==========================================START OF PAGE 1====== SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15103 / October 2, 1996 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JOHN W. WALSH, JR., INTERCAP MONITORING CORPORATION, SECURITY DATA GROUP, INC., INTERCAP MONITORING INCOME FUND IV-A, LTD., INTERCAP MONITORING INCOME FUND IV-B, LTD., INTERCAP MONITORING INCOME FUND IV-C, LTD., INTERCAP MONITORING INCOME FUND IV-D, LTD., INTERCAP MONITORING INCOME FUND V, LTD., and INTERCAP MONITORING INCOME FUND V-B, LTD., U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, Civil Action No. 4-96-CV-0733 (formerly 3-94-CV-1573) The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it has settled a civil action which the Commission had filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota against defendants John W. Walsh, Jr. ("Walsh"), InterCap Monitoring Corporation ("InterCap"), Security Data Group, Inc. ("SDG"), InterCap Monitoring Income Funds IV-A, B, C, and D, Ltd., and InterCap Monitoring Income Funds V and V-B, Ltd. The defendants were in the business of buying, and holding for investment purposes, residential and business security alarm monitoring contracts. In its Complaint, the Commission alleged that, from approximately January 1989 through the spring of 1992, the defendants violated the federal securities laws by making fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions to investors in connection with the offer or sale of partnership interests and by offering unregistered securities. Defendants Walsh, InterCap, and SDG, without admitted or denying the allegations in the Commission's Complaint, consented to the entry of judgments which included final orders of permanent injunction against the defendants for their respective violations of Sections 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Additionally, Walsh agreed to assessment of civil penalties in the amount of $250,000 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act. Based upon Walsh's financial condition, the Court did not direct payment of the penalties. This action has now been concluded as to all parties.