ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
40 CFR Ch. I
FRL-7085-7
October 2001 Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
[December 3, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 232)]
[Unified Agenda]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID: f:ua011222.wais]
[Page 62239-62392]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part XXII
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
[[Page 62240]]
_______________________________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
40 CFR Ch. I
FRL-7085-7
October 2001 Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
_______________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the
Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions to update the
public about:
- Regulations and major policies currently under development,
- Reviews of existing regulations and major policies, and
- Regulations and major policies completed or canceled since the
last Agenda.
TO BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA MAILING LIST: If you would like to
subscribe, please contact Janice Ndunguru (1806A), Environmental
Protection Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460;
by e-mail at ndunguru.janice@epa.gov; or by phone at (202) 564-6572.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions or comments
about a particular action please get in touch with the agency contact
listed for that action. If you have general questions about the Agenda
or about EPA's decisionmaking process, please contact: Philip Schwartz
(1806A), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW;
Washington, DC 20460; phone: (202) 564-6564; e-mail:
schwartz.philip@epa.gov. We welcome your suggestions on how we can make
the Agenda more useful to you and easier to use.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
a. What Principles and Objectives Guide EPA in Developing Regulations
and Policies?
b. How Does EPA Develop Rules and Policies?
c. What Actions Are Included in the Agenda?
d. How Is the Agenda Organized?
e. What Information Is in Agenda Entries?
f. What Additional Information Is in Regulatory Plan Entries?
g. What Tools Are Available To Help Quickly Identify Actions That Are
of Interest to You?
h. How Can You Access Federal Register Documents and Interpretive
Guidance via the Internet and via E-mail?
i. What Special Attention Do We Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small
Entities?
j. Why Participate and How To Do It Most Effectively?
A. What Principles and Objectives Guide EPA in Developing Regulations
and Policies?
The quality of the science, economic, and policy analysis that
underlie EPA regulations is vital to the credibility of EPA
decisions and ultimately our effectiveness in protecting human
health and the environment. Additionally, continued testing and
adoption of new environmental protection methods must be a central
tenet in environmental problem solving. A well managed regulatory
process and a strong commitment to innovative solutions will ensure
that the significant environmental improvements that we all want to
achieve are cost-effective, fair and fully protective.
Much of the success over the last 31 years and seven
administrations in cleaning up the Nation's water, air, and land is
attributable to the system of Federal and State regulation that has
directed and coordinated private investment in pollution control
and prevention. While regulation will remain an important tool to
implement environmental policy, it is not the only one. Instead,
EPA must increasingly act as an innovator, educator, and leader in
administering a broad set of new tools -- including new methods to
design and administer regulations -- that engage all segments of
our society in responsive behaviors that protect the environment
while promoting appropriate economic growth. For example, we have
worked with businesses and community leaders to develop more than
40 voluntary partnership programs that help achieve environmental
objectives with the greatest possible efficiency. For more
information about these programs visit: www.epa.gov/partners.
EPA's regulatory process must ensure that the Nation's
environmental protection system produces the best outcomes at an
acceptable cost, where cost considerations are appropriate.
Appropriate scientific, economic and policy analyses must be
planned at early stages in the regulatory development process so
that senior Agency decision makers understand the benefits and
costs of policy options from which to choose. Additionally, it is
important that we continue to apply new methods to protect the
environment--by building flexibility into regulations up front,
through non-regulatory approaches where effective, by creating
strong partnerships with States, local governments, and businesses,
and by vigorously using public outreach and involvement.
Several basic legal requirements we must follow when we issue
a regulation are contained in the Administrative Procedure Act, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act, the Paperwork Reduction Act, the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act, and the Congressional Review Act. You can find
information on many of these laws at http://www.law.cornell.edu/
uscode/
.
We also must meet a number of requirements contained in
Executive Orders. Of particular significance for EPA rulemakings
are Executive Orders 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review), 13045
(Children's Health Protection), 13175
(Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments), 13132
(Federalism),
and 13211 (Energy). You can find information on these and other
Executive orders at http://www.nara.gov/fedreg/eo.html
.
B. How Does EPA Develop Rules and Policies?
In order to improve the regulatory process within EPA, we
established a task force to examine the Agency's rulemaking
process, and to recommend ways to improve the internal process and
strengthen the supporting science and analysis. The task force
concluded that the regulatory process is essentially sound but
improvements should be made in several areas to more effectively
carry out our mission including: better science and economic
analyses; broader consideration of policy options; greater
accountability; and better management of significant nonregulatory
decisions. For a detailed discussion of these improvements, please
see our Statement of Priorities in The Regulatory Plan,
[[Page 62241]]
contained in part II of today's Federal Register.
C. What Actions Are Included in the Agenda?
EPA includes regulations and certain major policy documents in
the Agenda. We generally do not include minor amendments or the
following categories of actions in the Agenda:
Under the Clean Air Act: Revisions to State Implementation
Plans; Equivalent Methods for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring; Deletions
from the New Source Performance Standards source categories list;
Delegations of Authority to States; Area Designations for Air Quality
Planning Purposes.
Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act: Actions regarding pesticide tolerances and food additive
regulations; decision documents defining and establishing registration
standards; decision documents and termination decisions for the Special
Review Registration process; and data call-in requests made under
section 3(c)(2)(B).
Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act:
Authorization of State solid waste management plans; hazardous waste
delisting petitions.
Under the Clean Water Act: State Water Quality Standards;
Deletions from the section 307(a) list of toxic pollutants; Suspensions
of toxic testing requirements under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES); Delegations of NPDES authority to States.
Under the Safe Drinking Water Act: Actions on State
underground injection control programs.
There is no legal significance to the omission of an item from
the agenda.
D. How Is the Agenda Organized?
We have organized the agenda:
First, by the law that would authorize a particular action;
Second, by the current stage of development (proposal, final,
etc.); and
Third, by the section number of the statute which requires or
authorizes the action.
The following 14 sections deal with 13 laws that EPA
administers and a fourteenth broader section called ``General''
that includes cross-cutting actions, such as rules authorized by
multiple statutes and general acquisition rules:
1. General
2. The Clean Air Act (CAA)
3. The Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
4. The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
5. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
6. The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
7. The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
8. Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory
Relief Act
9. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
10. The Oil Pollution Act (OPA)
11. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act; Superfund (CERCLA)
12. The Clean Water Act (CWA)
13. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
14. The Shore Protection Act (SPA)
In each of these 14 sections, there are up to 5 headings
covering the following stages of rulemaking:
1. Prerulemakings - Prerulemaking actions are intended to determine
whether EPA should initiate rulemaking. Prerulemakings may include
anything that influences or leads to rulemaking, such as advance
notices of proposed rulemaking (ANPRMs), significant studies or
analyses of the possible need for regulatory action, announcement of
reviews of existing regulations required under section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, requests for public comment on the need for
regulatory action, or important preregulatory policy proposals.
2. Proposed Rules - This section includes EPA rulemaking actions that
are within a year of proposal (publication of Notices of Proposed
Rulemakings (NPRMs)).
3. Final Rules - This section includes rules that are within a year of
final promulgation.
4. Long-Term Actions - This section includes rulemakings for which the
next scheduled regulatory action is after September 2002.
5. Completed Actions - This section contains actions that have been
promulgated and published in the Federal Register07 since
publication of the April 2001 Agenda.
It also includes actions that we
are no longer considering or actions
that have been merged into other
actions. If an action appears in
the completed section, it will not
appear in future Agendas unless we
decide to initiate action again, in
which case it will appear as a
new entry. EPA also announces the
results of our Regulatory Flexibility Act
section 610 reviews in this section
of the Agenda.
E. What Information Is in Agenda Entries?
Agenda entries include the following information, where
applicable:
Sequence Number: This indicates where the entry appears in the
Agenda.
Title: Titles for new entries (those that haven't appeared in
previous Agendas) are preceded by a bullet (bullet). The
notation ``Section 610 Review'' follows the title if we are
reviewing the rule as part of our periodic review of existing rules
under section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 610).
Priority: Entries are placed into one of five categories
described below.
Economically Significant: As defined in Executive Order 12866,
a rulemaking action that will have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or will adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
tribal governments or communities. OMB reviews all economically
significant rules under Executive Order 12866.
EPA is developing 25 rules that are expected to have
annualized economic impacts of more than $100 million.
[[Page 62242]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Rules that are expected to have annualized economic impacts over $100 million RIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Radon..................................... 2040-AA94
2 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Groundwater Rule.......................... 2040-AA97
3 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance 2040-AB75
and New Source Contaminant Monitoring.................................................
4 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Metal Products and Machinery Category, Phases 2040-AB79
1 and 2...............................................................................
5 NPDES Permit Requirements for Municipal Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems, Municipal 2040-AD02
Satellite Collection Systems, and Sanitary Sewer Overflows............................
6 NPDES Permit Regulation and Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for 2040-AD19
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs)........................................
7 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water 2040-AD37
Treatment Rule........................................................................
8 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfectants/Disinfection 2040-AD38
Byproducts Rule.......................................................................
9 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development Industry........ 2040-AD42
10 Minimizing Adverse Environmental Impact from Cooling Water Intake Structures at 2040-AD62
Existing Facilities Under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, Phase 2..............
11 Corrective Action for Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) at Hazardous Waste 2050-AB80
Management Facilities.................................................................
12 Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Wastes Generated by Commercial Electric 2050-AE81
Power Producers.......................................................................
13 Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Wastes -- Non-Power Producers and 2050-AE83
Minefilling...........................................................................
14 NESHAP: Plywood and Composite Wood Products............................................ 2060-AG52
15 NESHAP: Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine....................................... 2060-AG63
16 NESHAP: Combustion Turbine............................................................. 2060-AG67
17 NESHAP: Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters........... 2060-AG69
18 NESHAP: Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Manufacturing (Surface Coating)................ 2060-AG99
19 Phase I Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs) To Reduce the Regional Transport of Ozone 2060-AH87
in the Eastern United States..........................................................
20 Control of Emissions from Nonroad Large Spark Ignition Engines, Recreational Engines 2060-AI11
(Marine and Land-based), and Highway Motorcycles......................................
21 Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter............ 2060-AI44
22 Rulemakings for the Purpose of Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport..................... 2060-AJ20
23 Electric Utility Steam Generating Unit MACT Regulation................................. 2060-AJ65
24 Groundwater and Pesticide Management Plan Rule......................................... 2060-AC46
25 Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.................................................. 2070-AD26
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Significant: A rulemaking that is not economically
significant but is considered significant by the agency. This
category includes rules that are an EPA priority and rules that EPA
anticipates will be reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 12866
because they are likely to:
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of
recipients; or
Raise novel legal or policy issues.
Substantive, Nonsignificant: A rulemaking that has substantive
impacts but is neither Significant, nor Routine and Frequent, nor
Informational/Administrative/Other.
Routine and Frequent: A rulemaking that is a specific case of
a recurring application of a regulatory program in the Code of
Federal Regulations and that does not alter the body of the
regulation.
Informational/Administrative/Other: A rulemaking that is
primarily informational or pertains to agency matters not central
to accomplishing the agency's regulatory mandate but that the
agency places in the Agenda to inform the public of the activity.
Also, if we believe that a rule may be ``major'' as defined in
the congressional review provisions of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) (5 U.S.C. 801; Public
Law 104-121) because it is likely to result in an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more or meets other criteria
specified in this law, we indicate this under the ``Priority''
heading with the statement ``Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.''
Legal Authority: The sections of the United States Code
(U.S.C.), Public Law (P.L.), Executive Order (E.O.), or common name
of the law that authorizes the regulatory action.
CFR Citation: The sections of the Code of Federal Regulations
that will be affected by the action.
Legal Deadline: An indication of whether the rule is subject to
a statutory or judicial deadline, the date of that deadline, and
whether the deadline pertains to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, a
Final Action, or some other action.
Abstract: A brief description of the problem the regulation
will address; the need for a Federal solution; to the extent
available, the alternatives that the agency is considering to
address the problem; and the potential advantages and disadvantages
of the action.
Timetable: The dates (and citations) that documents for this
action were published in the Federal Register and, where possible,
a projected date for the next step. Projected publication dates
frequently change during the course of a rule development. The
projections in the Agenda are our best estimates as of the date we
submit the Agenda for publication. For some entries, the timetable
indicates that the date of the next action is ``to be determined.''
[[Page 62243]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Indicates whether EPA
has prepared or anticipates that it will be preparing a regulatory
flexibility analysis under section 603 or 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Generally, such an analysis is required for
proposed or final rules that EPA believes may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small Entities Affected: Indicates whether we expect the rule
to have any effect on small entities.
Government Levels Affected: Indicates whether we expect the
rule to have any effect on levels of government and, if so, whether
the governments are State, local, tribal, or Federal.
Federalism Implications: Indicates whether the action is
expected to have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Unfunded Mandates: Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act requires an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits if a
rule includes a mandate that may result in expenditures of more
than $100 million in any one year by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector. If we
expect to exceed this $100 million threshold, we note it in this
section.
Energy Impacts: Indicates whether the action is a significant
energy action under Executive Order 13211.
Agency Contact: The name, address, phone number, and e-mail
address, if available, of a person who is knowledgeable about the
regulation.
SAN Number: A code number that EPA uses to identify and track
rulemakings.
RIN: The Regulatory Identifier Number is used by OMB to
identify and track rulemakings. The first four digits of the RIN
stand for the EPA office with lead responsibility for developing
the action.
F. What Additional Information Is in Regulatory Plan Entries?
Regulatory Plan entries contain all of the categories of
information that are in Agenda entries and also include the
following six types of information:
Statement of Need
Statement of the Legal Basis
Alternatives
Anticipated Costs and Benefits
Risks
G. What Tools Are Available To Help Quickly Identify Actions That Are
of Interest to You?
The Regulatory Information Service Center (RISC), the
Government Printing Office (GPO), and the EPA have created a number
of aids to help you find actions that are of interest to you.
For Rules That Directly Affect a Particular Industry: See
Appendix F ``Environmental Protection Agency Subject Index to the
Unified Agenda.'' If you have access to the Internet, you can use
the EPA Regulatory Agenda search engine which is located in the
Small Business Regulatory Library section of the EPA Web site at
www.epa.gov/regagenda. Click on ``Search Regulatory Action
Database'' and then ``Access the Database''. This tool can be used
to search all Agenda entries by keyword and we invite everyone to
use it. The GPO also has a search engine which is located at .
For Rules With Impacts on Small Businesses, Small Governments, and
Small Organizations:
Go to Appendix B following this Agenda for the lists of the
rules that we expect may have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. These lists are also available on the
Internet. The small businesses list is at
http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/ua/ October2001/entities/sm--index-2.html
.
The small governments list is at
http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/ua/October2001/entities/sm--index-3.html
.
And the small organizations list is at
http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/ua/ October2001/entities/sm--index-4.html
.
For Rules That We Expect Will Have Some Impact on Some Small Entities
but Less Than a Significant Impact on a Substantial Number of Them:
See Appendix C following this Agenda, ``Index to Entries That
May Affect Small Entities When a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Is
Not Required.'' This list is available on the Internet at
http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/ua/October2001/entities/smgov-5.html
.
For Rules With Impacts on State, Local, Tribal, or Federal Government,
or Other Federal Agencies:
See Appendix D following this Agenda, ``Index to Entries That
May Affect Government Levels.'' This list is available on the
Internet at
http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/ua/October2001/entities/smgov-8.html
.
H. How Can You Access Federal Register Documents and Interpretive
Guidance via the Internet and via E-mail?
Like many organizations in the public and private sector, EPA
is harnessing the power of the Internet to meet the needs of those
we serve. The EPA Web site offers more than 100,000 files online.
If you want to get automatic e-mails about areas of particular
interest as they appear in the Federal Register (FR), we maintain
12 collections including: air; water; wastes and emergency
response; pesticides; toxic substances; right-to-know and toxic
release inventory; environmental impacts; endangered species;
meetings; the Science Advisory Board; daily full-text notices with
page numbers; and general information. For more information and to
subscribe via our FR Web site, visit: http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/
subscribe.htm. If you have e-mail without full Internet access,
please send an e-mail to envsubset@epa.gov to request instructions
for subscribing to the EPA Federal Register listservers.
Several Web sites allow access to the full text of Federal
Register documents.
The Government Printing Office site has a number of databases
online including the Unified Agenda and the Federal Register
07going back to 1994. This site
is the official source for the
electronic Federal Register07. It provides
public access via telnet, Internet, and
dial-up connection and is located at
http://www.access.gpo.gov/su--docs/aces/aces140.html
.
EPA's site (http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/) has
environmental rules issued by EPA and other Federal agencies dating
back to October 1994 and lets you search by date, page citation or
keyword. It includes links to the Regulatory Information Service Center
and Government Printing Office sites. We also have a Regulatory Agenda
search engine at: http://www.epa/regagenda. To use, first select
``Search Regulatory Action
[[Page 62244]]
Database'' and then select ``Access the Database''.
The Regulatory Information Service Center of the General
Services Administration maintains a site to help users who want to find
information about Federal, State, and local regulations at http://
www.reginfo.gov/
. This site includes links to all agencies' regulatory
agendas and regulatory plans going back to October 1995.
In the ``Additional Information'' section of many of the
entries in this Agenda we include the Internet address for
documents that we have already published as part of the rulemaking.
We have recently opened an Internet site through which you can
access a collection of non-binding guidance materials issued by EPA
Headquarters offices since January 1, 1999. The collection includes
non-binding guidance documents which explain what must be done to
meet environmental requirements or explain how EPA will exercise
its discretion in implementing statutory or regulatory
requirements. The collection is located at: http://www.epa.gov/guidance/
I. What Special Attention Do We Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small
Entities?
For each of our rulemakings we consider whether there will be
any adverse impact on any small entity. We attempt to fit the
regulatory requirements, to the extent feasible and appropriate, to
the scale of the businesses, organizations, and governmental
jurisdictions subject to the regulation. As required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), for rules on which we expect
there will be a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities, we convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel to
consider the rulemaking. We also prepare regulatory flexibility
analyses on these rules. See Appendix B at the end of the Agenda,
``Index to Environmental Protection Agency Entries for which a
Regulatory Flexiblity Analysis is Required'' for a list of these
rules. See Appendix C for a list of the rules that may affect small
entities, but which will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of them.
As required by section 610 of the RFA, we review within 10
years of issuance all rules that were projected to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This year we have no rules scheduled for section 610
review.
J. Why Participate and How To Do It Most Effectively?
You may participate by contacting the expert responsible for
developing a particular action. You may also participate by
commenting on proposed rules that we publish in the Federal
Register. Once we have proposed a rule, we will consider your
comments and address them before issuing a final rule. To be most
effective, comments should contain information and data that
support your position, and you also should explain why we should
incorporate your suggestion in the final rule. You can be
particularly helpful and persuasive if you provide examples to
illustrate your concerns and offer specific alternatives.
We believe that the best approach to making our rules more
cost-effective and fairer includes having those of you who are
stakeholders in a problem work with us in deciding on the solution.
We urge you to participate with us in this process.
Dated: October 15, 2001.
Thomas J. Gibson,
Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation.
GENERAL--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3334 SAN No. 4056 Utilization of Small, Minority and Women's Business Enterprises in 2020-AA39
Procurement Under Assistance Agreements.............................................
3335 SAN No. 4191 Revision to EPAAR 1552.211-73, Level of Effort........................ 2030-AA64
3336 SAN No. 4319 Revisions to Acquisition Regulation Concerning Conflict of Interest... 2030-AA67
3337 SAN No. 3580 Incorporation of Class Deviations Into EPAAR.......................... 2030-AA37
3338 SAN No. 3876 Incrementally Funding Fixed Price Contracts........................... 2030-AA50
3339 SAN No. 3817 Implementation of Changes to Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension 2030-AA48
Common Rule.........................................................................
3340 SAN No. 3933 Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in 2020-AA34
Antarctica..........................................................................
3341 SAN No. 4292 Proposed Revision to EPA's Implementing NEPA Regulations.............. 2020-AA42
3342 SAN No. 4618 Revision of Procedural Rules for Hearings on Cancellations, 2020-AA44
Suspensions, Changes in Classifications, and Denials of Pesticide Registrations.....
3343 SAN No. 3240 Public Information and Confidentiality Regulations.................... 2025-AA02
3344 SAN No. 4463 Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) Pollutants Strategy...... 2070-AD45
3345 SAN No. 4473 Regulatory Incentives for the National Environmental Achievement Track 2090-AA13
Program (Reg Plan Seq No. 117)....................................................
3346 SAN No. 4536 Project XL Site Specific Rulemaking for NASA White Sands Test Facility 2090-AA27
Electronic Reporting in Las Cruces, New Mexico......................................
3347 SAN No. 4533 New Jersey Gold Track Project XL Rule................................. 2090-AA28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
[[Page 62245]]
GENERAL--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3348 SAN No. 4187 EPAAR Coverage on Local Hiring and Training........................... 2030-AA62
3349 SAN No. 4021 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Race, Color, National Origin, 2020-AA36
Handicap, and Age in Programs and Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.
3350 SAN No. 4180 Rewriting of EPA Regulations Implementing the Freedom of Information 2025-AA04
Act.................................................................................
3351 SAN No. 4270 Cross-Media Electronic Reporting (ER) and Recordkeeping Rule (Reg Plan 2025-AA07
Seq No. 148)......................................................................
3352 SAN No. 4185 Electronic Funds Transfer............................................. 2030-AA57
3353 SAN No. 4351 Notice to Proceed..................................................... 2030-AA68
3354 SAN No. 4400 Administrative Corrections to EPAAR 1515, Contracting by Negotiation.. 2030-AA73
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
GENERAL--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3355 SAN No. 3807 Consolidation of Good Laboratory Practice Standards (GLPS) Regulations 2020-AA26
Currently Under TSCA and FIFRA Into One Rule........................................
3356 SAN No. 4572 Fellowship Grant Regulation Revision.................................. 2030-AA77
3357 SAN No. 4589 Empowerment Through Delegations of Authority and Miscellaneous 2030-AA78
Amendments..........................................................................
3358 SAN No. 3671 Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment............................. 2080-AA06
3359 SAN No. 4530 EPA Draft Agencywide Public Involvement Policy........................ 2090-AA23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3360 SAN No. 4226 Incorporating Informal Clauses (EP) Into the EPAAR.................... 2030-AA66
3361 SAN No. 4533 New Jersey Gold Track Project XL Rule................................. 2002-AA00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3362 SAN No. 3263 Performance Warranty and Inspection/Maintenance Test Procedures....... 2060-AE20
3363 SAN No. 3262 Inspection/Maintenance Recall Requirements............................ 2060-AE22
3364 SAN No. 3553 Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter (PM) National Ambient 2060-AF34
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations (Reg Plan Seq No. 119)
3365 SAN No. 3412 Operating Permits: Revisions (Part 70) (Reg Plan Seq No. 120)....... 2060-AF70
3366 SAN No. 3649 Amendments to Method 24 (Water-Based Coatings)........................ 2060-AF72
3367 SAN No. 3820 NESHAP: Plywood and Composite Wood Products (Reg Plan Seq No. 121).. 2060-AG52
3368 SAN No. 3969 NESHAP: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills............................... 2060-AH13
3369 SAN No. 3917 Transportation Conformity Rule Amendment: Clarification of Trading 2060-AH31
Provisions..........................................................................
3370 SAN No. 3910 Streamlined Evaporative Test Procedures............................... 2060-AH34
3371 SAN No. 4045 Rulemaking To Modify the List of Source Categories From Which Fugitive 2060-AH58
Emissions Are Considered in Major Source Determinations.............................
3372 SAN No. 4111 NESHAP: Fumed Silica Production....................................... 2060-AH72
3373 SAN No. 4104 NESHAP: Hydrochloric Acid Production Industry......................... 2060-AH75
3374 SAN No. 4107 NESHAP: Asphalt/Coal Tar Application on Metal Pipes................... 2060-AH78
3375 SAN No. 4113 NESHAP: Clay Minerals Processing...................................... 2060-AH79
3376 SAN No. 4098 NESHAP: Uranium Hexafluoride Production............................... 2060-AH83
3377 SAN No. 4119 Performance Specification 16 - Specifications and Test Procedures for 2060-AH84
Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources........................
3378 SAN No. 4003 Technical Change to Dose Methodology for 40 CFR 191, Subpart A........ 2060-AH90
[[Page 62246]]
3379 SAN No. 4464 Rulemaking on Section 126 Petitions from New York and Connecticut 2060-AJ36
Regarding Sources in Michigan.......................................................
3380 SAN No. 4580 Withdrawal of Amendments for Testing and Monitoring Provisions to 2060-AJ85
Parts 60, 61, and 63................................................................
3381 SAN No. 1002 NAAQS: Sulfur Dioxide (Response to Remand) (Reg Plan Seq No. 118)... 2060-AA61
3382 SAN No. 3656 NESHAP: Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine (Reg Plan Seq No. 2060-AG63
122)..............................................................................
3383 SAN No. 3657 NESHAP: Combustion Turbine (Reg Plan Seq No. 123)................... 2060-AG67
3384 SAN No. 3343 NESHAP: Iron Foundries and Steel Foundries............................ 2060-AE43
3385 SAN No. 3452 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: 2060-AE82
Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing and Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing
3386 SAN No. 3449 NESHAP: Chlorine Production........................................... 2060-AE85
3387 SAN No. 3825 NESHAP: Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products (Surface Coating)...... 2060-AG56
3388 SAN No. 3655 NESHAP: Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing.......... 2060-AG66
3389 SAN No. 3652 NESHAP: Refractory Products Manufacturing............................. 2060-AG68
3390 SAN No. 3837 NESHAP: Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers and Process 2060-AG69
Heaters (Reg Plan Seq No. 124)....................................................
3391 SAN No. 3651 NESHAP: Lime Manufacturing............................................ 2060-AG72
3392 SAN No. 3902 NESHAP: Semiconductor Production...................................... 2060-AG93
3393 SAN No. 3906 NESHAP: Metal Can (Surface Coating) Industry.......................... 2060-AG96
3394 SAN No. 3909 NESHAP: Fabric Printing, Coating and Dyeing........................... 2060-AG98
3395 SAN No. 3907 NESHAP: Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks (Reg Plan 2060-AG99
Seq No. 125)......................................................................
3396 SAN No. 3924 NESHAP: Primary Magnesium Refining.................................... 2060-AH03
3397 SAN No. 2841 NESHAP: Chromium Electroplating Amendment............................. 2060-AH08
3398 SAN No. 3968 NESHAP: Site Remediation.............................................. 2060-AH12
3399 SAN No. 3972 NESHAP: Rocket Engine Test Firing..................................... 2060-AH35
3400 SAN No. 3971 NESHAP: Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline)................... 2060-AH41
3401 SAN No. 3939 NESHAP: Group I Polymers and Resins and Group IV Polymers and Resins- 2060-AH47
Amendments..........................................................................
3402 SAN No. 3479 Amendments to Parts 51, 52, 63, 70 and 71 Regarding the Provisions for 2060-AI01
Determining Potential To Emit.......................................................
3403 SAN No. 4546 NESHAP: Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)-Amendments II........... 2060-AJ66
3404 SAN No. 3824 Metal Furniture (Surface Coating) NESHAP.............................. 2060-AG55
3405 SAN No. 3826 Plastic Parts and Products (Surface Coating) NESHAP................... 2060-AG57
3406 SAN No. 3904 NESHAP: Wood Building Products (Surface Coating)...................... 2060-AH02
3407 SAN No. 3139 Location of Selective Enforcement Audits of Foreign Manufactured 2060-AD90
Vehicles and Engines; Amendment.....................................................
3408 SAN No. 3979 Review of Federal Test Procedures for Emissions From Motor Vehicles; 2060-AH38
Test Procedure Adjustments to Fuel Economy and Emission Test Results................
3409 SAN No. 3673 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Reconsideration of Section 608 2060-AG20
Sales Restriction...................................................................
3410 SAN No. 4542 Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for the Billings/Laurel, Montana 2008-AA00
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Area...........................................................
3411 SAN No. 4487 Federal Implementation Plans for Indian Reservations in Idaho, Oregon 2012-AA01
and Washington......................................................................
3412 SAN No. 4511 Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs 2050-AE85
Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(7); Third Party Audit Provisions............
3413 SAN No. 4115 NESHAP: Chromium Electroplating Amendment............................. 2060-AH69
3414 SAN No. 4154 Control of Emissions from Nonroad Large Spark Ignition Engines, 2060-AI11
Recreational Engines (Marine and Land-based), and Highway Motorcycles...............
3415 SAN No. 4255 Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate 2060-AI44
Matter (Reg Plan Seq No. 126).....................................................
3416 SAN No. 4340 Transportation Conformity Amendments: Response to March 2, 1999, Court 2060-AI56
Decision (Reg Plan Seq No. 127)...................................................
3417 SAN No. 4309 National VOC Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Proposed 2060-AI62
Amendments..........................................................................
3418 SAN No. 4310 NESHAP for the Printing and Publishing Industry; Amendments........... 2060-AI66
3419 SAN No. 4325 NESHAP: Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing.............. 2060-AI67
3420 SAN No. 4343 NESHAP: Clay Ceramics Manufacturing................................... 2060-AI68
3421 SAN No. 4144 NESHAP: Engine Test Cells/Stands...................................... 2060-AI74
3422 SAN No. 4306 Development of Reference Method for the Determination of Source 2060-AI96
Emissions of Filterable Fine Particulate Matter as PM2.5............................
3423 SAN No. 4348 Inspection Maintenance Program Requirements for Federal Facilities; 2060-AI97
Amendment to the Final Rule.........................................................
3424 SAN No. 4393 Control of Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)......................... 2060-AJ00
3425 SAN No. 4380 NESHAP: Taconite Iron Ore Processing Industry......................... 2060-AJ02
[[Page 62247]]
3426 SAN No. 4390 Utility Sector New Source Review (NSR) Alternative Compliance Program. 2060-AJ14
3427 SAN No. 4433 Interstate Ozone Transport: Response to Court Decisions on the NOx SIP 2060-AJ16
Call, NOx SIP Call Technical Amendments, and Section 126 Rules......................
3428 SAN No. 4460 NESHAP for Friction Products Manufacturing............................ 2060-AJ18
3429 SAN No. 4466 Rulemakings for the Purpose of Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport 2060-AJ20
(Reg Plan Seq No. 128)............................................................
3430 SAN No. 4415 Petitions to Delist Source Categories from the Source Category List, 2060-AJ23
Developed Pursuant to Section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act...........................
3431 SAN No. 4421 Revising Regulations on Ambient Air Quality Monitoring................ 2060-AJ25
3432 SAN No. 4426 Clarification to Existing Part 63 NESHAP Delegations' Provisions-Work 2060-AJ26
Practices...........................................................................
3433 SAN No. 4441 Federal Plan Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste 2060-AJ28
Incineration Units Constructed on or Before November 30, 1999.......................
3434 SAN No. 4448 Revisions to Part 97 Federal NOx Budget Trading Program Allowance 2060-AJ30
Allocation Method and Part 75 Output and Emissions Monitoring Provisions............
3435 SAN No. 4457 NESHAP: Pesticides Active Ingredients--Amendments..................... 2060-AJ34
3436 SAN No. 4479 NESHAP: Gasoline Distribution Facilities -- Amendment................. 2060-AJ42
3437 SAN No. 4484 NESHAP: Amino/Phenolic Resins: Amendment.............................. 2060-AJ45
3438 SAN No. 4494 Indoor Air Toxics Strategy............................................ 2060-AJ49
3439 SAN No. 4495 Revisions to Regional Haze Rule to Incorporate Sulfur Dioxide 2060-AJ50
Milestones and Backstop Emissions Trading Program for Nine Western States...........
3440 SAN No. 4524 NESHAP: Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry, Amendments to Rule to 2060-AJ57
Implement Settlement Agreement......................................................
3441 SAN No. 4531 Evaluation of Updated Test Procedures for the Certification of 2060-AJ61
Gasoline Deposit Control Additives..................................................
3442 SAN No. 4532 Motor Vehicle and Engine Compliance Program Fees for: Light-Duty 2060-AJ62
Vehicles and Trucks; Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Engines; Nonroad Engines; and
Motorcycles.........................................................................
3443 SAN No. 4571 Electric Utility Steam Generating Unit MACT Regulation (Reg Plan Seq 2060-AJ65
No. 129)..........................................................................
3444 SAN No. 4555 Electric Arc Furnace NSPS Amendment................................... 2060-AJ68
3445 SAN No. 4558 Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments: Minor Revision and Addition 2060-AJ70
of Grace Period for Newly Designated Nonattainment Areas............................
3446 SAN No. 4570 Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles and Engines: Alternative 2060-AJ72
Low-Sulfur Highway Diesel Fuel Transition Program for Alaska........................
3447 SAN No. 4573 Non-Conformance Penalties for 2004 and Later Model Year Heavy-Duty 2060-AJ73
Diesel Engines and Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles.......................................
3448 SAN No. 4574 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Assorted Amendments to the Phaseout 2060-AJ74
of Class I Controlled Substances - Changes Under the Montreal Protocol..............
3449 SAN No. 4583 Modification of Federal On-board Diagnostic Regulations for 2004 Model 2060-AJ77
Year Vehicles Below 14,000 Pounds...................................................
3450 SAN No. 4592 Regulation to Establish New Date for Receipt of Summer Grade RFG at 2060-AJ79
Terminals...........................................................................
3451 SAN No. 4593 Relaxation of Summer Gasoline Volatility Standard for Denver/Boulder 2060-AJ80
Area................................................................................
3452 SAN No. 4594 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Allocation of Year 2002 Essential 2060-AJ81
Use Allowances......................................................................
3453 SAN No. 4547 Modification of Authority to Grant Alternative Method Approvals....... 2060-AJ83
3454 SAN No. 4584 Performance Specifications for Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems 2060-AJ86
3455 SAN No. 4591 Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP; Amendments........................... 2060-AJ87
3456 SAN No. 4605 Propsed Amendments to Performance Standards and Monitoring 2060-AJ88
Requirements for Particulate Matter at Stationary Sources...........................
3457 SAN No. 4626 Control of Emissions from Spark Ignition Marine Vessels and Highway 2060-AJ90
Motorcycles.........................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3458 SAN No. 3569 Source-Specific Federal Implementation Plan for Navajo Generating 2009-AA01
Station; Four Corners Power Plant...................................................
3459 SAN No. 3259 New Source Review (NSR) Improvement (Reg Plan Seq No. 139).......... 2060-AE11
3460 SAN No. 3380 NSPS: Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Industry - Wastewater 2060-AE94
(Final) & Amend. to Appendix C of Part 63 & Appendix J of Part 60...................
[[Page 62248]]
3461 SAN No. 3549 NESHAP: Petroleum Refineries; Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic 2060-AF28
Reforming Units and Sulfur Recovery Units...........................................
3462 SAN No. 2915 Methods for Measurement of Visible Emissions--Addition of Methods 2060-AF83
203A, 203B, and 203C to Appendix M of Part 51.......................................
3463 SAN No. 3741 Service Information Regulation for Light-Duty Vehicles and Trucks..... 2060-AG13
3464 SAN No. 3900 Addition of Method 207 to Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51 Method for 2060-AG88
Measuring Isocyanates in Stationary Source Emissions................................
3465 SAN No. 3970 NESHAP: Cellulose Production Manufacturing............................ 2060-AH11
3466 SAN No. 3986 Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule................................. 2060-AH25
3467 SAN No. 4030 Expanded Definitions for Alternative-Fueled Vehicles and Engines 2060-AH52
Meeting Low-Emission Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards.............................
3468 SAN No. 4022 NESHAP: Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks............ 2060-AH55
3469 SAN No. 4120 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Allowance System for Controlling 2060-AH67
HCFC Production, Import & Export....................................................
3470 SAN No. 4114 NESHAP: Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production.................. 2060-AH82
3471 SAN No. 4096 Phase I Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs) To Reduce the Regional 2060-AH87
Transport of Ozone in the Eastern United States.....................................
3472 SAN No. 4082 NESHAP: Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production.......................... 2060-AH89
3473 SAN No. 4077 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Reconsideration on the 610 2060-AH99
Nonessential Products Ban...........................................................
3474 SAN No. 4254 Revision to the Definition of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) to 2060-AI45
Exclude Tertiary Butyl Acetate......................................................
3475 SAN No. 3470 Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of State 2060-AF01
Implementation Plans (Guideline on Air Quality Models)..............................
3476 SAN No. 3340 NESHAP: Primary Copper Smelting....................................... 2060-AE46
3477 SAN No. 3346 NESHAP: Integrated Iron and Steel..................................... 2060-AE48
3478 SAN No. 3326 NESHAP: Reinforced Plastic Composites Production...................... 2060-AE79
3479 SAN No. 3551 Amendments to General Provisions Subparts A and B for 40 CFR 63....... 2060-AF31
3480 SAN No. 3746 NESHAP: Paint Stripping Operations.................................... 2060-AG26
3481 SAN No. 3749 NESHAP: Tire Manufacturing............................................ 2060-AG29
3482 SAN No. 3823 NESHAP: Large Appliance (Surface Coating)............................. 2060-AG54
3483 SAN No. 3905 NESHAP: Metal Coil (Surface Coating) Industry......................... 2060-AG97
3484 SAN No. 3964 NESHAP: Leather Finishing Operations.................................. 2060-AH17
3485 SAN No. 2665 Importation of Nonconforming Vehicles; Amendments to Regulations...... 2060-AI03
3486 SAN No. 3556 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Supplemental Rule Regarding a 2060-AF36
Recycling Standard Under Section 608................................................
3487 SAN No. 3560 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Refrigerant Recycling Rule 2060-AF37
Amendment To Include Substitute Refrigerants........................................
3488 SAN No. 3827 Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP.................................... 2060-AG58
3489 SAN No. 4315 Source-Specific Federal Implementation Plan for Navajo Generating 2009-AA00
Station; Navajo Nation..............................................................
3490 SAN No. 4105 NESHAP: Generic MACT for Carbon Black, Ethylene, Cynaide and Spandex.. 2060-AH68
3491 SAN No. 4316 NESHAP for Ethylene Oxide Commercial Sterilization Operations- 2060-AI64
Monitoring Amendments...............................................................
3492 SAN No. 4313 Petitions to Delist Hazardous Air Pollutants (e.g., MEK, EGBE, 2060-AI72
Methanol, and MIBK) from Section 112(b)(1) of the CAA...............................
3493 SAN No. 4273 Amend Subpart H and I, 40 CFR Part 61, for Emissions of Radionuclides 2060-AI90
Other Than Radon From DOE Facilities................................................
3494 SAN No. 4299 Revision to Method 24 for Electrical Insulating Varnishes............. 2060-AI94
3495 SAN No. 4449 NESHAP for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operations.......... 2060-AJ19
3496 SAN No. 4428 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Phaseout of Chlorobromomethane 2060-AJ27
(Halon 1011) Production and Consumption.............................................
3497 SAN No. 4442 NESHAP for Source Categories: Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing and 2060-AJ29
Phosphate Fertilizers Production -- Amendments......................................
3498 SAN No. 4450 Guidelines for Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART).............. 2060-AJ31
3499 SAN No. 4478 Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Municipal Solid 2060-AJ41
Waste Landfills: Amendment..........................................................
3500 SAN No. 4538 Revisions to the Part 97 Federal NOx Budget Trading Program, the Part 2060-AJ43
75 Emissions Monitoring Provisions, the Part 72 Permits Regulation Provisions, and
the Part 78 Appeal Procedures.......................................................
3501 SAN No. 4454 Federal Plan for Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units............... 2060-AJ46
3502 SAN No. 4491 Section 126 Rule Revision Correcting NOx Allowance Allocations for 2060-AJ47
Certain Units in the Federal NOx Budget Trading Program.............................
[[Page 62249]]
3503 SAN No. 4507 Standards of Performance for New Sources and Emission Guidelines for 2060-AJ52
Existing Sources: Large Municipal Waste Combustors Amendment of Startup, Shutdown,
and Malfunction Provisions..........................................................
3504 SAN No. 4508 Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Volatile Organic 2060-AJ53
Liquid Storage Vessels; Amendments..................................................
3505 SAN No. 4528 Modification of the Anti-Dumping Baseline Date Cut-Off Limit for Data 2060-AJ59
Used in Development of an Individual Baseline.......................................
3506 SAN No. 4529 Change in the Definition of Major Source for Operating Permits........ 2060-AJ60
3507 SAN No. 4554 Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Mobile Sources; Correction... 2060-AJ67
3508 SAN No. 4569 Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles; Second Amendment to 2060-AJ71
the Tier 2/Gasoline Sulfur Regulations..............................................
3509 SAN No. 4604 Modification of the Anti-Dumping Baseline Date Cut-Off Limit for Data 2060-AJ82
Used in Development of an Individual Baseline.......................................
3510 SAN No. 4548 Compilation of Source-Specific Alternative Methods Being Approved for 2060-AJ84
Source-Category Wide Application....................................................
3511 SAN No. 4600 State and Federal Operating Permits Program: Removal of Amendments to 2060-AJ89
Part 70 and Part 71 Compliance Certification Requirements...........................
3512 SAN No. 4278 Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for Andersen Corporation's 2090-AA21
Facility in Bayport, Minnesota......................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3513 SAN No. 3922 Revised Permit Revision Procedures for the Federal Operating Permits 2060-AG92
Program.............................................................................
3514 SAN No. 3958 Addition of Opacity Method to Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51 (Method 2060-AH23
203)................................................................................
3515 SAN No. 3975 Review of Minor New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country....... 2060-AH37
3516 SAN No. 4046 Federal Major New Source Review (NSR) Program for Nonattainment Areas. 2060-AH53
3517 SAN No. 4070 General Conformity Regulations; Revisions............................. 2060-AH93
3518 SAN No. 4247 Revisions to Air Pollution Emergency Episode Requirements (Subpart H, 2060-AI47
40 CFR Part 51).....................................................................
3519 SAN No. 3638 Revision of EPA's Radiological Emergency Response Plan................ 2060-AI49
3520 SAN No. 4162 NESHAP: Oil and Natural Gas Production................................ 2060-AI13
3521 SAN No. 2937 Field Citation Program................................................ 2020-AA32
3522 SAN No. 3751 NSPS and Emission Guidelines for Other Solid Waste Incinerators....... 2060-AG31
3523 SAN No. 3919 Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality: Permit 2060-AH01
Application Review Procedures for Non-Federal Class I Areas.........................
3524 SAN No. 3525 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Update of the Substitutes List 2060-AG12
Under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program........................
3525 SAN No. 4607 Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs 2050-AE95
Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(7); Availability of Information to the
Public; Technical Amendment.........................................................
3526 SAN No. 4619 Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs 2050-AE96
Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(3); Revisions to the List of Substances.....
3527 SAN No. 4253 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Quarantine 2060-AI42
and Preshipment Methyl Bromide and Trade Ban With Non-Parties to the Montreal
Protocol............................................................................
3528 SAN No. 4266 Review National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide..... 2060-AI43
3529 SAN No. 4276 Revision to NOx SIP Call Emission Budgets for Connecticut, 2060-AI80
Massachusetts and Rhode Island......................................................
3530 SAN No. 4383 Interstate Ozone Transport: Rulemaking on Section 126 Petitions from 2060-AI99
the District of Columbia, Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey........................
3531 SAN No. 4391 Rescinding Finding that Pre-existing PM10 Standards No Longer 2060-AJ05
Applicable in Northern Ada County/Boise, Idaho......................................
3532 SAN No. 4535 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Critical and 2060-AJ63
Emergency Uses of Methyl Bromide....................................................
3533 SAN No. 4585 Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry NESHAP: Amendment to Implement 2060-AJ78
Court Remand........................................................................
3534 SAN No. 4471 Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for Georgia-Pacific Corporation's 2090-AA26
Facility in Big Island, Virginia....................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 62250]]
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3535 SAN No. 3568 Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, 2060-AG14
Nevada..............................................................................
3536 SAN No. 4123 NESHAP: Pulp and Paper Production; Amendments to the Promulgated Rule. 2060-AH74
3537 SAN No. 3550 NESHAP: Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast............................ 2060-AF30
3538 SAN No. 3747 NESHAP: Boat Manufacturing............................................ 2060-AG27
3539 SAN No. 3903 NESHAP: Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production............... 2060-AH22
3540 SAN No. 4245 Consumer and Commercial Products: Flexible Package Printing Materials: 2060-AI31
Determination on Control Techniques Guidelines in Lieu of Regulation................
3541 SAN No. 4274 Identification of Additional Ozone Areas Attaining the 1-Hour Standard 2060-AI57
and to Which the 1-Hour Standard Is No Longer Applicable (7 Areas)..................
3542 SAN No. 4346 NESHAP: Lightweight Aggregate Manufacturing........................... 2060-AI75
3543 SAN No. 4358 Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Reformulated Gasoline 2060-AI98
Adjustment..........................................................................
3544 SAN No. 4413 NESHAP: Aluminum Die Casting and Aluminum Foundries................... 2060-AJ09
3545 SAN No. 4417 Removal of Aluminum Die Casting and Aluminum Foundries From the 2060-AJ11
Secondary Aluminum NESHAP and Applicability Stay for These Industries...............
3546 SAN No. 4410 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone Allocation of Essential-Use 2060-AJ15
Allowances for Calendar Year 2001: Laboratory Essential Use Exemptions..............
3547 SAN No. 4458 NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production: Direct Final Amendments........ 2060-AJ17
3548 SAN No. 4492 Revision to Interim Approval Requirements............................. 2060-AJ48
3549 SAN No. 4506 Standards of Performance for New Sources and Emission Guidelines for 2060-AJ51
Existing Sources: Large Municipal Waste Combustors Amendment of Mass Burn Rotary
Waterwall Definition................................................................
3550 SAN No. 4510 Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles Amendments to the 2060-AJ54
Tier 2/Gasoline Sulfur Regulations..................................................
3551 SAN No. 4520 Petition by Colorado To Relax the Reid Vapor Pressure Standard for 2060-AJ55
Gasoline for 2001...................................................................
3552 SAN No. 4522 NESHAP: Amendments to Ferroalloys Production.......................... 2060-AJ56
3553 SAN No. 4544 NESHAP: Ferroalloy Production: Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese..... 2060-AJ64
3554 SAN No. 4557 Revision to the Requirements on Variability in the Composition of 2060-AJ69
Additives Certified Under the Gasoline Deposit Control Program; Direct Final and
Proposed Rules......................................................................
3555 SAN No. 4564 Prohibitions on Gasoline Containing Lead or Lead Additives for Highway 2060-AJ76
Use: Fuel Inlet Restrictor Exclusion for Motorcycles................................
3556 SAN No. 4517 Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for Weyerhaeuser Company Flint 2090-AA20
River Operations....................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (AEA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3557 SAN No. 3602 Protective Action Guidance for Drinking Water......................... 2060-AF39
3558 SAN No. 4054 Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for the Disposal of Low- 2060-AH63
Activity Mixed Radioactive Waste....................................................
3559 SAN No. 4403 Revision of the 40 CFR Part 194 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Compliance 2060-AJ07
Criteria............................................................................
3560 SAN No. 4582 Modification of 40 CFR Part 194, Appedix A, Waste Isolation Pilot 2060-AJ75
Plant Certification.................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3561 SAN No. 4610 Acceptability of Research Using Human Subjects (Reg Plan Seq No. 2070-AD57
115)..............................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3562 SAN No. 4143 Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (Reg Plan Seq No. 131)........ 2070-AD26
[[Page 62251]]
3563 SAN No. 4170 Procedures for the Pesticide Registration Review Program.............. 2070-AD29
3564 SAN No. 4173 Data Requirements for Antimicrobial Pesticide Registration............ 2070-AD30
3565 SAN No. 4216 Pesticide Emergency Exemption Regulations (Reg Plan Seq No. 132).... 2070-AD36
3566 SAN No. 4496 Data Requirement for Pesticide Registration; Environmental Fate and 2070-AD47
Ecological Effects..................................................................
3567 SAN No. 4596 Data Requirements; Biochemical and Microbial Pesticides............... 2070-AD51
3568 SAN No. 4609 Exemption of Medical Devices Treated with Antimicrobial Pesticides.... 2070-AD54
3569 SAN No. 4612 Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for PIPs That Act by 2070-AD56
Primarily Affecting the Plant (Reg Plan Seq No. 133)..............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3570 SAN No. 4602 Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Based on 2070-AD49
Viral Coat Proteins (Reg Plan Seq No. 143)........................................
3571 SAN No. 3432 Pesticide Management and Disposal..................................... 2020-AA33
3572 SAN No. 2659 Pesticide Management and Disposal; Standards for Pesticide Containers 2070-AB95
and Containment.....................................................................
3573 SAN No. 3222 Groundwater and Pesticide Management Plan Rule (Reg Plan Seq No. 2070-AC46
140)..............................................................................
3574 SAN No. 3731 WPS; Pesticide Worker Protection Standard; Glove Amendment............ 2070-AC93
3575 SAN No. 3892 Registration Requirements for Antimicrobial Pesticide Products; 2070-AD14
Labeling and Other Regulatory Changes...............................................
3576 SAN No. 4611 Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Derived 2070-AD55
Through Genetic Engineering From Sexually Compatible Plants (Reg Plan Seq No. 144)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3577 SAN No. 4027 Pesticides; Tolerance Processing Fees................................. 2070-AD23
3578 SAN No. 4175 Pesticide Tolerance Reassessment Program.............................. 2070-AD24
3579 SAN No. 2684 Plant Incorporated Protectants (Formerly Plant Pesticides) Rulemakings 2070-AC02
3580 SAN No. 2687 Data Requirements for Pesticide Registration; Toxicology, Exposure and 2070-AC12
Residue Chemistry...................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3581 SAN No. 4598 TSCA Policy Statement on Oversight of Transgenic Organisms (Including 2070-AD53
Plants).............................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3582 SAN No. 2563 Test Rule; ATSDR Substances........................................... 2070-AB79
3583 SAN No. 4174 TSCA Section 4 Enforceable Consent Agreement for Certain Oxygenated 2070-AD28
Fuel Additives......................................................................
3584 SAN No. 4395 Test Rule; Multi-Substance Rule for the Testing of Developmental and 2070-AD44
Reproductive Toxicity...............................................................
3585 SAN No. 1923 Follow-Up Rules on Existing Chemicals................................. 2070-AA58
3586 SAN No. 4512 Significant New Use Rule; Selected Flame Retardant Chemical Substances 2070-AD48
for Use in Residential Upholstered Furniture........................................
[[Page 62252]]
3587 SAN No. 3557 Lead-Based Paint Activities; Training and Certification for Renovation 2070-AC83
and Remodeling (Reg Plan Seq No. 130).............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3588 SAN No. 3301 TSCA Inventory Update Rule Amendments (Reg Plan Seq No. 141)........ 2070-AC61
3589 SAN No. 3493 Test Rule; Generic Entry for ITC Related Testing Decisions............ 2070-AB94
3590 SAN No. 3487 Test Rule; Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)............................ 2070-AC76
3591 SAN No. 3990 Test Rule; Certain High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals............. 2070-AD16
3592 SAN No. 4425 Test Rule; In Vitro Dermal Absorption Rate Testing of Certain 2070-AD42
Chemicals of Interest to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration..........
3593 SAN No. 1976 Follow-Up Rules on Non-5(e) New Chemical Substances................... 2070-AA59
3594 SAN No. 3495 Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Chemical-Specific SNURs To Extend 2070-AB27
Provisions of Section 5(e) Orders...................................................
3595 SAN No. 4475 Significant New Use Rule; Certain Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonyl (Pfos) 2070-AD43
Containing Chemical Substances......................................................
3596 SAN No. 2150 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Exemptions From the Prohibitions 2070-AB20
Against Manufacturing, Processing, and Distribution in Commerce.....................
3597 SAN No. 2779 Acrylamide; Prohibition on Manufacture, Importation, Distribution and 2070-AC17
Use of Acrylamide for Grouting......................................................
3598 SAN No. 2178 TSCA Section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rules............ 2070-AB08
3599 SAN No. 1139 TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rules.............. 2070-AB11
3600 SAN No. 4172 Lead; Notification Requirements for Lead-Based Paint Abatement 2070-AD31
Activities and Training.............................................................
3601 SAN No. 3508 Lead; Management and Disposal of Lead-Based Paint Debris.............. 2070-AC72
3602 SAN No. 3118 TSCA Section 8(e) Policy; Notice of Clarification..................... 2070-AC80
3603 SAN No. 4176 Chemical Right-to-Know Initiative; High Production Volume (HPV) 2070-AD25
Chemicals (Reg Plan Seq No. 142)..................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3604 SAN No. 2865 Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP).............. 2070-AC27
3605 SAN No. 3882 Test Rule; Certain Metals............................................. 2070-AD10
3606 SAN No. 3252 Lead; Regulatory Investigation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act 2070-AC21
(TSCA) To Reduce Lead (Pb) Consumption and Use......................................
3607 SAN No. 3528 Significant New Use Rule; Refractory Ceramic Fibers................... 2070-AC37
3608 SAN No. 3148 Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan Revisions........................... 2070-AC51
3609 SAN No. 4179 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Use Authorizations.................. 2070-AD27
3610 SAN No. 3559 Notice of TSCA Section 4 Reimbursement Period and TSCA Section 12(b) 2070-AC84
Export Notification Period Sunset Dates for TSCA Section 4 Substances...............
3611 SAN No. 4376 Lead-Based Paint Activities; Training, Accreditation, and 2070-AC64
Certification Rule and Model State Plan Rule - Building and Structures..............
3612 SAN No. 4597 Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Implementation Issues.......... 2070-AD52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3613 SAN No. 4490 Toxic Substances Control Act Test Guidelines.......................... 2070-AD50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 62253]]
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3614 SAN No. 4015 TRI; Review of Chemicals on the Original TRI List..................... 2025-AA03
3615 SAN No. 4265 TRI; Revisions to the Otherwise Use Activity Exemptions and the Coal 2025-AA06
Extraction Activities Exemption.....................................................
3616 SAN No. 4392 TRI: APA Petition-EPCRA 313 Definition of Overburden as It Relates to 2025-AA08
the Mining Industry.................................................................
3617 SAN No. 4595 Rulemaking To Change Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting 2025-AA10
Requirements From Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes to North American
Industrial Classification System....................................................
3618 SAN No. 4616 Clarify TRI Reporting Obligations Under EPCRA Section 313 for the 2025-AA11
Metal Mining Activities of Extraction and Beneficiation.............................
3619 SAN No. 3215 Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act: Amendments and 2050-AE17
Streamlining Rule...................................................................
3620 SAN No. 3993 Modification of Threshold Planning Quantity for Isophorone 2050-AE43
Diisocyanate........................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3621 SAN No. 2425 TRI; Responses to Petitions Received To Add or Delete or Modify 2025-AA00
Chemical Listings on the Toxic Release Inventory....................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3622 SAN No. 3007 TRI; Chemical Expansion; Finalization of Deferred Chemicals........... 2025-AA01
3623 SAN No. 2847 TRI; Pollution Prevention Act Information Requirements................ 2025-AA09
3624 SAN No. 3994 Response to a Petition Requesting Deletion of Phosmet From the 2050-AE42
Extremely Hazardous Substances (EHS) List...........................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3625 SAN No. 4094 Land Disposal Restrictions; Potential Revisions for Mercury Listed and 2050-AE54
Characteristic Wastes...............................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3626 SAN No. 3989 Removal of Requirement To Use SW-846 Methods (Test Methods for 2050-AE41
Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods)..................................
3627 SAN No. 4028 Standardized Permit for RCRA Hazardous Waste Management Facilities.... 2050-AE44
3628 SAN No. 3333 NESHAPS: Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste 2050-AE01
Combustors-Phase II Covering Boilers and Certain Industrial Furnaces................
3629 SAN No. 4084 Office of Solid Waste Burden Reduction Project (Reg Plan Seq No. 2050-AE50
134)..............................................................................
3630 SAN No. 4091 Modifications to RCRA Rules Associated With Solvent-Contaminated Shop 2050-AE51
Towels and Wipes....................................................................
3631 SAN No. 4092 Recycling of Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs) and Mercury-Containing 2050-AE52
Equipment: Changes to Hazardous Waste Regulations (Reg Plan Seq No. 135)..........
3632 SAN No. 4230 Revisions to Solid Waste Landfill Criteria--Leachate Recirculation on 2050-AE67
Alternative Liners..................................................................
3633 SAN No. 4419 Amendments to the Corrective Action Management Unit Rule.............. 2050-AE77
3634 SAN No. 4411 Regulation of Oil Bearing Wastes From Petroleum Refineries Gasified To 2050-AE78
Produce Synthesis Gas...............................................................
3635 SAN No. 4501 Revision of Wastewater Treatment Exemptions for Hazardous Waste 2050-AE84
Mixtures............................................................................
3636 SAN No. 4575 Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Location Restrictions for Airport 2050-AE91
Safety..............................................................................
[[Page 62254]]
3637 SAN No. 4588 Research, Development, and Demonstration Permits for Municipal Solid 2050-AE92
Waste Landfill......................................................................
3638 SAN No. 4606 Revisions for Transboundary Shipments of Hazardous Waste for Recovery 2050-AE93
Within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development....................
3639 SAN No. 4534 Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for Anne Arundel County 2090-AA25
Millersville Landfill, Severn, Maryland.............................................
3640 SAN No. 4608 Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for Implementing Waste Treatment 2090-AA30
Systems at Two Virginia Landfills...................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3641 SAN No. 3805 Paint Manufacturing Wastes Listing: Hazardous Waste Management System: 2050-AE32
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste.......................................
3642 SAN No. 4083 Listing of Hazardous Waste; Inorganic Chemical Wastes; Land Disposal 2050-AE49
Restrictions for Newly Listed Wastes; CERCLA Hazardous Substances Reportable
Quantities..........................................................................
3643 SAN No. 3545 Revisions to the Comprehensive Guideline for Procurement of Products 2050-AE23
Containing Recovered Materials......................................................
3644 SAN No. 4208 Requirements for Zinc Fertilizer Made From Recycled Hazardous 2050-AE69
Secondary Materials (Reg Plan Seq No. 145)........................................
3645 SAN No. 4418 NESHAPS: Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste 2050-AE79
Combustors..........................................................................
3646 SAN No. 4566 NESHAPS: Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste 2050-AE90
Combustors - Parallel Proposed Rule.................................................
3647 SAN No. 4615 Definition of Solid Waste; Codification of Mineral Processing Vacature 2050-AE94
(Classification of Battery Recyclers v. EPA) and Discussion of Future Proposed
Rulemaking..........................................................................
3648 SAN No. 4439 Project XL -- Ortho-McNeil Pilot Project Allowing On-Site Treatment of 2090-AA14
Low-Level Mixed Wastes Without RCRA Permit..........................................
3649 SAN No. 4565 Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for the IBM Semiconductor 2090-AA29
Manufacturing Facility in Hopewell Junction, New York...............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3650 SAN No. 3856 Management of Cement Kiln Dust (CKD).................................. 2050-AE34
3651 SAN No. 3189 Final Determination of the Applicability of the Toxicity 2050-AD69
Characteristic Rule to Petroleum Contaminated Media and Debris from Underground
Storage Tanks.......................................................................
3652 SAN No. 3066 Listing Determination of Wastes Generated During the Manufacture of 2050-AD80
Azo, Anthraquinone, and Triarylmethane Dyes and Pigments............................
3653 SAN No. 2647 RCRA Subtitle C Financial Test Criteria (Revision).................... 2050-AC71
3654 SAN No. 3147 Hazardous Waste Manifest Regulation................................... 2050-AE21
3655 SAN No. 4233 Land Disposal Restrictions; Treatment Standards for Spent Potliners 2050-AE65
from Primary Aluminum Reduction (K088) and Regulatory Classification of K088
Vitrification Units.................................................................
3656 SAN No. 4470 Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Wastes Generated by 2050-AE81
Commercial Electric Power Producers.................................................
3657 SAN No. 4469 Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Wastes - Non-Power 2050-AE83
Producers and Minefilling...........................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 62255]]
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3658 SAN No. 3428 Hazardous Waste Management System: Slag Residues Derived From High 2050-AE15
Temperature Metals Recovery (HTMR) Treatment of KO61, KO62 and F0006 Wastes.........
3659 SAN No. 3668 Hazardous Waste Identification; Recycled Used Oil Management Standards 2050-AE28
3660 SAN No. 3888 Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery Management Act; 2050-AE39
Codification of Waste Management Provisions.........................................
3661 SAN No. 4017 Storage, Treatment, Transportation, and Disposal of Mixed Wastes; 2050-AE45
Final Rule..........................................................................
3662 SAN No. 4088 Recycled Used Oil Containing PCBs..................................... 2050-AE47
3663 SAN No. 4090 RCRA Appendix VIII Streamlining....................................... 2050-AE55
3664 SAN No. 2390 Corrective Action for Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) at 2050-AB80
Hazardous Waste Management Facilities...............................................
3665 SAN No. 3328 Hazardous Waste Identification Rule (HWIR): Identification and Listing 2050-AE07
of Hazardous Wastes.................................................................
3666 SAN No. 4093 Reinventing the Land Disposal Restrictions Program.................... 2050-AE53
3667 SAN No. 4263 Temporary Suspension of Toxicity Characteristic Rule for Specific Lead- 2050-AE68
Based Paint Debris..................................................................
3668 SAN No. 4430 RCRA Controls for Wastewater Treatment Units.......................... 2050-AE82
3669 SAN No. 4525 Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and 2050-AE86
Practices and Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: Disposal of Residential
Lead-Based Paint Waste..............................................................
3670 SAN No. 4552 NESHAPS: Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste 2050-AE89
Combustors..........................................................................
3671 SAN No. 4437 Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for the US Filter Recovery 2090-AA15
Services, Roseville, Minnesota, and Approved Generators and Transporters of USFRS XL
Waste...............................................................................
3672 SAN No. 4498 Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for Yolo County Landfill, Davis, 2090-AA18
Yolo County, California.............................................................
3673 SAN No. 4516 Project XL Notice of Proposed Rule for Autoliv Inc. Site-Specific 2090-AA19
Rulemaking..........................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OIL POLLUTION ACT (OPA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3674 SAN No. 2634 Oil Pollution Prevention Regulation: Revisions........................ 2050-AC62
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3675 SAN No. 3423 Reportable Quantity Adjustments for Carbamates........................ 2050-AE12
3676 SAN No. 3439 National Priorities List for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites: 2050-AD75
Proposed and Final Rules............................................................
3677 SAN No. 4177 Revise 40 CFR Part 35 Subpart O: Cooperative Agreements and Superfund 2050-AE62
State Contracts for Superfund Response Actions......................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3678 SAN No. 3929 Final Rule to Correct Typographical Errors and Remove Obsolete 2050-AE88
Language in 40 CFR Part 302.........................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3679 SAN No. 2394 Reporting Exemptions for Federally Permitted Releases of Hazardous 2050-AB82
Substances..........................................................................
3680 SAN No. 3885 Streamlining the Preauthorization Mixed Funding for Application and 2050-AE38
Implementation of Claims Against Superfund..........................................
[[Page 62256]]
3681 SAN No. 4201 Criteria for the Designation of Hazardous Substances Under CERCLA 2050-AE63
Section 102(a)......................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3682 SAN No. 4280 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development 2040-AD42
Industry (Reg Plan Seq No. 137)...................................................
3683 SAN No. 4406 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Aquatic Animal Production 2040-AD55
Industry............................................................................
3684 SAN No. 4407 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Meat Products Point Source 2040-AD56
Category (Revisions)................................................................
3685 SAN No. 4264 Water Quality Standards for Alabama--Phase II......................... 2040-AD35
3686 SAN No. 4377 Test Procedures for the Analysis of Mercury Under the Clean Water Act 2040-AD52
(Method 245.7)......................................................................
3687 SAN No. 4474 Minimizing Adverse Environmental Impact From Cooling Water Intake 2040-AD62
Structures at Existing Facilities Under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, Phase
2 (Reg Plan Seq No. 138)..........................................................
3688 SAN No. 3999 NPDES Permit Requirements for Municipal Sanitary Sewer Collection 2040-AD02
Systems, Municipal Satellite Collection Systems, and Sanitary Sewer Overflows (Reg
Plan Seq No. 136).................................................................
3689 SAN No. 4332 Recognition Awards Under the Clean Water Act.......................... 2040-AD44
3690 SAN No. 4446 Ocean Discharges Criteria Revisions................................... 2040-AD60
3691 SAN No. 4493 Clean Water State Revolving Fund Regulation Revisions Re: Use as 2040-AD68
Matching Funds......................................................................
3692 SAN No. 4540 Test Procedures: New and Updated Test Procedures for the Analysis of 2040-AD71
Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act....................
3693 SAN No. 4541 Test Procedures for the Analysis of Mercury Under the Clean Water Act 2040-AD72
(Revisions to Method 1631)..........................................................
3694 SAN No. 4576 2002 Effluent Guidelines Plan......................................... 2040-AD78
3695 SAN No. 4526 Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution 2050-AE87
Contingency Plan; Subpart J Product Schedule Listing Requirements...................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3696 SAN No. 3833 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing 2040-AC90
Point Source Category (Revisions)...................................................
3697 SAN No. 4192 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Bleached Papergrade Kraft 2040-AD23
Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Category; Certification in Lieu of
Monitoring for Chloroform...........................................................
3698 SAN No. 4168 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Coal Mining Point Source 2040-AD24
Category (Revisions)................................................................
3699 SAN No. 3155 Test Procedures for the Analysis of Miscellaneous Metals, Anions, and 2040-AC95
Volatile Organics Under the Clean Water Act, Phase One..............................
3700 SAN No. 4047 Test Procedures for Analysis for Biological Contaminants Under Clean 2040-AD08
Water Act...........................................................................
3701 SAN No. 4089 Test Procedures for the Analysis of Miscellaneous Metals, Anions, and 2040-AD12
Volatile Organics Under the Clean Water Act, Phase Two..............................
3702 SAN No. 4409 Test Procedures: Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act Methods 2040-AD59
Update..............................................................................
3703 SAN No. 3444 Minimizing Adverse Environmental Impact From Cooling Water Intake 2040-AC34
Structures at New Facilities Under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, Phase 1...
3704 SAN No. 4617 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program Regulations Revisions......... 2040-AD79
3705 SAN No. 3288 Comparison of Dredged Material to Reference Sediment.................. 2040-AC14
3706 SAN No. 4375 Revision to Clean Water Act Regulatory Definition of ``Fill Material'' 2040-AD51
3707 SAN No. 3488 Round 2 Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge............ 2040-AC25
3708 SAN No. 4515 Procedures for Tribes to Obtain Approval for Treatment as a State To 2040-AD69
Receive Funding for the Beaches Program.............................................
3709 SAN No. 4514 Rule To Revise and To Ratify or Withdraw Whole Effluent Toxicity Test 2040-AD73
Methods.............................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 62257]]
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3710 SAN No. 2806 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Metal Products and Machinery 2040-AB79
Category, Phases 1 and 2............................................................
3711 SAN No. 4050 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard 2040-AD10
Category, Phase II..................................................................
3712 SAN No. 4153 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Regulation and 2040-AD19
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations (CAFOs)..................................................................
3713 SAN No. 4370 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Dissolving Kraft and 2040-AD49
Dissolving Sulfite Subcategories of the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Point Source
Category (Phase III)................................................................
3714 SAN No. 4408 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Industrial Container and 2040-AD57
Drum Cleaning Point Source Category.................................................
3715 SAN No. 3662 Water Quality Standards Regulation -- Revision........................ 2040-AC56
3716 SAN No. 4344 Water Quality Standards for Indian Country Waters..................... 2040-AD46
3717 SAN No. 3702 Test Procedures for the Analysis of Trace Metals Under the Clean Water 2040-AC75
Act.................................................................................
3718 SAN No. 3714 Increased Method Flexibility for Test Procedures Approved for Clean 2040-AC92
Water Act Compliance Monitoring.....................................................
3719 SAN No. 3713 Performance-Based Measurement System (PBMS) Procedures and Guidance 2040-AC93
for Clean Water Act Test Procedures.................................................
3720 SAN No. 4049 Test Procedures for the Analysis of Co-Planar and Mono-Ortho- 2040-AD09
Substituted Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Under the Clean Water Act..............
3721 SAN No. 4378 Revisions to Method Detection and Quantification for Use Under the 2040-AD53
Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act.........................................
3722 SAN No. 4357 Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces - 2040-AD39
Phase II............................................................................
3723 SAN No. 4543 Minimizing Adverse Environmental Impact from Cooling Water Intake 2040-AD70
Structures at Existing Facilities Under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, Phase
3...................................................................................
3724 SAN No. 3663 Streamlining the General Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New 2040-AC58
Sources of Pollution................................................................
3725 SAN No. 3786 NPDES Streamlining Rule -- Round III.................................. 2040-AC84
3726 SAN No. 2804 Clean Water Act Definition of Waters of the United States............. 2040-AB74
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3727 SAN No. 4214 Test Procedures for the Analysis of E. Coli and Enterococci Under the 2040-AD34
Clean Water Act.....................................................................
3728 SAN No. 3234 Revision of NPDES Industrial Permit Application Requirements and Form 2040-AC26
2C--Wastewater Discharge Information................................................
3729 SAN No. 4581 Test Procedures for the Analysis of Mercury Under the Clean Water Act 2040-AD74
(Revisions to Method 1631)..........................................................
3730 SAN No. 4476 Pretreatment Program Reinvention Pilot Projects Under Project XL...... 2090-AA16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3731 SAN No. 4447 Drinking Water: Regulatory Determinations Regarding Contaminants on 2040-AD61
the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List.......................................
3732 SAN No. 4424 6-Year Review of Existing National Primary Drinking Water Regulations 2040-AD67
(Reg Plan Seq No. 116)............................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
[[Page 62258]]
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3733 SAN No. 4404 National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR): Methyl Tertiary 2040-AD54
Butyl Ether (MTBE) and Technical Corrections to the NSDWR...........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3734 SAN No. 2281 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Radon (Reg Plan Seq No. 2040-AA94
146)..............................................................................
3735 SAN No. 2807 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Arsenic and 2040-AB75
Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminant Monitoring (Reg Plan Seq No.
147)..............................................................................
3736 SAN No. 4147 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 1 Enhanced 2040-AD18
Surface Water Treatment Rule........................................................
3737 SAN No. 4451 Underground Injection Control Class V Phase 2 Revisions............... 2040-AD63
3738 SAN No. 4561 Minor Revisions to the Public Notification Rule and the Consumer 2040-AD77
Confidence Report Rule..............................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3739 SAN No. 4212 Use of Screening Methods for Compliance Monitoring of Drinking Water 2040-AD31
Contaminants........................................................................
3740 SAN No. 2340 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Groundwater Rule......... 2040-AA97
3741 SAN No. 3238 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Aldicarb................. 2040-AC13
3742 SAN No. 4341 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 2 Enhanced 2040-AD37
Surface Water Treatment Rule........................................................
3743 SAN No. 4342 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfectants/ 2040-AD38
Disinfection Byproducts Rule........................................................
3744 SAN No. 4369 Regulated Drinking Water Contaminant Occurrence Reporting............. 2040-AD48
3745 SAN No. 4236 Update of State Underground Injection Control Programs................ 2040-AD40
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3746 SAN No. 3176 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Sulfate.................. 2040-AC07
3747 SAN No. 4146 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Filter Backwash Recycling 2040-AD65
Rule................................................................................
3748 SAN No. 4560 Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation for Public Water 2040-AD75
Systems; Amendment to the List 2 Rule and Partial Delay of Reporting of Monitoring
Results.............................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHORE PROTECTION ACT (SPA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identification
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3749 SAN No. 2820 Shore Protection Act, Section 4103(b) Regulations..................... 2040-AB85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 62259]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
General
_______________________________________________________________________
3334. UTILIZATION OF SMALL, MINORITY AND WOMEN'S BUSINESS ENTERPRISES IN
PROCUREMENT UNDER ASSISTANCE AGREEMENTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: PL 101-507; PL 102-389; PL 101-549 sec 1001; 42 USC
9605(f); PL 100-590; EO 12432; EO 12138; EO 11625
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 33
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The regulation will codify revisions to the Agency's program
for the utilization of Small, Minority and Women's Business Enterprises
in procurements under assistance agreements (i.e., grants and
cooperative agreements awarded by EPA as well as grants and cooperative
agreements awarded by other agencies under interagency agreements with
EPA). The revisions are necessary to ensure consistency with the
Supreme Court's decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 115
S.Ct. 2097 (1995), and were identified as part of the Clinton
Administration's review of affirmative action programs. They include:
(1) placing greater emphasis on requiring assistance agreement
recipients to submit documentation supporting proposed fair share
procurement objectives for Minority Business Enterprises (MBEs) and
Women's Business Enterprises (WBEs) based on the availability of
qualified MBEs and WBEs in the relevant geographic market; (2)
authorizing or requiring recipients and their prime contractors to take
reasonable race/gender-conscious measures (e.g., bidding credits) in
the event that race/gender-neutral efforts prove inadequate to meet
fair share objectives; and (3) administering statutory MBE/WBE
objectives as a national goal, allowing smaller or larger fair share
objectives for particular grants or cooperative agreements based on the
availability standard.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Final Action 12/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4056
Agency Contact: Mark Gordon, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 1230, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8886
Fax: 202 401-1080
David Sutton, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Assurance, 1230A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4444
Fax: 202 501-0756
RIN: 2020-AA39
_______________________________________________________________________
3335. REVISION TO EPAAR 1552.211-73, LEVEL OF EFFORT
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301 Sec 205(c); 63 Stat 390 as amended
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will revise EPAAR 1552.211-73, Level of Effort, to
define more concisely the services being acquired, and to more
accurately reflect the relationship between services provided and fee
payments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is no paperwork burden associated with
this action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4191
Agency Contact: Larry Wyborski, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4369
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: wyborski.larry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA64
_______________________________________________________________________
3336. REVISIONS TO ACQUISITION REGULATION CONCERNING CONFLICT OF
INTEREST
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The purpose of this rule is to revise the Agency's conflict
of interest (COI) acquisition regulations. The specific revisions
involve more stringent requirements for submission of relevant
information from Agency contractors and potential contractors regarding
their relationships with parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries,
and sister companies. Current Agency regulations do not require the
submission of this level of information. Receipt and evaluation of this
information is critical in order for the Agency to decide whether or
not COI situations exist and how they are to be handled. This revised
rule will also codify several COI clauses that have been developed
since the issuance of the previous rule in 1994.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is a paperwork burden associated with this
action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4319
Sectors Affected: 5413 Architectural, Engineering and Related Services;
5416 Management, Scientific and Technical Consulting Services; 54162
Environmental Consulting Services; 5417 Scientific Research and
Development Services; 562 Waste Management and Remediation Services
Agency Contact: Dan Humphries, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4377
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: humphries.daniel@epa.gov
[[Page 62260]]
Cal McWhirter, Environmental Protection Agency, Administration and
Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4379
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: mcwhirter.cal@epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA67
_______________________________________________________________________
3337. INCORPORATION OF CLASS DEVIATIONS INTO EPAAR
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 40 USC 486(c)
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1537; 48 CFR 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency has approved a number of class deviations (e.g.,
changes to reporting requirements and monthly progress reports) to the
EPAAR since its promulgation in April 1994. This proposed rule would
incorporate most of the class deviations to the EPAAR.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/02
Final Action 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is a paperwork burden associated with this
action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 3580
Agency Contact: Frances Smith, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4368
Fax: 202 565-2475
Email: smith.frances@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA37
_______________________________________________________________________
3338. INCREMENTALLY FUNDING FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 40 USC 486(c)
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1532
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This proposed rule will add subpart 1532.7, Contract Funding,
to the Environmental Protection Agency's Acquisition Regulation
(EPAAR). It also will revise part 1552 of the EPAAR to include a clause
for incrementally funding fixed price contracts.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is no paperwork burden associated with
this action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 3876
Agency Contact: Dan Humphries, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4377
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: humphries.daniel@epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA50
_______________________________________________________________________
3339. IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES TO GOVERNMENTWIDE DEBARMENT AND
SUSPENSION COMMON RULE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: EO 12549; EO 12689 and FASA
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 32
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Periodically OMB amends the Governmentwide common rule for
suspension and debarment of contractors and assistance participants who
threaten the integrity of Federal programs because of criminal
misconduct or poor performance. All agencies must issue changes to
their individual codified versions to conform to the common rule.
Recently, the Interagency Suspension and Debarment Coordinating
Committee prepared recommendations for comprehensive changes to the
common rule to conform to changes made in the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) as a result of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining
Act (FASA). In addition, several other proposals to improve or change
the rule were recommended by various agencies. In December 1996, OMB
declined to implement the changes at that time due to differences with
some agencies about some changes unrelated to those occasioned by FASA.
Among other things, FASA replaced the small purchase threshold
($25,000) with the simplified acquisition amount ($100,000). That
change unintentionally exposed certain EPA programs to participation by
contractors who may have been debarred for serious misconduct already.
OMB has agreed to permit agencies to amend the coverage section of
their individual agency rules to reduce or eliminate exposure to
suspended or debarred persons.
EPA intends to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend 40 CFR
32.110 to reduce EPA exposure to such consequences.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3817
This is an assistance-related statutory requirement. There is no
paperwork burden associated with this action.
Agency Contact: Robert Meunier, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3901R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5399
Fax: 202 565-2469
RIN: 2030-AA48
_______________________________________________________________________
3340. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF NONGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IN
ANTARCTICA
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 16 USC 2401 et seq, as amended; 16 USC 2403(a); PL
104-227
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 8
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, October 2, 1998, The Interim Final
Rule effective 7/14/98 through the year 2000-2001 austral summer.
[[Page 62261]]
Abstract: The purpose of this action is to develop regulations for: (1)
the environmental impact assessment of nongovernmental activities,
including tourism, for which the United States is required to give
advance notice under paragraph 5 of Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty
and (2) coordination of the review of information regarding
environmental impact assessment received by the United States from
other parties under the Protocol on Environmental Protection. The
Office of Federal Activities (OECA/OFA) will use the decisionmaking
process of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to analyze the
environmental setting; the types of nongovernmental activities,
including tourism, to be addressed by the regulations; their potential
for impact; and the alternatives available under rulemaking for
environmental impact assessments for nongovernmental activities. An
interim final rule, 40 CFR part 8, promulgated April 30, 1997, and on
July 15, 1998 extended through the 2000-2001 austral summer, will be
replaced by a final rule. The interim final rule was effective
immediately so that the U.S. could ratify the Protocol and implement
its obligations under the Protocol as soon as it entered into force.
These rules are being developed in coordination with other Federal
agencies with specific interests in and expertise with Antarctica
including the Department of State, National Science Foundation,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Coast Guard,
Marine Mammal Commission, Department of Justice, and the Council on
Environmental Quality.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Interim Final Rule 04/30/97 62 FR 23538
Extend Effectve Date Interim
Rule 04/15/98 63 FR 18352
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Organizations
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3933
Legal Description: The Interim Final Rule, effective 7/14/98, through
the year 2000-2001 austral summer.,
Interim Final Rule-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/1997/April/Day-30/i11075.htm
Extend Effectve Date- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/1998/April/Day-15/i10007.htm
Agency Contact: Joseph Montgomery, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2252A, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 564-7157
Fax: 202 564-0070
Email: montgomery.joseph@epa.gov
Katherine Biggs, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Assurance, 2252A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7144
Fax: 202 564-0072
Email: biggs.katherine@epa.gov
RIN: 2020-AA34
_______________________________________________________________________
3341. PROPOSED REVISION TO EPA'S IMPLEMENTING NEPA REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 4321
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 6
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The proposed revision is necessary to clarify and update
EPA's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulation. The revision
would clarify Agency responsibilities for: Congressionally funded
special appropriation projects and EPA-funded grant programs. The
revision would clarify public involvement procedures and organization
responsibilities. The proposal would revise the list of actions which
are categorically excluded from analyses. The revision is also needed
to incorporate a number of Executive orders and other cross-cutting
requirements into the NEPA process.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4292
Agency Contact: Joseph Montgomery, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2252A, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 564-7157
Fax: 202 564-0070
Email: montgomery.joseph@epa.gov
Marguerite Duffy, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2252A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7148
RIN: 2020-AA42
_______________________________________________________________________
3342. REVISION OF PROCEDURAL RULES FOR HEARINGS ON
CANCELLATIONS, SUSPENSIONS, CHANGES IN CLASSIFICATIONS, AND DENIALS OF
PESTICIDE REGISTRATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a(c)to 136a(d); 7 USC 136b(d)to 136b(f); 7
USC 136d(b)to 7 USC 136d(e); 7 USC 136w(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 164 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is preparing a comprehensive revision of the Rules of
Practice governing the conduct of licensing adjudications under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The
existing Rules of Practice were originally promulgated by EPA in 1973.
In the subsequent 19 years, Congress has substantially amended FIFRA,
creating a number of additional types of licensing adjudications which
are not expressly provided for in the existing Rules of Practice. In
order to include provisions tailored to these new types of proceedings,
and to incorporate the standard practices which have evolved and the
precedents which have been established since these rules were first
promulgated, EPA intends to comprehensively revise the FIFRA Rules of
Practice.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Rules of Practice Governing
Pesticide Cancellation Hearings,
Etc. 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: No
[[Page 62262]]
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4618
Sectors Affected: 111 Crop Production; 112 Animal Production; 32532
Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Scott Garrison, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2333A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4047
Fax: 202 564-5644
Email: garrison.scott@epa.gov
Kevin Lee, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance, 2333A
Phone: 202 564-5375
Fax: 202 564-5644
Email: lee.kevin@epa.gov
RIN: 2020-AA44
_______________________________________________________________________
3343. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2005; 15 USC 2601 et seq; 21 USC 346; 33 USC
1251 et seq; 33 USC 1414; 42 USC 11001 et seq; 42 USC 300(f) et seq; 42
USC 4912; 42 USC 6901 et seq; 42 USC 7401 et seq; 42 USC 9601 et seq; 5
USC 552; 7 USC 136 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 2; 40 CFR 57; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 145;
40 CFR 233; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 270; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 281; 40 CFR 350;
40 CFR 403; 40 CFR 85; 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, August 31, 2000, Proposed rule to
eliminate the special treatment of CBI substantiations.
Abstract: EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 2, subpart B, provide
procedures for handling and disclosing information claimed as
confidential business information (CBI). Although the current
regulations have succeeded in protecting CBI, changes in Agency
workload, practice, and statutory authority have made it difficult to
handle CBI activities as expeditiously as desired. EPA is examining its
CBI regulations to determine what changes are needed to make the
regulations as efficient and effective as possible. Provision 40 CFR
2.205(c), which automatically protects CBI substantiations claimed as
confidential, is being examined individually and as part of the CBI
regulations as a whole.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM/CBI Regs Proposal to revise
EPA's CBI regulations 11/23/94 59 FR 60446
Final/CBI Substant. Final rule
to eliminate special treatment
of substantiations 12/00/01
NPRM/CBI Regs Proposal to revise
CBI regs--40 CFR Part 2, Subpart
B To Be Determined
Final Rule/CBI Regs Final rule
revising CBI regs--40 CFR Part
2, Subpart B To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3240
Fomerly listed as RIN 2020-AA21.
Agency Contact: Alan Margolis, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2822, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-9329
Fax: 202 401-4544
Email: margolis.alan@epa.gov
Rebecca Moser, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental
Information, 2822, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-6780
Fax: 202 260-8550
Email: moser.rebecca@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA02
_______________________________________________________________________
3344. PERSISTENT, BIOACCUMULATIVE, AND TOXIC (PBT) POLLUTANTS STRATEGY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed
National Action Plans under a national strategy to overcome the
remaining challenges in addressing priority PBT pollutants. These
pollutants pose risks because they are toxic, persist in ecosystems,
and accumulate in fish and up the food chain. The PBT challenges
remaining stem from the pollutants' ability to travel long distances,
to transfer rather easily among air, water, and land, and to linger for
generations. EPA is committing, through this strategy, to create an
enduring cross-office system that will address the cross-media issues
associated with priority PBT pollutants. This strategy fortifies
existing EPA commitments related to priority PBTs, such as the 1997
Canada/U.S. Binational Toxics Strategy (BNS), the North American
Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, and the recently released Clean
Water Action Plan. EPA is forging a new approach to reduce risks from
and exposures to priority PBT pollutants through increased coordination
among EPA national and regional programs. This approach also requires
the significant involvement of stakeholders, including international,
State, local, and tribal organizations, the regulated community,
environmental groups, and private citizens. EPA is carrying out this
strategy through the implementation of National Action Plans for
Priority PBT Pollutants. EPA is initially focusing action on 12 BNS
Level 1 substances either individually or as categories and two major
cross-cutting issues (monitoring and outreach/risk communication). The
action plans will use the full range of its tools to prevent and reduce
releases of these substances. These tools include international,
voluntary, regulatory, programmatic, remedial, compliance monitoring
and assistance, enforcement, research, and outreach tools. EPA will
integrate and sequence actions within and across action plans, and will
seek to leverage these actions on international and industry-sector
bases. Beyond these first 12 substances EPA will identify additional
PBTs for development of National Action Plans.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice Multimedia Strategy for
PBTs 11/17/98 63 FR 63926
Notice Draft National Action
Plan for Mercury 09/16/99 64 FR 50284
Notice Proposed National Action
Plan for Alkyl-lead 08/25/00 65 FR 51823
Notice Proposed National Action
Plan for Octachlorostyrene (OCS)08/25/00 65 FR 51825
[[Page 62263]]
Notice Draft Action Plan for
Level 1 Pesticides 11/01/00 65 FR 65314
Notice Draft Action Plan for
Hexachlorobezene (HCB) 12/08/00 65 FR 77026
Notice Draft Action Plan for
Benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P) 12/00/01
Notice Final Action Plan for
Mercury 12/00/01
Notice Final Action Plan for
Alkyl-lead 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4463
Agency Contact: Tom Murray, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7409, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1876
Fax: 202 260-0178
Email: murray.tom-hq@epa.gov
Paul Matthai, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7409, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3385
Fax: 202 260-0178
Email: matthai.paul@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD45
_______________________________________________________________________
3345. REGULATORY INCENTIVES FOR THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ACHIEVEMENT
TRACK PROGRAM
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 117 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2090-AA13
_______________________________________________________________________
3346. PROJECT XL SITE SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR NASA WHITE SANDS TEST
FACILITY ELECTRONIC REPORTING IN LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The purpose of the NASA WSTF Electronic Reporting site
specific rule is to enable the NASA White Sands Test Facility to
electronically submit compliance reports and permit information to the
New Mexico Environmental Department (NMED) in lieu of submitting paper
reports. The rule will set forth guidelines to ensure that the
information submitted by NASA WSTF to NMED is accurate by outlining
procedures for data authentication, use of electronic signature and
encryption processes.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/31/01 66 FR 55050
NPRM Comment Period End 11/30/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4536
Agency Contact: John DuPree, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
the Administrator, 1802, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-4468
Fax: 202 260-3125
Email: dupree.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA27
_______________________________________________________________________
3347. NEW JERSEY GOLD TRACK PROJECT XL RULE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Gold Track Program is a crucial part of NJDEP's efforts
to create a State-run tiered performance-based program. Currently,
facilities may join NJDEP's Silver Track Program, which is a lower-
level tier that provides recognition for commitments to a certain level
of environmental enhancement. Gold Track expands upon these
environmental commitments, and offers proportionally greater
recognition, as well as actual federal regulatory flexibility to
participating facilities. NJDEP is partnering with EPA in the Gold
Track effort under the XL program, so as to be able to offer federal
regulatory flexibility to Gold Track participants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4533
Was formerly RIN 2002-AA00.
Agency Contact: Chad Carbone, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1802, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-4296
Fax: 202 260-1812
Email: carbone.chad@epa.gov
Aleksandra Dobkowski-Joy, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
the Administrator
Phone: 212 637-3676
Email: dobkowski.aleksandra@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA28
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
General
_______________________________________________________________________
3348. EPAAR COVERAGE ON LOCAL HIRING AND TRAINING
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301 sec 205(c); 63 Stat 390 as amended
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1526; 48 CFR 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will amend the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR)
to include part 1526, Other Socioeconomic Programs, and to revise part
1552, Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses. The purpose is to
provide an incentive for prime contractors to utilize local hiring and
provide training to local hires in
[[Page 62264]]
specific geographical locations where contractual requirements will be
performed. This incentive will support economic development in areas
where EPA contracts are performed.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/09/98 63 FR 67845
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is no paperwork burden associated with
this action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4187
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-GENERAL/1998/December/Day-09/g32683.htm
Agency Contact: Frances Smith, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4368
Fax: 202 565-2475
Email: smith.frances@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA62
_______________________________________________________________________
3349. NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN,
HANDICAP, AND AGE IN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES RECEIVING FEDERAL FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 794; 42 USC 2000d to 2000d-7; 42 USC 6101 to
6107; EO 12250
CFR Citation: 28 CFR 42.101 to 42.112; 28 CFR 42.501 to 42.540; 28 CFR
42.700 to 42.736
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Department of Justice proposes to make amendments to its
regulations implementing title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(title VI), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1972 (section
504), and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Age Discrimination Act).
Together, these statutes prohibit discrimination on the basis of race,
color, national origin, disability, and age in programs or activities
that receive Federal financial assistance. In 1988, the Civil Rights
Restoration Act (CRRA) added definitions of program or activity and
program to title VI and added a definition of program or activity to
section 504 and the Age Discrimination Act. The added definitions were
designed to clarify the broad scope of coverage of recipients' programs
or activities under these statutes. The promulgation of this proposed
regulation explicitly incorporates the CRRA's definition of program or
activity and program into the Department's title VI, section 504, and
Age Discrimination Act regulations. The Department's proposed
regulation will be published as part of a joint Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking involving up to 24 Federal agencies.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/06/00 65 FR 76460
NPRM Comment Period End 01/05/01
Final Action 12/00/01
Final Action Effective 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4021
Agency Contact: Ann Goode, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 1201, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7272
RIN: 2020-AA36
_______________________________________________________________________
3350. REWRITING OF EPA REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 552
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 2
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This document proposes revisions to EPA's regulations under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The FOIA regulations have been
streamlined and written in plain English wherever possible. These
revisions reflect the principles established by President Clinton and
Attorney General Reno in their FOIA Policy Memoranda of October 4,
1993. They also reflect developments in the case law and include
updated cost figures for calculating and charging fees. In addition,
the proposed revisions include provisions implementing the Electronic
Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996. These revisions will
simplify and expedite responses to FOIA requests.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Revised Freedom of
Information Act Regulations 04/12/00 65 FR 19703
Final Action Revised Freedom of
Information Act Regulations 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4180
Fomerly listed as RIN 2020-AA40.
Agency Contact: Alan D. Margolis, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Environmental Information, 2822, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-9329
Fax: 202 401-1490
Email: margolis.alan@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA04
_______________________________________________________________________
3351. CROSS-MEDIA ELECTRONIC REPORTING (ER) AND RECORDKEEPING RULE
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 148 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2025-AA07
_______________________________________________________________________
3352. ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301 Sec 205(c); 63 Stat 390 as amended
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1532.11
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule complies with the revised Federal Acquisition
Regulations (FAR) coverage regarding implementation of the Debt
Collection Improvement Act. Because the revised FAR offers choices in
implementation, each agency must communicate with its
[[Page 62265]]
vendor community its choices. This rule will let our vendor community
know that EPA will require the use of FAR Clause 52.232-34, Payment by
Electronic Funds Transfer (Non-CCR), as prescribed in FAR
32.1105(a)(2). Within the clause, under (c) the payment office shall be
inserted as the prescribed designated office. Further inserted shall be
that the required EFT information shall be provided no later than 15
days prior to submission of the first request for payment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is no paperwork burden associated with
this action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4185
Agency Contact: Calvin McWhirter, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4379
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: mcwhirter.calvin@epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA57
_______________________________________________________________________
3353. NOTICE TO PROCEED
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the EPA
Acquisition Regulations (EPAAR) to include a clause concerning the
issuance of warrants for on-scene coordinators. The intent is to allow
program officials with remedial type requirements to receive on-scene
coordinator warrants so that they can issue letter contracts.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Interim Final Rule 03/01/01 66 FR 12897
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is no paperwork burden associated with
this action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4351
Agency Contact: Larry Wyborski, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4369
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: wyborski.larry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA68
_______________________________________________________________________
3354. ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTIONS TO EPAAR 1515, CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Administrative corrections will be made to EPAAR 1515 for
clarification purposes.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is no paperwork burden associated with
this action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4400
Agency Contact: Leigh Pomponio, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4364
Fax: 202 565-2475
Email: pomponio.leigh@epamial.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA73
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
General
_______________________________________________________________________
3355. CONSOLIDATION OF GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE STANDARDS (GLPS)
REGULATIONS CURRENTLY UNDER TSCA AND FIFRA INTO ONE RULE
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq; 7 USC 136 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 160; 40 CFR 792
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On November 29, 1983, EPA published Good Laboratory Practice
Standards (GLPS) regulations intended to help ensure data integrity for
studies required to support marketing and research permits under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). These rules were last amended on
August 17, 1989. GLPS data integrity measures can be applied to a wide
variety of scientific studies. Although the TSCA and FIFRA GLPS contain
identical provisions, they were published as separate rules to account
for statutory and program differences between TSCA and FIFRA, such as
differences in records retention requirements. EPA believes it will be
able to address the differences between TSCA and FIFRA, such as
differences in records retention requirements. EPA believes it will be
able to address the differences of those programs without duplicating
the entire GLP standard in two places.
This action is intended to consolidate EPA's GLPS into one rule.
Program-specific requirements will be addressed in either separate
sections of the consolidated rule, or in separate rules as is
determined appropriate. This action is not intended to change the
requirements, applicability, or
[[Page 62266]]
enforceability of GLPS with respect to any statute.
EPA has received comments from stakeholders regarding the
understandability of many aspects of the GLPS, and over the years has
issued numerous clarifications. EPA believes that some clarifications,
if included directly in the rule, would make the rule easier to
understand and enhance compliance. Therefore, EPA intends to include
such clarifications where appropriate in this rulemaking. Finally, in
the interest of maintaining consistency between EPA's and Food and Drug
Administration's regulations, EPA will determine any modifications that
have occurred to the FDA GLP rule and consider incorporation of such
changes into the EPA rule. This action will serve to reduce the total
regulatory text in the Code of Federal Regulations by an estimated 10
pages, by consolidating 23 pages of text to approximately 13. In the
process it will provide a generic GLP rule that may be used by other
programs in the Agency.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/22/99 64 FR 3456
NPRM 12/29/99 64 FR 72972
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 3807
Agency Contact: David Stangel, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2225A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4162
Fax: 202 564-0028
RIN: 2020-AA26
_______________________________________________________________________
3356. FELLOWSHIP GRANT REGULATION REVISION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 46
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Fellowship Rule (part 46) establishes the requirements
applicable to granting all EPA fellowships. It supplements 40 CFR part
30, ``Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements
with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit
Organizations.'' The rule requires submission of data to the Agency,
however, a new ICR is not required. The rule is already cleared under
current ICR approval.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Interim Final Rule 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4572
Agency Contact: W. Scott McMoran, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3903R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5376
Fax: 202 565-2468
Email: mcmoran.scott@epa.gov
Suzie Kocchi, Environmental Protection Agency, Administration and
Resources Management, 3903R
Phone: 202 564-5289
Fax: 202 565-2470
Email: kocchi.suzanne@epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA77
_______________________________________________________________________
3357. EMPOWERMENT THROUGH DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY AND
MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 40 USC 486(c)
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1501; 48 CFR 1502; 48 CFR 1515; 48 CFR 1517; 48
CFR 1536; 48 CFR 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action is being taken to redelegate select contracting
authorities to a lower level. This will eliminate additional reviews
and speed delivery of contracting actions to customers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 11/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is no paperwork burden associated with
this action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4589
Agency Contact: Larry Wyborski, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4369
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: wyborski.larry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA78
_______________________________________________________________________
3358. GUIDELINES FOR CARCINOGEN RISK ASSESSMENT
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Not applicable
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency will use these guidelines to evaluate suspect
carcinogens in line with the policies and procedures established in the
statutes administered by the EPA. These guidelines revise and replace
EPA Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment published at 51 FR 33992,
September 24, 1986. These guidelines provide EPA staff and decision-
makers with the directions and perspectives necessary to develop and
use risk assessments. The guidelines also provide the general public
with basic information about the Agency's approaches to risk
assessment.
To develop guidelines the Agency must find a balance between
consistency and innovation. Consistent risk assessments provide
consistent bases to support regulatory decision-making. On the other
hand, innovation is necessary so the Agency will base its decisions on
current scientific thinking. In balancing these and other science
policies, the Agency relies on input from the general scientific
community through established scientific peer review processes. The
guidelines incorporate basic principles and science policies based on
evaluation of the currently available information. The revisions place
increased emphasis on the role of carcinogenic mechanisms in risk
assessment and clearer explication of underlying assumptions in risk
assessment.
These guidelines will have minimal to no impact on small businesses or
State, local, and tribal governments.
[[Page 62267]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Reproposed Guidelines 04/23/96 61 FR 17960
Implementation Policy 06/25/96 61 FR 32799
Final Guidelines To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3671
Agency Contact: William Wood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Research and Development, 8103, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3358
RIN: 2080-AA06
_______________________________________________________________________
3359. EPA DRAFT AGENCYWIDE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency is revising its 1981
Public Participation Policy. The revised policy is being issued as the
Draft 2000 Public Involvement Policy for 120-day public comment. The
Draft Policy was updated to reflect changes over the past nineteen
years such as additional Agency responsibilities, new regulations,
expanded public involvement techniques, and the changed nature of
public access due to the Internet. The Policy will provide guidance and
direction to EPA officials on reasonable and effective means to involve
the public in its regulatory and program decisions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Draft Public Involvement Policy 12/28/00 65 FR 82335
Final Public Involvement Policy To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4530
Agency Contact: Patricia Bonner, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of the Administrator, 1807, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0599
Fax: 202 260-4903
Email: bonner.patricia@epa.gov
Lisa Kahn, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 1807
Phone: 202 260-4545
Fax: 202 260-4903
Email: kahn.lisa@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA23
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
General
_______________________________________________________________________
3360. INCORPORATING INFORMAL CLAUSES (EP) INTO THE EPAAR
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
CFR Citation: None
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 05/24/01 66 FR 28673
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Paul Schaffer
Phone: 202 564-4366
Fax: 202 565-2551
Email: schaffer.paul@epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA66
_______________________________________________________________________
3361. NEW JERSEY GOLD TRACK PROJECT XL RULE
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Transferred to RIN 2090-AA28 08/17/01
RIN: 2002-AA00
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3362. PERFORMANCE WARRANTY AND INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE TEST PROCEDURES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7541; 42 USC 7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 85
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action establishes a new short test procedure for use in
I/M programs required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Vehicles
that are tested and failed using this procedure and that meet
eligibility requirements established by the act would be eligible for
free warranty repair from the manufacturers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Final Action 11/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3263
Agency Contact: Buddy Polovick, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4928
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: polovick.buddy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE20
_______________________________________________________________________
3363. INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE RECALL REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7511(a)(2)(b); 42 USC 7511(a)(2)(b)(2)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action specifies requirements for enhanced I/M programs
to establish a program to
[[Page 62268]]
ensure compliance with recall notices. This is pursuant to the Clean
Air Act Amendments of 1990.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3262
Agency Contact: Buddy Polovick, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4928
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: polovick.buddy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE22
_______________________________________________________________________
3364. IMPLEMENTATION OF OZONE AND PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) NATIONAL
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (NAAQS) AND REGIONAL HAZE REGULATIONS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 119 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AF34
_______________________________________________________________________
3365. OPERATING PERMITS: REVISIONS (PART 70)
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 120 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AF70
_______________________________________________________________________
3366. AMENDMENTS TO METHOD 24 (WATER-BASED COATINGS)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 15, 2001.
Abstract: The determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
content of a surface coating by reference Method 24 involves
determination of its water content and calculation of its VOC content
as the difference of the two measurements (volatile content minus water
content). Method 24 is inherently less precise for water-based coatings
than it is for solvent-based coatings and the imprecision increases as
water content increases. This action will amend Method 24 by adding a
direct measurement procedure for measuring VOC content of water-based
coatings. This amendment will improve the precision of Method 24 for
water-based coatings.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/02
Final Action 03/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3649
Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-1064
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: sorrell.candace@epa.gov
Bill Lamason, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
19, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5374
RIN: 2060-AF72
_______________________________________________________________________
3367. NESHAP: PLYWOOD AND COMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 121 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AG52
_______________________________________________________________________
3368. NESHAP: MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This project is to develop national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (HAP) by establishing maximum achievable
control technology (MACT) for municipal solid waste landfills.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/07/00 65 FR 66672
Supplemental NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3969
Sectors Affected: 562212 Solid Waste Landfill
Agency Contact: Michele Laur, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5256
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: laur.michele@epa.gov
Kent C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH13
_______________________________________________________________________
3369. TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY RULE AMENDMENT: CLARIFICATION OF TRADING
PROVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671 CAA sec 176(c)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 93
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The transportation conformity rule, promulgated in November
1993, ensures that transportation and air quality planning are
consistent with Clean Air Act air quality standards. The Open Market
Trading Guidance provides guidance to states for establishing a method
to quantify emissions reductions (called discrete emissions reductions
or DERs) that can be traded among parties and how such trading should
occur. This action will amend the transportation conformity rule to
clarify how emissions trading could be reconciled in the conformity
process.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3917
Agency Contact: Laura Voss, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
[[Page 62269]]
and Radiation, NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4858
Fax: 734 214-4531
Email: voss.laura@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH31
_______________________________________________________________________
3370. STREAMLINED EVAPORATIVE TEST PROCEDURES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521(m)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will streamline the test procedure used to
establish compliance with evaporative emission requirements for light
duty vehicles and trucks. The current test procedure requires both two
and three day diurnal emission tests, as well as running-loss testing.
The revisions will delete the three day requirement and add
flexibilities for running-loss compliance. This will enable
manufacturers to save significant resources without any decrease in
environmental benefits.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3910
Agency Contact: David Goodi, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4480
RIN: 2060-AH34
_______________________________________________________________________
3371. RULEMAKING TO MODIFY THE LIST OF SOURCE CATEGORIES FROM WHICH
FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE CONSIDERED IN MAJOR SOURCE DETERMINATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7602 CAA sec 302(j)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking will modify the list of source categories for
which fugitive emissions are to be considered in major source
determinations under the New Source Review (Prevention of Significant
Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review) and title V
programs. As provided by section 302(j) of the Act, EPA adopted rules
on August 7, 1980 that require, for specific source categories, the
inclusion of fugitive emissions when determining if a stationary source
is a major source. In its 1980 rulemaking, EPA identified one such
specific source category as those stationary source categories being
regulated, as of August 7, 1980, under section 111 or 112 of the Clean
Air Act. Moreover, EPA indicated that at the time of any future
rulemaking proposing to regulate additional categories of sources under
section 111 or 112, the EPA would conduct a parallel rulemaking under
section 302(j) to determine whether fugitive emissions from sources
within these source categories needed to be considered in determining
whether the sources were major stationary sources. EPA did not conduct
these parallel rulemakings as intended and is now conducting a
rulemaking pursuant to section 302(j) to address the source categories
which became subject to section 111 and 112 standards after August 7,
1980.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/02
Final Action 06/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4045
Agency Contact: Joanna Swanson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5282
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: swanson.joanna@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH58
_______________________________________________________________________
3372. NESHAP: FUMED SILICA PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAAA Section 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Fumed silica is produced at four facilities is three states.
There is no NSPS for the source category. Based on preliminary results
of a screening study, the source category emits chlorine, HCl, and
chlorinated organics.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 4111
This action merged with SAN 4104, RIN 2060-AH75.
Sectors Affected: 325188 All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bill Maxwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5430
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: maxwell.bill@epa.gov
Bob Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH72
_______________________________________________________________________
3373. NESHAP: HYDROCHLORIC ACID PRODUCTION INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 1857 et seq; 44 USC 350 et seq; 5 USC 605; EO
12291; EO 12866
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 requires
the EPA to develop emission standards for each
[[Page 62270]]
major source category of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The standards
are to be technology-based and are to require the maximum degree of
emission reduction determined to be achievable by the Administrator of
the EPA. The EPA has determined that some hydrochloric acid plants may
be major sources for one or more HAPs. As a consequence, a regulation
(emission standards) will be developed for the hydrochloric acid
production industry.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4104
Sectors Affected: 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing;
325199 All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing; 325181 Alkalies
and Chlorine Manufacturing; 325188 All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bill Maxwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5430
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: maxwell.bill@epa.gov
Bob Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH75
_______________________________________________________________________
3374. NESHAP: ASPHALT/COAL TAR APPLICATION ON METAL PIPES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: The Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended in 1990, requires the EPA
to (1) publish an initial list of all categories of major and area
sources of the hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) listed in section 112(b)
of the CAA, (2) promulgate a schedule establishing a date for the
promulgation of emission standards for each of the listed categories of
HAPs emission sources, and (3) develop emission standards for each
source of HAPs. These standards are to be technology-based and are to
require the maximum degree of emission reduction determined to be
achievable by the Administrator. The Agency has determined that the
application of asphalt or coal tar to metal pipes may reasonably be
anticipated to emit several of the 189 HAPs listed in section 112(b) of
the CAA. As a consequence, a regulatory development program is being
pursued for the asphalt/coal tar application on metal pipes industry to
promulgate emission standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4107
This action will be covered under Misc. Metal Parts & Products, SAN
3825, RIN 2060-AG56
Sectors Affected: 332812 Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and
Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers
Agency Contact: Bruce Moore, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5460
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: moore.bruce@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH78
_______________________________________________________________________
3375. NESHAP: CLAY MINERALS PROCESSING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: The Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended in 1990, requires the EPA
to (1) publish an initial list of all categories of major and area
sources of the hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) listed in section 112(b)
of the CAA, (2) promulgate a schedule establishing a date for the
promulgation of emission standards for each of the listed categories of
HAPs emission sources, and (3) develop emission standards for each
source of HAPs. These standards are to be technology-based and are to
require the maximum degree of emission reduction determined to be
achievable by the Administrator. The Agency has determined that the
clay products manufacturing industry may reasonably be anticipated to
emit several of the 189 HAPs listed in section 112(b) of the CAA. As a
consequence, a regulatory development program is being pursued for the
clay products manufacturing industry to promulgate emission standards.
EPA plans to propose four separate standards for the clay products
manufacturing industry (see 64 FR 63028, 11/18/99). This action will
propose and promulgate standards for the clay minerals processing
portion of the industry.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4113
This source category will be addressed in SAN 4325, RIN 2060-AI67.
Sectors Affected: 327121 Brick and Structural Clay Tile Manufacturing;
327122 Ceramic Wall and Floor Tile Manufacturing; 327123 Other
Structural Clay Product Manufacturing; 327124 Clay Refractory
Manufacturing; 212324 Kaolin and Ball Clay Mining; 327992 Ground or
Treated Mineral and Earth Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Steve Shedd, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5397
[[Page 62271]]
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: shedd.steve@epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH79
_______________________________________________________________________
3376. NESHAP: URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This project will develop national emissions standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) by establishing emissions limitations
for hazardous air pollutants (HAP) which can be emitted by the two
known sources in this category. The emissions limitations are to be
based upon the application of the maximum achievable control technology
(MACT). The purpose of the NESHAP is to reduce emissions of HAP to
protect public health and the environment. The project will begin in
2000. Initially, information on the industry processes and emissions of
HAP will be analyzed to identify available emissions control
technologies. That work will be followed by the development, proposal
and promulgation of NESHAP.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Delisted 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4098
This source category will be delisted.
Sectors Affected: 331419 Primary Smelting and Refining of Nonferrous
Metal (except Copper and Aluminum)
Agency Contact: Jeff Telander, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5427
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: telander.jeff@epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH83
_______________________________________________________________________
3377. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION 16 - SPECIFICATIONS AND TEST PROCEDURES
FOR PREDICTIVE EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS IN STATIONARY SOURCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 CAA sec 111
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, April 15, 2001.
Abstract: Performance Specification 16 is being proposed to provide
performance criteria for predictive emission monitoring systems.
Predictive systems represent a new technology that uses process
information or parameters to predict pollutant emissions instead of
directly measuring them. The Agency is allowing their use in recently-
promulgated rules and they are being considered by a number of
regulated facilities. The specification lists the requirements for
acceptable systems that are met by passing tests that compare the
monitoring system with standardized methods and audit gases to
determine system accuracy and stability. Performance Specification 16
will primarily apply to facilities whose emissions can be predicted
from process parameters such as combustion processes (including gas
turbines and internal combustion engines).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4119
Sectors Affected: 33241 Power Boiler and Heat Exchanger Manufacturing;
333611 Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Unit Manufacturing; 333618
Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing; 336399 All Other Motor Vehicle
Parts Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Foston Curtis, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-1063
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: curtis.foston@epa.gov
William H. Lamason, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5374
RIN: 2060-AH84
_______________________________________________________________________
3378. TECHNICAL CHANGE TO DOSE METHODOLOGY FOR 40 CFR 191, SUBPART A
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 2021 Atomic Energy Act of 1954; Reorganization
Plan No. 3 of 1970; Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 190(B); 40 CFR 191(A)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The purpose of this action is to make a technical change to
the dose methodology used in subpart A of 40 CFR 191, entitled
Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for the Management and
Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Waste and Transuranic Waste
The current methodology is outdated. The dose methodology used in the
rule published on September 19, 1985, was based on the target organ
approach recommended by the International Commission on Radiological
Protection (ICRP) in Report No. 2. Since that time science has
progressed and a new methodology based on an effective dose equivalent
approach is currently being recommended by the ICRP in Report No. 26.
This action would update the 40 CFR 191, subpart A dose limits
published in 1985 from the target organ to the state-of-the-art
effective dose equivalent system. There would be no change in the level
of protection, just the scientific methodology for determining
compliance with the levels of protection established in 1985.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 06/00/02
[[Page 62272]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4003
Agency Contact: Ray Clark, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9198
Fax: 202 565-2065
Email: clark.ray@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH90
_______________________________________________________________________
3379. RULEMAKING ON SECTION 126 PETITIONS FROM NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT
REGARDING SOURCES IN MICHIGAN
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7426
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 75; 40 CFR 97
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The EPA is proposing to revise the section 126 rule in light
of the March 3, 2000 Court decision (Michigan v. EPA, No. 98-1497) on
the NOx SIP Call. The court vacated, and remanded to EPA for further
consideration, the inclusion of Georgia and Missouri in the NOx SIP
Call in light of the Ozone Transport Assessment Group conclusions that
emissions from coarse grid portions of States did not merit controls.
The reasoning of the Court regarding the significance of NOx emissions
from sources in Georgia and Missouri calls into question the inclusion
of the coarse grid portion of Michigan in the NOx SIP Call. In a
separate proposal on the NOx SIP Call, EPA is proposing to withdraw the
NOx SIP Call requirements for the Michigan coarse grid area. The
section 126 rule is based on many of the same analyses and information
used for the NOx SIP call and covers part of Michigan. Thus, in light
of the court ruling, EPA is proposing to withdraw its section 126
findings and control requirements under the 1-hour ozone standard with
respect to sources located in the small part of the coarse grid portion
of Michigan that is currently covered by the section 126 rule. The EPA
has not identified any existing section 126 sources that would be
affected by the proposal, however this proposal would eliminate
findings and control requirements for new sources locating in the
coarse grid. This proposal does not create any new requirements, thus
there are no associated costs. The proposal does not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. It is consistent with the Court ruling on the
NOx SIP Call and EPA's new proposed action on the NOx SIP Call.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4464
Split from RIN 2060-AH88.
Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation
Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epa.gov
Tom Helms, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-15,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5527
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: helms.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ36
_______________________________________________________________________
3380. WITHDRAWAL OF AMENDMENTS FOR TESTING AND MONITORING
PROVISIONS TO PARTS 60, 61, AND 63
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401; 42 USC 7410 to 7412; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC
7416
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 61; 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking will amend the emission test methods and
performance specifications in appendices A and B of part 60, appendix B
of part 61, and appendix A of part 63 by revising the method format to
conform with Environmental Monitoring Management Council (EMMC)
guidelines. Conformance to the guidelines will promote consistency
among inter-program methods. In addition, minor technical and printing
errors in the methods will be corrected. Similar errors in various
subparts of part 60 will also be corrected. Performance specification
15 is also being proposed in this rulemaking.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4580
Split from RIN 2060-AG21.
Agency Contact: Foston Curtis, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-1063
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: curtis.foston@epa.gov
Bill Lamason, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
19, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5374
RIN: 2060-AJ85
_______________________________________________________________________
3381. NAAQS: SULFUR DIOXIDE (RESPONSE TO REMAND)
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 118 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AA61
_______________________________________________________________________
3382. NESHAP: RECIPROCATING INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 122 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AG63
_______________________________________________________________________
3383. NESHAP: COMBUSTION TURBINE
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 123 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AG67
_______________________________________________________________________
3384. NESHAP: IRON FOUNDRIES AND STEEL FOUNDRIES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
[[Page 62273]]
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000, See additional
information.
Abstract: Iron foundries and steel foundries have been identified by
the EPA as potentially significant sources of air emissions of
manganese compounds, lead compounds, and other substances that are
among the pollutants listed as hazardous air pollutants in section 112
of the Clean Air Act, as amended in November of 1990. As such, these
industries may be source categories for which national emission
standards may be warranted.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3343
EPA is required to promulgate standards for all of the source
categories listed in accordance with section 112(e) by November 15,
2000.
Agency Contact: Jim Maysilles, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3265
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: maysilles.jim@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE43
_______________________________________________________________________
3385. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS:
MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING AND MISCELLANEOUS COATING
MANUFACTURING
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAAA sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This regulation will cover organic chemical manufacturing
processes not covered by the HON or other MACT standards. The
regulation will control process vents (continuous and batch, including
mixing operations), equipment leaks, storage tanks, wastewater, solvent
recovery, and heat exchange systems.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3452
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5402
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE82
_______________________________________________________________________
3386. NESHAP: CHLORINE PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAAA sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: The chlorine production source category includes facilities
engaged in the production of chlorine and sodium hydroxide (caustic) by
one of the following electrolytic processes: diaphragm cell, membrane
cell, and mercury cell. Hazardous air pollutants emitted include
chlorine, hydrogen chloride, and mercury. None of the facilities are
major sources on their own. However, several are co-located with major
sources (e.g., pulp and paper plants, polymer plants, synthetic organic
chemical plants, etc.). Emissions of chlorine and hydrogen chloride are
very minor and the Agency is evaluating whether regulation of these
HAPs is warranted. Relative to mercury, which is among five pollutants
listed for regulation under section 112(c)(6) due to their persistent
and bioaccumulative effects, the Agency intends to subject to
regulation under section 112(d)(2) all mercury cell facilities
regardless of major source status.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3449
Agency Contact: Iliam Rosario, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5308
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: rosario.iliam@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE85
_______________________________________________________________________
3387. NESHAP: MISCELLANEOUS METAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS (SURFACE COATING)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: This regulation will control emissions of hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) from operations that apply surface coatings to metal
parts and products. Although this rule would cover a wide variety of
coating operations, it would not apply to specific coating operations
for which regulations have been developed (e.g., plastic parts coating,
can coating, large appliance coating, etc.). This regulation is
required under section 112 of the Clean Air Act of 1990.
[[Page 62274]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3825
Agency Contact: Bruce Moore, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5460
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: moore.bruce@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG56
_______________________________________________________________________
3388. NESHAP: ASPHALT PROCESSING AND ASPHALT ROOFING MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAAA sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: The CAA required EPA to publish an initial list of all
categories of major and area sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs)
listed in section 112(b) of the CAA and to establish and meet dates for
promulgation of emissions standards for each of the listed categories
of HAP emissions sources. The standards are to be technology-based and
are to require the maximum degree of reduction determined to be
achievable by the Administrator. The EPA has determined that the
asphalt roofing and processing industry may be reasonably anticipated
to emit one or more of the pollutants listed in section 112(b) of the
CAA. As a consequence, the source category is included on the initial
list of HAP-emitting categories scheduled for standards promulgation
within ten years of enactment of the CAA Amendments of 1990. The
purpose of this action is to pursue a regulatory development program
such that emission standards may be proposed and promulgated according
to the mandated schedule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Interim Final 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3655
Sectors Affected: 324122 Asphalt Shingle and Coating Materials
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Rick Colyer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5262
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: colyer.rick@epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG66
_______________________________________________________________________
3389. NESHAP: REFRACTORY PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: The proposed rulemaking will apply to existing and new
refractory products manufacturing facilities. There are approximately 8
existing refractory products manufacturing facilities in the United
States located at major source facilities. It is estimated that no new
refractory products manufacturing facilities will be built at least for
the next 3 years. The HAP that will be reduced by this proposed rule
are polycyclic organic matter (POM), phenol, formaldehyde, methanol,
and ethylene glycol. Implementation of the proposed rule would reduce
emissions of air toxics by approximately 132 tons per year, a reduction
of 46 percent from current levels. No significant adverse economic
impact is expected to occur as a result of implementing this proposed
rulemaking. The capital cost associated with the proposed rulemaking is
approximately $3.5 million. The total annual cost of the proposed
rulemaking is approximately $1.7 million.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3652
Agency Contact: Susan Zapata, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5167
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: zapata.susan@epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG68
_______________________________________________________________________
3390. NESHAP: INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BOILERS AND
PROCESS HEATERS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 124 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AG69
_______________________________________________________________________
3391. NESHAP: LIME MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq; 44 USC 350 et seq; 5 USC 605
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: Section 112 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 requires
the EPA to develop emission standards for each major source category of
hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The standards are to be technology-
based and are to require the maximum degree
[[Page 62275]]
of emission reduction determined to be achievable by the Administrator
of the EPA. The EPA has determined that some lime manufacturing plants
may be major sources for one or more HAPs. As a consequence, a
regulation (emission standards) is being developed for the lime
manufacturing industry.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3651
Sectors Affected: 32741 Lime Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Joseph Wood, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5446
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: wood.joe@epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG72
_______________________________________________________________________
3392. NESHAP: SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 BBBBB
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This rule will establish a MACT (maximum available control
technology) for semiconductor production facilities. There is currently
one major source that would be affected by the NESHAP. This action will
result in little or no additional emission reduction but will establish
a Federal MACT level for large facilities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3902
Sectors Affected: 334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing
Agency Contact: John Schaefer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0296
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: schaefer.john@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG93
_______________________________________________________________________
3393. NESHAP: METAL CAN (SURFACE COATING) INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This action will result in the reduction of hazardous air
pollutants emitted by the metal can industry. The Agency will study
what pollutants are emitted and evaluate the control techniques,
including pollution prevention, that are used to reduce these
emissions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3906
Sectors Affected: 332431 Metal Can Manufacturing; 332812 Metal Coating,
Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to
Manufacturers; 332115 Crown and Closure Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Paul A. Almodovar, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0283
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: almodovar.paul@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG96
_______________________________________________________________________
3394. NESHAP: FABRIC PRINTING, COATING AND DYEING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: This action will result in the reduction of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) emitted from fabric printing, coating, and dyeing. The
Agency will identify and study the types and sources of HAP emissions
from these processes, and evaluate pollution prevention and other
control techniques which can reduce these emissions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3909
Sectors Affected: 3133 Textile and Fabric Finishing and Fabric Coating
Mills; 3132 Fabric Mills; 3141 Textile Furnishings Mills; 3399 Other
Miscellaneous Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Vinson Hellwig, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2317
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: hellwig.vinson@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
[[Page 62276]]
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG98
_______________________________________________________________________
3395. NESHAP: SURFACE COATING OF AUTOMOBILES AND LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 125 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AG99
_______________________________________________________________________
3396. NESHAP: PRIMARY MAGNESIUM REFINING
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (Act), as amended November
1990, requires the EPA to regulate categories of major and area sources
of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) listed in section 112(b). The EPA
has determined that sources that manufacture primary magnesium may
reasonably be anticipated to emit several of the 189 HAPs listed
(including chlorine and hydrochloric acid) in quantities sufficient to
designate them as a major source. As a consequence, primary magnesium
refining is among the HAP emitting source categories selected for
regulation and is in the group of categories for which final rules are
scheduled to be promulgated by November 15, 2000 (58 FR 63941, December
3, 1993).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3924
Agency Contact: Iliam Rosario, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5308
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: rosario.iliam@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH03
_______________________________________________________________________
3397. NESHAP: CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AMENDMENT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Final standards under section 112(d) for chromium emissions
from hard and decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing
tanks (40 CFR 63, subpart N) were promulgated on January 25, 1995.
Since promulgation, the Agency has determined that a class of chromium
electroplating operations were inadvertently excluded from regulation.
Specifically, the final standards do not apply to sources engaged in
continuous chromium electroplating of steel sheet used to make cans and
other containers. It is the Agency's intent to regulate all facilities
engaged in chromium electroplating. Therefore, the Agency plans to
amend the chromium electroplating rule to extend its applicability to
continuous chromium electroplating operations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/02
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 2841
Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5289
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: mulrine.phil@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH08
_______________________________________________________________________
3398. NESHAP: SITE REMEDIATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq; PL 101-549 104 Stat. 2399
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This rule will specify maximum achievable control technology
for site remediation. Hazardous air pollutant emissions from treatment
of contaminated soils and groundwater, and other operations will be
considered in developing the rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 3968
Agency Contact: Greg Nizich, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3078
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: nizich.greg@epa.gov
Martha Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH12
_______________________________________________________________________
3399. NESHAP: ROCKET ENGINE TEST FIRING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: As required by section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act, the
Environmental Protection Agency has developed a list of categories of
sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP's). The HAP's are
[[Page 62277]]
listed in section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act. The Rocket Engine Test
Firing source category and the Engine Test Facilities source category
are included on EPA's list of sources of HAP's. The Rocket Engine Test
Firing source category includes facilities engaged in test firing of
rocket engines using solid or liquid propellants. The Engine Test
Facilities source category includes any facility engaged in the testing
of stationary or mobile engines, including turbines and reciprocating
engines.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is a
statutory requirement. There is a paperwork burden associated with this
action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 3972
This source category is now covered under the Engine Test Cells/Stands,
SAN 4144, RIN 2060-AI74.
Agency Contact: Jaime Pagan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5340
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: pagan.jaime@epa.gov
Robert J. Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH35
_______________________________________________________________________
3400. NESHAP: ORGANIC LIQUIDS DISTRIBUTION (NON-GASOLINE)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This project is to develop national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants by establishing maximum achievable control
technology (MACT) for facilities distributing organic liquids. MACT
standards are under development to reduce the release of hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) from all industries to protect the public health and
environment. This project should include but is not limited to those
activities associated with the storage and distribution of organic
liquids other than gasoline at sites that serve as distribution points
from which organic liquids may be obtained for further use and
processing.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3971
Agency Contact: Martha Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epa.gov
Kent C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH41
_______________________________________________________________________
3401. NESHAP: GROUP I POLYMERS AND RESINS AND GROUP IV POLYMERS AND
RESINS-AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.480 to 63.506 (Revision); 40 CFR 63.1310 to
63.1335 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: During the development of the National Emission Standard for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for elastomers (Group I polymers and
resins) and thermoplastics (Group IV polymers and resins) (RINs 2060-
AD56 and 2060-AE37), many of the provisions contained in the Hazardous
Organic NESHAP (HON) were referenced directly by these polymers and
resins regulations due to similarities in processes, emission
characteristics, and control technologies. On January 17, 1997, the EPA
promulgated changes to the HON to remove ambiguity, to clearly convey
EPA intent, and to make the rule easier to understand and implement in
response to industry petitions. It is necessary to make parallel
changes to the polymers and resins NESHAP; otherwise inconsistencies
will exist for NESHAPs regulating similar source categories. An ANPRM
was published in the Federal Register on 11/25/96 (61 FR 59849), to
explain the nature of changes planned. Subsequently, six litigants have
petitioned for review of the elastomers and thermoplastics regulations.
Four companies have petitioned EPA to reconsider specific provisions in
the thermoplastics regulation. Revisions will be proposed to parallel
HON changes and to resolve petitioners' issues. There are no impacts
anticipated for small businesses or State/local/tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM Petitions for Jud. Rev-
Dow,UCC,Exxon) 11/25/96 61 FR 59849
NPRM Petitions for Judicial
Review-Prop. Amend. 03/09/99 64 FR 11559
DirectFinal Action Petition for
Reconsid.-Equip Leaks 06/08/99 64 FR 30406
NPRM Petition for Recons. -
Equip. Leaks 06/08/99 64 FR 30453
NPRM Petition for Recons. -
Equip. Leaks 06/08/99 64 FR 60456
Final Action Petitions for
Judicial Rev-Amendments 06/19/00 65 FR 38030
Direct Final Rule Stay 08/29/00 65 FR 52319
Direct Final Rule Withdrawal -
Polymers and Resins 10/26/00 65 FR 64161
Final Rule Amend. Petition for
Recons.-Cooling Towers 02/23/01 66 FR 11233
Final Rule Amend. Petition for
Jud. Review-Tech. Corr. 07/16/01 66 FR 36924
Final-Amend. & Denial Petition
for Reconsideration-Equip. Leaks08/06/01 66 FR 40903
NPRM Petition for
Reconsideration-Cooling Towers 01/00/02
[[Page 62278]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3939
Sectors Affected: 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bob Rosensteel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5608
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: rosensteel.bob@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH47
_______________________________________________________________________
3402. AMENDMENTS TO PARTS 51, 52, 63, 70 AND 71 REGARDING THE PROVISIONS
FOR DETERMINING POTENTIAL TO EMIT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action proposes to amend regulations already established
to implement the new Federal air toxics program under section 112,
including the General Provisions, the Federal operating permit program
under title V, and the major source preconstruction programs under
parts C and D of title I.
The proposed rule will address issues related to the determination of a
stationary source's potential to emit in response to three court
decisions.
This action resulted from splitting of RINs 2060-AC98 and 2060-AC63.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/02
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3479
Agency Contact: Carol Holmes, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, OECA (2242A), Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8709
Lynn Hutchinson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5795
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hutchinson.lynn@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI01
_______________________________________________________________________
3403. NESHAP: PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS (POTW)-
AMENDMENTS II
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412(e)(5) CAAA sec 112(e)(5); 42 USC
7412(n)(3) CAAA sec 112(n)(3)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will amend the existing rule to implement a
settlement agreement with the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers
of America regarding their petition for judicial review.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 10/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 4546
Split from RIN 2060-AF26.
Agency Contact: Bob Lucas, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-0884
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: lucas.bob@epa.gov
Kent C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ66
_______________________________________________________________________
3404. METAL FURNITURE (SURFACE COATING) NESHAP
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This regulation will apply to surface coating of metal
furniture products and parts. This regulation will reduce nationwide
emissions of HAPs from surface coating of metal furniture products and
parts, which is required under section 112 of the Clean Air Act.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3824
Sectors Affected: 332612 Wire Spring Manufacturing; 337215 Showcase,
Partition, Shelving, and Locker Manufacturing; 337124 Metal Household
Furniture Manufacturing; 33636 Motor Vehicle Fabric Accessories and
Seat Manufacturing; 337215 Showcase, Partition, Shelving, and Locker
Manufacturing; 337127 Institutional Furniture Manufacturing; 332116
Metal Stamping
Agency Contact: Mohamed Serageldin, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2379
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: serageldin.mohamed@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG55
_______________________________________________________________________
3405. PLASTIC PARTS AND PRODUCTS (SURFACE COATING) NESHAP
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
[[Page 62279]]
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This action would address the hazardous air pollutants (HAP)
emissions from the coating of plastic parts. Pollution prevention
approaches will be considered.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3826
Sectors Affected: 337214 Nonwood Office Furniture Manufacturing; 32614
Polystyrene Foam Product Manufacturing; 32615 Urethane and Other Foam
Product (except Polystyrene) Manufacturing; 326199 All Other Plastics
Product Manufacturing; 333313 Office Machinery Manufacturing; 33422
Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment
Manufacturing; 336399 All Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing;
336999 All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 339111
Laboratory Apparatus and Furniture Manufacturing; 339112 Surgical and
Medical Instrument Manufacturing; 33992 Sporting and Athletic Goods
Manufacturing; 33995 Sign Manufacturing; 339999 All Other Miscellaneous
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Kim Teal, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5580
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: teal.kim@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG57
_______________________________________________________________________
3406. NESHAP: WOOD BUILDING PRODUCTS (SURFACE COATING)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This action will result in the reduction of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) emitted by the wood building product surface coating
industry. The Agency will study the various HAP emitted by the industry
and evaluate pollution prevention and control techniques which can
reduce these emissions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3904
Sectors Affected: 321212 Softwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing;
321219 Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing; 321911 Wood Window and
Door Manufacturing; 321918 Other Millwork (including Flooring ); 321999
All Other Miscellaneous Wood Product Manufacturing; 321211 Hardwood
Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing; 32199 All Other Wood Product
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Luis Lluberas, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2659
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: lluberas.luis@epa.gov
Paul Almodovar, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0283
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: almodovar.paul@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH02
_______________________________________________________________________
3407. LOCATION OF SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AUDITS OF FOREIGN MANUFACTURED
VEHICLES AND ENGINES; AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7525 CAA sec 206(b)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86G (Revision); 40 CFR 86K (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would consider an amendment to the existing
regulations to include ports of entry as a location for EPA selection
of foreign produced vehicles and engines for SEA emissions testing at
laboratories in the U.S. While the regulations do not specify EPA
authority to conduct such port selections, the increased flexibility
provided by port selections warrants amending the regulations.
Presently, EPA must travel overseas to conduct SEA audits of foreign
manufactured vehicles and engines, even though most manufacturers now
have access to laboratory facilities in the U.S. The benefits include a
reduction in Agency cost since fewer overseas trips would be necessary.
Also, EPA would be able to conduct more audits of foreign manufactured
vehicles and engines.
Separate from the provisions proposed in this NPRM for amendments to
allow port selection for SEAs, EPA is also proposing to make two other
amendments to 40 CFR part 86. The first would amend current Selective
Enforcement Auditing regulations to change the minimum annual limit of
Selective Enforcement Audits per manufacturer to two (2) per year.
Currently, the minimum annual limit is one audit per manufacturer.
Under the proposed amendments EPA would be able to perform a second
audit on those manufacturers that might otherwise be limited to one
audit.
The second additional proposed amendment to part 86 would delete from
subparts A and E references to the Agency representation in certain
types of administrative hearings. The two provisions state that the
Office of General Counsel will represent the Agency in administrative
procedures governing hearings on certification for light-duty vehicles,
light-duty trucks, heavy-duty engines and motorcycles. The Agency is
proposing to delete these two provisions in order to be consistent with
other hearing procedures in part 86.
[[Page 62280]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3139
Agency Contact: Richard Gezelle, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6403J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9267
RIN: 2060-AD90
_______________________________________________________________________
3408. REVIEW OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR EMISSIONS FROM MOTOR
VEHICLES; TEST PROCEDURE ADJUSTMENTS TO FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSION TEST
RESULTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: PL 101-549
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 600; 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action considers potential adjustments to fuel economy
and emission test results to compensate for test procedure changes
previously adopted; it applies to light-duty vehicles and light-duty
trucks. This aspect of the previous rulemaking (SAN 3323, RIN 2060-
AE27) was deferred.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 07/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3979
Agency Contact: R. W. Nash, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, AAVRAG, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 743 214-4412
RIN: 2060-AH38
_______________________________________________________________________
3409. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: RECONSIDERATION OF SECTION 608
SALES RESTRICTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671(g) CAA sec 608
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 subpart F
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The rule will include the reconsideration of the sales
restriction as it relates to split systems. The Agency was petitioned
to reconsider the part of the sales restriction that included the sale
of pre-charged split systems. It restricted such sales to certified
technicians. Since then, EPA stayed that portion of the sales
restriction in response to the petition. This rule will include the
determination of the Agency related to the reconsideration. It
addresses environmental problems of ozone depletion resulting from
emissions of chlorofluorocarbons, hydrochlorofluorocarbons, and other
ozone-depleting substances. Through restricting sales of certain pre-
charged items to persons certified as technicians, emissions to the
atmosphere are decreased. The impact on small businesses and
governments would be negligible, since persons can become certified if
the EPA determination is a full restriction. Most businesses and
governments will have at least one certified technician on board. This
action has no impact on small business and State, local, and tribal
governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/02
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3673
Agency Contact: Vera Au, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2216
Fax: 202 565-2156
Email: au.vera@epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9185
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: land.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG20
_______________________________________________________________________
3410. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (FIP) FOR THE BILLINGS/LAUREL, MONTANA
SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) AREA
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 12 USC 1701 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The State of Montana submitted a sulfur dioxide (SO2) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Billings/Laurel, Montana area. On 7/
28/99 we proposed to partially approve, conditionally approve and
partially disapprove Montana's SO2 SIP for Billings/Laurel. EPA intends
to propose a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to cover those parts of
the State's plan we disapprove. EPA's FIP will assure that the
Billings/Laurel area will attain and maintain the SO2 NAAQS.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4542
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries
Agency Contact: Laurie Ostrand, Environmental Protection Agency,
Regional Office Denver, 8P-AR, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 303 312-6437
Fax: 303 312-6064
Email: ostrand.laurie@epa.gov
Larry Svoboda, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office Denver,
8P-AR
Phone: 303 312-6004
Fax: 303 312-6064
Email: svoboda.larry@epa.gov
RIN: 2008-AA00
[[Page 62281]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3411. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR INDIAN RESERVATIONS IN IDAHO,
OREGON AND WASHINGTON
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 49.121 to 49.139; 40 CFR 49.9861 to 49.17810
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) proposes basic air
rules to apply on Indian Reservations in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
The rules provide some basic air quality protection similar to what the
state implementation plans (SIPs) require for Idaho, Oregon, and
Washington. These rules are needed to establish a level playing field
and create basic federally enforceable rules under the Clean Air Act.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4487
EPA Region 10 would be responsible for implementing and enforcing these
proposed rules. Tribes can choose to assist EPA or take over
responsibility for their reservations, and EPA would provide funding to
tribes through grants to support their efforts.
Agency Contact: Regina Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency,
Regional Office Seattle, OAQ-107, 1200 6th Avenue; Seattle, Washington
98101
Phone: 206 553-1498
Fax: 206 553-0110
Email: hompson.regina@epa.gov
Bonnie Thie, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office Seattle,
OAQ-107
Phone: 206 553-1189
Fax: 206 553-0110
Email: thie.bonnie@epa.gov
RIN: 2012-AA01
_______________________________________________________________________
3412. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS: RISK MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT, SECTION 112(R)(7); THIRD PARTY AUDIT
PROVISIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7412(r); 7601 (a)(1)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action establishes requirements, incentives, and
procedures for third party audits of Risk Management Plans (RMPs) under
40 CFR part 68 that would reduce the need for, and thus the incidence
of, government audits of RMPs submitted by facilities that volunteer
for such an audit. In this context, a third party is someone not
employed by either an RMP-regulated facility or a government agency
responsible for implementing the RMP program (implementing agency).
In the preamble to the final Risk Management Program rule, EPA endorsed
the concept of using third parties to assist in rule compliance and
oversight (61 FR 31705), provided that any such proposal: not weaken
the compliance responsibilities of facility owner/operators; offer cost
savings and benefits to the industry, community, and implementing
agencies that significantly exceed the cost of implementing the
approach lead to a net increase in process safety, particularly for
smaller, less technically sophisticated facilities; and promote cost-
effective agency prioritization of oversight resources. However, no
specific criteria or requirements were specified in the RMP rule to
regulate the activities of facilities, implementing agencies, or third
parties with respect to third party assistance.
A facility's participation in the third party audit program proposed by
this action would be totally voluntary. For facilities who choose not
to participate in the program, this action would have no effect.
However if a facility participates, this regulation would establish the
requirements and regulatory incentives for their participation. For
participating sources, the action would offer the potential for reduced
regulatory burden (while maintaining their compliance
responsibilities), flexible auditing options, and other benefits,
provided the source meets the applicable requirements described in the
rule. This action also would specify the proposed qualification
requirements for persons desiring to act as third party auditors.
EPA believes that this action would promote increased safety among
facilities covered by the risk.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4511
Sectors Affected: 49312 Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage
Facilities; 22132 Sewage Treatment Facilities; 22131 Water Supply and
Irrigation Systems; 31161 Animal Slaughtering and Processing; 49311
General Warehousing and Storage Facilities; 42291 Farm Supplies
Wholesalers; 42269 Other Chemical and Allied Products Wholesalers;
49313 Farm Product Warehousing and Storage Facilities; 32512 Industrial
Gas Manufacturing; 11511 Support Activities for Crop Production
Agency Contact: James Belke, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-8023
Fax: 202 564-8444
Email: belke.jim@epa.gov
Breeda Reilly, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-7983
Fax: 202 584-8444
Email: reilly.breeda@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE85
_______________________________________________________________________
3413. NESHAP: CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Since the promulgation of the chromium electroplating NESHAP
we have been informed of several sources that are experiencing
difficulty in
[[Page 62282]]
complying with the concentration limit for new sources even though they
have installed and operate composite mesh pad scrubber technology
similar or identical to that used as the basis for the MACT emission
limit. These sources operate new state-of-the-art plating tanks not
encountered during rule development which feature enclosing hoods that
completely cover the surface of the plating tank. This covered tank
design allows for effective capture and ventilation at substantially
lower exhaust air flow rates than otherwise encountered with more
conventional exterior hooding. Although these sources exceed the new
source standard concentration limit of 0.015 mg/dscm, actual mass rate
emissions are more than 50 percent lower than would otherwise be
achieved with more conventional hooding and higher ventilation rates.
The chromium electroplating standard will be amended to include this
alternative type of control system.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4115
Sectors Affected: 332813 Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing
and Coloring
Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5289
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: mulrine.phil@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH69
_______________________________________________________________________
3414. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM NONROAD LARGE SPARK IGNITION ENGINES,
RECREATIONAL ENGINES (MARINE AND LAND-BASED), AND HIGHWAY MOTORCYCLES
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671(q)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 94
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, September 29, 2000.
Final, Judicial, December 31, 2001.
Abstract: Emissions from large spark-ignition engines are currently
unregulated. EPA and California Air Resources Board (CARB) are
cooperating in an effort to set emission standards for these engines to
substantially reduce their contribution to the emission inventory.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Proposed Finding 02/08/99 64 FR 6008
ANPRM Final Finding 12/07/00 65 FR 76790
NPRM 10/05/01 66 FR 51098
NPRM Comment Period End 12/19/01
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4154
Sectors Affected: 333924 Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer and Stacker
Machinery Manufacturing; 335312 Motor and Generator Manufacturing;
42183 Industrial Machinery and Equipment Wholesalers
Agency Contact: Alan Stout, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, EPCD, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4805
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: stout.alan@epamail.epa.gov
Don Kopinski, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, OMS
EPCD, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4229
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: kopinski.donald@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI11
_______________________________________________________________________
3415. REVIEW OF THE NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR
PARTICULATE MATTER
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 126 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AI44
_______________________________________________________________________
3416. TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY AMENDMENTS: RESPONSE TO MARCH 2, 1999,
COURT DECISION
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 127 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AI56
_______________________________________________________________________
3417. NATIONAL VOC EMISSION STANDARDS FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS; PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Amendments to the consumer products rule are being proposed
to clarify and correct the rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4309
Agency Contact: Bruce Moore, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5460
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: moore.bruce@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI62
[[Page 62283]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3418. NESHAP FOR THE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING INDUSTRY; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAAA 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 1994.
Abstract: The amendments will clarify the rule and ensure it reflects
the EPA's intent.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 4310
Agency Contact: Dave Salman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, (MD-13), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0859
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: salman.dave@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI66
_______________________________________________________________________
3419. NESHAP: BRICK AND STRUCTURAL CLAY PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: The brick and structural clay products industry primarily
includes facilities that manufacture brick, clay, pipe, roof tile,
extruded floor and wall tile, and other extruded dimensional clay
products from clay, shale, or a combination of the two. The manufacture
of brick and structural clay products involves mining, raw material
processing (crushing, grinding, and screening), mixing, forming,
cutting or shaping, drying, and firing.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4325
Sectors Affected: 327121 Brick and Structural Clay Tile Manufacturing;
327123 Other Structural Clay Product Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mary Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5025
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: johnson.mary@epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI67
_______________________________________________________________________
3420. NESHAP: CLAY CERAMICS MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Ceramics are defined as a class of inorganic, nonmetallic
solids that are subject to high temperature in manufacture and/or use.
The clay ceramics manufacturing source category includes facilities
that manufacture traditional ceramics. Traditional ceramics include
ceramic tile, dinnerware, sanitaryware, pottery, and porcelain. The
primary raw material used in the manufacture of traditional ceramics is
clay. The manufacture of clay ceramics involves raw material processing
(crushing, grinding, and screening), mixing, forming, shaping, drying,
glazing, and firing.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4343
Title in April 2001 Agenda: NESHAP: Clay Ceramics Manufacturing
Sectors Affected: 327122 Ceramic Wall and Floor Tile Manufacturing;
327111 Vitreous China Plumbing Fixture and China and Earthenware
Fittings and Bathroom Accessories Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mary Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5025
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: johnson.mary@epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI68
_______________________________________________________________________
3421. NESHAP: ENGINE TEST CELLS/STANDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: As required by section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act, the
Environmental Protection Agency has developed a list of categories of
sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP's). The HAP's are listed in
section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act. The Engine Test Facilities source
category are included on EPA's list of sources of HAP's. The Engine
Test Facilities source category includes any facility engaged in the
testing of stationary or mobile engines, including turbines and
reciprocating engines and rocket engines. Aircraft engine testing
consists of facilities which perform testing on uninstalled aircraft
engines. Non-aerospace engine test facilities consists of facilities
which perform testing on uninstalled engines such as automotive
engines, stationary turbines, IC engines, and diesel engines.
[[Page 62284]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4144
This action will cover the rocket engine test firing source category
RIN 2060-AH35
Agency Contact: Jaime Pagan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5340
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: pagan.jaime@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI74
_______________________________________________________________________
3422. DEVELOPMENT OF REFERENCE METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SOURCE
EMISSIONS OF FILTERABLE FINE PARTICULATE MATTER AS PM2.5
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 app M
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 15, 2001.
Abstract: Under this action, EPA is initiating the publication of a
reference test method that can be used to quantify that portion of
particulate matter emissions that are solid at stack conditions and are
equal to or less than 2.5 uM in aerodynamic diameter. This test method
is to be used in conjunction with existing and future reference methods
which are designed to quantify condensable particulate and particulate
precursors. Condensable particulate is that portion of particulate
matter emissions that are gaseous at stack conditions but which quickly
condense to a solid form when released to the atmosphere. Particulate
precursors are gaseous compounds which become solids as a result of
chemical reactions in the atmosphere. This test method supports the
amended National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for particulate
matter which was promulgated on July 18, 1997. The NAAQS was revised by
adding new standards for particulate of 2.5 uM aerodynamic diameter. An
important foundation element of State efforts to attain the NAAQS will
be the development of reliable inventories of baseline particulate and
particulate precursor emissions. The emission inventories developed
should be based upon credible source tests of individual facilities or
emission factors developed from credible source tests. At the present
time there is no reference test method available for quantifying the
filterable particulate matter of 2.5 uM aerodynamic diameter from
emission sources.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 11/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4306
Sectors Affected: 21231 Stone Mining and Quarrying; 221112 Fossil Fuel
Electric Power Generation; 3212 Veneer, Plywood and Engineered Wood
Product Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 3251 Basic Chemical
Manufacturing; 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing; 3311 Iron
and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy Manufacturing; 3313 Alumina and Aluminum
Production and Processing; 3314 Nonferrous Metal (except Aluminum)
Production and Processing; 3315 Foundries
Agency Contact: Ronald E. Myers, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5407
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: myers.ron@epa.gov
Tom Logan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-19,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-2580
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: logan.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI96
_______________________________________________________________________
3423. INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL
FACILITIES; AMENDMENT TO THE FINAL RULE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (Revision); 40 CFR 93 (New)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has had oversight
and policy development authority for Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)
programs since the passage of the Clean Air Act (CAA) in 1970. The 1977
amendments to the CAA mandated I/M for certain areas with long-term air
quality problems and the 1990 amendments set forth standards for
implementation of I/M programs. EPA used the statutory requirements of
the Act, including I/M requirements for Federal facilities, to
promulgate regulations which states would use in the development of
their I/M State Implementation Plans (SIPs). Those rule requirements
effectively gave States certain authorities over the Federal
government. The Department of Justice has now ruled that Federal
sovereign immunity was not fully waived under the CAA for those
requirements and EPA should amend its rule to remove the requirement
that States include those elements in their SIPs. EPA is proposing to:
(1) Amend the Federal facilities I/M requirements by removing that
section; (2) correct existing I/M SIP approval actions which include
these elements; (3) establish new Federal facilities I/M program
requirements which Federal facilities in I/M program areas must meet in
order to comply with the Act; and (4) designate for each State which
section of the Act Federal agencies must comply with based on how that
State promulgated its I/M regulations. These changes will have minimal
to no impact on the States as no new requirements are being created.
The States are under no obligation, legal or otherwise, to modify
existing SIPs meeting the previously applicable requirements as a
result of this action, nor will emissions reduction credit be affected.
However, the changes will clarify for affected Federal facilities what
they must do to meet the CAA requirements by establishing new
regulations per those requirements.
[[Page 62285]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4348
Agency Contact: Buddy Polovick, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4928
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: polovick.buddy@epa.gov
Sara Schneeberg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation
Phone: 202 564-5592
RIN: 2060-AI97
_______________________________________________________________________
3424. CONTROL OF METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering taking action to control the use of Methyl
Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE), which is an organic compound that is
primarily used as a fuel additive in gasoline. MTBE has been used to
meet the oxygen requirement established by the Federal Reformulated
Gasoline Program (RFG) established by the 1990 amendments to the Clean
Air Act (CAA). Over 85 percent of reformulated gasoline contains MTBE.
EPA is concerned that the widespread use of MTBE may have resulted in
the contamination of groundwater and drinking water supplies,
threatening their future use. While current detections levels are
generally believed to be below levels that may cause public health
concerns, low level MTBE contamination may render water unpotable due
to offensive taste and odor. In November of 1998, EPA established a
Blue Ribbon Panel to investigate air quality benefits and water quality
concerns associated with oxygenates, including MTBE, in gasoline, and
to provide independent advice and recommendations on ways to maintain
air quality while protecting water quality. In September, 1999, the
panel recommended that the use of MTBE be substantially reduced. EPA is
now evaluating the Blue Ribbon Panel's recommendations, and has
conducted a preliminary review of authorities available to address
risks associated with MTBE. EPA intends to issue an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking to inform the public of this preliminary inquiry,
and to solicit public comment on possible regulatory action.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 03/24/00 65 FR 16094
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4393
Agency Contact: Karen Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6406J
Phone: 202 564-9674
Fax: 202 565-2084
Email: smith.karen@epa.gov
Bob Perlis, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 2333A
Phone: 202 564-5636
Email: perlis.robert@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ00
_______________________________________________________________________
3425. NESHAP: TACONITE IRON ORE PROCESSING INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA 112
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: The taconite iron ore processing source category is comprised
of nine facilities operating in the United States. Seven facilities are
located in Minnesota and two are located in Michigan. The expected
sources of HAP emissions for this source category include: fossil fuel
combustion sources, and possibly the handling and transfer of mined ore
containing naturally occurring inorganic compounds. Anticipated HAP
emissions released from these sources primarily include: formaldehyde,
manganese, nickel, arsenic, and chromium. The quantities of HAP
released are expected to exceed major source levels.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4380
There are nine taconite processing facilities in the U.S.; seven are
located in Minnesota and two are located in Michigan. The MACT standard
for this industry group will be shared between EPA and the State of
Minnesota. State regulations currently in place include both air
emissions limitations and prohibition of effluent discharge to Great
Lakes waters, and both air and water monitoring requirements. Other
existing Federal regulations may be affected under RCRA and TSCA.
Agency Contact: Conrad Chin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1512
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: chin.conrad@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ02
_______________________________________________________________________
3426. UTILITY SECTOR NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE
PROGRAM
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52.21
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The New Source Review (NSR) Program is the principal means by
which EPA assures that new pollution sources install reasonably
effective air pollution controls before they are allowed to begin
operation. EPA is currently involved in a comprehensive rulemaking (NSR
Improvement, SAN 3259), intended to streamline the NSR program and
reduce its administrative burden. This new
[[Page 62286]]
rulemaking is an outgrowth of that reform effort, and will provide
industries with the flexibility to focus more on existing pollution
sources, with the goal of achieving as good or better environmental
results than could be achieved focusing strictly on new sources. The
Utility Sector NSR Alternative Compliance Program is a proposed
rulemaking that is an outgrowth of this action and will provide
industries with the flexibility to focus more on existing pollution
sources, with the goal of achieving as good or better environmental
results than could be achieved focusing strictly on new sources. The
Utility Sector NSR Alternative Compliance Program is a proposed
rulemaking that is an outgrowth of this action and will provide
industries with the flexibility to focus more on existing pollution
sources, with the goal of achieving as good or better environmental
results than could be achieved focusing strictly on new sources.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/02
Final Action 03/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4390
See also SAN 3259
Agency Contact: Kathy Kaufman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0102
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: kaufman.kathy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ14
_______________________________________________________________________
3427. INTERSTATE OZONE TRANSPORT: RESPONSE TO COURT DECISIONS ON THE NOX
SIP CALL, NOX SIP CALL TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS, AND SECTION 126 RULES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410(a)(2)(D); 7410(k)(5)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On October 27, 1998 (63 FR 57355), EPA issued a rule to
reduce smog in the eastern half of the country. The rule required 22
States and the District of Columbia to reduce emissions of nitrogen
oxides (NOx), which reacts with other chemicals in the atmosphere to
form smog. EPA required these reductions because pollution from each of
these States was transported by the wind and significantly contributed
to unhealthy air quality in downwind states. In response to litigation
from several parties on the NOx SIP call, the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia issued a decision on March 3, 2000
making it clear that EPA and States can and should move forward to
implement this regional strategy. The ruling remanded certain
relatively minor portions of the original rule back to the EPA. This
rulemaking covers the portion of the rule associated with the remanded
issues: certain cogeneration units, internal combustion engines, the
partial State requirements for Georgia & Missouri and the exclusion of
Wisconsin. In this rulemaking, EPA will consider the partial State
issue for Alabama & Michigan and propose SIP submittal dates and
compliance dates, as well. The D.C. Circuit Court also remanded, or
remanded and vacated, the cogeneration unit issue in decisions on the
NOx SIP Call Technical Amendments, and Section 126 Rule on June 8, 2001
and May 15, 2001, respectively. These remands will also be addressed in
this rulemaking.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4433
Agency Contact: Jan King, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5665
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: king.jan@epa.gov
Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ16
_______________________________________________________________________
3428. NESHAP FOR FRICTION PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This action will propose NESHAP for friction products
manufacturing in order to comply with the Clean Air Act of 1990 (CAA).
The friction products source category includes any facility that
manufactures friction products such as brakes and clutches. The rule is
expected to limit HAP emissions, including toluene, hexane, and 1,1,1
trichloroethane) from solvent mixing operations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/04/01 66 FR 50768
NPRM Comment Period End 12/03/01
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4460
Sectors Affected: 3363 Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing; 3364
Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing; 3369 Other Transportation
Equipment Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Kevin Cavender, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2364
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: cavender.kevin@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ18
[[Page 62287]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3429. RULEMAKINGS FOR THE PURPOSE OF REDUCING INTERSTATE OZONE TRANSPORT
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 128 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AJ20
_______________________________________________________________________
3430. PETITIONS TO DELIST SOURCE CATEGORIES FROM THE SOURCE CATEGORY
LIST, DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO SECTION 112(C) OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, April 21, 2000.
Abstract: The EPA has received 1 petition to remove a SC (2-Piece Can
Manufacturing) from the SC List developed pursuant to Section 112(c) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA). The most current SC List was published on
November 18, 1999 (64 FR 63025). Section 112(c)(9), which provides the
legislative authority and guidelines for such actions, states that the
Administrator may delete a SC from the list under Section 112(c), on
petition of any person or on the Administrator's own motion, whenever
the Administrator determines that no source in the category emits
hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) in quantities which may cause a
lifetime risk of cancer greater than 1 in one million to the individual
in the population who is most exposed and that emissions from no source
in the category exceed a level which is adequate to protect public
health with an ample margin of safety and that no adverse environmental
effect will result. As of August 30, 2001, 1 petition to delist a SC
has been received. It contains information on HAP emissions, exposures,
health effects, human risks, and potential ecological concerns as well
as the petitioner's explanation why the 2-Piece Can Manufacturing
should be removed from the SC List. The EPA will conduct a
comprehensive review of the petition received then decide whether to
grant or deny the petition. Section 112(c)(9) requires that within 12
months of receipt of a petition, the Administrator shall either grant
or deny the petition by publishing a written explanation of the reasons
for the Administrator's decision. We believe that petitions to delist
source categories are non-significant actions because they do not meet
any of the principles outlined in section A above.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4415
Agency Contact: Chuck French, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0467
Email: french.chuck@epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, RTP, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5368
RIN: 2060-AJ23
_______________________________________________________________________
3431. REVISING REGULATIONS ON AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 58 (Revision); 40 CFR 53 (Revision); 40 CFR 50
(Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Air pollution control authorities use air quality data to
determine compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
and in subsequent work to develop air pollution mitigation strategies.
The data come primarily from ambient air monitoring stations run by
State and local agencies, although Federal, tribal, and industrial
organizations also run stations. The design of the monitoring networks
is regulated under 40 CFR 58. This rule was originally written in 1979
and several revisions have been made in the intervening years. Air
pollution control authorities have improved their parts of the network
in response to changes in air quality, advances in the understanding of
the movements and health effects of air pollutants, and developments in
air pollution measurement technology. EPA has also cooperated with air
pollution control authorities to improve the networks, but we have not
revised the applicable regulations comprehensively. The proposed
revisions would remove real or perceived constraints on redeploying air
monitoring stations; more accurately reflect the roles of EPA and other
control authorities in designing, reviewing, and modifying networks;
bring provisions related to quality assurance up to date; and recognize
technological changes. The current regulations require states to
develop plans to deploy air monitoring networks, but they do not
emphasize administering the networks. States generally develop new
plans only when new monitoring is needed, such as for a new NAAQS. The
regulations should be revised to reflect the roles of EPA and the State
and local agencies.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4421
Sectors Affected: 334519 Other Measuring and Controlling Device
Manufacturing; 92411 Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management
Agency Contact: Mike Papp, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-14, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2408
Fax: 919 541-1903
Email: papp.michael@epa.gov
Lee Ann Byrd, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
14, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5367
Fax: 919 541-1903
Email: byrd.lee@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ25
_______________________________________________________________________
3432. CLARIFICATION TO EXISTING PART 63 NESHAP DELEGATIONS' PROVISIONS-
WORK PRACTICES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
[[Page 62288]]
Abstract: 40 CFR part 63 contains OAR's air-toxics emissions
regulations, often referred to as MACT rules or NESHAPS. We are
revising some part 63 standards to reflect changes in delegation
provisions. We are also revising some sections in the part 63
regulations to clarify what are standards and what are compliance
assurance measures. The benefits of the changes will include clarifying
what authorities in each standard can be delegated to State and local
air pollution control agencies and meshing the standards with revisions
previously made to other part 63 regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 10/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4426
Agency Contact: Tom Driscoll, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5135
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: driscoll.tom@epa.gov
Kathy Kaufman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0102
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: kaufman.kathy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ26
_______________________________________________________________________
3433. FEDERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SOLID
WASTE INCINERATION UNITS CONSTRUCTED ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 30, 1999
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act sections 111;
1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act sections 129; 1990 Amendments to
the Clean Air Act sections 301(a)(d)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 62
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 directed the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set emission guidelines for
existing incinerators combusting commercial or industrial waste under
sections 111 and 129. Final emission guidelines for Commercial and
Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) were published on December
1, 2000 (see 65 FR 75338). In accordance with section 129, any State
with affected sources must submit a State plan by December 1, 2001
describing how the State will implement the emission guidelines for
existing CISWI. Section 129 requires the Administrator to develop and
implement a Federal plan for existing CISWI units located in any State
which has not submitted an approvable plan within 2 years of
promulgation of the emissions guidelines. In this CISWI Federal plan
rulemaking, EPA becomes the implementing authority in those instances
where the State has failed to submit a plan or a plan has not yet been
approved. Therefore, consistent with section 129(b)(3) of the Act, EPA
is proposing a plan that applies to CISWI in any State that has not
submitted an approvable plan within the time allotted. This action
makes no changes to the requirements in the rule, and is intended to
fulfill EPA's duty under section 129(b)(3) to promulgate a Federal plan
as a gap-filling measure until the State fulfills its statutory
obligations. When the State submits an approvable State plan, the
Federal plan will no longer apply to units in that State.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 01/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4441
Sectors Affected: 321 Wood Product Manufacturing; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: David Painter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5515
Fax: 919 541-2664
Email: painter.david@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ28
_______________________________________________________________________
3434. REVISIONS TO PART 97 FEDERAL NOX BUDGET TRADING PROGRAM ALLOWANCE
ALLOCATION METHOD AND PART 75 OUTPUT AND EMISSIONS MONITORING PROVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401; 42 USC 7403; 42 USC 7426; 42 USC 7601; 42
USC 7651 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 75 (Revision); 40 CFR 97 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking package will propose two types of
modifications to the Code of Federal Regulations: revisions to parts 72
and 75 related to the existing Acid Rain Program; and, revisions to
part 75 and part 97 that are associated with the implementation of the
Federal NOx Budget Trading Program.
The proposed revisions to parts 72 and 75 pertaining to the Acid Rain
Program will improve the program's efficiency and effectiveness. These
revisions include technical corrections and clarifications to the
monitoring procedures that will improve quality of the SO2 and NOx
emissions data. Some reporting requirements will be modified to broaden
and improve electronic reporting provisions in order to reduce industry
burden and facilitate better data management within the Agency.
In support of the Federal NOx Budget Trading Program, EPA will propose
revisions to parts 72, 75, and 97. Parts 72 and 75 will be modified to
introduce procedural requirements for the monitoring and reporting of
output (i.e., electricity, steam, or heated water) for electric
generating units. The proposed revisions to part 97 will satisfy a
commitment the Agency made in the January 18, 2000 final section 126
rule to use output for updating NOx allowance allocations. Our analysis
predicts that updating allocations based on output will reduce air
pollution nationwide and will result in more efficient electricity
generation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
[[Page 62289]]
Additional Information: SAN No. 4448
Sectors Affected: 221111 Hydroelectric Power Generation
Agency Contact: Sam Waltzer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6204J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9175
Fax: 202 565-2140
Email: waltzer.sam@epa.gov
Margaret Sheppard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6204J
Phone: 202 564-9163
Fax: 202 565-2141
Email: sheppard.margaret
RIN: 2060-AJ30
_______________________________________________________________________
3435. NESHAP: PESTICIDES ACTIVE INGREDIENTS--AMENDMENTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On June 23, 1999, EPA promulgated the NESHAP for Pesticide
Active Ingredient Production (Production of Agricultural Chemicals).
Subsequently, a petition was filed on this rule, and EPA received the
list of issues filed with the court. There are four separate, but
related petitions. Major issues include applicability determination for
creosote producers, control requirements for left-over vents, averaging
period, and wastewater applicability cutoffs. This amendment will
address these issues raised by creosote producers. The other issues
will be addressed in a separate rulemaking.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4457
Split from RIN 2060-AE84.
Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5402
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ34
_______________________________________________________________________
3436. NESHAP: GASOLINE DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES -- AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.425(e)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will add a DOT test method as an alternative for
measuring emissions from railcars. This method came to our attention
subsequent to promulgation of the original rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4479
Agency Contact: Steve Shedd, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5397
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: shedd.steve@epa.gov
Martha Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ42
_______________________________________________________________________
3437. NESHAP: AMINO/PHENOLIC RESINS: AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 12 USC 1701 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subpart 000
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Amino and Phenolic Wood Adhesives Association (APWAA) has
filed a petition for review of the final rule. APWAA has identified two
areas of concern in their statement of issue. First of all APWAA claims
that EPA was unjustified in going above the floor level of control to
include equipment requirements equivalent to the Consolidated Air Rule
(CAR) for new and existing sources. APWAA believes EPA should use the
floor level of control for both new and existing sources. For existing
sources there is no floor, and for new sources the floor level of
control is equivalent to the requirements included in 40 CFR part 60
subpart VV. The second issue identified by APWAA is the way the
requirements for non-reactor batch vents were calculated. The current
rule has a 500 lbs per year applicability cutoff for non-reactor batch
vents at the facility level. APWAA has stated that the cutoff should be
applicable to individual vents instead of the entire facility.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4484
Sectors Affected: 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing
Agency Contact: John Schaefer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0296
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: schaefer.john@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ45
_______________________________________________________________________
3438. INDOOR AIR TOXICS STRATEGY
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Indoor Air Toxics Strategy is a plan to reduce risks from
[[Page 62290]]
toxic air pollutants indoors and is in response to the July 19, 1999
release of the National Air Toxics Program/Integrated Urban Air Toxics
Strategy (64 FR 38706). The latter strategy recognized that, although
exposures to air toxics indoors may be significant, the risks
associated with indoor exposures are not as well characterized as those
for exposures outdoors. The Indoor Air Toxics Strategy will present the
results of a screening-level ranking and selection of key air toxics
indoors, which was performed to help us prioritize our future efforts
in this area, and will present a plan to work with outside stakeholders
to further characterize and reduce risks from air toxics indoors. The
Indoor Air Toxics Strategy will rely heavily on voluntary, non-
regulatory efforts.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Draft Notice 01/00/02
Final Notice 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4494
Agency Contact: Pauline Johnston, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6609J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9425
Fax: 202 565-2039
Email: johnston.pauline@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ49
_______________________________________________________________________
3439. REVISIONS TO REGIONAL HAZE RULE TO INCORPORATE SULFUR DIOXIDE
MILESTONES AND BACKSTOP EMISSIONS TRADING PROGRAM FOR NINE WESTERN
STATES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7421; 42 USC 7470 to
7479; 42 USC 7491; 42 USC 7492; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7602
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.309
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulation is for an action anticipated by the regional
haze rule that we published in July 1999. One portion of the regional
haze rule was an optional visibility protection program for nine
Western States. Part of this program for the West, a long-term program
to reduce stationary source emissions of sulfur dioxide, was incomplete
at the time of the 1999 rule. Accordingly, the rule required Western
States to submit an ``Annex'' to an earlier report of the Grand Canyon
Visibility Transport Commission. We required the Annex to contain
sulfur dioxide milestones for the years 2003 to 2018, to establish a
program to track emissions from stationary sources over this time
period, and to provide the details of a market trading program that
would be triggered if a milestone is exceeded. The Western Regional Air
Partnership submitted the Annex on September 29, 2000. The purpose of
this rulemaking is to determine whether the Annex meets the
requirements of the regional haze rule and the Clean Air Act, and if it
does, to amend the regional haze rule to incorporate its provisions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 01/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4495
Agency Contact: Tim Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD 15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4718
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: smith.tim@epa.gov
Rich Damberg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-15
Phone: 919 541-5592
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: damberg.rich@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ50
_______________________________________________________________________
3440. NESHAP: PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY, AMENDMENTS TO RULE
TO IMPLEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1340 to 63.1359
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry NESHAP was
promulgated June 14, 1999. The rule is codified in 40 CFR 63, Subpart
LLL. This rule is being revised to reflect a pending settlement
agreement with the American Portland Cement Alliance. The rule changes
will be minor, and mostly will help to clarify requirements, provide
monitoring alternatives and/or remove minor monitoring requirements.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 4524
Sectors Affected: 32731 Cement Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Tripp Boone, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5625
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: boone.tripp@epa.gov
Joe Wood, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5446
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: wood.joe@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ57
_______________________________________________________________________
3441. EVALUATION OF UPDATED TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE CERTIFICATION OF
GASOLINE DEPOSIT CONTROL ADDITIVES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: All gasoline must contain additives to control the formation
of deposits in the fuel supply system and engine of motor vehicles. If
uncontrolled, such deposits can result in a significant increase in
motor vehicle emissions. This action will propose that updated test
procedures be adopted for the certification of gasoline deposit control
additives regarding
[[Page 62291]]
their ability to control fuel injector and intake valve deposits. The
adoption of the updated procedures will ensure that the gasoline
deposit control program continues to ensure an adequate level of
deposit control, thereby preventing an increase in motor vehicle
emissions. The updated test procedures require less time to perform and
are less costly. Therefore, the adoption of the proposed procedures
will reduce the burden on industry of complying with the gasoline
deposit control program. The proposed action will not impact small
businesses, or state, local, or tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4531
Agency Contact: Jeffrey A. Herzog, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, ASD, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4227
Fax: 734 214-4051
Email: herzog.jeff@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ61
_______________________________________________________________________
3442. MOTOR VEHICLE AND ENGINE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FEES FOR: LIGHT-DUTY
VEHICLES AND TRUCKS; HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES AND ENGINES; NONROAD ENGINES;
AND MOTORCYCLES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7552; 31 USC 9701; 42 USC 4370(c)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Motor Vehicle and Engine Compliance (MVECP) Fee
Program user fees are collected for certification and compliance
activities. Currently, user fees are required by manufacturers of
light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks, heavy-duty vehicles, heavy-duty
engines and motorcycles. Through this Notice, EPA is proposing to
update the current fee provisions for the existing industries and
incorporate fees for nonroad manufacturers. In addition, the fee
schedule will be updated to reflect costs in administering compliance
activities for new regulations such as the ``Tier 2'' automobile
standards and nonroad engine standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4532
Sectors Affected: 333 Machinery Manufacturing; 3331 Agriculture,
Construction, and Mining Machinery Manufacturing; 333111 Farm Machinery
and Equipment Manufacturing; 333112 Lawn and Garden Tractor and Home
Lawn and Garden Equipment Manufacturing; 33312 Construction Machinery
Manufacturing; 333131 Mining Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing;
3336 Engine, Turbine, and Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing;
33651 Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing; 3361 Motor Vehicle
Manufacturing; 33611 Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle
Manufacturing; 336112 Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing;
33612 Heavy Duty Truck Manufacturing; 336311 Carburetor, Piston, Piston
Ring and Valve Manufacturing; 336412 Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts
Manufacturing; 33661 Ship and Boat Building; 336991 Motorcycle, Bicycle
and Parts Manufacturing; 333 Machinery Manufacturing; 33392 Material
Handling Equipment Manufacturing; 333924 Industrial Truck, Tractor,
Trailer and Stacker Machinery Manufacturing; 33399 All Other General
Purpose Machinery Manufacturing; 333991 Power-Driven Hand Tool
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Trina D. Vallion, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, OTAQ/CCD, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4449
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: vallion.trina@epa.gov
Daniel Harrison, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
OTAQ/CCd
Phone: 734 214-4281
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: harrison.dan@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ62
_______________________________________________________________________
3443. ELECTRIC UTILITY STEAM GENERATING UNIT MACT REGULATION
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 129 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AJ65
_______________________________________________________________________
3444. ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE NSPS AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60.270 to 60.276a
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Sources affected by the NSPS for electric arc furnaces
(subparts AA, and AAa) have expressed concerns with the requirements in
the NSPS to use a continuous opacity monitor (COM) to monitor opacity
and report periods when the COM indicated greater than 3 percent
opacity as periods of excess emissions, and have petitioned the EPA to
reconsider the COM requirements. These concerns arise from recent
information that indicate that COM readings may have an error of up to
4 percent, which in itself is greater than the 3 percent excess
emissions threshold. The EPA is reconsidering the COM requirements, and
may amend the NSPS to add alternative monitoring requirements.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4555
Agency Contact: Kevin Cavender, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2364
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: cavender.kevin@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
[[Page 62292]]
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ68
_______________________________________________________________________
3445. TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY RULE AMENDMENTS: MINOR
REVISION AND ADDITION OF GRACE PERIOD FOR NEWLY DESIGNATED NONATTAINMENT
AREAS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 93
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action is the result of a recent amendment to the Clean
Air Act and a 1999 court decision on the same Act. It provides greater
flexibility and more time for state and local governments to evaluate
and ensure that their transportation plans will not worsen air quality
conditions in areas where air quality standards have been established
to protect public health and the environment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/05/01 66 FR 50954
NPRM Comment Period End 11/05/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4558
Agency Contact: Denise Kearns, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4240
Fax: 734 214-4906
Email: kearns.denise@epa.gov
Meg Patulski, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4842
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: patulski.meg@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ70
_______________________________________________________________________
3446. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLES AND
ENGINES: ALTERNATIVE LOW-SULFUR HIGHWAY DIESEL FUEL TRANSITION PROGRAM
FOR ALASKA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a); 42 USC 7625-
1
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 69 and 80 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will carry out a flexibility provision for Alaska
that was included in EPA's heavy-duty diesel rule, which was
promulgated on January 18, 2001. That rule established more stringent
national emission standards for heavy-duty highway vehicles and engines
for the 2007 model year, and a technology-enabling sulfur limit of 15
ppm for highway diesel fuel beginning in 2006. In that rule, EPA
recognized Alaska's unique geographical, meteorological, air quality,
and economic factors and provided Alaska an opportunity to develop its
own plan to transition to low-sulfur highway diesel fuel, as an
alternative to the national transition program. Our goal in offering
this flexibility is to transition Alaska into the low-sulfur fuel
program in a manner that minimizes costs, while ensuring that the new
vehicles and engines receive the low-sulfur fuel they need. As stated
in the Federal Register notice for the diesel rule, if Alaska submits
an alternative plan by April 1, 2002, and if EPA determines that it
provides a reasonable alternative, EPA intends to initiate rulemaking
and, within one year from the date of Alaska's submittal, promulgate a
final rule to incorporate the alternative plan. A stakeholder process
to develop options is already underway in Alaska, and the State
informed EPA that it intends to submit an alternative transition plan
in late 2001 or early 2002. This action will be in response to that
anticipated submittal.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4570
Sectors Affected: 336112 Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Richard Babst, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, EN-340-F, 6406-J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9473
Fax: 202 565-2085
Email: babst.richard@epa.gov
Mike Shields, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406-
J
Phone: 202 564-9035
Fax: 202 565-2085
Email: shields.mike@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ72
_______________________________________________________________________
3447. NON-CONFORMANCE PENALTIES FOR 2004 AND LATER MODEL YEAR
HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL ENGINES AND HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL VEHICLES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7525(g)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86.1105
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 206(g) of the Clean Air Act requires EPA to issue a
certificate of conformity for heavy-duty engines or heavy-duty vehicles
which exceed an applicable emission standard, but do not exceed an
upper limit associated with that standard, if the manufacturer pays a
non-conformance penalty (NCP) established by rulemaking. Three basic
criteria are used to determine the eligibility of emission standards
for NCPs. First, the emission standard in question must become more
difficult to meet (e.g., through increased stringency). Second,
substantial work must be required to meet the emission standard. Third,
a technological laggard must be likely to develop. A technological
laggard is defined as a manufacturer who cannot meet a particular
emission standard due to technological difficulties, and, in the
absence of NCPs, might be forced from the marketplace. This rule will
propose that these criteria are fulfilled with respect to the 2004
model year non-methane hydrocarbon plus nitrogen oxide standard
established in 1997 for heavy-duty diesel engines and heavy-duty diesel
vehicles. The rule will propose specific NCPs available for
manufacturers unable to comply with this standard.
[[Page 62293]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4573
Sectors Affected: 33612 Heavy Duty Truck Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Rob French, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4380
Fax: 734 214-4869
Email: french.roberts@epa.gov
Bill Charmley, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation
Phone: 734 214-4466
Email: charmley.william@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ73
_______________________________________________________________________
3448. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: ASSORTED AMENDMENTS
TO THE PHASEOUT OF CLASS I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES - CHANGES UNDER THE
MONTREAL PROTOCOL
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.1 to 82.13
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The U.S. regulatory program is being amended to reflect
changes in the international treaty, ``The Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.'' These amendments: (1) will
change the amount of class I ozone-depleting substances that can be
produced in the United States for export to developing countries, (2)
will create procedures for the transfer of allowances and CFCs under
the essential-use exemption for metered-dose inhalers, and (3) ban the
trade of methyl bromide with countries that are not parties (not
signatories) to the Montreal Protocol.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4574
Sectors Affected: 32519 Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing;
32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 3254
Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9185
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: land.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ74
_______________________________________________________________________
3449. MODIFICATION OF FEDERAL ON-BOARD DIAGNOSTIC REGULATIONS
FOR 2004 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES BELOW 14,000 POUNDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 12 USC 1701q
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule proposes revisions to the existing Light-Duty On-
Board Diagnostic Requirements, including revisions that will: (1)
require vehicle manufacturers to monitor the catalyst for NOx emission
performance in addition to existing requirements to monitor NMHC
performance, whichever is more stringent; (2) require monitoring of the
evaporative emissions systems for the presence of 0.020`` leaks or
greater and allow for non-intrusive, engine-off methods to perform
monitoring instead of the current requirements to monitor for the
presence of a 0.040'' leak or greater during vehicle operation; (3)
allow the use of the Control Area Network (CAN) Protocol (SAE 15765-4)
for OBD communications in addition to the other allowable SAE (J1850,
J1939) and ISO (9141, 14230-4); (4) new software and hardware changes
to aid in OBD-I/M program implementation including adding vehicle
dentification number (VIN) to the generic datastream, confining the
physical location of the data link connector, and allowing the use of
the malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) and a special key sequence to
indicate readiness; (5) add new generic data stream parameters to aid
in the repair and diagnosis of vehicle malfunctions; (6) require
manufacturers to record critical pieces of OBD information under the
CAP 2000 In-Use Verification Program (IUVP); and (7) establish new OBD
in-use performance demonstration standards used to determine
appropriate frequency of monitoring in the real world; such in-use
performance standards do not currently exist which places a greater
burden on our in use program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4583
Sectors Affected: 33611 Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Arvon Mitcham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4522
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: mitcham.arvon@epa.gov
Holly Pugliese, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, Ann
Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4288
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: pugliese.holly@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ77
_______________________________________________________________________
3450. REGULATION TO ESTABLISH NEW DATE FOR RECEIPT OF SUMMER
GRADE RFG AT TERMINALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.78
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will establish a new date of April 1 for receipt of
summer grade reformulated gasoline at terminals. The rule is intended
to alleviate gasoline supply shortfalls during the winter to summer
transition period.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4592
[[Page 62294]]
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries
Agency Contact: Chris McKenna, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9037
Fax: 240 363-8260
Email: mckenna.chris@epa.gov
Barry Garelick, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6406J
Phone: 202 564-9028
Fax: 202 564-2085
Email: garelick.barry@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ79
_______________________________________________________________________
3451. RELAXATION OF SUMMER GASOLINE VOLATILITY STANDARD FOR
DENVER/BOULDER AREA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.27(a)(2) (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is relaxing the summertime volatility standard (Reid
Vapor Pressure - RVP) for conventional gasoline in the Denver/Boulder
area from 7.8 pounds per square inch (``psi'') to 9.0 psi. This action
is consistent with, and a result of, the actions EPA is taking to
redesignate the Denver/Boulder area to be in attainment with the one-
hour ozone standard and to approve the maintenance plan for the Denver/
Boulder area. It is also consistent with past waivers that EPA has
granted to allow 9.0 psi RVP gasoline in the Denver/Boulder area since
1992. EPA does not believe that this action will cause environmental
harm to the Denver/Boulder area, or that it will adversely impact small
businesses or state and local governments. The area has been in
compliance with the ozone standard since 1987.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4593
Agency Contact: Richard Babst, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, EN-340-F, 6406-J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9473
Fax: 202 565-2085
Email: babst.richard@epa.gov
Mike Shields, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406-
J
Phone: 202 564-9035
Fax: 202 565-2085
Email: shields.mike@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ80
_______________________________________________________________________
3452. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: ALLOCATION OF YEAR
2002 ESSENTIAL USE ALLOWANCES
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671-7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.4(t)(2)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: With this action EPA is allocating essential use exemptions
to U.S. entities to produce and/or import class I ozone depleting
substances for uses considered to be essential under the Montreal
Protocol. These exemptions include the following: pharmaceutical grade
CFCs for use in metered dose inhalers used in the treatment of asthma,
methyl chloroform for use in the space shuttle and titan rockets, and
class I substances for most laboratory and analytical uses.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/01/01 66 FR 55145
NPRM Comment Period End 12/03/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4594
Sectors Affected: 54171 Research and Development in the Physical
Sciences and Engineering Sciences; 54162 Environmental Consulting
Services; 6215 Medical and Diagnostic Laboratories; 3254 Pharmaceutical
and Medicine Manufacturing; 33641 Aerospace Product and Parts
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Erin Birgfeld, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9079
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: birgfeld.erin@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ81
_______________________________________________________________________
3453. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO GRANT ALTERNATIVE METHOD
APPROVALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Currently, stationary source regulations cite specific test
methods to demonstrate compliance. If a source locates a test method
which will measure the regulated pollutant(s) with similar precision
and accuracy to the method cited in the regulation, and would like to
use the alternative method, the source must petition the EPA (along
with data documenting the applicability of the alternative) to allow
the alternative method. Each of these alternative method approvals by
letter may currently only be granted to a specific source. Source
category-wide approvals must be published for comment in the Federal
Register. Due to budgetary and time constraints, the process constrains
industry trade associations from developing and submitting alternative
test methods. Therefore, the purpose of this rulemaking is to modify
the regulations to allow source category-wide alternative method
approvals to be issued by letter.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 08/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4547
Agency Contact: Rima Howell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-0443
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: howell.rima@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ83
[[Page 62295]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3454. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTINUOUS PARAMETER
MONITORING SYSTEMS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 app B (New); 40 CFR 60 app F (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action proposes Performance Specification 17 (PS-17),
Quality Assurance (QA) Procedure 4, and amendments to Appendix F, QA
Procedure 1. Performance Specification 17 and QA Procedure 4 apply to
continuous parameter monitoring systems (CPMS). Many of the rules
promulgated under 40 CFR part 63 require owners and operators of
affected emission units to install and operate CPMS to monitor various
parameters, such as temperature, pressure, flow rate, and pH,
associated with the operation and performance of emission control
devices. However, few, if any, of those rules specify complete
procedures for ensuring the quality of the data measured by CPMS. The
proposed PS-17 establishes procedures and other requirements that will
ensure that those CPMS are properly selected, installed, and placed
into operation. The proposed QA Procedure 4 specifies procedures that
will ensure that those CPMS provide quality data on an ongoing basis.
Both PS-17 and QA Procedure 4 will help to ensure compliance with
emission limitations established under 40 CFR part 63. Procedure 1 of
Appendix F currently addresses QA procedures for continuous emission
monitoring systems (CEMS) that measure a single pollutant. The proposed
amendments to QA Procedure 1 broadens the procedure to address the
unique requirements of CEMS that are used for monitoring multiple
pollutants. Because several of the regulations promulgated under 40 CFR
part 63 require multiple pollutant CEMS, these amendments are needed to
ensure those CEMS are operated in a manner that ensures the quality of
the emission data collected. This action is not expected to have any
impacts on small entities or State, local, or tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4584
Sectors Affected: 21 Mining; 22 Utilities; 31-33 Manufacturing; 486
Pipeline Transportation; 562212 Solid Waste Landfill; 562213 Solid
Waste Combustors and Incinerators
Agency Contact: Barrett Parker, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, EN-341W, MD-19
Phone: 919 541-5635
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: parker.barrett@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ86
_______________________________________________________________________
3455. BENZENE WASTE OPERATIONS NESHAP; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7626
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This amendment will add a compliance option for tanks, making
the Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP consistent with the RCRA CC rules.
Hazardous waste treatment facilities have requested these amendments
because they must comply with both rules. There will be no cost as a
result of this action and there is no emission reduction. We expect no
negative impacts on small businesses and State/local/tribal
governments. Industry and government support this change.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4591
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing; 3311 Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy Manufacturing;
562211 Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal
Agency Contact: Bob Lucas, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-0884
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: lucas.bob@epa.gov
Kent C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ87
_______________________________________________________________________
3456. PROPSED AMENDMENTS TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR PARTICULATE MATTER AT STATIONARY SOURCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 app B; 40 CFR 60 app F
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would repropose some monitoring specifications
that were originally included in an OSWER proposal to regulate air
emissions from hazardous waste combustors (as explained further below).
It revises several standards and requirements related to continuous
emission monitoring systems for particulate matter (PM). These include:
specifications and test procedures known as Performance Specification
11 (PS-11), and quality assurance requirements known as ``Procedure
2''. The proposed revisions clarify and update performance standards
and monitoring requirements for facilities required to install and use
continuous monitoring equipment to measure particulate matter emissions
from stacks and ducts. The action does not change any emission
standards or add any additional recordkeeping requirements. This action
is a supplement to actions by EPA's OSWER that included proposed
regulations for hazardous waste combustors. The first action was
published in the Federal Register on December 30, 1997 (62 FR 67788).
Recent OAR field studies have revealed needed revisions to PS-11 and
Procedure 2. In view of the significant amount of time that has passed
since the last proposal was published (December 30, 1997) and the
significant amount of knowledge we have recently gained from our field
studies, we believe that a supplemental proposal and another
opportunity for the public to comment on PS-11 and Procedure 2 are
appropriate. The need to do this reproposal only recently became
evident, and we apologize for the short
[[Page 62296]]
time between tiering and the expected proposal date.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4605
Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation
Agency Contact: Daniel Bivins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5244
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: bivins.dan@epa.gov
Conniesue Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation
Phone: 919 541-7774
Fax: 919 541-1039
RIN: 2060-AJ88
_______________________________________________________________________
3457. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM SPARK IGNITION MARINE VESSELS
AND HIGHWAY MOTORCYCLES
Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671(q)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 94
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is pursuing brand new evaporative controls on vessels
powered up by spark ignition engines. EPA is also developing tighter
standards for highway motorcycles.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4626
Split from RIN 2060-AI11.
Sectors Affected: 333924 Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer and Stacker
Machinery Manufacturing; 335312 Motor and Generator Manufacturing;
42183 Industrial Machinery and Equipment Wholesalers
Agency Contact: Alan Stout, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, EPCD, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4805
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: stout.alan@epamail.epa.gov
Don Kopinski, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, OMS
EPCD, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4229
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: kopinski.donald@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ90
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3458. SOURCE-SPECIFIC FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR NAVAJO GENERATING
STATION; FOUR CORNERS POWER PLANT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 1740
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA proposes to federalize standards from the Arizona and New
Mexico State Implementation Plans (SIPS) applicable to the Four Corners
Plant, respectively. Where necessary, EPA's proposed emission standards
modify the standards extracted from the States' regulatory programs to
ensure comprehensive emission control and Federal consistency.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/08/99 64 FR 48731
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 3569
NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1999/September/Day-08/a23277.htm.; Formerly listed as RIN 2060-AF42,
NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1999/September/Day-08/a23277.htm
Agency Contact: Douglas McDaniel, Environmental Protection Agency,
Regional Office San Francisco, Region 9, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901
Phone: 415 744-1246
Colleen McKaughan, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office San
Francisco
Phone: 520 498-0118
RIN: 2009-AA01
_______________________________________________________________________
3459. NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) IMPROVEMENT
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 139 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2060-AE11
_______________________________________________________________________
3460. NSPS: SYNTHETIC ORGANIC CHEMICALS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY -
WASTEWATER (FINAL) & AMEND. TO APPENDIX C OF PART 63 & APPENDIX J OF
PART 60
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: CAAA
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will develop a new source performance standard to
control air emissions of volatile organic compounds from wastewater
treatment operations of the synthetic chemical manufacturing industry.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/12/94 59 FR 46780
Supp NPRM-1st 10/11/95 60 FR 52889
[[Page 62297]]
Supp NPRM-2nd Appendix J to Part
60 12/09/98 63 FR 67988
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3380
Supp NPRM-2nd- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/December/Day-09/a28472a.htm
Sectors Affected: 3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mary Tom Kissell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4516
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: kissell.mary@epa.gov
Kent C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE94
_______________________________________________________________________
3461. NESHAP: PETROLEUM REFINERIES; CATALYTIC CRACKING UNITS, CATALYTIC
REFORMING UNITS AND SULFUR RECOVERY UNITS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq; PL 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 requires
EPA to develop national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAPs). EPA promulgated NESHAP rules for petroleum refineries on
August 18, 1995 (RIN 2060-AD94). This action covers three process vents
not covered under RIN 2060-AD94. These are the catalyst regeneration
vents from fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCU) and catalytic
reformers and the tail gas vents from sulfur recovery plants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/11/98 63 FR 48889
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3549
NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/September/Day-11/a23508.htm
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries
Agency Contact: Bob Lucas, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-0884
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: lucas.bob@epa.gov
Kent C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF28
_______________________________________________________________________
3462. METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS--ADDITION OF METHODS
203A, 203B, AND 203C TO APPENDIX M OF PART 51
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401(b)(1); 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7470 to 7479;
42 USC 7501 to 7508; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking adds Test Methods 203A, 203B, and 203C to 40
CFR part 51, appendix M (entitled Example Test Methods for State
Implementation Plans). These methods describe procedures for estimating
the opacity of visible emissions. States have requested that EPA
promulgate these methods so that they can use them in State
Implementation Plans in enforcing visible emissions regulations from
Stationary Sources.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/22/93 58 FR 61639
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 2915
Agency Contact: Peter Westlin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-1058
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: westlin.peter@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF83
_______________________________________________________________________
3463. SERVICE INFORMATION REGULATION FOR LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES AND TRUCKS.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521(m)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will require manufacturers of automobiles to
provide necessary information needed to make use of emission control
diagnostic systems as well as that needed to make emission-related
diagnosis and repairs by any person engaged in the repairing or
servicing of motor vehicles or motor vehicle engines. This will allow
independent service repair garages, individual owners, parts
manufacturers, etc., to have access to emission control information to
better service automobiles and ensure clean air compliance
requirements.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/08/01 66 FR 30830
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3741
Agency Contact: Holly Pugliese, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4288
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: pugliese.holly@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG13
[[Page 62298]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3464. ADDITION OF METHOD 207 TO APPENDIX M OF 40 CFR PART 51 METHOD FOR
MEASURING ISOCYANATES IN STATIONARY SOURCE EMISSIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 listed certain
isocyanate compounds as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The Agency
does not have any published test methods that would measure air
emissions of these isocyanate compounds from stationary sources. This
action would add a validated test method to measure isocyanate
emissions to appendix M of part 51. Test methods in part 51 can be
adopted by any State for use in any regulation that requires the
measurement of any of the isocyanate compounds on the HAP list. This
action would not impose any new regulatory requirements that do not
already exist. It should benefit State governments by providing them
with a validated test procedure for measuring the emissions of
isocyanate compounds.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/08/97 62 FR 64532
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3900
Agency Contact: Gary McAlister, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-1062
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: mcalister.gary@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG88
_______________________________________________________________________
3465. NESHAP: CELLULOSE PRODUCTION MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This project is to develop national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPs) by establishing maximum achievable
control technology (MACT) for facilities manufacturing cellulose ether,
carboxymethyl cellulose ether, methyl cellulose ether, cellulose food
casing, cellulosic sponges, producing rayon, and producing cellophane.
MACT standards are under development to reduce the release of hazardous
air pollutants (HAP) from all industries to protect the public health
and environment. Emissions of HAP from this industry have been
associated with, but are not limited to, product washing operations,
material storage tanks, and film drying.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/28/00 65 FR 52166
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3970
Project combined with SAN 3963
Sectors Affected: 325221 Cellulosic Organic Fiber Manufacturing; 326113
Unsupported Plastics Film and Sheet (except Packaging) Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bill Schrock, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5032
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: schrock.bill@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH11
_______________________________________________________________________
3466. CONSOLIDATED EMISSIONS REPORTING RULE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 110(a)(2)(F)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.321 to 51.323
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Three sections of the Clean Air Act and its amendments
require State agencies to report emission estimates to EPA. Some of
these sections contain obsolete wording, inconsistent instructions, and
duplicate reporting requirements. This rule will consolidate the
requirements into one area, eliminate obsolete wording, eliminate
duplicate reporting requirements, and provide options for collecting
and reporting data. There will be no impact on small businesses. State
agencies will report point, area, and mobile source emissions
statewide. State agencies will also report fine particulate matter and
its precursors. The rule will provide for flexibility in collecting and
reporting data.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/23/00 65 FR 33268
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3986
Agency Contact: William B. Kuykendal, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, MD-14, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5372
Fax: 919 541-0684
Email: kuykendal.bill@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH25
_______________________________________________________________________
3467. EXPANDED DEFINITIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE-FUELED VEHICLES AND ENGINES
MEETING LOW-EMISSION VEHICLE EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2001; 15 USC 2002; 15 USC 2003; 15 USC 2005; 15
USC 2006; 15 USC 213; 42 USC 7521; 42 USC 7522; 42 USC 7524; 42 USC
7525; 42 USC 7541; 42 USC 7542; 42 USC 7549; 42 USC 7550; 42 USC 7552
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 88
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will ease the burden of certification for both
Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and after-market conversion
entities. This action will, for vehicles and engines meeting LEV
emission standards, broaden the definition of the term dedicated fuel
system, broaden the criteria for engine families, and provide
[[Page 62299]]
an exemption from certification fees. This action is not a deregulatory
action. This action will provide another means for small business to
remain active entities in supplying alternatively fueled vehicles to
the market place. The above three changes are intended to reduce the
cost of complying with the requirements of certification, and small
business will benefit from these changes. This action will enhance the
ability for the regulated industry to provide alternatively fueled
vehicles to the consumer in support of the Executive Order 13031.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/20/98 63 FR 38767
Notice 05/14/99 64 FR 26410
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4030
Agency Contact: Sam Napolitano, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6405J, Washington, DC 20640
Phone: 734 214-4310
Email: sam.napolitano@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH52
_______________________________________________________________________
3468. NESHAP: COKE OVENS: PUSHING, QUENCHING, AND BATTERY STACKS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: There are currently 25 active domestic coke plants, 20 of
which are furnace coke plants and 5 of which are foundry coke plants.
Coke oven batteries used to produce metallurgical coke at these plants
emit hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) such as coke oven emissions and
polycyclic organic matter listed in section 112 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA). This action will establish a National Emission Standard for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for three specific operations
associated with coke ovens, namely pushing, quenching, and battery
stacks.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/03/01 66 FR 35326
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4022
Sectors Affected: 324199 All Other Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing; 331111 Iron and Steel Mills
Agency Contact: Lula Melton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2910
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: melton.lula@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH55
_______________________________________________________________________
3469. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: ALLOWANCE SYSTEM FOR
CONTROLLING HCFC PRODUCTION, IMPORT & EXPORT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.5(h); 40 CFR 82.6(h); 40 CFR 82.8; 40 CFR
82.4(n)-(s); 40 CFR 82.4(u)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Stratospheric Protection Division currently oversees an
allowance allocation system for the class I ozone-depleting substances.
An allowance allocation system for class II ozone-depleting substances
or hydrochloroflurocarbons (HCFCs) had not been established prior to
1998 because consumption figures had hovered around 80% of the cap
imposed by the Montreal Protocol in 1992. The HCFC consumption figures
for 1999 indicate that the US is within 95% of the cap; the figures for
2000 were in the low 90s. Since the US is in danger of violating this
cap if high HCFC consumption rates continue into 2001, the system for
allocating allowances must be in place as soon as possible in order to
control HCFC consumption for all four quarters of 2002.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 04/04/99 64 FR 16373
NPRM 07/20/01 66 FR 38064
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4120
Additional deadline: Montreal Protocol. The Protocol requires
compliance with formulary caps of all Parties' consumption and
production of HCFCs. The ANPRM and the NPRM are available on the
Internet at: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/phaseout/phaseout.html
Agency Contact: Vera Au, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2216
Fax: 202 565-2156
Email: au.vera@epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9185
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: land.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH67
_______________________________________________________________________
3470. NESHAP: POLYVINYL CHLORIDE AND COPOLYMERS PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 1857
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 requires
EPA to develop emission standards for each major source category of
hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The standards are to be technology-
based and are to require the maximum degree of emission reduction
determined to be achievable by the administrator of the EPA. The EPA
has determined that some plants may be major sources for one or more
HAPs. As a consequence, a regulation (emission standards) is being
developed for the polyvinyl chloride industry, to be promulgated by
November 15, 2000.
[[Page 62300]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/08/00 65 FR 76958
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 4114
Agency Contact: Warren Johnson,Jr., Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5124
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: johnson.warren@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH82
_______________________________________________________________________
3471. PHASE I FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (FIPS) TO REDUCE THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORT OF OZONE IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 97
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, EPA is required to promulgate FIPs by
January 25.
NPRM, Statutory, 2003 unless States submit approvable plans.
Abstract: This action would promulgate Federal Implementation Plans
(FIPs) which require nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions decreases. The
intended effect is to reduce the transport of ozone (smog) pollution
and one of its main precursors -- NOx -- across State boundaries in the
eastern half of the United States. On October 27, 1998, EPA published a
final rule (the NOx SIP Call) which allowed States 12 months to
develop, adopt, and submit revisions to their State Implementation
Plans (SIPs) to address the transport problem. The Administrator is
required to promulgate a FIP within 2 years of: (1) finding that a
State has failed to make a required submittal or (2) finding that a
submittal is not complete or (3) disapproving a SIP submittal. On June
22, 2000, the D.C. Court of Appeals assigned a new SIP submittal date
of October 30, 2000. Eleven States (Virginia, West Virginia, Alabama,
Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Illinois, Indiana,
Michigan, and Ohio) and the District of Columbia had not submitted
adequate SIPs, as announced in a findings rule published on December
26, 2000. EPA is continuing to work with these States to assist them in
adopting State plans that meet the requirements of the NOx SIP Call; 4
States and D.C. recently submitted fully approvable plans. (Note: The
FIPs discussed here will apply to all elements of the NOx SIP call that
were not remanded to EPA by the court on March 3, 2000. The portions of
the SIP call that were remanded to EPA will be covered under Phase 2
SIPs, and if necessary, separate FIP actions will be prepared for
those.)
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/21/98 63 FR 56393
Findings Rule 12/26/00 65 FR 81366
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4096
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/October/Day-21/a26431.htm Findings
Sectors Affected: 322122 Newsprint Mills; 322121 Paper (except
Newsprint) Mills; 32213 Paperboard Mills; 32211 Pulp Mills; 325998 All
Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product Manufacturing; 325131 Inorganic
Dye and Pigment Manufacturing; 325188 All Other Basic Inorganic
Chemical Manufacturing; 325211 Plastics Material and Resin
Manufacturing; 32511 Petrochemical Manufacturing; 325188 All Other
Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing; 32512 Industrial Gas
Manufacturing; 325199 All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing;
327211 Flat Glass Manufacturing; 327213 Glass Container Manufacturing;
327212 Other Pressed and Blown Glass and Glassware Manufacturing; 32731
Cement Manufacturing; 324199 All Other Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing; 331111 Iron and Steel Mills; 331221 Cold-Rolled Steel
Shape Manufacturing; 33611 Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle
Manufacturing; 333618 Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing; 333415 Air-
Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and
Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing; 221122 Electric Power
Distribution; 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation; 221121
Electric Bulk Power Transmission and Control; 48621 Pipeline
Transportation of Natural Gas; 221122 Electric Power Distribution;
221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation; 221121 Electric Bulk
Power Transmission and Control; 22133 Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply
Agency Contact: Doug Grano, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3292
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: grano.doug@epamail.epa.gov
Jan King, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-15,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5665
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: king.jan@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH87
_______________________________________________________________________
3472. NESHAP: WET-FORMED FIBERGLASS MAT PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, April 1, 2001.
Abstract: The CAA required the EPA to publish an initial list of all
categories of major and area sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs)
listed in section 112(b) of the CAA and to establish and meet dates for
promulgation of emission standards for each of the listed categories of
HAP emissions sources. The wet-formed fiberglass mat production
industry is not included in
[[Page 62301]]
the initial list of categories for standards development but
information available to the Administrator suggests that the industry
is a major source of HAP emissions and, as such, emission standards
shall be developed for this industry. The standards are to be
technology-based and are to require the maximum degree of reduction
determined to be achievable by the Administrator. The EPA has
determined that the wet-formed fiberglass mat production industry may
be reasonably expected to emit one of the pollutants listed in section
112(b) of the CAA. The purpose of this action is to pursue a regulatory
development program such that emission standards may be promulgated for
this industry. Emission standards for this industry were proposed on
May 26, 2000.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/26/00 65 FR 34278
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4082
Agency Contact: Juan Santiago, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1084
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: santiago.juan@epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH89
_______________________________________________________________________
3473. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: RECONSIDERATION ON THE 610
NONESSENTIAL PRODUCTS BAN
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671-7671(q)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82(C)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action extends the current class I ban on the sale and
distribution of nonessential uses of ozone-depleting substances where
sufficient substitutes are already readily available. As part of the
initial 1993 rulemaking, EPA banned the use of ozone-depleting
substances in aerosols, pressurized dispensers, and foams where
substitutes were available. Since that rulemaking was issued, the
phaseout of production and consumption of class I substances has become
effective and the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program
under section 612 has been promulgated. The phaseout of newly
manufactured class I substances and the identification of new
acceptable substitutes for both class I and class II applications
provide compelling reasons to reconsider the initial decisions
regarding both product-specific exemptions and the decision to limit
the ban's effect on major sectors that traditionally used ozone-
depleting substances. Most domestic manufacturers have already
incorporated the non-ozone-depleting substances in their products. The
continued availability and use of ozone-depleting substances in parts
and products manufactured abroad, which are sold or incorporated into
larger products that are then sold into interstate commerce in the
United States, negatively affects the competitiveness of domestic
manufacturers who use substitute substances in their production.
Therefore, it is appropriate to reconsider the applicability of the
class I ban to both specific products and product categories. Amending
these requirements would limit the potential use of ozone-depleting
substances in applications where substitutes are available and thus,
further protect the stratospheric ozone layer.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/14/99 64 FR 21772
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4077
Agency Contact: Cindy Newberg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9729
Fax: 202 565-2095
Email: newberg.cindy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH99
_______________________________________________________________________
3474. REVISION TO THE DEFINITION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC) TO
EXCLUDE TERTIARY BUTYL ACETATE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401-7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100(s)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The definition of VOC is proposed to be revised to add
tertiary butyl acetate to the list of negligibly reactive compounds.
This is a deregulatory action that will remove tertiary butyl acetate
from the necessity to be controlled as a VOC in SIPs for attaining the
ozone standard. This is not expected to have a significant impact on
small businesses or local governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/30/99 64 FR 52731
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4254
Agency Contact: William L. Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5245
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: johnson.williaml@epa.gov
Diane McConkey, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
2344A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5588
Fax: 202 564-5603
Email: mcconkey.diane@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI45
_______________________________________________________________________
3475. REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF STATE
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (GUIDELINE ON AIR QUALITY MODELS)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410 CAAA sec 110(a)(2); CAAA sec 165(e); CAAA
sec 172(a); CAAA sec 172(c); 42 USC
[[Page 62302]]
7601 CAAA sec 301(a)(1); CAAA sec 320
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.112; 40 CFR 51.160; 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action proposes revisions to the Guideline on Air
Quality Models, published as appendix W to 40 CFR part 51. Such models
are used to predict ambient concentrations of pollutants for programs
ranging from Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) to State
Implementation Plans (SIPs) for controlling air pollution sources.
Appendix W to 40 CFR part 51 fulfills a Clean Air Act mandate for EPA
to specify models for air management purposes. This proposed rulemaking
enhances appendix W with new and/or improved techniques.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/21/00 65 FR 21505
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3470
Agency Contact: Tom Coulter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-14, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0832
RIN: 2060-AF01
_______________________________________________________________________
3476. NESHAP: PRIMARY COPPER SMELTING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAAA sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: The primary copper smelting industry is known to emit a
number of the hazardous air pollutants listed in section 112 of the
Clean Air Act. The industry is comprised of seven smelters located in
four states. All have extensive control systems for oxides of sulfur
and HAPs. However, fugitive emissions may cause several smelters to
exceed major source levels.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/20/98 63 FR 19582
NPRM 06/26/00 65 FR 39326
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3340
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/April/Day-20/a10142.htm
Agency Contact: Eugene Crumpler, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0881
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crumpler.eugene@epa.gov
Al Verveart, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE46
_______________________________________________________________________
3477. NESHAP: INTEGRATED IRON AND STEEL
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAAA sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: The Clean Air Act, as amended November 1990, requires the EPA
to regulate categories of major and area sources of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP). The EPA has determined that integrated iron and steel
mills emit several of the 188 HAP listed (including compounds of
chromium, lead, manganese, toluene, and polycyclic organic matter) in
quantities sufficient to designate them as major sources. As a
consequence, integrated iron and steel facilities are among the HAP-
emitting source categories selected for regulation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/13/01 66 FR 36836
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3346
Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5289
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: mulrine.phil@epa.gov
Al Vervaert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE48
_______________________________________________________________________
3478. NESHAP: REINFORCED PLASTIC COMPOSITES PRODUCTION
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: Project is to develop a NESHAP for the source category which
involves the manufacture of composite products involving thermoset
resins and re-enforcements. Some of the specific products in the source
category are tubs/showers, auto/truck parts, appliances, furniture,
piping, construction materials, sporting goods using such materials,
and intermediate compounds such as bulk molding compound and sheet
molding compounds. The most common HAP in the resins used is styrene,
which is present in polyester and vinylester resins as a monomer.
Styrene is listed as a candidate urban area source HAP. So is methylene
chloride, which is sometimes used for cleaning, and xylenes, which may
appear in some mold release formulas. All HAP, except for methylene
chloride, are also VOC's.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/02/01 66 FR 40324
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3326
Agency Contact: Keith Barnett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
[[Page 62303]]
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5605
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: barnett.keith@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE79
_______________________________________________________________________
3479. AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL PROVISIONS SUBPARTS A AND B FOR 40 CFR 63
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112; PL 101-549
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1-15; 40 CFR 63.50-56
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The General Provisions (subpart A) were promulgated on March
16, 1994 (59 FR 12408). The General Provisions create the technical and
administrative framework and establish general procedures and criteria
for implementing MACT standards. On May 16, 1994, six litigants filed
petitions for EPA to review certain provisions of the General
Provisions. Subpart B, the procedures for implementing section 112(j),
was promulgated on May 26, 1994. In June, 1994 litigants filed
petitions for EPA to review the promulgated procedures. As a result of
the litigation, it is anticipated that a number of technical and
administrative amendments to subpart A and B will be proposed.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/23/01 66 FR 16318
NPRM Comment Period End 60 day
period 05/22/01
Final Action 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3551
Agency Contact: Rick Colyer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5262
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: colyer.rick@epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF31
_______________________________________________________________________
3480. NESHAP: PAINT STRIPPING OPERATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: The EPA has determined that paint stripping operations emit
at least one of the HAP's listed in section 112(b) of the Clean Air
Act. As a result, the source category was included on the initial list
of HAP-emitting categories scheduled for promulgation within 10 years
of enactment of the Act. There are several emission standards for other
source categories (for example, aerospace manufacturing and wood
furniture manufacturing) that already address emissions from paint
stripping operations. We are currently in the process of determining if
there are any other major sources of HAP emissions from paint stripping
operations that are not already regulated. Furthermore, HAP emissions
from paint stripping operations that are area sources will be regulated
in the future as part of the urban air toxics strategy.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3746
This action being addressed under SAN 3825, RIN 2060-AG56.
Agency Contact: Jaime Pagan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5340
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: pagan.jaime@epa.gov
Susan Wyatt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5674
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: wyatt.susan@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG26
_______________________________________________________________________
3481. NESHAP: TIRE MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This is a 10-year MACT covering the HAP emissions from the
manufacturing of Rubber tires. The emission sources associated with the
rubber compound mixing (banbury); extruding calendaring; building;
curing and finishing are covered in this MACT. Forty-one facilities
have been initially identified. This includes approximately 35
facilities of at least 10 tpy and 26 facilities of at least 25 tpy.
Emissions are primarily associated with rubber processing and the use
of HAP-bearing solvent and cements. Several facilities have eliminated
through substitution much of the HAP-bearing solvent and cements.
However, evaluation of the MACT and separation of the rubber processing
emissions from HAP-bearing solvents and cement will reduce the number
of affected facilities to about 30. In addition, the tire cord coating
operations will also be included. Typically these facilities are
separate non-colocated operations. The major pollutant associated with
tire cord is formaldehyde. There are approximately 12 affected major
facilities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/18/00 65 FR 62414
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3749
Agency Contact: Tony Wayne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
[[Page 62304]]
Phone: 919 541-5439
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: wayne.tony@epa.gov
Susan Wyatt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5674
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: wyatt.susan@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG29
_______________________________________________________________________
3482. NESHAP: LARGE APPLIANCE (SURFACE COATING)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This regulation will apply to surface coating of large
appliance products and parts. This regulation will reduce nationwide
emissions of HAPs from surface coating of large appliances, a measure
required by section 112 of the Clean Air Act.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/22/00 65 FR 81133
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3823
Sectors Affected: 335222 Household Refrigerator and Home Freezer
Manufacturing; 335221 Household Cooking Appliance Manufacturing; 335228
Other Major Household Appliance Manufacturing; 336391 Motor Vehicle
Air-Conditioning Manufacturing; 333415 Air-Conditioning and Warm Air
Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment
Manufacturing; 333319 Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery
Manufacturing; 335212 Household Vacuum Cleaner Manufacturing; 333298
All Other Industrial Machinery Manufacturing; 335224 Household Laundry
Equipment Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Lynn Dail, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2363
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: dail.lynn@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG54
_______________________________________________________________________
3483. NESHAP: METAL COIL (SURFACE COATING) INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This action will result in the reduction of hazardous air
pollutants emitted by the metal coil surface coating industry. The
Agency will study what pollutants are emitted and evaluate the control
techniques, including pollution prevention, that are used to reduce
these emissions. The Agency will also determine what, if any, impact
the rule would have on small businesses.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/18/00 65 FR 44616
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3905
Agency Contact: Rhea Jones, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: jones.rhea@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG97
_______________________________________________________________________
3484. NESHAP: LEATHER FINISHING OPERATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: Title III of the Clean Air Act requires EPA to develop air
emission standards for facilities that emit any of the 189 hazardous
air pollutants. This action will develop a MACT standard for sources
involved in leather finishing operations. Facilities involved in these
operations release over 1.7 million pounds of hazardous air pollutants
per year. Regulation of these facilities will result in a reduction of
the emissions of hazardous air pollutants, several of which are highly
toxic.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/02/00 65 FR 58702
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3964
Sectors Affected: 31611 Leather and Hide Tanning and Finishing
Agency Contact: Bill Schrock, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5032
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: schrock.bill@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH17
_______________________________________________________________________
3485. IMPORTATION OF NONCONFORMING VEHICLES; AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7522 CAA sec 203; 42 USC 7525 CAA sec 206; 42
USC 7541 CAA sec 207; 42 USC 7542 CAA sec 208; 42 USC 7601 CAA sec 301;
42 USC 7522 CAA sec 203; 42 USC 7550 CAA sec 216; 42 USC 7601 CAA sec
301
[[Page 62305]]
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 85
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will amend the regulations in 40 CFR part 85,
subpart P to allow entry into the United States of vehicles which are
originally sold in Canada and which are identical to their U.S.
counterparts, without obtaining a certificate of conformity from EPA.
This action is in response to a petition for review of import rules.
The final rule also will address certain other issues in part 85,
subpart P and subpart R, including: (1) formalizing a long-standing EPA
policy regarding the importation of owned vehicles that are proven to
be identical to a vehicle certified for sale in the United States (2)
establishing new emission standards applicable to imported
nonconforming vehicles; (3) clarifying the regulatory language that
concerns exclusions and exemptions from meeting Federal emission
requirements; and (4) providing several minor clarifications to the
existing regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/24/94 59 FR 13912
Supplemental NPRM 02/12/96 61 FR 5840
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2665
Agency Contact: Len Lazarus, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6405J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9281
RIN: 2060-AI03
_______________________________________________________________________
3486. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: SUPPLEMENTAL RULE REGARDING A
RECYCLING STANDARD UNDER SECTION 608
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq CAA sec 608
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 subpart F
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will amend the recordkeeping aspects of the
technician certification program, clarify aspects of a sales
restriction, and adopt an updated version of ARI standard 740. The rule
will also clarify the distinction between major and non-major repairs
and amend several definitions including small appliances. The rule also
addresses the transfers of unreclaimed refrigerant between majority-
owned and majority-controlled subsidiaries.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 1 02/29/96 61 FR 7858
NPRM 11/01/96 61 FR 56493
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3556
Additional SANs 3895, 3896. This rule will address a potential adoption
of a more flexible method for cleaning refrigerants for refrigerant
transferred between appliances with different ownership with a
potential adoption of a 3rd party certification program for labs.
Agency Contact: Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9870
Fax: 202 565-2095
Email: banks.julius@epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9185
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: land.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF36
_______________________________________________________________________
3487. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: REFRIGERANT RECYCLING RULE
AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE SUBSTITUTE REFRIGERANTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq; 42 USC 7671(g) CAA sec 608
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82(F)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would facilitate fulfillment of the statutory
mandate to apply the venting prohibition to substitute refrigerants.
The action would provide regulations covering recovery/recycling
equipment, recovery/recycling practices, and applicable certifications
that would be required to accomplish compliance with the venting
prohibition. Requirements would parallel those of the current section
608 regulations, expanding applicability, where appropriate, to
substitute refrigerants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/11/98 63 FR 32044
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3560
NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/June/Day-11/a15003.htm
Agency Contact: Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9870
Fax: 202 565-2095
Email: banks.julius@epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9185
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: land.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF37
_______________________________________________________________________
3488. PAPER AND OTHER WEB COATING NESHAP
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59; 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: This action would result in the reduction of hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) emitted by the paper and other web coating
industries. The Agency will study the various HAP and VOC pollutants
emitted by the industry and will evaluate pollution prevention and
control techniques which can reduce these emissions.
[[Page 62306]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/13/00 65 FR 55332
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3827
Sectors Affected: 322211 Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing;
322212 Folding Paperboard Box Manufacturing; 322221 Coated and
Laminated Packaging Paper and Plastics Film Manufacturing; 322222
Coated and Laminated Paper Manufacturing; 322223 Plastics, Foil, and
Coated Paper Bag Manufacturing; 323111 Commercial Gravure Printing;
323116 Manifold Business Form Printing
Agency Contact: Paul Almodovar, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0283
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: almodovar.paul@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG58
_______________________________________________________________________
3489. SOURCE-SPECIFIC FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR NAVAJO GENERATING
STATION; NAVAJO NATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 49 CFR 123
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA proposes to federalize standards from the Arizona and New
Mexico State Implementation Plans (SIPS) applicable to the Navajo
generating station. Where necessary, EPA's proposed emission standards
modify the standards extracted from the States' regulatory programs to
ensure comprehensive emission control and Federal consistency.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/08/99 64 FR 48725
Notice 01/26/00 65 FR 4244
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4315
Formerly listed as RIN 2060-AI79
Agency Contact: Douglas McDaniel, Environmental Protection Agency,
Regional Office San Francisco, Region 9, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901
Phone: 415 744-1246
Colleen McKaughan, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office San
Francisco
Phone: 520 498-0118
RIN: 2009-AA00
_______________________________________________________________________
3490. NESHAP: GENERIC MACT FOR CARBON BLACK, ETHYLENE, CYNAIDE AND
SPANDEX
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 1, 2001.
Abstract: Several of the source categories that are subject to MACT
(maximum achievable control technology) standards contain only a few
sources (e.g., less than five). For such categories, EPA plans to
develop a generic MACT standard for these source categories. Given the
relatively few affected sources caught by the generic standard, the
overall cost and environmental effects of this action are expected to
be small, nationally.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/06/00 65 FR 76408
Final Action 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4105
Sectors Affected: 325182 Carbon Black Manufacturing; 325188 All Other
Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mark Morris, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5416
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: morris.mark@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH68
_______________________________________________________________________
3491. NESHAP FOR ETHYLENE OXIDE COMMERCIAL STERILIZATION OPERATIONS-
MONITORING AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The proposed amendments will correct technical problems
associated with both the emission limits (because of safety issues) and
the compliance testing and monitoring requirements.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/06/01 66 FR 13464
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4316
Agency Contact: David Markwordt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0837
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: markwordt.david@epa.gov
Susan Wyatt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5674
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: wyatt.susan@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI64
[[Page 62307]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3492. PETITIONS TO DELIST HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (E.G., MEK, EGBE,
METHANOL, AND MIBK) FROM SECTION 112(B)(1) OF THE CAA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Section 112(b)(3)
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, February 28, 2000.
Abstract: The Agency has received 4 petitions to remove certain
pollutants (i.e., methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethylene glycol butyl
ether, and methyl isobutyl ketone) from the list of hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) under Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act. The Agency
must review the petitions and either grant or deny the petition within
18 months of the date the complete petition was received. If the Agency
grants a petition, a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in
the Federal Register, allowing the opportunity for public comment. If
the Agency denies a petition, a notice of denial will be published in
the Federal Register providing an explanation for such denial. If the
Agency grants a petition and ultimately removes the pollutant from the
HAP list then sources emitting such pollutants would not be required to
meet MACT emissions standards for the pollutant. If on the other hand,
the Agency denies the petition, then MACT standards would be issued as
currently planned under Section 112(c) and 112(d) of the Clean Air Act
for sources emitting such pollutants. Depending on the 4 individual
determinations, the Agency will issue separate notices for each.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Denial Notice: Methanol Petition
-- Final Action 05/02/01 66 FR 21929
Final Actions on the Other 3
Petitions Are Expected by This
Date 07/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4313
Agency Contact: Chuck French, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0467
Email: french.chuck@epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, RTP, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5368
RIN: 2060-AI72
_______________________________________________________________________
3493. AMEND SUBPART H AND I, 40 CFR PART 61, FOR EMISSIONS OF
RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN RADON FROM DOE FACILITIES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAAA 112(g) (q); PL 95-95
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61.93(a); 40 CFR 61.93(b)(2)(ii)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Subparts H and I of 40 CFR part 61 establish limits, under
the Clean Air Act, for radionuclide emissions (other than radon) from
Department of Energy (DOE) and other non-DOE federal facilities. These
Subparts require emission sampling, monitoring, and calculations to
identify compliance with the standard. The current air sampling
methodology required by the standards is embodied in ANSI-N13.1-1969, a
consensus guidance document that is incorporated by reference in EPA's
standards. That guidance was updated in 1999, and contains new
technical recommendations (that differ from the 1969 version) for
obtaining representative air samples. In this rule, EPA is updating
subparts H and I to incorporate the new sampling guidance, ANSI-N13.1-
1999, and require its use for new facilities and for those undergoing
significant changes to ventilation systems. Existing facilities will be
allowed to continue sampling in accordance with the current
requirements.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/09/00 65 FR 29934
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4273
Agency Contact: Robin Anderson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9385
Fax: 202 565-2065
Email: anderson.robin@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI90
_______________________________________________________________________
3494. REVISION TO METHOD 24 FOR ELECTRICAL INSULATING VARNISHES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401; 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7416; 42
USC 7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The purpose of this action is to revise Method 24 to allow
the use of American Society for Testing and Materials' Method D6053-96
to measure the volatile organic content of electrical insulating
varnishes. Method 24 as currently written is not applicable to these
types of coatings. This action will ensure consistency in testing these
coatings for determining compliance with current regulations. We do not
anticipate any impact on small business or State/local/tribal
governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4299
Agency Contact: Candace B. Sorrell, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-1064
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: sorrell.candace@epa.gov
Bill Lamason, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
19, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5374
RIN: 2060-AI94
_______________________________________________________________________
3495. NESHAP FOR FLEXIBLE POLYURETHANE FOAM FABRICATION OPERATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 41 USC 7401 et seq
[[Page 62308]]
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000.
Abstract: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires development of emission
standards for major sources emitting any of the hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) listed in section 112(b) of the CAA. The EPA is
proposing a rule to reduce emissions of toxic air pollutants from
flexible polyurethane foam fabrication operations. Toxic air
pollutants, or air toxics, are those pollutants known, or suspected, to
cause cancer and other serious health problems. This proposal focuses
on reducing air toxics emitted from two foam fabrication emission
sources: 1) loop slitter adhesive use, which includes processes that
use adhesives to bond foam to foam or to other substrates (i.e., cloth,
foam, plastic, and other materials) using scorched or melted foam.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/08/01 66 FR 41718
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4449
Agency Contact: Maria Noell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5607
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: noell.maria@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ19
_______________________________________________________________________
3496. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: PHASEOUT OF CHLOROBROMOMETHANE
(HALON 1011) PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 31, 2001, See additional
information.
Abstract: EPA is amending its regulations for the production and import
of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs). Through this action, EPA
implements certain amendments made in 1999 (Beijing Amendments) to the
Montreal Protocol (Protocol). This action implements the elements of
the Beijing Amendments that add control measures for the chemical
chlorobromomethane (CBM). Consistent with the Beijing Amendments, this
action adds CBM to the list of substances addressed by production and
consumption controls of both the Montreal Protocol and EPA's
regulations under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA). The
action creates a new group of class I substances, places CBM in this
new group, and, consistent with the Beijing Amendments, designates the
value of CBM's ``ozone depleting potential'' (ODP) as 0.12. This action
establishes a phaseout of CBM production and import to be effective as
of January 1, 2002. No allowances for production of CBM to meet ``basic
domestic needs'' of Article 5 countries are provided in this action.
Consistent with the Beijing Amendments, the action also bans trade in
CBM with countries which are not parties to or in compliance with the
Beijing Amendments. This action imposes recordkeeping and reporting
requirements associated with production, import, export, destruction,
transhipment, essential uses and feedstock uses of CBM, but these
requirements would not become effective until EPA's information
collection request has been finalized. The ban does not apply to CBM
production for use as a feedstock or for destruction. The ban also does
not apply to CBM imports for use as a feedstock or for destruction, or
to CBM imports of transhipments and heels, as long as those imports are
from countries that are a party to or in compliance with the Beijing
Amendments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4428
Statutory Legal Description: The Montreal Protocol as amended (1999)
requires CBM to be phased out beginning 1/1/02. Therefore the U.S.
intends to issue a direct final rule by 12/31/01.
Sectors Affected: 115114 Postharvest Crop Activities (except Cotton
Ginning); 3112 Grain and Oilseed Milling; 322 Paper Manufacturing; 325
Chemical Manufacturing; 3333 Commercial and Service Industry Machinery
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Lisa Chang, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9742
Fax: 202 565-2096
Email: chang.lisa@epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9185
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: land.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ27
_______________________________________________________________________
3497. NESHAP FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES: PHOSPHORIC ACID MANUFACTURING AND
PHOSPHATE FERTILIZERS PRODUCTION -- AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: PL 101-549 sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subparts AA to BB
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The rules are being amended to resolve specific issues and
questions raised after promulgation. The changes do not change the
projections for environmental benefits, compliance costs, burden on
industry, or the number of affected facilities. There are no impacts on
small businesses, State, local, or tribal governments. These amendments
do not raise any cross-media issues.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
[[Page 62309]]
Additional Information: SAN No. 4442
Agency Contact: Tanya Medley, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5422
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: medley.tanya@epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ29
_______________________________________________________________________
3498. GUIDELINES FOR BEST AVAILABLE RETROFIT TECHNOLOGY (BART)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7421; 42 USC 7470 to
7479; 42 USC 7491; 42 USC 7492; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7602
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.308(e)(1); 40 CFR 51 app Y (New)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: To meet the Clean Air Act's requirements, final regional haze
regulations were published in the Federal Register on July 1, 1999 (64
FR 35714). These regulations include, in section 51.308(e), a
requirement for best available retrofit technology (BART) for certain
types of existing stationary sources of air pollutants. In the preamble
to regional haze rule, we committed to issuing further guidelines to
clarify the BART requirements. The purpose of this rulemaking is to
provide those BART guidelines.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/20/01 66 FR 38108
Final Action 07/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4450
Agency Contact: Tim Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD 15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4718
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: smith.tim@epa.gov
Rich Damberg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-15
Phone: 919 541-5592
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: damberg.rich@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ31
_______________________________________________________________________
3499. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES: MUNICIPAL
SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS: AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401; 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7416; 42
USC 7429; 42 USC 7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60.750; 40 CFR 60.751; 40 CFR
60.752(b)(2)(iii)(B); 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2)(iii)(C); 40 CFR
60.752(b)(2)(iii)(D); 40 CFR 60758
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will amend the existing regulation entitled
Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills, subpart WWW of 40 CFR Part 60, promulgated on March
12, 1996. The amendment is being undertaken in response to requests to
clarify our intent regarding what constitutes an adequate landfill gas
treatment system. This action also clarifies our intent to exempt from
control landfill gas that is treated/upgraded to pipeline quality
natural gas. Furthermore, it clarifies who is responsible for control
of untreated landfill gas that is sold. This action is necessary to
clarify our intent regarding the issues discussed above. It will
improve implementation and compliance with this regulation. There are
no internal issues involved with the proposed amendment, and we
anticipate no significant adverse reaction related to this action from
regulators or environmentalists. Industry may comment on the landfill
gas treatment language but in general supports the amendments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action NSPS: Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4478
Sectors Affected: 562212 Solid Waste Landfill
Agency Contact: Michele Laur, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5256
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: laur.michele@epa.gov
K.C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ41
_______________________________________________________________________
3500. REVISIONS TO THE PART 97 FEDERAL NOX BUDGET TRADING PROGRAM, THE
PART 75 EMISSIONS MONITORING PROVISIONS, THE PART 72 PERMITS REGULATION
PROVISIONS, AND THE PART 78 APPEAL PROCEDURES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7651 et seq; 42 USC 7401; 42 USC
7403:; 42 USC 7426
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 75 (Revision); 40 CFR 97 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The purpose of these proposed revisions is to modify existing
procedures for monitoring and reporting NOx and SO2 emissions for
sources affected by the Acid Rain Program, the Federal NOx Budget
Trading Program, and the October 27, 1998 NOx SIP call. The proposed
changes will: streamline part 75 by removing outdated provisions and
give electricity generators added flexibility with the monitoring and
reporting requirements; tighten the calibration error limit for some
units to be more in line with industry's current accepted technical
specifications; make technical corrections and changes necessary to
correct printing, typographical, and grammatical errors in existing
rules; and correct/clarify cross references between the subject Parts
to ensure consistency among the rules.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/13/01 66 FR 31978
Final Action 12/00/01
[[Page 62310]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4538
Split from RIN 2060-AJ30.
Sectors Affected: 221111 Hydroelectric Power Generation
Agency Contact: Gabrielle Stevens, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6204N
Phone: 202 564-2681
Email: stevens.gabrielle@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ43
_______________________________________________________________________
3501. FEDERAL PLAN FOR SMALL MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION UNITS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act; sections 111(d)
129 and 301(a)(d)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 62 (New)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 directed the EPA to set
emission guidelines for existing municipal waste combustion units
(MWCs) under sections 111 and 129. On 12/19/95, the EPA adopted
emission guidelines for MWCs under the authority of sections 111(d) and
129 of the Clean Air Act. These emission guidelines covered all MWC
units located at plants with an aggregate plant combustion capacity
larger than 35 tons per day of municipal solid waste. Subsequent
litigation cancelled the emission guidelines for small MWC units, but
the Court directed EPA to adopt a new rule for small MWC units. This
rule was adopted on December 6, 2000. This action is a follow-on
activity to this rulemaking. In this proposed MWC Federal Plan for
small units, EPA becomes the implementing authority in those instances
where the state or local agency fails to submit a plan or a plan has
not yet been approved. This action makes no changes to the rule and is
intended to fulfill EPA's duty under pection 129(b)(3) to promulgate a
Federal Plan as a gap-filling measure until the State fulfills its
statutory obligations. When the State submits an approvable State plan,
the Federal plan will no longer apply to units in the State.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/14/01 66 FR 32484
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 4454
About half the small municpal waste combustor owners are local
governments.
Agency Contact: Lalit Banker, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5420
Fax: 919 541-2664
Email: banker.lalit@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ46
_______________________________________________________________________
3502. SECTION 126 RULE REVISION CORRECTING NOX ALLOWANCE ALLOCATIONS FOR
CERTAIN UNITS IN THE FEDERAL NOX BUDGET TRADING PROGRAM
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401; 42 USC 7403; 42 USC 4726; 42 USC 7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 95.42(g)(2); 40 CFR 97.43(c)(9)(new); 40 CFR
97.43(a)
Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, September 15, 2001, Deadline for
signing of final rule under settlements of litigation.
Abstract: These rule revisions will correct NOx allowance allocations
for certain units in the Federal NOx Budget Trading Program under
section 126 of the Clean Air Act. Most of the corrections are under
settlement agreements between EPA and owners of the units. The rule
revisions also propose to authorize the Administrator to make similar
corrections in the future by order, rather than by rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/21/00 65 FR 80398
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4491
Agency Contact: Dwight C. Alpern, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6204J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9151
Fax: 202 564-2141
Email: alpern.dwight@epa.gov
Kevin Culligan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6204J
Phone: 202 564-9172
Fax: 202 564-2141
Email: culligan.kevin@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ47
_______________________________________________________________________
3503. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW SOURCES AND EMISSION GUIDELINES
FOR EXISTING SOURCES: LARGE MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTORS AMENDMENT OF
STARTUP, SHUTDOWN, AND MALFUNCTION PROVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7429
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This direct final action will amend the provisions limiting
startup, shutdown, and malfunction to 3 hours per occurrence to provide
more time for shutdown as a result of specific malfunctions (i.e.,
waterwall tube failure, grate failure, and combustion air fan failure).
This is a narrow technical amendment responding to new information that
came in after the original rule was promulgated.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4507
Agency Contact: Fred Porter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5251
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: porter.fred@epa.gov
Bob Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
[[Page 62311]]
Phone: 919 541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ52
_______________________________________________________________________
3504. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES: VOLATILE
ORGANIC LIQUID STORAGE VESSELS; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401; 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7416; 42
USC 7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This direct final action revises existing standards for
Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid
Storage Vessels) by amending the storage vessel volume applicability
criteria and adding a vapor pressure applicability criterion. This is a
narrow technical amendment responding to new information that came in
after the original rule was promulgated.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4508
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 324 Petroleum and Coal
Products Manufacturing; 42271 Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals
Agency Contact: Mark Morris, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5416
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: morris.mark@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ53
_______________________________________________________________________
3505. MODIFICATION OF THE ANTI-DUMPING BASELINE DATE CUT-OFF LIMIT FOR
DATA USED IN DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL BASELINE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(l); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC
7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91(b)(1)(i); 40 CFR 80.93(a)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The goal of the anti-dumping program is to maintain gasoline
quality throughout the country. Without the program, as refiners
produce cleaner, reformulated gasoline for certain localities under the
Clean Air Act, they could take the chemicals removed and ``dump'' them
into supplies of ``ordinary'' non-reformulated gasoline as a cost-
saving measure. The anti-dumping program prohibits this. This rule
amends the existing anti-dumping program to accommodate certain
refiners with unusual data problems.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4528
Agency Contact: Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4051
Email: brunner.christine@epa.gov
Patrice Simms, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
2344, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5593
Fax: 202 564-5603
Email: simms.patrice@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ59
_______________________________________________________________________
3506. CHANGE IN THE DEFINITION OF MAJOR SOURCE FOR OPERATING PERMITS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70.2
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would remove the requirement for sources to count
fugitive emissions (such as equipment leaks) when determining major
source status if they are in categories subject to standards under
section 111 or 112 promulgated after August 7, 1980. Making this change
removes impediments to full approval of permit programs in several
States and facilitates compliance with a settlement agreement with
environmental groups. This action was proposed in 1994 and reproposed
in 1995, after which work was stopped due to other priorities. It is
now being re-tiered because so much time has elapsed since proposal.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/29/94 59 FR 44460
NPRM 08/31/95 60 FR 45529
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4529
Agency Contact: Ray Vogel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3153
Email: vogel.ray@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ60
_______________________________________________________________________
3507. CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FROM MOBILE
SOURCES; CORRECTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(l); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC
7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.81(a)(1)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule corrects a final regulatory action which was
published in the Federal Register on March 29, 2001 (66 FR 17230). The
correction consists of restoring a paragraph that was inadvertently
omitted when the final rule was published.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4554
[[Page 62312]]
Agency Contact: Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4051
Email: brunner.christine@epa.gov
Paul Cort, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation
Phone: 202 564-5573
Fax: 202 564-5603
Email: cort.paul@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ67
_______________________________________________________________________
3508. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM NEW MOTOR VEHICLES;
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE TIER 2/GASOLINE SULFUR REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a); 42 USC 7401
to 7521(l); 42 USC 7521(m) to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80; 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This direct final rule (and concurrent proposal) corrects,
amends, and revises certain provisions of the Tier 2/Gasoline Sulfur
regulations to assist regulated entities with program implementation
and compliance. First, it makes minor corrections to clarify the
regulations governing compliance with the gasoline sulfur standards.
Second, with respect to the low sulfur gasoline program, it removes the
anti-backsliding provision of the Geographic Phase-in Area (GPA)
program by establishing a flat GPA gasoline standard of 150 ppm sulfur.
Third, it amends certain provisions of the Averaging, Banking, and
Trading (ABT) programs to assist domestic and foreign refiners and
importers in generating sulfur credits and allotments. Fourth, it
clarifies and amends certain downstream standards for parties in the
gasoline distribution system to assist them with program compliance.
Finally, today's action makes minor revisions to the regulations
governing compliance with the vehicle standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule and Concurrent
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4569
Sectors Affected: 336111 Automobile Manufacturing; 336112 Light Truck
and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mary Manners, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, ASD, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4873
Fax: 734 214-4051
Email: manners.mary@epa.gov
Robin Moran, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, ASD
Phone: 734 214-4781
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: moran.robin@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ71
_______________________________________________________________________
3509. MODIFICATION OF THE ANTI-DUMPING BASELINE DATE CUT-OFF
LIMIT FOR DATA USED IN DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL BASELINE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(1); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC
7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91(b)(1)(i); 40 CFR 80.93(a)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: ``Dumping'' refers to the practice whereby refiners making
clean fuels for certain markets (such as reformulated gasoline for
clean-air purposes) take the pollutants removed from the clean fuels
and ``dump'' them into other fuels they are producing for other
markets. This, if allowed, would make those other fuels even dirtier
than before, and so the Clean Air Act prohibits this practice. EPA has
existing ``anti-dumping'' rules on the books that codify this Clean Air
Act prohibition. This regulation is a minor technical amendment to
those existing regulations. It would amend a portion of those
regulations to allow the use of data collected after January 1, 1995 in
the development of baselines, and it would establish a cut-off date of
January 1, 2002 for the submission of all individual baselines under
the anti-dumping program. This date is the same as that allowed for
foreign refineries seeking a unique individual baseline under the anti-
dumping program.)
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4604
Agency Contact: Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4051
Email: brunner.christine@epa.gov
Patrice Simms, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
2344, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5593
Fax: 202 564-5603
Email: simms.patrice@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ82
_______________________________________________________________________
3510. COMPILATION OF SOURCE-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVE METHODS
BEING APPROVED FOR SOURCE-CATEGORY WIDE APPLICATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Sources have applied for approval of alternative test methods
for use at their facility. The Agency has approved these methods and
issued letters of approval to each requestor. The Agency has determined
that these methods could be used at similar sources, thus giving those
sources an alternative test method to the one cited in the regulation.
This action seeks to publish these facility-specific approvals in order
to provide other facilities within the source category the option of
using the alternative method.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4548
Agency Contact: Rima Howell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-0443
Fax: 919 541-1039
[[Page 62313]]
Email: howell.rima@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ84
_______________________________________________________________________
3511. STATE AND FEDERAL OPERATING PERMITS PROGRAM: REMOVAL OF
AMENDMENTS TO PART 70 AND PART 71 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414a; 42 USC 7661 to 7661f
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71 (Revisions)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Action is in response to the October 29, 1999, United States
Circuit Court of Appeals decision to remand to EPA part of the October
22, 1997, Compliance Assurance Monitoring rulemaking that included
revisions to parts 70 and 71 compliance certification requirements. The
Court ruled that the compliance certification must address whether the
affected facility has been in continuous or intermittent compliance.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4600
Split from RIN 2060-AJ04
Agency Contact: Peter Westlin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-1058
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: westlin.peter@epa.gov
Barrett Parker, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, EN-
341W, MD-19
Phone: 919 541-5635
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: parker.barrett@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ89
_______________________________________________________________________
3512. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR ANDERSEN CORPORATION'S
FACILITY IN BAYPORT, MINNESOTA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 740 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The proposed rule would implement a project under the Project
XL program for the Andersen Corporation facility located in Bayport,
Minnesota. The terms of the project are defined in a draft Final
Project Agreement (FPA) which is being made available for public review
and comment by the Federal Register notice. The proposed site-specific
rule, applicable only to the Andersen Bayport facility, would
facilitate implementation of the project. Through the notice, EPA
solicits comment on the proposed rule, the draft FPA, and the project
generally. The proposed site-specific rule is intended to provide
regulatory changes under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) to
implement Andersen's XL project, which will result in superior
environmental performance and, at the same time, provide Andersen with
greater operational flexibility. The proposed site-specific rule would
change some of the CAA requirements which apply to the Andersen Bayport
facility for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program,
in particular existing synthetic minor limits that apply to some VOC
sources in the Bayport facility. Synthetic minor limits are operational
and control limitations which serve to limit the net emissions increase
associated with proposed new or modified units or systems to less than
the applicable significance level and thereby keep them out of PSD
review.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/19/99 64 FR 19097
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4278
Agency Contact: Nancy Birnbaum, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1802, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2601
Fax: 202 401-6637
Email: birnbaum.nancy@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA21
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3513. REVISED PERMIT REVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE FEDERAL OPERATING
PERMITS PROGRAM
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7661(a)(d)(3)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 71.7
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The proposed regulatory change would streamline permit
revisions procedures for stationary air sources that are subject to the
Federal operating permits program.
The Agency does not anticipate any significant impact on small
businesses and State/local/tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/04
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3922
Agency Contact: Scott Voorhees, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5348
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: voorhees.scott@epa.gov
Steve Hitte, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-12,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0886
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hitte.steve@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG92
[[Page 62314]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3514. ADDITION OF OPACITY METHOD TO APPENDIX M OF 40 CFR PART 51 (METHOD
203)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 15, 2001.
Abstract: This rulemaking proposes to add a method, Method 203, for the
measurement of opacity from stationary sources, to appendix M (Example
Test Methods for State Implementation Plans) in 40 CFR part 51. This
action provides States with an instrumental test method which can be
used in determining, on a continuous basis, compliance with stationary
source opacity emission limitations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/07/92 57 FR 46114
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3958
Agency Contact: Solomon Ricks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5242
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: ricks.solomon@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH23
_______________________________________________________________________
3515. REVIEW OF MINOR NEW SOURCES AND MODIFICATIONS IN INDIAN COUNTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: As required by the Clean Air Act's New Source Review (NSR)
provisions, the EPA is proposing Federal regulations governing
preconstruction permitting of minor and major stationary sources of air
pollution in Indian country. Pursuant to the Tribal Air Rule, eligible
Indian tribes may receive EPA authorization to develop and implement
such programs. The Federal NSR permitting programs would be effective
throughout Indian country and would be implemented by EPA if eligible
Indian tribes do not elect, or do not receive authorization, to manage
such programs. The proposed Federal minor NSR rule would require
sources in Indian country, with certain exceptions, to obtain a permit
prior to construction if they are: (1) new minor sources, (2) existing
minor sources undergoing modification, or (3) existing major sources
undergoing minor modification. The proposed rule also would allow new
or existing stationary sources to accept enforceable limits on their
production capacity or hours of operation in order to be considered
minor sources and avoid being subject to other Clean Air Act
requirements such as the title V operating permit program. The proposed
Federal major NSR rule would require sources in nonattainment areas in
Indian country to obtain a permit prior to construction if they are:
(1) new major sources, or (2) existing major sources undergoing major
modification. These rules would not impose any mandates on tribal
governments to implement NSR permitting programs. Tribal governments
may be affected, however, insofar as they own or operate sources that
must obtain a permit from the EPA under the final Federal permitting
program regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/02
Final Action 11/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3975
Agency Contact: Karen Blanchard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5503
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: blanchard.karen@epa.gov
Sara Terry, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-11,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7576
Fax: 919 541-7925
Email: terry.sara@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH37
_______________________________________________________________________
3516. FEDERAL MAJOR NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM FOR NONATTAINMENT
AREAS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 51.165; 40 CFR 52.10; 40 CFR 52.24
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Clean Air Act (Act) (title I, part D) requires that
construction permit programs for new or modified major stationary
sources of air pollution be established for areas not attaining the
NAAQS. This action will add Federal rules at 40 CFR 52.10 for
permitting the construction of new or modified major stationary sources
in certain nonattainment areas where State, local, or tribal rules in
whole or in part are not in place that meet the statutory permitting
requirements. These rules will basically incorporate the requirements
for State nonattainment NSR permit programs, codified at 40 CFR
51.165(a), with supplemental provisions added to make explicit the
permit requirements of section 173 of the Act and certain long-standing
policies regarding nonattainment NSR permitting. This action will also
change 40 CFR 52.24 to specify that the requirements of 40 CFR 52.10
govern any permits issued in certain nonattainment areas where
acceptable nonattainment NSR rules are not in place. Changes to 40 CFR
part 124 will specify that the permit processing, public participation,
and permit appeal requirements that otherwise apply to Federal PSD
permitting will also apply, in most cases, to Federal nonattainment NSR
permitting under 40 CFR 52.10.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/03
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4046
[[Page 62315]]
Agency Contact: Dave Svendsgaard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-12, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2380
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: svendsgaard.dave@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH53
_______________________________________________________________________
3517. GENERAL CONFORMITY REGULATIONS; REVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401-7671
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.850 to 51.860; 40 CFR 93.150 to 93.160
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act prohibits Federal
entities from taking actions which do not conform to the State
implementation plan (SIP) for the attainment and maintenance of the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). In November 1993, EPA
promulgated two sets of regulations to implement section 176(c). First,
on November 24, EPA promulgated the Transportation Conformity
Regulations to establish the criteria and procedures for determining
that transportation plans, programs, and projects which are funded
under title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Act conform with the SIP.
Then, on November 30, EPA promulgated regulations, known as the General
Conformity Regulations, to ensure that other Federal actions also
conformed to the SIPs. Since 1993, EPA has amended the transportation
conformity rule three times in response to stakeholders' requests. The
EPA is working on a separate revision to address transportation
conformity in transitional areas which will be final by December 1998.
The EPA has not reviewed or revised the General Conformity Regulations
since their 1993 promulgation. Several Federal agencies have identified
concerns over the implementation of the General Conformity Regulations,
including the requirements for areas designated nonattainment for the
newly promulgated NAAQS. In conjunction with an ad hoc work group of
representatives from several Federal agencies, EPA will review the
implementation of the General Conformity Regulations. The EPA will then
propose and promulgate any appropriate revision to those regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4070
Agency Contact: Annie Nikbakht, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5246
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: nikbakht.annie@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH93
_______________________________________________________________________
3518. REVISIONS TO AIR POLLUTION EMERGENCY EPISODE REQUIREMENTS (SUBPART
H, 40 CFR PART 51)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410(a)(2)(G); 42 USC 7603
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 app L; 40 CFR 51.150 to 51.153
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: 40 CFR part 51.150-51.153 require States to have contingency
plans to prevent air pollution levels from reaching the significant
harm level (SHL) for CO, O3, SO2, NOx, and PM. Appendix L provides
example guidance to the States on appropriate courses of action to take
at each episode stage (i.e., alert, warning, and emergency) to ensure
the SHL is not reached. These requirements were developed in the
1970's, based on the NAAQS from that era. Since that time, ambient air
quality levels have decreased nationwide. Today, many areas/sources
that no longer need episode plans must still develop them. This rule
would update and simplify the criteria used to determine which areas
would require episode plans. Areas with no more than one exceedance of
the Alert level over the past 5 years would not need to develop
emergency episode plans. Sources with the potential to cause
exceedances of the SHL due to a process/control equipment malfunction
would need to develop source contingency plans to prevent (and to
respond to) such malfunctions. Appendix L would also be revised to
reflect the revised program requirements. The result will be a
sensible, credible program replacing an outdated program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4247
Agency Contact: Tom Helms, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5527
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: helms.tom@epa.gov
John Silvasi, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5666
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: silvasi.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI47
_______________________________________________________________________
3519. REVISION OF EPA'S RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: EO 12777; PL 96-295 Sec 304
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Radiological
Emergency Response Plan (RERP) establishes a framework for timely,
coordinated EPA action to protect public health and safety and the
environment in response to a peacetime radiological incident. The
original EPA RERP was approved in 1986. This new revision updates
authorities, responsibilities, capabilities, and procedures for
implementing effective radiological emergency response actions by EPA
Offices. The RERP presents the EPA organizational structure and concept
of operations for responding to radiological incidents as a participant
in a Federal multi-agency response using the Federal Radiological
Emergency Response Plan (FRERP) and the Federal Response Plan (FRP),
and
[[Page 62316]]
the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP). This revision incorporates recent changes to the FRERP and NCP,
and many other policy updates. In short, this revision ensures that EPA
maintains a comprehensive strategy to provide organized, effective
assistance to State and local governments in the event of a
radiological emergency.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Plan To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3638
Was previously listed in the Regulatory Agenda as RIN 2060-AF85.
Agency Contact: Craig Conklin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9222
RIN: 2060-AI49
_______________________________________________________________________
3520. NESHAP: OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On February 2, 1998, we proposed NESHAP for oil and gas
production (major sources), oil and gas production (area sources), and
natural gas transmission and storage in one package. On June 17, 1999,
we promulgated NESHAP for oil and gas production (major sources) and
natural gas transmission and storage. In this action, we will publish a
supplemental proposal for the oil and gas production glycol dehydrators
(area sources) and subsequently promulgate the proposal.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Supplemental NPRM 06/00/03
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4162
Agency Contact: Greg Nizich, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3078
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: nizich.greg@epa.gov
Kent C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-13
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI13
_______________________________________________________________________
3521. FIELD CITATION PROGRAM
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7413(d) CAA sec 113(d)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Clean Air Act Amendments give EPA the authority to issue
on-the-spot field citations for minor violations of the Clean Air Act,
with penalties of up to $5,000 per day of violation. Section 113(d) of
the Act requires the field citation program to be implemented through
regulations which provide the informal hearing procedures. These
hearing procedures are not required to be as rigorous as those imposed
by the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), but nevertheless must
provide due process. Agency guidance providing appropriate penalties
for specific minor violations will be prepared for EPA employees and
made available to the regulated community. Training on the issuance of
field citations will also be developed.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/03/94 59 FR 22776
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 2937
Agency Contact: Cary Secrest, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2242A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8661
RIN: 2020-AA32
_______________________________________________________________________
3522. NSPS AND EMISSION GUIDELINES FOR OTHER SOLID WASTE INCINERATORS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7509 CAA sec 129
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 129 of the Clean Air Act of 1990 requires the Agency
to promulgate New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emission
Guidelines (EG) for solid waste incinerators. Section 129 specifically
required the Administrator to publish a schedule for regulating Other
Solid Waste Incinerators (OSWI). A notice published on November 9, 2000
announced that the Administrator would promulgate OSWI standards by
November 15, 2005. The notice also listed what classes of incinerators
might be covered by the OSWI standards. Standards will be set for the
following pollutants: particulate matter, opacity, sulfur dioxide,
hydrogen chloride, oxides of nitrogen, carbon monoxide, lead cadmium,
mercury, and dioxins and dibenzofurans.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 11/09/00 65 FR 66850
NPRM 11/00/04
Final Action 11/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions, Organizations
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3751
Agency Contact: Fred Porter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5251
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: porter.fred@epa.gov
Bob Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-13,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
[[Page 62317]]
Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG31
_______________________________________________________________________
3523. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION OF AIR QUALITY: PERMIT
APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR NON-FEDERAL CLASS I AREAS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7670-7479 CAA sec 160-169
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act's prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) program, a State or tribe may redesignate their
lands as class I areas to provide enhanced protection for their air
quality resources. This rule will clarify the PSD permit review
procedures for new and modified major stationary sources near these
non-Federal class I areas. EPA seeks to develop clarifying PSD permit
application procedures that are effective, efficient, and equitable.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 05/16/97 62 FR 27158
NPRM 10/00/03
Final Action 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3919
Agency Contact: Darrel Harmon, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6101A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7416
Fax: 202 501-1153
Email: harmon.darrel@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH01
_______________________________________________________________________
3524. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: UPDATE OF THE SUBSTITUTES LIST
UNDER THE SIGNIFICANT NEW ALTERNATIVES POLICY (SNAP) PROGRAM
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671(k) CAA sec 612
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82; 40 CFR 9
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 612 of the Clean Air Act requires EPA to identify
alternatives to Class I and II ozone depleting substances and to
publish lists of acceptable and unacceptable substitutes. Producers of
substitutes must notify EPA at least 90 days before alternatives are
introduced into interstate commerce. Unlike acceptable alternatives
(see Notices), substitutes which are deemed by EPA to be unacceptable
or acceptable subject to use restrictions must go through notice and
comment rulemaking. Substitute lists are updated intermittently
depending on the volume of notifications.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 01/16/92 57 FR 1984
NPRM 05/12/93 58 FR 28094
Final Rule 03/18/94 59 FR 13044
Notice 1 08/26/94 59 FR 44240
NPRM 1 09/26/94 59 FR 49108
Notice 2 01/13/95 60 FR 3318
Final Rule 1 06/13/95 60 FR 31092
Notice 3 07/28/95 60 FR 38729
NPRM 2 10/02/95 60 FR 51383
Notice 4 02/08/96 61 FR 4736
NPRM 3 05/22/96 61 FR 25604
Final Rule 2 05/22/96 61 FR 25585
Notice 5 09/05/96 61 FR 47012
Final Rule 3 10/16/96 61 FR 54030
Notice 6 03/10/97 62 FR 10700
NPRM 4 05/21/97 62 FR 27874
Notice 7 06/03/97 62 FR 30275
NPRM 5 02/03/98 63 FR 5491
Notice 8 02/24/98 63 FR 9151
Notice 9 05/22/98 63 FR 28251
Interim Final Rule 7 01/26/99 64 FR 3861
Interim Final Rule 8 01/26/99 64 FR 3865
ANPRM 9 02/18/99 64 FR 8043
NPRM 6 02/18/99 64 FR 8038
Final Rule 5 04/28/99 64 FR 22981
Notice 10 06/08/99 64 FR 30410
Notice 11 12/06/99 64 FR 68039
Notice 12 04/11/00 65 FR 19327
Final Rule 6 04/26/00 65 FR 24387
Notice 13 06/19/00 65 FR 37900
NPRM 10 07/11/00 65 FR 42653
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3525
Agency Contact: Anhar Karimjee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2683
Fax: 202 565-2095
RIN: 2060-AG12
_______________________________________________________________________
3525. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS: RISK
MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT, SECTION 112(R)(7);
AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC; TECHNICAL AMENDMENT
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: CAA 112(r)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68.210
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 112(r)(7) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and its
implementing regulations at 40 CFR Part 68 require certain stationary
sources to report an Off-site Consequence Analysis (OCA), including a
worst-case release scenario, in a Risk Management Plan (RMP) that is to
be made available to the public. In response to concerns that posting
OCA information on the Internet might increase the risk of terrorist
and other criminal activities, on August 5, 1999 the Chemical Safety
Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act was enacted.
The Act requires the President to promulgate regulations governing the
distribution of the OCA sections of RMPs that, in the opinion of the
President, would minimize the likelihood of accidental releases and the
risk of terrorist and other criminal activities associated with posting
this information. The President delegated his rulemaking authority to
the Attorney General and the Administrator of EPA, who jointly
promulgated the required regulations at 40 CFR part 1400. The part 1400
regulations restrict the public's access to the OCA sections of RMPs in
certain ways. As currently drafted, however, section 68.210(a) of part
68 states that RMPs are available to the public under CAA section 114,
which makes information collected under the CAA, including RMPs in
their entirety, available to the public, except for confidential
business information. EPA is therefore revising 40 CFR section
68.210(a) to reflect the August 2000 rulemaking and the revision will
state that OCA data is made available to the public under the
provisions of 40 CFR part 1400.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action To Be Determined
[[Page 62318]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4607
Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epa.gov
John Ferris, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-7992
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: ferris.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE95
_______________________________________________________________________
3526. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS: RISK
MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT, SECTION 112(R)(3);
REVISIONS TO THE LIST OF SUBSTANCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: CAA 112(r)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68.130
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The list of substances subject to the Chemical Accident
Prevention requirements at 40 CFR part 68 was promulgated on January
31, 1994. The Clean Air Act states that the list may be revised from
time to time by EPA's own motion or by petition and shall be reviewed
at least every 5 years. Since the January 1994 final list rule, EPA has
modified the listing for hydrochloric acid; deleted a category of
explosive chemicals; exempted flammable substances in gasoline used as
fuel and in naturally occurring hydrocarbon mixtures prior to initial
processing; and excluded flammable substances used as a fuel or held
for sale as a fuel at a retail facility. In fulfillment of the
statute's five-year review requirement, EPA has conducted a thorough
review of the list. Based on that review, EPA is proposing additions,
deletions and modifications to the list of substances. Deletions are
based on EPA's review of the chemical toxicity, physical property,
production/use quantity and accident history of currently listed
substances and new information or erroneous data that impacts the basis
of the chemical's listing. Other toxic and flammable chemicals are
proposed to be added because they meet the criteria for listing a toxic
or flammable substance. In addition, EPA proposes to revise the
reporting threshold and toxic endpoints of several toxic substances
based on updated toxicity information. Facilities with more than the
threshold quantity of a listed substance in a process are required to
develop a Risk Management Program and submit a Risk Management Plan to
EPA. The proposed changes to the list will ensure that facilities are
properly managing risks of the most acutely toxic and flammable
chemicals that could have an adverse impact on the facility and
surrounding community in event of an accidental release.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4619
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries
Agency Contact: Kathy Franklin, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-7987
Fax: 202 564-8211
Email: franklin.kathy@epa.gov
Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE96
_______________________________________________________________________
3527. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: PROCESS FOR EXEMPTING
QUARANTINE AND PRESHIPMENT METHYL BROMIDE AND TRADE BAN WITH NON-PARTIES
TO THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7671 to 7671(q)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.1 to 82.13
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Montreal Protocol exempts quarantine and preshipment from
the methyl bromide production and import baseline; therefore, a
regulation must be promulgated to allow for the exemption in EPA's
current allowance system.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Interim Final Rule 07/19/01 66 FR 37752
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4253
OLD TITLE: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting
Quarantine and Preshipment Methyl Bromide Used in the United States and
Baseline Adjustments
Agency Contact: Suzanne Bratis, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3515
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: bratis.suzanne@epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9185
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: land.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI42
_______________________________________________________________________
3528. REVIEW NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR CARBON MONOXIDE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Title I
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 31, 2001, Clean Air Act requires
reviews every five years.
Abstract: Review of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
for carbon monoxide (CO) every 5 years is mandated by the Clean Air
Act. This review assesses the available scientific data about the
health and environmental effects of CO and translates the science into
terms that can be used in making recommendations about whether or how
the standards should be changed. The last review of the CO NAAQS was
[[Page 62319]]
completed in 1994 with a final decision that revisions were not
appropriate at that time.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/03
Final Action 05/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4266
Agency Contact: David McKee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, RTP, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5288
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: mckee.dave@epa.gov
Harvey Richmond, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
MD-15, RTP, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5271
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: richmond.harvey@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI43
_______________________________________________________________________
3529. REVISION TO NOX SIP CALL EMISSION BUDGETS FOR CONNECTICUT,
MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410(a)(2)(D); 42 USC 7410(k)(5)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On October 27, 1998, EPA published a final rule (the OTAG SIP
Call) making a finding of significant contribution and assigning
statewide NOx emission budgets to 22 States and the District of
Columbia for purposes of reducing regional transport of ozone and its
precursor, NOx. Subsequent to the promulgation of the SIP call, EPA and
the States of Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island signed a
memorandum of understanding that obligated EPA to propose to
redistribute the budgets assigned to the three States in a different
way. This action would carry out that obligation. This redistribution
would not lead to an increase in the overall budget for the three
States.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 09/15/99 64 FR 49987
Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule 11/01/99 64 FR 58792
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4276
Direct Final Action- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1999/September/Day-15/a23914.htm
Withdrawal-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1999/November/Day-01/a28519.htm
Agency Contact: Kathryn Petrillo, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6204J
Phone: 202 564-9093
Fax: 202 565-2141
Email: petrillo.kathryn@epa.gov
Kevin Culligan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6204J
Phone: 202 564-9172
Fax: 202 564-2141
Email: culligan.kevin@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI80
_______________________________________________________________________
3530. INTERSTATE OZONE TRANSPORT: RULEMAKING ON SECTION 126 PETITIONS
FROM THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND NEW JERSEY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7426
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 97
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 14, 1999, The rulemaking
includes action on 4 separate petitions. See Additional Information.
Abstract: In April through July 1999, 3 Northeastern States (New
Jersey, Maryland, and Delaware) and the District of Columbia submitted
individual petitions to EPA in accordance with section 126 of the Clean
Air Act (CAA). Each petition specifically requests that EPA make a
finding that nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from certain stationary
sources in other States significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment
and maintenance problems with respect to the 1-hour and 8-hour ozone
standards in the petitioning State. If EPA makes such a finding of
significant contribution, EPA is authorized to establish Federal
emissions limits for the sources. The petitions rely on the analyses
from EPA's NOx SIP call. The sources targeted by the petitions are
large electricity generating units and large non-electricity generating
units, as defined in EPA's NOx SIP call. The CAA requires EPA to take
final action on the petitions within 60 days of receipt, but may extend
the deadline for up to 6 additional months to allow for public process.
The EPA took rulemaking action on similar petitions from 8 other
northeastern States that were submitted in 1997.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4383
There is a different statutory deadline associated with each petition
based on the date of receipt by EPA: New Jersey - 12/14/99, Maryland -
01/01/00, Delaware - 02/10/00, District of Columbia - 03/07/00
Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epa.gov
David Cole, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-15,
MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5565
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: cole.david@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI99
[[Page 62320]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3531. RESCINDING FINDING THAT PRE-EXISTING PM10 STANDARDS NO LONGER
APPLICABLE IN NORTHERN ADA COUNTY/BOISE, IDAHO
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50.6(d); 40 CFR 52.676; 40 CFR 81.313
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The EPA had previously taken action to revoke the PM-10
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for the Boise/Ada County
area in anticipation that a revised PM-10 NAAQS would soon be in place.
However, the DC Circuit court subsequently vacated the revised PM-10
NAAQS, the effectiveness of which served as the underlying basis for
EPA's decision to revoke the pre-existing PM-10 NAAQS. Therefore, in
order to protect public health in the Boise/Ada County area, EPA is
proposing to reinstate the pre-existing PM-10 NAAQS. Without this
action there would be no Federal PM-10 NAAQS applicable to this area.
This action is tentatively subject to the terms of a settlement
agreement that was signed by all parties in January 2001. A Federal
Register notice of the proposed settlement requesting public comment
was published January 30, 2001 in accordance with section 113(g) of the
Act. Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be
received by EPA (Mike Prosper) by March 1, 2001. Unless EPA or DOJ
determine, following the comment period, that consent is inappropriate
the settlement agreement will then be executed by the parties. This
action will then be fully subject to the terms of the settlement
agreement. No negative comments received. EPA/DOJ signed the settlement
agreement and the State is in the process of carrying out its
obligations under the settlement agreement.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/26/00 65 FR 39321
Notice Extension of Comment
Period 07/26/00 65 FR 45953
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4391
Agency Contact: Gary Blais, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, MD-15, RTP, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3223
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: blais.gary@epa.gov
Geoffrey Wilcox, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
2344A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5601
Email: wilcox.geoffrey@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ05
_______________________________________________________________________
3532. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: PROCESS FOR EXEMPTING CRITICAL
AND EMERGENCY USES OF METHYL BROMIDE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671c; PL 764
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: With this action, EPA will revise the accelerated phaseout
regulations that govern the production, import, export, transformation
and destruction of substances that deplete the ozone layer. The
amendments will incorporate exemptions permitted under the Montreal
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and recent changes
to the Clean Air Act. Specifically, the amendments will create a
process to exempt production and consumption of quantities of methyl
bromide for critical and emergency uses from the 2005 phaseout of
methyl bromide. Because this is an exemption, the rule will confer a
benefit on affected entities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4535
Agency Contact: Amber Moreen, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9295
Fax: 202 565-2095
Email: moreen.amber@epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9185
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: land.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ63
_______________________________________________________________________
3533. PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY NESHAP:
AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT COURT REMAND
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1340 to 63.1359 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry NESHAP was
promulgated June 14, 1999, and has been codified in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations 63, Subpart LLL. The Sierra Club and the National Lime
Association petitioned the court to review subpart LLL, while the
American Portland Cement Alliance (APCA) opted to negotiate a
settlement agreement. (Note that there is currently a separate rule
under development to amend subpart LLL to implement the settlement
agreement with the APCA -- SAN 4524, RIN 2060-AJ57). On December 15,
2000, a panel of the D.C. Circuit issued its opinion in National Lime
Assn. v. EPA. The Court remanded the three standards for which we
established floors of no control (hydrogen chloride [HCl], total
hydrocarbon (THC), and mercury (Hg)). The Court found that we committed
error in not considering other means of control, in particular, control
of HAPs in raw materials and in fossil fuels. The Court also remanded
that we consider setting beyond-the-floor standards for HAP metals, for
which particulate matter (PM) is a surrogate. This action will consist
of amendments to respond to the court remand.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
[[Page 62321]]
Additional Information: SAN No. 4585
Sectors Affected: 32731 Cement Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Joseph Wood, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5446
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: wood.joe@epa.gov
James Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
13, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ78
_______________________________________________________________________
3534. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR GEORGIA-PACIFIC
CORPORATION'S FACILITY IN BIG ISLAND, VIRGINIA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Project XL program, the EPA is supporting a project
for the Georgia-Pacific Corporation facility located in Big Island,
Virginia. The EPA is promulgating this rule, applicable only to the
Georgia-Pacific Big Island facility, to help implement the project.
Under the XL project, Georgia-Pacific will install and operate the
first commercial scale black liquor gasification system in the United
States. This system will provide superior air emissions reductions and
energy benefits compared to use of conventional recovery technology for
black liquor in the pulp and paper industry. However, since this will
be the first commercial scale demonstration of this technology, there
is some risk that the technology will take longer than planned to work
properly or may not ever work properly. If either of these scenarios
happens, Georgia-Pacific requires relief from otherwise applicable air
emission standards to allow time for the new technology to achieve
expected performance or, in the event of failure, to allow time for
Georgia-Pacific to build conventional recovery technology that will
meet applicable standards. Without this relief, Georgia-Pacific would
not undertake commercialization of this promising technology.
Therefore, this rule provides relief (in the form of limited duration
compliance extensions)from otherwise applicable hazardous air pollutant
emission standards, as needed during the conduct of the XL project. The
specific standard amended by this rule is: Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants From Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda,
Sulfate, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills.
Timetable: Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4471
Formerly RIN 2060-AJ39.
Sectors Affected: 32211 Pulp Mills; 32211 Pulp Mills
Agency Contact: David Beck, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
the Administrator, MD-10, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5421
Fax: 919 541-2464
Email: beck.david@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA26
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3535. ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR YUCCA MOUNTAIN,
NEVADA
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 197
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 06/13/01 66 FR 32074
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Agency Contact: Ray Clark
Phone: 202 564-9198
Fax: 202 565-2065
Email: clark.ray@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG14
_______________________________________________________________________
3536. NESHAP: PULP AND PAPER PRODUCTION; AMENDMENTS TO THE PROMULGATED
RULE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.440 to 63.459 (Revision)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Technical Corrections 05/14/01 66 FR 24268
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Stephen Shedd
Phone: 919 541-5397
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: shedd.steve@epa.gov
Kent C. Hustvedt
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH74
_______________________________________________________________________
3537. NESHAP: MANUFACTURING OF NUTRITIONAL YEAST
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 05/21/01 66 FR 27876
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: David Markwordt
Phone: 919 541-0837
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: markwordt.david@epa.gov
Susan Wyatt
Phone: 919 541-5674
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: wyatt.susan@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF30
[[Page 62322]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3538. NESHAP: BOAT MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 08/22/01 66 FR 44218
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Mark Morris
Phone: 919 541-5416
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: morris.mark@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG27
_______________________________________________________________________
3539. NESHAP: SOLVENT EXTRACTION FOR VEGETABLE OIL PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/12/01 66 FR 19003
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: James Durham
Phone: 919 541-5672
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: durham.jim@epa.gov
K.C. Hustvedt
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH22
_______________________________________________________________________
3540. CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS: FLEXIBLE PACKAGE PRINTING
MATERIALS: DETERMINATION ON CONTROL TECHNIQUES GUIDELINES IN LIEU OF
REGULATION
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Action 09/24/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Paul Almodovar
Phone: 919 541-0283
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: almodovar.paul@epa.gov
Dianne Byrne
Phone: 919 541-5689
Fax: 919 541-5342
Email: byrne.dianne@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI31
_______________________________________________________________________
3541. IDENTIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL OZONE AREAS ATTAINING THE 1-HOUR
STANDARD AND TO WHICH THE 1-HOUR STANDARD IS NO LONGER APPLICABLE (7
AREAS)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81 (Revision)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Action 09/19/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Annie Nikbakht
Phone: 919 541-5246
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: nikbakht.annie@epa.gov
Barry Gilbert
Phone: 919 541-5238
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: gilbert.barry@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI57
_______________________________________________________________________
3542. NESHAP: LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATE MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Merged into RIN 2060-AI67, SAN
No. 4325 09/28/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Agency Contact: Gene Crumper
Phone: 919 541-0881
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crumpler.gene@epa.gov
Al Vervaert
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI75
_______________________________________________________________________
3543. REGULATION OF FUELS AND FUEL ADDITIVES: REFORMULATED GASOLINE
ADJUSTMENT
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.45
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 07/17/01 66 FR 37156
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Barry Garelick
Phone: 202 564-9028
Fax: 202 564-2085
Email: garelick.barry@epa.gov
Lori Stewart
Phone: 202 564-9028
Fax: 202 565-2084
Email: shields.mike@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI98
_______________________________________________________________________
3544. NESHAP: ALUMINUM DIE CASTING AND ALUMINUM FOUNDRIES
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Action 09/28/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Juan E. Santiago
Phone: 919 541-1084
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: santiago.juan@epa.gov
Jim Crowder
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ09
[[Page 62323]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3545. REMOVAL OF ALUMINUM DIE CASTING AND ALUMINUM FOUNDRIES FROM THE
SECONDARY ALUMINUM NESHAP AND APPLICABILITY STAY FOR THESE INDUSTRIES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Action 10/31/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Juan E. Santiago
Phone: 919 541-1084
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: santiago.juan@epa.gov
Jim Crowder
Phone: 919 541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ11
_______________________________________________________________________
3546. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE ALLOCATION OF ESSENTIAL-USE
ALLOWANCES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2001: LABORATORY ESSENTIAL USE EXEMPTIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 2001 De
Minimis Exemption 03/13/01 66 FR 14760
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Erin Birgfeld
Phone: 202 564-9079
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: birgfeld.erin@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ15
_______________________________________________________________________
3547. NESHAP FOR PHARMACEUTICALS PRODUCTION: DIRECT FINAL AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule Amendments 08/02/01 66 FR 40121
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Randy McDonald
Phone: 919 541-5402
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov
Penny Lassiter
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: lassiter.penny@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ17
_______________________________________________________________________
3548. REVISION TO INTERIM APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 05/15/01 66 FR 27008
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Roger Powell
Phone: 919 541-5331
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: powell.roger@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ48
_______________________________________________________________________
3549. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW SOURCES AND EMISSION GUIDELINES
FOR EXISTING SOURCES: LARGE MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTORS AMENDMENT OF MASS
BURN ROTARY WATERWALL DEFINITION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 07/12/01 66 FR 36473
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Fred Porter
Phone: 919 541-5251
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: porter.fred@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ51
_______________________________________________________________________
3550. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM NEW MOTOR VEHICLES AMENDMENTS TO THE
TIER 2/GASOLINE SULFUR REGULATIONS
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80; 40 CFR 86
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 04/13/01 66 FR 19296
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Don Kopinski
Phone: 734 214-4229
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: kopinski.donald@epa.gov
Paul Machele
Phone: 734 214-4264
Fax: 734 214-4050
Email: machiele.paul@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ54
_______________________________________________________________________
3551. PETITION BY COLORADO TO RELAX THE REID VAPOR PRESSURE STANDARD FOR
GASOLINE FOR 2001
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.27
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 05/24/01 66 FR 28807
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Agency Contact: Marilyn Winstead McCall
Phone: 202 564-9020
RIN: 2060-AJ55
_______________________________________________________________________
3552. NESHAP: AMENDMENTS TO FERROALLOYS PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 03/20/01 66 FR 16007
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Conrad Chin
Phone: 919 541-1512
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: chin.conrad@epa.gov
[[Page 62324]]
Al Vervaert
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ56
_______________________________________________________________________
3553. NESHAP: FERROALLOY PRODUCTION: FERROMANGANESE AND SILICOMANGANESE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Action 08/29/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Agency Contact: Conrad Chin
Phone: 919 541-1512
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: chin.conrad@epa.gov
Al Vervaert
Phone: 919 541-5602
Email: vervaert.al@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ64
_______________________________________________________________________
3554. REVISION TO THE REQUIREMENTS ON VARIABILITY IN THE
COMPOSITION OF ADDITIVES CERTIFIED UNDER THE GASOLINE DEPOSIT CONTROL
PROGRAM; DIRECT FINAL AND PROPOSED RULES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, May 30, 2001, Settlement Agreement
with American Chemistry Council in 8/2000 requires publication of NPRM
``as expeditiously as practicable.
Abstract: Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement with the American
Chemistry Council that became final in August, 2000, EPA is to publish
a proposed rule making minor revisions to the regulations on the
certification of detergent additives in gasoline. The Settlement
Agreement requires that EPA publish a notice of proposed rulemaking
``as expeditiously as practicable.'' Publication of this proposed rule
would fulfill this requirement. We expect that the proposed changes
will be uncontroversial. Consequently, a direct final rule would be
published as part of this action containing the regulatory changes in
the proposed rule. The regulatory changes in this action would address
additive manufacturer concerns that compliance with the existing
requirements would be burdensome and difficult, while maintaining the
emissions control benefits of the gasoline deposit control program.
This action would not result in an adverse impact on small businesses.
There would be no impacts on State, local, or tribal governments. There
are no cross-media issues.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 11/05/01 66 FR 55885
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4557
Action is consistent with Settlement Agreement signed with American
Chemistry Council in January 2000, which became final in August, 2000
(no comments were received in the public notice and comment). ACC v.
EPA, D.C. Cir. No. 94-1778 (consol).
Sectors Affected: 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Jeff Herzog, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, ASD, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4227
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: herzog.jeff@epa.gov
Andrea Medici, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
ARLO/PTSLO
Phone: 202 564-5434
Fax: 202 564-5653
Email: medici.andrea@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ69
_______________________________________________________________________
3555. PROHIBITIONS ON GASOLINE CONTAINING LEAD OR LEAD
ADDITIVES FOR HIGHWAY USE: FUEL INLET RESTRICTOR EXCLUSION FOR
MOTORCYCLES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.24(b) (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Honda has requested that motorcycles be exempt from the
filler inlet restrictor requirement. The burden for motorcycle
manufacturers and owners is significant, and much of the air quality
benefits intended by vapor recover nozzles are not realized when used
to refuel many motorcycles. The Clean Air Act and corresponding EPA
regulation prohibits gasoline containing lead or lead additives (leaded
gasoline) as a motor vehicle fuel after December 31, 1995. The
regulation also requires filler inlet restrictors on motor vehicles
equipped with an emission control device that will be impacted by the
use of leaded gasoline, such as a catalytic converter. Beginning with
the introduction of Stage I vapor recovery fueling systems in the early
1990s, and continuing with current Stage II vapor recovery systems, the
filler inlet restrictor has also been used as a guide, a seat and a
pressure contact point for some vapor recovery gasoline nozzle spouts.
Consequently, EPA retained the requirement for the filler inlet
restrictor after 1995. As a practical matter, filler inlet restrictors
are not feasible for most motorcycle fuel tanks, especially the saddle
type of tank, because of limited depth. Typically motorcycles are
fueled while the operator observes the tank fuel level, similar to
refueling a gas can. The filler inlet restrictor obstructs the view of
the fuel level, and could contribute to fuel spillage. Further, the
filler inlet restrictor requires the nozzle spout to be inserted deeper
into the tank, potentially causing increased splash back. This was not
much of an issue in the 1995 and earlier time frame, because only
relatively few motorcycles were equipped with catalytic converters, and
thus, only relatively few required filler inlet restrictors. However, a
significant number of 2001 model year motorcycles have been equipped
with catalytic converters.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 10/31/01 66 FR 54955
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4564
[[Page 62325]]
Sectors Affected: 33611 Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Richard Babst, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, EN-340-F, 6406-J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9473
Fax: 202 565-2085
Email: babst.richard@epa.gov
Mike Shields, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406-
J
Phone: 202 564-9035
Fax: 202 565-2085
Email: shields.mike@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ76
_______________________________________________________________________
3556. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY FLINT
RIVER OPERATIONS
Priority: Routine and Frequent
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 06/27/01 66 FR 34119
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Janet Murray
Phone: 202 260-7570
Fax: 202 260-3125
Email: murray.janet@epa.gov
Lynda Crum
Phone: 404 562-9524
Email: crum.lynda@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA20
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3557. PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDANCE FOR DRINKING WATER
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 2021(h) AEA of 1954 sec 274(h); Reorganization
Plan No. 3 of 1970; PL 96-295 sec 304; EO 12241
CFR Citation: 41 CFR 351
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will result in Federal protective action guidance
(PAG) for State and local officials to use in the event of a nuclear
accident to protect the general public from the adverse health effects
associated with the ingestion of drinking water that is contaminated
with radioactive material. The PAG will be incorporated into the
revision of the PAG manual. The draft guidance will be submitted to the
PAG subcommittee of the Federal Radiological Preparedness Coordinating
Committee (FRPCC) for review and comment. Members of the PAG
subcommittee include representatives from DOE, DOD, FEMA, NRC, HHS,
USDA, DOT, and the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors
(CRCPD). When a consensus among the representatives is reached, the
guidance is recommended to the full FRPCC for endorsement. After that
endorsement is obtained a notice of the availability of a revised EPA
400-R-92-001, Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions
for Nuclear Incidents will be published in the Federal Register. This
action is temporarily delayed until the FDA's revised PAGs for food can
be evaluated.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice of Availability 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3602
Agency Contact: Charles Blue, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9488
RIN: 2060-AF39
_______________________________________________________________________
3558. ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR THE DISPOSAL OF
LOW-ACTIVITY MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 2021 Atomic Energy Act of 1954; Reorganization
Plan No. 3 of 1970; Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 193
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This voluntary action will allow low-activity mixed
radioactive wastes to be disposed in facilities that meet the design
requirements for RCRA-C disposal cells. The wastes intended to be
disposed of in these cells are mixed wastes, consisting of a chemically
hazardous component and low levels of radioactivity. These wastes are
anticipated to arise in the commercial sector from various sources. The
rule is intended to increase disposal options for these wastes and
offer a streamlined regulatory process which melds hazardous chemical
protection and radioactivity protection requirements while protecting
public health and safety. The rule does not mandate a disposal method,
but rather permits an alternative to existing disposal methods. The
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is anticipated to be the
implementing Agency for the application of this rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4054
Agency Contact: Dan Schultheisz, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9300
Fax: 202 565-2062
Email: schultheisz.daniel@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH63
_______________________________________________________________________
3559. REVISION OF THE 40 CFR PART 194 WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT
COMPLIANCE CRITERIA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 106 Stat. 4777 as amended by the 1996 LWA Amendments;
PL 102-579; PL 104-201; Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal Act
of 1992
[[Page 62326]]
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 194.8(b)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule would change some of the language in Section
194.8(b) of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Compliance Criteria
without deleting any of the requirements for the Department of Energy's
(DOE) compliance. Section 194.8(b) explains the process by which EPA
inspects and approves waste characterization processes at DOE
transuranic waste sites that send waste to the WIPP. The 194.8(b)
process involves a public comment period. Most of the language in
section 194.8(b) will be left intact. The most significant change would
eliminate a statement that EPA will follow the 194.8(b) notice-and-
comment process each time a previously approved site seeks to send a
different waste stream to the WIPP. Other changes would correct certain
terminology and clarify the important elements of our inspections. This
rule would eliminate the ambiguity of the current language and replace
it with: (1) a site can ship waste once EPA has approved it using a
notice-and-comment process; (2) EPA will perform follow-up inspections
under a separate authority that does not call for public comment; and
(3) EPA can disallow shipment if an initial or follow-up inspection
reveals significant compliance issues. The main purpose of this
revision is to eliminate EPA's obligation to approve DOE sites on a
waste stream by waste stream basis. Our understanding of DOE's
operations has improved considerably since 194.8(b) went final in May
1998. We now recognize that approving sites by waste stream, using a
comment period, is unnecessarily time-consuming for EPA staff,
confusing for DOE, and generates almost no public comment. In addition,
repetitive inspections at sites are expensive and provide little
additional regulatory confidence. This rule will save money and will
greatly improve the effectiveness of our interactions with DOE.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4403
Agency Contact: Scott Monroe, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6608J
Phone: 202 564-9712
TDD Phone: 202 564-9320
Fax: 202 565-2062
Email: monroe.scott@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ07
_______________________________________________________________________
3560. MODIFICATION OF 40 CFR PART 194, APPEDIX A, WASTE
ISOLATION PILOT PLANT CERTIFICATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: PL 102-579, sec 8
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 194, app A
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will modify the certification of the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) that EPA granted in May 1998 by replacing
or deleting Condition 1 of the certification. Condition 1 requires the
Department of Energy (DOE), which operates the WIPP, to employ a
specific design for panel seals in the disposal system. DOE plans to
propose a different design for EPA's consideration, and our preliminary
review suggests that we will be able to accept the proposal. However,
because this change constitutes a significant departure from the
existing program, under section 194.4 of the WIPP Compliance Criteria
(40 CFR 194) we must conduct a rulemaking to accept the change.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 10/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4582
Agency Contact: Sharon White, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-9457
TDD Phone: 202 564-9320
Fax: 202 565-2062
Email: white.sharon@epa.gov
Scott Monroe, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6608J
Phone: 202 564-9712
TDD Phone: 202 564-9320
Fax: 202 565-2062
Email: monroe.scott@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ75
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3561. ACCEPTABILITY OF RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 115 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AD57
[[Page 62327]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3562. ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR SCREENING PROGRAM
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 131 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AD26
_______________________________________________________________________
3563. PROCEDURES FOR THE PESTICIDE REGISTRATION REVIEW PROGRAM
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a)(g); 7 USC 136(w)
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency will establish procedures to implement section
3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
which provides for periodic review of pesticide registrations. The goal
of these regulations is to review a pesticide's registration every 15
years.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM Pesticides-Procedural
Regulations for Registration
Review 04/26/00 65 FR 24586
NPRM 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4170
Sectors Affected: 32519 Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing;
32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 32551
Paint and Coating Manufacturing; 32561 Soap and Cleaning Compound
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Vivian Prunier, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703 308-9341
Fax: 703 308-5884
Email: prunier.vivian@epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5944
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: frane.jean@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD29
_______________________________________________________________________
3564. DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTIMICROBIAL PESTICIDE REGISTRATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a; 7 USC 136c; 7 USC 136w
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA will update and revise its pesticide data requirements
for antimicrobial products. The data requirements specify the data that
are required for EPA to evaluate the registrability of a pesticide
product. The revisions will clarify all antimicrobial data requirements
to reflect current practice.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4173
Sectors Affected: 32519 Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing;
32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 32551
Paint and Coating Manufacturing; 32561 Soap and Cleaning Compound
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Paul Parsons, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703 308-9073
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: parsons.paul@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD30
_______________________________________________________________________
3565. PESTICIDE EMERGENCY EXEMPTION REGULATIONS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 132 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AD36
_______________________________________________________________________
3566. DATA REQUIREMENT FOR PESTICIDE REGISTRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE
AND ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) to 136(y)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA will update the data requirements specifically necessary
for the Agency to evaluate the registrability of pesticide products.
The revisions will clarify all data requirements to reflect current
practice. Procedural and explanatory sections of the current
regulations will be amended to make them consistent with the revised
data requirements and new use indexing. EPA intends to accomplish this
revision through a series of proposals, covering different data
disciplines and product types. This proposal covers the data
requirements for environmental fate and ecological effects for
conventional pesticides.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4496
Split from RIN 2070-AC12.
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Melissa Chun, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703 305-4027
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: chun.melissa@epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5944
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: frane.jean@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD47
_______________________________________________________________________
3567. DATA REQUIREMENTS; BIOCHEMICAL AND MICROBIAL PESTICIDES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA will update the data requirements necessary to register a
biochemical or microbial pesticide product. The revisions will clarify
all
[[Page 62328]]
data requirements to reflect current regulatory and scientific
standards. The data requirements will cover all scientific disciplines
for biochemical and microbial pesticides, including chemistry and
residue chemistry, toxicology and environmental fate and effects. The
revision will not include plant incorporated protectants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4596
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Carol Peterson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703 305-6598
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: peterson.carol@epa.gov
William Schneider, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7511C
Phone: 703 308-8683
Fax: 703 308-7026
Email: schneider.william@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD51
_______________________________________________________________________
3568. EXEMPTION OF MEDICAL DEVICES TREATED WITH ANTIMICROBIAL
PESTICIDES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136w
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.20
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will exempt from pesticide regulation medical
devices treated with antimicrobial pesticides. EPA has determined that
these treated medical devices are adequately regulated by the Food and
Drug Administration. This action would eliminate dual regulation of
these products by EPA and FDA. EPA would continue to regulate the
antimicrobial pesticide used to treat the medical device.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4609
Sectors Affected: 32619 Other Plastics Product Manufacturing; 31499 All
Other Textile Product Mills
Agency Contact: Melba Morrow, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7510C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703 308-2716
Fax: 703 308-8481
Email: morrow.melba@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD54
_______________________________________________________________________
3569. PLANT INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS (PIPS); EXEMPTION FOR
PIPS THAT ACT BY PRIMARILY AFFECTING THE PLANT
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 133 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AD56
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3570. PLANT INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS (PIPS); EXEMPTION FOR
THOSE BASED ON VIRAL COAT PROTEINS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 143 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AD49
_______________________________________________________________________
3571. PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 165
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action develops procedures for mandatory and voluntary
recall actions under section 19(b) of FIFRA and would establish
criteria for acceptable storage and disposal plans which registrants
may submit to this Agency to become eligible for reimbursement of
storage costs. This action establishes procedures for indemnification
of owners of suspended and canceled pesticides for disposal.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/05/93 58 FR 26856
Final Action 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3432
Agency Contact: David Stangel, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2225A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4162
Fax: 202 564-0028
RIN: 2020-AA33
_______________________________________________________________________
3572. PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL; STANDARDS FOR PESTICIDE
CONTAINERS AND CONTAINMENT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(q) FIFRA sec 19; 7 USC 136(a) FIFRA sec 3; 7
USC 136(w) FIFRA sec 25
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 156; 40 CFR 165
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: FIFRA sec. 19 gives EPA authority to regulate the management
of pesticides and their containers, including storage, transportation
and disposal. As proposed, this rule would establish standards for
removal of pesticides from containers and for rinsing containers;
facilitate the safe use, refill, reuse, and disposal of
[[Page 62329]]
pesticide containers by establishing standards for container design,
labeling and refilling; and establish requirements for containment of
stationary bulk containers and for containment of pesticide dispensing
areas.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM (Container Design & Residue
Removal & Bulk Containment) 02/11/94 59 FR 6712
Supplemental NPRM Extension of
Comment Period 12/21/99 64 FR 71368
Supplemental NPRM Extension of
Comment Period 02/24/00 65 FR 9234
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2659
Supplemental NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1999/October/Day-21/p27397.htm
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing; 11511 Support Activities for Crop Production; 42291 Farm
Supplies Wholesalers
Agency Contact: Nancy Fitz, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703 305-7385
Fax: 703 308-3259
Email: fitz.nancy@epa.gov
Jude Andreasen, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-9342
Fax: 703 308-3259
Email: andreasen.jude@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB95
_______________________________________________________________________
3573. GROUNDWATER AND PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN RULE
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 140 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AC46
_______________________________________________________________________
3574. WPS; PESTICIDE WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD; GLOVE AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(w)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 170
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This final rule would create greater flexibility in
requirements of the 1992 Worker Protection Standard related to the use
of gloves by workers and applicators.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Glove Requirement 09/09/97 62 FR 47544
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3731
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1997/September/Day-09/p23833.htm
Sectors Affected: 111 Crop Production; 1114 Greenhouse, Nursery and
Floriculture Production; 1131 Timber Tract Operations; 115 Support
Activities for Agriculture and Forestry
Agency Contact: Donald Eckerman, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5062
Fax: 703 308-2962
Email: eckerman.donald@epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5944
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: frane.jean@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC93
_______________________________________________________________________
3575. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTIMICROBIAL PESTICIDE PRODUCTS;
LABELING AND OTHER REGULATORY CHANGES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a)(h); 7 USC 136(w)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152; 40 CFR 156
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 15, 2000, The Final Rule is
due 240 days after close of comment period.
Abstract: This regulation will specify antimicrobial registration
reforms that will reduce to the extent possible the review time for
antimicrobial pesticides. The regulation will clarify criteria for
completeness of applications, and will specify or refer to a definition
of the various classes of antimicrobial pesticide use patterns and the
associated data and labeling requirements that would be consistent with
the degree and type of risk presented by each class. In addition, the
regulation will also include labeling standards for public health
antimicrobial products. This regulation will also implement some
general provisions of FIFRA pertaining to all pesticides, including
labeling requirements. EPA intends to promulgate these last provisions
separately from the antimicrobial portion of the proposal.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Reg. Require. for Anti
Pest. Products/Other Pest Reg
Changes 09/17/99 64 FR 50671
Notice Extends Comment Period to
January 18, 2000 11/16/99 64 FR 62145
Final Action Labeling and other
regulatory portions 01/00/02
Final Action Antimicrobial
procedural portion only. 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3892
Sectors Affected: 32519 Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing;
32531 Fertilizer Manufacturing; 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural
Chemical Manufacturing; 32551 Paint and Coating Manufacturing; 32561
Soap and Cleaning Compound Manufacturing; 42269 Other Chemical and
Allied Products Wholesalers; 42291 Farm Supplies Wholesalers
Agency Contact: Cleo Pizana, Environmental Protection Agency,
[[Page 62330]]
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7510C,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-6431
Email: pizana.cleo@epa.gov
Jean M. Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5944
Email: frane.jean@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD14
_______________________________________________________________________
3576. PLANT-INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS (PIPS); EXEMPTION FOR
THOSE DERIVED THROUGH GENETIC ENGINEERING FROM SEXUALLY COMPATIBLE
PLANTS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 144 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AD55
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3577. PESTICIDES; TOLERANCE PROCESSING FEES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 180.33
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In 1996, the Food Quality Protection Act amended the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require EPA to charge tolerance fees
that, in the aggregate, will cover all costs associated with processing
tolerance actions, including filing a tolerance petition, and
establishing, modifying, leaving in effect, or revoking a tolerance or
tolerance exemption. Since 1983 (the last time a cost analysis was
conducted), factors such as expanded data requirements, changes in risk
assessment methods, improvements in data base management and tracking
systems, and the increasing complexity of scientific review of
petitions have resulted in costs substantially exceeding the fees
currently charged. This rule will adjust the fee structure and fee
amounts for tolerance actions. A Congressional provisions currently
bars the Agency from finalizing this rulemaking.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Pesticides-Tolerance
Processing Fees 06/09/99 64 FR 31039
Supplemental NPRM Processing
Fees for Inert Ingredients 07/24/00 65 FR 45569
Supplemental NPRM Reopening of
Comment Period 08/31/00 65 FR 52979
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4027
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1999/June/Day-09/p14477.htm
Supplemental NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2000/July/Day-24/p18646.htm
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Carol Peterson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703 305-6598
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: peterson.carol@epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5944
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: frane.jean@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD23
_______________________________________________________________________
3578. PESTICIDE TOLERANCE REASSESSMENT PROGRAM
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a)(q)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 180
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, August 3, 2002, See additional
information.
Abstract: EPA will reassess pesticide tolerances and exemptions for raw
and processed foods established prior to August 3, 1996, to determine
whether they meet the reasonable certainty of no harm standard of the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). FFDCA sec. 408(q), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). FQPA requires that
EPA conduct this reassessment on a phased 10-year schedule. Based on
its reassessment, EPA will take a series of regulatory actions to
modify or revoke tolerances. Since such actions are issued on a
chemical-by-chemical basis, this regulatory plan entry does not list
the individual actions that are likely to occur under this program. For
status information about the individual chemicals, go to
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4175
LEGAL DEADLINE CONT: EPA is required to complete reassessments on a
phased schedule of: 33 percent by August 3; 1999; 66 percent by August
3; 2002; and 100 percent by August 3; 2006. The Agency will continue to
access pesticide tolerances throughout year.
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Robert McNally, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7508C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703 308-8085
Fax: 703 308-8041
Email: mcnally.robert@epa.gov
[[Page 62331]]
Joseph Nevola, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7508C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8037
Email: nevola.joseph@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD24
_______________________________________________________________________
3579. PLANT INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS (FORMERLY PLANT PESTICIDES)
RULEMAKINGS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a) et seq; 7 USC 136 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.20; 40 CFR 174
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Substances that plants produce to protect themselves against
pests are pesticides under FIFRA if humans intend to use them to
destroy, prevent, repel or mitigate any pest. The Agency designates
these substances, along with the genetic material necessary to produce
them, plant-pesticides. This rulemaking will change the name of these
pesticides to plant-incorporated protectants and will clarify the
relationship between plants and plant-incorporated protectants and
exempt conventional breeding and establishes a new part in title 40 of
the CFR, part 174, which consolidates regulations specific for plant-
pesticides in one part of the CFR. The proposed consolidation is
expected to benefit the public by providing greater focus, enhanced
clarity and ease of use. These actions may reduce burden on both the
regulated community and EPA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/23/94 59 FR 60496
Supplemental NPRM 07/22/96 61 FR 37891
Supplemental NPRM 05/16/97 62 FR 27132
Supplemental NPRM Request for
Comment on Alternate Name 04/23/99 64 FR 19958
Final Action Plant-Incorporated
Protectants (PIPs) Under FIFRA 07/19/01 66 FR 37771
Supplemental NPRM Seeks
Additional Comment on Other
Exemptions 07/19/01 66 FR 37855
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2684
The Agency has created a new Agenda entry for the action that is still
pending.
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing; 111 Crop Production; 54171 Research and Development in
the Physical Sciences and Engineering Sciences
Agency Contact: Janet Andersen, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7511C
Phone: 703 308-8128
Fax: 703 308-7026
Elizabeth Milewski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7201, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0699
Fax: 202 260-0949
Email: milewski.elizabeth@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC02
_______________________________________________________________________
3580. DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR PESTICIDE REGISTRATION; TOXICOLOGY, EXPOSURE
AND RESIDUE CHEMISTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) to 136(y)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA will update the data requirements specifically necessary
for the Agency to evaluate the registrability of pesticide products.
The revisions will clarify all data requirements to reflect current
practice. Procedural and explanatory sections of the current
regulations will be amended to make them consistent with the revised
data requirements and new use indexing. EPA intends to accomplish this
revision through a series of proposals, covering different data
disciplines and product types. This proposal is currently limited to
product chemistry, and human health and exposure data requirements for
conventional pesticides.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Product Chemistry and Human
Health portions 02/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2687
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Carol Peterson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703 305-6598
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: peterson.carol@epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5944
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: frane.jean@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC12
[[Page 62332]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3581. TSCA POLICY STATEMENT ON OVERSIGHT OF TRANSGENIC
ORGANISMS (INCLUDING PLANTS)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: As a follow-up to the final Biotechnology rule under the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) EPA intends to address TSCA
oversight of transgenic plants and other organisms. Recent information
indicates that transgenic plants and other organisms are being
developed for uses which appear ot be subject ot TSCA jurisdiction. For
example, plants are being genetically modified to produce industrial
grade, rather than food grade, oils. Many of these plant are subject to
oversight by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture while being tested in the
environment. Following APHIS approval of a petition for nonregulated
status filed pursuant to APHIS' regulations implementing the Federal
Plant Pest Act at 7 CFR part 340, however, these plants cease to be
subject to regulation by USDA. Additionally, transgenic animals that
are not under the jurisdiction of FDA appear to be subject to TSCA.
Such animals may be genetically improved livestock for commercial
purposes. The policy statement would address whether EPA should
exercise jurisdiction under TSCA over such transgenic organisms prior
to their commercial use.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Draft Policy 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4598
Agency Contact: Flora Chow, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3725
Fax: 202 260-0118
Email: chow.flora@epa.gov
James Alwood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1857
Fax: 202 260-0118
Email: alwood.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD53
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3582. TEST RULE; ATSDR SUBSTANCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 42 USC 9604(i) CERCLA 104(i); 42
USC 9601 CERCLA; 15 USC 2611 TSCA 12; 42 USC 7401 112(b)(4) CAA; 42 USC
7412(b)(4) and (b)(1) CAA; 42 USC 7403(d) CAA
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to end
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing a test rule under section 4(a) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) requiring manufacturers and processors of
certain chemicals to fulfill data needs identified by the Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the National Toxicology
Program (NTP), and EPA pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) section 104(i).
Under CERCLA, ATSDR is to establish a list of priority hazardous
substances found at superfund sites, develop toxicological profiles for
the hazardous substances, identify priority data needs, and establish a
research program obtaining the necessary data. This action is a
component of ATSDR's research program.
Data from this action would provide specific information about the
substances for the public and scientific community. The information
would be used in conducting comprehensive public health assessments of
populations living near hazardous waste sites. Scientific data improves
the quality of risk assessments used by EPA, other Federal agencies,
and State and local governments. The risk assessments affect standards,
guidelines, listing/delisting, and other decisions affecting public
health and the environment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2563
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries
Agency Contact: Frank Kover, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8133
Fax: 202 260-3672
Email: kover.frank@epa.gov
Robert Jones, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8150
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: jones.robert@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB79
_______________________________________________________________________
3583. TSCA SECTION 4 ENFORCEABLE CONSENT AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN
OXYGENATED FUEL ADDITIVES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603; 15 USC 2611; 15 USC 2625
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA's Office of Air and Radiation (OAR/EPA) in the
administration of section 211 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), has requested
that OPPT use its TSCA section 4 testing authority to obtain health
effects data on a number of Oxygenated Fuel Additives (OFAs). These
data are
[[Page 62333]]
needed by EPA and others to increase understanding of the toxicity of
these substances individually and in comparison to each other as well
as to other OFAs such as methy t-butyl ether (MTBE).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice To Solicit Interested
Parties 06/00/02
Notice - ECA 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4174
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Charles M. Auer, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3749
Fax: 202 260-8168
Email: auer.charles@epa.gov
George Semeniuk, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2134
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: semeniuk.george@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD28
_______________________________________________________________________
3584. TEST RULE; MULTI-SUBSTANCE RULE FOR THE TESTING OF DEVELOPMENTAL
AND REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603; 15 USC 2607(a); 15 USC 2611; 15 USC 2625
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 799; 40 CFR 704
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing a test rule under section 4 of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) that would require manufacturers, defined
by statute to include importers, and processors of seven (7) substances
to conduct testing for developmental and/or reproductive toxicity. This
is a reproposal of a test rule announced March 4, 1991 (56 FR 9092).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/04/91 56 FR 9092
NPRM Reproposal 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4395
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries
Agency Contact: Catherine Roman, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8155
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: roman.catherine@epa.gov
Frank Kover, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8133
Fax: 202 260-3672
Email: kover.frank@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD44
_______________________________________________________________________
3585. FOLLOW-UP RULES ON EXISTING CHEMICALS
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 TSCA 5; 15 USC 2607 TSCA 8
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 721; 40 CFR 707; 40 CFR 710
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has established a program to monitor the commercial
development of existing chemicals of concern and/or to gather
information to support planned or ongoing risk assessments on such
chemicals. As these chemicals are identified, EPA will initiate
rulemakings under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) sections 5
and/or 8 to require reporting of appropriate needed information by the
manufacturers, importers and/or processors of these chemicals.
Individual proposed or final rules will be published on at least the
chemicals listed below.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 2,4-Pentanedione SNUR 09/27/89 54 FR 39548
NPRM Chloranil 05/12/93 58 FR 27980
NPRM Benzidine-based Chemical
Substances 08/30/95 60 FR 45119
Final Action Benzidine-based
Chemical Substances 10/07/96 61 FR 52287
NPRM Amendment to Benzidine-
based Chemical Substances SNUR 12/00/01
NPRM o-Tolidine & o-Dianisidine-
based Dyes (Benzidine Congener
Dyes) 12/00/01
NPRM Heavy Metal-Based Pigments
in Aerosol Spray Paints SNUR 12/00/01
NPRM Certain Chemical Substances
No Longer in Production SNUR 01/00/02
NPRM Methylcyclopentane SNUR 01/00/02
NPRM 2-Ethoxyethanol & 2-
Methoxyethanol & 2-
Methoxyethanol Acetate 01/00/02
NPRM 2 ,4-Pentanedione SNUR
(Reproposal) 03/00/02
NPRM p-Aminophenol & Bromo-
chloromethane 8(a) Chemical
Specific Rule 04/00/02
Final Action Amendment to
Benzidine-based Chemical
Substances SNUR 06/00/02
Final Action Final Chloranil
SNUR 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 1923
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Barbara Leczynski, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and
[[Page 62334]]
Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3945
Fax: 202 260-1096
Email: leczynski.barbara@epa.gov
Mary Dominiak, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7768
Fax: 202 260-1096
Email: dominiak.mary@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AA58
_______________________________________________________________________
3586. SIGNIFICANT NEW USE RULE; SELECTED FLAME RETARDANT CHEMICAL
SUBSTANCES FOR USE IN RESIDENTIAL UPHOLSTERED FURNITURE
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 TSCA 5
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 721; 40 CFR 707; 40 CFR 710
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under
section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) covering certain
flame retardant chemicals for use in residential upholstered furniture.
The SNUR would require companies wanting to import or manufacture these
chemicals for the significant new uses described in the proposed rule
to submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to the Agency at least 90
days prior to beginning those activities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Flame Retardant Chemicals 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4512
Split from RIN 2070-AA58.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 313 Textile Mills; 337121
Upholstered Household Furniture Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Carolyn Grandson, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1560
Fax: 202 260-1096
Email: grandson.carolyn@epa.gov
John Bowser, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1771
Fax: 202 260-1096
Email: bowser.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD48
_______________________________________________________________________
3587. LEAD-BASED PAINT ACTIVITIES; TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION FOR
RENOVATION AND REMODELING
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 130 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AC83
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3588. TSCA INVENTORY UPDATE RULE AMENDMENTS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 141 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AC61
_______________________________________________________________________
3589. TEST RULE; GENERIC ENTRY FOR ITC RELATED TESTING DECISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 15 USC 2611 TSCA 12
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is requiring testing via rules, or will obtain testing
through enforceable consent agreements (ECAs) or publish a notice which
provides the reasons for not doing so for chemicals listed herein.
These chemicals have been designated for priority testing consideration
by the ITC or recommended for testing consideration (for which the 12-
month statutory requirement does not apply). The list also includes
chemicals or categories of chemicals which have been identified for
testing consideration by other Federal or other EPA offices through EPA
review processes.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM Aryl Phosphates (ITC List
2) 12/29/83 48 FR 57452
NPRM Aryl Phosphates (ITC List
2) 01/17/92 57 FR 2138
NPRM Brominated Flame Retardants06/25/91 56 FR 29140
Final Action-ECA DiBasic Esters
(CPSC) 08/05/99 64 FR 42692
Final Action-ECA 1,1,2-
Trichloroethane (TCE) 06/15/00 65 FR 37550
Final Action-ECA Ethylene
Dichloride (EDC) 12/00/01
Final Action-ECA Maleic
Anhydride 12/00/01
Final Action-ECA Hydrogen
Fluoride 02/00/02
Final Action-ECA Phthalic
Anhydride 04/00/02
Final Action ITC Chemicals (ITC
List 28) 06/00/02
Final Action-ECA Aryl Phosphates
(ITC List 2) 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3493
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Frank Kover, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8133
[[Page 62335]]
Fax: 202 260-3672
Email: kover.frank@epa.gov
David R. Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3468
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: williams.daver@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB94
_______________________________________________________________________
3590. TEST RULE; HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (HAPS)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 42 USC 7412 CAA 112; 42 USC 7403
CAA 103; 15 USC 2611 TSCA 12
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing health effects testing under TSCA section 4
in support of programs and activities required under section 112 of the
Clean Air Act (CAA), governing Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs). Section
112 of the CAA directs EPA to determine the risk to health and the
environment remaining after application of technology-based emissions
standards to major and area sources. Section 112 also sets forth a
mechanism for revising and modifying the statutory list of 189 HAPs
under section 112(b), and requirements for an accidental release
control program. These data will also be important for the right-to-
know program given the large release of these chemicals to the
atmosphere. In order to implement these and other programs and
requirements under section 112, EPA must identify the health and
environment effects of potential concern from exposure to HAPs,
ascertain the minimum data needed to adequately characterize those
health and environmental effects, and assess the risks posed by HAPs.
In addition, under section 103(d), EPA is required to conduct a
research program on the short- and long-term effects of air pollutants
on human health, ascertain the minimum data needed to adequately
characterize those health and environmental effects, and assess the
risks posed by HAPs.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/26/96 61 FR 33178
Supplemental NPRM 12/24/97 62 FR 67466
Supplemental NPRM 04/21/98 63 FR 19694
Final Action 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3487
Supplemental NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/1997/December/Day-24/t33451.htm
Supplemental NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/April/Day-21/a10494.htm
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Richard Leukroth, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0321
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: leukroth.rich@epa.gov
David R. Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3468
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: williams.daver@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC76
_______________________________________________________________________
3591. TEST RULE; CERTAIN HIGH PRODUCTION VOLUME (HPV) CHEMICALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603; 15 USC 2611 to 2612; 15 USC 2625 to 2626
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action is related to a challenge to industry on the eve
of Earth Day, April 21, 1998, to come forward quickly with needed test
data on high production volume (HPV) chemicals. This challenge
encompasses approximately 2,800 chemicals which are manufactured
(including imported) in the aggregate at more than 1 million pounds on
an annual basis. The data needed on these chemicals are: acute
toxicity, repeat dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive
toxicity; mutagenicity ecotoxicity and environmental fate. This rule
will require testing and recordkeeping requirements for certain
chemicals for which industry does not voluntarily agree to provide
testing in a timely manner. The action is part of the Chemical Right-
to-Know Initiative, which is described in the Regulatory Plan. Industry
has volunteered to conduct needed testing on over 2155 of these HPV
chemicals. The first rule proposed testing for 37 unsponsored HPV
chemicals with substantial worker exposure. The proposed rule was
published in the Federal Register on December 26, 2000.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM . 12/26/00 65 FR 81658
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3990
See also the Regulatory Plan entry entitled Chemical Right-to-Know
Initiative (RIN 2070-AD25; SAN 4176).
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Frank Kover, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8133
Fax: 202 260-3672
Email: kover.frank@epa.gov
Keith Cronin, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8157
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: cronin.keith@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD16
_______________________________________________________________________
3592. TEST RULE; IN VITRO DERMAL ABSORPTION RATE TESTING OF CERTAIN
CHEMICALS OF INTEREST TO THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 15 USC 2611 TSCA 12
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 700 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
[[Page 62336]]
Abstract: EPA is requiring manufacturers (which is defined by statute
to include importers) and processors of 38 chemical substances of
interest to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to
conduct testing for in vitro dermal absorption rate testing. These
chemicals, and others, were designated for in vitro dermal absorption
rate testing in the 31st, 32nd, and 35th Reports of the TSCA section
4(e) Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) to the EPA. Each of the
chemical substances included in this proposed rule is produced in an
amount equal to or greater than one million pounds per year. In
addition, each of the chemicals in this proposed rule was identified in
the National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) has having a total
potential worker exposure of greater than 1,000 workers. OSHA has
indicated that it needs quantitative measures of dermal absorption rate
in order to evaluate the potential hazard of these chemicals to
workers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM OSHA Chemicals Dermal
Testing (ITC List 31, 32 & 35) 06/09/99 64 FR 31074
Final Action OSHA Chemical
Dermal Testing 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4425
Please note that this entry was previously identified under RIN 2070-
AB07. TSCA requires EPA to publish the NPRM within one year of ITC
designation.
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Frank Kover, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8133
Fax: 202 260-3672
Email: kover.frank@epa.gov
Keith Cronin, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8157
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: cronin.keith@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD42
_______________________________________________________________________
3593. FOLLOW-UP RULES ON NON-5(E) NEW CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 TSCA sec 5
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 721
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA regulates the commercial development of new chemicals
that have completed premanufacture notice (PMN) review. In a PMN
review, the Agency assesses whether or not a chemical's manufacture,
import, process, distribution, use, or disposal outside the activities
described in the PMN may present an unreasonable risk. EPA will issue
Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) requiring 90-day notification to EPA
from any manufacturer, importer, or processor who would engage in
activities that are designated as significant new uses. Under the
Expedited Follow-up Rule (EFUR) which became effective on October 12,
1989, EPA will identify such new chemicals and publish them in a batch
SNUR 3-4 times per year. Chemicals that were subject to a proposed SNUR
before the effective date of the EFUR or do not qualify under the EFUR,
may be regulated individually by notice and comment rulemaking and are
listed below.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Alkyl & Sulfonic Acid &
Ammonium Salt (84-1056) 06/11/86 51 FR 21199
NPRM 1-Decanimine-N-Decyl-N-
Methyl-N-Oxide (86-566) 12/08/87 52 FR 46496
NPRM Aluminum Cross-linked
Sodium Carboxymethyl- cellulose 06/11/93 58 FR 32628
Final Action Alkyl & Sulfonic
Acid & Ammonium Salt (84-1056) 12/00/01
Final Action 1-Decanimine-N-
Decyl-N-Methyl-N-Oxide (86-566) 12/00/01
Final Action Aluminum Cross-
linked Sodium Carboxymethyl-
cellulose 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 1976
Sectors Affected: 324 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing; 325
Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: James Alwood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-1857
Fax: 202 260-0118
Email: alwood.jim@epa.gov
Flora Chow, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3725
Fax: 202 260-0118
Email: chow.flora@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AA59
_______________________________________________________________________
3594. SIGNIFICANT NEW USE RULE (SNUR); CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC SNURS TO EXTEND
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5(E) ORDERS
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 TSCA sec 5
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: When the Agency determines that uncontrolled manufacture,
import, processing, distribution, use or disposal of a premanufacture
notification (PMN) substance may present an unreasonable risk, it may
issue a section 5(e) consent order to limit these activities. However,
such orders apply only to the PMN submitter. Once the new substance is
entered on the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) chemical inventory,
others can manufacture, import or process the substance without
controls. Therefore, EPA extends the controls to apply to others by
designating manufacture, import or processing of the substances for
uses without the specified controls as significant new
[[Page 62337]]
uses. Under the Expedited Follow-Up Rule, which became effective on
October 10, 1989 (54 FR 31314), EPA routinely publishes batch SNURs
containing routine section 5(e) and non-5(e) SNURs. However, certain
activities, such as modifications, withdrawals, revocations, and SNURs
upon which comments are received in the direct final publication
process, are subject to notice and comment rulemaking and are listed
below.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Batch SNUR: 84-660/-704 &
84-105/-106/-107 & 85-433 05/27/93 58 FR 30744
NPRM Aromatic Amino Ether (P90-
1840) 06/06/94 59 FR 29255
NPRM Alkenyl Ether of
Alkanetriol Polymer (93-458) 12/19/94 59 FR 65289
NPRM Certain Chemical Substances
(91-1299/95-1667 91-1298 91-129706/26/97 62 FR 34421
NPRM Certain Chemical Substances09/09/98 63 FR 48157
Final Action Alkenyl Ether of
Alkanetriol Polymer (93-458) 12/00/01
Final Action Certain Chemical
Substances 12/00/01
Final Action Batch SNUR: 84-660/
-704 & 84-105/-106/-107 & 85-43301/00/02
Final Action Aromatic Amino
Ether (P90-1840) 01/00/02
Final Action Certain Chemical
Substances (91-1299/95-1667 91-
1298 91-1297 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3495
Sectors Affected: 324 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing; 325
Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: James Alwood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-1857
Fax: 202 260-0118
Email: alwood.jim@epa.gov
Flora Chow, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3725
Fax: 202 260-0118
Email: chow.flora@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB27
_______________________________________________________________________
3595. SIGNIFICANT NEW USE RULE; CERTAIN PERFLUOROALKYL SULFONYL (PFOS)
CONTAINING CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 TSCA 5
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 721
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under
section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) covering certain
perfluoroalkyl sulfonyl-containing chemical substances. This SNUR would
require companies who wanted to manufacture or import these chemicals
for the significant new uses described in the proposed rule to submit a
Significant New Use Notice (SNUN) to the Agency at least 90 days prior
to beginning those activities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/18/00 65 FR 62319
Notice of Public Meeting on
Proposed Rule 02/23/01 66 FR 11243
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4475
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mary Dominiak, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-7768
Fax: 202 260-1096
Email: dominiak.mary@epa.gov
Karen Lannon, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2797
Fax: 202 260-1096
Email: lannon.karen@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD43
_______________________________________________________________________
3596. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS); EXEMPTIONS FROM THE PROHIBITIONS
AGAINST MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING, AND DISTRIBUTION IN COMMERCE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605, TSCA sec 6(e)(3)(B)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 6(e)(3)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
provides that the Administrator may grant, by rule, exemptions from the
prohibitions against manufacturing, processing and distribution in
commerce of PCBs upon finding that (1) no unreasonable risk to health
or the environment will occur, and (2) good faith efforts have been
made by the petitioner to develop a substitute for PCB which does not
pose an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. In
addition, the Interim Procedural Rules were amended to require certain
petitioners to reapply for EPA approval to continue PCB activities
previously approved by EPA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM (1) Group I 12/06/94 59 FR 62875
Final Action Group I 09/00/02
NPRM (2) Group II 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2150
Sectors Affected: 211 Oil and Gas Extraction; 2211 Electric Power
Generation, Transmission and Distribution; 31-33 Manufacturing; 5133
Telecommunications; 6113 Colleges, Universities and Professional
Schools; 622 Hospitals; 921 Executive, Legislative, Public Finance and
General Government
Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin, Environmental Protection Agency,
[[Page 62338]]
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3972
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: gimlin.peter@epa.gov
Tony Baney, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3933
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: baney.tony@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB20
_______________________________________________________________________
3597. ACRYLAMIDE; PROHIBITION ON MANUFACTURE, IMPORTATION, DISTRIBUTION
AND USE OF ACRYLAMIDE FOR GROUTING
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 TSCA sec 6; 15 USC 2607 TSCA sec 8
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 764
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On October 2, 1991, EPA proposed a regulation of acrylamide
and NMA grouts based on the unreasonable risk associated with their
usage. EPA's rule would prohibit the manufacture, distribution in
commerce, and use of acrylamide grout. In February 1996, EPA reopened
the record for 30 days to take additional comments, specifically to
seek data on the relative durability of acrylamide and NMA grouts. The
Agency has reviewed the comments and expects to promulgate the final
rule in the Summer of 2002.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/02/91 56 FR 49863
Notice Reopening Record for
Comments on Durability of NMA 02/28/96 61 FR 7454
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2779
Sectors Affected: 23491 Water, Sewer, and Pipeline Construction; 23491
Water, Sewer, and Pipeline Construction; 32519 Other Basic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing; 32519 Other Basic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing; 42269 Other Chemical and Allied Products Wholesalers;
22132 Sewage Treatment Facilities
Agency Contact: John Bowser, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1771
Fax: 202 260-1096
Email: bowser.john@epa.gov
Charles Auer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3749
Fax: 202 260-8168
Email: auer.charles@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC17
_______________________________________________________________________
3598. TSCA SECTION 8(A) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT INFORMATION RULES
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(a) TSCA sec 8(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 712
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: These rules add chemicals to the list of chemicals and
designated mixtures subject to the requirements of the Toxic Substances
Control Act section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rule (40
CFR part 712). These chemicals have been identified by the Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, other EPA offices, and other Federal
agencies, as well as recommended for testing consideration by the
Interagency Testing Committee. Manufacturers and importers are required
to submit exposure-related data (EPA Form No. 7710-35) on the
chemicals. These data will be used to monitor the levels of production,
import and/or processing of these substances and the avenues of human
and environmental exposure to these substances. These data will also
support risk assessment and test rule decisions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 37th ITC List 02/28/96 61 FR 7421
Final Action 38th ITC List 10/29/96 61 FR 55871
Final Action 38th ITC List -
Stay 12/11/96 61 FR 65186
Final Action 38th ITC List -
Stay/Technical Amendments 01/07/98 63 FR 684
Final Action 38th ITC List -
Revocation 01/11/00 65 FR 1548
Final Action 39th ITC List 01/11/00 65 FR 1548
Final Action 41st ITC List 07/05/00 65 FR 41371
Final Action 42nd ITC List 07/24/00 65 FR 45535
Final Action 47th ITC List 07/26/01 66 FR 38955
Final Action 48th ITC List 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 2178
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Paul Campanella, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3948
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: campanella.paul@epa.gov
John R. Harris, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8154
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: harris.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB08
_______________________________________________________________________
3599. TSCA SECTION 8(D) HEALTH AND SAFETY DATA REPORTING RULES
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(d), TSCA sec 8(d)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 716
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: These rules require manufacturers, importers and processors
to submit unpublished health and safety data on chemicals added to the
requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act section 8(d) Health
and Safety Data Reporting Rule (40 CFR part 716). These chemicals
[[Page 62339]]
have been identified by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
other EPA offices, and other Federal agencies, as well as recommended
for testing consideration by the Interagency Testing Committee.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final 38th ITC List 10/29/96 61 FR 55871
Final 38th ITC List - Stay 12/11/96 61 FR 65186
Final 38th ITC List - Stay/
Technical Amendment 01/07/98 63 FR 684
Final Action 38th ITC List -
Revocation 01/11/00 65 FR 1548
Final Action 39th, 41st and 42nd
ITC List 02/00/02
Final Action 47th ITC List 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 1139
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Paul Campanella, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3948
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: campanella.paul@epa.gov
John Harris, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8154
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: harris.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB11
_______________________________________________________________________
3600. LEAD; NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LEAD-BASED PAINT ABATEMENT
ACTIVITIES AND TRAINING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2682 TSCA 402; 15 USC 2687 TSCA 407; PL 102-550
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is issuing this rule under the authority of Section 407
of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to establish notification
procedures for lead abatement professionals (certified under 40 CFR
745.226) conducting lead-based paint activities, and training programs
(accredited under 40 CFR 225) providing lead-based paint activities
courses. Specifically, this rule seeks to establish procedures to
notify the Agency prior to commencement of lead-based paint abatement
activities as required by 40 CFR 745.227(e)(4). In addition, this rule
seeks to establish provisions which would require training programs
accredited under 40 CFR 745.225 to notify the Agency under the
following conditions: 1) prior to providing lead-based paint
activities, training , and 2) following completion of lead-based paint
activities courses. These notification requirements are necessary to
provide EPA compliance monitoring and enforcement personnel with
information necessary to track compliance activity and to prioritize
inspections. This rule supports 40 CFR part 745, subpart L to ensure
that lead abatement professionals who inspect, assess and remove lead-
based paint, dust or soil are well qualified, trained, and certified to
conduct these activities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/22/01 66 FR 7207
Final Action 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4172
Sectors Affected: 611519 Other Technical and Trade Schools
Agency Contact: Doreen Cantor, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-1770
Fax: 202 260-0770
Email: cantor.doreen@epa.gov
Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7873
Fax: 202 260-0770
Email: simpson.julie@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD31
_______________________________________________________________________
3601. LEAD; MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF LEAD-BASED PAINT DEBRIS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 to 2671; 42 USC 6901 to 6992
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Currently, waste derived from lead-based paint (LBP)
abatements is managed under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) hazardous waste regulations. Other Federal agencies (Department
of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Health and Human
Services) and several States and advocacy groups have expressed concern
that the costs associated with the disposal of large volume
architectural components (e.g., doors and windows) may interfere with
abatement activities. EPA's Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances and the Office of Solid Waste have initiated a joint
rulemaking to address the disposal of these architectural components.
This rulemaking would develop disposal standards for these components
under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) title IV, (the definition
of abatement under TSCA title IV, section 401(1)(B), includes
disposal). The TSCA regulations would establish appropriate disposal
standards for LBP architectural components and identify recycling and
incineration activities that would be controlled or prohibited. To
minimize duplication of waste management requirements, EPA is
developing a companion RCRA rule to suspend temporarily hazardous waste
management regulations applicable to lead-based paint debris which will
be subject to the new TSCA standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM TSCA Proposal 12/18/98 63 FR 70189
Extension of Comment Period 02/12/99 64 FR 7158
Extension of Comment Period 02/12/99 64 FR 7159
Final Action 08/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
[[Page 62340]]
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3508
See also RCRA companion rule: Temporary Suspension of Toxicity
Characteristic Rule for Specified Lead-Based Paint Debris (SAN
4263; RIN 2050-AE68),
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TRI/1998/December/Day-18/tri33326.htm,
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TRI/1998/December/Day-18/tri33326.htm
Sectors Affected: 233 Building, Developing and General Contracting;
23321 Single Family Housing Construction; 23332 Commercial and
Institutional Building Construction; 23521 Painting and Wall Covering
Contractors; 23542 Drywall, Plastering, Acoustical and Insulation
Contractors; 23511 Plumbing, Heating and Air-Conditioning Contractors;
23594 Wrecking and Demolition Contractors; 23592 Glass and Glazing
Contractors; 54138 Testing Laboratories; 562111 Solid Waste Collection
Agency Contact: Robert Wright, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-7800
Fax: 202 260-0770
Email: wright.robert@epa.gov
Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7873
Fax: 202 260-0770
Email: simpson.julie@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC72
_______________________________________________________________________
3602. TSCA SECTION 8(E) POLICY; NOTICE OF CLARIFICATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(e) TSCA sec 8(e)
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The TSCA section 8(e) Notice of Clarification and
Solicitation of Public Comment would amend certain aspects of the 1978
TSCA section 8(e) Statement of Interpretation and Enforcement Policy
(1978 Policy Statement). The 1978 Policy Statement describes the types
of information that EPA considers reportable under section 8(e), the
substantial risk reporting provision of TSCA, and describes the
procedures for reporting such information to EPA. This clarification
effort derives from a review of the existing section 8(e) guidance done
in the context of questions raised by companies considering
participating in the section 8(e) Compliance Audit Program (CAP). As a
result of this review, EPA determined that parts of the 1978 Policy
Statement concerning the reportability of information on widespread and
previously unsuspected distribution in environmental media and
emergency incidents of environmental contamination needed some
refinement. The subject Federal Register action solicited comment on
refined reporting guidance concerning widespread and previously
unsuspected distribution in environmental media and provides additional
circumstances where information is not reportable because it is
considered known to the Administrator. Finally, the notice solicited
comments on changes to the section 8(e) reporting deadline and
reaffirmed the standards for claims of confidentiality for information
contained in a notice of substantial risk under section 8(e).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/13/93 58 FR 37735
Final Action 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3118
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Richard Hefter, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7403, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-3470
Fax: 202 260-1216
Email: hefter.richard@epa.gov
Terry O'Bryan, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7403, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3483
Fax: 202 260-1216
Email: obryan.terry@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC80
_______________________________________________________________________
3603. CHEMICAL RIGHT-TO-KNOW INITIATIVE; HIGH PRODUCTION VOLUME (HPV)
CHEMICALS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 142 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2070-AD25
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3604. VOLUNTARY CHILDREN'S CHEMICAL EVALUATION PROGRAM (VCCEP)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 15 USC 2611 TSCA 12; 15 USC 2625
TSCA 26
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has held public meetings to involve stakeholders in the
design and development of a voluntary program to evaluate commercial
chemicals to which children may have a high likelihood of exposure. The
purpose of the voluntary program is to obtain toxicity and exposure
data needed to assess the risk of childhood exposure to commercial
chemicals. EPA launched a pilot of this program on December 26, 2000.
Manufacturers of 20 of the 23 pilot chemicals have volunteered to
sponsor their chemicals in tier 1 in the pilot. If an adequate
voluntary children's chemical
[[Page 62341]]
evaluation program fails to emerge from the stakeholder involvement
process, EPA may proceed with development of a test rule under section
4 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice Initiation of Stakeholder
Process- Notice of Public
Meetings 08/26/99 64 FR 46673
Notice Cancellation of Public
Meeting 01/13/00 65 FR 2163
Notice Stakeholder Involvement
Process - Notice of Public
Meeting 03/29/00 65 FR 16590
Notice Voluntary Children's
Chemical Evaluation Program -
Pilot 12/26/00 65 FR 81700
Notice Phase I Report To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2865
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Ward Penberthy, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, 7405, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1730
Fax: 202 260-8168
Email: penberthy.ward@epa.gov
Catherine Roman, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8155
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: roman.catherine@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC27
_______________________________________________________________________
3605. TEST RULE; CERTAIN METALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 15 USC 2611 TSCA 12; 15 USC 2625
TSCA 26; 42 USC 9604(i) CERCLA 104(i)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to end
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing a test rule under section 4(a) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) requiring manufacturers and processors of
certain metals to fill data needs identified by the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the National Toxicology
Program (NTP), and EPA pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) section 104(I).
Under CERCLA, ATSDR is to establish a list of priority hazardous
substances found at superfund sites, develop toxicological profiles for
the hazardous substances, identify priority data needs, and establish a
research program obtaining the necessary data. This action is a
component of ATSDR's research program. Data from this action would
provide specific information about the substances for the public and
scientific community. The information would be used in conducting
comprehensive public health assessments of populations living near
hazardous waste sites. Scientific data improves the quality of risk
assessments used by EPA, other Federal agencies, and State and local
governments. The risk assessments affect standards, guidelines,
listing/delisting, and other decisions affecting public health and the
environment. The metals are also hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) under
the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112. Data from this action would also
be used to implement several provisions of section 112 of the CAA,
including determining risks remaining after the application of
technology based on standards under section 112(d) of the CAA,
estimating the risks associated with accidental releases, and
determining whether or not substances should be removed from the CAA
section (b)(1) list of HAPs (delisting).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3882
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Frank Kover, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8133
Fax: 202 260-3672
Email: kover.frank@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD10
_______________________________________________________________________
3606. LEAD; REGULATORY INVESTIGATION UNDER THE TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
ACT (TSCA) TO REDUCE LEAD (PB) CONSUMPTION AND USE
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 TSCA 6
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action initiates a regulatory investigation under the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 6 to determine if uses of
lead (Pb) present an unreasonable risk to human health and the
environment. The investigation will involve examination of the
potential sources of human or other exposure to lead throughout the
life cycle. Based on information gathered EPA may propose TSCA section
6(a) rules to control existing or new uses of Pb which pose an
unreasonable risk to human health or the environment, and to explore
the desirability and feasibility of discouraging overall consumption of
Pb in general.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 05/13/91 56 FR 22096
NPRM Proposed Ban of Fishing
Sinkers 03/09/94 59 FR 11122
Final Action Fishing Sinkers 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3252
Agency Contact: Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-7873
Fax: 202 260-0770
Email: simpson.julie@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC21
[[Page 62342]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3607. SIGNIFICANT NEW USE RULE; REFRACTORY CERAMIC FIBERS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 TSCA 5; 15 USC 2605 TSCA 6
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 721
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has instituted a program to monitor the commercial
development of existing chemicals of concern and/or to gather
information to support risk assessments on such chemicals. As these
chemicals are identified, EPA will initiate rulemakings under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) sections 5 and/or 6 to require reporting
by the manufacturers, importers and/or processors of these chemicals.
Proposed rules may be published on at least the chemicals listed on the
timetable below.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Refractory Ceramic Fiber 03/21/94 59 FR 13294
Final Action Refractory Ceramic
Fiber 03/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3528
Sectors Affected: 327999 All Other Miscellaneous Nonmetallic Mineral
Product Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Cindy Fraleigh, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-1537
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: fraleigh.cindy@epa.gov
Peter Gimlin, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3972
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: gimlin.peter@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC37
_______________________________________________________________________
3608. ASBESTOS MODEL ACCREDITATION PLAN REVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2646 TSCA sec 206
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 763
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 28, 1992.
Abstract: The Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act
(ASHARA) amended TSCA to require that EPA revise its asbestos model
accreditation plan (MAP) to extend training and accreditation
requirements to include persons performing certain asbestos-related
work in public or commercial buildings, to increase the minimum number
of training hours required for accreditation purposes and to effect
other changes necessary to implement the amendments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Model Plan 05/13/92 57 FR 20438
Interim Final Rule 02/03/94 59 FR 5236
Final Action 05/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 3148
Sectors Affected: 611519 Other Technical and Trade Schools
Agency Contact: Cindy Fraleigh, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-1537
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: fraleigh.cindy@epa.gov
Tony Baney, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3933
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: baney.tony @epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC51
_______________________________________________________________________
3609. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS); USE AUTHORIZATIONS
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605(e) TSCA sec 6(e)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The notice of proposed rulemaking that was published on
December 6, 1994, covered the manufacture (including import),
processing, distribution in commerce, export use, disposal, and marking
of PCBs. On June 29, 1998, EPA issued a final rule involving the
disposal related provisions. Other provisions, e.g., certain use
authorizations and import provisions, were to be addressed in separate
actions. This rulemaking addresses a use authorization for certain non-
liquid PCB applications, which although currently in use have never
been authorized under the PCB regulations at 40 CFR part 761.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 06/10/91 56 FR 26738
NPRM 12/06/94 59 FR 62788
Final Action 1 PCB Disposal
Provisions 06/29/98 63 FR 35384
NPRM Notice of Data
Availability, Reopening of
Comment Period 12/10/99 64 FR 69358
NPRM Comment Period Extended 04/06/00 65 FR 18018
NPRM Use Authorizations 01/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4179
Sectors Affected: 2211 Electric Power Generation, Transmission and
Distribution; 211 Oil and Gas Extraction; 31-33 Manufacturing; 5133
Telecommunications; 622 Hospitals; 6113 Colleges, Universities and
Professional Schools; 921 Executive, Legislative, Public Finance and
General Government
Agency Contact: Peggy Reynolds, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and
[[Page 62343]]
Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3965
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: reynolds.peggy@epa.gov
Sara McGurk, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1107
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: mcgurk.sara@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD27
_______________________________________________________________________
3610. NOTICE OF TSCA SECTION 4 REIMBURSEMENT PERIOD AND TSCA SECTION
12(B) EXPORT NOTIFICATION PERIOD SUNSET DATES FOR TSCA SECTION 4
SUBSTANCES
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA 4; 15 USC 2611 TSCA 12
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 707; 40 CFR 790; 40 CFR 791; 40 CFR 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is developing a list of substances that are or have been
subject to TSCA section 4 testing actions which required testing under
rules or Enforceable Consent Orders. EPA will identify sunset, or
termination dates that will identify: (1) the end of section 4
reporting requirements (40 CFR 790); (2) the end of the reimbursement
period under which persons subject to test rules are subject to an
obligation to reimburse test sponsors (40 CFR 791); and (3) the end of
the period during which export notification requirements under TSCA
section 12(b) are triggered.
Timetable: Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3559
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Frank Kover, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8133
Fax: 202 260-3672
Email: kover.frank@epa.gov
David R. Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3468
Fax: 202 401-3672
Email: williams.daver@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC84
_______________________________________________________________________
3611. LEAD-BASED PAINT ACTIVITIES; TRAINING, ACCREDITATION, AND
CERTIFICATION RULE AND MODEL STATE PLAN RULE - BUILDING AND STRUCTURES
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 TSCA Title IV; PL 102-550 sec 402; PL 102-
550 sec 404
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, April 28, 1994.
Abstract: The Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992
mandates EPA promulgate regulations governing lead-based paint (LBP)
activities to ensure that individuals engaged in such activities are
properly trained, that LBP training programs are accredited, and that
contractors engaged in such activities are certified. In addition, EPA
must promulgate a Model State program which may be adopted by any State
which seeks to administer and enforce a State Program. EPA promulgated
regulations for training and certification of training programs for LBP
activities and child occupied facilities in 1996 (see 40 CFR 745).
Regulations for LBP activities in public and commercial buildings and
bridges and other structures are still under development.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM (Buildings & Structures) 10/00/04
Final Action (Buildings &
Structures) 10/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4376
Sectors Affected: 23411 Highway and Street Construction; 611519 Other
Technical and Trade Schools
Agency Contact: Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3890
Fax: 202 260-0770
Email: wolf.joel@epa.gov
Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7873
Fax: 202 260-0770
Email: simpson.julie@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC64
_______________________________________________________________________
3612. DISPOSAL OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS: IMPLEMENTATION
ISSUES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(TSCA Section 6)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This proposed regulation will clarify and expand on
implementation issues that have arisen as a result of the publication
of the 1998 PCB Disposal Amendments (63 FR 35384). Topics will include
but not be limited to, Use Authorizations, Natural Gas
Pipelines,Testing and Analysis, Manifesting of PCB Waste, Publication
Process for Validated Alternate Decontamination Solvents and PCB
Analytical Methods and Storage of Dedicated PCB Equipment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
[[Page 62344]]
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4597
Sectors Affected: 92 Public Administration; 22 Utilities; 31-33
Manufacturing; 48-49 Transportation; 53 Real Estate and Rental and
Leasing; 54 Professional, Scientific and Technical Services; 562 Waste
Management and Remediation Services; 81 Other Services (except Public
Administration)
Agency Contact: Cindy Fraleigh, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 260-1537
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: fraleigh.cindy@epa.gov
Laura Casey, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404
Phone: 202 260-1346
Fax: 202 260-1724
Email: casey.laura@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD52
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3613. TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TEST GUIDELINES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603; 15 USC 2611; 15 USC 2625
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 799.9630
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has established a unified library for test guidelines
issued by the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
(OPPTS) for use in testing chemical substances to develop data for
submission to EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), or the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). These test
guidelines represent an Agency effort that began in 1991 to harmonize
the test guidelines within OPPTS, as well as to harmonize the OPPTS
test guidelines with those of the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD). The process for developing and amending these
test guidelines includes public participation and the extensive
involvement of the scientific community, including peer review by the
FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel, the Agency's Science Advisory Board
(SAB) and other expert scientific organizations. In order to ensure
that there is an enforceable test standard for use in a test rule
promulgated under section 4 of TSCA, EPA must promulgate the test
guideline in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The TSCA test
guidelines are consistent with those established as part of the OPPTS
harmonized effort, and codification of the guideline does does not by
itself impose obligations on any person. Obligations are only imposed
when the guideline is subsequently cross referenced in a specific test
rule promulgated under section 4 of TSCA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Rule TSCA Test Guidelines 12/15/00 65 FR 78746
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4490
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries
Agency Contact: Frank Kover, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8133
Fax: 202 260-3672
Email: kover.frank@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD50
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3614. TRI; REVIEW OF CHEMICALS ON THE ORIGINAL TRI LIST
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 1101 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: When TRI was established by Congress in 1986, the statutory
language placed 309 chemicals and 20 categories of chemicals on the TRI
list; that is referred to as the original TRI list. The chemicals on
the original list were taken from two existing lists of toxic
substances: the Maryland Chemical Inventory Report List of Toxic or
Hazardous Substances, and the New Jersey Environmental Hazardous
Substances list. This action constitutes the first systematic review of
toxicology and environmental data for all the chemicals on the original
TRI list to determine whether data for those chemicals conform with the
statutory criteria for listing of chemicals on TRI. Chemicals for which
data do not meet the statutory criteria will be delisted.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/02
Final Action 09/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4015
Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AD18.
AFFECTED SECTORS: Manufacturing industries in SIC codes 20-39 plus the
following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10 except
SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094); Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except SIC
code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939); Commercial
Hazardous Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and Allied
Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169) Petroleum
[[Page 62345]]
Bulk Terminals and Plants (SIC code 5171); and Solvent Recovery
Services (SIC code 7389).
Agency Contact: Steve Devito, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-6185
Fax: 202 401-8142
Email: devito.steve@epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844
Phone: 202 260-0420
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: dombrowski.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA03
_______________________________________________________________________
3615. TRI; REVISIONS TO THE OTHERWISE USE ACTIVITY EXEMPTIONS AND THE
COAL EXTRACTION ACTIVITIES EXEMPTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) requires reporting from
facilities which manufacture or process at least 25,000 pounds of a
listed chemical, or otherwise use 10,000 pounds of a listed chemical.
In determining amounts of listed chemicals that are manufactured,
processed or otherwise used, facilities may be entitled to consider
specific exemptions from reporting. EPA is presently reviewing a group
of these exemptions. The categories of exemptions presently being
reconsidered by EPA are the structural component exemption, the routine
janitorial and facility grounds maintenance exemption, the personal use
exemption, and the motor vehicle maintenance exemption. Also known as
the otherwise use exemptions because they are limited to otherwise use
activities, these exemptions are expressly provided for at 40 CFR
372.38(c). EPA is also considering changes to the coal mining
extraction activities exemption provided for at 40 CFR 372.38(g).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/02
Final Action 10/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4265
Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AD39.
By statute and regulation, this rule will affect SIC codes 20-39, 10
(except SIC codes 1011, 1081, 1094), 12 (except SIC code 1241), 4911,
4931, 4939, 4953, 5169, 5171, and 7389.
Agency Contact: Lawrence A. Reisman, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2301
Fax: 202 401-8142
Email: reisman.larry@epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844
Phone: 202 260-0420
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: dombrowski.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA06
_______________________________________________________________________
3616. TRI: APA PETITION-EPCRA 313 DEFINITION OF OVERBURDEN AS IT RELATES
TO THE MINING INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The regulatory definition for EPCRA section 313 defines
overburden to mean any unconsolidated material that overlies a deposit
of useful material or ores. It does not include any portion of ore or
waste rock. Overburden generally lacks any recoverable materials and
contains only trace amounts of EPCRA section 313 chemicals. Under
section 313, all activities related to overburden are exempt from
threshold determinations and release and other waste management
calculations because overburden contains TRI chemicals in negligible
amounts and reporting is unlikely to provide the public with valuable
information. On December 22, 1998, the National Mining Association
(NMA) petitioned EPA, pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act
(APA) to change the current EPCRA 313 definition of overburden to
include both consolidated material and unconsolidated material. By
making such a change, consolidated material that overlies an ore
deposit would be eligible for the overburden exemption (i.e.,
overburden generally lacks any recoverable minerals and contains only
trace amounts of EPCRA section 313 chemicals). NMA asserts that EPA's
definition of overburden is inconsistent with that of industry. NMA
considers overburden to be all material, both consolidated and
unconsolidated, that overlies an ore deposit of useful material and
must be removed to allow access to ore deposit.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4392
Fomerly listed as RIN 2070-AD41.
Agency Contact: Peter South, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-5997
Fax: 202 401-8142
Email: south.peter@epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844
Phone: 202 260-0420
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: dombrowski.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA08
_______________________________________________________________________
3617. RULEMAKING TO CHANGE TOXICS RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI)
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FROM STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION (SIC)
CODES TO NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published a Federal
[[Page 62346]]
Register Notice of final decision (62 FR 68) to adopt the North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) for the United States.
This rulemaking initates the conversion from TRI Reporting using
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes to TRI Reporting using
NAICS codes. The TRI Program will convert to NAICS without producing
any changes in the facilities that are now subject to TRI reporting.
Therefore, there should be no increased burden resulting from this
action.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4595
Sectors Affected: 212 Mining (except Oil and Gas); 221 Utilities; 562
Waste Management and Remediation Services; 422 Wholesale Trade,
Nondurable Goods
Agency Contact: Judith Kendall, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1802
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: kendall.judith@epamail.epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844
Phone: 202 260-0420
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: dombrowski.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA10
_______________________________________________________________________
3618. CLARIFY TRI REPORTING OBLIGATIONS UNDER EPCRA SECTION
313 FOR THE METAL MINING ACTIVITIES OF EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) currently requires
reporting from metal mining facilities if they manufacture or process
25,000 pounds or more of a listed chemical or otherwise use 10,000
pounds or more of a listed chemical. These mining facilities engage in
the removal of naturally occurring materials from the earth. EPA had
considered naturally occurring materials to be manufactured by natural
processes. A recent court order set aside EPA's interpretation of
manufacture stating that naturally occurring ores can not be
manufactured within the meaning of EPCRA section 313. EPA is
considering clarifying how the definitions of manufacturing and
processing under EPCRA section 313 apply to the mining sector processes
of extraction and beneficiation. In this rule, EPA is also planning to
review the de minimis exemption. This action will not affect the coal
extraction activities exemption.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/02
Final Action 07/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4616
Agency Contact: Marc Edmonds, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0616
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: edmonds.marc@epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844
Phone: 202 260-0420
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: dombrowski.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA11
_______________________________________________________________________
3619. EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT: AMENDMENTS AND
STREAMLINING RULE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11002; 42 USC 11004; 42 USC 11048; 42 USC
11021; 42 USC 11022
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 355; 40 CFR 370
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will address the remaining issues from the proposed
rule of June 8, 1998. (Reporting thresholds for gasoline and diesel
fuel at retail gas stations were included in a separate final rule; 64
FR 7031, February 11, 1999.) A supplemental proposal will address
reporting thresholds for chemicals that pose minimal risk. The final
rule will address: reporting thresholds for rock salt, sand, gravel and
other chemicals that pose minimal risk; plain language rewrite and may
consider reporting thresholds for facilities with some similarities to
gas stations (motor pools, marinas, etc.) and guidance on approaches to
State flexibility.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/08/98 63 FR 31268
Supplemental NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3215
Agency Contact: John Ferris, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-7992
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: ferris.john@epa.gov
Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE17
_______________________________________________________________________
3620. MODIFICATION OF THRESHOLD PLANNING QUANTITY FOR ISOPHORONE
DIISOCYANATE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11002; 42 USC 11004; 42 USC 11048
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 355
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On October 12, 1994 (59 FR 51816), EPA proposed to modify the
listing of several chemicals on the extremely hazardous substances
(EHS) list under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
Act. One petitioner requested the removal of isophorone diisocyanate
(IPDI). EPA rejected the petitioner's request.
[[Page 62347]]
However, in the review of the petition, EPA noticed that there was an
error in the setting of the threshold planning quantity (TPQ) for IPDI,
and proposed to correct the error in the October 12, 1994 notice of
proposed rulemaking. The other modifications to the EHS list were made
final on May 7, 1996; however, the TPQ for IPDI was not included in
that final rule. The goal is to finalize the TPQ for IPDI.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3993
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE43
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3621. TRI; RESPONSES TO PETITIONS RECEIVED TO ADD OR DELETE OR MODIFY
CHEMICAL LISTINGS ON THE TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY
Priority: Routine and Frequent. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11013 EPCRA 313
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: These actions grant or deny petitions received to add or
delete or modify chemicals on the list of toxic chemicals under section
313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA)
that are subject to reporting under the Toxic Chemical Release
Reporting Rule. The actions cover individual chemicals or groups of
chemicals for which petitions have been received.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice DBNPA (Request to Delete)10/27/95 60 FR 54949
NPRM Chromite Ore from Transvaal
Reg. of S.A. 02/23/99 64 FR 8775
NPRM Diisononyl phthalate (DINP)
(Request to Add) 09/05/00 65 FR 53681
Final Action Chromite Ore from
Transvaal Reg. of S.A. 05/11/01 66 FR 24066
Final Response DBNPA (Request to
Delete) 01/00/02
Response Chromium, Antimony,
Titanite Petition 02/00/02
Final Action Diidononyl
phthalate (DINP), Request To Add03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 2425
Fomerly listed as RIN 2070-AC00.
Statutory deadline: Within 180 days of receipt the Agency must either
initiate rulemaking or explain why not in the Federal Register.
Manufacturing industries in SIC codes 20-39 plus the following
industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10 except SIC codes
1011, 1081, and 1094); Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except SIC code 1241);
Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939); Commercial Hazardous
Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and Allied Products-
Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants (SIC
code 5171); and, Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389).
Agency Contact: Daniel R. Bushman, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3882
Fax: 202 401-8142
Email: bushman.daniel@epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844
Phone: 202 260-0420
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: dombrowski.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA00
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3622. TRI; CHEMICAL EXPANSION; FINALIZATION OF DEFERRED CHEMICALS
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11013 EPCRA 313; 42 USC 11023; 42 USC 11048; 42
USC 11076
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On November 30, 1994, EPA added 286 chemicals and chemical
categories to the EPCRA section 313 list, including 39 chemicals as
part of two delineated categories. Each chemical and chemical category
was found to meet the statutory criteria described in EPCRA section
313(d)(2)(A) to (C). At this time, EPA deferred final action on 40
chemicals and one chemical category until a later date. These were
deferred because the comments received on them raised difficult
technical or policy issues which required additional time to address.
EPA chose not to delay final action on the 286 chemicals and chemical
categories because of the additional time needed to address the
[[Page 62348]]
issues surrounding the smaller group of 40 chemicals and one chemical
category; rather, EPA believed it to be in the spirit of community
right-to-know to proceed with the final rulemaking of the additional
chemicals and chemical categories.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/12/94 59 FR 1788
Supplemental NPRM Deferred
Chemicals 12/00/02
Final Action Deferred Chemicals 12/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3007
Fomerly listed as RIN 2070-AC47.
Includes SIC codes: Manufacturing industries in SIC codes 20-39 plus
the following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10
except SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094); Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except
SIC code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939);
Commercial Hazardous Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and
Allied Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and
Plants (SIC code 5171); and, Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389).
Sectors Affected: 42269 Other Chemical and Allied Products Wholesalers
Agency Contact: Daniel R. Bushman, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3882
Fax: 202 401-8142
Email: bushman.daniel@epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844
Phone: 202 260-0420
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: dombrowski.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA01
_______________________________________________________________________
3623. TRI; POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11013 Pollution Prevention Act
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 6607(b) of the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA)
(Pub. L. 101-508) requires the addition of several data elements to the
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI) reporting requirements as
promulgated under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) (Pub. L. 99-499). Section 313 of
EPCRA requires owners or operators of certain facilities that
manufacture, process, or otherwise use listed toxic chemicals to
annually report their releases of these chemicals to each environmental
medium. The PPA mandates that section 313 covered facilities also
report on source reduction and recycling activities relating to the
toxic chemicals beginning with the 1991 reporting year. Since 1991
covered facilities have been providing this information to EPA in
section 8, Source Reduction and Recycling Activities, of EPA Form R. On
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48475), EPA proposed regulations which would
provide definitions and instructions for reporting the PPA data
elements on the EPA Form R. In this action, EPA will amend certain
aspects of the September 25, 1991, proposed rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/25/91 56 FR 48475
Supplemental NPRM To Be Determined
Response To Be Determined
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 2847
Fomerly listed as RIN 2070-AC24.
Affected Sectors Include: Manufacturing industries in SIC codes 20-39
plus the following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10
except SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094); Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except
SIC code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939);
Commercial Hazardous Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and
Allied Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and
Plants (SIC code 5171); and, Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389).
Agency Contact: John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Environmental Information, 2844
Phone: 202 260-0420
Fax: 202 401-0237
Email: dombrowski.john@epa.gov
Amy Newman, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental
Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1846
Fax: 202 401-8142
Email: newman.amy@epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA09
_______________________________________________________________________
3624. RESPONSE TO A PETITION REQUESTING DELETION OF PHOSMET FROM THE
EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (EHS) LIST
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11002; 42 USC 11004; 42 USC 11048
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 355
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has received a petition to remove Phosmet from the
extremely hazardous substance (EHS) list under the Emergency Planning
and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). This rulemaking will address
the petitioner's claims.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3994
Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epa.gov
John Ferris, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5104A
Phone: 202 564-7992
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: ferris.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE42
[[Page 62349]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3625. LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS; POTENTIAL REVISIONS FOR MERCURY LISTED
AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6924
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 268
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In May 1999, EPA published an Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking that described the issues the Agency has with the current
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) treatment standards for mercury
bearing hazardous wastes. Based on the comments received on this ANPRM
as well as other information the Agency has collected, we are now
conducting a series of mercury treatability studies in conjunction with
DOE. The data from these studies will be presented in a Notice of
Availability (NODA). These data are from a number of treatment vendors,
treating several different types of mercury wastes. In addition to
examining TCLP data, we are also looking at alternative leaching
methodologies and other factors which might affect long-term stability
of the treated wasteforms.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 05/28/99 64 FR 28949
NoDA 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4094
Sectors Affected: 325181 Alkalies and Chlorine Manufacturing; 3353
Electrical Equipment Manufacturing; 3254 Pharmaceutical and Medicine
Manufacturing; 32551 Paint and Coating Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mary Cunningham, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8453
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: cunningham.mary@epa.gov
John Austin, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0436
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: austin.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE54
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3626. REMOVAL OF REQUIREMENT TO USE SW-846 METHODS (TEST METHODS FOR
EVALUATING SOLID WASTE: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL METHODS)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921-6927; 42 USC
6930; 42 USC 6934-6939; 42 USC 6974; 42 USC 9601; 42 USC 9614(c)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR
265; 40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 270; 40 CFR 279
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has been actively working to break down the barriers that
the environmental monitoring community faces when trying to use new
monitoring techniques. As a first step, EPA has accelerated its review
process for new methods by eliminating several unnecessary internal
review steps, and by streamlining the internal approval process for
each new method. However, there are currently 32 citations in title 40
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) where the use of SW-846
methods is required. As a second step for speeding up the approval
process, EPA plans to remove the requirements to use SW-846 methods for
other than method defined parameters (i.e., where the method defines
the regulations, such as the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure) from 40 CFR. This will likely lead to an even more
streamlined approval process since SW-846 will then be able to be
handled strictly as guidance and not need the regulatory process for
approval. This additional streamlining will permit new, more cost-
effective methods to attain public and regulatory authority acceptance
in much less time, allowing required monitoring to be done more
cheaply, faster and, in some cases, more accurately.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3989
Agency Contact: Kim Kirkland, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0490
Fax: 703 308-0511
Email: kirkland.kim@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE41
_______________________________________________________________________
3627. STANDARDIZED PERMIT FOR RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42
USC 6927; 42 USC 6939; 42 USC 6974
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 267; 40 CFR 270
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering creating a new type of general permit,
called a standardized permit, for facilities that generate waste and
routinely manage the waste on-site in tanks, containers, and
containment buildings. Under the standardized permit, facility owners
and operators would certify compliance with generic design and
operating conditions set on a national basis. The permitting agency
would review the certifications submitted by the facility owners and
operators. The permitting agency would also be able to impose
additional site-specific terms and conditions for corrective action or
other purposes, as called for by RCRA. Ensuring compliance with the
standardized permit's terms and conditions would occur during
inspection of the facility after the permit has been issued. The
standardized permit should streamline the permit process by allowing
facilities
[[Page 62350]]
to obtain and modify permits more easily while maintaining the
protectiveness currently existing in the individual RCRA permit
process. This proposal also raises issues for public comment on how all
facilities receiving RCRA permits can satisfy RCRA corrective action
requirements under appropriate alternative state cleanup programs and
on financial assurance issues.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/12/01 66 FR 52191
NPRM Comment Period End 12/11/01
Final Action 10/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4028
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 3251 Basic Chemical
Manufacturing; 3252 Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial and
Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing; 325211 Plastics Material
and Resin Manufacturing; 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural
Chemical Manufacturing; 32551 Paint and Coating Manufacturing; 332813
Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing and Coloring
Agency Contact: Vernon Myers, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5303W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8660
Fax: 703 308-8609
Email: myers.vernon@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE44
_______________________________________________________________________
3628. NESHAPS: STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR HAZARDOUS
WASTE COMBUSTORS-PHASE II COVERING BOILERS AND CERTAIN INDUSTRIAL
FURNACES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6924 RCRA sec 3004; 42 USC 6925 RCRA sec 3005;
42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112; 42 USC 7414 CAA sec 114
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265;
40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 270
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, May 15, 2002, Settlement agreement for
boilers and other industrial furnaces. Seeking extension.
Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is required to establish
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for
most hazardous waste combustors (HWCs) (i.e., incinerators, cement
kilns, boilers, and some types of smelting furnaces). In addition,
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA is
required to establish standards for all HWCs as necessary to ensure
protection of human health and the environment. EPA is concerned that
its current RCRA standards for HWCs may not be adequately protective
given that the standards do not take into account indirect pathways of
exposure and that there have been advances both in risk assessment and
control technologies since promulgation of the current standards. The
Agency is in the process of developing a proposal to address boilers
and possibly other industrial furnaces, which combust hazardous wastes.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Cement Kilns & Lightweight
Aggregate Kilns & Incinerators 04/19/96 61 FR 17358
Final Action MACT Fasttrack 06/19/98 63 FR 33782
Final Action Cement Kilns &
LWAKs & Incinerators (Final-
Phase I) 09/30/99 64 FR 52828
NPRM Boilers & Other Industrial
Furnaces (Phase II) 07/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3333
For information on the Phase I portion of this effort, see SAN 4418,
RIN 2050-AE79.
Sectors Affected: 2123 Non-Metallic Mineral Mining and Quarrying; 2211
Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution; 22132 Sewage
Treatment Facilities; 3241 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing;
3271 Clay Product and Refractory Manufacturing; 3231 Printing and
Related Support Activities; 3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing; 3252
Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial and Synthetic Fibers and
Filaments Manufacturing; 3253 Pesticide, Fertilizer and Other
Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 3254 Pharmaceutical and Medicine
Manufacturing; 3255 Paint, Coating, Adhesive, and Sealant
Manufacturing; 3259 Other Chemical Product Manufacturing; 3271 Clay
Product and Refractory Manufacturing; 3273 Cement and Concrete Product
Manufacturing; 3274 Lime, Gypsum and Gypsum Product Manufacturing; 3279
Other Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing; 3327 Machine Shops,
Turned Product, and Screw, Nut and Bolt Manufacturing; 3328 Coating,
Engraving, Heat Treating and Allied Activities; 3329 Other Fabricated
Metal Product Manufacturing; 3332 Industrial Machinery Manufacturing;
3335 -; 3339 Other General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing; 3341
Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing; 3342 Communications
Equipment Manufacturing; 3343 Audio and Video Equipment Manufacturing;
3344 Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing; 3361
Motor Vehicle Manufacturing; 3362 Motor Vehicle Body and Trailer
Manufacturing; 3363 Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing; 4227 Petroleum
and Petroleum Products Wholesalers; 45431 Fuel Dealers; 5622 Waste
Treatment and Disposal; 5629 Remediation and Other Waste Management
Services
Agency Contact: Rhonda Minnick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8771
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: minnick.rhonda@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE01
_______________________________________________________________________
3629. OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE BURDEN REDUCTION PROJECT
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 134 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2050-AE50
_______________________________________________________________________
3630. MODIFICATIONS TO RCRA RULES ASSOCIATED WITH SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED
SHOP TOWELS AND WIPES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6921
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
[[Page 62351]]
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would modify RCRA rules that impact the
management of solvent-contaminated shop towels and wipes. Solvent-
contaminated shop towels and wipes are used throughout industry for
equipment cleaning and other related facility operations. The spent
shop towels and wipes can be hazardous wastes when the solvent used is
either a characteristic or listed solvent. An examination of industry
use and management practices reveals that many facilities may use only
small amounts of solvent on their disposable wipes, and use small
numbers of wipes daily -- suggesting that these materials may sometimes
pose little or no risk to human health and the environment if disposed
in municipal landfills. Similarly, situations exist where both
disposable wipes and reusable shop towels are not being managed
according to prescribed Federal and States' rules and policies.
Problems with this issue have persisted since the late 1980s.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4091
Sectors Affected: 323 Printing and Related Support Activities; 325
Chemical Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing; 333
Machinery Manufacturing; 334 Computer and Electronic Product
Manufacturing; 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 337
Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing; 441 Motor Vehicle and
Parts Dealers; 811 Repair and Maintenance; 812 Personal and Laundry
Services
Agency Contact: Jim O'Leary, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8827
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: oleary.jim@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE51
_______________________________________________________________________
3631. RECYCLING OF CATHODE RAY TUBES (CRTS) AND MERCURY-CONTAINING
EQUIPMENT: CHANGES TO HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 135 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2050-AE52
_______________________________________________________________________
3632. REVISIONS TO SOLID WASTE LANDFILL CRITERIA--LEACHATE RECIRCULATION
ON ALTERNATIVE LINERS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6944; 42 USC 6949a
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA plans to propose a rule to allow leachate recirculation
over alternative liner systems which meet the performance standard
specified by the municipal solid waste landfill (MSWLF) criteria. The
performance determination would be made by the state director of an
approved MSWLF program. EPA also plans to propose a new section to the
MSWLF criteria which will allow the alternative of clean closure of
landfills rather than require the installation of a landfill cap, which
would allow the solid waste in the MSWLF to be totally removed from the
site and be properly disposed of at another site. Finally, EPA plans to
propose an additional factor to 258.54 for determining the frequency of
ground water monitoring for the detection monitoring program specified
in this subpart. The additional factor for consideration concerns liner
performance where there is some direct system for determining liner
performance. However, the minimum monitoring frequency would still be
no less than once a year as stated in the existing regulation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NODA Request for Information and
Data 04/06/00 65 FR 18014
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4230
Sectors Affected: 562 Waste Management and Remediation Services
Agency Contact: Dwight Hlustick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8647
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: hlustick.dwight@.epa.gov
Deborah Hanlon, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-5824
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: hanlon.deborah@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE67
_______________________________________________________________________
3633. AMENDMENTS TO THE CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT RULE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6901 et.seq.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 271
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, August 7, 2000, Settlement agreement
calls for proposal to be signed by 08/07/2000.
Final, Judicial, October 8, 2001, Settlement agreement calls for final
to be signed by 10/8/2001.
Abstract: EPA has proposed and is proposing amendments seeking
extension to the existing RCRA Corrective Action Management Unit (CAMU
Regulation (at 40 CFR 264.552). CAMUs are used for managing remediation
wastes onsite during the course of implementing corrective action or
cleanup at a facility. CAMUs can promote cleanups by allowing a broader
range of cleanup activities than are allowed under the other hazardous
waste management regulations. Upon finalization, the amendments would
add more detail to the treatment and technical standards for management
of cleanup wastes in CAMUs.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/22/00 65 FR 51079
Supplemental NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
[[Page 62352]]
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4419
Agency Contact: Patricia Buzzell, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8632
Fax: 703 308-8617
Email: buzzell.tricia@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE77
_______________________________________________________________________
3634. REGULATION OF OIL BEARING WASTES FROM PETROLEUM REFINERIES
GASIFIED TO PRODUCE SYNTHESIS GAS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922;
42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42 USC 6926; 42 USC 6927; 42 USC
6930; 42 USC 6934; 42 USC 6935; 42 USC 6937; 42 USC 6938; 42 USC 6939;
...
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 261
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
propose revisions to the RCRA solid waste regulations to exclude oil-
bearing secondary materials, generated by the petroleum refining
industry, from the definition of solid waste if the materials are
destined to be processed in a gasification device manufacturing
synthesis gas fuel. We are planning to propose this exclusion in order
to clarify and simplify RCRA jurisdiction, and to be consistent with
other comparable existing exclusions. In this notice, we are also
soliciting comment on an option to extend the exclusion to organic
containing secondary materials generated by industries (other than the
petroleum refining industry).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/20/95 60 FR 57747
Interim Notice of Data
Availability 04/08/97 62 FR 16747
Notice of Data Availability and
Request for Comment 07/15/98 63 FR 38139
Final Action 08/06/98 63 FR 42110
Final Action Technical
Amendments 10/09/98 63 FR 54356
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4411
This is an extension of a previous notice that contained the following
RIN 2050-AD88.
Agency Contact: Elaine Eby, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8449
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: eby.elaine@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE78
_______________________________________________________________________
3635. REVISION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT EXEMPTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE
MIXTURES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a); 6921; 6922; 6924; 6926
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A)-(E)(Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is looking into proposing to add up to four solvents
(benzene, 2-ethoxyethanol, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, and 2-nitropropane)
to the hazardous waste exemptions for mixtures of spent solvents in
wastewater treatment plants (headworks rule) at 40 CFR
261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A)-(B). Spent solvents are solvents that have been used
and are no longer fit for use without being regenerated, reclaimed, or
otherwise processed. In addition, EPA is considering proposing: (1)
changes to implementation of rule from using mass balance only, to
choice of using direct monitoring; (2) adding certain leachates to
allowed categories of wastestreams; and (3) revising other provisions
of rule, such as de minimis quantities and the definition of point of
application of exemption.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM - Revisions for Wastewater
Treatment Exemptions 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4501
Sectors Affected: 31-33 Manufacturing; 562 Waste Management and
Remediation Services
Agency Contact: Ron Josephson, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0442
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: josephson.ron@epa.gov
Tracy Atagi, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8672
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: atagi.tracy@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE84
_______________________________________________________________________
3636. MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL LOCATION RESTRICTIONS
FOR AIRPORT SAFETY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6902(a); 42 USC 6907; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC
6944; 42 USC 6945(c); 42 USC 6949(c)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258.10(e) and (f)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The direct final rule would amend the municipal solid waste
landfill (MSWLF) location restrictions for airport safety by adding
location restrictions to conform with those contained in the Wendell H.
Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century. The rule
would prohibit the construction or establishment of a new MSWLF within
six miles of a public airport (1) that has received grants under the
Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, as amended, and (2) that is
primarily designed for 60 passengers or less. MSWLFs in the State of
Alaska are exempt. Because new MSWLFS are subject to the statutory
location restrictions in addition to regulatory location restrictions
currently in effect under 40 CFR 258.10, EPA is promulgating the rule
amendment to prevent confusion regarding applicable location
restrictions for MSWLFs for airport safety purposes, as well as to
notify affected entities of these statutory restrictions. EPA is also
proposing a parallel rule identical to this direct final action in
order to
[[Page 62353]]
provide opportunity for comment on the rule, although we view the
action as noncontroversial and do not anticipate any adverse comments.
The regulated entities are expected to be: (1) Federal agencies and
State, local, municipal and tribal governments constructing or
establishing new MSWLFs within six miles of a public airport and (2)
industries involved in constructing or establishing new landfills
within six miles of a public airport.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4575
Sectors Affected: 23 Construction; 5622 Waste Treatment and Disposal;
56221 Waste Treatment and Disposal; 562212 Solid Waste Landfill
Agency Contact: Mary T. Moorcones, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 540 338-1348
Fax: 540 338-5547
Email: moorcones.mary@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE91
_______________________________________________________________________
3637. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION PERMITS FOR
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6944; 42 USC 6949a
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA plans to issue a direct final rule adding a new section
to the Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (MSWLF) to allow
states to issue research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) permits
for landfill operations at variance with some parts of the criteria, as
long as it is demonstrated that these operations will not result in an
increased risk to human health and the environment. Waivers of location
restrictions, groundwater monitoring, corrective action requirements,
the financial assurance criteria, and explosive gases control would not
be allowed by this action. EPA is considering this alternative to
stimulate new technologies and alternatives in the landfilling of
municipal solid waste.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NoDA Request for Information and
Data 04/06/00 65 FR 18014
NPRM 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 4588
Split from RIN 2050-AE67.
Sectors Affected: 562 Waste Management and Remediation Services
Agency Contact: Dwight Hlustick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8647
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: hlustick.dwight@.epa.gov
Deborah Hanlon, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-5824
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: hanlon.deborah@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE92
_______________________________________________________________________
3638. REVISIONS FOR TRANSBOUNDARY SHIPMENTS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE FOR RECOVERY WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND
DEVELOPMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6901 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262 subpart H (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency is considering changing the existing regulation 40
CFR 262 subpart H, which regulates transboundary movement of hazardous
waste within all countries that are members of the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This regulation would be
amended to comply with changes passed by the OECD Council. Existing
waste lists may be restructured to comply with the new OECD waste
lists. As such, previously existing waste lists may be renamed
according to adopted OECD terminology. Shipments of small waste amounts
destined for laboratory analysis may be exempted from filing certain
paperwork requirements that are otherwise required. A certificate of
recovery may be required upon final recovery of wastes and timeframes
for recovery operations may be changed to reflect the decisions made by
the OECD Council.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Revisions for Transboundary
Shipments of Hazardous Waste 09/00/02
Direct Final Rule Revisions for
Transboundary Shipments of
Hazardous Waste 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4606
Agency Contact: Rick Picardi, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8879
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: picardi.rick@epa.gov
Frank McAlister, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, OS-341, 5304W
Phone: 703 308-8196
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: mcalister.frank@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE93
_______________________________________________________________________
3639. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
MILLERSVILLE LANDFILL, SEVERN, MARYLAND
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6945; 42 USC 6949)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Anne Arundel County proposes to demonstrate that a
[[Page 62354]]
bioreactor with an alternative liner system is as effective, or
superior to a bioreactor with the standard composite liner currently
allowed by regulations. The main goal of this project is to deliver
superior environmental performance (SEP) by capturing the additional
airspace gained by accelerated decomposition of the waste. This
benefits the County and its citizens by prolonging the life of the
landfill and thereby postponing the siting of new solid waste
management facilities, with their attendant social impacts,
environmental impacts, and economic costs. Environmental benefits of
this project include: (1) reduced need for construction of new
landfills and corresponding reduction (or elimination) of the land,
air, and water impacts associated with landfill construction; (2)
decreased concentration of most leachate constituents as cycling of
leachate removes or reduces contaminants; (3) reduction in the amount
of leachate requiring pretreatment; (4) reduction in the amount of
leachate that the facility discharges to the local wastewater treatment
plant, and subsequent discharge of effluent to the Patuxent River; and
(5) reduction in post-closure care, maintenance and risk (bioreactor
landfills minimize long-term environmental risk and liability due to
the controlled settlement of the solid waste during landfill operation,
low potential for leachate migration into the subsurface environment,
and the recovery of landfill gas during operation).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 4534
Agency Contact: Sherri Walker, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1802, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-4295
Fax: 202 260-3125
Email: walker.sherri@epa.gov
Dwight Hlustick, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 5306W
Phone: 703 308-8647
Email: hlustick.dwight@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA25
_______________________________________________________________________
3640. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR IMPLEMENTING
WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS AT TWO VIRGINIA LANDFILLS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6945; 42 USC 6949
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Virginia Landfills XL project includes two solid waste
municipal landfills (SWMLF) operated by subsidiaries of Waste
Management Inc. (WMI): Maplewood Recycling and Waste Disposal Facility
is located in Amelia County, Virginia, approximately 30 miles southwest
of Richmond, and King George County Landfill and Recycling Center is
located approximately 50 miles north-northeast of Richmond. Both
landfills accept municipal solid waste and a small percentage of
biodegradable products (e.g., construction debris). Through this XL
project, the Maplewood and King George landfills propose to implement
two variations of bioreactor landfill systems and compare the relative
improvement in landfill performance at the two different bioreactor
project sites. In a bioreactor landfill, controlled quantities of
liquids are added and circulated through waste to accelerate the
natural biodegradation rate of waste and therefore decrease the waste
stabilization and composting time compared to a conventional landfill.
The Maplewood bioreactor will recirculate liquids (primarily leachate)
generated at the facility. The King George bioreactor will recirculate
facility-generated leachate plus other liquids, such as non-hazardous
liquid waste or storm water. These activities collectively should
decrease emissions of landfill gas, accelerate waste decomposition,
improve leachate quality, and increase the waste capacity of the
existing landfills.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4608
Agency Contact: Sherri L. Walker, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of the Administrator, 1807, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-4295
Fax: 202 260-3125
Email: walker.sherri@epa.gov
Dwight Hlustick, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 5306W
Phone: 703 308-8647
Email: hlustick.dwight@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA30
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3641. PAINT MANUFACTURING WASTES LISTING: HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM: IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321; 33 USC 1361; 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a);
42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6926; 42 USC 6938; 42 USC 9602; 42 USC
9603; 42 USC 9604
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 302; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR
265
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, January 28, 2001, Administrator signed
proposal on 1/25/2001.
Final, Judicial, March 30, 2002.
Abstract: This action addresses the potential risks posed by wastes
from the production of paints, and determines whether these wastes
should be listed as hazardous under RCRA to control any potentially
unacceptable risks. Any new wastes listed as hazardous will also be
added to the CERCLA list of hazardous substances. This action will be
[[Page 62355]]
implemented by EPA and States authorized under RCRA. Impacts on local
governments are not expected. Specific wastes to be addressed are
water/caustic cleaning wastes, solvent cleaning wastes, emission
control dusts/sludges, wastewater treatment sludges, and off-spec
product.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/13/01 66 FR 10060
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3805
Agency Contact: Patricia Cohn, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8675
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: cohn.patricia@epa.gov
Katrin Kral, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-6120
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: kral.katrin@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE32
_______________________________________________________________________
3642. LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE; INORGANIC CHEMICAL WASTES; LAND
DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FOR NEWLY LISTED WASTES; CERCLA HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES REPORTABLE QUANTITIES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6901 to 6992(k)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 263; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR
268; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 302
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, August 30, 2000, Administrator signed
8/30/00.
Final, Judicial, October 31, 2001.
Abstract: EPA, under an Environmental Defense Fund settlement
agreement, proposed to amend the regulations for hazardous waste
management under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to
reduce hazards to human health and the environment for three wastes
from the manufacturing of inorganic chemicals. EPA also proposed to add
manganese to 40 CFR 261, Appendix VII and VIII; the 40 CFR 268 UTS
table; and the F039 landfill leachate listing. Under the settlement
agreement, EPA reviewed the wastes from 14 inorganic chemical
manufacturing sectors including: sodium dichromate production, the dry
process for manufacturing phosphoric acid, phosphorus trichloride
production, phosphorus pentasulfide production, the production of
sodium phosphate from wet process phosphoric acid, sodium chlorate
production, antimony oxide production, cadmium pigments production,
barium carbonate production, potassium dichromate production, phenyl
mercuric acetate production, boric acid production, inorganic hydrogen
cyanide production, and titanium dioxide production (except for
chloride process waste solids). EPA published a proposal on September
14, 2000. The rule was proposed under the authority of section
3001(e)(2) of RCRA which directs EPA to make hazardous waste listing
determinations for inorganic chemical manufacturing wastes. The FR
notice proposes to list as hazardous three specific wastes under 40 CFR
part 261: (1) baghouse filters from the production of antimony oxide;
(2) slag from the production of antimony oxide that is disposed of or
speculatively accumulated; and (3) nonwastewaters from the production
of titanium dioxide by the chloride-ilmenite process. The remaining
wastes evaluated in the rule were proposed to not be listed as
hazardous wastes. EPA has evaluated public comments on the proposal and
will issue a final rule. This action will include final Land Disposal
Restrictions for the final listed wastes. Where possible, newly listed
wastes will be given CERCLA Hazardous Substance Designation and
Reportable Quantities assigned.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/14/00 65 FR 55684
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4083
Sectors Affected: 325188 All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical
Manufacturing; 325131 Inorganic Dye and Pigment Manufacturing; 331419
Primary Smelting and Refining of Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and
Aluminum)
Agency Contact: Sue Burnell, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8653
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: burnell.sue@epa.gov
Gwen DiPietro, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8285
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: dipietro.gwen@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE49
_______________________________________________________________________
3643. REVISIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE GUIDELINE FOR PROCUREMENT OF
PRODUCTS CONTAINING RECOVERED MATERIALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a) RCRA sec 6002(e)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 247
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: RCRA section 6002 and E.O. 13101 require EPA to prepare
guidelines in the Federal Register which designate items that are or
can be made with recovered materials and to issue recommendations for
government procurement of these items. Once designated, procuring
agencies are required to purchase these items with the highest
percentage of recovered materials practicable. Government procurement
of EPA-designated items containing recovered materials fosters markets
for recovered materials and, thereby, closes the recycling loop. To
date, EPA has designated 54 items under three Comprehensive Procurement
Guidelines (CPG1, CPG2 and CPG3). EPA has also issued a Recovered
Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN) with each CPG which provides
recommendations on buying the designated items. The E.O. requires EPA
to update the CPG every two years. The newest action issues final item
designations in CPG4.
[[Page 62356]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice -- Paper Products
Recovered Materials Advisory
Notice 06/08/98 63 FR 31214
Notice -- Recovered Materials
Advisory Notice I Update 06/08/98 63 FR 31217
NPRM (CPG3 and RMAN 3) 08/26/98 63 FR 45558
Notice of Availability of Final
Document 01/19/00 65 FR 3082
Final Action (CPG3 and RMAN 3) 01/19/00 65 FR 3069
NPRM (CPG4 and RMAN 4) 08/28/01 66 FR 45256
Final Action (CPG4 and RMAN 4) 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3545
NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WASTE/1998/August/Day-26/f22793.htm
Sectors Affected: 92111 Executive Offices; 92119 All Other General
Government
Agency Contact: Terry Grist, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7257
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: grist.terry@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE23
_______________________________________________________________________
3644. REQUIREMENTS FOR ZINC FERTILIZER MADE FROM RECYCLED HAZARDOUS
SECONDARY MATERIALS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 145 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2050-AE69
_______________________________________________________________________
3645. NESHAPS: STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR HAZARDOUS
WASTE COMBUSTORS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6924 RCRA sec 3004; 42 USC 6925 RCRA sec 3005;
42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112; 42 USC 7414 CAA sec 114
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265;
40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 270
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is required to establish
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for
most hazardous waste combustors (HWCs) (i.e., incinerators, cement
kilns, boilers, and some types of recovery furnaces). In addition,
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA is
required to establish standards for all HWCs as necessary to ensure
protection of human health and the environment. Consequently, the
Agency established in the HWC Maximum Achievable Control Technology
(MACT) rule new emissions standards for cement kilns, lightweight
aggregate kilns, and incinerators under CAA authority on September 30,
1999 (64 FR 52828). Following promulgation, issues were raised by the
regulated community through informal comments and through litigation.
In response, EPA proposed changes to and clarifications to certain
provisions of the final Phase I rule. EPA is currently working on the
final rule for these changes and clarifications.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Cement Kilns & Lightweight
Aggregate Kilns & Incinerators 04/19/96 61 FR 17358
Final Action MACT Fasttrack 06/19/98 63 FR 33782
Final Action Cement Kilns &
LWAKs & Incinerators (Final-
Phase I) 09/30/99 64 FR 52828
NPRM Phase I Amendments 07/03/01 66 FR 35126
Final (Good Cause) Emergency
Extension of Compliance Date 01/00/02
Final Action Phase I Amendments 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4418
Split from RIN 2050-AE01. The Agency will develop a Technical
Implementation Guidance on Phase I.
Sectors Affected: 2123 Non-Metallic Mineral Mining and Quarrying; 2211
Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution; 22132 Sewage
Treatment Facilities; 3241 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing;
3271 Clay Product and Refractory Manufacturing; 3231 Printing and
Related Support Activities; 3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing; 3252
Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial and Synthetic Fibers and
Filaments Manufacturing; 3253 Pesticide, Fertilizer and Other
Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 3254 Pharmaceutical and Medicine
Manufacturing; 3255 Paint, Coating, Adhesive, and Sealant
Manufacturing; 3259 Other Chemical Product Manufacturing; 3271 Clay
Product and Refractory Manufacturing; 3273 Cement and Concrete Product
Manufacturing; 3274 Lime, Gypsum and Gypsum Product Manufacturing; 3279
Other Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing; 3327 Machine Shops,
Turned Product, and Screw, Nut and Bolt Manufacturing; 3328 Coating,
Engraving, Heat Treating and Allied Activities; 3332 Industrial
Machinery Manufacturing; 3335 -; 3339 Other General Purpose Machinery
Manufacturing; 3341 Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing;
3342 Communications Equipment Manufacturing; 3343 Audio and Video
Equipment Manufacturing; 3344 Semiconductor and Other Electronic
Component Manufacturing; 3361 Motor Vehicle Manufacturing; 3362 Motor
Vehicle Body and Trailer Manufacturing; 3363 Motor Vehicle Parts
Manufacturing; 4227 Petroleum and Petroleum Products Wholesalers; 45431
Fuel Dealers; 5622 Waste Treatment and Disposal; 5629 Remediation and
Other Waste Management Services
Agency Contact: Rhonda Minnick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8771
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: minnick.rhonda@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE79
[[Page 62357]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3646. NESHAPS: STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR
HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS - PARALLEL PROPOSED RULE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6924 RCRA sec 3004; 42 USC 6925 RCRA sec 3005;
42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112; 42 USC 7414 CAA sec 114
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265;
40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 270
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is required to establish
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for
most hazardous waste combustors (HWCs) (i.e., incinerators, cement
kilns, boilers, and some types of recovery furnaces). In addition,
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA is
required to establish standards for all HWCs as necessary to ensure
protection of human health and the environment. Consequently, the
Agency established in the HWC Maximum Achievable Control Technology
(MACT) rule new emissions standards for cement kilns, lightweight
aggregate kilns, and incinerators under CAA authority on September 30,
1999 (64 FR 52828). Following promulgation, issues were raised by the
regulated community through informal comments and through litigation.
In response, the Agency published a direct final rule and a parallel
proposal on changes to and clarifications to certain provisions of the
final Phase I rule. The Agency partially withdrew a portion of the
direct final rule. (See RIN 2050-AE89.) Issues pertaining to the
withdrawal will be addressed during the development of a final rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Phase I Amendments 07/03/01 66 FR 35124
Interim Final Rule (See RIN
2050-AE79) 02/00/02
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4566
Split from RIN 2050-AE79.
Agency Contact: Rhonda Minnick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8771
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: minnick.rhonda@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE90
_______________________________________________________________________
3647. DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE; CODIFICATION OF MINERAL
PROCESSING VACATURE (CLASSIFICATION OF BATTERY RECYCLERS V. EPA) AND
DISCUSSION OF FUTURE PROPOSED RULEMAKING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6903(27) RCRA Section 1004(27)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.2(c)(3); 40 CFR 261.4(a)(17)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) a
material must first be a solid waste to be a hazardous waste. EPA's
framework for determining whether a material is a solid waste is based
on what the material is and how it is used. The 1998 Phase IV Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDR) rule purported to expand EPA's jurisdiction
over certain types of mineral processing hazardous secondary materials
stored on the land prior to being reclaimed in production processes.
The Association of Battery Recyclers v. U.S. EPA decision (208 F.3d
1047 (D.C. cir. 2000)) vacated a portion of the 1998 Phase IV LDR rule
at 40 CFR 261.2(c)(3) and vacated the Phase IV LDR rule insofar as it
provides for the use of the Toxicity Characteristic Leachating
Procedure (TCLP) to determine whether manufactured gas plant waste
exhibits the characteristic of toxicity. The intent of this rulemaking
is to codify changes directed in the vacatures and make conforming
changes to the regulations to ensure clarity. EPA will aslo discuss a
future proposed rulemaking to modify the rules governing hazardous
waste recycling (e.g., the definition of solid waste).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4615
Agency Contact: Ingrid Rosencrantz, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 605-0709
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: rosencrantz.ingrid@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE94
_______________________________________________________________________
3648. PROJECT XL -- ORTHO-MCNEIL PILOT PROJECT ALLOWING ON-SITE
TREATMENT OF LOW-LEVEL MIXED WASTES WITHOUT RCRA PERMIT
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922;
42 USC 6924(y); 42 USC 6938
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This site-specific rulemaking would allow Ortho-McNeil
Pharmaceutical to treat small volumes of low-level mixed wastes on-site
using a bench-scale catalytic oxidizing treatment unit. This treatment
effectively destroys the organic component of the wastestream, yielding
a residual that is only a low-level radioactive waste.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/24/01 66 FR 38395
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4439
Agency Contact: Mitch Kidwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1801, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2515
Fax: 202 260-3125
Email: kidwell.mitch@epa.gov
Nancy Birnbaum, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 1802, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2601
Fax: 202 401-6637
Email: birnbaum.nancy@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA14
[[Page 62358]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3649. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR THE IBM
SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING FACILITY IN HOPEWELL JUNCTION, NEW YORK
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922;
42 USC 6924(y); 42 USC 6938
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.4(a)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking provides a site-specific exclusion from the
regulatory definition of solid waste for certain wastewater treatment
sludges (otherwise designated as Hazardous Waste No. F006) when they
are used as ingredients in the production of cement. Without this
exclusion, the sludges being legitimately recycled as substitutes for
raw materials would remain subject to hazardous waste regulatory
requirements, including the need for a storage permit by the cement
manufacturer, which is a major disincentive to recycling the sludges in
this manner. This XL project tests the presumption that these sludges
can be safely recycled without regulatory oversight. Because this is a
site-specific rulemaking, there will be no impact on small businesses,
and there are no local tribal governments affected. The State
regulatory agency has been involved in the project and approves of the
rulemaking. The local governments and citizen groups have been involved
in the project development and no opposition has been raised.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/06/01 66 FR 30349
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4565
Agency Contact: Mitch Kidwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1801, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2515
Fax: 202 260-3125
Email: kidwell.mitch@epa.gov
David Fagan, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 5301W
Phone: 703 308-0603
Email: fagan.david@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA29
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3650. MANAGEMENT OF CEMENT KILN DUST (CKD)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a) RCRA sec 2002(a); 42 USC 6921(a) RCRA
sec 3001(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 256; 40 CFR 259; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Cement kiln dust (CKD) is a high volume material byproduct of
the cement manufacturing process. While it contains potentially
hazardous constituents such as lead, cadmium and chromium, it has been
exempted since November 1980 from hazardous waste regulation under RCRA
subtitle C by the Bevill Amendment. This amendment modified section
3001 of RCRA to exempt certain special wastes until further studies
could be completed and any applicable regulations were promulgated. In
December 1993, EPA submitted a Report to Congress with its findings on
the nature and management practices associated with CKD. This was
followed in January 1995 by an EPA regulatory determination published
in the Federal Register (60 FR 7366, 2/7/95), which concluded that
additional control of CKD is warranted. In the regulatory determination
EPA committed to develop regulations that would be tailored to protect
human health and the environment while limiting burden on the regulated
community. These tailored regulations would be developed under RCRA
subtitle C and, if necessary, the Clean Air Act. As part of its
regulatory development effort, EPA has initiated further studies and
has held informal discussions with stakeholders. A proposed rule was
issued (64 FR 45632, 8/20/99) which included a comprehensive set of
standards for the management of CKD. EPA is currently making an
assessment as to which regulatory approach it will like concerning CKD
waste management.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/20/99 64 FR 45631
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 3856
NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WASTE/1999/August/Day-20/f20546.htm
Sectors Affected: 32731 Cement Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Jana Englander, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8711
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: englander.jana@epa.gov
Steve Souders, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8431
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: souders.steve@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE34
_______________________________________________________________________
3651. FINAL DETERMINATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE TOXICITY
CHARACTERISTIC RULE TO PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED MEDIA AND DEBRIS FROM
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6921 RCRA sec 3001
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In the final hazardous waste Toxicity Characteristic (TC)
rule published in June 1990, EPA decided
[[Page 62359]]
to temporarily defer application of the TC rule to petroleum-
contaminated media and debris, such as soils and groundwater, that
result from underground storage tank (UST) corrective actions. This
rule is part of the Agency's commitment to make a final determination
regarding the UST temporary deferral. The temporary deferral was, in
part, based on the Agency's concern that without such a deferral, UST
cleanup procedures would be adversely affected, resulting in delays in
remedial action and increases in remediation costs. Since this action
is deregulatory, there are no adverse effects on small businesses, or
on State, local, or tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/12/93 58 FR 8504
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 3189
Agency Contact: Sammy Ng, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, 5401G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-9900
Fax: 202 260-9163
Email: ng.sammy@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AD69
_______________________________________________________________________
3652. LISTING DETERMINATION OF WASTES GENERATED DURING THE MANUFACTURE
OF AZO, ANTHRAQUINONE, AND TRIARYLMETHANE DYES AND PIGMENTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6921 RCRA sec 3001; 42 USC 9602 Superfund
(CERCLA) sec 102
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR
302
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, See Additional Information Section.
Final, Judicial, See Additional Information Section.
Abstract: This action addresses the potential human health and
environmental risks posed by wastes from the manufacture of dyes and
pigments, and determines whether these wastes should be listed as
hazardous wastes under RCRA to control any potentially unacceptable
risks. If listed under RCRA, these wastes would also be added to the
CERCLA list of hazardous substances. This action will be implemented by
EPA and States authorized under RCRA. Impacts on local governments are
not expected, and there may be some small business impacts. EPA
proposed listing decisions for most wastes in 1994 (Dyes-I), and
deferred decisions on several others. Two deferred waste streams
(filter aids and triarylmethane sludges) are subject to separate
deadlines for proposed and final action (Dyes II rulemaking). The Dyes
II NPRM was published on July 23, 1999. The rules proposed in 1994 and
1999 were incomplete because they did not contain information claimed
to be confidential by industry. Therefore, a NODA for each proposal
will be necessary, when EPA is able to release an adequate record. The
deadlines are based on recent settlement discussions with plaintiffs in
EDF v. Browner, Civil Action No. 89-0598 D.D.C.
As part of the listing of dyes and pigments effort, EPA will also
develop land disposal restrictions for these dyes and pigments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Dyes I 12/22/94 59 FR 66072
NPRM Dyes II (deferred wastes) 07/23/99 64 FR 40192
NPRM Dyes I Land Disposal
Restrictions To Be Determined
NoDA Dyes I Notice of Data
Availability. See Additional
Information. To Be Determined
NoDA Dyes II Notice of Data
Availability. See Additional
Information. To Be Determined
Final Action Dyes I. See
Additional Information. To Be Determined
Final Action Dyes II (Deferred
Wastes). See Additional
Information. To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3066
Judicial Deadlines: Dyes II (deferred wastes) NPRM: met deadline of 6/
30/1999. Dyes I & II NODAs due by 67 days after the injunction is
lifted from Magruder case. NPRM for LDRs due 3 months after NODAs are
signed. Dyes I and II final rules due 13 months after NODAs are signed.
Sectors Affected: 325132 Organic Dye and Pigment Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Sue Slotnick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8462
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: slotnick.sue@epa.gov
Wanda LeBleu, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0438
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: lebleu.wanda@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AD80
_______________________________________________________________________
3653. RCRA SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL TEST CRITERIA (REVISION)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a) RCRA sec 2002(a); 42 USC 6924 RCRA sec
3004; 42 USC 6925 RCRA sec 3005; 42 USC 6926 RCRA sec 3006
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 280; 40 CFR 761
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The revised financial responsibility test is intended to
improve the current test in predicting which firms will enter
bankruptcy and not be able to cover their financial obligations for
liability and closure costs of hazardous waste treatment, storage and
disposal facilities. A bankrupt firm may be unable to afford the proper
closure of a facility which would require the government to incur
response costs at the facility. The rule would also qualify owners and
operators of RCRA Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities which
must currently use more expensive ways, such as surety bonds or letters
of credit, of demonstrating financial assurance, to use the less
expensive corporate financial responsibility test for more of their
obligations. The combined savings from screening out riskier firms and
making the test more available to viable firms would be approximately
$19 million annually in public and private costs. These regulatory
amendments
[[Page 62360]]
would have no effect on local or tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/01/91 56 FR 30201
NPRM 10/12/94 59 FR 51523
Notice of Data Availability 06/00/02
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 2647
Sectors Affected: 323110 Commercial Lithographic Printing; 323114 Quick
Printing; 325131 Inorganic Dye and Pigment Manufacturing; 325188 All
Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing; 325998 All Other
Miscellaneous Chemical Product Manufacturing; 331311 Alumina Refining;
325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing; 32551 Paint and
Coating Manufacturing; 32511 Petrochemical Manufacturing; 32512
Industrial Gas Manufacturing; 325188 All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical
Manufacturing; 325193 Ethyl Alcohol Manufacturing; 325199 All Other
Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing; 325998 All Other Miscellaneous
Chemical Product Manufacturing; 311942 Spice and Extract Manufacturing;
32411 Petroleum Refineries; 332813 Electroplating, Plating, Polishing,
Anodizing and Coloring; 33271 Machine Shops; 33299 All Other Fabricated
Metal Product Manufacturing; 333319 Other Commercial and Service
Industry Machinery Manufacturing; 333999 All Other General Purpose
Machinery Manufacturing; 336399 All Other Motor Vehicle Parts
Manufacturing; 334 Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing; 336
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 48422 Specialized Freight
(except Used Goods) Trucking, Local; 56211 Waste Collection; 22111
Electric Power Generation; 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power
Generation; 22132 Sewage Treatment Facilities; 56292 Materials Recovery
Facilities; 42271 Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals; 45431 Fuel
Dealers; 4411 Automobile Dealers; 4471 Gasoline Stations; 811111
General Automotive Repair
Agency Contact: Dale Ruhter, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5303W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8192
Fax: 703 308-8609
Email: ruhter.dale@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AC71
_______________________________________________________________________
3654. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST REGULATION
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922 RCRA sec 3002; 42 USC 6923 RCRA sec 3003;
42 USC 6924 RCRA sec 3004; 42 USC 6926 RCRA sec 3006; PL 105-277, Title
17 Government Paper Elimination Act
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 263; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR
265; 40 CFR 271
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest (Form 8700-22) is a
multi-copy form used to identify the quantity, composition, origin,
routing, and destination of hazardous waste during its transportation.
The manifest system's reliance on paper results in significant
paperwork and cost burden to waste handlers and States who choose to
collect manifest information. The Agency intends to pursue an optional
approach to redesign the manifest system so that it utilizes automated
technologies to increase access to manifest-related information, and to
facilitate the manifest process, including the form's preparation,
transmission, and recordkeeping, thereby lessening the total burden on
waste handlers and States that choose to collect manifests. In
addition, the Agency intends to standardize further the manifest form
itself, by eliminating several optional data fields.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/22/01 66 FR 28239
Final Action - Modification of
the Hazardous Waste Manifest
System 04/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 3147
Sectors Affected: 5622 Waste Treatment and Disposal; 2111 Oil and Gas
Extraction; 2122 Metal Ore Mining; 2211 Electric Power Generation,
Transmission and Distribution; 3221 Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills;
323 Printing and Related Support Activities; 325 Chemical
Manufacturing; 326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing; 331
Primary Metal Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing; 482 Rail Transportation; 483 Water Transportation; 484
Truck Transportation; 5621 Waste Collection
Agency Contact: Rich Lashier, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8796
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: lashier.rich@epamail.epa.gov
Bryan Groce, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8750
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: groce.bryan@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE21
_______________________________________________________________________
3655. LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS; TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR SPENT
POTLINERS FROM PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION (K088) AND REGULATORY
CLASSIFICATION OF K088 VITRIFICATION UNITS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6924
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 271
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On July 20, 2000, EPA proposed revised treatment standards
for K088 wastes. Specifically, the Agency proposed to lower the cyanide
treatment standard and reinstate a treatment standard for fluoride
nonwastewaters based on a deionized water leach test. Comments to the
proposed rule were significant and suggest that there are significant
treatment issues yet to be resolved for K088 waste. The Agency needs to
further assess the treatment universe for K088 and is considered
extending the possible date of a final rule or to investigate other
strategies both regulatory and non-regulatory to
[[Page 62361]]
facilitate recycling of spent aluminum potliners.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/12/00 65 FR 42937
Final Action 10/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4233
Sectors Affected: 3334 Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning and
Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Elaine Eby, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8449
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: eby.elaine@epa.gov
Rick Brandes, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8871
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: brandes.william@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE65
_______________________________________________________________________
3656. STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COAL COMBUSTION WASTES GENERATED
BY COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCERS
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907(a)(3); 42 USC 6944(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action is for the development of proposed RCRA subtitle
D regulations for the management of coal combustion wastes in landfills
and surface impoundments that are generated by producers of electric
power, including electric utilities and independent power producers. On
April 25, 2000 EPA issued a regulatory determination for fossil fuel
combustion wastes (65 FR 32214, May 22, 2000). The purpose of the
determination was to decide whether certain wastes from the combustion
of fossil fuels (including coal, oil and natural gas) should remain
exempt from subtitle C (management as hazardous waste) of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for the coal, oil and natural gas
combustion wastes that were addressed. The Agency's decision was to
retain the exemption from hazardous waste management for all of the
fossil fuel combustion wastes. However, the Agency also determined and
announced that waste management regulations under RCRA subtitle D
(management as non-hazardous wastes) are appropriate for certain coal
combustion wastes that are disposed in landfills and surface
impoundments.
The utility industry has made significant improvements in its waste
management practices over recent years, and most state regulatory
programs are similarly improving. Nevertheless, public comments and
other analyses have convinced the Agency that coal combustion wastes
could pose risks to human health and the environment if they are not
properly managed. There is sufficient evidence that adequate controls
may not be in place. For example, while most states can now require
newer waste management units to include liners and groundwater
monitoring, 62 percent of existing utility surface impoundments do not
have groundwater monitoring. In the Agency's view, this justifies the
development of national regulations. We note, however, that some waste
management units may not warrant liners and/or groundwater monitoring,
depending on site-specific characteristics. The Agency is initiating
this action to develop and issue appropriate waste management
regulations under subtitle D of RCRA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4470
This rule may also impact federal, state, local or tribal governments
that own coal-burning commercial electric power generating facilities.
Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation
Agency Contact: Dennis Ruddy, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8430
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: ruddy.dennis@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE81
_______________________________________________________________________
3657. STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COAL COMBUSTION WASTES - NON-POWER
PRODUCERS AND MINEFILLING
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907(a)(3); 42 USC 6944
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is developing proposed regulations for the management of
coal combustion wastes that are generated by non-electric utility coal
burners and managed in landfills and surface impoundments, and for the
practice of minefilling of coal combustion wastes. On April 25, 2000
EPA issued a regulatory determination for fossil fuel combustion wastes
(65 FR 32214, May 22, 2000) to announce its decision that certain
wastes from the combustion of fossil fuels (including coal, oil and
natural gas) should remain exempt from subtitle C (management as
hazardous waste) of RCRA. This regulatory determination also announced
that regulations under RCRA subtitle D (management as non-hazardous
wastes) are appropriate for management of certain coal combustion
wastes that are disposed in landfills and surface impoundments. In
addition, EPA stated its plan to consult with the U.S. Department of
the Interior on appropriate measures under the Surface Mining Control
and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) or RCRA or some combination of both, to
address the disposal of coal combustion wastes when used for
minefilling in surface or underground mines.
[[Page 62362]]
Although industry has made significant improvements in waste management
practices over recent years, and most state regulatory programs are
similarly improving, public comments and other analyses have convinced
the Agency that coal combustion wastes could pose risks to human health
and the environment, if they are not properly managed. There is
sufficient evidence that adequate controls may not be in place. For
example, while most States can now require newer waste management units
to include liners and groundwater monitoring, less than about 50
percent of existing non-utility landfills are lined (these statistics
exclude municipal solid waste landfills which are not the subject of
this action). EPA acknowledges that some waste management units may not
warrant liners and/or groundwater monitoring, depending on site-
specific characteristics. The Agency also decided that the practice of
minefilling coal combustion wastes could present a danger to human
health and the environment under certain circumstances. Since there are
few States that currently operate comprehensive programs that
specifically address the unique circumstances of minefilling, the
Agency believes national regulations under RCRA subtitle D and/or SMCRA
may be appropriate.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4469
This rule may also impact Federal, State, local or tribal governments
that own/operate coal-burning facilities (excluding facilities that
primarily generate electric power for sale) or coal mines that accept
coal combustion wastes.
Sectors Affected: 311 Food Manufacturing; 313 Textile Mills; 337
Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing; 2121 Coal Mining; 322
Paper Manufacturing; 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 331 Primary Metal
Manufacturing; 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 62 Health
Care and Social Assistance; 22112 Electric Power Transmission, Control
and Distribution
Agency Contact: Dennis Ruddy, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8430
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: ruddy.dennis@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE83
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3658. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: SLAG RESIDUES DERIVED FROM HIGH
TEMPERATURE METALS RECOVERY (HTMR) TREATMENT OF KO61, KO62 AND F0006
WASTES
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 266
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Work 09/11/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Federalism: Undetermined
Agency Contact: Narendra Chaudhari
Phone: 703 308-0454
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: chaudhari.narendra@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE15
_______________________________________________________________________
3659. HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION; RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT
STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 279
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Work 09/11/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Federalism: Undetermined
Agency Contact: Mike Svizzero
Phone: 703 308-0046
Fax: 703 308-8617
Email: svizzero.michael@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE28
_______________________________________________________________________
3660. MERCURY-CONTAINING AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERY MANAGEMENT ACT;
CODIFICATION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 273
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Work 09/11/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Federalism: Undetermined
Agency Contact: Bryan Groce
Phone: 703 308-8750
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: groce.bryan@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE39
[[Page 62363]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3661. STORAGE, TREATMENT, TRANSPORTATION, AND DISPOSAL OF MIXED WASTES;
FINAL RULE
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.4; 40 CFR 262.34; 40 CFR 266
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 05/16/01 66 FR 27217
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Agency Contact: Nancy Hunt
Phone: 703 308-8762
Fax: 703 308-8609
Email: hunt.nancy@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE45
_______________________________________________________________________
3662. RECYCLED USED OIL CONTAINING PCBS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 279
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Removal (of 3 Amendments) 07/14/98 63 FR 37780
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Agency Contact: Mike Svizzero
Phone: 703 308-0046
Fax: 703 308-8617
Email: svizzero.michael@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE47
_______________________________________________________________________
3663. RCRA APPENDIX VIII STREAMLINING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Work 09/11/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: Undetermined
Agency Contact: Dr. Monica A. Barron
Phone: 703 308-0483
Fax: 703 308-0509
Email: barron.monica@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE55
_______________________________________________________________________
3664. CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS (SWMUS) AT
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 270
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Work 09/11/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: Undetermined
Agency Contact: Barbara Foster
Phone: 703 308-7057
Fax: 703 308-8638
Email: foster.barbara@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AB80
_______________________________________________________________________
3665. HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION RULE (HWIR): IDENTIFICATION AND
LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 05/16/01 66 FR 27266
Direct Final Rule 10/03/01 66 FR 50332
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Agency Contact: Tracy Atagi
Phone: 703 308-8672
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: atagi.tracy@epa.gov
Adam Klinger
Phone: 703 308-3267
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: klinger.adam@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE07
_______________________________________________________________________
3666. REINVENTING THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 268
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Work 09/11/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: Undetermined
Agency Contact: Josh Lewis
Phone: 703 308-7877
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: lewis.josh@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE53
_______________________________________________________________________
3667. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC RULE FOR SPECIFIC
LEAD-BASED PAINT DEBRIS
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - RCRA Temporary
Suspension 10/17/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Agency Contact: Rajani Joglekar
Phone: 703 308-8806
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: joglekar.rajani@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE68
_______________________________________________________________________
3668. RCRA CONTROLS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - Agency Plans No
Further Work 09/11/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: Undetermined
Agency Contact: Marie Boucher
Phone: 703 308-8754
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: boucher.marie@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE82
[[Page 62364]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3669. CRITERIA FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND
PRACTICES AND CRITERIA FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS: DISPOSAL OF
RESIDENTIAL LEAD-BASED PAINT WASTE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257; 40 CFR 258
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 10/23/01 66 FR 53535
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Federalism: Undetermined
Agency Contact: Susan Nogas
Phone: 703 308-7251
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: nogas.sue@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE86
_______________________________________________________________________
3670. NESHAPS: STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR
HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6924 RCRA sec 3004; 42 USC 6925 RCRA sec 3005;
42 USC 7412 CAA sec 112; 42 USC 7414 CAA sec 114
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265;
40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 270
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is required to establish
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for
most hazardous waste combustors (HWCs) (i.e., incinerators, cement
kilns, boilers, and some types of recovery furnaces). In addition,
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA is
required to establish standards for all HWCs as necessary to ensure
protection of human health and the environment. Consequently, the
Agency established in the HWC Maximum Achievable Control Technology
(MACT) rule new emissions standards for cement kilns, lightweight
aggregate kilns, and incinerators under CAA authority on September 30,
1999 (64 FR 52828). Following promulgation, issues were raised by the
regulated community through informal comments and through litigation.
In response, this rule will promulgate changes to and clarifications to
certain provisions of the final Phase I rule. The Agency issued a
notice to withdraw a portion of the direct final rule, based on
comments received.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Court-Ordered Vacature 05/14/01 66 FR 24270
Direct Final Rule - Phase I
Amendments 07/03/01 66 FR 35087
Notice - Partial Withdrawal of
Direct Final Rule 10/15/01 66 FR 52361
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4552
Split from RIN 2050-AE79.
Agency Contact: Rhonda Minnick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8771
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: minnick.rhonda@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE89
_______________________________________________________________________
3671. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR THE US FILTER RECOVERY
SERVICES, ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA, AND APPROVED GENERATORS AND TRANSPORTERS
OF USFRS XL WASTE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260 to 265; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 270; 40 CFR 273; 40
CFR 279
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 05/22/01 66 FR 28066
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Agency Contact: Sandra Panetta
Phone: 202 260-6632
Fax: 202 260-3125
Email: panetta.sandra@epa.gov
Robert Egan
Phone: 312 886-6212
Fax: 312 353-4788
Email: robert egan@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA15
_______________________________________________________________________
3672. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR YOLO COUNTY LANDFILL,
DAVIS, YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/09/01 66 FR 23652
Final Action 08/13/01 66 FR 42441
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Agency Contact: Sherri L. Walker
Phone: 202 260-4295
Fax: 202 260-3125
Email: walker.sherri@epa.gov
Dwight Hlustick
Phone: 703 308-8647
Email: hlustick.dwight@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA18
_______________________________________________________________________
3673. PROJECT XL NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE FOR AUTOLIV INC. SITE-SPECIFIC
RULEMAKING
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 05/09/01 66 FR 23617
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Ted Cochin
Phone: 202 260-0880
Fax: 202 401-6637
Email: cochin.ted@epa.gov
Mary Byrne
Phone: 303 312-6491
Email: byrne.mary@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA19
[[Page 62365]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Oil Pollution Act (OPA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3674. OIL POLLUTION PREVENTION REGULATION: REVISIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321 CWA sec 311(j)(l)(C)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 112
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Following a major inland oil spill with substantial
environmental impacts (i.e., Ashland Oil in Floreffe, PA, in January
1988), an interagency task force recommended steps to improve EPA's oil
spill prevention program (40 CFR part 112). This program requires oil
storage facilities to prevent and contain discharges that could reach
waters of the United States. On October 22, 1991, the Agency proposed
revisions to implement some of the task force recommendations and on
February 17, 1993, the Agency proposed further clarifications and
technical changes to the spill prevention regulations. On December 2,
1997, EPA supplemented the 1991 and 1993 proposed revisions with a
proposal to reduce burdens associated with the oil spill prevention
program by reducing the recordkeeping provisions or exempting some
facilities from some recordkeeping requirements. This rule will take
final action on the 1991, 1993, and 1997 proposals.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/22/91 56 FR 54612
NPRM 02/17/93 58 FR 8824
Supplemental NPRM 12/02/97 62 FR 63812
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2634
Agency Contact: Hugo Fleischman, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5203G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8769
Fax: 703 603-9116
Email: fleischman.hugo@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AC62
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
_______________________________________________________________________
3675. REPORTABLE QUANTITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR CARBAMATES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11004; 42 USC 9602(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302; 40 CFR 355
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has listed carbamate waste streams as hazardous wastes
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRA listed
wastes, by statute, automatically become hazardous substances under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) and are assigned a one-pound statutory reportable quantity
(RQ) unless EPA adjusts them. These substances also become subject to
reporting requirements under the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) with a one-pound threshold. EPA, in this
action, will propose RQ adjustments for the carbamates. Most RQ
adjustments are expected to be greater than one pound. Raising the RQs
for these substances would decrease the burden on (1) the regulated
community for complying with the reporting requirements under CERCLA
and EPCRA; (2) Federal, State, and local authorities for program
implementation; and (3) Federal, State, or local authorities, if they
release hazardous substances at the RQ level or greater.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3423
Agency Contact: Frank Avvisato, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8949
Fax: 703 603-9100
Email: avvisato.frank@epa.gov
Lynn Beasley, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-9086
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: beasley.lynn@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE12
_______________________________________________________________________
3676. NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST FOR UNCONTROLLED HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES:
PROPOSED AND FINAL RULES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9605 Superfund (CERCLA) sec 105
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300.425
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will revise the sites included on the National
Priorities List (NPL) of uncontrolled waste sites in the National
Contingency Plan (NCP). CERCLA requires that the Agency revise the NPL
at least annually. Periodic revisions will allow EPA to include sites
on the NPL with known or threatened hazardous substance releases and to
delete sites that have been cleaned up.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 24 03/06/98 63 FR 11340
Final Action 20 03/06/98 63 FR 11332
NPRM 25 07/28/98 63 FR 40247
Final Action 21 07/28/98 63 FR 40182
Final Action (Tex-Tin Corp) 09/18/98 63 FR 49855
NPRM 26 09/29/98 63 FR 51882
Final Action 22 09/29/98 63 FR 51848
NPRM 27 01/19/99 64 FR 2950
Final Action 23 01/19/99 64 FR 2942
NPRM (Midnight Mine) 02/16/99 64 FR 7564
NPRM 28 04/23/99 64 FR 19968
NPRM (Almeda) 05/10/99 64 FR 24990
Final Action 24 05/10/99 64 FR 24949
NPRM 29 07/22/99 64 FR 39886
Final Action 25 07/22/99 64 FR 39878
NPRM 30 10/22/99 64 FR 56992
Final Action 10/22/99 64 FR 56966
NPRM 31 02/04/00 65 FR 5468
Final Action 26 02/04/00 65 FR 5435
NPRM 32 05/11/00 65 FR 30489
Final Action 28 05/11/00 65 FR 30482
NPRM 33 07/27/00 65 FR 46131
Final Action 29 07/27/00 65 FR 46096
[[Page 62366]]
NPRM Alabama/Malone 08/24/00 65 FR 51567
NPRM 34 12/01/00 65 FR 75215
Final Action 30 12/01/00 65 FR 75179
NPRM 35 01/11/01 66 FR 2380
NPRM 36 06/14/01 66 FR 32287
Final Action 31 06/14/01 66 FR 32235
NPRM 37 09/13/01 66 FR 47612
Final Action 32 09/13/01 66 FR 47583
NPRM Site No. Undetermined 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3439
Agency Contact: Yolanda Singer, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8835
Fax: 703 603-9100
Email: singer.yolanda@epa.gov
Terry Keidan, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8852
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: keidan.terry@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AD75
_______________________________________________________________________
3677. REVISE 40 CFR PART 35 SUBPART O: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS AND
SUPERFUND STATE CONTRACTS FOR SUPERFUND RESPONSE ACTIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 to 9675
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 35 subpart O
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: 40 CFR part 35 subpart O is the Superfund Administrative
Regulation that governs awarding of Superfund cooperative agreements
(CAs) to States, Indian tribes, and territories of the United States.
Subpart O covers State-lead, site-specific cooperative agreements for
non-time-critical removal, preremedial, remedial, and enforcement
actions, and site-specific management assistance for federal-lead
projects. Also covered by subpart O are non-site-specific Core Program
and Voluntary Cleanup Program State infrastructure development, as well
as Brownfields pilots, and Brownfields assessments. The requirements
for Superfund State contracts, financial administration, property,
procurement, reporting, recordkeeping, and closeout are provided in
subpart O.
Subpart O was promulgated 6/5/1990, and became effective on 7/5/1990.
Many changes in the Superfund program have occurred over the past
almost ten years and these need to be reflected in subpart O. The six
categories of CAs presently used in subpart O need greater flexibility
to accommodate the new types of CAs that have developed. For example,
the number of Block Funding Reform pilots, begun in 1997, to
consolidate several of the cooperative agreements offered in subpart O,
has grown to about 16 for fiscal year 2000, and have generated at least
60 approved deviation requests from subpart O and 40 CFR part 31. These
pilot projects offer considerable administrative relief to States,
tribes, and EPA by reducing reporting requirements, broadening scope
changes without amendment, increasing the ability to move monies within
and among CAs, and relaxing application requirements regarding site-
specific identification of cooperative agreement funds to certain
activities, while maintaining site-specific drawdown requirements
needed for cost recovery and Superfund accounting. Subpart O also needs
to be conformed with part 31 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements).
EPA expects to institutionalize the combining of CA types, create more
flexible reporting requirements, permit greater scope changes without
amendment, provide more flexible money movement within and among CAs,
and other policy advances in State/tribal/EPA interaction.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Procurement: This is a procurement-related action for which there is no
statutory requirement. There is no paperwork burden associated with
this action.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4177
Agency Contact: Kirby Biggs, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8506
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: biggs.kirby@epa.gov
Stephen Caldwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8833
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: caldwell.stephen@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE62
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
_______________________________________________________________________
3678. FINAL RULE TO CORRECT TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS AND REMOVE
OBSOLETE LANGUAGE IN 40 CFR PART 302
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9602 to 9604; 33 USC 1231; 33 USC 1261
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has reviewed the portions of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) related to the release reporting program under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA). Within these regulations, which appear in 40 CFR part 302,
EPA has identified several categories of errors, including: (1)
typographical errors in the table of CERCLA hazardous substances (Table
302.4 in 40 CFR 302.4); (2) definitions made legally obsolete because
of
[[Page 62367]]
changes in CERCLA's statutory provisions; and (3) redundant or
unnecessary information (particularly in the ``Regulatory synonyms,''
``Statutory RQ,'' and ``Final RQ Category'' columns of Table 302.4)
that could be removed from the CFR to reduce potential confusion.
Correcting the typographical errors, updating definitions, and removing
redundant information in 40 CFR part 302 will not affect the scope of
what is regulated or how it is regulated. For this reason, EPA is
developing a final rule to make these minor corrections.
EPA does not anticipate any substantial impact on small businesses or
State/tribal/local governments because the final rule will not
introduce any new regulations or impose new burdens. The corrections
included in this rulemaking will serve to reduce confusion among the
regulated community and government authorities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3929
Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-9086
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: beasley.lynn@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE88
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
_______________________________________________________________________
3679. REPORTING EXEMPTIONS FOR FEDERALLY PERMITTED RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321; 33 USC 1361; 42 USC 9602; 42 USC 11004
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 117; 40 CFR 302; 40 CFR 355
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will clarify the definition of federally
permitted release under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Federally permitted releases
of hazardous substances are exempt from CERCLA reporting and liability,
and from reporting under section 304 of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/19/88 53 FR 27268
Supplemental Notice 07/11/89 54 FR 29306
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 2394
Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-9086
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: beasley.lynn@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AB82
_______________________________________________________________________
3680. STREAMLINING THE PREAUTHORIZATION MIXED FUNDING FOR APPLICATION
AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CLAIMS AGAINST SUPERFUND
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 307
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Current regulations at 40 CFR part 307 provide for the
preauthorization of claims against the Superfund in instances where the
Agency makes a determination that mixed funding is appropriate. This
process has been labeled by many stakeholders as overly burdensome. The
Agency has reviewed the current process in order to identify areas in
which burdens may be lessened and requirements may be streamlined. As a
result, the Agency is considering a proposal to amend the current
regulation to: streamline the application process by eliminating
duplicative information requirements; minimize the requirements related
to management, oversight, and reporting of the cleanup, by removing the
requirement to be guided by the Federal Acquisition Requirements, and
replacing the requirement of maximum free and open competition with a
bright-line standard; allow claimants to provide independent
certification of claims and supporting documentation; streamline the
actual payment process by taking advantage of the electronic funds
transfer process; ensure that cost recovery concerns are addressed by
requiring claimants, within a settlement document, to reimburse the
Fund for costs not recovered (only in the event cost recovery is
initiated), due to claimants' failure to provide adequate documentary
support or upon a determination that response costs expended (and
claimed) were not reasonable or not incurred consistent with the
National Contingency Plan and ensure proper accounting by requiring
offsets for funds owed to the Agency by claimants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 3885
Agency Contact: Phyllis Anderson, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5201G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8971
Fax: 703 603-9146
Email: anderson.phyllis@epa.gov
Lynn Beasley, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-9086
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: beasley.lynn@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE38
[[Page 62368]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3681. CRITERIA FOR THE DESIGNATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES UNDER CERCLA
SECTION 102(A)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9602
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302.4
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will address the development of evaluation
criteria for the designation of substances as hazardous under CERCLA.
It is necessary to develop evaluation criteria because the Agency has
the authority under CERCLA 102(a) to designate substances as hazardous;
however, the Agency does not have criteria to do so. To date the only
substances designated as CERCLA hazardous substances are as a result of
their appearance on other Acts' lists defined under CERCLA 101(14).
Using CERCLA designation criteria the Agency may establish CERCLA
hazardous substances independently from other Acts, in the interest of
public health and the environment.
The purpose of this action is to have well thought-out criteria for
designating hazardous substances that may be applied to individual
substances for evaluation and decision as to whether or not the
substance should be appropriately designated a CERCLA 102(a) hazardous
substance. The Agency already has the authority to designate substances
as hazardous; in this action, criteria will be developed to implement
that authority.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4201
Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-9086
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: beasley.lynn@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE63
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Clean Water Act (CWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3682. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRY
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 137 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2040-AD42
_______________________________________________________________________
3683. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE AQUATIC ANIMAL
PRODUCTION INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: CWA sec 301; CWA sec 304; CWA sec 306; CWA sec 307;
CWA sec 308; CWA sec 318; CWA sec 402; CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 451
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, June 30, 2002.
Final, Judicial, June 30, 2004.
Abstract: EPA is focusing new efforts to help reduce nutrient loadings
from commercial agricultural and industrial operations nationwide.
Currently, there are no Federal technology-based standards for aquatic
animal production facilities, which are part of the aquaculture
industry. This action is a new effort to develop pollutant controls in
the form of nationally applicable discharge standards for commercial
and public aquaculture operations.
In assessments of surface water quality, States most frequently cite
siltation, nutrients, and pathogens as the major cause of water quality
impairment. With the growth of the aquaculture industry, and
inconsistent state regulatory oversight, EPA will examine available
technologies for the control of pollutants, primarily nutrients. This
action was formerly titled Aquaculture.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/02
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4406
Sectors Affected: 112519 Other Animal Aquaculture; 112512 Shellfish
Farming; 112511 Finfish Farming and Fish Hatcheries
Agency Contact: Marta E. Jordan, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0817
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: jordan.marta@epa.gov
Kristen Strellec, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-6036
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: strellec.kristen@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD55
_______________________________________________________________________
3684. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE MEAT PRODUCTS POINT
SOURCE CATEGORY (REVISIONS)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1316; 33 USC 1317; 33
USC 1318; 33 USC 1361
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 432 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, December 31, 2001.
Final, Judicial, December 31, 2003.
Abstract: The Agency is revising effluent limitations guidelines and
standards for the Meat Products Point Source Category. The current
regulations, at 40 CFR 432, are more than 20 years old and are limited
to a few conventional pollutants. Recent concerns about nutrient
discharges from these facilities might be resolved by additional
effluent limitations. In particular, the current regulations do not
address ammonia nitrogen for red meat slaughterhouses/packinghouses
(subparts A to D). Nutrients are a
[[Page 62369]]
significant remaining water quality problem for impaired streams.
Revisions to the current regulations will also include effluent
limitations for poultry processing, which is not currently covered by
any effluent guideline.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/01
Final Action 12/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State, Local, Tribal, Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4407
Sectors Affected: 311611 Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering; 311612
Meat Processed from Carcasses; 311613 Rendering and Meat By-product
Processing; 311615 Poultry Processing
Agency Contact: Samantha Lewis, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7149
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: lewis.samantha@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD56
_______________________________________________________________________
3685. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ALABAMA--PHASE II
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1313 CWA 303
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, January 15, 2002, Consent decree
specifies that EPA will sign proposed Federal replacement standards by
1/15/02 unless EPA approves state use designations.
Final, Statutory, 90 Days after Proposal.
Abstract: Under the CWA, States have primary authority in developing
water quality standards for waters within their jurisdiction. EPA
maintains oversight authority in that States must submit their water
quality standards to EPA for review and approval or disapproval. If a
State's water quality standards are not consistent with the
requirements of the CWA and its supporting regulations, and are
subsequently disapproved by EPA, the State must revise the disapproved
water quality standards. If the State does not revise the disapproved
water quality standards, the CWA requires the EPA Administrator to
promulgate Federal water quality standards to supersede those
disapproved provisions in the states' water quality standards. EPA is
developing a proposed rule to determine the appropriate use
designations for seven waterbodies in Alabama that EPA disapproved in
1986 and 1991.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/02
Final Action 06/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4264
Agency Contact: Fritz Wagener, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
Region04, Atlanta, GA 30303
Phone: 404 562-9267
Cara Lalley, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4305, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0314
Fax: 202 260-9830
Email: lalley.cara@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD35
_______________________________________________________________________
3686. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MERCURY UNDER THE CLEAN WATER
ACT (METHOD 245.7)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq; 33 USC 1314(h); 33 USC 1361(a); PL
92-500 76 Stat. 816; PL 95-217 91 Stat. 1567; PL 100-4 100 Stat. 7
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136.3(IB)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would propose to amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR part 136 to approve a new analytical test procedure (method) for
the determination of mercury in the wastewater program as authorized
under the Clean Water Act (CWA). This new test procedure is capable of
measuring mercury at low parts-per-trillion (ppt; ng/L) concentrations
and would be an alternative to the recently promulgated EPA Method
1631, which also determines mercury at low ppt concentrations. EPA
Method 245.7 uses similar technology to EPA Method 1631 (cold vapor
atomic fluorescence spectrometry), but it does not require the use of a
gold trap. Laboratories claim that EPA Method 245.7 is a less
burdensome and more cost-effective method than EPA Method 1631.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/02
Final Action 06/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4377
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD52
_______________________________________________________________________
3687. MINIMIZING ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM COOLING WATER INTAKE
STRUCTURES AT EXISTING FACILITIES UNDER SECTION 316(B) OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT, PHASE 2
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 138 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2040-AD62
_______________________________________________________________________
3688. NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION
SYSTEMS, MUNICIPAL SATELLITE COLLECTION SYSTEMS, AND SANITARY SEWER
OVERFLOWS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 136 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2040-AD02
[[Page 62370]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3689. RECOGNITION AWARDS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1361(a) and (e); CWA 501(a) and (e)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 105 (New)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is establishing a
framework for the annual Clean Water Act (CWA) Recognition Awards known
as the National Wastewater Management Excellence Awards Program.
Section 501(e) of the CWA authorized the Administrator, on behalf of
the U.S. Government, to recognize outstanding technological
achievements or innovative processes, methods or devices in waste
treatment and pollution abatement programs. The rule would establish
regulations under which the recognition may be applied for and granted.
The existing awards program recognizes innovative and outstanding
achievements, processes, methods or devices in: Operations and
Maintenance (O&M) of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW); Biosolids
Management (Biosolids); POTW Pretreatment Programs; Municipal and
Industrial Storm Water (SW) Management; and Combined Sewer Overflows
(CSO) Controls. These wastewater management programs can generally be
characterized as waste treatment and/or pollution abatement programs.
EPA may later establish, discontinue, combine or rename categories by
notice published in the Federal Register. Though the Agency has
conducted an awards program for many years, this rulemaking action
clearly acknowledges the basis for the program. EPA is formalizing the
CWA Recognition Awards program using a direct final rulemaking because
the Agency does not expect adverse comments. Unless the Agency receives
comments requiring a response during the public comment period
associated with an identical companion proposed rule published
elsewhere in the Federal Register on the same day, the formalized
program would become effective without further notice.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM - Companion of Direct Final
Rule 01/00/02
Direct Final Rule 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4332
Note: This rule was formerly known as National Wastewater Management
Excellence Awards Program.
Sectors Affected: 2213 Water, Sewage and Other Systems; 5622 Waste
Treatment and Disposal
Agency Contact: Maria Campbell, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4204M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0628
Fax: 202 501-2396
Email: campbell.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD44
_______________________________________________________________________
3690. OCEAN DISCHARGES CRITERIA REVISIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1343 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 125.121(a); 40 CFR 125.121(e); 40 CFR 125.122; 40
CFR 125.123; 40 CFR 125.124
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing to modify the existing regulations
implementing the ocean protection provisions of section 403 of the
Clean Water Act. A key element of the proposed rule would provide for
establishment of baseline water quality standards for ocean waters
beyond three miles offshore. These waters, designated ``Healthy Ocean
Waters,'' would be protected by both a narrative statement of desired
quality and pollutant-specific numeric criteria. The proposed rule also
would strengthen the requirements for a permit to discharge to any
ocean waters, and would create a process for establishing Special Ocean
Sites (SOSs), which are areas within ocean waters that are of
outstanding value, where new and significantly expanded discharges
would be prohibited. The proposed rule will enhance the protection of
the ocean environment and meet the goals of the Executive order on
Marine Protected Areas (E.O. 13158).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/00/02
Final Action 04/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4446
Sectors Affected: 21111 Oil and Gas Extraction; 22132 Sewage Treatment
Facilities; 221111 Hydroelectric Power Generation; 221112 Fossil Fuel
Electric Power Generation; 42271 Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals;
325412 Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing; 311711 Seafood Canning
Agency Contact: David Redford, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4504-F, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1952
Fax: 202 260-9920
James Woodley, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4504-F,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1998
Fax: 202 260-9920
Email: woodley.james@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD60
_______________________________________________________________________
3691. CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND REGULATION REVISIONS RE: USE AS
MATCHING FUNDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1383(h)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 35.3125(b)(1)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulation will revise the Clean Water State Revolving
Fund (CWSRF) Regulations to allow the use of loans from the non-Federal
and non-State match share of CWSRF funds as a match for infrastructure
grants. In 1990, EPA issued regulations implementing the CWSRF program,
established as title VI of the Clean Water Act (CWA) in 1987. Section
603(h) of the CWA prohibits use of the CWSRF loan as matching funds
with respect to the non-Federal share of the cost of a treatment works
project for which a municipality or agency is receiving assistance from
the Administrator under any other authority. In issuing its regulations
at 40 CFR 35.3125(b)(1), EPA interpreted this prohibition broadly,
applying the restriction to all treatment works construction. At that
time, EPA
[[Page 62371]]
believed the replacement of the construction grants program authorized
by title II of the CWA by the CWSRF would result in a significant
decrease in the use of other Federal grant funds for treatment works
construction. However, from FY 1995 onward, Congress has authorized and
appropriated funds for infrastructure construction grants in various
appropriations acts. There are currently over 700 projects totaling
over $3.3 billion dollars. In several cases, EPA has been asked to
allow CWSRF funds to be used as a match for these grants; but 40 CFR
35.3125(b)(1) prohibits such action. Upon reconsideration, EPA has
decided its initial reading in 1990 was too broad, and the intent of
Congress was only to prohibit use of CWSRF loans as a match for title
II construction grants. This action will revise the regulations to
allow a State, in its operation of the CWSRF, to permit a CWSRF loan
for non-title II infrastructure construction grant projects to be used
as a non-Federal match in certain circumstances. The prohibition on the
use of CWSRF as a match for a title II construction grant will
continue.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Direct Final Rule With Companion
NPRM 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4493
Agency Contact: Chau Hoang, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4204M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0689
Fax: 202 501-2396
Email: hoang.chau@epa.gov
Gary Hudiburgh, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, EN-336, 4204M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0626
Fax: 202 501-2396
Email: hudiburgh.gary@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD68
_______________________________________________________________________
3692. TEST PROCEDURES: NEW AND UPDATED TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS
OF POLLUTANTS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT AND SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq; 33 USC 1314(h); CWA 304(h); 33 USC
1361(a); CWA 501(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would amend the ``Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants'' under 40
CFR parts 136 and 141 to approve new and updated EPA methods for
wastewater, ambient water quality, and drinking water, including new
and updated versions of methods from voluntary consensus standards
bodies and other organizations. These methods are used to comply with
monitoring requirements in the wastewater, ambient water quality and/or
drinking water programs, as authorized under the Clean Water Act (CWA)
and Safe Drinking Water Act. This regulation would propose new methods
for metals such as Method 1638 (which utilizes ICP/MS), new methods for
chemical pollutants (e.g., Method 245.7), and updated methods for
chemical and biological pollutants (e.g., Methods 625 and 1625),
including methods from voluntary consensus standards bodies (VCSBs),
and from other external organizations. The new and updated methods
include methods from organizations such as the American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard Methods, Association of Official
Analytical Methods-International, and U.S. Geological Survey.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/02
Final Action 06/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4540
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD71
_______________________________________________________________________
3693. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MERCURY UNDER THE CLEAN WATER
ACT (REVISIONS TO METHOD 1631)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h); CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1361(a); CWA 501(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136.3
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, September 30, 2001, Settlement
agreement.
Final, Judicial, September 30, 2002, Settlement agreement.
Abstract: This proposal would amend EPA Method 1631 to add new
requirements for clean techniques and quality control (QC) beyond those
specified in EPA Method 1631 for the determination of mercury at water
quality criteria levels. EPA Method 1631 was promulgated at 40 CFR 136
in June 1999. Later that year, the Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers, the Chemical Manufacturers Association, and the Utility
Water Act Group (Petitioners) filed a petition for judicial review of
the final rule. One of the issues in the petition related to the clean
sampling techniques and QC requirements in the Method. As part of a
Settlement Agreement in October 2000, EPA agreed to sign a Federal
Register notice proposing additional clean techniques and QC
requirements for Method 1631 by September 30, 2001, and to take final
action by September 30, 2002.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action Technical
Correction 06/18/01 66 FR 32774
NPRM 10/09/01 66 FR 51518
NPRM Comment Period End 12/10/01
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4541
[[Page 62372]]
Agency Contact: William Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD72
_______________________________________________________________________
3694. 2002 EFFLUENT GUIDELINES PLAN
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(m) CWA
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, August 28, 2002.
Abstract: The Effluent Guidelines Plan is published biennially as
required by the Clean Water Act and a consent decree. The Plan is often
called the 304(m) Plan, based on the relevant section in the Clean
Water Act. The Plan discusses the status of ongoing rulemakings,
development of additional rules, and preliminary studies. The Plan sets
forth EPA's rationale for the selection of particular industries as
candidates for new or revised effluent guidelines. The 2002 edition
will include regulatory plans beyond those industries covered by the
consent decree, and OW will use the 2002 Plan as a strategic
opportunity to help design the future of the technology-based pollution
control program for industrial sources.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/02
Final Action 08/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4576
Agency Contact: Pat Harrigan, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8479
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: harrigan.patricia@epa.gov
Jan Matuszko, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-9126
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: matuszko.jan@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD78
_______________________________________________________________________
3695. REVISIONS TO THE NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION
CONTINGENCY PLAN; SUBPART J PRODUCT SCHEDULE LISTING REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321(d)(2); CWA section 311(d)(2)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will propose revisions to subpart J of the
National Contingency Plan (NCP) (40 CFR part 300.900). Section
311(d)(2)(G) of the Clean Water Act requires that EPA prepare a
schedule of dispersants, other chemicals, and other spill mitigating
devices and substances, if any, that may be used in carrying out the
NCP. Under subpart J, respondents wishing to add a product to the
Product Schedule must submit technical product data specified in 40 CFR
300.915 to EPA. This rulemaking will propose revisions to subpart J to
clarify and change protocols for effectiveness and toxicity testing. It
will clarify EPA authority to remove products from the Product
Schedule. These changes will help ensure protection of the environment
when these products are used to clean up and mitigate oil spills into
or upon navigable waters, adjoining shorelines, the waters of the
contiguous zone, or which may affect natural resources belonging to or
under the exclusive management authority of the United States.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4526
Sectors Affected: 54 Professional, Scientific and Technical Services;
3259 Other Chemical Product Manufacturing; 325 Chemical Manufacturing;
3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: William Nick Nichols, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5203G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-9918
Fax: 703 603-9116
Email: nichols.nick@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE87
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Clean Water Act (CWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3696. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE IRON AND STEEL
MANUFACTURING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY (REVISIONS)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA sec 301; 33 USC 1314 CWA sec 304; 33
USC 1316 CWA sec 306; 33 USC 1317 CWA sec 307; 33 USC 1318 CWA sec 308;
33 USC 1342 CWA sec 402; 33 USC 1362 CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 420
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, October 31, 2000.
Final, Judicial, April 30, 2002.
Abstract: EPA is proposing to revise the effluent limitations
guidelines and standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point
Source Category to reflect significant industry changes related to
consolidation and modernization within the U.S. steelmaking industry as
well as advances in manufacturing technologies, in-process pollution
prevention, water conservation practices, and end-of-pipe wastewater
treatment.
[[Page 62373]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/27/00 65 FR 81963
Final Action 04/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3833
Sectors Affected: 331111 Iron and Steel Mills; 3312 Steel Product
Manufacturing from Purchased Steel; 3328 Coating, Engraving, Heat
Treating and Allied Activities; 324199 All Other Petroleum and Coal
Products Manufacturing
Agency Contact: George Jett, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7151
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: jett.george@epa.gov
Kevin Tingley, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-9843
Email: tingley.kevin@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC90
_______________________________________________________________________
3697. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE BLEACHED PAPERGRADE
KRAFT SUBCATEGORY OF THE PULP, PAPER, AND PAPERBOARD CATEGORY;
CERTIFICATION IN LIEU OF MONITORING FOR CHLOROFORM
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA sec 301; 33 USC 1314 CWA sec 304; 33
USC 1316 CWA sec 306; 33 USC 1317 CWA sec 307; 33 USC 1342 CWA sec 402;
33 USC 1318 CWA sec 308; 33 USC 1361 CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 430
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action is a follow-on to the already-promulgated Pulp
and Paper Cluster Rules covering the Bleached Papergrade Kraft
Subcategory (Subpart B). EPA is considering allowing Subpart B mills to
certify process changes (specifically, elimination of elemental
chlorine and hypochlorite) and operating conditions in lieu of minimum
monitoring to demonstrate compliance with the effluent limitations for
chloroform.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/15/98 63 FR 18796
Final Action 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 4192
NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WATER/1998/April/Day-15/w9615.htm
Sectors Affected: 3221 Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills
Agency Contact: Don Anderson, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7189
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: anderson.donaldf@epa.gov
Ahmar Siddiqui, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1826
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: siddiqui.ahmar@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD23
_______________________________________________________________________
3698. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE COAL MINING POINT SOURCE
CATEGORY (REVISIONS)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA sec 301; 33 USC 1314 CWA sec 304; 33
USC 1316 CWA sec 306; 33 USC 1317 CWA sec 307; 33 USC 1318 CWA sec 308;
33 USC 1342 CWA sec 402; 33 USC 1361 CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 434
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, March 31, 2000.
Final, Judicial, December 31, 2001.
Abstract: Coal mining discharges are covered by existing effluent
guidelines at 40 CFR part 434. This new regulatory action will revise
the existing regulations to address two new subcategories: Coal
Remining and Western Alkaline Coal Mining. The existing regulations do
not cover remining operations, which, when appropriately planned and
regulated, will improve effluent quality from abandoned mine lands
while reclaiming them and prevent disturbance of unexploited lands.
Advances in treatment technologies and Best Management Practices
pertinent to coal mines in the arid West show promise of being more
protective of water quality.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/11/00 65 FR 19440
Notice of Data Availability 07/30/01 66 FR 39300
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4168
Sectors Affected: 21211 Coal Mining
Agency Contact: John Tinger, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-4992
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: tinger.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD24
_______________________________________________________________________
3699. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MISCELLANEOUS METALS, ANIONS,
AND VOLATILE ORGANICS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT, PHASE ONE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h) CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1361(a) CWA 501(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR part 136 to approve new procedures for the analysis of
miscellaneous metals, anions, and volatile organics under the Clean
Water Act (CWA). These methods are used for implementing water quality
based permits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) of the CWA. This regulation would approve test procedures to be
used in measuring this group of compounds under the NPDES Program
unless the Regional Administrator approves an alternative procedure.
EPA plans to segment the rulemaking into two phases to accommodate
different amounts of data for the long list of compounds.
[[Page 62374]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/18/95 60 FR 53988
Final Action 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3155
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC95
_______________________________________________________________________
3700. TEST PROCEDURES FOR ANALYSIS FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS UNDER
CLEAN WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h) CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1361 CWA 501(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136; 40 CFR 141
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would propose to amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR part 136 to approve EPA Method 1622 and to approve microbiological
methods for monitoring ambient water for the detection of
Cryptosporidium, Giardia, E. coli and Enterococci. in ambient waters by
filtration of a 10-L sample in laboratory, separation of target
organisms from other debris using immunomagnetic separation, and
detection of the organisms using immunofluorescence assay and
differential interference contrast microscopy and confirmation
examination of the organisms using vital dye stains. This proposed
regulation would approve test procedures to be available for use by
testing laboratories.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/30/01 66 FR 45811
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4047
Agency Contact: Robin K. Oshiro, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7278
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: oshiro.robin@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD08
_______________________________________________________________________
3701. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MISCELLANEOUS METALS, ANIONS,
AND VOLATILE ORGANICS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT, PHASE TWO
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h) CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1361(a) CWA 501(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR part 136 to approve new procedures for the analysis of
miscellaneous metals, anions, and volatile organics under the Clean
Water Act (CWA). These methods are used for implementing water quality
based permits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) of the CWA. This regulation would approve test procedures to be
used in measuring this group of compounds under the NPDES unless the
Regional Administrator approves an alternative procedure. This
rulemaking would constitute the second of two segments of rulemaking
initially proposed as one action.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/18/95 60 FR 53988
Final Action 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4089
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD12
_______________________________________________________________________
3702. TEST PROCEDURES: CLEAN WATER ACT AND SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT
METHODS UPDATE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq; CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1314(h); CWA
501(a); 33 USC 1361(a); SDWA 1412; 42 USC 300 g-1; 42 USC 300f(1); SDWA
1401(a); SDWA 1445; SDWA 1450(a); 42 USC 300j-4; 42 USC 300j-9(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136; 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 143
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR part 136, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations under 40 CFR
part 141, and National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations under 40
CFR part 143 to approve updated versions of analytical test procedures
(methods) from voluntary consensus standards bodies and other
organizations. These methods are used to comply with monitoring
requirements in the wastewater and drinking water programs, as
authorized under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Safe Drinking Water
Act (SDWA). This regulation would approve updated versions of methods
for determination of chemical, radiological, and
[[Page 62375]]
microbiological pollutants in wastewater and drinking water. The
updates are to methods from voluntary consensus standards bodies (the
American Society for Testing and Materials and Standard Methods) and
from the U.S. Geological Survey and the Department of Energy.
Previously approved versions of the methods being updated remain
approved. Because EPA received adverse comments on the direct final
rule published on January 16, 2001, the Agency withdrew the direct
final on May 15, 2001. EPA plans to issue a final rulemaking addressing
the adverse comments by early 2002, based on a companion proposal to
the direct final rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 01/16/01 66 FR 3466
Notice of Withdrawal of Direct
Final Rule 05/15/01 66 FR 26795
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4409
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD59
_______________________________________________________________________
3703. MINIMIZING ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM COOLING WATER INTAKE
STRUCTURES AT NEW FACILITIES UNDER SECTION 316(B) OF THE CLEAN WATER
ACT, PHASE 1
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA sec 301; 33 USC 1316 CWA sec 306; 33
USC 1326 CWA sec 316; 33 USC 1361 CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 125
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, July 20, 2000.
Final, Judicial, November 9, 2001.
Abstract: This rulemaking affects new facilities that use cooling water
intake structures. Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act provides that
any standard established pursuant to section 301 or 306 of the Clean
Water Act and applicable to a point source shall require that the
location, design, construction, and capacity of cooling water intake
structures reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse
environmental impact associated with the impingement and entrainment of
fish and other aquatic organisms by cooling water intake structures.
Impingement refers to trapping fish and other aquatic life on intake
screens or other devices where they may be injured or killed.
Entrainment occurs when smaller aquatic organisms, eggs and larvae are
drawn into a cooling system and then pumped back out, often with
significant injury or mortality due to heat, physical stress or
exposure to chemicals.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/10/00 65 FR 49059
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 3444
Sectors Affected: 61131 Colleges, Universities and Professional
Schools; 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 21 Mining; 22111
Electric Power Generation; 22133 Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply; 311
Food Manufacturing; 3122 Tobacco Manufacturing; 313 Textile Mills; 321
Wood Product Manufacturing; 322 Paper Manufacturing; 324 Petroleum and
Coal Products Manufacturing; 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 326 Plastics
and Rubber Products Manufacturing; 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product
Manufacturing; 331 Primary Metal Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal
Product Manufacturing; 333 Machinery Manufacturing; 334 Computer and
Electronic Product Manufacturing; 335 Electrical Equipment, Appliance
and Component Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Deborah Nagle, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2656
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: nagle.deborah@epa.gov
Debra Hart, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0905
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: hart.debra@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC34
_______________________________________________________________________
3704. TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) PROGRAM REGULATIONS
REVISIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1313
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 130
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On July 13, 2000, EPA published a final Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL) Program Regulation (65 FR 23580). At that time, EPA
expected this to become effective the end of October 2001 (30 days
after the existing Congressional restriction on implementation). On
August 9, 2001 (66 FR 41817), EPA published a proposed rule to
establish April 30, 2003 as the effective date of the final TMDL rule.
This will allow the Agency time to convene a consensus-building process
to engage the full spectrum of affected parties in developing a
successful TMDL program. The consensus-building process will consider
new information, including the recent National Academy of Sciences
report recommending changes to the TMDL program, in an effort to speed
up the cleanup of the nation's waters by developing a workable program
with broad stakeholder support.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/23/99 64 FR 46011
Final Rule 07/13/00 65 FR 43586
NPRM Delay of Effective Date 08/09/01 66 FR 41817
Delay of Final Rule Effective
Date 10/18/01 66 FR 53044
NPRM 06/00/02
Final Action 04/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
[[Page 62376]]
Additional Information: SAN No. 4145
Split from RIN 2040-AD22.
Agency Contact: Francoise M. Brasier, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4606, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-5668
Email: brasier.francoise@epa.gov
John Wilson, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4503F, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7078
RIN: 2040-AD79
_______________________________________________________________________
3705. COMPARISON OF DREDGED MATERIAL TO REFERENCE SEDIMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1344 CWA sec 404
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 230
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would revise the testing provisions of the Clean
Water Act section 404(b)(1) guidelines to provide for comparisons
between dredged material proposed for discharge and reference sediment.
Reference sediment would be defined as sediment that reflects
conditions at the disposal site had no dredged material disposal ever
occurred there. Because the disposal site itself is currently used as
the point of comparison, this action would make a technical improvement
in assessing cumulative impacts and help make dredged material testing
under section 404 more consistent with that conducted for ocean
disposal, which currently employs a reference sediment approach. This
action is not expected to have a significant impact on State, local, or
tribal governments or small business, as the action will be limited to
Corps projects and permit applications for which dredged material
testing is necessary, and because the effect of the action will be
limited to changing the location of an otherwise collected sample.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/04/95 60 FR 419
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3288
Agency Contact: John Goodin, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4502F, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-9910
Email: goodin.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC14
_______________________________________________________________________
3706. REVISION TO CLEAN WATER ACT REGULATORY DEFINITION OF ``FILL
MATERIAL''
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1344
CFR Citation: 33 CFR 323.2(e); 40 CFR 232.2
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 404 of the Clean Water Act requires a permit from the
US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for discharges of dredged or fill
material to waters of the United States. The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and Corps regulations implementing section 404 currently
contain differing definitions of the term fill material. In particular,
the Corps regulations define fill material as being used for the
primary purpose of replacing an aquatic area with dry land or changing
the bottom elevation of a waterbody. In contrast, EPA's definition of
fill material looks to whether the effect is to replace waters of the
United States with dry land or change the bottom elevation of
waterbodies, and does not contain a primary purpose test as found in
the Corps regulations. In order to clarify what constitutes fill
material for purposes of section 404 and provide improved regulatory
certainty, the Corps and EPA are conducting notice and comment
rulemaking to achieve greater consistency between the two agencies'
definitions of fill material.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/20/00 65 FR 21292
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4375
Agency Contact: Brenda Mallory, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4502F, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0044
Fax: 202 260-7546
Email: mallory.brenda@epa.gov
John Lishman, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4502F,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-9180
Fax: 202 260-7546
Email: lishman.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD51
_______________________________________________________________________
3707. ROUND 2 STANDARDS FOR THE USE OR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE SLUDGE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1345 CWA sec 405; 33 USC 1361(a) CWA sec 501(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 503 (Revisions)
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, December 15, 1999.
Final, Judicial, December 15, 2001.
Abstract: Section 405 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires EPA to
promulgate regulations providing guidelines for the use and disposal of
sewage sludge. The rules, among other things, are to identify uses for
sewage sludge, including disposal, and concentrations of pollutants
which interfere with such use or disposal. The statute establishes a
schedule for EPA to identify and regulate toxic pollutants in sewage
sludge in two rounds: first with respect to those toxic pollutants for
which information is available and subsequently, with respect to those
toxic pollutants in sewage sludge not regulated in the first round
which may adversely affect public health and the environment. The
regulations must specify management practices, including numeric
limits, for each such pollutant, for each use or disposal practice. EPA
published the first round of sewage sludge regulations, pursuant to a
court ordered schedule, in February 1993 (58 FR 9247) and proposed
round two regulations in December 1999. EPA's round two proposal
identified dioxins, dibenzofurans and coplanar polychlorinated
biphenyls as the additional toxic pollutants in sewage sludge to be
regulated for sewage sludge that is to be applied to the land. The
consent decree requires EPA to take final action on proposed round two
regulations by December 15, 2001.
[[Page 62377]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/23/99 64 FR 72045
Final Action 12/00/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3488
Agency Contact: Alan B. Rubin, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4304, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7589
Fax: 202 260-1036
Email: rubin.alan@epa.gov
Alan B. Hais, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4304, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7579
Fax: 202 260-1036
Email: hais.alan@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC25
_______________________________________________________________________
3708. PROCEDURES FOR TRIBES TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR TREATMENT AS A STATE
TO RECEIVE FUNDING FOR THE BEACHES PROGRAM
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 UCS 1375(a) et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 35; 40 CFR 130
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This interim final rule would establish procedures under the
Clean Water Act for EPA to treat Indian tribes in substantially the
same manner in which it treats States for purposes of obtaining
financial assistance.
As part of the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health Act
of 2000, EPA is authorized to award grants to develop and implement
monitoring and notification programs for coastal or Great Lakes
recreational waters. This rule will describe the requirements for
Indian tribes to become eligible for grants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Interim Final Rule 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4515
Agency Contact: Frances A. Desselle, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4305, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1320
RIN: 2040-AD69
_______________________________________________________________________
3709. RULE TO REVISE AND TO RATIFY OR WITHDRAW WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY
TEST METHODS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h); CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1361(a); CWA 501(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136.3
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, September 24, 2001, Settlement
Agreement.
Final, Judicial, September 24, 2002, Settlement Agreement.
Abstract: This regulatory action would propose to amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR part 136 by revising several whole effluent toxicity (WET) test
methods and by ratifying or withdrawing WET test methods listed in
Table IA for use under the Clean Water Act. These methods were
promulgated on October 16, 1995 (60 FR 53529). The proposed regulation
is needed to satisfy the terms of two settlement agreements (entered
into by EPA and Edison Electric Institute, et al., and Western
Coalition of Arid States on July 24, 1998; and entered into by EPA and
Lone Star Steel in January, 1997). This proposal will amend the 1995
rule by revising three WET method manuals, and by ratifying or
withdrawing each of the WET test methods challenged in the settlement
agreements from these three manuals. Specific revisions include: the
requirement of blocking by parentage in Method 1002, the requirement
for demonstration of valid concentration-response relationships, the
inclusion of specific procedures to control pH drift, and the inclusion
of procedures to reduce pathogenic interferences in Method 1000.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/28/01 66 FR 49794
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4514
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Marion Kelly, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7117
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: kelly.marion@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD73
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Clean Water Act (CWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3710. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE METAL PRODUCTS AND
MACHINERY CATEGORY, PHASES 1 AND 2
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA sec 301; 33 USC 1314 CWA sec 304; 33
USC 1316 CWA sec 306; 33 USC 1317 CWA sec 307; 33 USC 1318 CWA sec 308;
33 USC 1342 CWA sec 402; 33 USC 1361 CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 413; 40 CFR 433; 40 CFR 438; 40 CFR 463; 40 CFR
464; 40 CFR 467; 40 CFR 471
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, October 31, 2000.
Final, Judicial, December 31, 2002.
Abstract: EPA is developing effluent limitations guidelines for
facilities that generate wastewater while processing metal parts; metal
products; and machinery, including manufacture, assembly, rebuilding,
repair, and
[[Page 62378]]
maintenance. In 1995 EPA proposed regulations for seven industrial
groups: aircraft, aerospace, hardware, ordnance, stationary industrial
equipment, mobile industrial equipment, and electronic equipment. EPA
has consolidated this rulemaking with a second phase, whose scope would
include additional industrial groups such as: bus and truck, household
equipment, instruments, motor vehicles, office machines, precious
metals and jewelry, railroads, job shops, printed circuit boards, and
ships and boats. The deadlines and timetable apply to the consolidated
Phase 1 and 2 rulemaking.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM (Phase 1) 05/30/95 60 FR 28210
NPRM (Consolidated Phase 1 and
2) 01/03/01 66 FR 424
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 2806
For more information on Metal Products and Machinery on the Internet,
please visit:
http://www.epa.gov/ost/guide/mpm/index.html
Sectors Affected: 332 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing; 333
Machinery Manufacturing; 334 Computer and Electronic Product
Manufacturing; 335 Electrical Equipment, Appliance and Component
Manufacturing; 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 337
Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing; 339 Miscellaneous
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Shari Barash, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7130
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: barash.shari@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AB79
_______________________________________________________________________
3711. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE PULP, PAPER, AND
PAPERBOARD CATEGORY, PHASE II
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA 301; 33 USC 1314 CWA 304; 33 USC 1316
CWA 306; 33 USC 1317 CWA 307; 33 USC 1318 CWA 308; 33 USC 1318 CWA 402;
33 USC 1361 CWA 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 430
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA will consider revising the technology-based effluent
limitations guidelines and standards for 8 of the 12 subcategories for
this industrial category: Unbleached Kraft Semi-Chemical; Mechanical
Pulp; Non-Wood Chemical Pulp Secondary Fiber Deink; Secondary Fiber
Non-Deink; Fine and Lightweight Papers from Purchased Pulp; and Tissue,
Filter, Non-Woven, and Paperboard from Purchased Pulp. EPA proposed
guidelines and standards for these subcategories as part of the Pulp
and Paper Rules (also known as the Cluster Rules) in December 1993. The
Agency intends to develop these revised effluent limitations in close
coordination with the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/17/93 58 FR 66078
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4050
Sectors Affected: 3221 Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills
Agency Contact: Don Anderson, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7189
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: anderson.donaldf@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD10
_______________________________________________________________________
3712. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT REGULATION
AND EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR CONCENTRATED
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (CAFOS)
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA sec 301; 33 USC 1314 CWA sec 304; 33
USC 1316 CWA sec 306; 33 USC 1317 CWA sec 307; 33 USC 1318 CWA sec 308;
33 USC 1342 CWA sec 402; 33 USC 1361 CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.23; 40 CFR 412
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, December 15, 2000, Effluent guidelines
and standards only.
Final, Judicial, December 15, 2002, Effluent guidelines and standards
only.
Abstract: Feedlot operations are covered by existing effluent
guidelines at 40 CFR 412 and concentrated animal feeding operations
(CAFOs) are covered by permitting regulations at 40 CFR 122.23. This
action will revise the existing effluent guidelines primarily to
address swine, poultry, beef, and dairy cattle operations and will
revise the NPDES regulation for concentrated animal feeding operations.
The existing regulations, which require the largest confined animal
feeding operations to achieve zero discharge of wastes to surface
waters except for certain storm related discharges, have not been
sufficient to resolve water quality impairment from feedlot operations.
Feedlot operations are substantial contributors of nutrients in surface
waters that have severe anoxia (low levels of dissolved oxygen) and
problem algae blooms.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/12/01 66 FR 2959
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4153
[[Page 62379]]
This rule was formerly know as Effluent Guidelines and Standards for
Feedlots Point Source Category, and NPDES Regulation for Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operations
Sectors Affected: 11221 Hog and Pig Farming; 11232 Broilers and Other
Meat Type Chicken Production; 11231 Chicken Egg Production; 112112
Cattle Feedlots; 11212 Dairy Cattle and Milk Production; 11241 Sheep
Farming; 11233 Turkey Production; 11292 Horse and Other Equine
Production; 11239 Other Poultry Production
Agency Contact: Paul Shriner, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3163
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: shriner.paul@epa.gov
Karen Metchis, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4203,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0734
Email: metchis.karen@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD19
_______________________________________________________________________
3713. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE DISSOLVING KRAFT AND
DISSOLVING SULFITE SUBCATEGORIES OF THE PULP, PAPER, AND PAPERBOARD
POINT SOURCE CATEGORY (PHASE III)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1316; 33 USC 1317; 33
USC 1318; 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1361
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 430.10 to 430.18; 40 CFR 430.40 to 430.48
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On December 17, 1993, EPA proposed revised effluent
limitations, guidelines and standards and best management practices
regulations for the Dissolving Kraft and Dissolving Sulfite
Subcategories of the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Point Source Category
(40 CFR part 430). This action, which OW refers to as Phase III of the
Cluster Rules, will respond to comments and reflect new data. There are
five domestic mills in these two subcategories. The final rule is
anticipated to set limits for adsorbable organic halides (AOX),
chemical oxygen demand (COD), chloroform, dioxin, furan, and 12
specific chlorinated phenolics.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/17/93 58 FR 66078
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4370
Sectors Affected: 3221 Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills
Agency Contact: Don Anderson, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7189
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: anderson.donaldf@epa.gov
Ahmar Siddiqui, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1826
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: siddiqui.ahmar@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD49
_______________________________________________________________________
3714. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL CONTAINER AND
DRUM CLEANING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 et seq
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Industrial facilities that clean out 55 gallon drums and
other industrial sized containers are not currently subject to
nationally applicable wastewater treatment standards. Many types of
toxic and hazardous materials, including pesticides, solvents, and
petrochemical products are transported in bulk via drums and
containers. Most of these containers have a residue, or heel, present
in the containers before they are cleaned. The accumulation of residue
from large numbers of drums and containers may result in the discharge
of pollutants to the Nation's waterways. This regulation is expected to
cover those facilities that clean out drums and industrial sized
containers as a business, and would generally not cover industrial
facilities that clean out their own drums and containers used on site.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4408
Sectors Affected: 562998 All Other Miscellaneous Waste Management
Services
Agency Contact: John Tinger, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-4992
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: tinger.john@epa.gov
Yu-Ting Guilaran, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-3596
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: guilaran.yu-ting@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD57
_______________________________________________________________________
3715. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS REGULATION -- REVISION
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1313 CWA sec 303(c)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Water quality standards set by States and Indian tribes
establish the water quality goals for surface waters of the U.S. and
the means by which attainment of these goals will be measured and
assured. They are the foundation for protecting water quality and
related public health and welfare and the ecological health of the
nation's waters. The Federal water quality standards regulation at 40
CFR Part 131 governs the development, review and revision of water
quality standards under section 303(c) of the Clean Water Act by States
and Indian Tribes, and the review and approval of water quality
standards by EPA. Based upon the Federal, State, Tribal and local
experience gained in the program over the last 20 years, EPA's proposed
[[Page 62380]]
revisions to 40 CFR 131 are intended to strengthen the water quality
standards regulation thus enhancing water quality management on a
watershed basis, and focusing Federal, State and Tribal resources on
the areas of greatest concern. Program areas identified for revision
include mixing zone policies and procedures.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 07/07/98 63 FR 36741
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3662
Agency Contact: Jennifer Wigal, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4305, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-5177
Fax: 202 260-9830
Email: wigal.jennifer@epa.gov
Susan Gilbertson, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4305,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1188
Fax: 202 260-9830
Email: gilbertson.sue@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC56
_______________________________________________________________________
3716. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR INDIAN COUNTRY WATERS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131; 40 CFR 121.17 (New); 40 CFR 122.4 (Amended);
40 CFR 123.1 (Amended); 40 CFR 131.4 (Amended); 40 CFR 131.40 (New); 40
CFR 230.10 (Amended); 40 CFR 233.1 (Amended); 40 CFR 233.51 (Amended)
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, 90 Days after Proposal.
Abstract: EPA is considering proposing a national rule containing core
Federal water quality standards (WQS) to support tailored, site-
specific decisions for certain waters in Indian country that do not
have EPA-approved tribal standards. EPA is contemplating this rule as a
first step towards ensuring that the core Clean Water Act (CWA)
framework for protecting water quality is in place for all such waters.
The core Federal water quality standards would establish: use
designations consistent with CWA section 101(a) goals, cultural and
traditional, and other uses; water quality criteria for protecting the
designated uses; and an antidegradation policy designed to protect
water quality. Such standards would provide a basis for EPA (in
consultation with a tribe) to affect pollution discharges occurring
upstream from tribal waters, provide a basis for including water
quality based limitations or conditions in permits or certifications
for discharges within Indian country; and provide the basis for
establishing Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for Indian country
waters. A Federal promulgation would not prevent tribes from developing
their own standards. The Office of Management and Budget reviewed the
proposal and returned it to EPA on October 2, 2001, for further
consideration and analysis. EPA is considering how to proceed.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4344
Agency Contact: Fred Leutner, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4305, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1542
Fax: 202 260-9830
Email: leutner.fred@epa.gov
Edward Hanlon, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4305,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-5396
Fax: 202 260-9830
Email: hanlon.edward@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD46
_______________________________________________________________________
3717. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF TRACE METALS UNDER THE CLEAN
WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h) CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1361(a) CWA 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would propose to amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR part 136 to approve new EPA methods for the determination of trace
metals at EPA's water quality criteria levels. These methods are
necessary for the implementation of water quality-based permits under
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) of the
Clean Water Act. Water quality-based permits are necessary when
technology-based controls do not ensure that a particular water body
would meet the State's designated water quality standard. Because the
methods currently approved under 40 CFR part 136 were designed to
support primarily technology-based permitting needs, and because these
technology-based levels are as much as 280 times higher than water
quality-based criteria for metals, approval of new EPA test procedures
is necessary.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 3702
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC75
[[Page 62381]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3718. INCREASED METHOD FLEXIBILITY FOR TEST PROCEDURES APPROVED FOR
CLEAN WATER ACT COMPLIANCE MONITORING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h) CWA 304 (h); 33 USC 1361(a) CWA 501 (a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would highlight the flexibility
already contained in the 600 and 1600 series of EPA Methods that are
currently approved for Clean Water Act compliance monitoring under 40
CFR part 136, Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis
of Pollutants. These methods typically contain a statement that, in
recognition of advances that are occurring in analytical technology,
and to allow the analyst to overcome sample matrix interferences, the
analyst is permitted certain options to improve separations or lower
the costs of measurements. These options include alternate extraction,
concentration, cleanup procedures, and changes in columns and
detectors. The methods further require the analyst to demonstrate that
the method modifications will not adversely affect the quality of data
by generating quality control results that meet the specifications
contained in the method. Despite this stated flexibility, the Agency
has found that many NPDES and pretreatment permitting authorities are
not aware of this flexibility when issuing or enforcing NPDES and
pretreatment permits. Therefore, this regulatory action will highlight
the existing method flexibility and clarify EPA's position regarding
its application. This action will also extend this flexibility to other
methods currently approved under 40 CFR part 136. The purpose of
extending this flexibility to other methods is to (1) increase
consistency between methods, (2) provide for increased recognition of
advances in analytical technology, and (3) reduce costs associated with
analytical measurements.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3714
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC92
_______________________________________________________________________
3719. PERFORMANCE-BASED MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (PBMS) PROCEDURES AND
GUIDANCE FOR CLEAN WATER ACT TEST PROCEDURES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h) CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1361(a) CWA 501(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would establish the use of
performance-based measurement procedures and guidance for use in Clean
Water Act compliance monitoring under 40 CFR part 136, Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants. The new
procedures would include guidance concerning the format, content,
quality assurance/quality control, and data validation requirements for
use of test methods. This regulatory action would also describe
increased program guidance in the form of a clearinghouse, technical
bulletins, and/or guidance documents geared towards clarifying
technical and policy issues associated with the use of test methods
approved for use in the program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/28/97 62 FR 14975
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3713
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WATER/1997/March/Day-28/w7221.htm
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC93
_______________________________________________________________________
3720. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CO-PLANAR AND MONO-ORTHO-
SUBSTITUTED POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq; CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1314(h); CWA
501(a); 33 USC 1361(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136; 40 CFR 503
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would propose to amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR parts 136 and 503 to approve EPA Method 1668 for the congener-
specific determination of co-planar and mono-ortho-substituted
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in effluent, ambient water, and
sludge. This method is necessary for the implementation of water
quality-based permits under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) of the Clean Water Act. Water quality-based
permits are necessary when technology-based controls do not ensure that
a particular water body would meet the State's designated water quality
standard. At present there is no EPA analytical method for
determination of these PCBs at the levels of concern. Therefore,
approval of a new EPA test procedure is necessary.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/03
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4049
[[Page 62382]]
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD09
_______________________________________________________________________
3721. REVISIONS TO METHOD DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION FOR USE UNDER THE
CLEAN WATER ACT AND SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h); CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1361(a); CWA
501(a); 42 USC 300f; SDWA 1401
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136(b)
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, February 28, 2003, Settlement
Agreement.
Final, Judicial, September 30, 2004, Settlement Agreement.
Abstract: This regulatory action would propose to amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR part 136 related to the detection and quantification procedures
currently used by EPA for analytes regulated in the wastewater program
as authorized under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and in the drinking water
program under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). The current method
detection limit (MDL) procedure is set forth at 40 CFR part 136,
appendix B. EPA has not promulgated a generic procedure for
quantification but it uses the minimum level of quantitation (ML) in
its wastewater program and the practical quantitation level (PQL) in
its drinking water program. The ML is defined in analytical methods and
is generally set at 3.18 times the MDL. The PQL is generally set at
five to ten times the MDL. The Office of Water has been working to
revise and refine these concepts in response to the need to regulate
pollutants at low levels (often levels that are lower than measurement
capabilities will allow) and to address other potential approaches to
detection and quantification, including concepts being introduced by
outside organizations such as voluntary consensus standards bodies
(VCSBs). The rulemaking would also reevaluate the current MDL and
quantification approaches and assess alternative approaches.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/03
Final Action 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4378
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD53
_______________________________________________________________________
3722. UNIFORM NATIONAL DISCHARGE STANDARDS FOR VESSELS OF THE ARMED
FORCES - PHASE II
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1322; 33 USC 1361
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1700
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 10, 2001.
Abstract: This action is phase II of implementing regulations on
Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces.
In 1996 the Clean Water Act was amended to create section 312(n),
Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces.
Section 312(n) directs EPA and DOD to work together to provide Armed
Forces vessels with a nationally uniform set of discharge standards,
which preempt State discharge standards for these vessels. The purpose
of the statute is to allow DOD to plan, design and build
environmentally sound vessels, to encourage innovative pollution
control technology, and to improve operational flexibility. EPA and DOD
jointly promulgated Phase I of these regulations, 40 CFR part 1700, on
May 10, 1999 (64 FR 25126). The Phase I rulemaking concluded that 25
discharges from Armed Forces vessels would require control devices.
Some of these discharges have the potential to introduce oil or other
organics into receiving waters (such as bilge water); some have the
potential to introduce copper or other metals (such as fire main); and
some have the potential to introduce nonindigenous invasive aquatic
species (such as ballast water). Phase II will establish performance
standards for control devices for these 25 discharges. Once DOD
implements rules for achieving the standards set in phase II, covered
discharges from Armed Forces vessels will be required to meet these
standards, and will not be subject to discharge standards established
by States.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/03
Final Action 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4357
Agency Contact: Gregory Stapleton, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0141
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: stapleton.gregory@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD39
_______________________________________________________________________
3723. MINIMIZING ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM COOLING WATER INTAKE
STRUCTURES AT EXISTING FACILITIES UNDER SECTION 316(B) OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT, PHASE 3
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA sec 301; 33 USC 1316 CWA sec 306; 33
USC 1326 CWA sec 316; 33 USC 1361 CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 125
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, June 15, 2003.
[[Page 62383]]
Final, Judicial, December 15, 2004.
Abstract: This rulemaking affects, at a minimum, existing facilities
that use cooling water intake structures, and whose intake flow levels
exceed a minimum threshold EPA will determine during this rulemaking.
The affected facilities include: (1) electricity generating facilities
not covered by Phase 2 regulations; (2) pulp and paper manufacturing
facilities; (3) chemicals and allied products manufacturing facilities;
(4) petroleum and coal products manufacturing facilities; and (5)
primary metals manufacturing facilities. Section 316(b) of the Clean
Water Act provides that any standard established pursuant to sections
301 or 306 of the Clean Water Act and applicable to a point source
shall require that the location, design, construction, and capacity of
cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available
for minimizing adverse environmental impact. A primary purpose of this
action is to minimize the impingement and entrainment of fish and other
aquatic organisms by cooling water intake structures. Impingement
refers to trapping fish and other aquatic life against cooling water
intake structures. Entrainment occurs when aquatic organisms, eggs and
larvae are drawn into the cooling system, through the heat exchanger,
and then pumped back out with significant injury or mortality to the
entrained organisms.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/03
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4543
Split from RIN 2040-AC34.
Sectors Affected: 326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing; 325
Chemical Manufacturing; 324 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing;
322 Paper Manufacturing; 321 Wood Product Manufacturing; 313 Textile
Mills; 3122 Tobacco Manufacturing; 311 Food Manufacturing; 22133 Steam
and Air-Conditioning Supply; 21 Mining; 211111 Crude Petroleum and
Natural Gas Extraction; 211112 Natural Gas Liquid Extraction; 22111
Electric Power Generation; 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product
Manufacturing; 331 Primary Metal Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal
Product Manufacturing; 333 Machinery Manufacturing; 334 Computer and
Electronic Product Manufacturing; 335 Electrical Equipment, Appliance
and Component Manufacturing; 336 Transportation Equipment
Manufacturing; 61131 Colleges, Universities and Professional Schools
Agency Contact: Deborah Nagle, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2656
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: nagle.deborah@epa.gov
Debra Hart, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0905
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: hart.debra@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD70
_______________________________________________________________________
3724. STREAMLINING THE GENERAL PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS FOR EXISTING AND
NEW SOURCES OF POLLUTION
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314 CWA sec 304; 33 USC 1317 CWA sec 307; 33
USC 1342 CWA sec 402; 33 USC 1361 CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 403
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The final rule will be promulgated as a program streamlining
activity. The rule will revise certain provisions in the General
Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR part 403) that address restrictions on
and oversight of industrial discharges into Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTWs). The final rule will include exclusions or variable
requirements for smaller facilities that contribute insignificant
amounts of pollutants, clarify requirements for implementing
Pretreatment Standards, and provide more flexible reporting, inspection
and sampling requirements. The revisions should provide greater
flexibility, reduce burden, and achieve improved environmental results
at less cost for regulatory authorities and the regulated community.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/22/99 64 FR 39564
Final Action 12/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3663
NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WATER/1999/July/Day-22/w17773.htm
Agency Contact: Jeff Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4203M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0652
Fax: 202 564-6431
Email: smith.jeff@epa.gov
Jan Pickerel, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4203M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7904
Fax: 202 564-6431
Email: pickerel.jan@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC58
_______________________________________________________________________
3725. NPDES STREAMLINING RULE -- ROUND III
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA sec 301; 33 USC 1312 CWA sec 302; 33
USC 1314 CWA sec 304; 33 USC 1316 CWA sec 306; 33 USC 1318 CWA sec 308;
33 USC 1342 CWA sec 402; 33 USC 1361 CWA sec 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 124
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA plans to issue several rulemaking packages to revise
NPDES requirements in parts 122, 123, and 124 to eliminate redundant
regulations, provide clarification, and remove or streamline
unnecessary procedures. Revisions under consideration in this rule
include adding additional permit modifications that can be considered
minor modifications at 122.63, and changes to requirements concerning
EPA's review of State permits. Other revisions may be considered as
work on this rule progresses. This rulemaking is expected to affect
entities which implement the NPDES program or are regulated by it. This
includes
[[Page 62384]]
small businesses and State, tribal and local governments. Most of these
effects are expected to be deregulatory or streamlining in nature.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/06
Final Action 08/00/07
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 3786
Agency Contact: Thomas Charlton, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4203, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6960
Fax: 202 564-9544
Email: charlton.tom@epa.gov
Howard Rubin, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4203, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2051
Fax: 202 564-9544
Email: rubin.howarde@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC84
_______________________________________________________________________
3726. CLEAN WATER ACT DEFINITION OF WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1361 CWA sec 501; 33 USC 1362 CWA sec 502
CFR Citation: 33 CFR 328.3(a); 40 CFR 110.1; 40 CFR 112.2; 40 CFR
116.3; 40 CFR 117.1; 40 CFR 122.2; 40 CFR 230.3(s); 40 CFR 232.2; 40
CFR 257.3-1(d); 40 CFR 300, app E; 40 CFR 401.11(I)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action involves joint rulemaking by EPA and the
Department of the Army to amend the regulatory definition of waters of
the United States. The proposal would clarify the jurisdictional status
under the Clean Water Act (CWA) of so-called ``isolated'' intrastate
waters and wetlands. The existing regulations contain language
asserting jurisdiction over isolated intrastate waters, but that
regulatory provision has been the subject of a January 9, 2001, U.S.
Supreme Court opinion. Revision of the regulatory language is necessary
to address the Court's decision, improve regulatory clarity, and
provide more specificity regarding CWA jurisdiction. The rulemaking
would clarify CWA jurisdiction for entities (e.g., industrial,
commercial, governmental) that discharge pollutants, including dredged
or fill material, to isolated intrastate surface waters or wetlands.
Significant impacts on small entities or State/local/tribal governments
are not anticipated, as the proposed regulatory revisions would be
consistent with the Supreme Court ruling.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/02
Final Action 12/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 2804
Agency Contact: Donna Downing, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4502F, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-8795
Fax: 202 260-7546
Email: downing.donna@epa.gov
John Lishman, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4502F,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-9180
Fax: 202 260-7546
Email: lishman.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AB74
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Clean Water Act (CWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3727. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF E. COLI AND ENTEROCOCCI UNDER
THE CLEAN WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136.3
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Merged into RIN 2040-AD08, SAN
No. 4047 07/17/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Agency Contact: William A. Telliard
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD34
_______________________________________________________________________
3728. REVISION OF NPDES INDUSTRIAL PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND
FORM 2C--WASTEWATER DISCHARGE INFORMATION
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.21(e)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn - No Further Action
Planned at This Time 10/01/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Agency Contact: Ruby Cooper-Ford
Phone: 202 564-0767
Fax: 202 564-6431
Email: ford.ruby@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC26
_______________________________________________________________________
3729. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MERCURY UNDER THE
CLEAN WATER ACT (REVISIONS TO METHOD 1631)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(h); CWA 304(h); 33 USC 1361(a); CWA 501(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136.3
[[Page 62385]]
Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, June 15, 2001, Direct Final.
Abstract: EPA plans to publish a correction notice on Method 1631 prior
to proposal of the new clean techniques and QC requirements to clarify
the use of field blank subtraction.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Technical Corrections 06/18/01 66 FR 32774
Merged into RIN 2040-AD72, SAN
No. 4541 09/13/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4581
Merged into RIN 2040-AD72.
Agency Contact: William Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7134
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: telliard.william@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303 ,
Phone: 202 260-1639
Fax: 202 260-7185
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD74
_______________________________________________________________________
3730. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM REINVENTION PILOT PROJECTS UNDER PROJECT XL
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 403
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 10/03/01 66 FR 50334
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Agency Contact: Chad Carbone
Phone: 202 260-4296
Fax: 202 260-1812
Email: carbone.chad@epa.gov
Brian Frazer
Phone: 202 260-0101
Fax: 202 260-1460
Email: frazer.brian@epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA16
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3731. DRINKING WATER: REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS REGARDING CONTAMINANTS
ON THE DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANT CANDIDATE LIST
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq; SDWA 1412(b)(1)(B)
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, August 6, 2001, Final Regulatory
Determination.
Abstract: The 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
requires EPA to publish a list of non-regulated contaminants every five
years, which may warrant regulation due to their health effects and
their potential for occurrence in public water systems (PWSs). The
first list, called the Contaminant Candidate List (CCL), was published
in the Federal Register on March 2, 1998 (63 FR 10274). When
establishing the 1998 CCL, EPA divided the contaminants among three
main categories: 1) contaminants which are priorities for additional
research; 2) contaminants which need additional occurrence data; and 3)
contaminants which are priorities for consideration for rulemaking.
These contaminants are collectively referred to as the Regulatory
Determination Priority contaminants. In addition to publishing the
drinking water CCL, the SDWA also requires the Agency to select five or
more contaminants from the CCL and determine, by August 2001, whether
to regulate these contaminants with a National Primary Drinking Water
Regulation (NPDWR). The Regulatory Determination Priority category is
the list of contaminants from which the Agency will determine whether
or not regulations are necessary. There are currently nine contaminants
that have sufficient scientific information to make regulatory
determinations: Acanthamoeba; Aldrin; Dieldrin; Hexachlorobutadiene;
Manganese; Metribuzin Napthalene; Sodium; and Sulfate. In order make a
decision whether or not to develop a NPDWR for a contaminant, the SDWA
requires three statutory tests be met: (1) the contaminant may have an
adverse effect on the health of persons; (2) the contaminant is known
to occur or there is a substantial likelihood that the contaminant will
occur in public water systems with a frequency and at levels of public
health concern; and (3) in the sole judgment of the Administrator,
regulation of the contaminant presents a meaningful opportunity for
health risk reduction for persons served by public water systems. Using
these three statutory tests to make regulatory decisions, there are
three possible outcomes: (1) regulate the contaminant with a NPDWR; (2)
develop guidance (e.g., Health or Consumer Advisory); or (3) determine
no regulatory action is necessary. Once a regulatory decision is made,
the contaminant is removed from the CCL.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice of Preliminary Regulatory
Determinations 12/00/01
Notice of Final Regulatory
Determinations 06/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4447
SDWA requires a final determination of whether or not NPDWR(s) are
necessary for no less than 5 contaminants on the CCL.
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Dan Olson, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-6269
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: olson.daniel@epa.gov
Karen Wirth, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0720
[[Page 62386]]
Fax: 202 260-3762
Email: wirth.karen@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD61
_______________________________________________________________________
3732. 6-YEAR REVIEW OF EXISTING NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER
REGULATIONS
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 116 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2040-AD67
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3733. NATIONAL SECONDARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS (NSDWR): METHYL
TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) AND TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE NSDWR
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 143 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) is a fuel additive used
primarily to increase the oxygen content in gasoline. It has been used
in increasing quantity in the 1990s to meet the requirements of the
Federal Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) and Oxyfuels programs required by
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Although the use of MTBE in
gasoline has helped to reduce harmful air emissions, it is being
detected in ground water and surface water throughout the country. In
some instances the affected waters are drinking water sources. At
relatively low levels, MTBE's taste and odor can make drinking water
supplies unacceptable to consumers. In this action, EPA is proposing a
secondary standard for MTBE, which would provide guidance for taste and
odor acceptability and to protect the public welfare.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/02
Final Action 08/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4404
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: James Taft, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-5519
Fax: 202 260-3762
Email: taft.james@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD54
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3734. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: RADON
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 146 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2040-AA94
_______________________________________________________________________
3735. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: ARSENIC AND
CLARIFICATIONS TO COMPLIANCE AND NEW SOURCE CONTAMINANT MONITORING
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 147 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.
RIN: 2040-AB75
_______________________________________________________________________
3736. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: LONG TERM 1 ENHANCED
SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: SDWA 1412(b); SDWA 1445(a)(1)(A)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9 (Revision); 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 30, 2000.
Abstract: The purposes of the Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR) are to improve control of microbial
pathogens, specifically the protozoan Cryptosporidium, in drinking
water and address risk trade-offs with disinfection by-products. The
LT1ESWTR builds upon the framework established for systems serving a
population of 10,000 or more in the Interim Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule (IESWTR). The LT1ESWTR applies to public water systems
that use surface water or ground water under the direct influence of
surface water and serve fewer than 10,000 persons and includes the
following provisions: (1) 2-log removal of Cryptosporidium; (2)
compliance with specific combined filter fluent turbidity requirements;
(3) continuous turbidity monitoring for individual filters with follow-
up activities based on monitoring results; (4) development of a
disinfection profile unless applicability monitoring at a particular
plant demonstrated TTHM and HAA5 levels less than 0.064 mg/L and 0.048
mg/L respectively; (5) development of a Giardia inactivation
disinfection benchmark and consultation with the State before making a
significant change in disinfection practices; (6) mandatory covers for
all newly constructed finished water reservoirs; and (7) unfiltered
system compliance with
[[Page 62387]]
updated watershed control requirements that add Cryptosporidium as a
pathogen of concern.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/10/00 65 FR 19095
Final Action 01/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4147
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Tom Grubbs, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7270
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: grubbs.thomas@epa.gov
Patricia Hall, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-5750
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: hall.patricia@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD18
_______________________________________________________________________
3737. UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL CLASS V PHASE 2 REVISIONS
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300(h); Safe Drinking Water Act 1421-1425
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, April 30, 2001.
Final, Judicial, May 31, 2002.
Abstract: The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) requires EPA to protect
current and future underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) from
the endangerment posed by Class V underground injection control (UIC)
wells. Class V UIC wells are typically shallow waste disposal systems
that are diverse in purpose, design, geographic distribution, the
nature of the fluids injected, and endangerment potential. In
accordance with the judicial deadlines in a consent agreement, EPA
finalized specific regulations addressing two types of high risk UIC
Class V injection wells (motor vehicle waste disposal wells and large-
capacity cesspools) in December 1999. That regulatory action is
informally referred to as the UIC Class V Phase 1 Rule. Also, in
accordance with the consent agreement, EPA must evaluate all other
Class V well types and determine if additional specific requirements
are necessary to protect USDWs and if so, finalize the appropriate
requirements. On May 7, 2001, EPA published a proposed determination
that existing federal regulation of Class V well is adequate to protect
drinking water supplies, and that additional federal UIC regulations
are not needed at this time to prevent Class V wells from endangering
underground sources of drinking water. EPA is currently evaluating the
public comment received on the proposed determination and plans to
publish a final determination by May 2002.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice of Proposed Determination05/07/01 66 FR 22971
Final Action - Notice of Final
Determination 05/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4451
Agency Contact: Robyn Delehanty, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4606, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1993
Fax: 202 260-0732
Email: delehanty.robyn@epa.gov
Ryan McReynolds, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4606
Phone: 202 260-3709
Fax: 202 260-0732
Email: mcreynolds.ryan@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD63
_______________________________________________________________________
3738. MINOR REVISIONS TO THE PUBLIC NOTIFICATION RULE AND THE
CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT RULE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: As part of a settlement agreement, EPA agreed to make
specific changes to the health effects language, in the Public
Notification and Consumer Confidence Report Rules, concerning di(2-
ethylhexyl)adipate (DEHA) and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP). With
respect to DEHA, the proposed new wording would replace a reference to
``general toxic effects'' with specific toxic effects wording (i.e.,
weight loss and liver enlargement) and add the word ``possible'' to the
reference to reproductive effects. With respect to DEHP, the proposed
revision would add the word ``well'' in front of the phrase in excess
of the MCL to describe when the health effects may be experienced. In
addition, this proposal would include a negotiated paragraph on the
proper use of the Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
EPA is also making the following minor changes to the Consumer
Confidence Report Rule: removing ``leaching from wood preservatives''
as a likely source for copper contamination; revising appendix A to
move some disinfection byproducts contaminants from the ``volatile
organic contaminants'' section to the ``inorganic contaminants''
section; and revising appendix A to change ``chloride dioxide'' to
``chlorine dioxide.''
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/07/01 66 FR 46928
NPRM Comment Period End 10/09/01
Final Action 09/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: State, Local, Tribal, Federal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4561
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Kathy Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4606, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2589
Fax: 202 401-2345
Email: williams.kathleena@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD77
[[Page 62388]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3739. USE OF SCREENING METHODS FOR COMPLIANCE MONITORING OF DRINKING
WATER CONTAMINANTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f SDWA 1401; 42 USC 300g-1 SDWA 1412; 42 USC
300j-4 SDWA 1445
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 143
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Amendments require
EPA to review new analytical methods that may be used for regulated
contaminants screening or analysis, including screening methods. After
this review, EPA may approve such methods that are deemed more accurate
or cost-effective than established reference methods for use in
compliance monitoring or the monitoring of unregulated contaminants. In
this advanced notice of proposed rulemaking, EPA announces its
intention to integrate the use of screening methods in the overall
scheme of drinking water compliance monitoring. Efforts will be made to
keep the proposal consistent with the Office of Water plan for
Performance Based Methods (PBMS). EPA will identify regulated
contaminates, types of monitoring and specific areas within each
monitoring framework which are amenable to the use of screening
methods. A logical application of screening procedures would be in a
tiered monitoring mode where Tier 1 (screening phase) would identify
the principal problem areas while Tier 2 would use sampling and
analysis to more carefully identify and quantify specific contaminants.
EPA would identify specific screening methods which are available for
use based on their performance characteristics, tolerance to sample
interferences, validation for drinking water analysis and correlation
of results with traditional instrumental methods. The use of screening
methods is expected to make drinking water compliance monitoring
cheaper and faster, and provide flexibility to the Public Water Systems
in the choice of analytical methods. Laboratory acceptance limits and
other method performance requirements that were specified under
previous rules will not be changed in this rule making. The final
action would only add new analytical methods and/or analytical
approaches and would not withdraw or modify previously approved
methods.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 10/00/02
NPRM 07/00/03
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN No. 4212
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Dr. Jitendra Saxena, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-9579
Fax: 202 260-3762
Email: saxena-jitendra@epa.gov
Dr. Richard Reding, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, U.S. EPA
Facilities, Cincinnati, OH 45268
Phone: 513 569-7961
Fax: 513 569-7191
Email: reding.richard@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD31
_______________________________________________________________________
3740. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: GROUNDWATER RULE
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f; SDWA 1412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 400 to 406; 40 CFR 142 14 to 16 (revision)
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 2003.
Abstract: EPA has proposed a targeted risk-based regulatory strategy
for all public water systems served by groundwater. The proposed
requirements provide a meaningful opportunity to reduce public health
risk associated with the consumption of waterborne pathogens from fecal
contamination for a substantial number of people served by ground water
sources. The proposed strategy addresses risks through a multiple-
barrier approach that relies on five major components: periodic
sanitary surveys of ground water systems requiring the evaluation of
eight elements and the identification of significant deficiencies;
hydrogeologic assessments to identify wells sensitive to fecal
contamination; source water monitoring for systems drawing from
sensitive wells without treatment or with other indications of risk; a
requirement for correction of significant deficiencies and fecal
contamination through the following actions: eliminate the source of
contamination, correct the significant deficiency, provide an
alternative source water, or provide a treatment which achieves at
least 99.99 percent (4-log) inactivation or removal of viruses, and
compliance monitoring to insure disinfection treatment is reliably
operated where it is used.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/10/00 65 FR 30194
Final Action 12/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.
Additional Information: SAN No. 2340
Statutory deadline for final: After August 6, 1999 but before the
Administrator promulgates a stage II rulemaking for disinfection and
disinfection byproducts.
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/safewater/gwr.html
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Eric Burneson, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1445
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: burneson.eric@epa.gov
Tracy Bone, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-2954
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: bone.tracy@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AA97
[[Page 62389]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3741. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: ALDICARB
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq; SDWA 1412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA promulgated MCLs for aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide, and
aldicarb sulfone in the Phase II rulemaking in 1991 at levels of 0.003,
0.004, and 0.002 ug/l, respectively. In response to an administrative
petition from the manufacturer Rhone-Poulenc, the Agency issued an
administrative stay of the effective date. EPA will reexamine risk
assessment and occurrence data on aldicarb and make a determination of
what further action is appropriate.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Final Action 08/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 3238
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Dan Olson, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-6269
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: olson.daniel@epa.gov
Karen Wirth, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0720
Fax: 202 260-3762
Email: wirth.karen@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC13
_______________________________________________________________________
3742. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: LONG TERM 2 ENHANCED
SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 40 USC 300g-1(b); SDWA 1412(b); 42 USC 300f; 42 USC
300g-1; 42 USC 300g-2; 42 USC 300g-3; 42 USC 300g-4; 42 USC 300g-5; 42
USC 300g-6; 42 USC 300j-4; 42 USC 300j-9; 42 USC 300j-11
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 to 142; 40 CFR 9
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
(LT2ESWTR) will control risk from microbial pathogens in drinking
water. It is being developed simultaneously with the Stage 2
Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (DBPR) which will
address risk caused by the use of disinfectants in drinking water. This
rule could affect all public water systems that use surface water as a
source. Promulgating the LT2ESWTR and the Stage 2 DBPR as a paired
rulemaking is necessary to ensure that adequate protection from
microbial risk is maintained while EPA manages risk from disinfection
byproducts. In developing the LT2ESWTR, EPA will analyze a significant
body of new survey data on microbial pathogens in source and finished
waters, as well as data on parameters which could serve as indicators
of microbial risk. This survey data, which was collected under the
Information Collection Rule (ICR), Supplemental Surveys to the ICR, and
additional research projects, will provide a substantially more
comprehensive and complete picture of the occurrence of waterborne
pathogens than was available previously. EPA will also use significant
new data on the efficiency of treatment processes for the removal and
inactivation of microorganisms, as well as new information on the
pathogenicity of certain pathogens, to determine effective regulatory
requirements for controlling microbial risk. On March 30, 1999 EPA
established a committee of stakeholders under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA) to assist in the development of these rules and an
agreement in principle was signed in September 2000 outlining the
proposed rule options.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 11/00/02
NPRM 11/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4341
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Dan Schmelling, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1439
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: schmelling.dan@epa.gov
Thomas Grubbs, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7270
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: grubbs.thomas@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD37
_______________________________________________________________________
3743. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: STAGE 2
DISINFECTANTS/DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS RULE
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 40 USC 300g-1(b); SDWA 1412(b); 42 USC 300f; 42 USC
300g-2; 42 USC 300g-3; 42 USC 300g-4; 42 USC 300g-5; 42 USC 300g-6; 42
USC 300j-4; 42 USC 300j-9; 42 USC 300j-11
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 to 142; 40 CFR 9
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 2003.
Abstract: This Regulation, along with a Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface
Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR) that will be promulgated
simultaneously, is
[[Page 62390]]
intended to expand existing public health protections and address
concerns about risk trade-offs between pathogens and disinfection
byproducts. This rule could affect all public water systems that add a
disinfectant to the drinking water during any part of the treatment
process although the impacts may be limited to community water systems
(CWSs) and non-transient non-community water systems (NTNCWSs).
Promulgating the LT2ESWTR and the Stage 2 DBPR as a paired rulemaking
is necessary to ensure that adequate protection from microbial risk is
maintained while EPA manages risk from disinfection byproducts. In
developing the Stage 2 DBPR, EPA will analyze a significant body of new
survey data on source water quality parameters, treatment data and
disinfection byproduct occurrence. This survey data, which was
collected under the Information Collection Rule (ICR), Supplemental
Surveys to the ICR, and additional research projects, will provide a
substantially more comprehensive and complete picture of the occurrence
of DBPs and microbiological pathogens than was available previously.
EPA will also use new information on the health effects of exposure to
DBPs to determine effective regulatory requirements for controlling
risk. On March 30, 1999 EPA reconvened a committee of stakeholders
under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to assist in the
development of these rules and an Agreement in Principle was signed in
September 2000 outlining the proposed rule options.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/02
Final Action 11/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.
Additional Information: SAN No. 4342
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Jennifer McLain, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-0431
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: mclain.jennifer@epa.gov
Thomas Grubbs, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7270
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: grubbs.thomas@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD38
_______________________________________________________________________
3744. REGULATED DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANT OCCURRENCE REPORTING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 142.15
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Office of Water will revise the National Primary Drinking
Water Regulations to require public water systems and States to report
regulated drinking water contaminant occurrence level data to EPA. At
present, States only report violation data for the purpose of
compliance tracking, as concentrations that exceed the Maximum
Contaminant Level. The data will be compared to health effects levels
and used to compare occurrence frequency with monitoring requirements.
The results of these analyses may be used to modify existing
regulations during the statutorily required 6-year regulatory review
cycle.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/02
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN No. 4369
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Charles Job, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4606, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7084
Email: job.charles@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD48
_______________________________________________________________________
3745. UPDATE OF STATE UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAMS
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300h-1; SDWA sec 1422; 42 USC 300h-4; SDWA sec
1425
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 147 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA provides a place in part 147 of its UIC regulations where
all the State UIC programs are summarized. Included in this
summarization are all the authorities and regulations used by the
States to implement the UIC program, as well as all other documents
that are relevant to the program. The primary reason for this is to
provide one place where all the UIC programs nationwide are presented.
A second reason, more importantly, is to allow EPA to incorporate by
reference into the Code of Federal Regulations the State program
authorities. Current citations to State regulations in 40 CFR part 147
are out of date for many States. This update is necessary to ensure
that the CFR accurately reflects current approved State UIC programs
and that elements of those programs are federally enforceable if
necessary. EPA Regional Offices will be submitting State revision
packages as they are completed. Part 147 will then be updated in
several stages. This is the first stage. This effort should have no
impact on the regulated community because we will merely be
incorporating by reference elements of already effective State
programs.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 09/00/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN No. 4236
Agency Contact: Mario Salazar, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4606, Washington, DC 20460
[[Page 62391]]
Phone: 202 260-2363
Fax: 202 260-0732
Email: salazar.mario@epa.gov
Bruce Kobelski, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4606,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7275
Fax: 260 202-4656
RIN: 2040-AD40
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3746. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: SULFATE
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Merged into RIN 2040-AD61, SAN
No. 4447 09/13/01
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Agency Contact: Dan Olson
Phone: 202 260-6269
Fax: 202 401-6135
Email: olson.daniel@epa.gov
Karen Wirth
Phone: 202 260-0720
Fax: 202 260-3762
Email: wirth.karen@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC07
_______________________________________________________________________
3747. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: FILTER BACKWASH
RECYCLING RULE
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141.76; 40 CFR 142.16
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 06/08/01 66 FR 31086
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Agency Contact: Katie Leo
Phone: 202 260-0052
Fax: 202 401-2345
Email: leo.katie@epa.gov
Philip Berger
Phone: 202 260-7006
TDD Phone: 202 401-6135
Email: berger.philip@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD65
_______________________________________________________________________
3748. UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING REGULATION FOR
PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS; AMENDMENT TO THE LIST 2 RULE AND PARTIAL DELAY OF
REPORTING OF MONITORING RESULTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), EPA published
Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation (UCMR)
for public water systems on September 17, 1999, which included lists of
contaminants for which monitoring was required or would be required in
the future once analytic methods were established for them. The Agency
supplemented these revisions to the UCMR on January 11, 2001,
establishing analytical methods for contaminants and activating
monitoring requirements for some of the contaminants on the UCMR lists.
This regulation corrects the January 2001 UCMR to include that public
water system laboratories that have been certified to use EPA Method
515.3 are automatically certified to use EPA Method 515.4 for
unregulated contaminant monitoring analysis and delays requirements for
electronic reporting of unregulated contaminant monitoring results
until EPA's data system is able to accept data.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 09/04/01 66 FR 46221
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN No. 4560
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Chuck Job, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4606, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-7084
Fax: 202 401-3041
Email: job.charles@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD75
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Shore Protection Act (SPA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3749. SHORE PROTECTION ACT, SECTION 4103(B) REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 2601 Shore Protection Act of 1988; PL 100-688
4103(b)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 237
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will implement the Shore Protection Act (SPA) and
is designed to prevent the deposit of municipal and commercial waste
into U.S. Coastal Waters. This rule establishes minimum waste handling
practices for vessels and waste handling facilities involved in the
transport of municipal or commercial wastes in the coastal waters of
the United States. The rule may require certain vessels and waste
handling facilities to develop an operation and maintenance manual that
identifies procedures to prevent, report, and clean up deposits of
waste into coastal waters. Local governments and businesses involved
with the vessel transportation and shore side handling of these wastes
would be affected by
[[Page 62392]]
this rule. Currently no tribes are known to be involved in waste
handling of this type; therefore none would be affected by this rule.
In regards to small businesses, EPA has provided guidance on
development of operation and maintenance manuals and encourages the use
and documentation of existing industry practices that meet or exceed
the EPA proposed minimum waste handling standards. All indications are
that this regulation as proposed would have a minimal economic impact.
This regulation will result in reduction of municipal and commercial
wastes deposited in coastal waters.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/30/94 59 FR 44798
Final Action 02/00/02
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Local
Additional Information: SAN No. 2820
Agency Contact: Steven Giordano, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4504F, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-6419
Fax: 202 260-9920
Email: giordano.steven@epa.gov
James Woodley, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4504-F,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 260-1998
Fax: 202 260-9920
Email: woodley.james@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AB85
[FR Doc. 01-26705 Filed 11-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S