Fish and Wildlife Journal

(Return matching records with ALLANY of these words.)
  
................................................................
state   
regions   
................................................................
Clickable FWS Regional Map of US
................................................................
HOME
Journal Entry   Back
Federal Report Details Economic Impact of Watching Wildlife in Iowa
Midwest Region, October 9, 2003
Print Friendly Version
A new economic report released by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shows that more than 1 million people spent more than $188 million observing, feeding and photographing wildlife in Iowa during 2001. The expenditures ? by both resident and nonresidents watching wildlife in Iowa -- generated 5,140 jobs with wages and salaries of nearly $92 million. The jobs also generated $10.4 million in state sales and income taxes.

The report, "2001 National and State Economic Impacts of Wildlife Watching Addendum," examines national participation in wildlife watching, associated expenditures, economic activity generated by these expenditures, employment and income associated with expenditures, and associated state and federal tax revenue. The data is collected during the Service's National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife Associated Recreation, conducted by the Service every five years.

Nationally, the survey shows roughly 66 million Americans spent more than $38 billion observing, feeding or photographic wildlife in 2001, the expenditures resulted in more than 1 million jobs that paid $27.8 billion in salaries and wages.

"Many Americans enjoy watching wildlife, however we often overlook the positive impact these activities have on state and local economies," said Service Director Steve Williams.

Direct expenditures by wildlife watchers included expenditures for items such as cameras, binoculars and bird food, and for trip-related expenses such as lodging, transportation and food. For each $1 of direct spending associated with wildlife watching in the United States, an additional $1.49 of economic activity was generated.

Only participants whose principal motivation for the trip, activity or expenditure is wildlife-related were counted. Residential participants include those whose activities are within one mile of home and nonresidential participants refers to people who take trips or outings of at least one mile. The survey did not include trips to zoos, circuses, aquariums, museums, or for scouting game.

The full report is available on-line at http://federalaid.fws.gov.

Contact Info: Midwest Region Public Affairs, 612-713-5313, charles_traxler@fws.gov



Send to:
From:

Notes:
..........................................................................................
USFWS
Privacy Disclaimer Feedback/Inquiries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bobby WorldWide Approved