SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Litigation Release No. 14849 / March 20, 1996 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LIFE PARTNERS, INC. and BRIAN D. PARDO, Civil Action No. 94-1861 (D.D.C.) On March 19, 1996, Judge Royce C. Lamberth granted an emergency motion made by the SEC to prohibit the defendants from proceeding with plans to resume sales of fractional interests in viatical settlements under purportedly revised procedures. The order comes just eight weeks after the Court specifically enjoined the defendants from selling such unregistered investment contracts. See SEC v. Life Partners, Inc., 912 F. Supp. 4 (D.D.C. 1996). That order, in turn, followed a decision issued by the Court last August in which it held that the SEC had made a strong prima facie showing that the defendants were making materially false and misleading representations and omissions in connection with the offer and sale of unregistered securities, and directed the defendants to bring their operations into compliance with the federal securities laws "forthwith." See SEC v. Life Partners, Inc., 898 F. Supp. 14 (D.D.C. 1995). In the order issued yesterday, the Court rejected the defendants' claim that their changed procedures had taken their offerings outside the scope of the securities laws. The Court described the changes as "artificial and technical" and held that the "so-called 'new' procedures are virtually identical to the old ones from the perspective of the investor." "[I]t is neither realistic nor feasible," the Court said, "for multiple investors, who are strangers to each other, to perform post-purchase tasks without relying on the knowledge and expertise of a third party." The Court further noted that the third party would "almost certainly be Sterling Trust," which has previously provided such services in connection with the defendants' offerings and whose president, Mike Posey, has just been installed as president of Life Partners. The defendants' appeals from the Court's orders of August 30, 1995, and January 22, 1996, granting the SEC preliminary injunctive relief are pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; oral argument is scheduled for April 4, 1996. As to the commencement of the action and the Court's prior orders, see Lit. Release No. 14209 (Aug. 25, 1994); Lit. Release No. 14623 (Aug. 31, 1995); and Lit. Release No. 14668 (Oct. 2, 1995).