Employee Tenure Summary

Technical information:(202) 691-6378      USDL 08-1344
             http://www.bls.gov/cps/
                                          For release:  10:00 A.M. (EDT)
Media contact:        (202) 691-5902      Friday, September 26, 2008
                                   
                                   
                        EMPLOYEE TENURE IN 2008

   The median number of years that wage and salary workers had been 
with their current employer was 4.1 years in January 2008, little 
changed from 4.0 years in January 2006, the Bureau of Labor Statistics 
of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today.

   Information on employee tenure has been obtained from supplemental
questions to the Current Population Survey (CPS) every 2 years since
1996.  The CPS is a monthly survey of about 60,000 households that
provides information on the labor force status, demographics, and
other characteristics of the civilian noninstitutional population age
16 and over.  The questions about employee tenure measure how long
workers had been with their current employer at the time of the sur-
vey.  A number of factors can affect the median tenure of workers,
including changes in the age profile among workers as well as changes
in the number of hires and separations.  (See the Technical Note.)

Demographic Characteristics

   In January 2008, median tenure (the point at which half of all
workers had more tenure and half had less tenure) for men was 4.2
years, about unchanged from January 2006.  For women, median tenure 
in January 2008 was 3.9 years, unchanged from January 2006.  (See  
table 1.) 

   Older workers tend to have more years of tenure than their younger
counterparts.  For example, median tenure for employees age 55 to 64
was 9.9 years in January 2008, almost four times the tenure (2.7 years) 
for workers age 25 to 34.  (See table 1.)

   The percentage of all wage and salary workers age 16 and over with
10 or more years of tenure with their current employer was 27 percent
in January 2008.  Among men, 28 percent had at least 10 years of ten-
ure with their current employer in January 2008, higher than the 26
percent among women.  A larger percentage of older workers than younger 
workers had 10 or more years of tenure. More than half of all workers 
age 55 and over were employed for at least 10 years with their current 
employer in January 2008, compared with only 10 percent of those age 30 
to 34.  (See tables 2 and 3.)

   The proportion of Hispanic wage and salary workers (age 16 and 
over) with 10 or more years of tenure with their current employer was
19 percent in January 2008, compared with 28 percent of white, 24 per-
cent of black, and 21 percent of Asian workers.  (See table 3.)  The 
shorter tenure among Hispanics can be explained, in part, by their re-
lative youth.  Nearly 50 percent of Hispanic workers age 16 and over
were between the ages of 16 to 34.  In contrast, less than 40 percent
of whites, blacks, and Asians were between 16 and 34 years old.

                             - 2 -

   In January 2008, about 23 percent of all wage and salary workers
age 16 and over had 12 months or less of tenure with their current
employer.  These short-tenured workers include new entrants and
reentrants to the labor force, job losers who found new jobs during
the previous year, and workers who had voluntarily changed employers
during the previous year.  Younger workers are more likely than older 
workers to be short-tenured employees.  For example, among 20- to 24-
year-old workers, about half had a year or less of tenure with their 
current employer.  Among wage and salary workers age 55 to 64 and 
those age 65 and over, less than 10 percent had a year or less of ten-
ure.  (See table 3.)

Industry

   In January 2008, wage and salary workers in the public sector had
double the median tenure of private sector employees, 7.2 versus 3.6
years.  The longer tenure among workers in the public sector is ex-
plained, in part, by a higher share of workers age 35 and over among
government workers than in the private sector.  About 3 in 4 govern-
ment workers were age 35 and over, compared with about 3 out of 5 pri-
vate wage and salary workers.  Federal employees had a higher median 
tenure (9.9 years) than state (6.5 years) or local government (7.1 
years) employees.  (See table 5.)

   Within the private sector, workers in manufacturing had the highest
median tenure among the major industries (5.9 years).  In contrast,
workers in leisure and hospitality had the lowest median tenure (2.1
years).  These differences in tenure reflect many factors, one of
which is varying age distributions across industries; workers in manu-
facturing tend to be older on average than workers in leisure and hos-
pitality.  (See table 5.)

Occupation

   Among the major occupations, workers in management, professional,
and related occupations had the highest median tenure (5.1 years) in
January 2008.  Within this group, employees with jobs in architecture
and engineering occupations (6.4 years) and management occupations
(6.0 years) had the longest tenure.  Workers in service occupations,
who are generally younger than persons employed in management, profes-
sional, and related occupations, had the lowest median tenure (2.8 
years).  Among employees working in service jobs, food service workers 
had the shortest median tenure, at 2.0 years.  (See table 6.)





     ----------------------------------------------------------- 
    |                                                           |
    |      Imputed Data for Older Veterans and Young Workers    |
    |                                                           |
    |   Due to a programming error in the January 2008 survey   |
    | instrument, employee tenure information was not obtained  |
    | from respondents who were 16 years old and from those who |
    | were veterans age 65 and over.  Missing data for these    |
    | individuals were imputed using information collected from |
    | respondents who were 16 years old and veterans age 65 and |
    | over in the January 2006 supplement.  This imputation had |
    | minimal effect on the overall estimates because of the    |
    | similar employment characteristics of these two groups in |
    | January 2006 and January 2008.                            |
    |                                                           |
     ----------------------------------------------------------- 





The PDF version of the news release

Table of Contents

Last Modified Date: September 26, 2008