A cross-agency U.S. Government Web site. List of AIRNow partner agencies
About AIRNow | Contact Us | FAQs | Search:
Quality of Air Means Quality of Life AIRNow Home

National Overview
   Forecast
   Particles Now
   Ozone Now
   Action Days
   Archives
   International

   AQI Summary

About AIRNow

Partners
   For Partners
   List of Partners

Air Quality Basics
   Air Quality Index
   Ozone
   Particle Pollution
   UV

The AQI for...
   Health Providers
   Kids
   Students
   Older Adults
   Teachers
   Weathercasters

Key Topics:
   Your Health
   Smoke from Fires

Resources
   AQI in Google Earth
   Publications
   Publicaciones
   FAQs
   What You Can Do
   Movies
   NAQ Conferences
   About the Data

Contact Us
Privacy and Security Notice
Accessibility

 
Current Air Quality Conditions - Particles (PM2.5)

View Current Air Quality Conditions for Ozone.

Green  0 - 50

Good
 Yellow  51 - 100

Moderate
 Orange  101 - 150
Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
 Red  151 - 200

Unhealthy
 Purple  201 - 300

Very Unhealthy
 Maroon  301 - 500

Hazardous
 Action Day Action Day
click on the icon in city forecast area for more details

Location Current AQI Value
City / State Wed May 6
Aberdeen, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Acadia National Park, ME
Particles (PM2.5) 1 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Adams - Mt. Greylock, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Aiken-Augusta - SC/GA, GA
Particles (PM2.5) 41 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Aiken-Augusta - SC/GA, SC
Particles (PM2.5) 41 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Albany, NY
Particles (PM2.5) 9 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Albuquerque, NM
Particles (PM2.5) 31 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Amherst, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 19 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Asheville Valleys (below 4000 feet), NC
Particles (PM2.5) 20 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Atlanta, GA
Particles (PM2.5) 42 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Auburn, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 29 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Austin, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 53 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Bakersfield, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 24 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Baltimore, MD
Particles (PM2.5) 45 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Bangor, ME
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Banning, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 39 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Base - Whiteface Mountain, NY
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Baton Rouge Area, LA
Particles (PM2.5) 29 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 40 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Bellingham, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 9 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Bennington, VT
Particles (PM2.5) 21 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Benton Harbor, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 49 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Birmingham, AL
Particles (PM2.5) 50 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Boise, ID
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Boston, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 20 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Bremerton-Silverdale-Bainbridge Island, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 15 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Bridgeport, CT
Particles (PM2.5) 9 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Brownsville-McAllen, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 73 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Buffalo, NY
Particles (PM2.5) 25 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Burlington, VT
Particles (PM2.5) 37 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Cascade foothills of east King-Pierce counties, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Central LA CO, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Central Orange-1, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 16 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Central Orange-2, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 16 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Charleston, SC
Particles (PM2.5) 35 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Charlotte, NC
Particles (PM2.5) 32 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Chattanooga, TN
Particles (PM2.5) 26 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Chicago, IL
Particles (PM2.5) 80 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Chico, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 4 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Cincinnati, OH
Particles (PM2.5) 77 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Clarksville-Montgomery County, TN
Particles (PM2.5) 57 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, OH
Particles (PM2.5) 77 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Coeur d'Alene, ID
Particles (PM2.5) 10 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Colorado Springs, CO
Particles (PM2.5) 41 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Columbus, OH
Particles (PM2.5) 72 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Columbus-Phenix City - GA/AL, AL
Particles (PM2.5) 27 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Columbus-Phenix City - GA/AL, GA
Particles (PM2.5) 27 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Concord, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Corpus Christi, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 59 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 52 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Danbury, CT
Particles (PM2.5) 9 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Darrington, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 3 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Davis, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Dayton, OH
Particles (PM2.5) 53 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Denver, CO
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Des Moines, IA
Particles (PM2.5) 30 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Detroit, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 54 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Dona Ana County, NM
Particles (PM2.5) 41 No health impacts are expected in this range.
E San Fernando Vly, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 38 No health impacts are expected in this range.
E San Gabriel V-2, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 22 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Eastern U.P., MI
Particles (PM2.5) 44 No health impacts are expected in this range.
El Paso, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 32 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Elizabeth, NJ
Particles (PM2.5) 31 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Elk Grove, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 13 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Eugene/Springfield, OR
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Evansville, IN
Particles (PM2.5) 72 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Everett-Marysville-Lynnwood, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Fairfield, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Fairhaven, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Fall River, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Fayetteville, NC
Particles (PM2.5) 29 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Flint, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 42 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Florence/Darlington, SC
Particles (PM2.5) 35 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Folsom, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 13 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Fond du Lac, WI
Particles (PM2.5) 73 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Forsyth County-Winston-Salem-Greensboro-High Point, NC
Particles (PM2.5) 18 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Fort Collins - Greeley, CO
Particles (PM2.5) 18 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Fort Wayne, IN
Particles (PM2.5) 85 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Fremont, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 21 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Fresno, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 14 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Grand Rapids, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 48 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Great Smoky Mtns. Natl. Park - NC, TN
Particles (PM2.5) 35 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Green Bay, WI
Particles (PM2.5) 78 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Greenville-Spartanburg, SC
Particles (PM2.5) 39 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Gridley, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 10 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Hagerstown, MD
Particles (PM2.5) 45 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Hammond-Gary, IN
Particles (PM2.5) 50 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Hanford, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 10 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Hartford, CT
Particles (PM2.5) 16 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Haverhill, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 2 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Hickory, NC
Particles (PM2.5) 15 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Honolulu, HI
Particles (PM2.5) 34 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Houghton Lake, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 38 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 66 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Indianapolis, IN
Particles (PM2.5) 64 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Jacksonville, FL
Particles (PM2.5) 26 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Kalamazoo, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 49 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Kansas City, MO
Particles (PM2.5) 37 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Keene, NH
Particles (PM2.5) 10 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Knoxville, TN
Particles (PM2.5) 35 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Kona, HI
Particles (PM2.5) 76 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
La Crosse, WI
Particles (PM2.5) 27 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Lake Charles, LA
Particles (PM2.5) 42 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Lake Elsinore, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Lansing, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 41 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Las Vegas, NV
Particles (PM2.5) 35 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Lawton, OK
Particles (PM2.5) 41 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Lehigh Valley, PA
Particles (PM2.5) 16 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Lewiston, ID
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Lexington, KY
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Liberty/Clairton area, PA
Particles (PM2.5) 50 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR
Particles (PM2.5) 9 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Livermore, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Lompoc, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 3 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Louisville, KY
Particles (PM2.5) 57 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Ludington, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 38 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Lynn, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Macon, GA
Particles (PM2.5) 38 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Madison, WI
Particles (PM2.5) 77 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Manchester, NH
Particles (PM2.5) 7 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Memphis, TN
Particles (PM2.5) 40 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Metro Riverside CO, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Miami, FL
Particles (PM2.5) 39 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Midland-Odessa, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 56 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Millington, MD
Particles (PM2.5) 12 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Millville, NJ
Particles (PM2.5) 19 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Milton - Blue Hill Observatory, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 11 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Milwaukee, WI
Particles (PM2.5) 73 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN
Particles (PM2.5) 69 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Mississippi Gulf Coast, MS
Particles (PM2.5) 37 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Modesto, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 15 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Mount Vernon, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 9 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Mountain View, HI
Particles (PM2.5) 23 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Napa, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 14 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Narragansett, RI
Particles (PM2.5) 13 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Nashua, NH
Particles (PM2.5) 7 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Nashville, TN
Particles (PM2.5) 42 No health impacts are expected in this range.
New Haven, CT
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
New Jersey(Southern), NJ
Particles (PM2.5) 19 No health impacts are expected in this range.
New Orleans, LA
Particles (PM2.5) 36 No health impacts are expected in this range.
New York City, NY
Particles (PM2.5) 25 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Newark, NJ
Particles (PM2.5) 31 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Newbury, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Niagara Falls, NY
Particles (PM2.5) 31 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Northern Virginia, VA
Particles (PM2.5) 55 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Oakland, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 20 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Oakridge, OR
Particles (PM2.5) 10 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Ojai, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 20 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Oklahoma City, OK
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Omaha, NE
Particles (PM2.5) 23 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Orlando, FL
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Oxnard, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 20 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Pahala, HI
Particles (PM2.5) 40 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Paradise, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 24 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Pensacola, FL
Particles (PM2.5) 43 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Peoria, IL
Particles (PM2.5) 64 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Philadelphia, PA
Particles (PM2.5) 34 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Phoenix, AZ
Particles (PM2.5) 42 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Piru, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 16 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Pittsburgh, PA
Particles (PM2.5) 50 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Pittsfield, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 14 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Pocatello, ID
Particles (PM2.5) 6 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Port Angeles, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 18 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Port Townsend, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 18 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Portland, OR
Particles (PM2.5) 14 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Portsmouth, NH
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Presque Isle, ME
Particles (PM2.5) 18 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Providence, RI
Particles (PM2.5) 11 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Racine-Kenosha, WI
Particles (PM2.5) 74 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC
Particles (PM2.5) 20 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Redding, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 2 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Redwood City, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 21 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Richmond, VA
Particles (PM2.5) 21 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Rochester, MN
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Rockford, IL
Particles (PM2.5) 56 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Roseville-Rocklin, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 29 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Sacramento, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 29 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Saginaw, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 42 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Saint Louis, MO
Particles (PM2.5) 59 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Salt Lake City, UT
Particles (PM2.5) 17 No health impacts are expected in this range.
San Antonio, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 46 No health impacts are expected in this range.
San Diego Coast, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 29 No health impacts are expected in this range.
San Diego Foothills, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 30 No health impacts are expected in this range.
San Diego Mesa and Inland Valley, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 18 No health impacts are expected in this range.
San Francisco, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 20 No health impacts are expected in this range.
San Gabriel Mts, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 44 No health impacts are expected in this range.
San Jose, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 15 No health impacts are expected in this range.
San Juan County, NM
Particles (PM2.5) 19 No health impacts are expected in this range.
San Rafael, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 14 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Santa Barbara, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Santa Clarita Vly, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 44 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Santa Maria, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 3 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Santa Rosa, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 14 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Sarasota, FL
Particles (PM2.5) 44 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Seattle-Bellevue-Kent Valley, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 12 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Sheboygan, WI
Particles (PM2.5) 72 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Shelton, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 17 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Simi Valley, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 21 No health impacts are expected in this range.
South Bend, IN
Particles (PM2.5) 73 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
South Coastal LA, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 14 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Springfield, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Springfield, MO
Particles (PM2.5) 44 No health impacts are expected in this range.
St. Petersburg, FL
Particles (PM2.5) 24 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Susquehanna Valley, PA
Particles (PM2.5) 61 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Tacoma-Puyallup, WA
Particles (PM2.5) 9 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Tampa, FL
Particles (PM2.5) 37 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Temecula Vly, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Terre Haute, IN
Particles (PM2.5) 88 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Thibodaux, LA
Particles (PM2.5) 36 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Thousand Oaks, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 15 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Traverse City, MI
Particles (PM2.5) 38 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Tri-Cities, TN
Particles (PM2.5) 21 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Tulsa, OK
Particles (PM2.5) 56 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Twin Falls, ID
Particles (PM2.5) 13 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Tyler-Longview-Marshall, TX
Particles (PM2.5) 29 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Utica, NY
Particles (PM2.5) 12 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Vineland, NJ
Particles (PM2.5) 19 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Visalia, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 18 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Ware - Quabbin Summit, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 19 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Washington, DC
Particles (PM2.5) 55 Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
West Greenwich, RI
Particles (PM2.5) 10 No health impacts are expected in this range.
West Palm Beach, FL
Particles (PM2.5) 28 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Winchester, VA
Particles (PM2.5) 19 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Woodland, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 8 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Worcester, MA
Particles (PM2.5) 9 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Youngstown, OH
Particles (PM2.5) 42 No health impacts are expected in this range.
Yuba City/Marysville, CA
Particles (PM2.5) 1 No health impacts are expected in this range.
 
AIRNow is a government-backed program. Through AIRNow, EPA, NOAA, NPS, news media, tribal, state, and local agencies work together to report conditions for ozone and particle pollution. State, Local and Tribal Partners.
EPA Home NOAA-National WeatherService NASA Langley Research Center National Park Service Air Resources National Association of Clean Air Agencies Environment Canada
EPA Home NOAA-National
Weather Service 		NASA
Earth Science 		National Park Service
Air Resources 		National Association
of Clean Air Agencies 		Environment Canada