July 30, 2008
The loaners, by your rules, must locate stock to borrow before loaning.
The loaners do not even have the decency to tell the OWNER,
I am loaning your stock even thought this may hurt you.
This naked short knows something you do not know so it is OK. What????
If I do not pay my bill, my broker will sell what it has to get the money necessary. Period.
Why does this not apply to naked shorts as well as to shorts?
Why are naked shortys deserving of special care?
Surely loaners have the records.
You know by SHO present accounts.
Loaners may even be lying about this.
What are you waiting for?
Providing Liquidity is a phantom hoax of the naked short.
naked shorts only sell, not buy. It takes buyers to have liquidity.
ONLY if shorts buy, could shorts say we provide liquidity:
A short premise is: we will buy after the owner is hurt
naked shorts hope a company goes into bankruptcy, value under $ 50,000 or Senate bailout
so naked shorts do not have to re-buy any stock.
Naked shorts just keep the investors money. Do you think greed has anything to do with this?
Notice no caps for naked short. I do not want to give them any form of respect.
I cannot believe you will allow these people, firms ETC. to
"borrow" beyond a legal limit. Actually they do not even borrow, they counterfeit stock to hurt the real investor without asking him.
How long do you think this can go on?