Internet: www.bls.gov/ro3/ | PLS - FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2008 |
|
INFORMATION: | Gerald Perrins (215) 597-3282 |
|
MEDIA CONTACT: | Sheila Watkins (215) 861-5600 |
|
County Employment and Wages in Pennsylvania:  First Quarter 2008 (PDF)Westmoreland County recorded fastest wage growth in the United StatesIn the first quarter of 2008, the average weekly wage in Westmoreland County increased by 14.9 percent over the year, the largest advance among all U.S. counties with employment of 75,000 or more, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor. Butler County’s 6.1-percent wage growth was the second fastest among Pennsylvania’s 19 large counties and ranked 14th in the nation. Montgomery County had the highest average weekly wage level in the Commonwealth, $1,189, followed by Chester County ($1,118) and Philadelphia County ($1,064). Sheila Watkins, the Bureau’s regional commissioner, noted that among Pennsylvania’s 19 large counties, 8 recorded wage growth above the national rate of 2.4 percent, and 5 had wages above the nationwide average of $905. (See table 1.) Pennsylvania’s counties had some of the highest average weekly wages in the country. Montgomery County ranked 21st; Chester County, 36th; and Philadelphia County, 44th when wages were compared for all 334 large counties nationwide. Several counties in Pennsylvania also registered some of the largest over-the-year wage gains in the nation in the first quarter of 2008.  In addition to Westmoreland (1st) and Butler (14th) counties, two other Pennsylvania counties ranked in the top one-fourth nationwide—Northampton and Delaware, at 70th and 80th, respectively.  Delaware was the only county in the Commonwealth to rank in the top one-fourth of large counties nationwide in both wage levels and wage growth. In Pennsylvania, Allegheny County (which includes Pittsburgh) registered the highest level of employment in March 2008 at 677,163, closely followed by Philadelphia County at 630,752. After these two urban counties, Montgomery County had the third-highest level of employment at 486,272.  Chester County had the highest percent growth in employment—2.0 percent—which was five times the national average of 0.4 percent. Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 48 counties in Pennsylvania with employment below 75,000. Of these counties, Montour was the only one with an average weekly wage ($909) above the national average. (See table 2 and chart 1.) Large County Average Weekly WagesAmong Pennsylvania’s 19 large counties, 5 had average weekly wages exceeding $900 in the first quarter of 2008─Montgomery, Chester, Philadelphia, Delaware, and Allegheny. All five of these large counties, four of which were located in the Philadelphia, Pa. metropolitan area, recorded wage levels greater than the nationwide average of $905 and ranked in the top one-fourth nationally. The average weekly wage in the top-paying county of Montgomery was 31 percent above the national level. At the other end of the wage spectrum, Lackawanna County ($645) reported the lowest average weekly wage level in the Commonwealth, followed by the counties of Luzerne ($674), Erie ($683), Lancaster ($729), and Butler ($750). These five counties, two of which were located in the Scranton—Wilkes-Barre, Pa. metropolitan area, ranked in the bottom one-third nationwide. New York, N.Y., held the top position among the highest-paid large counties with an average weekly wage of $2,805. Fairfield, Conn., was second with an average weekly wage of $1,905, followed by Somerset, N.J. ($1,765), Suffolk, Mass. ($1,708), and San Francisco, Calif. ($1,639). Of the 10 counties with the highest wages in the United States, 4 were located in the greater New York metropolitan area (New York, N.Y., Fairfield, Conn., Somerset, N.J., and Hudson, N.J.), 3 others were located in or around the San Francisco area (San Francisco, Santa Clara, and San Mateo, all in California), and 2 more were located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area (Washington, D.C., and Arlington, Va.).  Rounding out the top 10 was Suffolk County, Mass., part of the Boston metropolitan area.  The lowest average weekly wage was reported in Cameron County, Texas ($523), followed by the counties of Hidalgo, Texas ($532), Horry, S.C. ($534), Webb, Texas ($554), and Yakima, Wash. ($587). Large County Wage ChangesOf Pennsylvania’s 19 large counties, 8 recorded wage growth above the national increase of 2.4 percent from the first quarter of 2007 to the first quarter of 2008. After Westmoreland County’s 14.9-percent wage growth was Butler County’s 6.1-percent gain, which ranked 14th in the nation. The other six counties with higher-than-average wage growth were Northampton (3.9 percent/70th), Delaware (3.7 percent/80th), Washington (3.5 percent/97th), York (3.3 percent/112th), Lancaster (2.8 percent/151st), and Philadelphia (2.6 percent/163rd). Four of the eight counties registered wage gains that were among the highest one-fourth of large counties in the United States. Luzerne County was the only county in Pennsylvania to record a decline (-0.7 percent) in average weekly wages, ranking it 308th in the nation.  Chester County, at 0.3 percent (283rd), reported the lowest percentage increase in average weekly wages in the Commonwealth in the first quarter of 2008, followed by the counties of Allegheny (0.5 percent/276th), Lehigh (0.7 percent/267th), and Montgomery (1.0 percent/253rd). These five counties ranked in the bottom one-fourth in wage growth nationwide. As noted earlier, Westmoreland, Pa., led the nation in average weekly wage growth, with an increase of 14.9 percent from the first quarter of 2007.  Williamson, Texas, was second at 10.8 percent, followed by the counties of Somerset, N.J. (9.0 percent), San Luis Obispo, Calif. (8.3 percent), and Jefferson, Texas (7.9 percent). Thirty-four large counties experienced over-the-year declines in average weekly wages. Trumbull, Ohio, had the largest decrease (-17.2 percent), followed by the counties of Saginaw, Mich. (-4.4 percent), Rockingham, N.H. (-3.9 percent), Fairfield, Conn. (-3.8 percent), and Mecklenburg, N.C. (-3.4 percent). Wage Levels in Pennsylvania’s Smaller CountiesAs mentioned, all but 1 of the 48 counties in Pennsylvania with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages below the national level. Susquehanna County reported the lowest wage level among Pennsylvania’s 48 small counties, at $479. The highest wage among these small counties was Montour County’s $909, followed by Greene County’s $852. Five of the Commonwealth’s 19 large counties recorded higher wage levels than Montour County, but none recorded lower wages than Susquehanna County. When all 67 counties in Pennsylvania are considered, just two— Susquehanna and Sullivan—had wages below $500. Both of these two counties were located in the northeastern part of the Commonwealth. Three other counties—Montgomery, Chester, and Philadelphia—had wages above $1,000. All three of these counties were located in the Philadelphia metropolitan area, in the southeastern part of the Commonwealth. Forty-three, or nearly two-thirds, of the counties in Pennsylvania reported average weekly wages from $501 to $700 in the first quarter of 2008. (See chart 1.) State Average Weekly WagesThe average weekly wage in Pennsylvania was $869, $36 below the nationwide level, ranking 15th highest among the 50 states and the District of Columbia. (See table 3.) Nationally, 8 of the 12 areas with above-average weekly wage levels were located in a contiguous band along the east coast, stretching from Massachusetts to Virginia. The five highest average wages were in the District of Columbia ($1,488), New York ($1,399), Connecticut ($1,254), Massachusetts ($1,143), and New Jersey ($1,133). Average weekly wages in this group were 25 percent or more above that for the nation. At the other end of the scale, seven states had wage levels 75 percent or less of national earnings:  Montana ($625), South Dakota ($632), Mississippi ($634), Idaho ($635), North Dakota ($652), Arkansas ($667), and West Virginia ($679). Wyoming experienced wage growth of 6.7 percent from the first quarter of 2007 to the first quarter of 2008, higher than any other state. North Dakota was second with 6.2-percent growth, followed by South Dakota at 5.2 percent.  One state, Connecticut, experienced an over-the-year decline (-0.6 percent). Two other states, Delaware and New York, remained virtually unchanged, each up 0.1 percent. Pennsylvania’s average wage growth equaled the nation’s 2.4-percent advance. Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs).   The 9.1 million employer reports cover 134.8 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or States for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised (see Note below) and will not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site. Additional statistics and other informationAn annual bulletin, Employment and Wages, features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2006 edition of this bulletin contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2007 version of this news release. As with the 2005 edition, this edition includes the data on a CD for enhanced access and usability with the printed booklet containing selected graphic representations of QCEW data; the data tables themselves have been published exclusively in electronic formats as PDFs. Employment and Wages Annual Averages, 2006 is available in a PDF on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn06.htm. Also, the quarterly press release, County Employment and Wages, presents employment and wage data for the largest counties in the U.S. and is available at www.bls.gov/cew/. Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone number: 1-800-877-8339. For personal assistance or further information on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Program, as well as other Bureau programs, contact the Mid-Atlantic Information Office at 215-597-3282 from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. ET. QCEW-based news releases issued by other regional offices have been placed at one convenient Web site location, www.bls.gov/cew/cewregional.htm. Technical NoteQCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons--some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes. The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases. |
Area | Employment | Average Weekly Wage(3) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 2008 (thousands) | Percent change, March 2007-08(5) |
Average weekly wage | National ranking by level(4) | Percent change, first quarter 2007-08(5) |
National ranking by percent change(4) | |
United States(6) |
134,761.1 | 0.4 | $905 | -- | 2.4 | -- |
Pennsylvania |
5,608.8 | 0.5 | 869 | 15 | 2.4 | 34 |
Allegheny, Pa. |
677.2 | 0.3 | 952 | 69 | 0.5 | 276 |
Berks, Pa. |
167.9 | 0.2 | 770 | 198 | 2.4 | 184 |
Bucks, Pa. |
262.0 | 0.5 | 849 | 131 | 2.3 | 192 |
Butler, Pa. |
78.8 | 0.8 | 750 | 223 | 6.1 | 14 |
Chester, Pa. |
241.7 | 2.0 | 1,118 | 36 | 0.3 | 283 |
Cumberland, Pa. |
125.1 | 0.3 | 794 | 177 | 2.3 | 192 |
Dauphin, Pa. |
180.0 | 0.1 | 842 | 135 | 1.4 | 233 |
Delaware, Pa. |
209.1 | 0.6 | 959 | 65 | 3.7 | 80 |
Erie, Pa. |
125.4 | -1.1 | 683 | 291 | 2.4 | 184 |
Lackawanna, Pa. |
100.4 | -0.9 | 645 | 315 | 2.4 | 184 |
Lancaster, Pa. |
227.3 | 0.7 | 729 | 252 | 2.8 | 151 |
Lehigh, Pa. |
176.4 | 0.2 | 872 | 116 | 0.7 | 267 |
Luzerne, Pa. |
140.2 | 0.0 | 674 | 301 | -0.7 | 308 |
Montgomery, Pa. |
486.3 | 1.0 | 1,189 | 21 | 1.0 | 253 |
Northampton, Pa. |
99.2 | 0.8 | 772 | 195 | 3.9 | 70 |
Philadelphia, Pa. |
630.8 | -0.3 | 1,064 | 44 | 2.6 | 163 |
Washington, Pa. |
78.1 | 1.2 | 762 | 208 | 3.5 | 97 |
Westmoreland, Pa. |
133.6 | -0.5 | 757 | 214 | 14.9 | 1 |
York, Pa. |
176.3 | 0.6 | 759 | 211 | 3.3 | 112 |
Footnotes: |
Area | Employment March 2008 (thousands) | Average weekly wage(3) |
---|---|---|
United States(4) |
134,761.1 | $905 |
Pennsylvania |
5,608.8 | 869 |
Adams |
34.6 | 633 |
Allegheny |
677.2 | 952 |
Armstrong |
18.3 | 686 |
Beaver |
56.1 | 718 |
Bedford |
15.5 | 545 |
Berks |
167.9 | 770 |
Blair |
58.9 | 621 |
Bradford |
21.1 | 684 |
Bucks |
262.0 | 849 |
Butler |
78.8 | 750 |
Cambria |
58.5 | 603 |
Cameron |
2.5 | 579 |
Carbon |
16.8 | 550 |
Centre |
65.4 | 723 |
Chester |
241.7 | 1,118 |
Clarion |
14.5 | 566 |
Clearfield |
30.6 | 592 |
Clinton |
12.8 | 597 |
Columbia |
25.0 | 623 |
Crawford |
31.0 | 621 |
Cumberland |
125.1 | 794 |
Dauphin |
180.0 | 842 |
Delaware |
209.1 | 959 |
Elk |
15.4 | 639 |
Erie |
125.4 | 683 |
Fayette |
41.9 | 575 |
Forest |
2.3 | 628 |
Franklin |
58.2 | 659 |
Fulton |
5.2 | 694 |
Greene |
12.7 | 852 |
Huntingdon |
13.2 | 601 |
Indiana |
32.8 | 706 |
Jefferson |
16.2 | 593 |
Juniata |
6.3 | 533 |
Lackawanna |
100.4 | 645 |
Lancaster |
227.3 | 729 |
Lawrence |
30.1 | 656 |
Lebanon |
47.6 | 637 |
Lehigh |
176.4 | 872 |
Luzerne |
140.2 | 674 |
Lycoming |
51.9 | 637 |
Mc Kean |
17.3 | 654 |
Mercer |
48.5 | 636 |
Mifflin |
15.5 | 589 |
Monroe |
58.6 | 707 |
Montgomery |
486.3 | 1,189 |
Montour |
14.3 | 909 |
Northampton |
99.2 | 772 |
Northumberland |
29.8 | 622 |
Perry |
8.0 | 505 |
Philadelphia |
630.8 | 1,064 |
Pike |
10.5 | 544 |
Potter |
5.4 | 655 |
Schuylkill |
51.9 | 617 |
Snyder |
15.9 | 574 |
Somerset |
25.7 | 583 |
Sullivan |
1.5 | 488 |
Susquehanna |
8.9 | 479 |
Tioga |
12.5 | 579 |
Union |
16.4 | 656 |
Venango |
20.3 | 625 |
Warren |
14.9 | 651 |
Washington |
78.1 | 762 |
Wayne |
14.9 | 584 |
Westmoreland |
133.6 | 757 |
Wyoming |
9.3 | 700 |
York |
176.3 | 759 |
Footnotes: |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (3) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 2008 (thousands) | Percent change, March 2007-08 |
Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, first quarter 2006-07 |
National ranking by percent change | |
United States(4) |
134,761.1 | 0.4 | $905 | - | 2.4 | - |
Alabama |
1,947.0 | -0.2 | 740 | 34 | 3.2 | 27 |
Alaska |
303.0 | 1.0 | 866 | 16 | 4.2 | 11 |
Arizona |
2,639.7 | -1.3 | 820 | 22 | 2.4 | 34 |
Arkansas |
1,178.4 | -0.1 | 667 | 46 | 4.1 | 12 |
California |
15,561.5 | 0.1 | 1008 | 6 | 2.1 | 41 |
Colorado |
2,300.0 | 1.7 | 920 | 10 | 3.6 | 16 |
Connecticut |
1,683.9 | 1.2 | 1254 | 3 | -0.6 | 51 |
Delaware |
418.4 | 0.5 | 987 | 7 | 0.1 | 49 |
District of Columbia |
680.8 | 1.1 | 1488 | 1 | 4.3 | 9 |
Florida |
7,918.6 | -2.2 | 777 | 26 | 1.8 | 43 |
Georgia |
4,060.9 | 0.1 | 847 | 20 | 1.3 | 44 |
Hawaii |
628.1 | 0.2 | 773 | 28 | 3.5 | 19 |
Idaho |
645.3 | 0.2 | 635 | 48 | 0.3 | 48 |
Illinois |
5,796.1 | 0.1 | 980 | 8 | 2.6 | 33 |
Indiana |
2,858.7 | -0.7 | 757 | 33 | 2.4 | 34 |
Iowa |
1,469.8 | 0.9 | 710 | 40 | 3.6 | 16 |
Kansas |
1,363.2 | 1.0 | 737 | 35 | 2.4 | 34 |
Kentucky |
1,794.0 | 0.1 | 714 | 39 | 2.4 | 34 |
Louisiana |
1,887.3 | 1.3 | 765 | 30 | 4.8 | 4 |
Maine |
584.1 | 0.5 | 701 | 42 | 3.5 | 19 |
Maryland |
2,530.3 | 0.0 | 963 | 9 | 2.8 | 31 |
Massachusetts |
3,203.1 | 0.9 | 1143 | 4 | 3.3 | 23 |
Michigan |
4,058.8 | -1.8 | 857 | 18 | 0.9 | 47 |
Minnesota |
2,644.8 | 0.6 | 908 | 12 | 4.0 | 13 |
Mississippi |
1,138.2 | 0.8 | 634 | 49 | 3.3 | 23 |
Missouri |
2,708.0 | 0.0 | 768 | 29 | 3.5 | 19 |
Montana |
432.4 | 0.9 | 625 | 51 | 4.3 | 9 |
Nebraska |
912.2 | 1.4 | 687 | 44 | 3.2 | 27 |
Nevada |
1,266.3 | -1.2 | 839 | 21 | 4.7 | 5 |
New Hampshire |
621.2 | 0.3 | 863 | 17 | 3.4 | 22 |
New Jersey |
3,939.9 | 0.5 | 1133 | 5 | 3.3 | 23 |
New Mexico |
823.8 | 0.6 | 717 | 38 | 4.7 | 5 |
New York |
8,555.0 | 1.3 | 1399 | 2 | 0.1 | 49 |
North Carolina |
4,069.1 | 0.9 | 788 | 24 | 1.3 | 44 |
North Dakota |
343.3 | 2.6 | 652 | 47 | 6.2 | 2 |
Ohio |
5,189.1 | -1.0 | 798 | 23 | 1.0 | 46 |
Oklahoma |
1,560.0 | 1.6 | 707 | 41 | 4.7 | 5 |
Oregon |
1,713.1 | 0.3 | 776 | 27 | 2.9 | 30 |
Pennsylvania |
5,608.8 | 0.5 | 869 | 15 | 2.4 | 34 |
Rhode Island |
464.8 | -1.5 | 851 | 19 | 2.3 | 39 |
South Carolina |
1,888.3 | 0.1 | 695 | 43 | 2.8 | 31 |
South Dakota |
389.4 | 2.0 | 632 | 50 | 5.2 | 3 |
Tennessee |
2,746.4 | 0.6 | 761 | 31 | 3.3 | 23 |
Texas |
10,420.8 | 2.8 | 903 | 13 | 3.6 | 16 |
Utah |
1,220.2 | 1.4 | 718 | 37 | 3.2 | 27 |
Vermont |
300.8 | -0.3 | 735 | 36 | 4.4 | 8 |
Virginia |
3,653.5 | 0.2 | 918 | 11 | 2.0 | 42 |
Washington |
2,928.6 | 2.1 | 899 | 14 | 3.7 | 15 |
West Virginia |
700.3 | 0.3 | 679 | 45 | 4.0 | 13 |
Wisconsin |
2,734.3 | 0.2 | 760 | 32 | 2.2 | 40 |
Wyoming |
277.2 | 2.9 | 779 | 25 | 6.7 | 1 |
Puerto Rico |
1,004.5 | -1.6 | 489 | (5) | 2.7 | (5) |
Virgin Islands |
46.5 | 1.1 | 708 | (5) | 3.4 | (5) |
Footnotes: |
Chart 1. Â Average weekly wages by county in Pennsylvania, first quarter 2008
Last Modified Date: November 24, 2008