CONTACT:
Media Interviews (415) 625-2270
Internet address: http://www.bls.gov/ro9/news.htm

BLS 08-103
FOR RELEASE:
Thursday, December 18, 2008

COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES IN IDAHO
FIRST QUARTER 2008

The average weekly wage in Ada County was $746 in the first quarter of 2008, 2.4 percent lower than it was one year earlier, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor. Regional Commissioner Richard J. Holden noted that the wage in Ada County was $159 below the national average of $905 which had increased at a 2.4-percent pace over-the-year. (See table 1.)

Ada was the only large county in Idaho-that is, it had 75,000 or more jobs as measured by 2007 annual average employment. Ada Countys average wage ranked in the bottom one-third at 229th among the 334 largest counties in the United States. With an over-the-year decline in wages from the first quarter of 2007, Ada was close to the bottom in the national ranking at 321st.

In March 2008, employment in Ada County totaled 209,200 and represented slightly more than 32 percent of the States employment. From March 2007 to March 2008, employment in the county decreased 0.5 percent. Nationwide, employment grew 0.4 percent over the same period. Of the 334 largest counties, 146 had over-the-year percentage growth in employment above the national average in March 2008; 178 large counties experienced changes below the national average.

Large County Average Weekly Wages

Across the country, average weekly wages were higher than that for the nation in 92 of the largest 334 counties. New York County, N.Y., held the top position with an average weekly wage of $2,805. Fairfield, Conn., was second with an average wage of $1,905, followed by Somerset, N.J. ($1765), Suffolk, Mass. ($1,708), and San Francisco, Calif. ($1,639).

There were 241 large counties with an average weekly wage at or below the national average in the first quarter of 2008. The lowest average weekly wage was reported in Cameron County, Texas ($523), followed by the counties of Hidalgo, Texas ($532), Horry, S.C. ($534), Webb County, Texas ($554), Yakima, Wash. ($587), and Pasco, Florida ($594).

Large County Wage Changes

Westmoreland, Pa., led the nation in wage growth with an annual increase of 14.9 percent from the first quarter of 2007. Williamson, Texas, was second with a 10.8-percent gain, followed by Somerset, N.J. (9.0 percent), San Luis Obispo, Calif. (8.3 percent), and Jefferson, Texas (7.9 percent).

Thirty-four large counties, including Ada, experienced over-the-year declines in average weekly wages. Trumbull, Ohio, had the largest decrease (-17.2 percent), followed by the counties of Saginaw, Mich. (-4.4 percent), Rockingham, N.H. (-3.9 percent), Fairchild, Conn. (-3.8 percent), and Mecklenburg, N.C. (-3.4 percent).

Employment and Wages in Idaho's Smaller Counties

Employment and wages (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 43 small counties in Idaho, those with employment below 75,000. These counties accounted for close to 68 percent of statewide employment.

Among the small counties, Canyon reported the highest employment at 55,097, followed by Kootenai, 54,505. Camas County had the lowest employment-422. (See table 2.)

Butte County ($1,372) had the highest average weekly wage in the State and surpassed the national average by $467. The next highest wages among Idahos smaller counties were recorded in Caribou County ($826) and Clark County ($740). Boise County reported the lowest average wage at $355.

When all 44 counties in Idaho were considered, 13 had average weekly wages below $500, 27 had wages between $501 and $699, and the remaining 4 had wages above $700 in the first quarter of 2007.

State Average Weekly Wages

At the state level, Idaho had an average weekly wage of $635 in the first quarter of 2008, $270 below that for the nation, and ranked 48th among the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Only Montana ($625), South Dakota ($632), and Mississippi ($634) had lower wage levels. (See table 3.) At the highest end of the wage scale were the District of Columbia ($1,488), New York ($1,399), and Connecticut ($1,254).

With wage growth of 0.3 percent from the first quarter of 2007, Idaho ranked 48th among the 50 states and District of Columbia. The highest over-the-year percentage increase in wages for the first quarter of 2008 was in Wyoming (6.7 percent). The only state to record an over-the-year decrease in wages was Connecticut, where wages declined 0.6 percent.

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from reports submitted by employers subject to state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) laws. The 8.9 million employer reports cover 137.0 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage is computed by dividing the total quarterly payroll of employees covered by UI programs by the average monthly number of these employees. This number is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised (see Technical Note below) and may not match the data contained on the Bureau's Web site.

Additional Statistics and Other Information

An annual bulletin, Employment and Wages, features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2006 edition of this bulletin will contain selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2007 version of this news release. As with the 2005 edition, this edition will include the data on a CD for enhanced access and usability with the printed booklet containing selected graphic representations of QCEW data; the data tables themselves will be published exclusively in electronic formats as PDFs. Employment and Wages Annual Averages, 2006 will be available for sale in early 2008 from the United States Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250, telephone (866) 512-1800, outside Washington, D.C. Within Washington, D.C., the telephone number is (202) 512-1800. The fax number is (202) 512-2104. Also, the 2006 bulletin will be available in a portable document format (PDF) on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn06.htm. In addition, the quarterly press release, County Employment and Wages, presents employment and wage data for the largest counties in the U.S. and is available at www.bls.gov/cew/.

QCEW-based news releases issued by other regional offices have been placed at one convenient Web site location, www.bls.gov/cew/cewregional.htm.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone number: 1-800-877-8339.

For personal assistance or further information on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Program, as well as other Bureau programs, contact the Western Information Office in San Francisco at (415) 625-2270 from 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. PDT.

TECHNICAL NOTE

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons--some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states' continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. However differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.


OOH Earnings Table Extraction Wizard - output frame
Table 1. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and the largest counties in Idaho, first quarter 2008(2)
Area Employment Average Weekly Wage (3)
March 2008 (thousands) Percent change, March 2007-08(5) Average weekly wage National ranking by level (4) Percent change, first quarter 2007-08 (5) National ranking by percent change (4)

United States (6)

134,761.1 0.4 $905 -- 2.4 --

Idaho

675.5 2.2 634 45 3.4 41

Ada, Idaho

209.2 -0.5 746 229 -2.4 321

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Ranking does not include the county of San Juan, Puerto Rico.
(5) Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(6) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

OOH Earnings Table Extraction Wizard - output frame
Table 2. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and the largest counties in Idaho, first quarter 2008(2)
Area Employment (March 2008) (3) Average Weekly Wage

United States (4)

134,761,100 $905

Idaho

645,288 635

Ada

209,191 746

Adams

1,063 456

Bannock

33,086 571

Bear Lake

1,581 412

Benewah

3,457 596

Bingham

14,621 541

Blaine

13,679 690

Boise

1,784 355

Bonner

13,974 570

Bonneville

45,214 594

Boundary

3,363 537

Butte

8,312 1,372

Camas

422 530

Canyon

55,097 562

Caribou

3,196 826

Cassia

9,411 517

Clark

601 740

Clearwater

2,957 533

Custer

1,522 581

Elmore

6,936 512

Franklin

3,307 471

Fremont

2,678 498

Gem

3,246 492

Gooding

6,399 553

Idaho

4,398 519

Jefferson

5,913 452

Jerome

8,821 527

Kootenai

54,505 592

Latah

13,581 535

Lemhi

2,386 486

Lewis

1,408 433

Lincoln

1,365 535

Madison

13,208 462

Minidoka

6,689 501

Nez Perce

20,874 630

Oneida

1,007 423

Owyhee

2,866 470

Payette

6,394 534

Power

3,123 581

Shoshone

4,860 607

Teton

3,096 574

Twin Falls

34,053 523

Valley

4,088 566

Washington

2,863 475

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Ranking does not include the county of San Juan, Puerto Rico.
(5) Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(6) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

OOH Earnings Table Extraction Wizard - output frame
Table 3. Covered (1) employment and wages by state, first quarter 2008(2)
State Employment Average weekly wage (3)
March 2008 (thousands) Percent change, March 2007-08 Average weekly wage National ranking by level Percent change, first quarter 2007-08 (5) National ranking by percent change

United States (4)

134,761.1 0.4 $905 - 2.4 -

Alabama

1,947.0 -0.2 740 34 3.2 27

Alaska

303.0 1.0 866 16 4.2 11

Arizona

2,639.7 -1.3 820 22 2.4 34

Arkansas

1,178.4 -0.1 667 46 4.1 12

California

15,561.5 0.1 1,008 6 2.1 41

Colorado

2,300.0 1.7 920 10 3.6 16

Connecticut

1,683.9 1.2 1,254 3 -0.6 51

Delaware

418.4 0.5 987 7 0.1 49

District of Columbia

680.8 1.1 1,488 1 4.3 9

Florida

7,918.6 -2.2 777 26 1.8 43

Georgia

4,060.9 0.1 847 20 1.3 44

Hawaii

628.1 0.2 773 28 3.5 19

Idaho

645.3 0.2 635 48 0.3 48

Illinois

5,796.1 0.1 980 8 2.6 33

Indiana

2,858.7 -0.7 757 33 2.4 34

Iowa

1,469.8 0.9 710 40 3.6 16

Kansas

1,363.2 1.0 737 35 2.4 34

Kentucky

1,794.0 0.1 714 39 2.4 34

Louisiana

1,887.3 1.3 765 30 4.8 4

Maine

584.1 0.5 701 42 3.5 19

Maryland

2,530.3 0.0 963 9 2.8 31

Massachusetts

3,203.1 0.9 1,143 4 3.3 23

Michigan

4,058.8 -1.8 857 18 0.9 47

Minnesota

2,644.8 0.6 908 12 4.0 13

Mississippi

1,138.2 0.8 634 49 3.3 23

Missouri

2,708.0 0.0 768 29 3.5 19

Montana

432.4 0.9 625 51 4.3 9

Nebraska

912.2 1.4 687 44 3.2 27

Nevada

1,266.3 -1.2 839 21 4.7 5

New Hampshire

621.2 0.3 863 17 3.4 22

New Jersey

3,939.9 0.5 1,133 5 3.3 23

New Mexico

823.8 0.6 717 38 4.7 5

New York

8,555.0 1.3 1,399 2 0.1 49

North Carolina

4,069.1 0.9 788 24 1.3 44

North Dakota

343.3 2.6 652 47 6.2 2

Ohio

5,189.1 -1.0 798 23 1.0 46

Oklahoma

1,560.0 1.6 707 41 4.7 5

Oregon

1,713.1 0.3 776 27 2.9 30

Pennsylvania

5,608.8 0.5 869 15 2.4 34

Rhode Island

464.8 -1.5 851 19 2.3 39

South Carolina

1,888.3 0.1 695 43 2.8 31

South Dakota

389.4 2.0 632 50 5.2 3

Tennessee

2,746.4 0.6 761 31 3.3 23

Texas

10,420.8 2.8 903 13 3.6 16

Utah

1,220.2 1.4 718 37 3.2 27

Vermont

300.8 -0.3 735 36 4.4 8

Virginia

3,653.5 0.2 918 11 2.0 42

Washington

2,928.6 2.1 899 14 3.7 15

West Virginia

700.3 0.3 679 45 4.0 13

Wisconsin

2,734.3 0.2 760 32 2.2 40

Wyoming

277.2 2.9 779 25 6.7 1

Puerto Rico

1,004.5 -1.6 489 (5) 4.4 (5)

Virgin Islands

46.5 1.1 708 (5) 3.9 (5)

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(5) Data not included in the national ranking.

 

Last Modified Date: December 18, 2008