Skip main navigation.
 U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans - Link to ED.gov Home Page
HEA: TRIO Student Support Services - FY 2007


CFDA Number: 84.042A - TRIO Student Support Services

Program Goal: Increase the percentage of low-income, first-generation college students who successfully pursue postsecondary education opportunities.

Objective 1 of 1: Increase postsecondary persistence and completion rates of low-income, first-generation individuals in the academic pipeline.
Indicator 1.1 of 4: Postsecondary persistence: Percentage of Student Support Services participants persisting at the same institution will increase.
 
Measure 1.1.1 of 1: The percentage of TRIO Student Support Services participants persisting at the same institution.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1999 67  
2000 67 67
2001 70 67
2002 72 67
2003 72 68
2004 73.10 68.50
2005   69
2006   72
2007   73
2008   73
2009   73.50
2010   73.50
2011   74

Source: Evaluation, Higher Education.
Section: The National Evaluation of Upward Bound: Summary of First-year Impacts and Program Operations (1997) .

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: November 2006
The annual performance report is based on self-reported data; a variety of data quality checks are used to assess the completeness and reasonableness of the data submitted.
 
Explanation: Persistence is defined as the rate of freshman participants who continue to enroll at the grantee institution in the following academic year. Data from the national study of the Student Support Services Program provided the baseline data (1999 actual performance). Subsequent data are from the Annual Performance Reports. Targets were recalculated in FY 2006, as the persistence rate has increased since the baseline year. Previously reported FY 2004 data has been recalculated to be more accurate.
 
Indicator 1.2 of 4: Postsecondary completion two- year schools: Percentage of Student Support Services freshmen completing an Associates degree at original institution or transferring to a four- year institution within three years will increase.
 
Measure 1.2.1 of 1: Percentage of Student Support Services participants completing an Associates degree at original institution or transferring to a four-year institution within three years.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2001
23.10
 
2002
26
 
2003
27.70
 
2004
25.60
 
2006
 
27
2007
 
27.50
2008
 
27.50
2009
 
28
2010
 
28
2011
 
28.50

Source: Grantee Performance Report, Annual Performance Report for the Student Support Services (SSS) Program.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: November 2006
The annual performance report is based on self-reported data; a variety of data quality checks are used to assess the completeness and reasonableness of the data submitted.
 
Explanation: Previously reported FY 2004 has been recalculated to be more accurate.
 
Indicator 1.3 of 4: Postsecondary completion-four-year schools: Percentage of Student Support Services freshmen completing an Bachelors degree at original institution within six years will increase.
 
Measure 1.3.1 of 1: Percentage of Student Support Services freshmen completing an Bachelors degree at original institution within six-years.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2004
28.10
 
2006
 
28
2007
 
29
2008
 
29
2009
 
29.50
2010
 
29.50
2011
 
30

Source: Grantee Performance Report, Annual Performance Report for the Student Support Services (SSS) Program.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: November 2006
The annual performance report is comprised of self-reported data. However, a variety of data quality checks are used to assess the completeness and reasonableness of the data submitted.
 
Explanation: 2003-04 is the first year for which graduation data for four-year schools were available from the annual performance reports. Previously reported FY 2004 data has been recalculated to be more accurate.
 
Indicator 1.4 of 4: Efficiency Measure: Cost per successful outcome.
 
Measure 1.4.1 of 1: Cost of program completers, transfers to another institution or persisters in the same school and gap between cost per successful outcome and cost per program participant.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Cost per successful outcome Gap between cost per outcome and cost per output
Gap between cost per outcome and cost per output
2003
1,528 263
   
2004
1,510 252
   
2007
   
  239

Source: Grantee Performance Report, Annual Performance Report for the Student Support Services (SSS) Program.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: November 2006

Improvements: Actual allocations of the annual appropriation are now used instead of the overall appropriation.
 
Explanation: The efficiency measure is derived by dividing the annual appropriation by the number of students completing, transferring or persisting at the same institution during that specific school year. The 2007 target was established to reduce the gap by $13 or 5 percent (viewed another way, there was a 20 percent difference between the 2004 cost per outcome and cost per output, which the 2007 target would reduce to 19 percent). As more trend data become available, additional data analysis are completed, and feedback is received from the TRIO community, the Department will work to ensure that efficiency measure data are informative and useful, and to ensure that efficiency measure targets are sufficiently ambitious yet reasonable.
 


Return to table of contents

Last Modified: 02/23/2006