[Federal Register: June 19, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 118)]
[Notices]
[Page 41771-41789]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19jn02-126]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services
[CFDA No.: 84.133E-7]
National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research--
Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers (RERC) Program; Notice
Inviting Applications for Fiscal Year 2002
Note to Applicants: This notice contains the information,
application forms, and instructions you need to apply for a grant
under the program.
Purpose of the Program: The purpose of the RERC Program is to
improve the effectiveness of services authorized under the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (the Act), as amended.
For FY 2002 the competition for new awards focuses on projects
designed to meet the priorities we describe in the PRIORITIES section
of this application notice. The priorities are intended to improve
rehabilitation services and outcomes for individuals with disabilities.
Eligible Applicants: Parties eligible to apply for grants under
this program are States; public or private agencies, including for-
profit agencies; public or private organizations, including for-profit
organizations; institutions of higher education; and Indian tribes and
tribal organizations.
Application Available: June 19, 2002.
Letters of Intent
Due to the open nature of this competition, NIDRR is requiring all
potential applicants to submit a Letter of Intent (LOI). Each LOI must
be limited to a maximum of four pages and must include the following
information: (1) The title of the proposed RERC, the name of the host
institution, the name of the Principal Investigator (PI), and the names
of partner institutions and entities; (2) a brief statement of the
vision, goals, and objectives of the proposed RERC and a description of
its research and development activities at a sufficient level of detail
to allow NIDRR to select potential reviewers; (3) a list of proposed
RERC staff including the Center Director and key personnel; and (4) a
list of individuals whose selection as a reviewer might constitute a
conflict of interest due to involvement in proposal development,
selection as an advisory board member, co-PI relationships, etc.
The signed, original LOI must be received by NIDRR no later than
July 19, 2002. Submission of an LOI is a prerequisite for eligibility
to submit an application. With prior approval, an e-mail or facsimile
copy of an LOI will be accepted, but the signed original must be sent
to: William Peterson, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., room 3425, Switzer Building, Washington, DC 20202-2645.
For further information regarding the LOI requirement, contact William
Peterson at (202) 205-9192 or by e-mail at: william.peterson@ed.gov.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 19, 2002.
Maximum Award Amount: $900,000.
Note: We will reject any application that proposes a budget
exceeding the stated maximum award amount in any year (See 34 CFR
75.104(b)).
Estimated Number of Awards: 5.
Project Period: 60 months.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), 34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81,
82, 85, 86, and 97, and (b) The program regulations 34 CFR part 350.
Priorities
This competition focuses on projects designed to meet the
priorities in the notice of final priorities for these programs,
published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. The
priorities are: (a) Spinal Cord Injury; (b) Recreational Technologies
and Exercise Physiology Benefiting Persons with Disabilities; (c)
Applied Biomaterials; (d) Measurement and Monitoring of Functional
Performance; (e) Accessible Medical Instrumentation; (f) Universal
Interface Technologies; (g) Work Place Accommodations; (h) Accessible
Airline Transportation; and (i) Rehabilitation Robotics and
Telemanipulation Systems.
For FY 2002, these priorities are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet one or more of
these priorities.
Selection Criteria
We use the following selection criteria to evaluate applications
under this program.
The maximum score for all of these criteria is 100 points.
The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in parentheses.
An additional 10 points may be earned by an applicant depending on
how well they meet the additional selection criterion elsewhere in this
notice.
(a) Importance of the problem (6 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the importance of the problem.
(2) In determining the importance of the problem, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the applicant clearly describes the need
and target population (3 points).
(ii) The extent to which the proposed project will have beneficial
impact on the target population (3 points).
(b) Responsiveness to an absolute or competitive priority (4 points
total).
(1) The Secretary considers the responsiveness of an application to
the absolute or competitive priority published in the Federal Register.
(2) In determining the application's responsiveness to the absolute
or competitive priority, the Secretary considers the extent to which
the applicant addresses all requirements of the absolute or competitive
priority (4 points).
[[Page 41772]]
(c) Design of research activities (22 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the extent to which the design of
research activities is likely to be effective in accomplishing the
objectives of the project.
(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be
effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the research activities constitute a
coherent, sustained approach to research in the field, including a
substantial addition to the state-of-the-art (7 points).
(ii) The extent to which the methodology of each proposed research
activity is meritorious, including consideration of the extent to
which--
(A) The proposed design includes a comprehensive and informed
review of the current literature, demonstrating knowledge of the state-
of-the-art (3 points);
(B) Each research hypothesis is theoretically sound and based on
current knowledge (3 points);
(C) Each sample population is appropriate and of sufficient size (3
points);
(D) The data collection and measurement techniques are appropriate
and likely to be effective (3 points); and
(E) The data analysis methods are appropriate (3 points).
(d) Design of development activities (22 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the extent to which the design of
development activities is likely to be effective in accomplishing the
objectives of the project.
(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be
effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the plan for development, clinical
testing, and evaluation of new devices and technology is likely to
yield significant products or techniques, including consideration of
the extent to which--
(A) The proposed project will use the most effective and
appropriate technology available in developing the new device or
technique (4 points);
(B) The proposed development is based on a sound conceptual model
that demonstrates an awareness of the state-of-the-art in technology (4
points);
(C) The new device or technique will be developed and tested in an
appropriate environment (4 points);
(D) The new device or technique is likely to be cost-effective and
useful (3 points);
(E) The new device or technique has the potential for commercial or
private manufacture, marketing, and distribution of the product (4
points); and
(F) The proposed development efforts include adequate quality
controls and, as appropriate, repeated testing of products (3 points).
(e) Design of training activities (5 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the extent to which the design of
training activities is likely to be effective in accomplishing the
objectives of the project.
(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be
effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the type, extent, and quality of the
proposed clinical and laboratory research experience, including the
opportunity to participate in advanced-level research, are likely to
develop highly qualified researchers (5 points).
(f) Design of dissemination activities (7 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the extent to which the design of
dissemination activities is likely to be effective in accomplishing the
objectives of the project.
(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be
effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the materials to be disseminated are likely
to be effective and usable, including consideration of their quality,
clarity, variety, and format (5 points).
(ii) The extent to which the information to be disseminated will be
accessible to individuals with disabilities (2 points).
(g) Plan of operation (5 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the plan of operation.
(2) In determining the quality of the plan of operation, the
Secretary considers the adequacy of the plan of operation to achieve
the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget,
including clearly defined responsibilities, and timelines for
accomplishing project tasks (5 points).
(h) Collaboration (4 points Total).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of collaboration.
(2) In determining the quality of collaboration, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the applicant's proposed collaboration
with one or more agencies, organizations, or institutions is likely to
be effective in achieving the relevant proposed activities of the
project. (4 points).
(i) Adequacy and reasonableness of the budget (4 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the adequacy and the reasonableness of
the proposed budget.
(2) In determining the adequacy and the reasonableness of the
proposed budget, the Secretary considers the extent to which the budget
for the project, including any subcontracts, is adequately justified to
support the proposed project activities (4 points).
(j) Plan of evaluation (8 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the plan of evaluation.
(2) In determining the quality of the plan of evaluation, the
Secretary considers the extent to which the plan of evaluation will be
used to improve the performance of the project through the feedback
generated by its periodic assessments (8 points).
(k) Project staff (8 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the project staff.
(2) In determining the quality of the project staff, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability (2 points).
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the key personnel and other key staff have
appropriate training and experience in disciplines required to conduct
all proposed activities (3 points).
(ii) The extent to which the commitment of staff time is adequate
to accomplish all the proposed activities of the project (3 points).
(l) Adequacy and accessibility of resources (5 points total).
(1) The Secretary considers the adequacy and accessibility of the
applicant's resources to implement the proposed project.
(2) In determining the adequacy and accessibility of resources, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the applicant is committed to provide
adequate facilities, equipment, other resources, including
administrative support, and laboratories, if appropriate (3 points).
(ii) The extent to which the facilities, equipment, and other
resources are appropriately accessible to individuals with disabilities
who may use the facilities, equipment, and other resources of the
project (2 points).
Additional Selection Criterion (10 points).
We use the following additional criterion to evaluate applications
under each priority.
[[Page 41773]]
Up to 10 points based on the extent to which an application
includes effective strategies for employing and advancing in employment
qualified individuals with disabilities in projects awarded under these
absolute priorities. In determining the effectiveness of those
strategies, we will consider the applicant's prior success, as
described in the application, in employing and advancing in employment
qualified individuals with disabilities. Thus, for purposes of this
competitive preference, applicants can be awarded up to a total of 10
points in addition to those awarded under the published selection
criteria for these priorities. That is, an applicant meeting this
competitive preference could earn a maximum total of 110 points.
Pre-Application Meeting: Interested parties are invited to
participate in a pre-application meeting to discuss the funding
priorities and to receive technical assistance through individual
consultation and information about the funding priorities. The pre-
application meeting will be held on July 2, 2002 either in person or by
conference call at the Department of Education, Office of Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services, Switzer Building, room 3065, 330
C Street, SW., Washington, DC between 10 AM and 12 noon. NIDRR staff
will also be available from 1:30 PM to 4:00 PM on that same day to
provide technical assistance through individual consultation and
information about the funding priority. For further information or to
make arrangements to attend contact Donna Nangle, Switzer Building,
room 3412, 330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20202. Telephone (202)
205-5880 or via Internet: donna.nangle@ed.gov
If you use a telecommunication device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call (202) 205-4475.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities at the Public Meetings
The meeting site is accessible to individuals with disabilities,
and a sign language interpreter will be available. If you will need an
auxiliary aid or service other than a sign language interpreter in
order to participate in the meeting (e.g., other interpreting service
such as oral, cued speech, or tactile interpreter; assistive listening
device; or materials in alternate format), notify the contact person
listed in this notice at least two weeks before the scheduled meeting
date. Although we will attempt to meet a request we receive after this
date, we may not be able to make available the requested auxiliary aid
or service because of insufficient time to arrange it.
Application Procedures
The Assistant Secretary will reject without consideration or
evaluation any application that proposes a project funding level that
exceeds the stated maximum award amount per year (See 34 CFR
75.104(b)).
The Assistant Secretary strongly recommends the following:
(1) A one-page abstract;
(2) An Application Narrative (i.e., Part III that addresses the
selection criteria that will be used by reviewers in evaluating
individual proposals) of no more 125 pages for Project applications,
double-spaced (no more than 3 lines per vertical inch) 8" x 11" pages
(on one side only) with one inch margins (top, bottom, and sides). The
application narrative page limit recommendation does not apply to: Part
I--the electronically scannable form; Part II--the budget section
(including the narrative budget justification); and Part IV--the
assurances and certifications; and
(3) A font no smaller than a 12-point font and an average character
density no greater than 14 characters per inch.
Instructions for Transmittal of Applications
(a) If an applicant wants to apply for a grant, the applicant
must--
(1) Mail the original and two copies of the application on or
before the deadline date to: U.S. Department of Education, Application
Control Center, Attention: CFDA #84.133E-7 [Applicant must insert
priority name], Washington, DC 20202-4725, or
(2) Hand deliver the original and two copies of the application by
4:30 PM [Washington, DC time] on or before the deadline date to: U.S.
Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: CFDA
#84.133E-7 [Applicant must insert priority name], room #3671, Regional
Office Building #3, 7th and D Streets, SW., Washington, DC.
(b) An applicant must show one of the following as proof of
mailing:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary.
(c) If an application is mailed through the U.S. Postal Service,
the Secretary does not accept either of the following as proof of
mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(1) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
Notes: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a
dated postmark. Before relying on this method, an applicant should
check with its local post office.
(2) An applicant wishing to know that its application has been
received by the Department must include with the application a stamped
self-addressed postcard containing the CFDA number and title of this
program.
(3) The applicant must indicate on the envelope and--if not
provided by the Department--in Item 10 of the Application for Federal
Assistance (Standard Form 424) the CFDA number--and letter, if any--of
the competition under which the application is being submitted.
Application Forms and Instructions
The appendix to this application is divided into four parts. These
parts are organized in the same manner that the submitted application
should be organized. These parts are as follows:
Part I: Application for Federal Assistance (ED 424 (Rev. 11/30/
2004)) and instructions.
Part II: Budget Form--Non-Construction Programs (ED 524) and
instructions.
Part III: Application Narrative.
Additional Materials
Estimated Public Reporting Burden.
Assurances--Non-Construction Programs (Standard Form 424B).
Certification Regarding Lobbying, Debarment, Suspension, and Other
Responsibility Matters: and Drug-Free Work-Place Requirements (ED Form
80-0013).
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and
Voluntary Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED Form 80-0014)
and instructions. (NOTE: ED Form GCS-014 is intended for the use of
primary participants and should not be transmitted to the Department.)
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL (if
applicable) and instructions; and Disclosure Lobbying Activities
Continuation Sheet (Standard Form LLL-A).
An applicant may submit information on a photostatic copy of the
application and budget forms, the assurances, and the certifications.
However, the application form, the assurances, and the certifications
must each have an original signature. No grant may be awarded unless a
completed application form has been received.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Nangle, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3412, Switzer Building,
Washington, DC 20202-2645.
[[Page 41774]]
Telephone: (202) 205-5880 or via Internet: Donna.Nangle@ed.gov
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), may call
the TDD number at (202) 205-4475.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may review this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at
1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(b)(3).
Dated: June 13, 2002.
Robert H. Pasternack,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and, Rehabilitative Services.
Appendix
Instructions for Estimated Public Reporting Burden
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, you are not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number
for this collection of information is 1820-0027. Expiration date: 2/
28/2003. We estimate the time required to complete this collection
of information to average 30 hours per response, including the time
to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather the
data needed, and complete and review the collection of information.
If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time
estimate or suggestions for improving this form, please write to:
U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC 20202-4651. If you have
comments or concerns regarding the status of your submission of this
form, write directly to: Donna Nangle, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3412, Switzer Building, Washington,
DC 20202-2645.
Application Forms and Instructions
Applicants are advised to reproduce and complete the application
forms in this section. Applicants are required to submit an original
and two copies of each application as provided in this section.
However, applicants are encouraged to submit an original and seven
copies of each application in order to facilitate the peer review
process and minimize copying errors.
Frequent Questions
1. Can I Get an Extension of the Due Date?
No. On rare occasions the Department of Education may extend a
closing date for all applicants. If that occurs, a notice of the
revised due date is published in the Federal Register. However,
there are no extensions or exceptions to the due date made for
individual applicants.
2. What Should Be Included in the Application?
The application should include a project narrative, vitae of key
personnel, and a budget, as well as the Assurances forms included in
this package. Vitae of staff or consultants should include the
individual's title and role in the proposed project, and other
information that is specifically pertinent to this proposed project.
The budgets for both the first year and all subsequent project years
should be included.
If collaboration with another organization is involved in the
proposed activity, the application should include assurances of
participation by the other parties, including written agreements or
assurances of cooperation. It is not useful to include general
letters of support or endorsement in the application.
If the applicant proposes to use unique tests or other
measurement instruments that are not widely known in the field, it
would be helpful to include the instrument in the application.
Many applications contain voluminous appendices that are not
helpful and in many cases cannot even be mailed to the reviewers. It
is generally not helpful to include such things as brochures,
general capability statements of collaborating organizations, maps,
copies of publications, or descriptions of other projects completed
by the applicant.
3. What Format Should Be Used for the Application?
NIDRR generally advises applicants that they may organize the
application to follow the selection criteria that will be used. The
specific review criteria vary according to the specific program, and
are contained in this Consolidated Application Package.
4. May I Submit Applications to More Than One NIDRR Program
Competition or More Than One Application to a Program?
Yes, you may submit applications to any program for which they
are responsive to the program requirements. You may submit the same
application to as many competitions as you believe appropriate. You
may also submit more than one application in any given competition.
5. What Is the Allowable Indirect Cost Rate?
The limits on indirect costs vary according to the program and
the type of application. An applicant for an RRTC is limited to an
indirect rate of 15%. An applicant for a DRRP should limit indirect
charges to the organization's approved indirect cost rate. If the
organization does not have an approved indirect cost rate, the
application should include an estimated actual rate.
6. Can Profitmaking Businesses Apply for Grants?
Yes. However, for-profit organizations will not be able to
collect a fee or profit on the grant, and in some programs will be
required to share in the costs of the project.
7. Can Individuals Apply for Grants?
No. Only organizations are eligible to apply for grants under
NIDRR programs. However, individuals are the only entities eligible
to apply for fellowships.
8. Can NIDRR Staff Advise Me Whether My Project Is of Interest to
NIDRR or Likely To Be Funded?
No. NIDRR staff can advise you of the requirements of the
program in which you propose to submit your application. However,
staff cannot advise you of whether your subject area or proposed
approach is likely to receive approval.
9. How Do I Assure That My Application Will Be Referred to the Most
Appropriate Panel for Review?
Applicants should be sure that their applications are referred
to the correct competition by clearly including the competition
title and CFDA number, including alphabetical code, on the Standard
Form 424, and including a project title that describes the project.
10. How Soon After Submitting My Application Can I Find Out If It
Will Be Funded?
The time from closing date to grant award date varies from
program to program. Generally speaking, NIDRR endeavors to have
awards made within five to six months of the closing date.
Unsuccessful applicants generally will be notified within that time
frame as well. For the purpose of estimating a project start date,
the applicant should estimate approximately six months from the
closing date, but no later than the following September 30.
11. Can I Call NIDRR To Find Out If My Application Is Being Funded?
No. When NIDRR is able to release information on the status of
grant applications, it will notify applicants by letter. The results
of the peer review cannot be released except through this formal
notification.
12. If My Application Is Successful, Can I Assume I Will Get the
Requested Budget Amount in Subsequent Years?
No. Funding in subsequent years is subject to availability of
funds and project performance.
[[Page 41775]]
13. Will All Approved Applications Be Funded?
No. It often happens that the peer review panels approve for
funding more applications than NIDRR can fund within available
resources. Applicants who are approved but not funded are encouraged
to consider submitting similar applications in future competitions.
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
[[Page 41776]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.006
[[Page 41777]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.007
[[Page 41778]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.008
[[Page 41779]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.009
[[Page 41780]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.010
[[Page 41781]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.011
[[Page 41782]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.012
[[Page 41783]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.013
[[Page 41784]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.014
[[Page 41785]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.015
[[Page 41786]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.016
[[Page 41787]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.017
[[Page 41788]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.018
[[Page 41789]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN02.019
[FR Doc. 02-15394 Filed 6-18-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-C