Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
PET Scan and CT Scan in Evaluating Response in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Lung Metastases
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by National Cancer Institute (NCI), December 2008
First Received: September 26, 2006   Last Updated: February 6, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsored by: Institut Bergonie
Information provided by: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00382252
  Purpose

RATIONALE: Radiofrequency ablation uses a high-frequency, electric current to kill tumor cells. Diagnostic procedures, such as PET scan and CT scan, may help doctors measure the patient's response to treatment.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying PET scan and CT scan to see how well they work in evaluating response to treatment in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for lung metastases.


Condition Intervention
Metastatic Cancer
Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific
Procedure: computed tomography
Procedure: positron emission tomography
Procedure: radiofrequency ablation

MedlinePlus related topics: CT Scans Cancer Nuclear Scans
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Diagnostic, Open Label
Official Title: Study of Positron Emission Tomography/CT Scan for Response Evaluation After Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Lung Metastases

Further study details as provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI):

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) and CT scan in measuring response at 3 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, and false-negative rate of PET/CT scan [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Morbidity associated with RFA [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Overall survival [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 80
Study Start Date: September 2005
Detailed Description:

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) and CT scan in measuring response at 3 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with lung metastases.

Secondary

  • Determine the agreement between observers analyzing PET/CT scan results.
  • Determine the outcome of these patients.
  • Determine the false-positive rate and false-negative rate of PET/CT scan at 1 and 3 months in these patients.
  • Determine the optimal time for obtaining a negative PET scan.
  • Determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET/CT scan at 1 and 3 months.
  • Determine the morbidity associated with RFA.
  • Determine the disease-free survival after RFA and the factors predicting recurrent disease in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

Patients undergo positron emission tomography (PET) and CT scan at baseline. Patients then undergo radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for lung metastases.

PET/CT scan is repeated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after RFA.

After completion of RFA, patients are followed by clinical examination and conventional scanning at 6, 9, and 12 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 80 patients will be accrued for this study.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed cancer
  • Radiologically suspected pulmonary metastases

    • May be confirmed histologically or by specific markers
    • Less than 6 lesions
    • Lesions < 40 mm
    • Prior positron emission tomography shows 1 hyperfixation (standard uptake variable > 3) at the level of lesions to be treated
    • Lesions must not be attached to or next to major mediastinal structures
  • Radiofrequency ablation planned as treatment

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Life expectancy > 6 months
  • No uncontrolled medical condition, including any of the following:

    • Psychiatric condition
    • Infection
    • Coronary insufficiency
    • New York Heart Association class III-IV heart disease
  • No other serious condition
  • No contraindication to general anesthesia
  • Not pregnant or nursing

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • At least 30 days since prior participation in an investigational study
  • At least 30 days since prior chemotherapy
  • No other concurrent investigational agents
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00382252

Locations
France
Centre Hospitalier de la Cote Basque Recruiting
Bayonne, France, 64100
Contact: Denis Arnaud, MD     33-5-5944-3535        
Hopital Haut Leveque Recruiting
Pessac, France, 33604
Contact: Oliver Corneloup, MD     33-5-5765-6565        
Institut Bergonie Recruiting
Bordeaux, France, 33076
Contact: Francoise Bonichon, MD     33-556-333-321        
Sponsors and Collaborators
Institut Bergonie
Investigators
Study Chair: Francoise Bonichon, MD Institut Bergonie
  More Information

Additional Information:
No publications provided

Study ID Numbers: CDR0000510046, IB-2005-30, INCA-RECF0142, IB-TEP-ARF-MPs-05
Study First Received: September 26, 2006
Last Updated: February 6, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00382252     History of Changes
Health Authority: Unspecified

Keywords provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI):
unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific
lung metastases

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Neoplasm Metastasis

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Neoplasms
Neoplastic Processes
Pathologic Processes
Neoplasm Metastasis

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 07, 2009