TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89* 78* Anchorage, AK......................... 110* 112* Atlanta, GA........................... 103* 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 97* 90* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 96* 91* Birmingham, AL........................ 95* 91* Bloomington, IN....................... 94* 97 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT 112* 110* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.. 81* 82* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 103* 87* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 92* 89* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 97 93* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 108* 107* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 100 97 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 100 91* Columbus, OH.......................... 101 107* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 87* 87* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 99 101 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 98* 100 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 101 94 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 106* 101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 98* 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96* 90* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 103* 98* Great Falls, MT....................... 90* 90* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 99* 102 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 97* 99 Hartford, CT.......................... 112* 106 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 97* 90* Honolulu, HI.......................... 103* 99 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 97* 98 Huntsville, AL........................ 95* 98 Indianapolis, IN...................... 99 92* Iowa City, IA......................... 101 94* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 87* 86* Anchorage, AK......................... 103 121* Atlanta, GA........................... 101 97* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 101 91* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 93* 94* Birmingham, AL........................ 92* 100 Bloomington, IN....................... 90* 93* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT 107* 113* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.. 97* 77* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 93* 109* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 94* 85* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 93* 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 107* 106* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 99 101 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 99 98 Columbus, OH.......................... 96 98 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92* 83* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 102 95* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 95* 96* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 103* 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 107* 103* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 100 93* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 94* 91* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 97* 105* Great Falls, MT....................... 84* 93* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 93* 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 92* 95* Hartford, CT.......................... 109* 121* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 96* 92* Honolulu, HI.......................... 108* 106* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 101 87* Huntsville, AL........................ 96* 92* Indianapolis, IN...................... 98 101 Iowa City, IA......................... 100 106* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91* 89* Anchorage, AK......................... 106 107* Atlanta, GA........................... 101 106* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 84* 99 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 101 98* Birmingham, AL........................ 97 97* Bloomington, IN....................... 94* 90* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT 113* 116* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.. 86* 78* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 104* 99 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 100 96* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 85 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 108* 111* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 108* 102 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 98 102 Columbus, OH.......................... 117 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92* 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 107* 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 99 92* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 103 104* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 102 104* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 97 92* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 99* 96* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 112* 101* Great Falls, MT....................... 90* 82* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 104* 100 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 91* 98* Hartford, CT.......................... 113* 112* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 97* 100 Honolulu, HI.......................... 100 99 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 98 98 Huntsville, AL........................ 95 96* Indianapolis, IN...................... 96 98 Iowa City, IA......................... 95* 103* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 85* 84* Anchorage, AK......................... 123* 108* Atlanta, GA........................... 103 105* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 83* 100 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 95* 98 Birmingham, AL........................ 84* 90* Bloomington, IN....................... 83* 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT 118* 112* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.. 72* 80* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 108* 98* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 82* 87* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 96 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 124* 111* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 87* 99 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 102 108* Columbus, OH.......................... 102 98 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 78* 80* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 89* 95* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 107* 106* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 95 110* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 112* 103 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 100 87* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 98 102 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 122* 96* Great Falls, MT....................... 125* 103 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 96* 98* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 81* 87* Hartford, CT.......................... 118* 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 83* 90* Honolulu, HI.......................... 107 110* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 91* 97 Huntsville, AL........................ 97 90* Indianapolis, IN...................... 96 102 Iowa City, IA......................... 104* 91* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 94* 94* Anchorage, AK......................... 116* 114* Atlanta, GA........................... 99 112* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 102 93* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 98* 93* Birmingham, AL........................ 92* 96* Bloomington, IN....................... 98 108* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT 109* 114* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.. 73* 79* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 110* 106* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 93* 108* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 100 104* Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 107* 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 102 101 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 108* 104 Columbus, OH.......................... 98 99 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 88* 88* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 89* 102 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 109* 97* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 99 105* Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 118* 105 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 98* 113* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 101 104* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 107* 103* Great Falls, MT....................... 100 86* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 101 105* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 104* 101 Hartford, CT.......................... 108* 112* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 100 107* Honolulu, HI.......................... 96 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 99 94* Huntsville, AL........................ 97* 94 Indianapolis, IN...................... 106* 100 Iowa City, IA......................... 95* 103 See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA......................... 89* 90* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 97* 94* Knoxville, TN......................... 92* 96* Lincoln, NE........................... 89* 91* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 105* 104* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 101 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 91* 95* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 94* 92* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 95* 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 101 102 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 108* 106* Mobile, AL............................ 94* 103 New Orleans, LA....................... 93* 100 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 112* 113* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC.. 93* 92* Ocala, FL............................. 90* 91* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91* 97* Orlando, FL........................... 93* 93 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 106* 109* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 100 95 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 96* 94* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 101 101 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA.. 108* 115* Reading, PA........................... 103* 122* Reno, NV.............................. 97* 93* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 102* 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 98* 99 Rochester, NY......................... 98* 97* Rockford, IL.......................... 101* 88* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 107* 107* Salinas, CA........................... 113* 115* San Antonio, TX....................... 90* 92* San Diego, CA......................... 105* 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 117* 112* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA......................... 89* 91* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 92* 95 Knoxville, TN......................... 91* 90* Lincoln, NE........................... 87* 90* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 109* 108* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 101 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 83* 93* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 88* 88* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 94* 92* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 94* 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 103* 120* Mobile, AL............................ 92* 86* New Orleans, LA....................... 97* 86* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 114* 114* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC.. 94* 92* Ocala, FL............................. 86* 91* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 86* 90* Orlando, FL........................... 91* 88* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 109* 107* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 102 97 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 95* 97 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 94* 112* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA.. 110* 116* Reading, PA........................... 98* 100 Reno, NV.............................. 95* 99 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 96* 112* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 97* 98* Rochester, NY......................... 98* 105* Rockford, IL.......................... 99 101 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 106* 116* Salinas, CA........................... 122* 117* San Antonio, TX....................... 93* 84* San Diego, CA......................... 110* 114* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 117* 123* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA......................... 89* 84* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 100 Knoxville, TN......................... 100 92* Lincoln, NE........................... 81* 88* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 108* 107* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 94* 97* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 94* 87* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 97* 96* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 94* 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 110 102 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 109* 106* Mobile, AL............................ 103* 94* New Orleans, LA....................... 106* 92* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 108* 113* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC.. 94* 95* Ocala, FL............................. 93* 92* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 87* 87* Orlando, FL........................... 100 93* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 99 108* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 107 103 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 93* 98 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 106 100 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA.. 104* 108* Reading, PA........................... 102 99 Reno, NV.............................. 101 94* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 107* 98* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 97* 99* Rochester, NY......................... 93* 97* Rockford, IL.......................... 100 93* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 108 105* Salinas, CA........................... 119* 105* San Antonio, TX....................... 98 90* San Diego, CA......................... 107* 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 113* 121* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA......................... 91* 98 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 100 Knoxville, TN......................... 84* 89* Lincoln, NE........................... 85* 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 113* 107* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 106* 99 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 93* 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 89* 106* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 84* 101 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 110* 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 110* 109* Mobile, AL............................ 98 93* New Orleans, LA....................... 84* 92* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 128* 112* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC.. 87* 95* Ocala, FL............................. 79* 88* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91* 99 Orlando, FL........................... 87* 97 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 107* 106* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 89* 99 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 97 94* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 119* 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA.. 103* 95* Reading, PA........................... 108* 101 Reno, NV.............................. 92* 106* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 106* 91* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 87* 101 Rochester, NY......................... 90* 85* Rockford, IL.......................... 112* 103* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 100 114* Salinas, CA........................... 119* 117* San Antonio, TX....................... 89* 89* San Diego, CA......................... 102 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 123* 112* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA......................... 88* 83* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 104 98 Knoxville, TN......................... 89* 102 Lincoln, NE........................... 89* 91* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 99 97 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 98* 94* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 94* 101 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 97* 95* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 97 96 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 103 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 113* 110* Mobile, AL............................ 94* 95* New Orleans, LA....................... 91* 91* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 103 113* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC.. 88* 94* Ocala, FL............................. 88* 100 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 94* 98 Orlando, FL........................... 91 100 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 105 108* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 95* 103 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 95 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 95* 98 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA.. 104* 107* Reading, PA........................... 103* 105* Reno, NV.............................. 95* 100 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 94* 97* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 96* 106* Rochester, NY......................... 98* 102* Rockford, IL.......................... 106* 104* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 104 113* Salinas, CA........................... 103 96 San Antonio, TX....................... 98 90* San Diego, CA......................... 102 97 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 109* 112* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 107* 96 Springfield, MA....................... 97 105* Springfield, MO....................... 90* 86* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 100 99 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87* 76* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93* 93* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 95* 86* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 106* 101 York, PA.............................. 97* 104* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 95* 86* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 121* Springfield, MA....................... 112* 108* Springfield, MO....................... 92* 87* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 96* 96 Tallahassee, FL....................... 88* 89* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 90* 91* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 98* 100 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 109* 107* York, PA.............................. 99 99* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 94* 87* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 108* 108* Springfield, MA....................... 108* 112* Springfield, MO....................... 89* 87* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 98 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 92* 88* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 89* 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 90* 95* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 112* York, PA.............................. 94* 95* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 97* 87* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 113* 105 Springfield, MA....................... 110* 108* Springfield, MO....................... 85* 96* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 117* 101 Tallahassee, FL....................... 90* 85* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 96 94* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 92* 94* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 102 111* York, PA.............................. 93* 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 96* 96* See footnotes at end of table. TABLE 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 112* 106* Springfield, MA....................... 116* 73* Springfield, MO....................... 95* 92* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 102 112* Tallahassee, FL....................... 90* 105* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 92* 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 99 95* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 113* 99 York, PA.............................. 92* 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 103* 110* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the national average of all areas at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.