UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16031 / January 19, 1999 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Uniglobe Trading Company, Inc., et. al., 97 Civ. 08659 (USDC SDNY) The Commission announced that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, White Plains Division issued orders of permanent injunction and other relief against ten defendants in a pending action involving the offer to sell forged and fictitious treasury bonds purportedly issued by an Argentinean bank and the government of Japan. Judge Charles Brieant issued orders on January 5, 1999 against Uniglobe Trading Company Inc. (Uniglobe), a Yonkers, New York entity which claimed to assist clients in the transfer of financial instruments and commodities; two of its officers, Clint Holland (Holland) and Margaret Laughrin (Laughrin); Moorgreen Holdings Limited (Moorgreen), a Gibralter company with offices in Spain; a Moorgreen representative, Raymond Nakachian (Nakachian), Northeast Investment Institution, Inc. (Northeast), a Fayetteville, North Carolina entity, and four representatives of Northeast including Thomas Patrick McGlon (president and a director), Daniel Watlington (secretary-treasurer and a director), William Muwwakkil (vice-president and a director) and Tyrone P. Jones, III (a "special consultant"). The Commission's complaint, filed November 21, 1997, alleged that, during 1997, Uniglobe, Holland, Laughrin Nakachian and Moorgreen participated in offers to sell fraudulent certificates of deposit (CDs) purportedly issued by of Banco de la Nacion Argentina with stated principal amounts exceeding [U.S.] $100 million each. The complaint further alleged that Uniglobe, Holland, Laughrin, Northeast and its representatives during the same period offered for sale forged treasury bonds purportedly issued by the Japanese government totaling 12 billion yen (approximately [U.S.] $120 million). In November and December 1997, the Commission sought, and the Court entered, temporary restraining orders halting the attempts to sell the fictitious instruments, and no sales of either type of fictitious instrument were consummated. Without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint, the ten defendants named in the action consented to the issuance of an order permanently enjoining them from violating the antifraud provisions, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Based upon their demonstrated financial inability to pay, the Commission waived imposition of civil penalties as to the defendants. [See Litigation Releases Nos. 15568 (November 2, 1997); 15592 (December 12,1997) and 15621 (January 20, 1998)].