UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 39164 / September 30, 1997 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-9465 ) ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS, In the Matter of ) MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING ) REMEDIAL SANCTIONS MARK A. RITACCO, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ) ) I. The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate and in the public interest to institute public administrative proceedings pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against Mark A. Ritacco ("Ritacco" or "Respondent"). In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Ritacco has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") which the Commission has determined to accept. Without admitting or denying the findings contained herein, except that Respondent admits the jurisdiction of the Commission over him and over the subject matter of these proceedings, and further admits the entry of the injunction set forth in paragraph II.B below, Ritacco consents to the issuance of this Order Instituting Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions ("Order"). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that proceedings pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act be, and hereby are, instituted. ======END OF PAGE 1====== II. On the basis of this Order and the Respondent's Offer, the Commission makes the following findings. A. Respondent Ritacco, age 35, resides in Lake Oswego, Oregon. Ritacco was a registered representative for three registered broker-dealers from 1985 through 1992. Beginning in 1992, Ritacco was the founder, president and sole shareholder of Integrated Wealth Management, Inc. ("Integrated"), an Oregon corporation that was registered with the Commission as an investment adviser from 1992 through August 30, 1996. In July 1993, the state of Oregon's Department of Insurance and Finance found that Ritacco had sold unregistered securities and issued an order prohibiting him from transacting business in Oregon in violation of state securities laws, imposing conditions upon his use of exemptions from Oregon State registration, and imposing a $3,000 civil penalty. In February 1994, the National Association of Securities Dealers censured and fined Ritacco $2,500 for "selling away" while at a registered broker-dealer and for lying to the NASD staff in the course of its investigation. B. On September 10, 1997, a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction and Other Legal and Equitable Relief ("Final Judgment") was entered against Ritacco by the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in the case entitled Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mark A. Ritacco et al., Civ. No. CV 97-1307 ST, enjoining him from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 204, 206(1), 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") and Rules 204-1(b)(1) and 206(4)-4 thereunder. Ritacco had consented to the entry of the Final Judgment without admitting or denying any of the allegations contained in the Complaint, except as to jurisdiction which he admitted. C. The Commission's complaint in the above action alleged the following facts with regard to Ritacco. From May 1992 through March 1993 Ritacco primarily through Integrated offered and sold approximately $1,600,000 in high risk promissory notes issued by three start-up companies owned by third parties to 45 advisory clients residing in Oregon, Utah and Washington. Ritacco misrepresented to clients that the promissory notes were as safe as bank certificates of deposit or money market mutual funds but had a higher rate of return. In addition, Ritacco caused Integrated to fail to amend its Form ADV to disclose: (1) Ritacco's disciplinary history; and (2) the fact that Ritacco had assumed marketing responsibilities for one of the companies for whom he sold promissory notes. Ritacco also acted as an unregistered broker-dealer in selling the promissory notes. In addition from June 1993 through November 1995, Ritacco offered and sold in part through Integrated approximately $582,000 in promissory notes issued by three Oregon corporations that Ritacco controlled to 15 investors and clients. From February 1994 through December 1995, Ritacco misrepresented the intended use of proceeds and improperly diverted approximately $248,600 or 43% of these offerings to a fourth Oregon corporation which Ritacco also controlled. III. In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions specified by Ritacco in his Offer. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that: Mark A. Ritacco be, and hereby is, barred from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, investment company or municipal securities dealer. By the Commission. Jonathan G. Katz Secretary ======END OF PAGE 3======