skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 8, 2009   
DOL > EBSA > Newsroom > Fact Sheet
DOL Home

Fact Sheet: MEWA Enforcement

Printer Friendly Version

U.S. Department of Labor
Employee Benefits Security Administration
October 2008

Background

Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements (MEWAs) provide health and welfare benefits to employees of two or more unrelated employers who are not parties to bona fide collective bargaining agreements. In concept, MEWAs are designed to give small employers access to low cost health coverage on terms similar to those available to large employers. For certain employers they represent the only available option for providing employees with health care because insurance companies often will not insure small employers who do not fall within their desirable risk category.

Although MEWAs can be provided through legitimate organizations, they are sometimes marketed using attractive but actuarially unsound premium structures that generate large administrative fees for the promoters. In addition, certain promoters will set up arrangements that they claim are established pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement and, therefore, are not MEWAs but legitimate benefit plans free from state insurance regulations. Often, however, these collective bargaining agreements are nothing more than shams designed to avoid state insurance regulation.

States and the federal government coordinate the regulation of MEWAs pursuant to a 1982 amendment to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). This dual jurisdiction gives states primary responsibility for overseeing the financial soundness of MEWAs and the licensing of MEWA operators. The Department of Labor enforces the fiduciary provisions of ERISA against MEWA operators to the extent a MEWA is an ERISA plan or is holding plan assets. State insurance laws that set standards requiring specified levels of reserves or contributions are applicable to MEWAs even if they also are covered by ERISA.

EBSA Enforcement Efforts

The Department has devoted significant resources to investigating and litigating issues connected with abusive MEWAs created by unscrupulous promoters who sell the promise of inexpensive health benefit insurance, but default on their obligations. Particular emphasis has been put on identifying ongoing abusive and fraudulent MEWAs, and working to shut down such operations.

Enforcement Efforts To Date

To date, the Department has:

  • Initiated 758 civil and 191 criminal investigations and obtained monetary results of over $212 million. There are currently 68 civil and 50 criminal investigations open.

  • Filed 92 civil complaints.

  • Indicted 143 individuals with 112 convictions or guilty pleas.

  • Published technical assistance materials, including a booklet explaining federal and state regulation of MEWAs.

  • Issued numerous advisory opinions to assist state prosecutors and regulators to enforce state insurance laws against MEWAs.

  • Convicted individuals have been sentenced to total prison terms of approximately 400 years. Most of these investigations have been jointly investigated with other agencies, including the Department’s Office of Labor Racketeering and Fraud Investigations, the FBI, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigative Division.

Recent Civil Litigation Cases

Manufacturing and Industrial Workers Union (MIWU) Benefit Fund – On March 28, 2007, the Department filed a complaint against Bryan, Texas-based Manufacturing and Industrial Workers Union Benefit Fund and against four trustees of the Paramount, California-based International Union of Public and Industrial Workers (IUPIW) Canadian Benefit Fund: William Hope, Gary Couch, Roger “Tim,” Gue, and Robby Larkin; and Pamela Barlow, Secretary-Treasurer of the related IUPIW, for their role in causing the financial collapse and ultimate demise of the MIWU Fund in 2005. The action was filed in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, in an effort to secure the MIWU Fund assets, protect the plan participants and halt alleged ongoing violations of federal law. The Department’s suit alleged that the defendants mismanaged the Fund by admitting large groups of participants into uninsured medical plans without any underwriting and by failing to set contribution rates sufficient to fund the benefits offered in violation of ERISA. Further, the complaint alleged that the IUPIW Fund officials illegally transferred millions in unprocessed and unpaid claims from the IUPIW Canadian Benefit Fund in an effort to preserve IUPIW Canadian Benefit Fund solvency to the detriment of the MIWU Fund. The MIWU Fund allegedly owes more than $4.8 million in unadjudicated and unpaid health care claims for approximately 2000 workers and their families in Georgia, Illinois, Texas, Arizona and other states. The lawsuit sought restoration of Fund losses, the appointment of an independent fiduciary and other equitable relief.

On May 11, 2007, the Department obtained a consent judgment appointing an independent fiduciary and barring the defendant from continuing to act in a fiduciary capacity with respect to any employee health benefit plan subject to ERISA, including the MIWU Fund. The independent fiduciary will terminate the MIWU Fund and collect, marshal, and administer any remaining assets, and will process and pay claims. Participants with health claims or questions should contact Betty Cordial, the independent fiduciary, at (602) 240-6821.

Contractors and Merchants Association (CMA) and Small and Independent Business Associates, Inc. (SIBA) – The Department sued a purported employer association, a health fund trustee, and the fund’s consultant over alleged imprudent management of the Manufacturing and Industrial Workers Benefit Fund (MIWU) of Bryan, Texas. The defendants’ actions allegedly resulted in more than $3.4 million in unpaid health claims affecting participants in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Texas and other states.

According to the lawsuit, Raymond Palombo, Mitchel Coneley, Leonard Steinberg, Contractors and Merchants Association (CMA), and the Small and Independent Business Associates Inc. (SIBA) violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by causing the insolvency of the MIWU health fund and by their failure to hold the fund assets in trust. The defendants permitted Palombo to transfer the health claim liabilities of members of his alleged sham employer association, CMA, to the MIWU fund. Palombo allegedly diverted plan assets to benefit him, the defendants and others; improperly set contribution rates for 880 participants of CMA; enrolled ineligible individuals in the health fund; and failed to properly fund the plan.

The MIWU health fund became financially insolvent in 2005 due to the transfer of CMA members to the fund. At the time of the improper actions, Palombo was the president and sole shareholder of CMA, and Steinberg was the president of SIBA and provided consulting services to the MIWU health fund through SIBA. Coneley was the fund’s trustee.

The amended complaint, filed July 2, 2008 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta, seeks to have the defendants restore to the fund all losses with interest, undo all prohibited transactions, offset any claims for benefits against the MIWU fund, and permanently bar the defendants from serving in a fiduciary capacity to any ERISA-covered plan in the future. In related Department litigation, the court appointed an independent fiduciary to pay health claims of affected participants and beneficiaries and to manage the more than $1.9 million in fund assets recovered by the Department and collected by the independent fiduciary as of May 2008.

Georgia Plumbers Trade Association for Continuing Education, Inc. (GPTA) – On March 15, 2007, the Department filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, against Marc Meixner, Leslie E. Smith, David Sherman, GPTA Benefits Group, Inc. and Employers Onesource, Inc. The plan sponsor, Georgia Plumbers Trade Association for Continuing Education, Inc. (GPTA), located in Griffin, Georgia, is a non-profit organization established in 1994 to provide plumbers in the state of Georgia with education and resources to comply with changing plumbing codes.

The complaint alleges that the defendants mismanaged the GPTA Health Plan by paying illegal commissions and fees and by failing to pay plan benefits when due. As a result, $646,875 in benefits has allegedly not been paid. The suit seeks a court order requiring that the defendants restore all plan losses with interest and return any illegal profits. The suit also seeks to permanently bar the defendants from serving any employee benefit plan governed by ERISA in the future and to appoint an independent fiduciary to manage the plan and its assets.

On January 15, 2008, the Court entered a consent judgment and order requiring Marc Meixner to restore $509,624 to the Georgia Plumbers Trade Association Health Plan. On February 5, 2008, the Department filed a Complaint against the Georgia Plumbers Trade Association, Ron Anderson and Windell Peters.

Employers Resource Management, Inc – On March 16, 2006, a final judgment and consent order was filed in Chao v. Employers Resource Management Company, Inc. (ERM). ERM, headquartered in Boise, Idaho, sponsors a self-funded multiple employer welfare arrangement for small employers located in several states. The consent order requires that ERM maintain a minimum level of reserves for the payment of medical claims. ERM has contributed approximately $588,000 to fund such a reserve pursuant to the agreement reached with the Department. ERM also agreed to hire qualified professionals to annually compute the amount the claims reserves must hold. The settlement also provides that ERM will forward employer and employee premiums to the health plan as soon as those monies can be segregated from its general assets, will separately hold in trust and account for the health plan’s assets and will use the plan’s assets only to pay proper claims and expenses. ERM also agreed to invest the plan’s assets prudently and reimburse itself only for direct expenses in accordance with federal law.

Solidarity of Labor Organization International Union (SOLO) – On January 9, 2006, the District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a consent judgment specifically and permanently enjoining Anthony Pecone from serving as a fiduciary or service provider of any employee benefit plan and from marketing or selling participation in employee benefit plans. Pecone’s employer association, the National Entrepreneurs Association (NEA), required employers to pay a per capita fee to NEA for each of their employees in order to obtain coverage in the Solidarity of Labor Organization International Union Benefit Fund (Fund). Pecone’s employer association allegedly diverted approximately $1.3 million in plan assets in the form of employer association fees from employers seeking health benefits for their employees from the Fund. The Fund filed for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and the Secretary’s Consent Judgment acknowledged that the bankruptcy trustee of the Fund would continue to prosecute the claim of alleged diversion of plan assets against Mr. Pecone in the adversary complaint filed by the bankruptcy trustee.

ePEO Link, Inc. and Integrated Professional Insurance Services, Inc. (IPIS) – On December 1, 2005, the Department filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma, against ePEO Link, Inc. and Integrated Professional Insurance Services, Inc. (IPIS) charging those companies with violating ERISA in managing the ePEO Link Group Accident and Health ERISA Medical Care Plan, a multiple employer welfare arrangement (MEWA). Also named in the complaint were Roger Jeffrey, Jacqueline Holovka, and Frederick Roh, principals of ePEO Link, a Professional Employer Organization headquartered in Idaho, and Lon Olmstead, principal of IPIS, the MEWA's third-party administrator located in Bakersfield, California.

ePEO Link sponsored the MEWA from April 2001 through June 2003, at which time they terminated the MEWA leaving $4.43 million in unpaid health claims. The complaint alleged that defendants ePEO Link, Jeffrey, Holovka, Roh, IPIS and Olmstead violated ERISA by, among other things, failing to ensure proper underwriting, contribution rates, and reserve levels, failing to obtain appropriate reinsurance, and failing to require that ePEO Link pay all amounts necessary to pay benefits. Defendant Olmstead also was charged with violating ERISA for receiving commissions from the MEWA's purchase of reinsurance contracts.

On June 19, 2006, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma approved the consent order between the Department and ePEO Link, Inc., Integrated Professional Insurance Services, Inc. (IPIS), and the respective principals of those companies. The Consent Order permanently bars ePEO and its principals, Roger Jeffrey, Frederick Roh, and Jacqueline Holovka from serving as fiduciaries or service providers to ERISA plans. The Consent Order also permanently bars IPIS and its principal, Lon Olmstead, from serving as fiduciaries or service providers to ERISA Plans. The consent order is conditioned on each settling defendant adhering to the terms of a separate Class Action Settlement Agreement filed in the matter of Envirosolve, LLC, et al v. ePEO Link, Inc. et al.

International Union of Public and Industrial Workers (IUPIW) Canadian Benefit Fund – On November 30, 2005, the Department filed a complaint against the International Union of Public and Industrial Workers (IUPIW) Canadian Benefit Fund (Fund) in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta Division). The complaint sought payment of over $1.2 million in unpaid medical claims, as well as the appointment of an independent fiduciary to take over operation of the Fund. The suit also sought to bar the current Fund fiduciaries from further involvement with any plans covered by ERISA.

The defendants named in the complaint were the Fund and its fiduciaries, including its four trustees: William Hope (Hope), Gary Couch, Robby Larkin and Roger Gue, as well as Pamela Barlow, Secretary-Treasurer of the Petroleum Workers Union. The complaint alleges that the fiduciaries repeatedly admitted large groups of participants into the Fund's self-funded component even though they knew or had reason to know that many individuals in the groups had serious and/or chronic health conditions and, therefore, posed significant risks to the Fund's solvency. Since at least 2002, the Fund's fiduciaries imprudently failed to set contribution rates commensurate with the level of benefits offered and failed to perform any underwriting activities even when admitting large enrollee groups.

On March 21, 2007, the Department obtained a consent judgment shutting down the International Union of Public and Industrial Workers Canadian Benefit Fund. The judgment also restores $542,727 to pay pending health claims of more than 2,000 workers and families, removes officials from their positions with the Fund, and appoints an independent fiduciary to manage the Fund’s assets of $762,606, terminate the plan and pay health claims. Plan officials must pay a civil monetary penalty and are permanently barred from service to any plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act in the future. Participants with health claims or questions should contact Betty Cordial, the independent fiduciary, at 602-240-6821.

Riscomp Industries, Inc. – On November 10, 2005, the Department filed a complaint in Minnesota U.S. District Court against the executives of Riscomp Industries, Inc. for their imprudent management of the firm's health plan. The health plan was a multiple employer welfare arrangement (MEWA) that provided medical, dental, life and death benefits. The complaint alleges that Robert Wood, Kurt Wood, and David Nelson, who were trustees of the plan, violated ERISA by retaining more than $1.2 million of health plan contributions from employers and employees in the firm's corporate account. When Riscomp filed for bankruptcy protection in November 2002, it left over $2.1 million in unpaid claims.

On February 1, 2007, the Department obtained a consent judgment resolving the Department’s complaint against Riscomp Industries, Inc., Robert Wood, Kurt Wood, David Nelson, and the RJ Associates Employee Benefit Plan and Trust. Under the Judgment, Riscomp, Robert Wood, Kurt Wood and David Nelson were required to pay $512,313 to resolve the unpaid health claims of the MEWA, $207,000 to an independent fiduciary to cover the costs of administering the claims payments, and $102,463 in ERISA civil penalties.

Professional Industrial & Trade Workers Union (PITWU) – On April 28, 2005, the Department filed a complaint against the Professional Industrial & Trade Workers Union (PITWU) Health and Welfare Fund, Michael Garnett, James Doyle, Mark Maccariella, and Cynthia Holloway. The suit alleges that, while serving as fiduciaries with respect to the Fund, these individuals violated ERISA’s exclusive purpose and prudent person provisions. The complaint further alleges that Doyle, Garnett and Macariella breached their fiduciary duties by diverting plan assets from the Fund in the form of commissions, union dues, administrative and billing fees, and other non-specified expenses. The complaint alleges that Holloway breached her fiduciary duties by failing to monitor the proper application of the Fund's assets by her three co-defendants as well as by David Weinstein, the Fund's architect. The complaint also seeks to have the defendants restore losses to the Fund, permanently enjoin the defendants from serving in the future as fiduciaries for ERISA-covered plans, and have the court appoint an independent fiduciary to administer the Fund.

Midland Services, Inc. – On January 5, 2005, the Department sued the president of the Nashville-based Midland Services, Inc. for misusing commissions and refunds owed to a health plan sponsored by the firm. Midland was an employee staff-leasing firm that operated a MEWA for employees leased to client employers.

The suit alleged that Midland and David Starkey violated ERISA when they received $72,721 in illegal commissions and refunds of plan contributions, which were used for their personal benefit rather than to pay participant claims. The defendants allegedly selected a succession of service providers to insure the plan and provide administrative services between 1998 and 2002. In 1999 and 2001, two insurers defaulted on plan payment of claims. The plan provided health benefits to approximately 469 participants under a re-insurance arrangement. In 1999, Merrion Reinsurance Company, Ltd. failed to pay $47,373 in benefit claims. North American Indemnity of Belgium also defaulted on $223,000 in claims in 2001.

On April 20, 2005, a consent judgment was entered permanently barring David Starkey from service as a fiduciary, administrator, or service provider of future ERISA plans. Starkey is further barred from selling or marketing any health benefit arrangement not licensed in one of the 50 states.

New Jersey Licensed Beverage Association – On November 18, 2004, the Department sued the trustees, plan administrators, and other fiduciaries to the New Jersey Licensed Beverage Association health plan in Trenton, New Jersey, for mismanagement of the plan. The self-insured health plan left participants with more than $6 million in unpaid health claims. The plan ceased operating in August 2003.

The lawsuit alleged that the defendants violated ERISA by failing to determine and maintain adequate funding levels to pay benefits from 1998 to 2003, and did not have adequate contribution rates to support benefit payments. The suit names as defendants the New Jersey Licensed Beverage Association, Inc., plan administrator Midlantic Healthcare, Inc., and numerous fiduciaries associated with the plan.

The suit alleged that Midlantic Healthcare, Inc. did not provide information to the plan trustees and fiduciaries regarding the financial condition of the plan, and did not manage the plan in a financially sound manner. The plan fiduciaries allegedly failed to remove Midlantic and its principal and did not properly monitor the actions of the plan administrator. In August of 2003, the plan had an unpaid claim backlog of $6,220,323.

The New Jersey Licensed Beverage Association, Inc. sponsored the medical plan for as many as 3,895 employees who work in bars and restaurants throughout the state of New Jersey and elsewhere. The plan ceased operating in August 2003.

On January 5, 2006, Judge Joel A. Pisano for the United Sates District Court for the District of New Jersey entered a stipulation and order pursuant to the All Writs Act that stays all current federal and state court litigation and enjoins future suits against the plan, its participants, beneficiaries and fiduciaries for unpaid medical claims pending resolution of the Secretary’s suit.

On March 30, 2007, the Department obtained a partial consent judgment ordering the fiduciaries to make restitution of $1.5 million to the New Jersey Licensed Beverage Association Welfare Benefit Plan, less any applicable ERISA Section 502(1) penalties, and an additional $150,000 for the court-appointed independent fiduciary to marshal the plan’s assets, pay unpaid claims and terminate the plan. The judgment also enjoins each of the fiduciaries from serving as a fiduciary or service provider to any ERISA-covered plan based on their mismanagement of the plan. This judgment concludes the litigation and follows an earlier Partial Consent Judgment that was entered last month against Midlantic Healthcare, Inc., operated by co-defendant Stephan DiTomasso. The Midlantic Judgment provided for restitution of $600,000.

International Union of Industrial and Independent Workers Benefit Fund (IUIIW) – On December 13, 2004, the Department entered into a consent judgment and order for payment of $840,000 in restitution to the Paramount, California-based International Union of Industrial and Independent Workers Benefit Fund (Fund).

In September 2004, the Department had obtained a preliminary injunction removing the trustees and permanently barring them from service to the Fund. The order also terminated the Fund and appointed an independent fiduciary to manage the Fund’s assets and to establish a claims procedure for participants.

On April 6, 2004, the Department filed a lawsuit against the purported union, former plan administrator Oak Tree Administrators, its owner Cherille Shelp and current and former trustees Geoffrey J. Beltz, James Miller, David Wright, and Henry Solowiej.

The Department’s suit alleged that the purported union is a MEWA that marketed health benefits to employers in southern and western states. From July 2000 to June 2003, the defendants spent millions of dollars of fund assets on administrative expenses – including several hundred thousand dollars paid to the purported union and more than $1 million to marketers of the arrangement. The Department also alleged that the defendants delayed processing health claims, failed to operate the fund in an actuarially sound manner and paid excessive fees for services provided to the fund.

On September 7, 2005, the Court determined that Cherille Shelp is a fiduciary to the Plan. On September 21, 2005, Ms. Shelp entered into a consent judgment permanently enjoining her from serving as an administrator, fiduciary, officer, trustee custodian, counsel, agent, employee or representative in any capacity to any ERISA-governed plan.

On November 17, 2005, former plan administrator Oak Tree Administrators entered into a consent order, which permanently enjoined and restrained Oak Tree Administrators from violating the provisions of Title I of ERISA and permanently enjoined it from providing third- party administrator services to any ERISA-governed employee benefit plan. Oak Tree Administrators agreed to entry of a judgment in the amount of $1 million.

Provider Medical Trust – On January 30, 2004, the Department sued the fiduciaries of Provider Medical Trust (the Trust), a Tulsa-based MEWA for taking excessive fees and making misrepresentations that resulted in the participants incurring millions of dollars in medical bills while believing they had health plan coverage. Among the parties named in the lawsuit is Johnson Benefit Administrators, LLC, which controlled PMT and managed about 45 self-funded single employer group plans.

The suit sought the removal and a permanent bar of the plan fiduciaries from serving any employee benefit plan governed by ERISA, and asked that the fiduciaries provide an accounting of the excessive fee charges and make full restitution to the plans.

Since January 1, 1996, the defendants misrepresented the Trust’s solvency and caused the Trust to pay excessive service fees to the plan administrator, which was owned by the fiduciaries. The fiduciaries also allegedly misrepresented the Trust’s solvency to meet state insurance solvency requirements and continued to market the Trust without disclosing its true financial situation.

On August 15, 2005, the court ordered defendants Robert Johnson, Jr., and his corporate entities to restore $4,900,000.00 in plan losses to the Provider Medical Trust. Judge Eagan also permanently barred Mr. Johnson and his companies from serving as fiduciaries or service providers to any ERISA-covered plan. In addition, Judge Eagan ordered defendant Bernard J. Westhoff to restore to the plan $50,000, to pay $10,000 in penalties, and to obtain before December 31, 2005, at least ten hours of fiduciary training and education, and thereafter annually obtain at least six hours of such training.

Team America Corporation – On September 15, 2006, the Department filed a complaint against Team America Corporation, Steven Cash Nickerson, Ted Crawford and Andrew Johnson in the United States District for the Southern District of Ohio. It is alleged that Team America Corporation, a Professional Employee Organization, failed to, among other things, remit employee contributions and employer contributions, which Team America received from its client employers, for the payment of insurance premiums.

The suit seeks the removal and a permanent bar of the plan fiduciaries from serving any employee benefit plan governed by ERISA, and asks that the fiduciaries be ordered to make full restitution to the plans, including interest, and correct the alleged prohibited transactions.

On September 6, 2007, the Court entered a Default Judgment against Team America Corporation permanently enjoining Team America Corporation and ordering Team America to restore $2,371,193 to all its plans. On April 25, 2008, the Court entered a Consent Order and Judgment providing for the payment of approximately $950,000 to the plans and 20 hours of fiduciary instruction for Steven Cash Nickerson, Ted Crawford and Andrew Johnson.

Mutual Association Administrators, Inc. (MAA) – On July 30, 2008 the Department obtained a default judgment requiring Huntington, New York-based Mutual Association Administrators (MAA) to restore nearly $1.8 million to the Mutual Employees Benefit Trust (MEBT) and permanently barring the firm from providing service to plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in the future. The judgment resolves a lawsuit filed by the Department in the federal district court in Central Islip, New York.

Mutual Employees Benefit Trust is a multiple employer welfare arrangement that provided health and other welfare benefits to 1,912 participants. Mutual Association Administrators was the plan administrator to MEBT.

The judgment requires MAA to pay $1,779,111 in restitution. The Department sued the defendants on November 15, 2001, alleging that they and 14 other MEBT trustees diverted the trust’s assets to sham labor unions and the corporate defendants.

On May 4, 2002, the Department obtained a preliminary order requiring four of the trustees to resign, barring Leonard and Sharlene Slutsky, Clark Hower, Marketing Motivation Associates Inc., Netscor Inc., VCT Financial Services Inc., and Mutual Association Administrators Inc. from serving or exercising control over any ERISA-covered plan, and appointing an independent fiduciary to oversee MEBT. Under prior consent orders, the court ordered restitution to the plan and permanently barred MEBT’s owner Susan Fisher from serving as a trustee or in any official capacity to any ERISA-covered plan.

Pennsylvania Builders Association (PBA) – On August 25, 2008, the Department obtained a consent judgment in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, in which the Pennsylvania Builders Association (PBA), its wholly-owned subsidiary and its trustees agree to restore $5 million to the fund and pay a civil penalty of $500,000. The judgment also permanently bars the trustees from using plan assets to pay royalties and/or licensing fees to the association, prevents the trustees from contracting with the subsidiary for administrative services in exchange for fees, and prohibits the use of trust assets for lobbying purposes. In addition, current and future trustees must receive eight hours of fiduciary training annually over the next five years.

The lawsuit being resolved alleged that PBA of Lemoyne, Pennsylvania; its wholly-owned subsidiary Builders Services Inc. (BSI); and trustees Robert Basile, Patrick Brewer, Dennis Brislin, Scott Cannon, James Conner, Brad Elliott, Charles Farrell, Chuck Hamilton, David Knipe, Gene Kreitzer, Gary Naeser, Michael Rodino, Toni Rogan, Mack Smith, Chauncey Wirsing, Clarence Yeagley, Jack Zimmer and Roger Zimmer violated their fiduciary duties to the Pennsylvania Builders Association Benefits Trust. PBA sponsored the trust, and BSI was administrator of the trust.

The suit alleges that PBA received royalty payments and BSI received administrative fees under arrangements with BSI and the trust’s third party administrators. The royalties paid to PBA represented a percentage of the administrative fees paid by contributing employers. The Department alleged that these royalty payments were prohibited because the sponsor had provided its name and endorsement to the trust when it created and named the trust. The trustees allegedly misused plan assets to pay royalties to PBA from 2000 to 2007, administrative fees to BSI from 2000 to 2007 and for political lobbying from 2002 through 2004.

The trust provided health, life insurance, dental, vision and temporary disability benefits to 12,616 participants as of 2006.

On September 9, 2008, a federal district court in Atlanta held two former trustees of the California-based International Union of Industrial and Independent Workers Benefit Fund (IUIIW) in civil contempt for failing to comply with a previous court order barring them from serving in a fiduciary capacity to plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

Under the contempt order, Geoffrey Beltz and James Miller are barred from serving in a fiduciary capacity to any plans governed by ERISA; communicating with participants of the IUIIW fund, and marketing, selling and recruiting employers or employees for plans offering benefits under ERISA. Furthermore, to the extent that Beltz or Miller work for any employer, association or labor organization which sponsors an ERISA-covered employee benefit plan in the future, the contempt order requires them to notify the directors and officers of such organizations of the terms and requirements of the contempt order.

Under the 2004 court order, the fund’s trustees were required to pay $840,000 in restitution to the fund and to pay civil penalties to the federal government. The trustees were also barred from serving as plan fiduciaries.

The Department alleged in the 2004 lawsuit that improper actions by Beltz, Miller and other trustees to a health fund sponsored by the International Union of Industrial and Independent Workers resulted in several million dollars in unpaid health claims. The fund, which purported to be a union-sponsored benefit plan, was marketed to employers and individuals in Texas, Georgia, Oklahoma, California and many other states. Several states, including Oklahoma and Georgia, ordered the fund’s operators to stop all insurance-related activities.

Beltz and Miller admitted they later violated the 2004 contempt order by directly or indirectly controlling an ERISA-covered health plan offered by the International Union of Industrial and Independent Workers Local 30, another purported labor organization. The contempt order was entered in federal district court in Atlanta.

Recent Criminal Prosecutions Of Corrupt MEWA Operators

United States v. Garst – On May 21, 2008, Paula Garst was sentenced to 37 months in a federal prison, 36 months of supervised release and ordered to make restitution of $32,341.16 by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas - Amarillo Division. Garst previously pled guilty to one count of health care fraud. Garst was an insurance agent for Direct Marketing Inc., a company she started in 2003. She utilized various other company names including Privilege Care, Healthcare Solutions, and Advanced Marketing Group, Inc. when soliciting individuals and small employers to apply for the low cost health insurance. From October 2003 through December 2005, Garst solicited participants to enroll in a health plan by means of false and fraudulent misrepresentations. Garst falsified participants’ status as group employees of a fictitious company and inflated premium costs which she collected and diverted for her own use. Garst also forged the endorsement on payroll checks that were issued to "employees" from the staffing agencies and deposited the proceeds into bank accounts under her care and control.

United States v. Graf – On February 5, 2007, James Graft, 45, was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison and was ordered to pay more than $20 million in restitution for collecting millions of dollars in premiums from people who thought they were insured, but were left facing more than $20 million in unpaid claims when Employers Mutual was shut down. Graft was found guilty of federal fraud charges for bilking the customers of Employers Mutual , LLC, a company that purported to provide health care coverage to more than 20,000 people across the United States but left more than $20 million in unpaid claims for medical services when it was shut down. The jury returned a guilty verdict on 23 of 28 felony counts alleged in the superseding indictment. The jury found James Graft, formerly of Canyon Lake, California, guilty of one count of conspiracy, five counts of mail fraud, six counts of money laundering, ten counts of misappropriation in connection with a health benefit program, and one count of obstruction of justice in the grand jury investigation.

United States v. Manney, et al. – On June 9, 2006, Dr. Maruthi S. Manney, 48, of Montgomery Village, Maryland, was sentenced to three years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release and his wife, Lakshmi Manney, age 46, was sentenced to 21 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release after being convicted of mail fraud. Dr. Manney also was convicted of one count of wire fraud. The Manneys were ordered to pay restitution of $615,932.71.

Dr. Maruthi Manney, and his wife Lakshmi Manney were convicted after a three-week trial of various counts of wire and mail fraud stemming from their operation of a health benefit plan they co-founded known as SAI Plus. Dr. Manney was convicted of one count of wire fraud and 8 counts of mail fraud. Lakshmi Manney was convicted of 8 counts of mail fraud. Dr. Manney and Lakshmi Manney executed a scheme to defraud several employer groups in Texas who sought health insurance for their employees. The defendants made numerous misrepresentations regarding the health benefit plan: Dr. Manney falsely told the various employer groups that SAI Plus was a licensed third-party administrator in Texas; that the plan would process and pay claims within 30 to 60 days; and that SAI Plus would obtain excess loss coverage for each group, and maintain a separate trust account for each group’s health care contributions. Lakshmi Manney was in charge of the claims department. SAI Plus routinely processed the claims and printed the checks, but kept the printed checks in a file cabinet and later in a locked office. Both defendants face a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment for each count of mail fraud and a $250,000 fine. Dr. Manney also faces a maximum penalty of 5 years for the wire fraud count.

United States v. Steven Edwards – On June 13, 2006, Steven Edwards was sentenced to 150 months imprisonment, fined $100,000 and ordered to pay restitution of $4.56 million. On February 21, 2006, Steven Edwards pled guilty to orchestrating a scheme to defraud his employees, clients and their employees, various insurance companies, and health care providers out of millions of dollars paid to him for the purpose of obtaining and maintaining workers’ compensation insurance and a health care benefits program. Instead, Edwards diverted money paid to him for personal uses. Edwards operated three employee leasing companies or professional employer organizations with offices in Topeka, Kansas, and Durham, North Carolina, with clients in at least 10 states. Edwards’ actions left thousands of people with millions of dollars of unpaid health care. Victims of Edwards’ scheme are located in states across the nation, including North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida and Michigan.

United States v. Joseph Crowley – On February 20, 2007, Joseph Crowley was sentenced to 50 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release for health care fraud. Crowley committed health care fraud while he was the owner and CEO of Healthcare Economics Group (HEG). HEG, which was based in Hilton Head, was a holding company for eight companies located in numerous states. On March 13, 2006, in the District of South Carolina, Joseph Crowley, formerly the owner and CEO of Healthcare Economics Group (HEG), was an administrator of medical benefits for employers that self insure. Crowley, while acting as CEO of HEG, converted more than $4.5 million from the company’s claims accounts to the operating accounts and used the funds for company expenses. HEG collected more than $225 million per year in payments for medical benefits for approximately 35,000 workers. Crowley used his access to the plan’ accounts to transfer the funds. Crowley pled guilty to one count of 18 USC 1347, health care fraud.

United States v. Ben Zander– On June 28, 2006, the U.S. District Court in Trenton, New Jersey sentenced the former attorney of default Meridian Benefits of Wayne, New Jersey, to 21 months in prison and a year of supervised release, and barred him from service to employee benefit plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Attorney Ben Zander and Meridian Benefits former owner Donald Ruth also were ordered to jointly make restitution of $24,678,000. Meredith Benefits was established by Ruth as a third-party administrator to health benefit plans, but, instead operated as a health plan. The company accepted contributions and paid benefit claims from its own accounts. In 2005, Ruth pleaded guilty to mail fraud and tax evasion and admitted to using employee benefit plan assets to purchase a Florida home and a boat and for other expenses while failing to pay health claims. This resulted in more than $15 million in unpaid health claims for 2,800 workers. He also deceived the workers by providing them with false information assuring them claims would be paid. Attorney Zander pleaded guilty in September 2005 to being and accessory after the fact to mail fraud and assisting in concealing the fraud. He admitted to knowing about Ruth’s false statements. Ruth was separately sentenced in April 2006 to seven years in prison for his role in the health care scheme. He also was permanently barred from serving in a fiduciary capacity to any employee benefit plan in the future.

This fact sheet has been developed by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Washington, DC 20210.  It will be made available in alternate formats upon request: Voice phone: 202.693.8664; Text telephone: 1.202.501.3911.  In addition, the information in this fact sheet constitutes a small entity compliance guide for purposes of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.