Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 83* 96 Anchorage, AK......................... 104* 107 Atlanta, GA........................... 96* 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 89* 92* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 90* 94 Birmingham, AL........................ 89* 95 Bloomington, IN....................... 85* 91* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 106* 113* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 74* 75* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 95* 94* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 88* 101 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 95* 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 102 107* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 92* 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 95* 99 Columbus, OH.......................... 94* 103 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83* 95 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 93* 103 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 93* 102 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 96* 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 91* 99 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 94* 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 95* 95 Great Falls, MT....................... 83* 87* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 90* 94* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 89* 98 Hartford, CT.......................... 106* 112* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 90* 91* Honolulu, HI.......................... 99 109 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 91* 103 Huntsville, AL........................ 91* 97 Indianapolis, IN...................... 91* 84* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81* 86* Anchorage, AK......................... 96 120* Atlanta, GA........................... 98 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 96* 88* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 91* 92* Birmingham, AL........................ 91* 100 Bloomington, IN....................... 93* 89* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 104 111* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 91* 75* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 87* 105* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 90* 85* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 89* 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 103 106* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 95* 102 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 97 97 Columbus, OH.......................... 89* 99 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 90* 82* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 97 94* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 88* 95* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 98 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90* 95* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 91* 93* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 93* 103* Great Falls, MT....................... 73* 92* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 90* 94* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 86* 96* Hartford, CT.......................... 104 117* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 85* 89* Honolulu, HI.......................... 99 109* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 94* 86* Huntsville, AL........................ 92* 94* Indianapolis, IN...................... 93* 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89* 82* Anchorage, AK......................... 107 100 Atlanta, GA........................... 97 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 82* 91* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 99 92* Birmingham, AL........................ 94 91* Bloomington, IN....................... 78* 83* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 105 107* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 74* 73* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 104 94* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 100 88* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 108 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 105 104* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 94 93* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 95 96* Columbus, OH.......................... 105 94* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 87* 80* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 102 94* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 96 87* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 103 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 94 87* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 105 96* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 108 95* Great Falls, MT....................... 87* 76* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 86* 92* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 90* 89* Hartford, CT.......................... 108 106* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 91* 90* Honolulu, HI.......................... 104 94* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 95 93* Huntsville, AL........................ 100 91* Indianapolis, IN...................... 94 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 75* 84* Anchorage, AK......................... 114 114* Atlanta, GA........................... 85* 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 87* 100 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 80* 102 Birmingham, AL........................ 77* 102 Bloomington, IN....................... 71* 87* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 113 118* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 61* 80* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 101 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 73* 84* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 84* 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 113* 117* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 82* 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 92 105 Columbus, OH.......................... 89 103 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 84* 83* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 82* 98 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91 109* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 83* 108 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 100 95 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 90 107 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 96 98 Great Falls, MT....................... 108 103 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 83* 101 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 75* 86* Hartford, CT.......................... 104 111 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 89 94 Honolulu, HI.......................... 103 119* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 83* 98 Huntsville, AL........................ 83* 93 Indianapolis, IN...................... 85* 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 76* 85* Anchorage, AK......................... 97 102 Atlanta, GA........................... 88* 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 83* 88* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 79* 84* Birmingham, AL........................ 73* 91* Bloomington, IN....................... 83* 96 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 92* 102 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 64* 71* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 94* 93* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 86* 97 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 88* 92* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 88* 98 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 84* 92* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 89* 98 Columbus, OH.......................... 82* 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 75* 80* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 77* 91* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91* 97 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 87* 91 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 83* 94* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 81* 103 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 86* 93* Great Falls, MT....................... 82* 85* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 86* 96 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 89* 88* Hartford, CT.......................... 94 99 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 85* 94 Honolulu, HI.......................... 90 96 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 85* 88* Huntsville, AL........................ 84* 86* Indianapolis, IN...................... 92* 91* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 93* 97 Johnstown, PA......................... 83* 89* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 94* 96 Knoxville, TN......................... 88* 106* Lincoln, NE........................... 84* 87* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 101 109* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 91* 94* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 88* 87* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 90* 99 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 91* 110* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 97* 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 102 105 Mobile, AL............................ 84* 84* New Orleans, LA....................... 90* 93* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 108* 118* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86* 89* Ocala, FL............................. 85* 90 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 86* 90* Orlando, FL........................... 88* 97 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 100 110* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 92* 102 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 91* 94 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 99 107 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 102* 113* Reading, PA........................... 96* 108* Reno, NV.............................. 93* 100 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 98* 99 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 93* 101 Rochester, NY......................... 92* 92* Rockford, IL.......................... 95* 93* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 101 106 Salinas, CA........................... 107* 119* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 91* 101 Johnstown, PA......................... 87* 88* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91* 94* Knoxville, TN......................... 94* 83* Lincoln, NE........................... 84* 90* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 104* 107* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 92* 102 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 78* 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 88* 90* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 91* 95* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 93* 99 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 117* Mobile, AL............................ 82* 83* New Orleans, LA....................... 92* 90* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 111* 113* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86* 93* Ocala, FL............................. 84* 90* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 81* 90* Orlando, FL........................... 84* 92 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 103 104* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 97 95* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 93* 97 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 91* 110* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 106* 111* Reading, PA........................... 90* 99 Reno, NV.............................. 91* 98 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 91* 111* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91* 97* Rochester, NY......................... 93* 102 Rockford, IL.......................... 93* 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 110* Salinas, CA........................... 116* 114* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 91* 96* Johnstown, PA......................... 85* 80* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 94* Knoxville, TN......................... 98 90* Lincoln, NE........................... 85* 82* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 114* 101 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 98 93* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 95 84* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 104 92* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 94 92* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 101 99 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 108 98 Mobile, AL............................ 94 85* New Orleans, LA....................... 100 91* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 111* 108* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 93 86* Ocala, FL............................. 92* 84* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 92* 85* Orlando, FL........................... 100 86* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 100 100 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 106 96* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 89* 92* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 110 100 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 102 100 Reading, PA........................... 106 97* Reno, NV.............................. 100 94* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 104 95* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 99 93* Rochester, NY......................... 95 93* Rockford, IL.......................... 99 92* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 101 98 Salinas, CA........................... 128* 106* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 92 105 Johnstown, PA......................... 88* 91* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 99 107 Knoxville, TN......................... 77* 89* Lincoln, NE........................... 78* 96 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 100 109* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 100 96 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 84* 104 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 86* 101 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 82* 96 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 100 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 103 110 Mobile, AL............................ 85* 100 New Orleans, LA....................... 82* 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 116* 117* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 79* 96 Ocala, FL............................. 75* 109* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 92 111* Orlando, FL........................... 83* 96 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 97 115* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 75* 103 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 88* 98 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 104 113* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 94 111* Reading, PA........................... 93 103 Reno, NV.............................. 88* 114* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 101 96 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 84* 101 Rochester, NY......................... 85* 91 Rockford, IL.......................... 101 107 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 94 121* Salinas, CA........................... 120* 113* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 85* 89* Johnstown, PA......................... 71* 76* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 88* 90* Knoxville, TN......................... 75* 88* Lincoln, NE........................... 77* 84* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 84* 95 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 84* 87* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 89* 95 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 82* 89* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 82* 91* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 89* 99 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 99 99 Mobile, AL............................ 81* 84* New Orleans, LA....................... 81* 93* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 89* 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 79* 82* Ocala, FL............................. 80* 95 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 75* 80* Orlando, FL........................... 72* 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 85* 99 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 82* 93 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 84* 89* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 85* 92* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 95* 97 Reading, PA........................... 84* 94 Reno, NV.............................. 83* 94* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 83* 93* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 86* 92* Rochester, NY......................... 84* 92* Rockford, IL.......................... 87* 96 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 94 100 Salinas, CA........................... 81* 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Antonio, TX....................... 84* 96 San Diego, CA......................... 102 110* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 113* 118* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 103* 106 Springfield, MA....................... 103* 108* Springfield, MO....................... 82* 85* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 96* 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 86* 83* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 90* 92* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 94* 104 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 102 106 York, PA.............................. 91* 105 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 91* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Antonio, TX....................... 87* 86* San Diego, CA......................... 106* 111* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 112* 121* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 95* 117* Springfield, MA....................... 105* 104* Springfield, MO....................... 85* 83* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 95* 93* Tallahassee, FL....................... 86* 95* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87* 94* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 94* 100 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 103 105* York, PA.............................. 94* 97* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 89* 90* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Antonio, TX....................... 84* 87* San Diego, CA......................... 105 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 123* 115* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 110* 102 Springfield, MA....................... 113* 105* Springfield, MO....................... 90* 82* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 99 94* Tallahassee, FL....................... 92* 86* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 98 94* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 101 92* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 106 106* York, PA.............................. 90* 90* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 92* 87* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Antonio, TX....................... 88* 99 San Diego, CA......................... 98 110* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 111 121* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 101 109* Springfield, MA....................... 96 113* Springfield, MO....................... 70* 93* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 107 110 Tallahassee, FL....................... 80* 89* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 88 96 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 84* 96 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 91 119* York, PA.............................. 93 101 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 90 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Antonio, TX....................... 81* 79* San Diego, CA......................... 88* 93 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 92* 100 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 104 Springfield, MA....................... 92* 106 Springfield, MO....................... 79* 82* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 88* 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 80* 86* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 79* 95 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 89* 89* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 92* 98 York, PA.............................. 81* 95 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 87* 102 * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.