SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16104 \ April 2, 1999 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MICHAEL D. RICHMOND, individually, MICHAEL D. RICHMOND d/b/a LIBERTY NETWORK, ROYAL MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL BANK, MERIDIAN MONETARY SERVICES, INC., WILLIAM DUKE, MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC., K. BRUCE NUCKOLS, ANTHONY GARRY, THOMAS CONNOLLY, AND AS RELIEF DEFENDANTS, ZONE PRODUCTIONS, INC., TERRY KOONTZ AND MARIANNE CLARK AND LINDA MITCHELL as Trustees for PURR TRUST (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, C.A. No. 98CV11378-NG) The Commission announced today that the Honorable Nancy Gertner, United States District Judge for the District of Massachusetts, issued a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction against Anthony Garry ("Garry"), of Beverly, Massachusetts, who consented to the relief without admitting or denying the Commission’s allegations. The judgment enjoins Garry from future violations of the securities registration, antifraud and broker- dealer registration provisions of the federal securities laws. The Commission’s Complaint alleged that Garry, using false information and promotional brochures provided by Defendant Michael D. Richmond, sold at least $500,000 worth of fictitious unregistered International Certificates of Deposit ("ICDs") issued by Defendant Royal Meridian International Bank ("RMIB"), a non-existent bank. The Commission alleged that Garry, a former registered-representative, falsely informed investors, many of whom were teachers in Massachusetts public schools, that the RMIB ICDs would provide a guaranteed rate of return of 12%, 18%, or in some cases 24%, that RMIB held 125% in cash reserves for each investment; that all investments were secured by Government National Mortgage Association bonds and that certain large investors would receive a security interest in their investment evidenced by a UCC-1 issued by the "The Federal Bank." The Complaint further alleged that Garry convinced one investor to liquidate over $275,000 in variable annuities to purchase the phony ICDs. The Court ordered Garry to disgorge $58,875, representing commissions earned from the conduct alleged. The disgorgement was waived based on Garry’s demonstrated inability to pay. In addition, no civil monetary penalties were assessed based on Garry’s financial condition. The statutory sections Garry is enjoined from violating are Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The litigation is continuing as to the remaining defendants. For further information, see Litigation Release Nos. 15813 and 16027. .