| Under the 1992 section 404(q) Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army, Interior can request higher level review of projects that the Fish and Wildlife Service believes will have significant and unacceptable impacts on an aquatic resource of national importance. The process begin with attempts to resolve the issue at the field office level. If unsuccessful, the issue is raised to the Regional level and, finally, to the Washington level. The final decision on the need to elevate a specific individual permit case or policy issue rests with the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works.
Listed below are all of the requests for elevation submitted by the Department of the Interior to the Department of the Army. (NOTE: The files are provided in Adobe's portable document format (.pdf). To read or print these documents, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader set up as a plug-in to your browser.
16) Naples Reserve Golf Club, Florida
15) Robinson Island, Alabama
14) Pennsylvania Department of Transportation U.S. 220/I-99, Pennsylvania
13) British Petroleum Exploration (Northstar), Alaska
12) F.D. & P. Enterprises, Inc., (Hackensack Meadowlands) New Jersey
11) Maryland State Programmatic General Permit (MDSPGP)
10) City of Lake Jackson, Texas
9) North Fork Hughes River (Little Kanawha Soil Conservation District), West Virginia
8) Hartz Mountain Development Corporation, (Hacksensack Meadowlands), New Jersey
7) Meadville Mall (George B. Zamias), Pennsylvania
6) Riddle Farm Associates, L.P., Maryland
5) Natomas Area Flood Control Improvement Project (Sacramento Area Flood
Control Agency), California
4) Petro Star Valdez Refinery, Inc. (City of Valdez), Alaska
3) Greensprings Plantation, Virginia
2) General Permit 19, Vicksburg District, Mississippi
1) Churchill Downs (Elliott Homes), California
|
