******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Review of the Commission's ) MM Docket No. 98-204 Broadcast and Cable ) Equal Employment Opportunity ) Rules and Policies ) and ) Termination of the ) MM Docket No. 96-16 EEO Streamlining Proceeding ) ) ) ) ORDER Adopted: January 5, 1999 Released: January 5, 1999 Comment Date: February 18, 1999 Reply Comment Date: March 23, 1999 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: 1. On November 20, 1998, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-204 (NPRM), requesting comment on various proposals concerning the Commission's broadcast and cable EEO rules and policies. Comment and Reply Comment deadlines were established for January 19, 1999, and February 18, 1999, respectively. 2. On December 17, 1998, the National Association of Broadcasters ("NAB") filed a "Motion for Extension of Time of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines" ("Motion"). Therein, the NAB requested that we extend the due dates for the submission of comments and reply comments in response to the NPRM to February 18, 1999, and March 23, 1999, respectively. In support of its request, the NAB asserts that the NPRM raises many important issues and proposals "that need to be fully reviewed and discussed by the NAB Board of Directors," and that grant of the extension would allow time for the NAB Board to conduct such a review and discussion at their January Board Meeting (which occurs January 9-13, 1999) and, thereafter, "for NAB staff to prepare comments consistent with the decisions made by the Board." 3. On January 4, 1999, the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council ("MMTC") sent a letter to the Commission expressing support for the NAB's Motion. The MMTC stated that "[o]wing to the extensive amount of detail requested of commenters [in the NPRM], it would be virtually impossible [for MMTC] to file comprehensive comments by the initial due date." 4. We believe the public interest would be served by an extension of the comment period in this proceeding because it would enable commenters to file comprehensive comments on the important issues raised in the NPRM. Accordingly, we will extend the date for filing comments to February 18, 1999, and extend the date for filing reply comments to March 23, 1999. We do not contemplate further extensions of the comment cycle of this proceeding. 5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the National Association of Broadcasters IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the dates for filing comments and reply comments in this proceeding ARE EXTENDED to February 18, 1999, and March 23, 1999, respectively. 7. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i) and 303(r), and Sections 0.204(b), 0.283 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 0.204(b), 0.283 and 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roy J. Stewart Chief, Mass Media Bureau