Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 85* 97 Anchorage, AK......................... 106* 109 Atlanta, GA........................... 98 106 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 91* 93* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 92* 95 Birmingham, AL........................ 91* 96 Bloomington, IN....................... 87* 93* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 108* 115* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 75* 76* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 97* 95 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 90* 102 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 97 104 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 105* 109* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 94* 97 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 97* 100 Columbus, OH.......................... 96* 104 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 84* 96 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 95* 104 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 95* 103 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 98 103 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 102* 101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 93* 100 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96* 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 97* 97 Great Falls, MT....................... 84* 89* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 92* 95 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 91* 99 Hartford, CT.......................... 108* 113* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 92* 92* Honolulu, HI.......................... 101 110 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 93* 104 Huntsville, AL........................ 92* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89* 77* Anchorage, AK......................... 105* 108* Atlanta, GA........................... 107* 86* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 105* 79* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 99 83* Birmingham, AL........................ 100 90* Bloomington, IN....................... 101 80* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 114* 100 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 100 68* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 95* 94* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 99 77* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 97 87* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 112* 95* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 104 91* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 106* 87* Columbus, OH.......................... 97 89* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 98 73* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 106* 85* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 97* 86* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 107* 88* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 110* 90* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 99 85* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 99 83* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 102 93* Great Falls, MT....................... 79* 83* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 99 84* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 94* 86* Hartford, CT.......................... 114* 106* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 93* 80* Honolulu, HI.......................... 109* 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 103 77* Huntsville, AL........................ 100 85* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 86* 87* Anchorage, AK......................... 103 106* Atlanta, GA........................... 93* 104* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 79* 96* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 95* 97* Birmingham, AL........................ 90* 96* Bloomington, IN....................... 75* 88* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 101 113* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 71* 77* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 100 99 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 96* 93* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 104 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 101 109* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 90 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 91* 101 Columbus, OH.......................... 101 99 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 84* 84* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 98 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 92* 92* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 99 102 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 96 106* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 91* 92* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 101 101 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 104* 100 Great Falls, MT....................... 84* 81* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 82* 97* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 87* 93* Hartford, CT.......................... 103 112* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 87* 95* Honolulu, HI.......................... 100 99 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 91* 98 Huntsville, AL........................ 96 96* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 74* 87* Anchorage, AK......................... 113* 118* Atlanta, GA........................... 84* 110* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 86* 104* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 79* 107* Birmingham, AL........................ 76* 106* Bloomington, IN....................... 70* 91* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 112* 123* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 61* 84* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 100 107* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 72* 88* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 83* 105 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 112* 122* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 81* 105* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 91* 109* Columbus, OH.......................... 88* 107 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83* 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 81* 102 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 90* 114* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 82* 112* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 99 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 98 99 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 89* 112* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 95* 102 Great Falls, MT....................... 107* 107* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 82* 105* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 74* 90* Hartford, CT.......................... 103 116 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 88* 98 Honolulu, HI.......................... 101 124* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 82* 102 Huntsville, AL........................ 82* 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91* 92* Anchorage, AK......................... 117* 110* Atlanta, GA........................... 105 106 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 100 95* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 96* 91* Birmingham, AL........................ 88* 98 Bloomington, IN....................... 99 104* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 110* 110* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 77* 76* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 114* 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 103 104* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 106 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 106* 106* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 102 99 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 107* 105* Columbus, OH.......................... 98 101 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 91* 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 92* 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 109* 104* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 105* 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 120* 108* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 100 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 97 111* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 104* 100 Great Falls, MT....................... 98 91* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 103* 104* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 107* 95* Hartford, CT.......................... 114* 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 102 101 Honolulu, HI.......................... 108 103 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 102 95 Huntsville, AL........................ 101 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis, IN...................... 93* 85* Iowa City, IA......................... 95* 99 Johnstown, PA......................... 85* 90* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96* 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 89* 108* Lincoln, NE........................... 86* 88* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 103* 110* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 93* 95 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 90* 88* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 92* 100 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 93* 111* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 99 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 104* 106 Mobile, AL............................ 85* 85* New Orleans, LA....................... 92* 94* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 110* 119* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 88* 90* Ocala, FL............................. 87* 91 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 88* 91* Orlando, FL........................... 90* 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 102* 111* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 94* 104 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 93* 95 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 101 108 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 104* 114* Reading, PA........................... 98* 110* Reno, NV.............................. 95* 102 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 95* 102 Rochester, NY......................... 94* 93* Rockford, IL.......................... 97* 94 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 103* 107 Salinas, CA........................... 109* 120* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Indianapolis, IN...................... 102 86* Iowa City, IA......................... 100 90* Johnstown, PA......................... 95* 79* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 100 85* Knoxville, TN......................... 103 75* Lincoln, NE........................... 92* 81* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 114* 97* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 100 92* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 85* 90* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 97* 81* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 85* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 101 89* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 110* 105* Mobile, AL............................ 90* 74* New Orleans, LA....................... 101 81* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 121* 102 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 94* 84* Ocala, FL............................. 92* 81* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89* 81* Orlando, FL........................... 92* 83* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 112* 93* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 106 85* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 102 87* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 100 99 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 117* 100 Reading, PA........................... 98 89* Reno, NV.............................. 99 88* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 100 87* Rochester, NY......................... 102 92* Rockford, IL.......................... 102 88* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 112* 99 Salinas, CA........................... 127* 102* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis, IN...................... 91* 98 Iowa City, IA......................... 88* 101 Johnstown, PA......................... 82* 85* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 92* 100 Knoxville, TN......................... 94* 95* Lincoln, NE........................... 81* 87* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 110* 106* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 94* 98* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 91* 89* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 99 98* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 91* 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 97 104* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 104 103* Mobile, AL............................ 91* 90* New Orleans, LA....................... 96* 96* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 107* 114* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 89* 91* Ocala, FL............................. 88* 88* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89* 89* Orlando, FL........................... 96 91* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 106* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 102 101 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 85* 97* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 105 105 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 98 106* Reading, PA........................... 102 102* Reno, NV.............................. 96* 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 95* 99* Rochester, NY......................... 91* 98* Rockford, IL.......................... 95* 97* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 97 104* Salinas, CA........................... 123* 112* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis, IN...................... 83* 102 Iowa City, IA......................... 91* 109* Johnstown, PA......................... 87* 95* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 98 112 Knoxville, TN......................... 76* 93* Lincoln, NE........................... 77* 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 99 114* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 101 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 83* 108* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 85* 105* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 81* 100 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 99 109* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 102 115* Mobile, AL............................ 84* 104* New Orleans, LA....................... 81* 98 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 115* 122* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 78* 101 Ocala, FL............................. 75* 113* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91* 115* Orlando, FL........................... 82* 100 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 120* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 74* 107 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 87* 102 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 103 118* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 93* 115* Reading, PA........................... 91* 107* Reno, NV.............................. 87* 119* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 83* 106* Rochester, NY......................... 84* 95 Rockford, IL.......................... 100 111* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 92* 126* Salinas, CA........................... 119* 118* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Indianapolis, IN...................... 111* 98 Iowa City, IA......................... 103 95* Johnstown, PA......................... 86* 82* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 106 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 90* 95* Lincoln, NE........................... 92* 91* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 101 102 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 101 93* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 107* 103 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 99 96* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 99 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 108* 106* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 119* 107* Mobile, AL............................ 98 91* New Orleans, LA....................... 97 100 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 107* 109* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 95* 89* Ocala, FL............................. 97 103* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 90* 87* Orlando, FL........................... 87 106 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 102 107* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 98 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 101 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 103 99 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 114* 105* Reading, PA........................... 101 102 Reno, NV.............................. 100 101 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 104* 100 Rochester, NY......................... 102 99 Rockford, IL.......................... 105* 103* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 113* 107* Salinas, CA........................... 97 103* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Antonio, TX....................... 86* 97 San Diego, CA......................... 105* 111* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 115* 119* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 105* 107 Springfield, MA....................... 105* 109* Springfield, MO....................... 84* 86* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 98 101 Tallahassee, FL....................... 88* 84* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 92* 93 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 96* 106 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 104* 108 York, PA.............................. 93* 107 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 93* 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Antonio, TX....................... 95* 78* San Diego, CA......................... 116* 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 122* 109* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 104* 105* Springfield, MA....................... 115* 94* Springfield, MO....................... 93* 74* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 104 83* Tallahassee, FL....................... 94* 85* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 95* 85* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 103* 90* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 113* 94* York, PA.............................. 103 87* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 98 81* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Antonio, TX....................... 80* 92* San Diego, CA......................... 101 106* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 118* 122* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 106* 108* Springfield, MA....................... 108* 111* Springfield, MO....................... 87* 86* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 95 99 Tallahassee, FL....................... 88* 91* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 94* 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 97* 97* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 102 112* York, PA.............................. 87* 95* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 88* 92* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Antonio, TX....................... 87* 104* San Diego, CA......................... 96 115* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 110* 126* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 114* Springfield, MA....................... 95* 118* Springfield, MO....................... 69* 97* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 106 114* Tallahassee, FL....................... 79* 93* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87* 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 83* 100 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 90* 124* York, PA.............................. 92* 106* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 89* 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Antonio, TX....................... 97 85* San Diego, CA......................... 106* 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 111* 108* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 120* 112* Springfield, MA....................... 110* 114* Springfield, MO....................... 95* 89* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 106 108 Tallahassee, FL....................... 96 93* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 95 102 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 107* 96* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 110* 105* York, PA.............................. 98 102 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 104* 110* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.