Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 99 107* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 114* 126* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 108* 116* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 106* 114* Bloomington, IN....................... 102* 106 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 114* 125* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 127* 132* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 86* 94 Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 115* 109* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 103* 114* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 115* 124* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 123* 124* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 110* 112* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 114* 116* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 112* 125* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 98* 107* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 109* 121* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 110* 121* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 116* 121* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 119* 118* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 107* 120* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 114* 115* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 113* 108* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 107* 110* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 105* 118* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 127* 135* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 107* 114* Honolulu, HI.......................... 117* 130* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 108* 120* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 108* 111* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 108* 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 108* 90* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 133* 100 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 122* 94* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 125* 103* Bloomington, IN....................... 120* 91* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 133* 107* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 142* 118* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 114* 79* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 123* 112* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 120* 89* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 120* 105 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 141* 111* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 129* 106* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 130* 105* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 123* 105* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 117* 87* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 129* 97 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 122* 99 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 131* 111* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 136* 107* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 119* 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 127* 99 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 123* 108* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 123* 98 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 116* 101 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 142* 126* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 110* 95* Honolulu, HI.......................... 130* 118* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 127* 89* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 124* 102 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 127* 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 101 107* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 107* 128* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 115* 116* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 106* 118* Bloomington, IN....................... 92* 109* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 110* 117* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 118* 139* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 76* 93* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 113* 119* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 107* 113* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 124* 124* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 121* 133* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 102 117* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 109* 122* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 116* 119* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 96* 104* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 112* 120* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 107* 111* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 116* 124* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 109 126* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 105* 112* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 117* 123* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 116* 118* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 95* 116* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 96* 113* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 119* 136* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 101 115* Honolulu, HI.......................... 120* 116* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 106* 118* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 113* 112* Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 105 116* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 73* 91* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 82* 108* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 79* 112* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 78* 102 Bloomington, IN....................... 69* 88* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 96 100 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 113* 124* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 60* 92* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 104 113* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 71* 89* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 81* 107* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 119* 121* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 82* 107* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 93 110* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 90* 108 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 85* 85* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 81* 104 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 92* 107* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 84* 116* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 92* 105 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 103 96* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95* 112* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 108* 106* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 80* 99 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 72* 90* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 104 120* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 92* 95* Honolulu, HI.......................... 105 115* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 81* 99 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 81* 98 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 87* 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 92* 96* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 104 111* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 96* 96* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 88* 99 Bloomington, IN....................... 97 109* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 109* 108* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 109* 116* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 76* 77* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 108* 107* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 102 106* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 102 103 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 105* 109* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 100 103 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 104 109* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 96 102 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92* 89* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 91* 101 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 106* 106* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 100 107* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 117* 113* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 97* 103* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 100 114* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 101 102 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 102 106* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 106* 97* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 112* 112* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 100 105* Honolulu, HI.......................... 110 104 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 102 97 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 101 99 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 106* 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 110* 124* Johnstown, PA......................... 96* 96 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 111* 111* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 116* 117* Knoxville, TN......................... 104* 125* Lincoln, NE........................... 100 102 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 121* 131* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 107* 110* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 107* 117* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 110* 126* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 115* 121* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 123* 134* Mobile, AL............................ 101* 95* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 110* 110* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 130* 140* Ocala, FL............................. 101 97 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 102* 104 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 103 111 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 106* 104 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 118* 129* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 111* 124* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 109* 115* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 118* 121* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 123* 129* Reading, PA........................... 115* 134* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 109* 115* Richmond, VA.......................... 110* 119* Rochester, NY......................... 110* 108 Rockford, IL.......................... 111* 107* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 120* 104* Johnstown, PA......................... 110* 91* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 128* 101 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 125* 119* Knoxville, TN......................... 129* 86* Lincoln, NE........................... 111* 95* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 139* 114* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 119* 107* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 115* 91* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 127* 104* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 125* 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 136* 120* Mobile, AL............................ 108* 89* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 130* 98* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 152* 120* Ocala, FL............................. 108* 96* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 115* 94* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 111* 98 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 113* 105 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 141* 109* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 132* 103 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 124* 100 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 127* 116* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 147* 120* Reading, PA........................... 120* 104* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 123* 102 Richmond, VA.......................... 124* 101 Rochester, NY......................... 125* 110* Rockford, IL.......................... 127* 102* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 104* 118* Johnstown, PA......................... 95* 102 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 111* 119* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 113* 121* Knoxville, TN......................... 110* 114* Lincoln, NE........................... 93* 106* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 126* 129* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 110* 116* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 111* 118* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 106* 118* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 117 125* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 121* 126* Mobile, AL............................ 105* 111* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 113* 120* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 128* 140* Ocala, FL............................. 103* 110* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 98 107* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 112* 106* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 106* 106* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 109* 128* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 118* 119* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 100 118* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 126* 128* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 113* 129* Reading, PA........................... 117* 123* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 116* 117* Richmond, VA.......................... 105* 122* Rochester, NY......................... 108* 118* Rockford, IL.......................... 109* 116* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 94* 110* Johnstown, PA......................... 87* 96* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 93 107 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 98 103 Knoxville, TN......................... 74* 92* Lincoln, NE........................... 76* 101 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 101 118* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 97 100 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 85* 107* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 84* 103 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 99 110* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 101 112* Mobile, AL............................ 83* 106 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 84* 100 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 121* 123* Ocala, FL............................. 73* 114* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 93 115* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 82* 98 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 83* 111* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 120* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 75* 111 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 88* 104 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 105 119* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 102 119* Reading, PA........................... 93* 116* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 86* 118* Richmond, VA.......................... 83* 109* Rochester, NY......................... 89* 95 Rockford, IL.......................... 97 106* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 101 102 Johnstown, PA......................... 85* 90* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 106 101 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 97 108* Knoxville, TN......................... 88* 100 Lincoln, NE........................... 90* 97* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 100 108* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 100 95* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 97 100 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 95* 105 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 104 110* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 115* 112* Mobile, AL............................ 93* 105* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 101 109* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 106* 114* Ocala, FL............................. 92* 107* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 86* 87* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 86 112* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 107* 110* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 99 108* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 97 104 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 98 99 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 100 103 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 111* 110* Reading, PA........................... 102 103 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 97 102 Richmond, VA.......................... 102 104* Rochester, NY......................... 99 103* Rockford, IL.......................... 102 106* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 122* 125* Salinas, CA........................... 128* 139* San Antonio, TX....................... 103* 114* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 123* 131* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 134* 137* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 124* 125* Springfield, MA....................... 124* 123* Springfield, MO....................... 99 102 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 116* 117* Tallahassee, FL....................... 104 101 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 106* 109* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 103* 104* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 111* 129* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 122* 127* York-Hanover, PA...................... 110* 128* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 108* 121* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 144* 117* Salinas, CA........................... 156* 123* San Antonio, TX....................... 121* 91* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 143* 120* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 154* 129* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 133* 123* Springfield, MA....................... 146* 111* Springfield, MO....................... 113* 90* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 130* 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 112* 100 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 118* 98 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 118* 97* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 135* 105* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 144* 110* York-Hanover, PA...................... 129* 102* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 122* 97* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 116* 128* Salinas, CA........................... 142* 136* San Antonio, TX....................... 107* 110* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 116* 128* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 137* 146* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 125* 128* Springfield, MA....................... 122* 134* Springfield, MO....................... 102 105* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 107 121* Tallahassee, FL....................... 101 110 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 108* 117* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 102* 111* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 109* 118* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 118* 136* York-Hanover, PA...................... 100 116* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 96* 111* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 92 124* Salinas, CA........................... 114* 115* San Antonio, TX....................... 88* 110* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 101 117* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 112* 123* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 100 115* Springfield, MA....................... 99 111 Springfield, MO....................... 70* 94* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 109* 119* Tallahassee, FL....................... 73* 94* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 89* 102 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 76* 101 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 80* 97 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 91* 123* York-Hanover, PA...................... 90* 106* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 86* 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 114* 113* Salinas, CA........................... 102 108* San Antonio, TX....................... 98 92* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 105 105 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 108* 113* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 117* 116* Springfield, MA....................... 109* 117* Springfield, MO....................... 93* 101 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 106 115* Tallahassee, FL....................... 93* 97 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93 106 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 92* 93* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 103* 97* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 107* 110* York-Hanover, PA...................... 97* 108* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 101 115* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.