Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Effect of Dutasteride on Bladder Wall Hypertrophy in Patients With Benign Prostatic Obstruction
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00827814   Information provided by Samsung Medical Center
First Received: January 22, 2009   Last Updated: May 5, 2009   History of Changes
This Tabular View shows the required WHO registration data elements as marked by

January 22, 2009
May 5, 2009
June 2006
Percent (numeric) changes in ultrasound-estimated bladder weight (UEBW) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months of dutasteride treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00827814 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Urodynamic parameters [ Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and/or 6 months of dutasteride treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Micturition diary efficacy parameters [ Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and/or 6 months of dutasteride treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Prostate volume parameters [ Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and/or 6 months of dutasteride treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Quality of life parameters [ Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and/or 6 months of dutasteride treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • LUTS Symptom parameters [ Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and/or 6 months of dutasteride treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • LUTS outcome score [ Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and/or 6 months of dutasteride treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Patient perceptions [ Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and/or 6 months of dutasteride treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Safety parameters [ Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and/or 6 months of dutasteride treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
 
Effect of Dutasteride on Bladder Wall Hypertrophy in Patients With Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Effect of Dutasteride on Bladder Wall Hypertrophy in Patients With Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A 24-Week Open-Label, Single-Arm Pilot Study

Treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate hyperplasia aims at improving patient quality of life by reducing symptom-related bother. Treatment of bladder outlet obstruction aims at relieving benign prostate hyperplasia complications, such as chronic renal failure, hydronephrosis, bladder diverticula, and acute and chronic retention of urine, but also aims at relieving lower urinary tract symptoms associated with detrusor dysfunction.

Increased bladder mass occurs as a consequence of bladder outlet obstruction in animals and patients, and relief of bladder outlet obstruction reverses an increased bladder mass. Whether increased bladder mass is not only a consequence of bladder outlet obstruction but also a relevant risk factor for the progression of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostate hyperplasia cannot be decided due to a lack of appropriate data, most likely because bladder wall thickness is not routinely measured in clinical studies and/or routine clinical practice. Despite this lack of data, many urologists feel that increased bladder mass should be prevented or decreased to reduce the occurrence of serious complications.

The possibility of using bladder wall thickness data as criteria for benign prostate hyperplasia intervention and as outcome criteria for benign prostate hyperplasia treatment has been proposed. Detrusor hypertrophy associated with bladder outlet obstruction can be imaged on suprapubic ultrasound, and bladder mass can be quantified from the evaluation of bladder wall thickness and bladder volume. Bladder wall hypertrophy has been found to be correlated with detrusor function.

Independent studies have shown that surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction results in a significant decrease of bladder mass. Preliminary data suggest the possibility that medical treatment with alpha-adrenergic antagonists might also produce a reduction of bladder wall hypertrophy.

The investigators assume that the prevention of benign prostate hyperplasia progression by alpha-adrenergic antagonists and 5 alpha reductase inhibitors may be result of bladder function protection. To our knowledge there have been no studies that evaluated the effects of a 5 alpha reductase inhibitors on bladder function. Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a prospective trial evaluating the effects of 5 alpha reductase inhibitors on bladder function by the evaluation of bladder wall thickness and lower urinary tract symptoms.

1 Objective

1.1 Primary Objective: To explore the efficacy of Dutasteride in reducing bladder wall hypertrophy from baseline to 6 months of treatment in male patients with benign prostatic obstruction.

1.2 Secondary Objective:

  1. To explore the efficacy of Dutasteride in reducing the LUTS symptoms, number of micturitions, and number of urgency episodes from baseline to 6 months of treatment
  2. To explore the efficacy of Dutasteride on the urodynamic parameters from baseline to 6 months of treatment.
  3. To explore the efficacy of Dutasteride on the tolerability, safety, patient perception and quality of life from baseline to 6 months of treatment.

2 Endpoints

2.1 Primary Endpoint: Percent (numeric) changes in ultrasound-estimated bladder weight (UEBW) from baseline to 6 months of treatment

2.2 Secondary Endpoint:

Urodynamic parameters: From baseline to 6 months of treatment

  • Percentage and numeric changes of the

    • Maximum flow rate (mL/s)
    • Average flow rate (mL/s)
    • Post-void residual urine volume (mL)

Micturition diary efficacy parameters: From baseline to 6 months of treatment

  • Percentage and numeric changes in micturition frequency/24 hours
  • Percentage and numeric changes in mean volume voided per micturition
  • Percentage and numeric changes in mean number and severity of urgency per micturition

Prostate volume parameters:

  • Change in prostate volume by TRUS from baseline to after 6 months of treatment.
  • Change in serum PSA from baseline to after 6 months of treatment.

Quality of life parameters:

  • Change in Bother Score of IPSS score from baseline to 6 months of treatment

LUTS Symptom parameters:

  • Change in IPSS score from baseline to 6 months of treatment

    • total score: sum of all 7 questions
    • storage score: sum of questions 2, 4 and 7
    • voiding score: sum of questions 1, 3, 5 and 6

LUTS outcome score (LOS)

  • Change in LOS from baseline to 6 months of treatment

Patient perceptions:

  • Patient perception of treatment benefit after 3 and 6 months of treatment
  • Change in patient perception of urgency from baseline to 3 and 6 month of treatment

Safety parameters:

  • Incidence and severity of adverse events
  • Incidence and reason of withdrawals

    3. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Study Design: This is a 6-month prospective Phase IV study to explore the effect on the bladder function of Dutasteride in male patients with benign prostatic obstruction.

Phase IV
Interventional
Treatment, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Drug: Dutasteride
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
36
April 2009
April 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age≥50 and <80 years old
  2. Presence of LUTS for at least 3 months
  3. IPSS≥15
  4. Bladder outlet obstruction confirmed by pressure-flow study (BOOI > 20)
  5. Prostate volume measured by TRUS ≥ 30ml and < 100ml
  6. Able to comply with the prescribed treatment protocol and evaluations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with neurogenic voiding disorders
  2. Patients with prostate or bladder cancer
  3. Patients underwent urethral, prostate or bladder neck surgery
  4. Patients with urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture
  5. Serum PSA≥4ng/ml (if the patient confirmed as no malignancy by prostate biopsy can be included).
  6. Patients who medicated with 5ARI within 6 months
  7. Patients who do not agree with the informed consent
Male
50 Years to 79 Years
No
 
Korea, Republic of
 
 
NCT00827814
Kyu-Sung Lee/Professor, Samsung Medical Center
 
Samsung Medical Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Principal Investigator: Kyu-Sung Lee, Ph.D Samsung Medical Center
Samsung Medical Center
May 2009

 †    Required WHO trial registration data element.
††   WHO trial registration data element that is required only if it exists.