

0

-1

-1

Graduates in 2001 and 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Model – Abbreviated

TITLE

Series

FTE

Base

Line

Supply

Need

GAP

Comments/Remarks

Broad Strategies

Action Items

  

 

 

 

2003

2003

2003

 

 

 

Pers. Mgmt. Spec.

201

21

21

19

16

3

 

Reassign surplus PMS

 

ER Specialists

230

8

8

8

8

0

Increased ER workload

Retrain; external recruitment; use Coop

Labor Relations

233

2

2

2

2

0

 

 

 

Personnel Asst.

203

15

15

14

7

7

Component E will be phased out due to automation system

Reassignments; earlyouts/buyouts; retraining

Management Analyst

343

1

1

0

1

-1

Needed specific knowledge of org. Assts in special organizational projects

Recruit agency-wide

Hire 1 in 2003

Student

299

5

5

0

1

-1

Convert when eligible

Convert as PMS, ER, and HR automation pos.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BUDGET ISSUES

According to the Consolidate Model, the following information was obtained for FY 2004:

Title

Series

FTE

Base Line

Supply

Need

Gap

Comments/Broad Strategies/Action Items/Remarks

Per. Mgmt. Spec

201

21

21

19

16

+3

Reassign Surplus PMS

ER Specialists

230

8

8

8

8

0

Increase ER workload; Retrain;

Labor Relations

233

2

2

2

2

0

 

Personnel Asst

203

15

15

15

7

+8

Component E will be phased out due to automation; Reassignment; earlyouts/buyouts; retraining

Management Analyst

343

1

1

0

1

-1

Needed specific knowledge of org. Assists in special org. projects; Recruit agencywide; Hire 1 in 2003

Student

299

5

5

0

1

-1

Convert when elig.; Convert as PMS, ER, and HR automation pos.

 

Appendix A  |  Appendix B  | Appendix C  | Appendix D  |  Appendix E  | Appendix F  | Back to Manual 

 

 

APPENDIX B

OMB BUDGET REQUIREMENTS

OMB Circular No. A-11 Requirements (FY2001)

Personnel Costs. Required FTE’s and Grades, broken out by full-time permanent and other than full-time permanent status. Include all positions including student programs (SCPE, STEP, WTOP, coop, Summer Aids, etc). (This is based on 2004 figures.)

Total FTE’s – 34
Total STEP – 1

Personnel Costs- $2,975,000
  

Total Personnel Cost 

$2,975,000

 

Customer Service Costs. Project costs involving training, awareness activities, recruiting program, etc.

Training costs - $50,000
Recruiting expenses - $25,000


Total Customer Service Cost 

$    75,000

 

EEO Program Costs. Project costs involving training, awareness activities, recruiting programs, etc.

The office plans to implement diversity training for all managers

Training costs - $50,000
Related expenses – $15,000
Travel cost - $25,000
  

Total EEO Program Costs   

$    90,000

 

Workforce Training and Development Costs. Projected costs for tuition, travel, per diem, instructors, class- rooms, equipment, books, training material, etc.

The office plans to implement the new FHRIS projects. Training cost associated with the implementation include:

Workforce training and retraining:
Tuition $150,000
Equipment (computer) $ 10,000
Travel (recruiting) $ 25,000
Per diem $ 2,000
Equipment $ 10,000
Conferences $ 50,000
Books $ 5,000
Training material $ 5,000

 

Total Training and Development Cost

$  257,000

 

Award Costs. Annual sum of organization’s performance management plan projects for awards program. This will usually be a percentage of the total personnel compensation program (i.e. 1% of total personnel budget).

$1,975,000 x 1% = $19,750

Total Award Cost    $     19,750

 

Executive Selection and Development Program Costs. Project cost for program administration, contractor support training, travel, per diem, etc.

Bonus and Allowances Cost. Project costs for recruitment bonuses, relocation bonuses, and retention allowances.

The Labor Relations (series 233) department has two employees that are crucial to the operation of the office. Because of the labor relations’ shortage and Department’s upcoming labor contracts we must offer retention bonuses to ensure we retain these employees.

 

Employee One GS 13 Step 5 Salary  $71,642@25%=$17,911
Employee Two GS 14 Step 2 Salary   $77,187@25%=$19,297
Total Retention Bonus Cost   $    37,208

 

Relocation Costs. Project costs for transportation, per diem, transportation of household goods, storage and care of household goods allowances for home sale/purchase expenses, temporary quarters subsistence, reimbursement of income taxes, moving expenses, relocation service charges, etc.

We have three personnel assistants (series 203) displaced because Component E will be phased out due to the automation system. These employees will be relocated to our Atlanta, GA office.

Transportation of household goods  $  12,000
Storage allowance        3,000
Allowance for home sale/purchase  $100,000
Temporary quarters subsistence     10,000
Moving expense $    3,000
Reimbursement of income taxes $    1,000

Total $129,000

 

We have 5 students currently serving in the STEP Program. Upon conversion, the moving and relocation costs are:

Cost to convert Student (STEP) 5@ $3,000 each

Total $ 15,000

Total Relocation Cost  $  144,000

Recruitment Program Cost. Project costs for publicity material program administration, travel, per diem, school recruitment feeds, etc.

New recruitment brochures $1,000

Publicity (advertise for recruitment and program administration in trade magazines, conferences, etc) $5,000

 

Total Recruitment Program Cost $      6,000

Downsizing Cost: Project costs or voluntary separation incentive program (buy-outs), early-out retirements, severance pay, etc.

Early-out incentive program– 4employees @$25,000 each

Project cost –$25,000

 

Total Downsizing Cost  $   125,000
Grand Workforce Planning Total $3,728,958

 

A-11 also allows the organization to document results from streamlining, reduced overhead, creative uses of technology, and elimination of low priority tasks or program.

Appendix A  |  Appendix B  | Appendix C  | Appendix D  |  Appendix E  | Appendix F  | Back to Manual 

 

APPENDIX C

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Action Item

Specific activity within the WFP Action Plan assigned to an individual or group for completion within specified time frame.

 

Action Plan

A collection of specific activities, which will address the significant WFP gaps as identified in the gap analysis form.

 

Attrition

The reduction of staffing levels from an organizational level due to resignations, reassignments, transfers to other agencies, deaths, etc., in a fiscal year. Retirements are normally included in attrition; however, it will be projected separately in the WFP process.

 

Baseline

The total number of staffed, permanent positions identified at the beginning of the WFP process.

 

Competency

Underlying characteristic of an employee (traits, skills, body of knowledge, etc.)

 

Competitive Sourcing

Comparing the cost of using Government employees and other resources to perform work in-house versus the cost of contracting with commercial firms

 

Fair Act

Directs Federal agencies to submit each year an inventory of all activities performed by Federal employees that are not inherently governmental in nature (i.e., commercial in nature).

 

Full Performance Level (FPL)

The fully functional grade level of a properly classified position.

 

Full-time Equivalent (FTE) Employment

The total hours worked divided by 2087 hours. FTE is projected on a full fiscal year basis. One FTE is equivalent to one staff year.

 

Gap

The difference between projected positions and human resources supply. It can be a positive number indicating surplus workforce or a negative number indicating unmet projected positions.

 

Government Performance Results Act (GPRA)

Requires agencies to prepare annual performance plans that set out measurable goals that define what will be accomplished during a fiscal year.

 

Human Resource Need

Organization’s forecast of needed staff size and skill mix for the designated planning period.

 

Occupational Series

A numerical designation given to position(s) that have similar specialized work and qualification requirements.

 

Organizational Level

The administrative subdivision to which an employee is assigned

 

Outsourcing

Contract-out for functions or services in accordance with acquisition regulations (FAIR Act, A-76 studies, management decisions, etc.)

 

Permanent Workforce

Consists of all permanent positions (full-time and part-time) within the workforce.

 

Projected Positions

Based on budget expectations the projected skills and tasks identified by series, title and FPL grade necessary to achieve the work of the agency.

 

Projected Workforce Need

Organization’s forecast of needed staff size and skill mix for the designated planning period that will be needed to conduct the work in the future.

 

Projected Workforce Supply

The projected number of employees by series, title, and FPL grade available in the future based on projected retirements and attrition trend data.

 

Retirement Projection

The number of employees anticipated being lost due to retirement.

 

Skill

An observable and measurable expertise needed to perform a task.

 

Staffing Assessment

The determination by the organization of the ideal staff size and skill mix needed to carry out its strategic objectives.

 

Strategy

An approach to addressing an issue.

 

Surplus 

The amount by which the supply exceeds needs.

 

Volunteers

Individuals that offer their services at not cost to the government. Use of such individuals must be in accordance with law.

 

Workforce Planning

A process that ensures people with the appropriate skills are in the right place, at the right location, at the right time to meet the customers’ changing needs. It examines what an organization needs to accomplish in a given period of time; what knowledge, skills, and experience are required to get the job done; and how large and what type of workforce is required to provide that mix of skills, knowledge, and experience.

 

Workforce Planning Team

A group of individuals with multi disciplinary backgrounds from the agency involved in activities within their respective organizational level and who can ensure the right skills are in the right location at the right time to meet conservation issues.

Appendix A  |  Appendix B  | Appendix C  | Appendix D  |  Appendix E  | Appendix F  | Back to Manual 

 

APPENDIX D

REFERENCES AND SOURCES

 

  • "Right People, Right Place, Right Time: A Guide to Workforce Planning in the U.S. Department of the Interior" Department of the Interior, Office of Personnel Policy, May 2000.
  • "Building Successful Organizations, Workforce Planning in HHS," Draft, Office of Human Resources, Assistant Secretary for Management and Budget, June 1999.
  • "Personnel Bulletin – 250-1, Workforce Planning Policy," Office of Human Resources Management, U.S. Department of Agriculture, October 14, 1997.
  • "Workforce Planning Guide" Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, July 1999
  • Workforce Planning Policy, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1996
  • "Workforce Planning Guide," U. S. Department of Transportation, April 1999
  • "Beyond 2000," Air Force Personnel, U. S. Department of Air Force
  • "Palace Agenda," Air Force Personnel, U.S. Department of Air Force, December 1992
  • "Government Performance and Results Act, FY 2001 FY 1999 Performance Plan, National Institutes of Health, June 8, 1999
  • "A Strategic Vision of HRM for NIH," Office of Human Resource Management, National Institutes of Health
  • "National Institutes of Health, 1998 Report," National Association of Public Administration for Human Resources Management
  • "Review of NIH Administrative Structure and Costs," National Institutes of Health, Final Report, November 4, 1997, Arthur Andersen Government Services
  • "Human Capital – A Self-Assessment Checklist for Agency Leaders," General Accounting Office, Discussion Draft, GAO/GGD-99-179, September 1999.
  • "Major Management Challenges and Program Risks-A Government-wide Perspective" General Accounting Office, GAO-01-241, January 2001.

Appendix A  |  Appendix B  | Appendix C  | Appendix D  |  Appendix E  | Appendix F  | Back to Manual 

 

APPENDIX E

WORKLOAD ANALYSIS
GENERAL CONCEPTS

WORKLOAD ANALYSIS

Workload analysis is viewed as a separate set of processes that contribute to workforce planning. As such, this section provides general information and basic steps when conducting workload analysis only.

 

WORKLOAD ANALYSIS

What is Workload Analysis?

Workload analysis is a descriptive baseline of the workload requirements by discipline in an organizational unit. It provides leaders with a process to assist with allocating resources, communicating priorities, and identifying skills and training needed by employees to accomplish the workload.

Once an organization completes an accurate assessment of the work and the staff required to complete the work, then management can discuss longer-range resource priorities and staffing needs based on realistic resource improvement goals and staffing requirements. Plans can be developed to allocate funding to filling gaps, improve operating efficiencies, and improve technical skills and competency.

Uses for WLA:

  • Management decision making tool
  • Analyze workload by activity, discipline needs, current location of specialists, and where staff is needed to address emerging issues.
  • Analyzing current work processes and discuss potential ways to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
  • Provide supporting data to tie the costs of program to social, economic, and medical research benefits.
  • Facilitate discussion and review of priorities associated with work products.
  • Project impacts of new or additional programs and mandates on current and future workload and workforce.
  • Provide data to tie workload and personnel needs to more comprehensive resource assessments.
  • Help managers determine how to reduce excessive or uneven workload.
  • Assist in the development of training needs for employees.
  • Provide human resource data when organizational changes are being considered.
  • Project what disciplines will be needed for the future workforce
  • Assist in the development and evaluation of performance measurements.
  • Provide supporting data in resource allocation decisions.
  • Produce database of work process for future reference.
  • Provide data for budget justifications
  • Provide data for strategic planning decisions

How should it be conducted?

Workload analysis should be conducted in two parts. The first major part is to determine both the total amount of work activities needed and what will be accomplished within the next fiscal year in each organizational unit. For each work activity, a measurement unit (number), the source of the data to use (if applicable), and any additional considerations for clarity, consistency, and accuracy.

The second major activity is to determine the amount of time required to complete the work activities by discipline. For each work product, a time analysis should be conducted. The time analysis consists of documenting the time required by different disciplines to carry out tasks needed to accomplish the work activity.

Basic WLA model is:

Time Data x Number of work activities next year = Total Time Required

To determine staffing levels (FTE) required:

Total Time Required / 2080 hours = FTE Workforce Required.

 

Verification of data:

To check the reasonableness of the time study data, estimate the progress of each activity for last year, then multiply the time study data. The result should be the approximate workforce that existed last year.

Time study Data x Work activity for last year = Total Time Required for last year

To determine workforce (FTE) required:

Total time required / 2080 hours = FTE Workforce required for last year.

The reasonableness test of using last year’s accomplishments to compute the number of staff that is required to complete the workload should provide a basic check of the time study data. If the time study data is reasonable, then the staff required to complete last year’s progress on each activity should approximate last year’s workforce. If the time study numbers are too high then the model will show that more staff was required than was available to complete last year’s workload.

Identification of time by discipline:

Record the discipline skills/competencies necessary to accomplish the work activity. The working title of the individual currently in the position is not relevant to this process, but the skills/competencies needed to complete the activity should be captured. For example, a microbiologist may be a biologist by training. If the microbiologist acts as a biologist accomplishing a work activity, then record that time in the biologist column of the spreadsheet. Use the same methodology for all disciplines used in the organization.

In completing the worksheet, it may be necessary to consider the various employee titles of the organization, however, place the employees in the most applicable category, depending upon the skills/competencies needed to accomplish the work activity.

It is recognized that there may be variations in the amount of time required for each work activity. A typical unit (type and/or size) must be determined and all time identified as it relates to this typical unit.

Please pay attention to those tasks, steps, or components that should be counted in other work activities. This will avoid duplication of time between activities. Care should be exercised to prevent double counting.

In order to get a comprehensive accounting of total time required to complete a work activity, it is important that all time, including that of other employees, non-FTEs, volunteers, are included.

 

LIMITATIONS OF WLA

  • It is only an estimate of the workload
  • Estimates are only as good as the "estimators"

 

EXAMPLE OF WORKSHEET TO ESTIMATE TIME

Work Product: ________________________________________________________________

Typical Size Unit: _____________________________________________________________

 

Describe typical unit and assumptions used:





 

Typical practices/activities:





 

Task
(Per Unit)
Time
(Staff hours)

A ______
- ______
- ______
______
______
Other:
____________________________________________

______
B. ______
- ______
- ______
- ______
- ______
Other:
____________________________________________

______
TOTAL PLANNING TIME (Staff Hours/Unit)  ______

EXAMPLE OF WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT – ACQUISITIONS

Assessing the current workload involves reviewing financial analysis and analyzing the performance measures. This analysis will answer two issues: (1) are you efficient compared to your operating costs; and (2) are you performing within the realm of your goals and objectives. This information will help managers understand their workforce needs by examining the work output against the work inputs. It will also identify areas of improvement based on the results from measuring the organization performance. This could include: identifying additional FTE’s, delegating work, increasing work, increasing efficiency among employees and/or setting new standards of performance.

 

PART 1

Cost Effectiveness

This part of the document focuses on analyzing the financial aspects of specific functions. Below, the Acquisitions field is used only as an example of how to submit adequate data for analyzing your operations cost effectiveness and resource utilization.

 

DATA COLLECTION

Questions

  1. List all applicable expenses for overhead, FTE’s etc.:
  2. For example: In Acquisitions, this would apply to both Central Procurement and any Service Center in order to demonstrate consistency in the charges. To compare the efficiency, service, and cost effectiveness of these services, please include all costs associate with your fee for processing procurement orders, such as: Rent charges, Utility charges, Training, Equipment, policy, protest administration and FTEs total cost.

  3. Are you allotted an appropriated budget?
  4. What percentage of your appropriated budget covers overhead?
  5. Do you charge a Fee-for-Service? What is the Fee?
  6. What percentage of each overhead charge is included in the "Fee"
  7. Does this "Fee" include all employees in the 1100 series or only actual employees processing contracts?
  8. Name the services that you provide (in general). Which of these services are included in the fee?
  9. What types of contracts do you process and how long does it take to process each?
  10. Is the fee standard for all contract types?
  11. What is the level of difficulty of each type of contract? For example: Contract Type A – 30 days to process; Contract Type B – 10 days to process; Contract Type C – 9 days to process
  12. For the contract types above, what grade level of specialist processes each?
  13. How many actions (each type) were processed this fiscal year? Last fiscal year?
  14. How many actions do you process monthly?
  15. What were the dollar amounts of each contract type?

 

MEASURING:

In order to measure your work output and inputs, you need to establish units of measure. The following assists in determining what units to use for measuring.

 

To Quantify:

  1. How many contracts processed?
  2. Per type of contract
  3. Dollar amount for each type

 

Unit of Measure:

Contracts completed per type

 

Analyzing the output (actions processed):

  1. How many contracts submitted?
  2. How many processed?
  3. How many customers (ICD’s, internal, etc)?

 

Analyzing the input (resources)

  1. How many FTE processing contracts?
  2. How many FTE in series but are not processing contracts?

 

For example: To process contracts, the following are units of measure:

  • Number of customers
  • Type of contracts processed (What kind?)
  • Pre-established timeframes
  • How many specialists worked on a particular contract?
  • Level of difficulty for contract

 

Note: The above data, collected and analyzed, will answer the following questions: Is the amount of output (contracts processed) sufficient to the fees charged and resources used?

 

PERFORMANCE GOALS:

This part of the document focuses on analyzing whether you are meeting your performance goals. Question 1 through 7 will determine whether you are meeting your goals:

Questions

  1. What are your performance goals per contract? Per action?
  2. How many actions do you process per week?
  3. Do you track the number of actions processed?
  4. If yes, how do you track actions processed, such as by type?
  5. How much do you anticipate collecting each year from fee? How much do you actually collect?
  6. Is there a Gap in expected revenue?
  7. How do you address the Gap?

 

PART 2

Analyzing the data from Part 1 and using the formulas below, you can measure your efficiency level.

 

Measuring Efficiency:

Units of Measures:

Outputs

    • Contracts Processed (unit of measure)

Input (use a unit for the resources) used that is the most meaningful)

    • FTE’s
    • Staff hours
    • Square feet
    • Hours of use
    • Dollars

For input, include all resources (FTE) used in producing an output (processing contracts) by using cost in terms of dollars. For example: Give the total cost per FTE.

To measure levels of efficiency, use the formula below:

 

To determine Unit Cost:

Use dollars as input; Work completed as output

Formula to use to determine unit costs:

            Unit Cost = Costs (Resources Used) / Output Quantity

 

To determine Productivity Ratios: (Expressed as "output per units of input")

Use resource quantity as input; work units completed as output

Formula to use to determine productivity rate:

            Output / Resource Quantity used = Productivity Rate

Example: Contracts processed per month divided by the number of contract specialist

 

To determine Productivity Indices: (Expressed as a measure of the change over time of the quantity of products or services produced (output to the quantity or cost of resources used in production (Input).

Formula to use to determine productivity indices:

            Change in output / change in input = Productivity index

            (contracts processed decreased) / (number of specialist changed)

OR

Index of output / Index of Input = Productivity index

 

To determine Operating Costs to Transaction Dollar (A unique productivity ratio, usually expressed as a percentage)

  • Use dollars as inputs; dollars as output; output dollars are a proxy indicator of work done.

 

Formula to use to analyze operating costs to transaction dollars

Operating cost (FTE costs) / Transaction Dollars = Efficiency Rate (how much does it cost per contract)

 

Examples:

  • Operating costs as percent of sales
  • Operating costs as percent of benefit payments
  • Operating costs as percent of taxes collected

 

To Determine Resource Utilization (show the usage rate of a given resource. This would be used for critical resources)

Formula to use to determine if resources are utilized efficiently

            Amount used / total available = usage rate

Example: Two out of 10 contract specialist worked on a project.

Appendix A  |  Appendix B  | Appendix C  | Appendix D  |  Appendix E  | Appendix F  | Back to Manual 

 

APPENDIX F

COMPETENCY/SKILLS ASSESSMENT
GENERAL CONCEPT

COMPETENCY/SKILLS ASSESSMENT

This type of analysis is viewed as a separate set of processes that contribute to a quality workforce plan. Because we focused strictly on workforce planning processes and not separate, but related processes such as competency analysis, we have included this section to provide a basic understanding.

 

COMPETENCY ANALYSIS

What are competencies?

Competencies are a set of behaviors that encompass skills, knowledge, abilities, and personal attributes that, taken together, are critical to successful work accomplishment. Competencies may be defined organizationally or on an individual basis. Identifying competencies on an organizational basis provides a means for pinpointing the most critical competencies for organizational success. These are an organization’s core competencies.

Individual competencies are those that each employee brings to his or her function. Individual and team competencies are critical components of organizational competencies. If the individual competencies in the workforce are not in accord with those needed by the organization, workforce planning will point out these gaps.

What is a competency model?

A competency model is a map to display a set of competencies that are aligned with an organization’s mission, vision, and strategic goals. The competency model is future-oriented, describing an ideal workforce. The competencies that make up the model serve as a basis for employee management, since they play a key role in decisions on recruiting, employee development, personal development, and performance management.

A competency model helps bridge the gap between where an organization is now and where they want to be in the future. This occurs in two ways. First, the competency model serves as a guide for management in making decisions, since it is based on the competencies that support the mission, vision, and goals of the organization. Second, the competency model serves as a map to guide employees toward achieving the mission of their organization and their functional area. This provides management and staff with a common understanding of the set of competencies and behaviors that are important to the organization. A well-developed and documented competency model will serve as the basis for organization training and development activities as well as the means for identifying competencies to be sought in new recruits.

How are competencies identified?

Competencies are developed based on information collected by studying what top performers do in the defined job context. Competencies focus on the attributes that separate the high performers from the rest of the workforce. Information can be gathered in a variety of ways, including employee questionnaires, focus groups, and interviews with managers and employees.

 

Two key elements in identifying competencies are:

  • Workforce skill analysis is a process that describes the skills required for today’s work. Conducting workforce skill analysis requires the leaders of an organization to anticipate how the nature of the organization’s work will change, and then to identify future human resource requirements. (This process spans the supply and demand analysis aspects of workforce planning.)
      
  • Job Analysis, which collects information describing successful job performance. Job analysis focuses on tasks, responsibilities, knowledge and skill requirements as well as other criteria that contribute to successful job performance. Information obtained from employees in this process is used to identify competencies.

Workforce planners can use competency analysis as a method of analyzing workforce gaps. Competency analysis is a process that identifies the current competency levels of the workforce, as well as the competencies required by the jobs of the future. As a part of competency analysis, planners can distribute a questionnaire (individually, by groups, or via e-mail) to employees at large or in positions that are subject to significant change in order to collect skills and education data and to assess their qualifications.

The competency analysis will help planners to determine if it is possible to retrain these employees so that they may develop the competencies that the organization will require in the future. Timing and presentation of such a questionnaire is critical.

 

Steps for Conducting Competency Analysis:

  1. Identify the job competencies that will be required for future positions in the organization. A competency matrix can be used as a tool for identifying the competencies that are or will be required for specific positions. This step will probably have been conducted during the strategic planning and preliminary data gathering step in the workforce planning processes.
      
  2. Determine whether current employees possess the competencies that will be required by the identified positions. This is the data that will probably be missing or available only in anecdotal methods or based on assumptions related to current series and grade. A skill assessment tool can be used to measure individual employee competencies.
      
  3. Analyze the difference (if any) between current employee competencies and future organizational needs.

 

The results of the competency analysis will help identify potential retraining needs that employees in certain "excess" or "surplus" positions may require in order to transition into other positions within the organization. Employees may also want to know the results of the analysis for their own career development purposes. This may be helpful for retention if well-qualified current staff believe there are growth and learning opportunities for them within the organization.

If the organization determines that current employees will not have the ability to attain the competencies that will be required in the future, workforce planners will then need to identify the most appropriate recruitment strategies for filling the skill gap.

Competency Matrix*

B-Basic
I=Intermediate
A=Accomplished

Job A

Job B

Job C

Job D

Job E

Good Communicator:

  • Listening

  • Presentation-Formal

  • Oral

  • Written

B

A

A

B

I

Self Management:

  • Time Management

  • Stress Management

  • Assertiveness

A

B

I

A

B

Interpersonal Skills

  • Conflict Management

  • Teamwork

  • Negotiating

A

I

B

I

I

Leadership

  • Team building

  • Coaching

  • Change Management

B

B

I

A

A

Management

  • Financial

  • Human Resources

  • Technology

  • Info. Management

B

I

A

B

A

 

*Note: This competency matrix is intended to be a generic model. Planners should adapt or adjust competency models and matrices to correspond to organizational needs and characteristics. (Tool Adapted from U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Human Resources Management)

Skills Assessment Tool:*

The following is an example of an assessment tool that measures skills in each competency. In order to develop a well-rounded analysis, it is recommended that an employee complete the assessment and have the supervisor and at least one peer complete the assessment of that individual with respect to these skills.

Once all individual assessments are completed, compile all results on a single table and refer to analysis instructions below for completion of "Level Required for the Position" and "Areas to Improve" columns, and interpretation of results.

Directions:

In the table below, indicate the appropriate measure assessing the skill exhibited for each area.

1 - Basic level of Skill; has knowledge of general terms, concepts, processes and objectives relative to competency

3 - Intermediate level of Skill; has ability to apply competency to perform common tasks

5 - Accomplished level of Skill; Uses competency to perform common tasks.

0 - Indicates need for basic skill development

Leave Blank - A skill cannot be assessed

Competency

Self Assessment

(0 to 5)

Peer or Employee Assessment

(0 to 5)

Supervisor Assessment

(0 to 5)

Level Required for Position

(B, I, or A)

Area to Improve

Good Communicator:

  • Listening

  • Presentation-Formal

  • Oral

  • Written

 

 

 

 

 

Self Management:

  • Time Management

  • Stress Management

  • Assertiveness

 

 

 

 

 

Interpersonal Skills

  • Conflict Management

  • Teamwork

  • Negotiating

 

 

 

 

 

Leadership

  • Team building

  • Coaching

  • Change Management

 

 

 

 

 

Management

  • Financial

  • Human Resources

  • Technology

  • Info. Management

 

 

 

 

 

*Note: This skills assessment tool is intended to be a generic model. Organizations should adapt the tool to correspond to their needs. (Tool Adapted from U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Human Resources Management)

ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION

In the column marked "Level Required for Position", an employee should indicate the appropriate level for his/her position (basic, intermediate or full performance level) by referring to the proficiency level grid in the framework. Remember: Full Performance Level (A)=5, Intermediate (I)=3, and Basic (B)=1.

Place a T in the rows where two of the three (or both if you only have two columns completed) assessments of your skills fall below the required proficiency level for your role as identified in the skill requirements grid in this framework. For example, if your role requires an intermediate level of skill (3) in Technical Knowledge and you rated yourself a 2, your supervisor a 3, and your peer a 1, you should mark that row with a T. This identifies a need for development in that competency. This information should then be used, with your supervisor to develop an improvement plan.

Appendix A  |  Appendix B  | Appendix C  | Appendix D  |  Appendix E  | Appendix F  | Back to Manual | Return to Home Page