In
1999, after great controversy, the National Park Service (NPS) created
America’s largest temperate marine reserve by closing commercial fishing
in parts of Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. During the 1990's, collapsing
fisheries around the world caused doubt about the long-term sustainability
of certain fisheries. Alaskan crustacean fisheries are particularly prone to
serial depletion and collapse. An emerging theoretical and empirical body of
information hypothesizes that "no-take marine reserves" may
promote marine biodiversity, increase scientific understanding and enhance
the long-term sustainability of many fisheries.
In order to be effective, a marine reserve must be large enough to
protect a sufficient proportion of the population for positive effects such
as increased size, density, or fecundity to be realized. In addition, an
effective reserve must include relevant habitat for the protected species.
In practice, however, reserve areas are often chosen pragmatically, on very
limited information, and many reserves are created with no monitoring or
evaluation procedures. Monitoring reserves to determine if they meet their
objectives is essential and the Executive Order 13518 on Marine Protected
Areas (MPAs) (May 26, 2000) calls for the development of "practical,
science-based criteria and protocols for monitoring and evaluating the
effectiveness of MPAs." This executive order also directs the
Department of Interior and the Department of Commerce to take a
collaborative regional approach while developing a National Network of
Marine Protected Areas. The regional nature of many marine processes will
require developing management and research collaborations across
jurisdictional boundaries if marine resource issues are going to be solved.
Although
theoretical concepts and simulation models are rapidly developing for marine
reserves, their effectiveness at protecting breeding adults has been
demonstrated primarily in tropical areas. Beneficial effects on areas
surrounding reserves have been demonstrated in only a few studies and data
on the effectiveness of marine reserves are especially limited from high
latitude ecosystems. High latitude reserves may be less effective than
tropical reserves because temperate fish have broader movement patterns than
coral reef fish. Thus to be effective, temperate reserves may have to be
much larger.
Marine reserve models demonstrate that understanding movement is central
to evaluating reserve effectiveness. We will estimate the relative density
and relative abundance of Pacific halibut, Tanner crab, and red king crab
inside and outside of the newly created reserves in Glacier Bay. Next we
will attach sonic tags to a sample of Pacific halibut, Tanner crab,
and red king crab, and estimate the movement between the newly created
reserves in Glacier Bay and central portion of Glacier Bay (which
remained
open to commercial fishing), by deploying an ultrasonic gate along the
boundary of each reserve for two years. Movement between the entire Bay and
Icy Strait will be measured with an ultrasonic gate deployed near the mouth
of Glacier Bay. The ultrasonic gates will be constructed by anchoring data
loggers along the boundaries at regular intervals so that 100% of the
boundary is monitored. This study will allow us to quantify the
effectiveness of the reserves at protecting the adult breeding portion of
the selected populations. It will also set the stage for future studies,
which will address the effect of the reserves on larval supply and the role
of reserves as ecological sources vs. sinks. The quantitative testing that
we are proposing will help managers, scientists and the public to evaluate
the utility of reserves as a management tool in the conservation of local
and regional marine resources in Alaska.
Entire Study Plan (PDF version) - [1.9
MB]