==========================================START OF PAGE 1====== UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15065 / September 24, 1996 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. NILDA ZIM, ET AL., 95 Civ. 9143 (RO) (S.D.N.Y.) The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that on September 11, 1996, Judge Richard Owen of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a Final Judgment by Default against Nilda Zim ("Zim"). Pursuant to the Final Judgment, Zim is permanently enjoined from further violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 7(f) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 10b-5 thereunder and Regulation X promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Final Judgment also orders Zim to disgorge $1,256,614.21, including prejudgment interest, and to pay a $785,636 civil penalty pursuant to the Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990. In addition, Zim is permanently enjoined from offering for sale any security, opening or trading in any brokerage accounts or engaging in the purchase or sale of any security. This restraint is absolute, and is effective regardless of whether such solicitation, purchases or sales are made in furtherance of a scheme or artifice to defraud. The Commission's Complaint alleged that beginning in approximately December 1989, Zim and the other individual defendants launched a free-riding scheme. When Zim opened cash accounts at brokerage firms, she misrepresented her identity and net worth to give the brokers the false impression that she had substantial assets. During the course of the scheme Zim and the other individual defendants opened over 645 brokerage accounts, at more than 62 brokerage firms using approximately 40 different assumed names. When Zim ordered trades, she misrepresented her intent and ability legitimately to pay for the securities purchases with her own funds. Instead, to settle her transactions, Zim instructed her clearing agents to rely upon the proceeds from offsetting same-day sales to pay for the purchases. Zim and the other individual defendants traded in this fashion over a period of at least 4 years; and as a result over $260 million worth of securities in cash accounts with little or no capital were purchased and sold and the risk of loss was shifted onto unwitting brokerage firms. As a result of the scheme Zim realized $785,637.12 in profits, a portion of which she is jointly and severally liable for with two other individual defendants.