Leadership Journal

Friday, April 24, 2009

Addressing Employment-Based Visa Wait Times

There have been a lot of comments and questions received from readers about employment-based petitions and related applications for adjustment to lawful permanent residence.

This is a complicated subject, so I want to provide a little background. Becoming a permanent resident based on employment can require a number of steps, including obtaining a labor certification from the Department of Labor, receiving approval on a petition for alien worker from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) (Form I-140) and obtaining an immigrant visa from the Department of State or being granted adjustment of status from USCIS. In addition, by law there are numerical limits on the number of people who can immigrate to the U.S. each year in most categories. You can see a more detailed explanation about the employment-based visa application process online.

Some readers have asked about the volume of employment applications and delays that have occurred in employment-based visa petition and adjustment application processing in late 2007 and early 2008. There were a number of factors that affected USCIS' handling of these cases during that time. Employers filed more than 234,000 petitions to sponsor foreign workers (Form I-140) as the Department of Labor cleared a large backlog of labor certification applications and implemented new regulations. Adjustment-of-status application filings also soared to nearly 300,000. We attribute the increase in adjustment application filings to a couple things. First, customers' anticipation of USCIS' filing fee increase in July 2007. Second, a unique opportunity for workers and their families to file adjustment applications based on the visa availability date announced in the July 2007 Immigrant Visa Bulletin. Many of these availability dates have since reverted, creating a backlog of adjustment applications that cannot be adjudicated until a visa becomes available.

A few months ago, a customer indicated his frustration that while he can monitor the Visa Bulletin to see how it moves month to month, he still has no idea how many people are waiting in line with pending adjustment applications or how long it may be before USCIS can process and approve his application. We know this customer is not alone! In response to that customer's request, we are working to make this information available on our Web site.

I understand the importance of becoming a permanent resident. I also recognize workers may rightly want to take advantage of the limited provisions in current law that allow certain applicants to change employers without affecting their ability to adjust status. As a result, USCIS has taken the following steps:
  • USCIS has increased the emphasis on processing employment-based petitions. Our goal is to complete adjudication on the older I-140 petitions and to process newer petitions within our targeted processing time of four months. We are making progress toward this goal and anticipate reaching this goal by the end of September 2009.
  • USCIS is issuing employment authorization documents valid for two years, as needed.
  • USCIS is working with the State Department to make sure we use every available visa number. In 2007, we had more visas available in the family-based categories than were needed, so as permitted by law, we transferred those available family-based visas for use in the employment-based application process.
I recognize that this is a difficult and complex situation and USCIS is working hard to make improvements and to increase transparency in our processes.

Mike Aytes
Acting Deputy Director, USCIS

Labels: ,

182 Comments:

  • IN ORDER TO SAVE MONEY, AND REDUCE OVERCROWDIING, IN OUR JAILS AND PRISONS, INCLUDING FEDERAL, ALL INCARCERATED ILLEGALS, IN EVERY STATE, MUST BE DEPORTED ASAP

    20 million illegals are working, in some fashion, in our United States. 20 million Americans aren't working

    Unemployment among Blacks, 13.3%,. Poor, and impoverished, among Blacks, 50%, and we are forcing Blacks to compete with 40 million ILLEGALS

    How much money would we save if we took 8 million unemployed Americans off of unemployment compensation? 8 million jobs held by illegals

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 1:04 PM  

  • Still the memo does not address the fact of how manu people are in line ahead of me. I don;t need to know how long it will take to approve.. All I need to know is what is my token (position in the line)..

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 1:14 PM  

  • Hello Acting Deputy Director, USCIS - There are some of us who could file AOS during July 2007 as we were on Vacations and out of country. Is it possible to file the AOS for such people who missed the oportunity without waiting for the Priority Date to be current. Thanks

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 1:21 PM  

  • Thank you for this post, it is good to know that USCIS appreciates the suffering of the people waiting for Green Card.

    The data above shows about 234,000 I-140s -- which, regardless of the Visa bulletin issues suggests a huge volume of labor substitution.

    What steps has USCIS taken to identify fraudulent substitutions? Being in a hi-tech industry myself, I fail to see how a tech position can remain vacant for long periods. The position either is terminated, or someone eventually takes up the job, so it is unfathomable to see labor from 1998-99 being used for substitution in 2007.

    Given the limited supply of visas, it is very detrimental to an original filer to because labor substitutions takes away their place in the queue.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 1:24 PM  

  • Thanks Mr. Aytes for this great updates. We, all EB based immigrantion applicants, are anxiously waiting for more information you promised to release so that we will have much better idea of when our cases are to be adjusted. We all appreciate the efforts you have understaken to make our lives easier.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 1:25 PM  

  • There are 13.8 million unemployed American workers, at least there will be in less than two weeks, when the April numbers are released.

    Why is there any focus, at all, on Employment-Based Visa Wait Times?

    With continuing illegal immigration, our population is increasing all too quickly, and we have no need, or jobs, for workers from elsewhere.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 1:30 PM  

  • I have been seeing the visa dates progression since 2005. The dates are pathetically retrogressed to 2001 for EB3 India. Its been 4 years now. Still there is no movement in EB3 India dates. The dates still hover around 2001. Can somebody tell how long a person should wait to become a GC holder. 10 years is not in enough for a person to be in the country and pay all the taxes and trying very hard to maintain the legal status and still not able to attain a greeen card. There should be a legeslation that atleast a person staying here past 10 years leaglly should be grated GC irrespective of visa numbers and visa dates.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 1:43 PM  

  • Mike,

    Appreciate your post and next steps. As an employment based applicant who has been waiting for 11 years. This is truely the first time I see someone at your level who recognizes our frustration and taking serious steps to fix it.

    Thank you!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 1:45 PM  

  • My Eb1a I-140 took 14 months to be processed and I-485 has been pending for almost 2 years although visa number is available and name check is cleared.

    Meanwhile, numerous 140 and even 485 cases filed after me have been approved according to the record on trackitt.com. Seems to me USCIS process cases in totally random, chaotic manner.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 2:02 PM  

  • Simple Math. There are 14 million unemployed Americans drawing weekly unemployment. 8 million illegals are illegally working. What's the ??

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 2:24 PM  

  • Thank you, I am glad to know, you are working on this.

    Looking forward to the day the info about how many people are waiting ahead of me becomes available.

    Thanks once again!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 2:38 PM  

  • Thank you for this information. Look forward to more visibility on this particular issue.

    By Blogger Awais, At April 24, 2009 3:04 PM  

  • Mr. AytesI just could not understand it; these I-140 guys could bring their family through F4 visa within less than 4 months to USA. It will take regular LPR over 5 years some time it better to become USC to bring you family to US than waiting for their visa to become current. Why USCIS transferring family-based categories visa to I40 people. I am an LPR, I could surrender my green card right now (in spot) if USCIS could bring my family here. Please guys be fair and support LPR spouses and kids.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 3:08 PM  

  • HI, IT IS UNBELIEVABLE THAT I HAD MY INTERVIEW AT USCIS IN LOS ANGELES ON OCTOBER 24, 2007 AND IM STILL WAITING FOR AN APPROVAL, THE ONLY THINK THAT USCIS SAYS EACH TIME THAH I CALL THEM IS: EVERYTHING IS FINE, JUST CONTINUE TO WAIT.... UNTIL WHEN???

    THANK YOU.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 3:15 PM  

  • Thank you for a very informative post. It's reassuring to know that USCIS is hears and understands needs and demands.

    A suggestion is to let everyone file I-485/Adjustment of Status so that applicants can take advantage of EAD (which allows applicant's spouse to work). It will also allow applicants to benefits from AC-21 provision, that is to change employer under pressing circumtances.

    My understanding is that with all applicants in USCIS system, the agency will have a better count and data.

    Thanks.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 3:19 PM  

  • Thanks for taking the time to address this important issue. If possible, could you elaborate on the plan to publish data of pending I-485 cases. USCIS already releases total number of pending cases every month, but to make it useful, the data really should be grouped by EB preference categories, and then sorted by priority dates. I understand it is a rather large project, but given its importance, more details, especially a timeframe, would be highly appreciated.

    The increased focus on I-140 will be appreciated by many as well. The current economy and employment conditions make the speedy processing of I-140 even more critical, so that people may have a chance of taking advantage of AC21 if unexpected happens.

    Thanks for a great post. Hope more is coming!

    By Anonymous An Immigrant, At April 24, 2009 3:21 PM  

  • Thanks for the effort but no thanks, Its already a patent that USCIS is the most unefficient branch of the government. It was never fixed since for the last 50 years. I cannot immagine such a powerful and rich country cannot fix a simple problem. There are only two answers for these mess...It is either America dont want any immigrants or just people working in USCIS are dumb stupid and no common sense.
    Sorry for my words, but thats what I saw. I hope there will be change.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 3:56 PM  

  • Thank you so much for attention, Mr. Aytes, some people talk about unemployment of American citizens, but I don't think they could replace my job, for example, I am special chef and cook for 10 years for people here, and do my job with pleasure, somebody would like maybe cook Turkish food instead of me? Thanks again and looking forward to see my children with me soon.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 4:14 PM  

  • Thanks to the good Director who is taking time to address our needs.I hope we will be one of those lucky ones to get our green cards approved so we can see our family.Texas Service Center,please speed up.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 4:27 PM  

  • I have been waiting for 8 years in Employment category. Where in the queue am I? Is this information obtainable from some where?

    Very frustrating for applicants and family,

    Especially this is related to legal immigrants who pay taxes and application fees all other fees.

    Any suggestion would be appreciated.

    Thanks and regards,

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 4:36 PM  

  • It may be 6-12 years before employment based LEGAL immigrants will be able to receive their green cards (GC). Please refer my analysis of the 2007 immigration statistics from Department of Labor, that shows the average GC processing time for World is 1.4 (upto 2.7) years compared to 5.5 (upto 11.2) years for India. Details here: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pezNTiCXNupwoSrZGE4kqcg

    It would be best to see legislative fixes passed by US Congress, but it may take a long time for an agreed immigration reform to pass. Considering this fact, I propose the following points to fix some of the issues administratively, where possible:

    1. Recapture 218,000 unused visas wasted over the past few years administratively, in line with Congressional intent of providing 140,000 Employment Based (EB) visas annually.
    2. Exclude dependents from the annual 140,000 EB visa cap - as the dependents are not counted in the H1b visa cap either - the primary source of EB GC applicant pool.
    3. Provide flexibility in the USCIS interpretation of "same and similar" jobs, to allow promotions and job mobility. Please help change the terminology 'same or similar' to ‘similar or better’ in the AC21 portability act, when any EB GC application has been pending for 180 days since I-485 application filing date (or 3+ years since priority date). Current USCIS rule is restrictive and pushes the applicant to the end of the line or shatters their GC dreams, if they accept promotions.
    4. Assign priority date og I-140 immigrant visa petition submission as Priority Date to those who used Labor substitution loophole in the old procedures.
    5. Abolish modern form of slavery - The present system assumes GC sponsorship for a job position in the future upon approval. The reality is that most applicants have already been working for that job for years. Please help remove the condition stating "after approval" for employment at the GC sponsoring employer -specially for cases where the respective GC seeker had already been an employee for the stated position and the GC application had been pending 3+ years or more (old) (since Priority Date). This specially benefits applicants from India, China, Philippines and Mexico because of their severely retrogressed and delayed state.
    6. Abolish discrimination based upon National Origin - Please help eliminate the per country annual GC cap. Our Equal Employment Opportunity policies allow no discrimination on the basis of ethnicity or national origin, yet the GC allotment policies force a ceiling of 7% per country irrespective of the size of a country, its population, percentage of H1b visas or any other logically explainable criteria! The US already allocates 50,000 GCs separately based upon diversity visa lottery for most countries. Just like the color of the skin, a person never chooses where he or she was born – this discrimination seems like another unjustifiable form of bondage! When the law does not impose similar restrictions on inviting H1 visa applicants from India, China, Philippines or Mexico to address the demand for adequately talented individuals, why create severe backlogs and retrogression for applicants from these countries at the green card stage? They become slaves of an unpredictable and unfair system.
    7. Auto portability from EB3 to EB2 to overcome system imposed delays - Treat experienced EB3 visa preference category applicants with 5+ years old priority date (PD) at par with the EB2 category.
    8. Abolish per annual cap on EB GC allocations - Since an annual cap on H1 visas already exists, there is no point having a second cap on a subsequent step in the process, the GC.
    9. Allow visa revalidation in the US as before - Currently, immigrants have to travel to their home country to renew their visas. If it was performed here in the US, it would be helpful in making it easier to travel back and forth during emergencies.
    10. Allow filing of 'Adjustment of Status Applications', even when visa numbers are not available. This will not create an increase in visas, but will allow a number of immigrants to avail the benefits of changing jobs while waiting for their visa numbers (AC21 – American Competitiveness in the 21st century act).
    11. Remove the clause for annual minimum period of stay inside the country after the GC approval. This would help promote entrepreneurship and grow the US business advantage internationally.

    Your initiative would help improve the lives of millions of hard working Employment Based (EB) Green Card (GC) applicants. It would help retain the USA as the leading sponsor of talent in the world and thus make our economy strong enough to support our future generations.

    By Blogger Akshay, At April 24, 2009 4:41 PM  

  • We need to know the number of pending I-485 cases, broken down by category and country (Worldwide, China, India, Mexico, Philippines). When we say "pending" we mean cases that are waiting for visa numbers to become available and cases that are current and waiting for adjudication. Please don't sugarcoat the data to make it look like you're meeting the bogus processing times posted on USCIS' website. We want to know the truth!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 4:49 PM  

  • Thanks for giving information how USCIS working. But Once the application is completed and only waiting for visa number, why not USCIS inform that your application is approved and waiting for visa number. So that person will free from mental tension and he can happly renew EAD,AP. Instead of sending money for both H1B,EAD,AP. In this way the person can buy home etc because he is just waiting for visa number.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 5:05 PM  

  • Dear Mr. Aytes:

    I take this opportunity to thank you and your department for understanding the concerns of USCIS's customers. Since Employment based AOS is heavily backlogged with limited visa number availability per year, it would really help if we have a breakdown based on country of chargeability and Year of priority date. This particular information alone would tremendously help people who are severely backlogged to plan their future accordingly.

    Thank you,
    EB3 applicant from a severly backlogged Country of Chargeability

    By Blogger crossroads, At April 24, 2009 5:23 PM  

  • Please understand, The post does not give any information because what we immigrants would like is,
    1. How many years should i wait in line to get a green card.
    2. We are highly skilled immigrants, we have goals in life such as starting a business, etc.. When will we have the flexibility to do that. Starting a business means working from purchasing, design and sales. Does AC-21 qualify for that.
    3. Please understand, giving a data of how many years will it take for EB3-I immigrant to get a green card will help a big way. If the immigrant does not want to wait for such a long time he/she would find its alternativeto move to canada or Europe where he would find recognization and not be treated as a ALIEN after few years.
    4. Next time please mention in the post, The wait time is only for India, and china because those people where were born there. We wish to make use of the talents.
    5.Does an H1B contribute to the economy and paying for the TARP. Why are they treated as a ALIEN.

    By Anonymous a immigrant, At April 24, 2009 5:38 PM  

  • Mr. Aytes,

    Thanks for this information. Please note, there must be some form of relief for severly retrogressed categories like EB3-India.
    I have been in this country as a law-abiding samaritan for 11 years now and some people managed to cut the line with illegal means are now american citizens. Example of an illegal means is Labor Subsitution which people used even when they filed AOS in July 2007.
    In my opinion USCIS has a very difficult job in its hand and it is very difficult to investigate each case individually. That is why I suggest, please look into changing the spill-up criteria of the visa numbers to always be provided for the severly retrogressed category. This always ensures atleast the backlogs do not pile up too much, like in the EB3-India category.

    By Blogger Kiran, At April 24, 2009 5:57 PM  

  • Mr. Aytes,

    Thanks for recognizing and addressing the issue. I am sure you understand pain of being in limbo for years and years. It is more painful to see someone with later priority date getting permanent residency just because USCIS moved date forward for a small window and the guy won a lottery.

    I filed my green card in 2002. If I would have known that this is going to take 10 years, I would have planned accordingly. I could not take managerial promotion, can not buy house due to uncertainity and lot more other decisions are hanging due to delay.

    There are quite a few unused visa numbers from past years available. Can USCIS re-capture those numbers to ease employment based Green Card?

    Isn't living for 10 years, paying taxes not enough to get permanent residency and live normal life?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 6:07 PM  

  • Dear Mr Aytes, You quoted CFR as the reason for allowing your customers to file I-485 only when a visa number is available. We in the EB community would like to plead if pre-adjudication is possible without waiting for the visa number to become available.

    It sounds like you recognize the value EB Community attains by allowing them to change employers under limited circumstances. We would like to expand the "limited" circumstances to a broad level allowing one to change employers after I-140 has been approved. This will reduce fraud/corruption/abuse in the H-1B visa program as the H-1B employee is empowered to switch employers based on will.

    We would also like to suggest allowing our spouses on H-4 Visas to be allowed to work just like one on L-2 Visa is allowed. Our spouses are well-educated and will contribute to the society.

    By Anonymous Peeush Goyal, At April 24, 2009 7:24 PM  

  • I am a legal employment based applicant and started my immigration process in 2004. Still waiting.... I do NOT have any predictable date for my green card approval. Due to this fact, I can not apply for any higher position job and can Not change my job-title due to my pending green card application and AC21 rule.

    I need to stick with my current position until i get my green card (but we do not know until when). But i see my friends from other country applied i485 and got green card approved and moved ahead of me in the career path with in my company.

    Is playing by rule bad or born in different country gets preferred treatment in usa?

    Could USA reward legal immigrants by improving process. (we do not want to change the process just improving process will make a lot of difference to me/legals)

    In America, everything is traceable and we know the delivery time of a consumer product. But my green card application is Not at all a track-able process. its like a black hole and I need to wait for infinite days to get the result. why???

    direct me a place where i can get an answer...

    By Anonymous Legal-EB3-Immigrant Paid Tax for 8 years still waiting for green card, At April 24, 2009 7:24 PM  

  • Thank you for making this effort at transparency. Takes away some of the frustration of being left in the dark. Looking forward to seeing the results of this effort.

    Clearly efficiency and order in approving applications is what all customers (justifiably) look for - approvals of 485 applications regardless of filing/priority date is extremely unfair for those waiting in line ahead of randomly-approved applicants. This certainly within the control of the USCIS and it is only fair to demand adherence to processing application in the order they were received. Looking forward to improvements there.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 7:52 PM  

  • Dear Sir
    I want to know how many people are ahead of me. Without this info, I am looking the visa bulletin and getting depressed every month. It is affecting my professional and personal life and related decisions. I guess I am not only one who is feeling like this, I believe atleast 80-90% of applicants feel like this. Please provide us atleast statistics and relieve us from the limo if you can not help us in giving extra immigrant numbers.

    Blesses to you from all these suffering people.

    Regards
    VRK

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 8:46 PM  

  • Mr. Aytes, you are the best Director of USCIS I have ever seen!

    You are listening to the community and making real improvements! I am so glad to hear that USCIS is working on disclosing pending adjustment applications numbers. The community has been looking for that number for a long time and the past USCIS director have never response to our request.

    Thank you!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 8:54 PM  

  • thanks for the information. But i can not understand why some people get green card very fast, maybe in 2 months, but some need wait for long time. ( I mean, people from same country and apply for same category employment-based immigrant at same time. )

    it is unfair. No as the USCIS website claimed "we process cases in the order we receive them."

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 9:17 PM  

  • Thank You Sir,
    I commend this department on the wonderful job they are doing everyday in order to keep our country safe, however we all acknowledge that a lot of work still need to be done at the border with these mexicans... it is outrageous to see whats going on down there. And all those US companies who received money from the TARP should not allow to hire foreign workers, they should hire only US citizens and those who reside here legally.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 9:38 PM  

  • Mr. Aytes, your lack of credibility makes it hard to trust any word you putout there on this matter. I find it hard to believe that despite the FBI clearance of mounting backlogs in hundreds of thousands and counting, yet, one cannot understand why the delays in EB visa processing and/or I-485 AOS petitions as well as every petition that has been in the USCIS system for years continued to be so up to this moment. Mr. Aytes, you talk about transparency in your piece here which is a good thing, but I don't see you or your office practicing it in any shape or form, considering what has happened in the past and continued to happen in the present. I anticipate that in your next monthly leadership journal article, you will definitely come out with another reason(s) why these long over due petitions and applications are languishing on your table. Indeed, integrity matters to some people, but I don't know whether it matters with you and your office. Customers like me have stopped trusting you and your monthly leadership journal postings on various immigration matters. I take the USCIS monthly online case status updates as routine joke because they don’t reflect reality. In fact, you have to earn my trust with actions and deeds on those cleared FBI backlogs that have not been adjudicated over several months now. Jim.

    By Anonymous Jim, At April 24, 2009 9:44 PM  

  • thanks for update.

    do we have timeline when statistics will be available for backlog data. total no of candidates waiting by each country and by Category (EB-3/Eb-2 or Eb-1)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 10:35 PM  

  • Dear Mr Aytes,
    Thank you for sharing your thoughts and concerns on the Employment based Green Cards. Obtaining a Green card is a very important step in an immigrant's life in America. Once they get the Green card, they will take lot of decisions including purchasing a home, stabilizing in a job, finding the right employer for his needs etc. This has a very positive effect on the economy as a whole. On the other hand waiting for Green card for indefinite time, increases the uncertainty and makes the immigrants to postpone many decisions related to their life. In the current situation, as USCIS is making it difficult to obtain or extend the H1B visa if self, many people have given up their hope of getting their Green cards. Due to H1b denials people are leaving the country by selling their cars, homes , terminating their leases and creating an unexpected economic havoc, panic in the families. Many people still feel getting a Green card is nothing but a luck because of what happened in 2007 and many wait for their turn of luck. People may be ok to wait for the process to complete once they file the 485, because of AC21, they can change the employer and make better decisions regarding their lives. Otherwise they have to keep on extending the H1B visa which is looked upon very critically by USCIS, senators etc. I do understand the feeling of many people about the unemployment numbers vs illegal immigrants vs employment based green cards vs H1B's. There are conflicting interests from all these groups of people. I definitely think that USCIS has a balanced opinion and maintain its neutrality among all these groups. One thing I would request the director is there is no need to spread the panic and fear in the immigrant community as immigrants definitely contributed their best to the prosperity of the country and getting benefited from this wonderful country, and feel fortunate to enter in this land of opportunity. USA is the only country in the entire world who will care for one single citizen and his needs, and that is why every body love to become a citizen of this country.

    My Wish list:
    1. Provide GC for all those who purchase a house using EB5 program
    2. Enable all persons whose labor is approved and worked in the country for 5 years to apply for 485, let the process take its time to get the Green card.
    3. Let USCIS play a positive role in encouraging the bright and best around the world to come to our country.
    4. Give preference to those who have studied in USA because they have already contributed their part in terms of college fees and trained enough in the American culture.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 10:50 PM  

  • Mr ayres,

    Thanks for the information. Im one of these frustrated people whove been waiting monthly to see if the 485 application will be current. My frustration is that insetad of processing and approving these I 40's that will pile up in the case , why dont they concentrate with 485 applicants! For goodness sake we are so tired of waiting and we cant even travel because of it! I hope they will focuse there retrograde in 485 instead of processing I 40's. I have been given 2 yr continuation of EAD , hopefully before it expires my 485 is gonna be approve. were also tax payers, the EB3 section are mostly professional and with bachelors degree whom we pay more taxes that with family base who will just start here in the US. so Pls SIR give more priority and attention to EB3 and 485 application...... Thank you so much!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 24, 2009 11:55 PM  

  • thanks hope all of us will received our green cards soon!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 12:30 AM  

  • Dear Mr.Aytes,

    I really appreciate the efforts from USCIS. I personally felt that USCIS is really working had these months to pre-adjudicate many of the I-485s.

    Obviously some of the in-approriate administrative issues doesn't allow USCIS to approve most of the cases, which is not really a failure from USCIS but it is failure from Congress.

    And definitely waiting for the visibility of exact wait times. If I know, how long I have to wait, I can at least make my next steps, and decide whether it is worth to wait.

    Also USCIS wasted tons of visas last few years, even though there was huge back log of 485 petitions. I really appreciate the efforts from USCIS for this not to happen in the future.

    Thanks and Regards.

    By Anonymous Manoj, At April 25, 2009 1:40 AM  

  • While the Department's announced goals are laudable, I find your statement that "Our goal is to complete adjudication on the older I-140 petitions and to process newer petitions within our targeted processing time of four months" to be troubling. There is no accountability of any kind when USCIS fails to meet its processing goals, and it seems that your focus is to quickly adjudicate new cases, and deal with the old cases when you can. I am aware of many I-140s which have been pending for more than 20 months, yet new cases fly through the system.

    The USCIS seems to apply a last in first out rule, which is unfair to persons who have the misfortune of having filed too long ago.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 2:09 AM  

  • I BELEIVE IN USCIS AND STAFF OF USCIS
    I WILL WAIT FOR RESULTS

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 2:17 AM  

  • Hi,

    Thanks for update - really appreciate to hear that DHS is aware of problems legal immigrants facing.

    Among legal immigrants waiting, there is huge block of people who are in worst possible scenario - I hope DHS/USCIS can offer some help to them (and that comes without any side-effect as noted below)

    The specific group I am referring to is, the ones which have Labor and I-140 application approved but priority dates are not current.

    Given that there is huge backlog (thanks to July-2007), situation for these folks is really really hopeless. If these people can at least file for I-485 and then utilize AC21 - they can atleast obtain flexibility to change jobs. Note that we are looking at processing time of at least 3-4 years due to huge backlog - being stuck with same employer for such a long time puts these group of people at very vulnerable position.

    USCIS/DHS can help these folks without affecting any of their processes and wait time for others.

    Thanks for reading!

    By Blogger Puja, At April 25, 2009 2:38 AM  

  • Appreciate that someone has at least started paying attention to this vexed issue which has been at the core of frustration amongst those who are waiting for the adjudication of their AOS applications which is taking years to fructify.

    Please provide a EB class based and Priority date (year wise) number of applications pending at the centers so that one can reasonably guesstimate their wait time. Please make it meaningful to decipher unlike USCIS past practice to shroud it in mystical jargon

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 4:11 AM  

  • Can USICS publish the number of available Visas's in any year along with the VISA Bulletin. Also a larger number of Employment Based petitions are filed using substituted labor's . Can USICS start auditing those petitions which were mostly used by people who jumped the line ?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 8:38 AM  

  • Sucks

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 8:54 AM  

  • I have been seeing the visa dates progression since 2005 when my I-140 has been approved. The dates are always retrogressed and I start feeling me guilty. I work at the same company as law requests, paying may taxes which I definitively must do as a regular citizen, it's my duty, but it's been 5 years now and I still have no movement in my process. The dates are now unavailable according to Visa Bulletin. Is this fair enough?. I've never been illegal in this country. One day ever. I thought it was a blessing, but now I'd rather say it doesn't mean anything for you guys. I'm still stuck here waiting for my green card. Yet, I'm worried about my sons. They are at College and I'm always being checked whether or not we have our proccess approved. Paying all the taxes and trying very hard to maintain the legal status and still not able to attain a greeen card. There should be a legeslation that could check all regular proccess like mine and take it out from the backlog or target rules and being analysed pretty much! I pray for God this one day will be happening.

    By Anonymous Lima Family, At April 25, 2009 9:24 AM  

  • To,
    Mike Aytes
    Acting Deputy Director, USCIS

    I really appreciate you trying to discuss about this matter which is very serious issue for millions of law abiding legal immigration applicants. I shall be grateful to you if you could come up with some sort of solution for people who are in long line under EB-3 (India). I promise your work will not go in vain, you will be remembered for this work in the history of immigration and of couse you will be blessed by god.

    Thanks

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 9:37 AM  

  • Thanks for looking into the issue. We all are desperatly waiting since years to get our PR and move ahead. Transparency in terms of no of pending applications countrywise and category wise will be very helpful. Also if we could know no of visas pending at the end of every quarter will be of a great help. I hope you look into these requests and that will help thousands of immgrants to plan their future.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 10:12 AM  

  • Mr. Aytes, Requesting you to include a provision so that people who legitimately wait in line maintain their priority in queue and not loose out due to porting of priority dates from EB3 to EB2. Also many of legitimate filers have lost out to people who do managed to do labor substitution by buying old approved labor from unscrupulous companies and getting ahead of the queue.
    Thanks
    A legal immigrant

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 10:43 AM  

  • Why not provide employment authorization to applicants with an approved I-140 who have applied outside the USA so we can start our employment instead of waiting outside the USA for multiple years until an immigrant number becomes available ?

    I wish I could start my job, so does my employer in the US.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 10:51 AM  

  • Why are we even worried about this? What about families? 13-15 month backlog on CDJ waiver approvals. Most of these have families like mine on hold or destroyed. But I guess if people with money need a worker than I guess we better cater to who donates to campaign funds and only continue the "lip service" to broken families.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 10:57 AM  

  • Mr. Aytes, your lack of credibility makes it hard to trust any word you putout there on this matter. I find it hard to believe that despite the FBI clearance of mounting backlogs in hundreds of thousands and counting, yet, one cannot understand why the delays in EB visa processing and/or I-485 AOS petitions as well as every petition that has been in the USCIS system for years continued to be so up to this moment. Mr. Aytes, you talk about transparency in your piece here which is a good thing, but I don't see you or your office practicing it in any shape or form, considering what has happened in the past and continued to happen in the present.

    I anticipate that in your next monthly leadership journal article, you will definitely come out with another reason(s) why these long over due petitions and applications are languishing on your table. Indeed, integrity matters to some people, but I don't know whether it matters with you and your office. Customers like me have stopped trusting you and your monthly leadership journal postings on various immigration matters. I take the USCIS monthly online case status updates as routine joke because they don’t reflect reality. In fact, you have to earn my trust with actions and deeds on those cleared FBI backlogs that have not been adjudicated over several months now. Jim.

    By Anonymous Jim, At April 25, 2009 11:08 AM  

  • Mr. Aytes,

    I understand the backlog that USCIS is facing right now. I just want to know what are your plans for people like me who after a long wait of my I-140 to get approved, would have to wait again until October (still not sure what priority date they will be posting at that time) to see if I can file my I-485?

    I was so happy that after almost a year my I-140 finally got approved in December 2008. ( I also have a question regarding this, because online it still says CASE RECEIVED AND PENDING, but my lawyer e mailed me a copy of my approval notice!?? )I will just assume they have not updated it online and it was really approved. Then came the time to start the processing of my I-485. My lawyer told me to wait until the priority date on the visa bulletin will atleast be present (my priority date is August 2007), so I said okey I will wait. Three months after, the date is unavailable!!!

    This is so frustrating because that means we cannot atleast get an EAD. My husband has been jobless for 14 months now after I told him to give up his well paying job in a different country to join me after we got married last year. We have been away from each other for three years before that. We want to start a family, but right now we cannot because I am the only one who works. We are hardworking people, I do not want him to work illegally just to help me earn to save to prepare for the family we dream to have. Also I am not happy at work now that I want to change employer but I can't because I do not want to take this risk while my adjustment is hanging. I am on the medical field and I know my position is hard to find because even now we are shorthanded and they cannot find a replacement for the two workers who have left. I am the only foreign worker at work.

    Is there any way possible that we can file our I-485 so atleast we can get an EAD and our spouses could work even if we have to wait for the green card without waiting for October? That is six months from now!!! And it is not even sure that we can file one depending on the priority date they will be posting at that time.

    Please address this issue!
    This is so affecting our daily lives! There is a roller coaster of emotions here involved. Please help us with this! We just want to start a family and support that family in an honest and hardworking way!!!

    Please take time to read this.

    Thank you and God bless!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 11:40 AM  

  • On your April 24, 2009 piece on causes of delays on EB visas and/or other AOS petitions and applications that have been pending for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,…up 11 years or so according to some postings on this forum on this matter, Mr. Aytes, you and your office have alluded to the many August 2007 petitions and applications that were filed by many hundreds of thousands of immigrant and nonimmigrant aliens aimed at beating the deadline before the filing fees increase which the USCIS levied on August 2007 took effect as possible cause of this delay. However, while that may have some element of truth in it, yet, the USCIS, in its website made it clear that the reason(s) for such huge increases in filing fees (some over 300% increase) was to hire more people to help facilitate the processing times and keep up with the anticipating backlogs.

    Now, by frequently referencing the August 2007 increase in filing of petitions and linking it as the sole reason for the delay in adjudication of those petitions defy common sense and logic, considering the fact that the USCIS added about 1500 new employees for the said course. I find it difficult to understand such flimsy explanation on this matter. You may need to revisit the USCIS website and get yourself fully abreast on the reason(s) for that August 2007 increase in filing fees and petitions. We would like to read and understand more genuine and concrete reason(s) for such continued delays on these applications/petitions for several years. According to your word on this article, we need more “transparency” on why the EB visa petitions and every other petitions and applications that have been pending for many years in your system without adjudication inline with the USCIS monthly updates on case online status. Jim.

    By Anonymous Jim, At April 25, 2009 11:54 AM  

  • Inspite of assurances given b USCIS that the are working on backlog so that the final decision is made quickly as possible ( ) What does it meant quickly over 4 years of over 15 years( ) The name check is still crating a lot of delay unncessarily ( ) The name check procedure is for everybody even the person wants to become Citizen at the age of 70/80 years and he has been living in USA for the last 15 years ( )
    I could not actually understand the logic of name check( )

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 11:58 AM  

  • Thank You Mr. Aytes for looking into the concerns of thousands of legal taxpaying employment based backlogged immigrants. We toil day in and day out for our prospective country and our families. It is a traumatic experience to wait endlessly in anticipation of green card. This endless wait is taking a toll on individuals and families. As individuals we are not able to make any career moves due to the fear of losing status. There is lot of ambiguity on the AC21 provisions. Secondly on the family front we are not able to invest in either buying a home or making long term investment decisions for kids. We suggest your esteemed office to look at 1) Removing country limit for employment based visas (it makes sense because EB is based on qualification and employment Vs any pre-defined quota) 2) pre-approve I-485 application waiting in queue and make it easier to change employment if an individual is waiting in queue for more than 2 years 3) re-capture lost EB visas so that the backlog can be eliminated as fast as possible.

    Thank You
    Law abiding legal immigrant

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 12:30 PM  

  • Hello Mr. Yates,

    My I-140 was pending for 3 years. Current state in AAO review. I lost hopes.I have below options

    1. Probably illegal and wait for comprehensive CIR.
    2. I can do that same work sitting anywhere in the world. If USCIS is so interested to ship my job away.

    This is my frustation after living legally and paying taxes for 9 years.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 12:35 PM  

  • Thanks Mike. We really appreciate your leadership for resolution of this critical issue.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 12:53 PM  

  • please i want to know how long time take for processing about I130, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR RELATIVE, FIANCE(E), OR ORPHAN

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 1:09 PM  

  • I have green card and my son born in USA he have citizenship and i have applied in december 2007, for my spouse I130, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR RELATIVE, FIANCE(E), OR ORPHAN but not processing yet? how long it take for processing?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 1:16 PM  

  • Waiting 5 years for a I-130 petition from my parents.

    Still waiting to be with my family someday.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 1:40 PM  

  • Hi,

    We do not have all time to wait for the green card, I think this situation has to be improved, because if one company like to have us, to work with them, this is the main reason to stay here. Waiting and waiting, always the same...only feel bad, because We see, that years gone, and the backlog never get better or dissapear. It's very, very Sad....
    In the nigth only pray to god, that situation get better, we only has to wait...

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 2:13 PM  

  • "In 2007, we had more visas available in the family-based categories than were needed": how is this possible when people like me have been already waiting for 10 years since the approval of their I-130 and see these poor developments in the progress of their case?

    By Anonymous Brother of an American Citizen, At April 25, 2009 2:21 PM  

  • Dear Mr Aytes,

    It is heartening to read your post addressing our concerns. You have demonstrated true compassion for the hard working and patient immigrant applicants and the complicated process we are part of.

    We look forward to your leadership input in resolving issues like retrogression (and related country based limits), so the full promise of the American life can be extended fairly to us.

    Thank you.

    By Anonymous A Singh, an employment-based visa applicant (journey of seven years and counting...), At April 25, 2009 2:36 PM  

  • Useless!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 3:09 PM  

  • Hi i am concerned about the pending file on adjustment status I-485 through asylum. I cannot understand online check status eventhough already crossed the date and pending deadline date. Its already been over deadline more than 1 and half year. How does it work? How DHS does work on? How long we need to wait its already crossed the deadline of case. I heard that somebody have already received the green card with in 6 month through this process and somebody still not getting eventhough its been over 2 years.Please response this coment ASAP if you donot mind.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 3:19 PM  

  • Dear Mike,
    This is step in the right direction which no one has every done in the history of INS or current USCIS. Keeping customer informed in the key and there has been lot of efforts from your side towards acheiving this. Only black mark is it took a while to reach this stage..but it is better late than never.

    Keep up the good work.. Hope head of DHS recognizes this accomplished. As a customer I am extremly pleased with where USCIS is today compare to how it was before..

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 3:59 PM  

  • Mr Aytes,

    Thanks for writing a piece on EB immigration based on what readers have commented in the previous blog post. I appreciate you doing so and NOT choosing to simply read those comments and send them to the bit bucket.

    As many has lamented, no one, even USCIS, does not know the make up of the backlog. In Sep 08 Stakeholder meeting, response to Q 11 a)

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    1. What is the demographic makeup of those in the current backlog? Can we get data on their nationality?

    Response: No, demographic data is not currently available and would require a special Information Technology Service Request (ITSR) be drafted and submitted to the Office of Information Technology (OIT). The administrative burden on USCIS to pursue an ITSR solution and add an additional workload on the O&M contractor cannot be justified given the level of effort involved.

    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

    I feel that the above response is completely outrageous for 2 reasons. One reason is All of us have paid fees and are continuously paying fee towards the EAD and AP extensions. It is a disservice. The most important reason is essentially USCIS is picking the low hanging fruit as described by the former USCIS Ombudsman. In Mar 08, USCIS proposed that an AOS petition should be adjudicated if the petition pending name check but other wise can be adjudicated. My I-140 was approved in Feb 07 and name check was pending in July 08. There were no RFE's on any of my USCIS petitions ever. How ever, my application was NOT chosen when my priority date was current and many folks who had Priority dates newer than mine got their GC's. So the rules you have set internally with in USCIS either have not translated into implementation or were just a response to the outside world to thwart further law suits. Its been close to a year and we are ready to play the lotto again in the final Quarter?

    A FOIA request to get the nature of backlog, ie the number of AOS petitions sorted by the country of chargeability/birth, EB category per quarter from 2001 came back with a 5000USD fee request. I appreciate you saying that such information should be available and I hope your directorate will push for publishing that information in time so that the dates this year are not swung so far into the future that once again people with older Priority dates are left in favor of the people with newer priority dates.

    I request you to avoid the same mishaps that has happened in july 07 and in the final year of last Q, during which a lot of applications with newer PD's were approved in favor of applicants with older priority dates. Its been 5 years now and I hope your name check completion effort will help move dates normally.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 4:17 PM  

  • Thank You Sir for the updates will look forward for the Information on numbers.

    EB3 Category has become unavailable for rest of the year, when available EB3-I always remains in 2001.

    Please advice and help us on:

    Recapturing Employment Visa Numbers from prior years.

    This will defiantly help reduce backlogs specially EB3-I.

    I have been in US for past 10 years and still waiting since 2002, while all my other colleagues are citizens now. PLEASE HELP EB3-I category.

    Thanks once again for all efforts.

    Regards.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 4:31 PM  

  • Mike, Thank you for the post. These steps will certainly help ease some of the frustration from the 700,000 people waiting in line for their green cards to be processed.

    However, the sheer lack of sufficient number of Employment Based visas available under the law means that several of us will have to wait for anywhere between 6-10 years before our adjustment of status applications are adjudicated.

    Based on the number of people in the waiting room, to me is seems that the ultimate solution is to increase the number of immigrant visas by law. Are there any plans for that? If not, why? More information in that regard would certainly help the immigrant community understand the process and accept it instead of feeling deprived and exploited.

    Thanks!

    By Blogger Srini, At April 25, 2009 6:57 PM  

  • Thanks for the information. It's very helpful.
    Surely the "waiting time" requires lots of prayers, patience, perseverance, and a very good performance at the work place.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 7:16 PM  

  • Very stange thing happened recently. I filed for someone in Feb 2009 and I got notice that this person has been granted permanent green card.
    This was totally unexpected!!!!

    YET I filed for someone with Dec 2007 date that is still waiting!!!!!

    This was not a H1 Visa situation...

    Don't believe the processing in order....
    Some cases move faster than others for whatever reason that we can't understand.

    Totally similar situation....

    No

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 8:08 PM  

  • Thank you Mr. Aytes for all your efforts.
    The vast majority of people belong to this category are people with university degrees who are helping to grow and strengthen this country.
    Hopefully you might reach your goal this year.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 8:29 PM  

  • Thanks Mr. Aytes, for taking care of issues, at the same time I need to request to USCIS to amend the law and see if the person who has cleared I-140 for almost 2 years and is waiting for I-485 clearance can change employer, if he is getting better oppurtunity, but at the same time his status is untouched, and has not to apply for I-140 again and the I 485 application remains the same if he can change emplyer for better oppurtunity, any comments on this please

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 8:45 PM  

  • my i-140 was approved i fieled i-485 and it's pending

    i'm in the state do i have to wait for visa number to be available

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 9:06 PM  

  • Dear Mr Aytes,
    Your focus on EB cases is most noteworthy.You cited that 300K Adjustment of Status Applications were filed in July 2007 which now do not have sufficient visa numbers available for adjudication. While true, it is worth noting that approximately 218,000 Congressionally mandated visas since 2004-2008 were lost (unused) because of USCIS processing inefficiencies.
    How about utilizing these lost numbers instead of waiting for new numbers from the Dept of State to clear up older cases? The logic being that if Congress has stipulated that 140,000 visas be issued every year, then USCIS must increase their efficiency to be able to process 140,000 applications per year. If not, these numbers should not be lost but carried over.

    Case in point: If people submitted their applications when visa numbers for their cases were available, and then USCIS could not get to it in the stipulated amount of time, is it fair to keep these applications on hold now because the new year visa numbers are not available? These applications should be adjudicated based on visa numbers that were lost in the respective years the applications are dated.

    Imagine loosing your FSA (Flexible Spending Account) money for each year even though you sent your claim receipts on time, but the processing agency could not get to it within the calendar year. That would hurt. Imagine if the same thing continued over year after year.

    By Anonymous Anne Wells, PhD, At April 25, 2009 10:57 PM  

  • “…We will notify you by mail when we make a decision or if we need something from you”. I have an “enmity-feeling” when read or listen this sentence. I think USCIS should notes that: “We will response to you 30 or 60 days after this notice mailed to you”. It will be better.
    Petitioners apply Form I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or to Adjust Status) having the same hope: RECEIVE THEIR GREEN CARD SOON.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 25, 2009 11:14 PM  

  • Thanks for this information. As an I-140 applicant I really hope that the waiting time to finalize this Visa will become very short. Hopefully every applicant will receive some news shortly. It can be a big frustation to wait for a long time without any notice. Keep it up. Thanks again

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 12:23 AM  

  • I am from the Philippines filed under EB3 category and my AOS application date was July 23, 2007 in CA, then transfered and receipted here in TX Sept 24, 2007.

    What can you say about my case?

    Please reply.

    My email is gideondavid25@yahoo.com

    thanks a lot.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 12:34 AM  

  • Thanks for the update Mike; very much appreciated! I'm hoping for an I-140 approval soon (TSC processing times passed my notice date a few months ago). The suggestion about allowing I485 submission by everyone (in earlier comment) sounds interesting; is something like that feasible? (maybe after I140 approval). Thanks!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 12:47 AM  

  • how about the I130, 3 months ago the processing time got to june2001, then all of a soudain it went back to april 1999...???? it doesn't make sence, it is like if you approved people then went back and took their GC back. ???? this is so stressfull..

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 1:12 AM  

  • MR Aytes, thank you for addressing the employment-based visa waiting period. I do, however, have a pertinent question I would love to have answered. I have been working for my petitioner for three years now, and my I 485 has also been pending for about 3 years. Can I change employers without having to refile another petition? I have a job, and I am grateful for that. But I feel like a prisoner to that job. My visa number would fall under the EB 3 category. I have called USCIS and no one seems to know if a person in my category can switch employers without having to refile an I 140.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 1:49 AM  

  • what about H1B holders those are waiting for security clearence on their H1 visa stamping? Lot of H1 holders lost their jobs because their security clearence took forever. Shouldn't be any expedite process of clearing the securiy for such visa stampings? I have been searching answer to this question for a while but couldn't get one so I am posting here. USCIS never mentioned any post regarding this issue on their site.

    Now even most H1 holders are afraid of going to their home country due to fear of stucking in security clearence.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 2:45 AM  

  • Mike Aytes' efforts in addressing the Visa Wait Times is very much appreciated. At the same time, if he can extend the AP likewise to 2 or more years, then we can minimize the costs spent on it.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 8:49 AM  

  • What about family based visa??? My husband is waiting for more than 3 years to receive his green card! I understand that it takes a long time for background information to be completed but 3 years????

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 9:13 AM  

  • Thank you for the post.There are people who are in USA for more than 10 years and work, pay taxes ,love this country and its ideas and hope than one day will become a legal citizen.I never understood why illegal immigrants sometimes get to be legal easier than a legal to become a permanent resident.I understand that there are a certain number of immigrant visas per year ,but why these numbers are rather given to an illegal to become legal and not to people who lived here sooooo many years.....and why 50,000 immigrant visas for visa lottery who brings people from outside who needs to adjust, learn English, adapt to society and culture and not 50,000 to people who are waiting in line for GC for a couple of years -who love this country and want to live here permantly....Just a thought!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 10:37 AM  

  • In our case your move is too late. My whole family were there in US last year on H1B and H4(dependent) visas with 1 year validity and my employer is willing to extended our working relationship for another 3 years and even with pending application to USCIS for extension of stay which the USCIS approved as evidenced by approval letter sent here in our foreign country, we decided to go back to our country because my spouse is not allowed to work in US even he tried going to Social Security Administration to ask for SSN for him to work, so he got bored and seeing the numerous process in getting that green card and have to wait for more that 5 golden years, my spouse told me that he can't live just waiting at home for 5 years to pass. I understand that there are a lot of applicants, but while staying there I observed that US have ways on how to make things faster like when I applied for utilities connection, its just minutes and I already used water in the faucet and used the microwave. Another instance when I applied for vehicle registration and plate, its just 5 minutes compared here in our country, getting a registration will took you whole day. How come applying for green card will take me 5 years? We went there to have a better life while working hard to serve some US citizens as evidenced by having very good evaluations from superiors and a supposed work extension filed in USCIS by my employer. It's too late.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 10:50 AM  

  • I dont understand why you do not increase the fees by 10000 or 20000 dollars to hire more employees for uscis and process the applications quicker. All the EBs are making a lot of money and the companies who employ them are ready to pay the amount required. Please hire more, double them or triple them but process the applications quickly.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 10:51 AM  

  • My I-140 has been approved since 2006 but until now I have not received an approval.whats wrong

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 11:33 AM  

  • Alberta Immigrant Nominee Program

    The objective of the U.S. Visa Holder Category is to facilitate the entry of U.S. visa holders currently working temporarily in the United States, into Alberta’s permanent labour force.

    U.S. visa holders in specific visa categories, working in skilled occupations in high demand in Alberta, may be eligible to apply to the Alberta Immigrant Nominee Program (AINP) without an application from an Alberta employer.

    Please visit:
    http://albertacanada.com/immigration/immigrate/srsvisaholder.html

    Thank you!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 11:57 AM  

  • http://albertacanada.com/immigration/immigrate/srsvisaholder.html

    The objective of the U.S. Visa Holder Category is to facilitate the entry of U.S. visa holders currently working temporarily in the United States, into Alberta’s permanent labour force.

    U.S. visa holders in specific visa categories, working in skilled occupations in high demand in Alberta, may be eligible to apply to the Alberta Immigrant Nominee Program (AINP) without an application from an Alberta employer.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 12:00 PM  

  • While the plight of illegal immigrants and the need to legalize them seems to get a lot of publicity on both sides of the political aisle, the gross injustice against legal applicants for immigration, who pay their taxes, speak fluent English and are proud to live and work in the United States, seems to be grossly neglected. So thank you very much for addressing this matter.

    I have lived legally in the US for the past 13 years. I filed for immigration 9 years ago under EB3 and have gone on to the level of Vice President, yet there is no provision to maintain your priority date while upgrading your filing status to EB2. I work in the high tech industry and every time I have to file updates, USCIS wants to know how my original qualifications apply to my current job. If my college classes from 9 years ago would apply to my current job, my company would be doomed. Despite having an approved Labor Cert and an approved I-140, with the current retrogression, I am not sure when my I-485 will be approved with a priority date in July 2002.

    And to think that I am married to an American and illegal immigrants seem to have a better shot at legalization than myself.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 12:27 PM  

  • Thank you, we are glad to know at least some one is looking into this issue. The other good news using Family based Unused visas are using for employmnent based.

    If there are only 240,000 applications pending at USCIS and we have 140,000 Visas per year, then why we are waiting for more 10 years.

    One thing for sure is there is so much fraud in substitution labours. Why can't USCIS take lead investigating that fraud.

    we are waiting for more than 10 years in Queue and paying taxes. Where is illegals living here with out paying any tax and using all resources like free medical etc.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 12:38 PM  

  • Thanks for allowing people to post comments on this website. I have been in this country for over 6 years and have a very clean record with employment, taxes etc etc. My 140 was filed in 2006 and until September 2008 there was no action on the same. I kept following with USCIS and kept getting the same letters that my case is under review and suddenly received a notification in October that my case has been denied as of April 2008 as I have a 3 year degree and combination of courses and diplomas are not accepted (My online case status still shows PENDING as of today). My Labor was drafted accordingly showing combination of courses and was approved by the DOL, whereas an officer simply denied the case without sending any RFE's or reading the case properly. We have filed an MTR in November and its still pending with the USCIS as of now. After checking with the USCIS last month, they are currently processing the cases for January, whereas my MTR is again outside the processing times. I received another automated E-mail notification that my case is still being processed and would take 60-90 days. I filed my 7th year H1-B extension (3rd extension with the same company) and received an RFE asking for my work location details and work duties. I fail to understand how the USCIS works and if the officers actually read the case before checking an individuals work history and records. We are the people who have been paying regular taxes, buying houses/cars etc, giving back to the economy and what we get in return is a never-ending wait, frustration and uncertainty.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 12:39 PM  

  • Thanks for responding to Legal immigrants issue. USCIS must recognise the need to recapture old unused visa numbers or make an one time fix to add visa numbers to fix the current retrogression and backlogs of so may qualified AOS applicants as families are caught in Limbo due to the unavialable visa numbers .

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 1:00 PM  

  • Thanks for responding to Legal immigrants issue. USCIS must recognise the need to recapture old unused visa numbers or make an one time fix to add visa numbers to fix the current retrogression and backlogs of so may qualified AOS applicants as families are caught in Limbo due to the unavialable visa numbers .

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 1:01 PM  

  • Hello Mike Aytes. We, the legal Immigrants to USA on employment category would like to really appreciate and thank you for your concern on the waiting times. As soon as a person files 485(AOS), even though he has to wait for several years for the GC visa number to be available, it is not a worry, because 95% of the uncertainity of staying back in US is not there anymore. Therefore once I140 is approved, long waiting time is not an issue. However if they are allowed to file 485(AOS) they can apply for EAD and their spouse can take up some employment which will be another revenue generation for the economy and also useful for the community. Most of the Immigrant spouses are good teachers in Maths, Yoga, dancing, etc. These skills will be useful to the US community which they can teach. Another difficutly which the immigrant employee faces is that, normally during the period of I140 to 485, Employers take advantage of the employee's visa status, since the employee is stuck with the employer like a slave. No incentives or salary increase is offered as the employer knows that the immigrant employee cannot move out of the company. Hence if the immigrant employee obtains EAD then they can benefit out of AC21 incase the situation is very bad with the current employer.

    Therefore I suggest the following:
    (i) reintroduction of premium processing of I140 for all and increase the premium to $2000;
    (ii) Allow every approved I140 to file for 485(AOS) and obtain EAD for self and spouse;

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 1:13 PM  

  • Why is there a country based quota on EB green cards.
    Shouldnt it be based on the Employer requirement.
    The Rules are inherently flawed causing this unending delays and wait for EB applicants from India and China.

    Isnt it unfair when two applicants with same skills apply at the same time for Green card, One being from Canada or UK gets it in 2 years whereas a chinese or Indian has to wait for 8-9 years

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 1:32 PM  

  • I am delightfully surprised to hear that USCIS is working to publish more information on the number of applicants waiting in line (with AOS pending) for a visa number.

    It would be extremely helpful if the information is categorized by EB categories and the country of origin and serialized by the priority date.

    Thank you very much for making such an effort and understanding the frustration due to lack of information on the EB-based visa number backlogs. The immigration community would be extremely grateful for publishing this information. Thanks a bunch!!!.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 1:36 PM  

  • If only we can travel while we are waiting. Please a work permit's holder or I-40 approved should be allowed to leave the country.

    We are under stress.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 4:42 PM  

  • Thank you for this post. But I am afraid this is all false hope.

    My I-140 is pending from November 29, 2006. i.e. It is pending from more than 2 Years. Many applications filed after mine have been approved. So there is no fairness to the process. All information customer (non)service reps give is it is being worked on and they have no time frame.

    Process while excruciatingly long comes with lot of restrictions. (Can't change employers, spouses can't work, uncertain future, etc) I am this close to give up this waiting game now.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 5:08 PM  

  • Hello Acting Deputy Director, USCIS - There are some of us who could file AOS during July 2007 as we were on Vacations and out of country. Is it possible to file the AOS for such people who missed the oportunity without waiting for the Priority Date to be current. Thanks
    Sell Digital products

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 5:12 PM  

  • Thank you for taking time to post this information.

    Have been a hard working, lawful person, staying with family and waiting for GC for 8 years now. EB3-India , JAN 2002 date , the date does not cross Nov 2001 for the past few years. When can we expect anything to happen for us. a clear picture about the expected date would be immensely helpful.

    Have masters degree , pursuing MBA currently, but had to file for Eb-3 as the company job does not require masters degree - went as per the law. There are others who are misusing the EB2 category. Is that being looked into as well?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 5:39 PM  

  • i feel frustrated as a mom whose daughter's case was separated from mine. It has been almost 2 years and she has still not received her green card. Thanks for posting this information. I look forward to more updates from your office.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 5:43 PM  

  • How much logistic is that the employer will wait 5-10 years to fill the position which he is not able to fill now as no american is availble of that skill ?? Whole this employment based green card process is illogical, don't you think Mr. Aytes ? Instead, should not we convert this whole GC process ASAP, on points based like Australia, Newzealand, Canada etc.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 5:49 PM  

  • Mr. Aytes, I have been working in the United States legally since 2005 and my employment-based EB3 Green Card process started in 2006. It has been 3 years since, and the priority date of my country of origin was 2001 recently when it became unavailable for the rest of the year. Hence, it will take another 8 years or more for my Green Card to get approved. During this 11 years of long wait for my Green Card I am supposed to be in the same field of work complying with my labor certification.

    Is there any possibility for USCIS to allow employment-based Green Card applicants like me some degree of freedom w.r.t field of work? It sounds really unfair to me that a person is forced to stay in the same field of work for a timeframe that allows me to complete more than 5 different masters degrees in 5 different fields of study in STEM! It feels even worse when I see my colleague from a different country of origin getting her/his green card already (i.e. 8 less years of wait than me) and free to move to a different job description/title whenever she/he wishes to do so, even though her/his Green Card process started at the same time as mine.

    It would be really nice (and fair) for applicants like me if USCIS considers a temporary status with the same privileges of a Green Card after our cases are pre-adjudicated and USCIS finds it approvable, and until the visa numbers become available. It would really help to reduce the misery of our lives during our long wait for the permanent residency.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 6:12 PM  

  • SIR,THANKS FOR YOUR INFORMATION.
    I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT WE APPLIED H1B EXTENSION FOR MY HUSBAND. STILL IT IS PENDING. WE ARE THE DEPENDENTS i.e H4. IN JUNE 2007 WE ALL WENT TO INDIA AT THAT TIME THE GREEN CARD VISA BULLETIN WAS OPEN. BUT AT THAT TIME WE DIDN'T KNOW THAT IT IS ONLY FOR CERTAIN PERIOD OF TIME. MY HUSBAND CAME FROM INDIA ON JULY 26, 2007 AT THAT TIME ONLY WE KNOW ABOUT THAT WE COULDN'T GET THAT RETURN TICKET. SO MY HUSBAND FILED I485 AND HE GOT EAD ALSO. BUT WE(HIS FAMILY i.e SPOUSE AND 2 CHILDREN) DIDN'T APPLY FOR THAT. WE CAME HERE ONLY IN 6TH SEPT 2007. OUR LAWYER SAID YOU SHOULD NOT APPLY NOW BECAUSE THE TIME HAS RAN OUT. YOU WILL APPLY ONLY WHEN THE PRIORITY DATE COMES. NOW MY QUESTION IS IF MY HUSBAND DIDN'T GET HIS H1B THERE IS NO PROBLEM FOR HIS WORK. BUT WHAT CAN WE DO? WE ARE NOT ONLY ONES AFFECTED BECAUSE OF THIS CRUCIAL SITUATION THERE ARE SO MANY FAMILIES AFFECTED LIKE THIS. PLEASE ALLOW US TO FILE AOS FOR THE SPOUSE AND CHILDRENS. WE NEED THE AUTHORITY TO STAY IN THIS COUNTRY WITH MY HUSBAND.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 6:14 PM  

  • Thanks for focusing on the issue.Please provide some means to get EAD once I-140 is approved, so that we can progress in our career front and the applicant's wife can apply for fulltime jobs.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 7:22 PM  

  • Thanks. Hope that everyone can submit I485 after I140 is approved regardless of the availability of visa numbers so that using EAD to work is another option in today's economy.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 7:23 PM  

  • Could you tell us approximately when a priority date of January 3, 2007 will become current? My father had applied many years back in the EB2 category and now I am no longer a derivative under him. In order for CSPA to apply the date needs to become current by October or November 2009. Is there any hope?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 8:12 PM  

  • My concern is family based immigration Category F1. It has total numerical limit of 23400 with per country limit.But the past visa issuance statistics do not seem to be matching and far below. It is stated that ' we had more visas available in the ............., for use in employment based application process". Does it mean there were no petitions under family based immigration. It takes about seven to eight years(even not certain) for a son to join the parents alerady migrated here. At least employment based families come together and wait for. It would be a great to hear about the family based visa wait time also.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 8:40 PM  

  • Mike,

    Thanks for addressing the issue. I really appreciate the step USCIS is taking. I have been in USA for 10 years and earned 40 credits through the Social security administration to become eligible for disability benifits. I hope this Green Card comes be fore we retire.

    My ten year wait is not because of USCIS delay, it has primarily me not sticking to the One single employer, So I had to finally settle down with One employer after July 2007.

    Thanks again for any effort you are doing to bring the speed to this delay.

    God bless America.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 9:54 PM  

  • please consider
    1)issuing a temp GC to all the customers whose applications are ready but on HOLD due to visa limits.
    2)Allow 485 holders to change jobs(any job-just like for GC) so that life of these people will have little relief.
    3)Allow 485 filing date as the date for citizenship filing(five years from that date)
    4.Please preadjudicate all the possible applications (with a small visa bulleting window) and approve before Consular processing applications. Please give priority to these pending applications than any new applications from any other country.
    thank you

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 10:09 PM  

  • i too suffer the same fate, my priority date for I-485 is 9/11/06 and my colleague was 10/25/06 and she got her greencard in 07/07! Here I am still waiting for my GC when 2 of my I-140s (i changed employers 2x since invoking AC21)have already been approved! My work permit is good till 2010 but i really want that GC so I don't have to renew again!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 10:16 PM  

  • There is no transparency in the procedure to interfile I-140 and I-485.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 10:20 PM  

  • Respected Sir,

    I really appreciate, you giving the explanation behind the long wait time, we have for permanent residency application.

    I have different issue, & need some guidance, as no body has good answer for this. Not even few of the immigration attornies.

    I applied for the form I-485 alongwith I-140 in july, 2007. I was single at that time. I got married in after a month in august, 2007 & brought my wife to USA on H4 visa in dec, 2007. We tried to apply for my wife's I-485 as a derivative of my I-485 application, so that she can also get the EAD, & work. USCIS rejected the application. I am confused, about why do we need to wait that long, & why can't have my wife added in my I-485 application. I am not sure, who to ask, may be a question for congressmen, but I followed your explanation, & have some hopes that I would get some sort of answer.

    The other thing is, when USCIS rejected my wife's I-485 application, they sent her application to somebody, whom even USCIS don't know, & can not tell us. The person who recieved the rejected application in error, encashed the check written in favor of USCIS. When we found it out, we communicated this to the bank. Bank adviced us to have affidavit from USCIS stating that they did not deposit the check, & hence this would be a fraud, in order for bank to proceed with finding who encashed the check. My attorney sent this affidavit with all the previous communication between USCIS, & congressmen's office in Oct last year (2008). We have not heard anything from USCIS yet. I even scheduled appointment with USCIS field office to follow up on it, but no answer. I am not sure, what do we do. We lost $ 1010, & did not even get to know, why was the application rejected. This is also very frustrating. Please advice.

    Thanks.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 26, 2009 11:38 PM  

  • I can understand about EB category...but mine is a pending adjustment of status as a dependent of primary applicant. Primary applicant (spouse) already got approved 2 yrs. back and has green card in hand on employment based category...I am still waiting.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 12:04 AM  

  • It is good to see the USCIS is addressing employment based visas but what about the family-based visas within the I-130 petitions. These applications, particularly the 3rd preference category since August 2001 - the California Service Center is not doing a great job of processing applications timely. As for the granting of an immigrant visa number, for this category it is only issuing numbers for priority date July 2000! This is such a shame. There is definite need for some attention within this 3rd preference category for family-based visas (I-130 petitions). The sad part is that I am legally employed in the US for a multinational company but once my visa expires later this year, I have no option but to return to my home country. I am guaranteed my job but once I have my permanent residence status. I think some adjustments should be made for people in such situations. After all, we are contributing positively to the US economy. Please, USCIS - devote some resources and time to the I-130 petitions to ensure that this massive backlog is somehow addressed.

    By Anonymous Alana, Hoffman Estates IL, At April 27, 2009 1:39 AM  

  • Hello Sir,

    Its great that you are looking forward to process the I140 is a 4 month duration, but what about the cases that are pending since 18+ months and secondly those pending at the AAO. It take 20+ months to process an appeal at the AAO office in the EB2/Eb3 category. So overall it takes 4 years to process an I140...its a pathetic condition. I would request you to clear all the I140 appeals pening at the AAO.
    Thanks!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 9:08 AM  

  • Till 2007 there were more EB-3 Permanent residents, from then onwards more EB-2 visa were allotted.After introduction of Perm Labor, there was alot of delays in previous filed labor and after july 2007 visa bulletin there is alot of delay. when will this end. But there are more illegal immigrants and less waiting to become permanent residents in genuine method.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 9:29 AM  

  • Thank You so much

    By Blogger Jay, At April 27, 2009 9:53 AM  

  • I have been in line to get a permanent residency since Aug 2003 (in EB-3 India category). God alone knows how many more years to go??? EB-3 dates for India does not move at all but some of my friends with 2002 PD are still getting their I-485 processed. It's weird!! It's frustrating but can't help it! At least now the USCIS process is a little more transperent than earlier. Thanks to Mr. Barack Obama!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 9:58 AM  

  • Some of those waiting for years in line are teachers for public schools unable to find math, science, and special ed teachers; and rural and inner city hospitals unable to find physical therapists, doctors, and nurses. Who among the unemployed in the US will be qualified for these positions currently and willing to go to these locations.

    By Anonymous KC Walker, At April 27, 2009 10:25 AM  

  • Like in line to buy tickets, it should be fair to process I-485 in the order of applicants' PDs after they become 'current'. Nevertheless, the UCSIS processes I-485 in a random order, which is absolutely NOT fair.

    It was clearly a disastrous mistake for the DOS opening the visa to all in July 2007, just before the (abruptly) increased fees became effective. What a tremendous case with no responsibility!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 10:48 AM  

  • Thank you for the post Mr. Mike Aytes, and happy to know that USCIS appreciates the suffering, hard time of the people waiting for Green Card.

    Also appreciate you as the first person to talk about us, at least now to take a look at the most important category that brings skills, revenue, economy, lots of other things etc etc to a great country but now this category is the mostly suffered, frustrated, exploited( say whatever you can) .

    I do not need to explain to Mr. Director, a person who should be the first person to know the importance of the employment based category for an immigrant country where all are immigrants.

    Though in this bad economy times most are worried about jobs, but this category is the one who are most concerned not only on jobs but also other several factors like status of their legal stay, for their family, education, travel abroad , suffering from employers etc etc there are many more to explain.

    Even though visa numbers decisions are decided by Government and USCIS can only provide suggestions however USCIS can reduce people frustration, tension by avoid costly mistakes done INS by like

    I am only putting some very costly mistakes during this time of economy, now all knows people used AC21 rules

    1) AC21 Portability -> Denying an AOS applications that passed 180 days with approve I-140, when an I-140 is revoked, INS simply revoke 485 just seeing I-140 is REVOKED of not looking or thinking about portability provision. Though several memos are issued by directors to instruct officers however please EDUCATE the officers on AC21 rules to avoid wrong denial of petitions.

    All knows people make mistakes, however these mistakes are really costing not only money but agony, botheration etc to the applicants.
    Applicants spend several thousands of dollars try to fix this and lot of others utilize this situation because applicants are forced to do something otherwise it is going to be illegal stay.,

    All the money saved is gone to fix these mistakes.
    I fell everybody will be okay paying money for application, Lawyer fees for what work is done, but these mistakes have severe affects on one's life.

    2) People who are in the queue and are not sure when they will become permanent resident, no dates or nothing is provided.
    now it is like
    "YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BECOME PERMANENT RESIDENTS SOMETIME IN FUTURE", when? Where? What? Will we? No one knows, not even an applicant who had not done a single mistake or fraud in the whole process. Nobody needs surprises, everybody needs information.
    People should not be put in such situations in any aspects of life.

    At least if year or period is described generally to become Permanent Resident it will be great. Now nobody can plan anything. Just suffer.
    There are several other things to write but others also need write their opinions.

    I know not a single case is similar like others, each case is different and INS has to put lots of efforts on each cases, so I really appreciate the efforts and transparency put by INS but please do consider our REQUEST and see our SUFFERINGS at least.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 11:13 AM  

  • Many people proposed that the EB visa numbers should not be counted for family members (derivative beneficiaries), but it has not been taken into account by the high-level officials & legislation.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 11:14 AM  

  • None of this explains how the Priority Date can go from 2006 to 2005 when more visas became available at the beginning of the new fiscal year, but more improtantly, how it can go from 2005 to 2003 a couple of months into the new fiscal year.

    Who is counting the applications?

    I also find it interesting that Chairman Lofgren, in her attempt to recapture unused visas since 1992, could not get an accurant count from any government entity as to how many visas were unused? When asked in a subcommittee meeting, the answer was somewhere between 250,000 and 500,000.

    Whose is counting the EB visas that are issued?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 12:12 PM  

  • Dear Mr Aytes

    Appreciate efforts put in by USCIS to resolve the problem of backlogs. But USCIS needs to impress upon Law Makers to approve recapturing of unused visa numbers. USCIS just cannot sit on the fence and expect Law Makers to solve the problem on their own.

    As soon as visa numbers are recaptured USCIS will be able to restructure entire system so as to prevent any further backlogs and get a handle on this problem of Legal Immigration.

    By Anonymous Yogesh Rehani, At April 27, 2009 12:25 PM  

  • So I waited nearly 1 year for my I-140 to be approved and now almost 4 years for my green card. Who knows how much longer I have to wait, but once I get my green card, I have to wait 5 more years to apply for citizenship. WHY I CAN'T GET CREDIT FOR ALL THE TIME I WAITED FOR MY GREEN CARD?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 12:33 PM  

  • With UNEMPLOYMENT SO HIGH in the United States, I do not feel "sorry" that there are any delays in handing over work-visa's to cheap foreign labor!

    JOBS FOR CITIZENS SHOULD BE YOUR CONCERN; NOT FOREIGN WORKERS!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 12:38 PM  

  • THERE ARE NO "UN-USED VISA'S" BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL GIVEN TO THE RELATIVES OF FOREIGNERS WHO ARE HERE!
    All visas are given out! There are no left-over visa's. They are routinely handed over the many relatives of both legal and illegal aliens.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 12:41 PM  

  • This Employment based category is used in issuing visas through US consulates. There are many families scattered... Spouses in different countries... Primary granted visa and the dependent (Spuose / minor children) not getting visa because of non - availablity of visa numbers. Even F or H category can be with there family without any wait for the visa numbers. But this EB3 Category people are still waiting 2-3 years with out their spouse/children with them.

    Please address this issue too in a serious manner. Once the primary is approved, there should not be any wait for the dependent.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 1:01 PM  

  • To,
    Mike Aytes
    Acting Deputy Director, USCIS

    Thanks for your atleast one comment that you are working for EB category...if nothing happen please tell all EB3 people specially from india and China that it takes another 20 years to get Green Card. Becuase this system looks like that.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 1:02 PM  

  • Dear Sir,
    I'm a derivative benificiary of an EB3 candidate. My Priority date was current in July 2007 but only My wife and got the visa (Through US consulate) that time and mine got delayed as the visa numbers gone unavailable when I submitted my documents on August 1 2007. From that day I'm waiting for a visa so that I can join with my family. Can you please explain how the current measures will help us for a family re-union?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 1:18 PM  

  • Dear Sir, Greetings. Just to find out for I-130 usually how much time does it take under brother & sister category. Is there any way that process may be fast because the backlog for this category is toooo long and someone whose paper filed for immigration cannot visit USA under tourist visa. vermont centre I-130 (brother and sister category) is unchanged from last 2 years, i think somewhere something is wrong.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 1:19 PM  

  • Talk is cheap and promises are a dime a dozen. Back up your words with RESULTS.

    But then again there is no pressure for USCIS to do an efficient job because they can bleed us with EAD and AP renewals as long as we are still in the queue.

    The proof is in the pudding. We'll see if things really improve in the following months.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 1:40 PM  

  • I believe recapture of UNUSED EMPLOYMENT BASED VISA wasted in the past due to bureaucratic delay should be a big priority for USCIS. This should be made avaliable ASAP just to be FAIR. This will alleviate lots of problems certain genuine legal immigrants are facing by waiting in line in the range of 7 to 10 years (ESPECIALLY for people coming NATIONALITIES LIKE INDIA and to some extent China and Philipines. It becomes really uncertain to know when you will get your permanent residency the way cases are processed and adjudicated. It becomes terribly unfair sometimes to certain immigrants who are really skilled, educated and genuine. EQUIVALENCY Issue is a big problem too and this area is not fully discovered by Immigration lawyers too as qualifying criteria keeps on changing at USCIS based on influx of immigrants, it seems. EVERYTHING AT USCIS INCLUDING PROCESSING OF CASES SHOULD BE STANDARDIZED AND MADE TRANSPERENT JUST TO LET THE GENERAL PUBLIC KNOW THE REAL TRUTH. Sometimes you call up USCIS office and they don't have any other information than just a blanket statement that your case is pending at so and so office. That's the terrible response you can get after a wait of 5 to 10 years being in the USA on H1B or EAD status and paying federal/state taxes or doing everything legally within the limits of law. I REALLY HOPE THAT THE ENTIRE IMMIGRATION SYSTEM IS REJUEVENATED AND RECONFIGURED TOTALLY IN NEAR COMING FUTURE!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 1:42 PM  

  • guys/girls,
    just dont take this blog for your vengeance. Bear in mind that in no other country you can blog something against your own govt. This is the biggest change Obama & Ms Napolitano administration has brought to us. This is a great tool to let them know what issues we think are issues. But please please don't misuse it.
    In my opinion, deputy director has done an excellent job of focussing on the employment based category when everyone is talking of other issues. This is commendable. USCIS has acheived its dealines in Labor in the past when everyone said it was impossible. Its is only matter of will.

    We really appreciate your actions sir.
    We look forward to real change... thank you.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 3:05 PM  

  • Dear Sir,

    Knowing that somebody gives an update on EB3-Employment Visa is a welcome gesture. However, I hope posting an update is not the end of it all. Reading comments would help you in getting a feel of what is happening in the real world.

    We are not illegals and we know how important it is to keep our status legal that is why we are playing by the rules. Doing the right things right! But waiting for years to file for a change of status (I485) is really a long long road for most of us who has already an approved labor and I140 just because we are from either Philippines, Mexico, China or India.

    I hope that you are also aware that we are being held by the neck and subject to further abuse and discrimination by our so called employers since they very much know that we cannot change employers and they can do whatever they want to us, outside of our job description, basically because they know we are not going anywhere. If visa numbers are limited, I think it is only but logical to count the beneficiary in the visa allocation and not the dependents. Single and those with a family of 5 is not apples to apples comparison.

    We haven't seen our families and friends for years because we are waiting for our adjustment of status which we haven't got the chance to even submit because of retrogression and visa priority dates. We are playing by the rules and everytime we hear illegals being considered for a free pass it breaks my heart.

    Bottomline, I understand that America has a lot of unemployed right now due to the current economic conditions but please do understand as well our situation. We are posting comments here because we need help. Help because we want to be free from "modern day slavery" from abusive employers. Help because we want to see our families and friends back home.

    Peace!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 3:11 PM  

  • If USCIS excuse for the backlog is no visa available, at least they should continue process the I485 and just give us advise as to wait for the visa as well as the timeframe we can get the GC. This at least help decrease our frustrations a little. What are these 1500 additional employees hired doing then?? My friends who were also on EB3 filed their I485 at the same time I filed mine, they already got their GC last year. How come I hear nothing about mine?? I now have doubt on the efficiency of USCIS staff. How does USCIS staff handles the processing? How can they explain this situation?? Are they doing their job effectively and efficiently? This could be one of those reasons for having such backlogs. This is really really very very frustrating. How come the visa availability report is like a seasaw? From 3/01/06 to U then back 5/01/05 for so many months then way back back 2003 and now its U again. USCIS should come with a good PROGRESS report as to how many were issued a GC; how many are waiting for visa availability and when the next visa will be available. Mr. Aytes we need more more FAVORABLE ACTIONS from you.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 3:28 PM  

  • Thank you so much for the helpful information! I had been wondering the same thing about those visas as I have friends from other countries having this question. Thanks for clearing it all up!

    By Anonymous College Football Blog, At April 27, 2009 3:41 PM  

  • HI,AMERICA.THANK YOU MR HYTES(THE ACTING DIRECTOR) FOR TAKING YOUR TIME TO LET PEOPLE KNOW ATLIST WHAT TO EXPECT ON I 140 STATUS.THIS IS HOW IT SHOULD BE.AND PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE SELFISH,WE ARE LIVING GLOBAL.AND THE WORLD IS TO SMALL.WHEN AMERICANS COMPLAIN ABOUT IMMIGRANT FOR JOB LOST,(UNEMPLOYMENT)POOR LIVING CONDITIONS,HEALTH CARE,EVEN DIVERSE NEIBORHOODS.OKAY WE CAN TAKE THE BLEM AS IMMIGRANT.BUT ALSO REMEMBER EVERYTIME YOU SEE 100 PEOPLE MOVE TO AMERICA,MAY BE 200 AMERICAN GO SOMEWHERE ELSE ABROAD.SO SHOULD OTHER COUNTRY COMPLAIN TOO?ALSO I BEEN HERE FOR TEN YRS.FROM ONE COUNTRY IN AFRICA.WHEN IWAS IN AFRICA MY GARDENER WAS FROM OTHER A,COUNTRY.MAINTENES,CHINES.MACHENICS,JAPANES.TENANT OF ONE OF FAMILLY HSE WAS AMERICAN.BUT I NEVER COMPLAIN,BUT LOOKING FOR MORE OPPORTUNITY THAS WHY IM HERE.SO AMERICA IS VERY GREAT COUNTRY.AND IT WILL REMAIN GREATTER ONLY IF WE DONT LAY BACK AND COMPLAIN. LETS LOVE OUR NEIGHBOR CAUSE WE ARE LIVING GLOBAL.
    THANS FOR YOUR TIME.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 5:03 PM  

  • USCIS should allocate Green Cards to all eligible people who have been here on an H1B for 5 years and having constant employment with proper taxes filed and no criminal records. H1B is anyway a speciality occupation and most candidates who are seeking permanent residency are sharp brains with a clean history.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 5:49 PM  

  • I feel, as one of the people on the waiting list, we are being penalized by trying it the "right" way. It's one thing to blame on people who are unlawfully present in the U.S., but totally different to blame those who are trying to do it without violating the policy.

    Those who blame on people from other countries should realize that their ancestors were once on our shoe, probably with much looser rules. They are being so unfair...

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 6:24 PM  

  • Hello

    Are there any plans of USCIS to use unused employment based immigration visas that were lost in the past due to bureaucratic delay? If this happens, it would be very helpful to the entire immigrant community.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 6:43 PM  

  • Here's a solution doable in your level Mr. Aytes that can solve a big chunk of the problem pie:
    For those with approved I-140, let them file AOS,and have that EAD and travel permit. Your article, though we appreciate very much, is "looking at the trees, not the forest". The "forest" is "we only have one life to live and we don't intend to use whatever is left of it tied to the same employer and separated from my family, while waiting for that elusive GC."

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 9:38 PM  

  • Illegal immigrants and employment-based visas is like comparing apples with oranges. ALL employment-based immigrants are processed based on something-education or relevant experience. They are not the type of workers taking with all due respect jobs that pay minimum wage. Canada has had this system for as long as I can remember and it is very benefitial to their country first and everyone else after, to attract emmigrants who are educated, speak the language, family oriented and experienced. As opposed to swimmers or people who just cross the border and we have no idea WHY they are running or who they are. If someone comes into the US from a third world country in a bathing suit -how exactly do we get his identity checked? Especially if the country where he/she comes from has no legal system or you can just get anything for the right amount of cash. Someone who even the American Consulate didn't get a chance to check on.
    And at the same time someone who plugs right into life here-speaking the language, educated, has to waste years to be able to give back to the community

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 11:00 PM  

  • If you are not American Indian, you have no right to say this.

    We appreciate the hard work done by the USCIS.

    As millions of highly educated students, most of them get scholarship to study here in the US, go back to their home countries. I will say they could have been countless best and brightest folks in Gene techology, computer science and various industries that can lead the US to the next boom. Now, they are being forced out to strengthen the US's competitors.

    I will cite UK at this time. Arrogance is the typical common symptom.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 27, 2009 11:40 PM  

  • I want to adjust my status to legal permanent resident but my company is not working on it, is there any way that I can do it my self?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 12:07 AM  

  • People, why you are so anxious to get your Green Cards or to have other stuff aproved when you want and when you dream? As one of you, I'm waiting for my Green Card to have it through Emplyment, and I'm waiting it since 2003, and i'm not complaining ot being anxious as you are . Get a good tip from me, once you apply, you should know, Patience is the vertue of all, get used to waiting for years and years. So what if you got your I 485 aproved? you think you'll get your Green Card faster? Not in your Dreams buddy. When your priority date will be up, then you will get it, till then, sleep tight and don't worry, when your turn is gonna be ready, you will jump in your car to get your stamp in your passport and to get your GC. Also , People, stop bitching about frustration, don'r make a drama from that. So what is the backlog? We all survive and wait. What makes you special from me that you applied in 2007 or 2008 ?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 12:52 AM  

  • Mr. Aytes,

    I do agree with Anonymous, April 24, 2009 1:43pm and Anonymous, April 24, 2009 4:27pm.

    For many years, you are the first ever in your position who took the time in listening to our concern. I do sincerely appreciate your effort.

    I do agree with some of the readers that if USCIS will at least give us an update of how far along each application or perhaps each country have to wait, we will have a better understanding of the situation. Some of us are eager to travel to visit our ailing parents. Last year, one of my parents had a stroke. It was really difficult for us not to be able to visit them.

    My spouse and I are one of those who are lucky and very privilege to hold an EA card. Issuing a 2 yrs EA card instead of 1 yr makes a difference because it helps us save time and money. So, I commend USCIS for the idea.

    We filed our papers since 2001, and have been waiting for our I140 approval since 2007. My sister and her spouse applied about the same time and already received their GC last December. So, I hope we will receive our GC early this year. We are looking forward to travel and have a wonderful reunion with the rest of our love ones this Christmas.

    We do appreciate the USCIS effort and are looking forward for more updates.

    Thank you very much.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 5:51 AM  

  • I do apologize for the wrong information as per my comment. What I meant was "I485", not I140. Thank you.

    See below original message:

    Mr. Aytes,

    I do agree with Anonymous, April 24, 2009 1:43pm and Anonymous, April 24, 2009 4:27pm.

    For many years, you are the first ever in your position who took the time in listening to our concern. I do sincerely appreciate your effort.

    I do agree with some of the readers that if USCIS will at least give us an update of how far along each application or perhaps each country have to wait,
    we will have a better understanding of the situation. Some of us are eager to travel to visit our ailing parents.
    Last year, one of my parents had a stroke. It was really difficult for us not to be able to visit them.

    My spouse and I are one of those who are lucky and very privilege to hold an EA card.
    Issuing a 2 yrs EA card instead of 1 yr makes a difference because it helps us save time and money.
    So, I commend USCIS for the idea.

    We filed our papers since 2001, and have been waiting for our I140 approval since 2007.
    My sister and her spouse applied about the same time and already received their GC last December.
    So, I hope we will receive our GC early this year. We are looking forward to travel and
    have a wonderful reunion with the rest of our love ones this Christmas.

    We do appreciate the USCIS effort and are looking forward for more updates.

    Thank you very much.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 5:58 AM  

  • Mr. Director, I appreciate your time, Please allow LPR spouses and kids to visit sometime. I understand that there are specific visa numbers of LPR spouses and kids per year but visiting visa will not harm this Country. Please please Mr. Director be fair and allows or push for visiting visa for these families even if for 3 months per year.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 9:44 AM  

  • Dear Mr. Aytes,
    Thank you for taking the time to write something about this subject.

    We were invited and brought from Europe to the US of America my family and me by an American Corporation in 2003 on a L Visa, since July 2004 we applied and have followed and completed all the required stages, labor certification, I-140, I-485 all the requirements needed to become a Permanent Resident, moreover, we have been on a status Current since the end of 2007 and waited for more than a year the arrival of our Green Cards. And now the process has been retrocessed by USCIS for God knows how long. USCIS has had more than a year to issue our Green Cards because we were Status "Current", and now not anymore! I am a Senior Software Engineer working on projects for the DoD and my wife is professor at UMass, we pay our taxes here and are treated like second class persons which for me is pure discrimination, infrahumanitary and derogatory, because we are LEGAL immigrants and human beings. Albeit beyond anyone's control because USCIS is not methodical in its handling of these cases. When USCIS sent new biometrics appointments for me and my sons, they should have also sent a new one for my wife and then all the cases could have been approved far before March 2009 before the priority date rollback. Now, the priority date has retrogressed about a year, and WE are looking at another ridiculously long wait. If this were just a consequence of the PD backlog it would be one thing, but OUR cases has been current for over a year in both PD terms and processing time terms, and should have been approved by now!! You have to understand that there is no way to call or write USCIS about the fingerprints. The National Customer Service number is useless - staffed by contractors who just have a script. There is of late a TSC email address, but I emailed them to no avail. If one get lucky and someone happens to pull it off the shelf to adjudicate it and realize this on their own. This is a terrible system, or no system at all, needless to say. Plus take into account that now, we are Advance Parole which is a deprivation of the right to travel freely, thus a L visa cannot be renewed more than 5 years.
    It is a traumatic experience for my family and me and psychologically hard to cope with it.
    Very sincerely and respectfully.
    Pedro Martinez Chico a Tax payer.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 9:47 AM  

  • Thank you for the update. As an employment based applicant who has been waiting for 08 years. This is the first time I see someone recognizes our frustration and taking serious steps to fix it.Immigration laws are broken and I-140 and I-485 is taking double the time to be approved.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 10:43 AM  

  • Dear Mike Aytes,
    I apppreciate Your clarification . But for making transaprency its not that hard , as a employee , Employer and govt Agency We all need too be transaparent . like for apprving I -140 Case You just need to show employee name against whom I-140 have applied , Its not a hard task . on that way all three ( govt agency , employer , employee ) are transaparent.
    2. and another in every comunication released by USCIS if there will be any email id it should be better . so that we can send questions.
    I belief immigration policy has been formulated here based on more Employer View not ( with Employees View ) so when formulating any immigration laws You should here ( both Employer and Employee ) .

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 11:26 AM  

  • I have been in this country for almost 11 Years, During this time, I got Married, Got two Kids in this country. I had always been Legal, Hard Woking and abide by the laws of USA. I have paid all my taxes and bough a home during reccession. what more can we do to gain your trust? One mistake i did was to apply for EB3. After 11 Years, when i went back to my Birth Country for a vacation, I feel like a stranger. I am neither a US Citizen nor belong to my Birth country. Please releive us from this kinda pain. Please bring out a Immigration Law that is simple: If a person stays in US for five years legally and paid taxes and no police record, he should be given GC. Same rules apply for a person who stays here for ten Years legally and Paid taxes * no Criminal records should be given US Citizenship.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 11:57 AM  

  • Good thing this is being looked into now. One suggestion
    * Just give green card to H1B holders that bought a house(This will solve most of the backlogs! simple)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 12:09 PM  

  • PLEASE HELP!!! I HAD MY INTERVIEW AT USCIS IN NEWARK, NJ ON SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 AND IM STILL WAITING FOR AN APPROVAL, THE ONLY THINK THAT USCIS SAYS EACH TIME I CALL THEM IS: THE APPLICATION IS PENDING, JUST CONTINUE TO WAIT.... EVEN MY FINGERPRINTS EXPIRED TWO YEARS AGO!!! AND I STILL HAVE NOT RECEIVED A NOTICE FROM USCIS TO REDO FINGERPRINTS... I WANT TO LIVE NORMAL LIFE, I WANT TO BE ABLE TO TRAVEL, SEE MY FAMILY AND FRIENDS... THE PROCESS TAKE SO LONG! IT IS NOT FAIR TO MAKE US WAIT FOR SO LONG! WHAT ABOUT OUR HUMAN RIGHTS???

    THANK YOU.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 1:00 PM  

  • I'm eligible to get SSN benefit, reached 40 Points. Still I'm waiting for GC.

    Akshay's points are valid, Please consider them.

    Mike Aytes is trying to do good for Legal Immigrants, I wish him to succeed in his efforts.

    Tx
    -Legal Migrant

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 1:24 PM  

  • “…I have a job, and I am grateful for that. But I feel like a prisoner to that job…”
    Yes, friend! There are many petitioners “in the same boat” like you. Because of green card, many companies or organizations use their dirty-hands to restrains the employees during the time they are waiting for green card. For example, many Buddhist associations expel Buddhist monks and nuns out of their temples during their case pending. I have 4 friends, they’ve been approved I-360. However, during the time they submitted I-485 (AOS), the Director Board of Buddhist Association try to expel the monk or nun out of the temple, then they sent a letter to USCIS cancel monk or nun’s application.
    Is USCIS try to makes more hells on earth by the way they are working? => “…We will notify you by mail when we make a decision or if we need something from you”.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 2:11 PM  

  • Dear Mr Aytes

    Appreciate efforts put in by USCIS to resolve the problem of backlogs.

    For applicants with approved Labor and 140 must be treated fair by giving them a chance to change the job or giving them ead that will let millions of ppl on track.

    Thanks
    Sam

    By Anonymous Sam, At April 28, 2009 3:14 PM  

  • Dear Mr. Aytes,
    Please consider that, there are a lot of petitioners suffering from employers while their I-485 is pending. Especially in EB4 – Religious workers (their I-360 has been approved).
    So please think ahead that (as some one given above):
    1, Issuing a temporary Green Card (ex: 3 years) to all the customers whose applications are ready but on HOLD due to visa limits.
    2, Allow I-485 petitioners able to change jobs or employers.
    3, Please pre-adjudicate all the possible applications.
    Religious workers – Victims by USCIS pending cases

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 4:18 PM  

  • Can USCIS come up with some relief (like EAD and AP documents) for those emplotment based GC applicants who are pursuing consular processing (CP)? These applicants are here in the US on H1B just like a 485 applicant but do not have the safety of EAD.

    With the undue delay in priority dates becoming current, doesn't it make sense to issue EAD to people on CP queue?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 4:28 PM  

  • Allow every approved I140 to file for 485(AOS) and obtain EAD for self and spouse

    pls treat humanly as this is the modern apartheid by employers who misuse the ppl who are waiting to file 485 and waiting for infinite time.

    Allowing EAD for approved 140 will resolve 70% of the problem.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 5:16 PM  

  • Dear Sir, Mr Aytes,

    Please help us, a lot of people here, have family, and you know, if we do not have the greencard, we do not have anything, we can get the ead, the h1b, all temporary document we have, but if we do not have the greencard, we will be always, in the clouds.

    Dear sir, a lot of persons, have made great sacrifices for that visa, to get a better life with their family, their parents. I think the United States, always will be the best country in the earth. We love this country, so much.

    Help us, sir.
    god bless,

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 7:39 PM  

  • I happened to chance upon this article which was impressive to note. But reading the comments blew my mind off. Is this for real? I can understand this happening in the "Third World" (pun intended.

    Is anyone from the Department or Leadership reading this? Should we send this link to the Office of the President so he is aware of how his Departments function and the Thought Leadership of these Departments? Wish they adopt some thoughts from these comments.

    Good Luck Guys. I am sorry you are treated worse than illegal immigrants. Could the reason for their privileged treatment be that they are willing to circumvent laws (and turn in fraudulent votes during elections?). Keep Hoping for the Change that was promised.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 28, 2009 9:29 PM  

  • Good information, thanks for working on the legal immigration issues and fixing the problems.

    The irregular PD (Prority Date) changes, and wasting the already limited visa numbers indicated that there are areas to improve in handling legal immigration applications by USCIS and DOS.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 29, 2009 9:24 AM  

  • You all needs to walk the walk not just talk the talk!! You ain't doing anything but getting a paycheck!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 29, 2009 10:10 AM  

  • Thank you very much for the informative post, Mr Aytes. But will it be possible to post the numbers of pending cases of employment-based I-485 applicants born in different countries (China, India, Mexico, Philippines, and Rest of World). And if the numbers for each country can be divided into different groups according to EB categories (EB1, EB2, EB3, etc.) and priority dates (like Jan 2005, Feb 2006), it will be really nice for us, the EB applicants to estimate the positions we are at in the line.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 29, 2009 11:39 AM  

  • Director Aytes:

    We appreciate you coming out and making us understand the process.

    As much as many people ask question, people like me have done more math and analysis on the way processing is handled.

    We are under the impression we are being grieved more than necessary.

    We understand the unavailability of visas, but that doesnt equal to unavailability of I-140 movement.
    I personally am starting to think this backlog has given the processing centers more reason to move at a more relaxed speed than expected.

    Considering, I've read multiple threads saying USCIS has hired more help direly needed to adjudicate cases, it seems productivity isnt an equal factor to the number of adjudicators.

    I'm sure someone will say but there was a surge of numbers of I-140's being processed recently and I agree and we thank you for that but what is the reason the surge has died?

    We urge you, we understand you may not be able to make visas available but it is very probable for you to improve I-140 processing to make it faster.

    Living in limbo for 2-3 years is not fun and sooner or later talent will go away.

    Yes we may all not be exceptional geniuses, but many of us are very capable.

    Make those capable people more useful to the country.

    -translated-

    By Anonymous translated, At April 29, 2009 2:21 PM  

  • Thanks for update - really appreciate to hear that DHS is aware of problems legal immigrants facing.

    Among legal immigrants waiting, there is huge block of people who are in worst possible scenario - I hope DHS/USCIS can offer some help to them (and that comes without any side-effect as noted below)

    The specific group I am referring to is, the ones which have Labor and I-140 application approved but priority dates are not current.

    Given that there is huge backlog (thanks to July-2007), situation for these folks is really really hopeless. If these people can at least file for I-485 and then utilize AC21 - they can atleast obtain flexibility to change jobs. Note that we are looking at processing time of at least 3-4 years due to huge backlog - being stuck with same employer for such a long time puts these group of people at very vulnerable position.

    USCIS/DHS can help these folks without affecting any of their processes and wait time for others.

    Thanks for reading!

    By Anonymous Sam, At April 29, 2009 2:27 PM  

  • To all those who are making recommendations to Mr Aytes on allowing 485 filing with out visa number, approving 485 application with out visa number, go read the INA act. INA act prescribes that a visa number should be available at both times. Mr Aytes only implements the act. He is neither in the business of writing legislation (of course with all his experience, he will be a good candidate) nor has the capability to do some thing that is out of what the INA act says. Of course, If Mr Aytes wanted to make recommendations to congress in the yearly report on how to make the EB system better, all your choices are good candidates. Unless there is a legislative change, such requests are not going to any where with out amendments to the INA act.

    go to immigrationvoice.org and participate in the advocacy effort to get your voice/problems heard.

    Mr Aytes, Please let us know the nature of the backlog ie the number of 485 applications pending sorted by country of chargeability/birth, Priority date of each USCIS quarter from 2001 in the retrogressed categories. People can make decisions they have to make. Please do so.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 29, 2009 5:21 PM  

  • Hi Thanks for the Update.

    Many of us like me in this country for 10 years starting from education and to Job.We paid taxes and every stuff to be in legal status.Eceonomy is bad now and we all agree with that.How many years we have to wait to get legal residents where we dont have to worry about status.We cannot work for different employers and if we change job we have to go through all the process from scratch.Please provide the time limit and logs.We legal people have to face problems with job hunting and legal status where we got oppurtunity to shift jobs as we are stuck with our company and if we change our H1 are getting rejected.please understand our frustrations.we are here to better our life not to live with frustration each day.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 29, 2009 6:08 PM  

  • Dear Mr Aytes

    Like you see everyone has poured there heart out. In fact this is a subject which needs to be dealt with topmost urgency.

    MY SUGGESTION:

    Going forward have some kind of mechanism wherein no further backlogs is created ........... one possible scenario could be to allow future GC filings to be done only when a visa # is available. That way you are controlling the flow right at the source.

    Now you need to look into the backlog cases, for that you can:
    1 Capture all unused visas of prior years (this does not need any law to be passed since these are vacant #'s lying..... this is same as you porting #'s from Family to EB in 2007)

    2 Remove per country quota, as rightly said above when there is no limit on H1B then why on GC

    3 Count a number of 1 for the whole family.

    4 Relax the AC 21 rule, that way one will have the freedom either to work for similar occupation or start any business(like others GC and Citizens do)...... the precondition should be that his 140 is approved and his 485 is preadjudicated (here again a definate time frame should be there and this should be given by USCIS/ DOL, since it is pending for no fault of ours )

    Most of us are waiting to invest in this country by buying houses, but given the unstable economy we are not doing so. Just imagine you in same situation as us, will you buy a home when you do not know if you can stay here legally for next 5-8 years (that is the average time it will take for US housing prices to stabilise).

    Especially people from India and China are getting hugely impacted with this endless wait. We all need to know that what month and year we will get our GC's

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 29, 2009 7:28 PM  

  • appreciate the effort.
    please do all thats possible to further speed up things.

    maybe move some the "bailout" money increase manpower even further, thereby reducing unemployment and helping out LEGAL immigrants.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 29, 2009 8:05 PM  

  • USCIS Case Status Services is not working properly, for instance many I-485 cases transferred to Texas Service Center are not being updated since 2007.
    We will appreciate your intervention to fix this problem since the only way to know the actual status of those cases is talking to a Texas Service Center representative.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 29, 2009 8:20 PM  

  • Mr.Aytes,

    Appreciate the gesture and hope that concrete action would soon follow. Why are US educated applicants (with a graduate degree) clubbed with the rest of the immigrant visa applicants? While there is a 20K H1-B visa allocated to the same, using the same rationale why not give them preferential treatment in the EB queue as well? Since these are possibly the cream of their native nations who could potentially contribute a great deal to America's progress.

    Which is more beneficial to America - 12 million poorly educated illegal immigrants or a fraction of that number of highly educated individuals who are among the very best in their native countries? Prioritizing these tasks seem fairly easy but for some inexplicable reason we are in the situation that we are in. Would greatly appreciate your attention here.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At April 29, 2009 8:24 PM  

  • Good that USCIS has recognized the fact that there is an issue of backlog and there are people working in Country for 8-10 years and still waiting for theie GC. I would appreciate if the USCIS can take appropriate steps to make sure that the people waiting in the queue for long is considered first, especially in the last quarter where they push the EB2 India/China priority date randomly and pick some lucky ones and issue the visa. I know USCIS is trying not to waist the visa number available, but it has to be done in a fair way to the people who are suffering for years. In the last quarter of 2008 many in EB2 India priority date of 2005 and 2006 got their GC, while there are still 1000s of people from 2001 and 2002 still waiting. Hope USCIS will take appropriate steps to prevent this kind of injustice happen again.

    By Blogger Anil Peter, At April 30, 2009 3:19 PM  

  • How about family based applications? Especially F2 and F3 categories? We wait and wait and wait and nothing happens. In all fairness, all categories should be given equal priority and please we need more transparency to know what is actually going on. Are the processing times really true? Or are they 'updated' every month to give us an illusion of what is going on? How many applications are pendng? Really? Or are we investing our hard earned money into a bottomless pit? I can't wait to see what you come up with next . . . . . . . .

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 2, 2009 3:30 PM  

  • Dear Mr Aytes,

    Appreciate your efforts on getting us the status update on what is happening on the AoS applications filed durint the July-Aug 2007 Visagate. we are also seeing the results of USCIS's initiative for pre-adjudicating the AoS applications for retrogressed applicants from india and china.

    Can USCIS request US congress to get some kind of administrative fix or a change in law to recapture the old unsed VISA numbers lost due to the backlog in processing the AoS applications on time?

    This will give a huge relief for the folks like me who are standing in line since the year 2001-02 for their turn, they were the victims of backlog in the local state employment agencies for the labor certification process in the over populated (EB immigrants) states like NY,NJ,CA and WA.

    We would also like to request USCIS to closely scrutinize the Labor Substituion practices used by certain employers and who literally sold those labor certifications in the open job markets prior to the last date of sunset on labor sub rule which is July 14th 2007.

    We strongly believe that the EB-3 India PD is stuck in 2001 due to these malpractices in the Lab sub rule and people took short cuts to get their EB based Green Card.

    I would also like to thank USCIS and DOL for getting rid of the labor sub rule.

    sincerely.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At May 2, 2009 9:30 PM  

Post a Comment

Thank you for leaving a comment at the Department of Homeland Security Leadership Journal. Comments submitted to the Department of Homeland Security Leadership Journal will be reviewed before posting.



Create a Link

<< Home