Printer-Friendly Version
March 2, 2009
Dear Name*:
Enclosed is the response to
your request for an opinion letter signed by the then Acting Wage and Hour Administrator
Alexander J. Passantino on January 16, 2009 and designated as Wage and Hour
Opinion Letter FLSA2009-22. It does not appear that this response was placed
in the mail for delivery to you after it was signed. In any event, we have
decided to withdraw it for further consideration by the Wage and Hour
Division. We will provide a further response in the near future.
The enclosed opinion letter,
and this withdrawal, are issued as official rulings of the Wage and Hour
Division for purposes of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C. § 259. See
29
C.F.R. §§ 790.17(d), 790.19;
Hultgren v. County of Lancaster, Nebraska, 913 F.2d 498, 507 (8th Cir.
1990). Wage and Hour Opinion Letter FLSA2009-22 is withdrawn and may not be
relied upon as a statement of agency policy.
Sincerely,
John L. McKeon
Deputy Administrator for Enforcement
FLSA2009-22
This Opinion Letter is withdrawn.
January 16, 2009
Dear Name*:
This is in response to your inquiry regarding whether, under
the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA),
an employer in a state with a minimum wage lower than the federal minimum wage
and that prohibits the use of a tip credit, may take a tip credit under the
FLSA for the additional amount above the state minimum wage. It is our opinion
that the FLSA does not prohibit an employer in such states from taking a tip
credit for the amount above the state minimum wage.
You represent an association whose members operate
Restaurants in the State of Minnesota. Minnesota law provides that “No
employer may directly or indirectly credit, or utilize gratuities towards
payment of the minimum wage set by this Section or by federal law.” Minn. Stat. § 177.24. You ask whether this statutory provision affects the validity of the
Wage and Hour Division’s (WHD) position that in a situation in which a state
law requires a minimum wage less than the federal minimum wage and forbids a
tip credit, the employer may take a tip credit in the amount of the difference
between state and federal law. See FOH § 30d06(c).
For purposes of FLSA compliance, WHD continues to follow its
position, as set forth in FOH § 30d06(c), that where a state law requires a
minimum wage less than the federal minimum wage and forbids a tip credit, the
employer may nevertheless take a tip credit in the amount of the difference
between state and federal law. Therefore, application of a tip credit in the
amount of the difference between the Minnesota and federal minimum wage would
not be a violation of the FLSA. Although the Minnesota statute purports to
prohibit taking a credit for gratuities “towards the payment of the minimum
wage set . . . by federal law,” that provision in fact has no effect
for purposes of assessing compliance with federal law. We otherwise express no
opinion, however, regarding the validity or application of Minn. Stat.
§ 177.24 as a matter of state law.
This opinion is based exclusively on the facts and
circumstances described in your request and is given based on your
representation, express or implied, that you have provided a full and fair
description of all the facts and circumstances that would be pertinent to our
consideration of the question presented. Existence of any other factual or
historical background not contained in your letter might require a conclusion
different from the one expressed herein. You have represented that this
opinion is not sought by a party to pending private litigation concerning the
issues addressed herein. You have also represented that this opinion is not
sought in connection with an investigation or litigation between a client or
firm and the Wage and Hour Division or the Department of Labor.
We trust that this letter is responsive to your inquiry.
Sincerely,
Alexander J. Passantino
Acting Administrator
*
Note: The actual name(s) was removed to preserve privacy in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7).
*
Unless otherwise noted, any statutes, regulations, opinion letters, or other
interpretive material cited in this letter can be found at
www.wagehour.dol.gov.
|