SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16027 / January 19, 1999 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MICHAEL D. RICHMOND, individually, MICHAEL D. RICHMOND d/b/a LIBERTY NETWORK, ROYAL MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL BANK, MERIDIAN MONETARY SERVICES, INC., WILLIAM DUKE, MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC., K. BRUCE NUCKOLS, ANTHONY GARRY, THOMAS CONNOLLY, AND AS RELIEF DEFENDANTS, ZONE PRODUCTIONS, INC., TERRY KOONTZ AND MARIANNE CLARK AND LINDA MITCHELL as Trustees for PURR TRUST (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, C.A. No. 98CV11378-NG) The Commission announced today that, on December 22, 1998, the Honorable Nancy Gertner, United States District Judge for the District of Massachusetts, issued Final Judgments of Permanent Injunction against Thomas P. Connolly ("Connolly") and K. Bruce Nuckols ("Nuckols"). Connolly and Nuckols, who consented to the relief without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, were enjoined from future violations of the securities registration, antifraud and broker-dealer registration provisions of the federal securities laws. The Commission's Complaint alleged that, using false information and promotional brochures provided by Defendant Michael D. Richmond, Connolly and Nuckols sold fictitious unregistered International Certificates of Deposit ("ICDs") issued by Defendant Royal Meridian International Bank ("RMIB"), a non-existent bank. The Commission alleged that Connolly and Nuckols falsely informed investors that the RMIB ICDs would provide a guaranteed rate of return of 12%, 18%, or in some cases 24%, that RMIB held 125% in cash reserves for each investment, that all investments were secured by Government National Mortgage Association bonds, and that certain large investors would receive a security interest in their investment evidenced by a UCC-1 issued by the "The Federal Bank." In addition, Connolly, a former registered representative with WMA Securities, Inc. ("WMA") is alleged to have sold the ICDs after WMA issued a compliance warning prohibiting the solicitation or sale of RMIB products. The Court ordered Connolly and Nuckols to disgorge $6,970 and $25,385, respectively, representing commissions earned from the conduct alleged. The disgorgement was waived based on the defendants' demonstrated inability to pay. In addition, no civil monetary penalties were assessed against Connolly and Nuckols based on their financial condition. Connolly and Nuckols are enjoined from violating Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On January 14, 1998, based on the entry of the injunction, the Commission entered an Order barring Connolly from association with any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, investment adviser or investment company. Connolly consented to the Commission's Order. The litigation is continuing as to the remaining defendants. For further information, see Litigation Release No. 15813.