GFDL - Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

Skip to main content

Bibliography - John Austin

  1. Randel, W, and John Austin, et al., January 2009: An update of observed stratospheric temperature trends. Journal of Geophysical Research, D02107, doi:10.1029/2008JD010421.
    [ Abstract ]
  2. Tourpali, K, and John Austin, et al., February 2009: Clear sky UV simulations for the 21st century based on ozone and temperature projections from Chemistry-Climate Models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9(4), 1165-1172.
    [ Abstract PDF ]
  3. Austin, John, K Tourpali, E Rozanov, H Akiyoshi, S Bekki, G Bodeker, and E Manzini, et al., 2008: Coupled chemistry climate model simulations of the solar cycle in ozone and temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D11306, doi:10.1029/2007JD009391.
    [ Abstract ]
  4. Austin, John, and T Reichler, December 2008: Long-term evolution of the cold point tropical tropopause: Simulation results and attribution analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D00B10, doi:10.1029/2007JD009768.
    [ Abstract ]
  5. Austin, John, et al., in press: Coupled chemistry climate model simulations of stratospheric temperatures and their trends for the recent past. Geophysical Research Letters. 12/08.
    [ Abstract ]
  6. Charlton-Perez, A J., L M Polvani, John Austin, and F Li, 2008: The frequency and dynamics of stratospheric sudden warmings in the 21st century. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D16116, doi:10.1029/2007JD009571.
    [ Abstract ]
  7. Li, Feng, John Austin, and R John Wilson, 2008: The strength of the Brewer-Dobson Circulation in a changing climate: Coupled chemistry-climate model simulations. Journal of Climate, 21(1), 40-57.
    [ Abstract PDF ]
  8. Yang, Q, Q Fu, John Austin, A Gettelman, Feng Li, and H Vömel, October 2008: Observationally derived and general circulation model simulated tropical stratospheric upward mass fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D00B07, doi:10.1029/2008JD009945.
    [ Abstract ]
  9. Austin, John, R John Wilson, Feng Li, and H Vömel, 2007: Evolution of water vapor concentrations and stratospheric age of air in coupled chemistry-climate model simulations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 64(3), doi:10.1175/JAS3866.1.
    [ Abstract ]
  10. Austin, John, L L Hood, and B E Soukharev, 2007: Solar cycle variations of stratospheric ozone and temperature in simulations of a coupled chemistry-climate model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7(6), 1693-1706.
    [ Abstract PDF ]
  11. Damski, J, L Thölix, L Backman, J Kaurola, P Taalas, John Austin, N Butchart, and M Kulmala, May 2007: A chemistry-transport model simulation of middle atmospheric ozone from 1980 to 2019 using coupled chemistry GCM winds and temperatures. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7, 2165-2181.
    [ Abstract PDF ]
  12. Eyring, V, and John Austin, et al., 2007: Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, D16303, doi:10.1029/2006JD008332.
    [ Abstract ]
  13. Andersen, S B., and John Austin, et al., 2006: Comparison of recent modeled and observed trends in total column ozone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D02303, doi:10.1029/2005JD006091.
    [ Abstract ]
  14. Austin, John, and Feng Li, 2006: On the relationship between the strength of the Brewer-Dobson circulation and the age of stratospheric air. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L17807, doi:10.1029/2006GL026867.
    [ Abstract ]
  15. Austin, John, and R John Wilson, 2006: Ensemble simulations of the decline and recovery of stratospheric ozone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D16314, doi:10.1029/2005JD006907.
    [ Abstract ]
  16. Eyring, V, and John Austin, et al., November 2006: Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D22308, doi:10.1029/2006JD007327.
    [ Abstract ]
  17. Austin, John, 2005: Comment on the paper: On the design of practicable numerical experiments to investigate stratospheric temperature change, by S. Hare et al. (2005). Atmospheric Science Letters, 6(3), doi:10.1002/asl.107.
    [ Abstract ]
  18. Eyring, V, N R P Harris, M Rex, T G Shepherd, D W Fahey, G T Amanatidis, John Austin, M P Chipperfield, M Dameris, P M D Forster, A Gettelman, H F Graf, T Nagashima, P A Newman, S Pawson, M J Prather, J A Pyle, R J Salawitch, B D Santer, and D W Waugh, 2005: A strategy for process-oriented validation of coupled chemistry-climate models. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 86(8), doi:10.1175/BAMS-86-8-1117.
    [ Abstract ]
  19. Struthers, H, K Kreher, John Austin, J T Schofield, G Bodeker, P Johnston, H Shiona, and A Thomas, November 2004: Past and future simulations of NO2 from a coupled chemistry-climate model in comparison with observations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 4, 2227-2239.
    [ Abstract PDF ]
  20. Austin, John, and N Butchart, 2003: Coupled chemisty-climate model simulations for the period 1980 to 2020: Ozone depletion and the start of ozone recovery. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 129(595), Part B, 3225-3249.
    [ Abstract PDF ]
  21. Shine, K P., M S Bourqui, P M D Forster, S H E Hare, U Langematz, P Braesicke, V Grewe, M Ponater, C Schnadt, C A Smith, J D Haigh, John Austin, N Butchart, D Shindell, W Randel, T Nagashima, R W Portmann, S Solomon, D J Seidel, John R Lanzante, Stephen A Klein, V Ramaswamy, and M Daniel Schwarzkopf, 2003: A comparison of model-simulated trends in stratospheric temperatures. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 129(590), 1565-1588.
    [ Abstract PDF ]

Direct link to page: http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/bibliography/resultstest.php?author=1128