Skip Navigation
small header image
The Condition of Education Indicator List Site Map Back to Home
Section Image Contexts of Postsecondary Education
: Learning Opportunities
<<Previous Next>>
1.

Participation in Education

2.

Learner Outcomes

3.

Student Effort and Educational Progress

4.

Contexts of Elementary and Secondary Education

5.

Contexts of Postsecondary Education

Introduction

Characteristics of Postsecondary Students

Programs and Courses

Learning Opportunities

- Remedial Coursetaking

Instructional Faculty and Staff Who Teach Undergraduates

Distance Education by Postsecondary Faculty

Distance Education at Postsecondary Institutions

Special Programs

Faculty and Staff

College Resources

State Policy

Finance



Bibliography

Remedial Coursetaking

Postsecondary institutions provided remedial coursework for 28 percent of entering freshmen in fall 2000; public 2-year colleges provided such coursework for 42 percent of their entering students.

Remedial education provides opportunities for students who lack the academic skills to succeed in postsecondary education. Recent studies have addressed which types of institutions provide remedial courses, how much remediation institutions allow students to take, and whether they offer credit for remedial coursework (NCES 2004–010).1 According to these institutions, 28 percent of entering freshmen enrolled in any remedial coursework (reading, writing, or mathematics) in fall 2000. Twenty-two percent undertook remediation in mathematics, 14 percent in writing, and 11 percent in reading. Freshmen at public 2-year colleges were the most likely group to enroll in a remedial course (42 vs. 12 to 24 percent of freshmen at other types of institutions). At the 4-year level, freshmen at public institutions were more likely than those at private institutions to do so.

In addition to enrolling at higher rates, freshmen at public 2-year colleges spent more time, on average, in remediation than freshmen at 4-year institutions in fall 2000 (see table 31-2). Among institutions that offered remedial courses, 63 percent of public 2-year institutions reported that their students averaged a year or more of remedial coursetaking, compared with 38 percent of public 4-year institutions (and 17 percent of private 4-year institutions).

Among institutions that offered remedial courses, about three-quarters gave institutional credit (which does not count toward a degree) for remedial courses in fall 2000 (78 percent in reading, 73 percent in writing, and 77 percent in mathematics) (see table 31-3).2 In addition, 12 to 18 percent gave degree credit (depending on subject), while about 10 percent gave no credit. In each subject area, private 4-year institutions were less likely than other types of institutions to award institutional credit for remedial courses.

Twenty-eight percent of entering freshmen enrolled in remedial courses in both 1995 and 2000, but the average length of time spent in remediation increased during this period (see tables 31-1 and 31-2). The proportion of institutions reporting that students averaged a year or more in remediation increased from 33 to 40 percent between 1995 and 2000.


1Remedial education includes “courses in reading, writing, or mathematics for college students lacking those skills necessary to perform college-level work at the level required by the [sampled] institution.” (back to text)

2In fall 1995 and 2000, institutions reported the most frequent type of credit they gave for remedial reading, writing, and mathematics courses from among the following options: degree credit that counts toward subject requirements; degree credit that counts toward elective requirements; institutional credit (e.g., counts toward financial aid, campus housing, or full-time student status, but does not count toward degree completion); or no credit. (back to text)


PDF  

Download/view file containing indicator and corresponding tables. (196 KB)

white bar
Charts  

PARTICIPATION IN REMEDIAL EDUCATION: Percentage of entering freshmen at degree-granting institutions who enrolled in remedial courses, by type of institution and subject area: Fall 2000

white bar
Tables  

Table 31-1: Number of entering freshmen at degree-granting institutions, and percentage of entering freshmen enrolled in remedial courses, by subject area and type of institution: Fall 1995 and 2000

Table 31-2: Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses, percentage distribution by the approximate length of time a student was enrolled in remedial courses at the institution, by type of institution: Fall 1995 and 2000

Table 31-3: Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in the given subjects, percentage distribution by the most frequent type of credit earned for remedial courses, by subject area and type of institution: Fall 1995 and 2000

white bar
Standard Error Tables  

Table S31: Standard errors for the percentage of entering freshmen at degree-granting institutions who enrolled in remedial courses, by type of institution and subject area: Fall 2000

Table S31-1: Standard errors for the number of entering freshmen at degree-granting institutions, and percentage of entering freshmen enrolled in remedial courses, by subject area and type of institution: Fall 1995 and 2000

Table S31-2: Standard errors for the percentage distribution by the approximate length of time a student was enrolled in remedial courses at the institution, among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses, by type of institution: Fall 1995 and 2000

Table S31-3: Standard errors for the percentage distribution by the most frequent type of credit earned for remedial courses, among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in the given subjects, by subject area and type of institution: Fall 1995 and 2000

white bar
Supplemental Notes  

Note 3: Other Surveys

Note 8: Classification of Postsecondary Education Institutions

black bar


1990 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006, USA
Phone: (202) 502-7300 (map)