FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:                                                                      FOR RELEASE:
Cheryl Abbot, Regional Economist                                                              February 24, 2009    
(214) 767-6970                                                   
http://www.bls.gov/ro6/
			

                   CHANGING COMPENSATION COSTS IN THE DALLAS METROPOLITAN AREA: DECEMBER 2008

     Total compensation costs for private industry workers increased 2.6 percent in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas 
metropolitan area for the year ended in December 2008, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor.  Regional Commissioner Stanley W. Suchman noted that this gain matched the annual compensation 
increase experienced a year ago.  Locally, wages and salaries, the largest component of total compensation costs, 
advanced at a 3.2-percent pace for the 12-month period ended December 2008.  Nationwide, total compensation costs 
rose 2.4 percent and wages and salaries, 2.6 percent over the same period.  (See chart A and table 1.)


Chart A.  Twelve-month percent changes in the Employment Cost Index for total compensation and for wages
and salaries, private industry workers, United States and the Dallas area, not seasonally adjusted,
December 2006 to December 2008

	  		

     Dallas is 1 of 14 metropolitan areas in the United States, and 1 of 5 areas in the South region of the country, 
for which local compensation cost data are available.  Among these 14 largest areas, both Boston and Philadelphia 
experienced the highest percent change in total compensation costs from December 2007 to December 2008; Boston 
registered the largest gain in wages and salaries.  Over-the-year growth in the total compensation costs ranged from 
4.0 percent in Boston and Philadelphia to 1.7 percent in Detroit in December 2008; for wages and salaries, annual 
advances ranged from 4.5 percent in Boston to 1.8 percent in New York.  (See chart B.)

     The 2.6-percent annual increase in total compensation costs in Dallas in December 2008 was similar to the gain 
of 2.5 percent in Houston.  In the three other areas in the South, annual compensation increases were 3.1 percent in 
Washington and 2.1 percent in Atlanta and Miami.  Wages and salaries rose 3.2 percent in Dallas and 3.0 percent in 
both Houston and Washington over this same 12-month period.  Miami saw the highest wage and salary gain at 4.0 
percent in December 2008, while Atlanta experienced the lowest at 2.1 percent.  (See table 2.)

     Local compensation costs are part of the national Employment Cost Index (ECI) which measures quarterly changes 
in total compensation costs, including wages, salaries, and employer costs for employee benefits.  In addition to 
the 14 local estimates provided in this release, ECI data for the nation, 4 geographical regions, and 9 geographical 
divisions are available.  (Geographical definitions for the metropolitan areas mentioned in this release are 
included in the Technical Note.) 


Chart B.  Percent change in the Employment Cost Index for total compensation and for wages and salaries, private 
industry workers, United States and localities, not seasonally adjusted, December 2007 to December 2008

	


     In addition to the geographic data, a comprehensive national report is available that provides data by 
industry, occupational group, and union status, as well as for both private and state and local government 
employees.  The report on the Employment Cost Index and further technical information may be obtained from the U.S. 
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Southwest Regional Office by calling 214-767-6970.  The report is also available on the 
Internet at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/eci.toc.htm.  Current and historical information from other Bureau 
programs may be accessed via our regional homepage at www.bls.gov/ro6/.  The ECI for March 2009 will be released on 
Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 8:30 a.m. (ET).  Information from the Employment Cost Index program is available to 
sensory impaired individuals upon request.  Voice phone:  202-691-5200, Federal Relay Services:  1-800-877-8339.  

 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|                                                                                                                |
|      The "Employment Cost Index for the Regions" news releases have been discontinued.  However, the estimates |
| that appeared in those releases are available in table 6 (www.bls.gov/news.release/eci.t06.htm) and table 10   |
| (www.bls.gov/news.release/eci.t10.htm) of the "Employment Cost Index" news release issued by the BLS National  |
|  Office.  Historical estimates can be retrieved at www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/regionaleci.htm.                        |
|________________________________________________________________________________________________________________|



                                                 Technical Note

      The Employment Cost Index (ECI) is a measure of the change in the cost of labor, free from the influence of 
employment shifts among occupations and industries.  The total compensation series includes changes in wages and 
salaries and employer costs for employee benefits.

     Wages and salaries are defined as straight-time average hourly earnings or, for workers not paid on an hourly 
basis, straight-time earnings divided by the corresponding hours.  Straight-time wage and salary rates are total 
earnings before payroll deductions, excluding premium pay for overtime, work on weekends and holidays, and shift 
differentials.  Production bonuses, incentive earnings, commission payments, and cost-of-living adjustments are 
included in straight-time earnings, whereas nonproduction bonuses (such as Christmas or year-end bonuses) are 
excluded.  Also excluded are such items as payments-in-kind, free room and board, and tips.

                                               Selection of areas

     Based on available resources and the existing ECI sample, it was determined that estimates would be published 
for 14 metropolitan areas.  Since the ECI sample sizes by area are directly related to area employment, the areas 
with the largest private industry employment as of the year 2000 were selected.  For each of these areas, 12-month 
percent changes and associated standard areas were computed for the periods since December 2006.

The metropolitan area definitions of the 14 published localities are listed below.

     Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, Ga.-Ala. Combined Statistical Area (CSA) includes Barrow, Bartow, Butts, Carroll, 
Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, Dawson, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Haralson, 
Heard, Henry, Jasper, Lamar, Meriwether, Newton, Paulding, Pickens, Pike, Polk, Rockdale, Spalding, Troup, Upson, 
and Walton Counties in Georgia; and Chambers County in Alabama.

     Boston-Worcester-Manchester, Mass.-N.H. CSA includes Essex, Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, and Worcester 
Counties in Massachusetts and Belknap, Hillsborough, Merrimack, Rockingham, and Strafford Counties in New Hampshire.

     Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, Ill.-Ind.-Wis. CSA includes Cook, DeKalb, DuPage, Grundy, Kane, Kankakee, Kendall, 
Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties in Illinois; Jasper, Lake, LaPorte, Newton, and Porter Counties in Indiana; and 
Kenosha County in Wisconsin.

     Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas CSA includes Collin, Cooke, Dallas, Delta, Denton, Ellis, Henderson, Hood, Hunt, Johnson, 
Kaufman, Palo Pinto, Parker, Rockwall, Somervell, Tarrant, and Wise Counties in Texas.

     Detroit-Warren-Flint, Mich. CSA includes Genesee, Lapeer, Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, 
and Wayne Counties in Michigan.

     Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, Texas CSA includes Austin, Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, 
Matagorda, Montgomery, San Jacinto, Walker, and Waller Counties in Texas.

     Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, Calif. CSA includes Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura 
Counties in California.

     Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, Fla. Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) includes Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm 
Beach Counties in Florida.

     Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, Minn.-Wis. CSA includes Anoka, Benton, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Goodhue, Hennepin, 
Isanti, McLeod, Ramsey, Rice, Scott, Sherburne, Stearns, Washington, and Wright Counties in Minnesota; and Pierce 
and St. Croix Counties in Wisconsin.

     New York-Newark-Bridgeport, N.Y.-N.J.-Conn.-Pa. CSA includes Bronx, Dutchess, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, 
Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk, Ulster, and Westchester Counties in New York; Bergen, Essex, Hudson, 
Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex, and Union Counties in New 
Jersey; Fairfield, Litchfield, and New Haven Counties in Connecticut; and Pike County in Pennsylvania.

     Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md. CSA includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia 
Counties in Pennsylvania; Burlington, Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties in New Jersey; New Castle 
County in Delaware; and Cecil County in Maryland.

     Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz. MSA includes Maricopa and Pinal Counties in Arizona.

     San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, Calif. CSA includes Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Benito,  
San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Sonoma, and Solano Counties in California.

     Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, D.C.-Md.-Va.-W.Va. CSA includes the District of Columbia; Baltimore City 
and Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Calvert, Carroll, Charles, Frederick, Harford, Howard, Montgomery, Prince George’s, 
Queen Anne’s, and St. Mary’s Counties in Maryland; Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Fredericksburg, Manassas, 
Manassas Park, and Winchester Cities and Arlington, Clarke, Fairfax, Fauquier, Frederick, Loudoun, Prince 
William, Spotsylvania, Stafford, and Warren Counties in Virginia; and Hampshire and Jefferson Counties in West 
Virginia.

Last Modified Date: February 24, 2009