Screen Printing Home | About
This Project | Findings & Accomplishments | Publications
| Partners
The DfE Screen Printing Partnership activities focused on three
main areas:
Half of the screen printers involved with DfE have switched to
cleaner reclamation systems. Several suppliers also have adjusted
their research and development strategies to incorporate DfE principles.
Screen Reclamation Technologies
The DfE Screen Printing Partnership completed a comparison of the
environmental and human health risk, performance, and cost of 16
substitute screen reclamation product systems and technologies.
The project collected hazard and environmental release information
(i.e., releases to air, water, land) on 72 different chemicals that
were found in these screen reclamation systems. With this information,
the project assessed the risks to human health and the environment
posed by the substitute product systems and technologies.
Performance was evaluated in two phases:
- The Screen Printing Technical Foundation's laboratory evaluated
the products under control conditions.
- Field demonstrations at volunteer printers' facilities provided
performance information under "real world" production
conditions.
Twenty-three screen printing shops volunteered to use a substitute
product system for one month. The participating printers recorded
the amount of product used, the length of time needed to reclaim
the screens, and their opinion of how well the product cleaned the
screen.
The information collected in the performance demonstration was
used to develop cost data for each of the demonstrated product systems
and technologies. The Screen Printing Project also identified simple
workplace practice changes that printers can implement easily and
inexpensively. In addition, new methods and technologies were examined
that might help printers improve the bottom line while reducing
human health and environmental impacts.
Information on the comparative risk, performance, and cost of each
of the substitute product systems and technologies are contained
in a summary booklet, Designing
Solutions for Screen Printers, and in a full technical report,
Screen Reclamation Cleaner Technologies
Substitutes Assessment (CTSA).
Pollution Prevention Opportunities
The DfE Program conducted a national survey of 305 screen printers
via telephone in 1996. Assessing the state of pollution prevention
(P2) activities in the screen printing industry and identifying
factors that motivated screen printers to implement these activities
were the survey's primary goals. Key results are highlighted below.
Factors That Motivate Work Practice Changes:
- Worker safety was the most commonly reported reason for changing
ink, haze, or emulsion removal methods; process/quality improvements
was the second most common response. For example, 51 percent of
small firms and 32 percent of large firms changed ink removal
methods as a result of worker safety, while 31 percent and 24
percent, respectively, changed methods to improve quality.
- Product suppliers were the most useful, the most trusted, and
the most commonly cited source of information for printers that
had changed methods or that had considered changing methods. Specifically,
30 percent of all firms indicated that suppliers were the most
trusted source of information.
P2 Opportunities in the Screen Printing Industry:
- The majority of screen printers reclaim screens on-site. Most
screen printers that remove ink, emulsion, and/or haze use acceptable
work practices, such as dipping a rag or a brush into a container
and then wiping the screen clean. Far fewer screen printers report
using more preferred methods for cleaning screens, however, such
as spraying removal chemicals from a tank or bottle, or using
specialized spray equipment.
- Numerous screen printers use disposable or reusable rags for
loosening and removing ink from the screen. Encouraging printers
to recapture the chemical residue from these rags before either
disposing of them or cleaning them could reduce chemical releases
into the environment.
- The majority of screen printers use ink degradents and/or screen
degreasers. Degreasers are detergent-like products that are not
particularly harmful, while ink degradents are solvent-based products
that release volatile organic chemicals. Some environmentally
preferable ink degradents do exist, however, and present P2 alternatives.
- Very few screen printers filter/distill, reuse, or recycle waste
chemicals from ink, emulsion, or haze removal.
- Most screen printers use a disposal service. Although survey
respondents were not questioned as to whether their service providers
reprocess waste chemicals, printers could be encouraged to use
services that do so.
- Worker safety, followed by quality improvement, were the most
cited reasons that screen printers changed ink, emulsions, or
haze removal methods and practices. Furthermore, worker health
concerns, along with ecological, performance, and cost factors,
were identified as the most effective incentives in persuading
firms to adopt additional P2 techniques.
back to top
|