. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .In reply refer to:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1800B3-DBLANK
ECI License Company, L.P.
c/o Brian M. Madden, Esq.
Leventhal, Senter & Lerman
2000 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20006
Mortenson Broadcasting Company
c/o Jerold D. Miller, Esq.
Miller & Miller, P.C.
1990 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Secret Communications Limited Partnership
SFX Broadcasting, Inc.
c/o Fisher Wayland Cooper Leader & Zaragoza L.L.P.
2001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .In
re:
WDSY, Pittsburgh, PA
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
BAL-961021EB
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
WJJJ(FM), Pittsburgh, PA
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
BALH-961031GK
Dear Ms. Szabo and Counsel:
This concerns the referenced applications for assignment of
license of stations WDSY and WJJJ(FM), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
(WDSY from ECI License Company, L.P. to Mortenson Broadcasting
Company; WJJJ(FM) from Secret Communications Limited Partnership
to SFX Broadcasting, Inc.). The applications were filed October
21, 1996 and were granted December 11, 1996. By letter dated
January 7, 1997, Ms. Karen Eden Szabo filed a letter opposing
grant of the sales applications until a pending sex
discrimination case against WDSY and WJJJ is settled.
Ms. Szabo's objection is untimely. See 47 U.S.C. §309(d)(1)
and 47 C.F.R. §§73.3584 and 73.3587. Furthermore, Ms. Szabo's
objection does not meet the requirements for a petition for
reconsideration. Petitions for reconsideration are controlled
by 47 U.S.C. §405 and 47 C.F.R. §1.106. Section 1.106(b)(1)
provides that non-parties to a proceeding may nevertheless file a
petition for reconsideration where they state with particularity
the manner in which their interests are adversely affected by the
action taken and shows good reason why it was not possible to
participate earlier in the proceeding. Ms. Szabo has not met
this requirement and her objection will be denied.
Moreover, it is the Commission's policy to defer action involving individual complaints of discriminatory practices by broadcast stations to government entities and/or courts established to enforce nondiscrimination laws. The FCC does, of course, take cognizance of a final determination made by an agency or court involving a broadcast licensee. While the Commission considers
sex discrimination and other EEO complaints as part of its
evaluation of a licensee's overall compliance, this evaluation is
based on final agency or judicial decisions. Since no final
decision has been rendered in this case, there would have been
no reason to withhold action on the referenced transfer
applications.
The Commission's EEO rule requires broadcast licensees to afford
equal employment opportunity to all qualified persons and to
refrain from discriminating in employment and benefits on the
basis of race, color, religion, national origin or sex. As part
of the renewal process, a licensee is required to file an EEO
program which provides the Commission with an overview of the
licensee's employment practices as well as detailed EEO related
information. In this regard, the EEO programs and employment
profiles of Pennsylvania radio stations, including WDSY/WJJJ will
be reviewed with the license renewal process that will begin
April 1, 1998. These EEO reviews occur with renewals, not
transfer of licenses. If review reveals that deficiencies exist,
the Commission will take appropriate action.
Also, the public may file petitions to deny an application for
renewal of a broadcast license. Section 73.3584 of the
Commission's Rules specifies that, to be timely, a petition to
deny must be filed by the last day for filing a mutually
exclusive application, which is 30 days before the license
expires. Pennsylvania broadcast licenses expire on August 1,
1998. A petition must also present factual allegations supported
by affidavits of persons with personal knowledge of the facts
alleged to show that the grant would be prima facie inconsistent
with our rules.
I hope this has been responsive to your concerns.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sincerely,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Linda
Blair, Chief
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audio Services Division
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mass Media
Bureau