UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 38661 / May 21, 1997 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-9311 ______________________________ ) ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC In the Matter of ) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS ) PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(b) ) AND 19(h) OF THE SECURITIES JAMES G. FREEMAN, ) EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, ) MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING Respondent. ) REMEDIAL SANCTIONS ______________________________) I. The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative proceedings be instituted pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) against James G. Freeman (Freeman). In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, Freeman has submitted an Offer of Settlement which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to jurisdiction and those facts set forth in paragraphs II.A., B. and C. below, which are admitted, Freeman consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions. Accordingly, it is ordered that proceedings pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Exchange Act be, and hereby are, instituted. II. On the basis of this Order and the Offer of Settlement submitted by Freeman, the Commission makes the following findings:<(1)> <(1)> The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent Freeman's Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding. A. Freeman, 69 years old, at all relevant times resided in San Mateo, California, and served as President of Freeman Financial Services Corp., a broker-dealer which has been registered with the Commission since 1986. Freeman also was the President of James G. Freeman & Associates, Inc., an insurance agency headquartered in San Mateo, California. Currently, Freeman is an inmate at the U.S. Federal Penitentiary in Lompoc, California. B. In June 1996, Freeman was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri of two counts of wire fraud (18 U.S.C. 1343) and two counts of monetary transactions with unlawfully derived property (18 U.S.C. 1957). United States v. James G. Freeman, et al., No. S1-4:95 CR 186 (JCH). The conviction resulted from activities relating to Freeman's organization and promotion of a nation-wide Ponzi scheme which fraudulently raised approximately $26 million in proceeds from nearly 500 investors. The Honorable Jean Hamilton sentenced Freeman to 5 years in federal prison. C. On October 11, 1996, Freeman, among others, was enjoined from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder in a case brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Securities and Exchange Commission v. James G. Freeman, et al., Civil Action No. C 96-2316 (WHO). Freeman consented, without admitting or denying the allegations contained in the Commission's Complaint, to the entry of the Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief which included, among other things, an order for an accounting and disgorgement of all ill- gotten gains, including prejudgment interest. D. The Commission's Complaint alleged that in connection with the offer, purchase and sale of securities in the form of promissory notes, raising approximately $26 million from nearly 500 investors, Freeman, directly and indirectly, made misrepresentations and omissions of material fact concerning the nature of the investments, the use of investor proceeds, the payment of commissions, the returns to be generated, and the risks involved. III. In view of the foregoing, it is in the public interest to impose the sanction specified in the Offer of Settlement. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: James G. Freeman be, and hereby is, barred from association with any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, investment adviser or investment company. ======END OF PAGE 2====== By the Commission. Jonathan G. Katz Secretary