WPC\B 2IBT##|d)CourierNew (TT)Arial (Bold) (TT)P\  P6Q DXP#CourierHelvetica Bold (Bold) (TT)RomanQ@VX@CourierHelvetica BoldTimes Roman)RomanTimes New Roman (TT)#2;({ ZCourier New (TT)Times New Roman (TT)HP LaserJet 4 PostScript in room 324HPLA4POS.PRSd  @8;hhhh9a@zC8C^dCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddCN8ddddY`(`l2CC!CCPRCddYYYYYYzYzYzYzYC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddoddYYYYYzYzYzYddddddPdCdCCCdNdz8zRdddCRoNoNNF2[dCYddddd7>d<d<CCYYdCCddCYCdYzzzzCCCCqodYYYYYYYYYYY8888dddddddndddddddX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:B#|dCourierHelvetica BoldTimes RomanTimes Roman Bold Roman (TT)Arial (TT)\}U@CourierHelvetica BoldTimes RomanTimes Roman BoldHelveticaXCourierUnivers BoldTimes New RomanTimes New Roman BoldUnivers2KXj  KTr5dddd6X@K@Y9RD=2p}wCZm)S2& sS\  PCPm)W2&#dW4  p(ACCS-`CK3S-`CT#CC,,W]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN0PP0=C-;CCCCC%+eeC(+eeCe(--;;C..PCCQe0PP0OooKK-;Cp("XXXXee{CePMHCKPPC"S^DRtڱDRR_DRDDRRﱱḎ磣RDRDRDDDږ_R{_E_RDRR)RRRRRRRRRRDڱDDDDDDDDRRRRDRDRRRD___RRR翣{{NVDR[ŸRR:{{RRD{R]]]]]]]]]]]]xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN0PP0GC-CCCCCC(-eeC(-ccCe(--CCC..PCCQe0PP0TooKK-CCp("XXXXee{CePOHCKPPC"S^88Goo,CCNu8C88oooooooooo88uuuo˅z8dozz888^o,oodoo8oo,,d,ooooCd8oddddC4CuC8CC!CCCCCCCCCCz8oooooȲdoooo88888888ooooooooodoozodooooddddooooooooooooCzCzCC8zdCdo,oCoCoCo,oooooȽCCCddddzCzCzCoooodzdzdNF8koCzoooooJIoCoC&CCoCCoodd,CCuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNsk{ssscR1\mRgRKllRwgANoЩ7NN[ANAANN㩩A©ܜNANNNAAAЏ[Nu[A[Au邂NN鯯AAuuRNNܯANANVN]NNNANNUÏ驜AAAAЂAAAAddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNuNy__Y[uuYNNuuVVuuuNuuY"uuC uNNNupNucuuuNNNNuulA<uupllNNNNuhN /;k  PP9~~+k~~KkKk&&pY"S^&2SKK}222KV&2&*KKKKKKKKKK22VVVKldlld\uu:Kudlu\ulSdlllld2*2WK2KSCSC2KS*2S*}SKSSC:2SKlKKC;!;N2&222222222222S*lKlKlKlKlKllCdCdCdCdC:*:*:*:*lSuKuKuKuKlSlSlSlSlKlKlSuKuKlKlK\SlKlKlClClClClSdCdCdCdCuKuKuKuKuKuSuS:S:S:2:SK2uSd*d2d2d2d*lSlSlSuKuKllClClCS:S:S:S:d2d2d2lSlSlSlSllKdCdCN5&QK2KKKKKK-2qqK-ppKq-*KKK22KKSS2K-tVVRRVVZZ&<V){kJ%>sk{ssscR1\mRgRSllRwg 3 3C?LO ,,3R R F?????????? LRL9V?FCFC?IL#0F9OIFFFF?dYzzzzCCCCqodYYYYYYYYYYY8888dddddddndddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNd||Choo||~QQ|LLdd|LCCdd~JJ~~zzdddzzCddL"djd9 dCCvCd|o~dC~d~skzUvdYYCCCCo~kodks]zUsk80dhoo~UssvkvvY~]k`sC~koCC~~~~~~~CsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L2X:L".L|0 L3\6"S^2CRddCCCdq2C28dddddddddd88qqqYzoCNzoozzC8C^dCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddCN8ddddY`(`lC2CC!CCCCCCCCCCd8YYYYYYzYzYzYzYC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddodYYYYYYdzYzYzYzYdddddddCdCdCCCdNCdz8zCzCzCz8dddddCCCoNoNoNoNzCzCzCdddddzYzYNF2[dCYddddd7>d<d<$YYdCCddooCY v\ yO- xԍ #C\  P6QP#In its Petition, fn 5, p.8, WUCI requests a waiver, if needed of Section 73.3534. WUCI fails to provide  yO- xproper authority for its waiver request, and that request is denied. See Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship v. FCC,  yO - x452 F. 2d 664, 666 (D.C. Cir. 1968) (per curiam) (the burden is on the applicant seeking a waiver to plead specific facts and circumstances which would warrant a waiver). >  XH-Discussion. WUCI's Petition for Reconsideration fails to point to any error in our earlier decision or to present any new  X1-facts that would support a different result. See 47 C.F.R. Section 1.106(d)(2). WUCI argues that the ruling in La Paz  X -Wireless, Ltd., Letter of Clay C. Pendarvis, Chief, Television Branch, Video Services Division, MMB, August 8, 1994,  X -produced a different result in circumstances that WUCI cannot distinguish from its own. In La Paz Wireless the Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") held that the permittee could not build on its specified transmitter site due to a decision regarding the site by the BLM that barred new antenna construction there. The letter decision found that the permittee in  X -La Paz Wireless met the criteria in Section 73.3534(b)(3) because its progress was blocked by circumstances beyond its control. These circumstances are clearly distinguishable from WUCI's, where, WUCI acknowledges, "the specified site  X-was technically and legally available" (Petition, p. 5), but it preferred to look for another site because the replacement site  Xy-would provide a larger coverage area and because the specified site was on fertile farmland. See Tidewater Christian  Xb-Communications Corp., 2 FCC Rcd 2549 (MMB 1987) (unless loss of transmitter site is due to no fault of the permittee, and such is alleged, seeking modification of permit to change transmitter site is not circumstance beyond permittee's control but, rather, private business decision). The Response filed by WUCI contains a Declaration from its president, Terry Hailey, in which he attempts to  X-demonstrate (for the first time) that WUCI made substantial progress during its construction period. Specifically, Mr. Hailey's Declaration states that WUCI ordered amplifiers and monitors during the construction period "with the knowledge that [this equipment] could be used at WAAT, Tiptonville, or at one of the other [WUCI] properties." Even if this equipment were used at another of WUCI's stations, Mr. Hailey asserted, the equipment that it replaced could be used at WAAT(FM). However, even if this information could properly be considered on reconsideration, "it would be of little  X|-probative value in determining whether construction progress [was made]." Mansfield Christian School, 10 FCC Rcd 12,585, 12, !FN 590 (1996) (broadcaster's acquisition of studio equipment for use in unbuilt or existing coowned station not attributable to construction efforts of unbuilt station). For the reasons set forth above, we DENY WUCI's Petition for Reconsideration of our October 27, 1995 decision letter. hSincerely, hLinda Blair, Chief hAudio Services Division  Xh$-hMass Media Bureaup#X}xP7 DFXP#