![]() |
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored by: |
DePuy International |
---|---|
Information provided by: | DePuy International |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00733330 |
The primary objective of this investigation is to compare the precision of long leg alignment achieved by the two types of procedure. The secondary objectives of this investigation are to: Compare the accuracy of long leg alignment achieved by the two types of procedure.
Compare the number of optimal implantations achieved by the two types of procedure.
Compare the clinical performance of the knee replacement in subjects who have undergone one of the two types of procedure.
Compare the functional outcome achieved by subjects who have undergone one of the two types of procedure.
Compare the interface radiographic appearance 5 years post-operatively between the two types of procedure.
Compare the accuracy and precision of long leg alignment achieved by the two types of procedure 5 years post-operatively, ie at final follow-up and also the change in accuracy and precision between the final follow-up and baseline. Compare the Adverse Events experienced by the subjects who have undergone the two types of procedure.
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Osteoarthritis |
Device: Either P.F.C. Sigma or L.C.S. Complete knee replacement Device: Either P.F.C. Sigma or L.C.S. Complete knee |
Phase IV |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Treatment, Non-Randomized, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | Computer Assisted Navigation in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparing the Alignment Achieved Using the DePuy Ci Minimally Invasive (Mi) Versus the DePuy Non Navigated Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. |
Estimated Enrollment: | 154 |
Study Start Date: | January 2005 |
Study Completion Date: | November 2008 |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
Conventional TKR arm: Experimental
77 patients to receive treatment with either a P.F.C. Sigma or L.C.S. knee using the conventional manual surgical technique
|
Device: Either P.F.C. Sigma or L.C.S. Complete knee replacement
Orthopaedic implants for total knee replacement implanted with a standard approach using standard instrumentation
|
MiTKR CAS arm: Experimental
77 patients to receive treatment with either a P.F.C. or L.C.S. knees in chronological order into the CAS group which will use minimally invasive surgery and computer navigation
|
Device: Either P.F.C. Sigma or L.C.S. Complete knee
Orthopaedic implants for total knee replacement implanted with a minimally invasive approach and computer navigation
|
Primary endpoint: to compare the precision of the long leg alignment of the Ci MiTKA vs. the non navigated conventional TKA, specifically 3 months to demonstrate the variability of the mechanical axis.
Secondary endpoints:to compare the precision of the long leg alignment of the Ci MiTKA vs. the non navigated conventional TKA specifically to demonstrate the proportion of procedures that fall within a satisfactory alignment window in either group.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
United States, North Carolina | |
Wake Forest University | |
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27106 | |
Australia, South Australia | |
Sportsmed | |
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5069 |
Principal Investigator: | David Pollock, FRCS | Wake Forest University, Carolina |
Responsible Party: | DePuy International (See above) ( Mick Borroff ) |
Study ID Numbers: | CT 03/10 |
Study First Received: | August 11, 2008 |
Last Updated: | April 7, 2009 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00733330 History of Changes |
Health Authority: | Australia: Human Research Ethics Committee; United States: Institutional Review Board |
Arthroplasty, Knee, TKA, TKR, CAS, minimally invasive |
Musculoskeletal Diseases Osteoarthritis Joint Diseases Arthritis Rheumatic Diseases |
Musculoskeletal Diseases Osteoarthritis Joint Diseases Arthritis Rheumatic Diseases |