==========================================START OF PAGE 1====== SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. Litigation Release No. 15179 / December 9, 1996 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. THOMAS S. MACKIE, JR., PETER M. STANLEY AND ANDREW S. FINK,, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Civil Action No. 95- 4852 (JS). The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on November 27, 1996, the Honorable Joanna Seybert, United States District Judge, entered a Default Judgment against defendant Thomas S. Mackie, Jr. The Judgment (i) permanently restrains and enjoins Mackie from violating the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as well as provisions prohibiting the sale of unregistered securities; and (ii) orders Mackie to pay a civil penalty of $100,000 as a result of his violations of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Judgment was entered against Mackie due to his failure to contest the Commission's Complaint which alleged the following: In the period from late 1991 through late 1992, Mackie fraudulently obtained securities from three different entities: (1) the Bank of Keetoowah, a bank located in Oklahoma, (2) Sigma Alpha Entertainment Group, Ltd., a Philadelphia-based record company and (3) Command Credit Corporation, a financial services company located in Rockville Center, New York. In each case, Mackie acquired the securities by falsely stating that he represented a Liechtenstein trust named Stirling Trust and by misrepresenting the size of the trust's assets and, accordingly, his ability to pay for the securities. In addition to numerous false statements and omissions, Mackie's fraudulent activity included the creation and use of false and misleading financial statements for Stirling Trust and the use of a forged certificate of deposit and falsified account statements. (See Litigation Release No. 14732). Mackie is currently serving a sentence of more than 11 years in federal prison. That sentence was imposed earlier this year in a case prosecuted by the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Louisiana and was based, in part, on Mackie's fraud on Command Credit Corporation. Defendant Andrew S. Fink settled the Commission's case against him at the time the Complaint was filed. The Commission is actively pursuing its case against defendant Peter M. Stanley. The Complaint alleges that Stanley participated in Mackie's fraud on Command Credit by, among other things, misrepresenting Mackie's relationship with Stirling Trust and the size of the trust's assets.