Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by: |
Columbia University |
---|---|
Information provided by: | Columbia University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00868998 |
This is a study for patients with advanced cancer of the biliary tree, such as cholangiocarcinoma. They will be treated with a chemotherapy regimen consisting of Gemcitabine, Taxotere, and Xeloda every 21 days for at least 9 weeks. Treatment will continue until their cancer progresses. This chemotherapy regimen has been used in pancreatic cancer and there is reason to believe that it will be effective for cancers of the biliary tree as well.
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Biliary Cancer |
Drug: Gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine |
Phase II |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Treatment, Non-Randomized, Open Label, Single Group Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | Phase II Study of a Biochemically Synergistic Regimen for Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Biliary Tree With Gemzar, Taxotere and Xeloda (GTX) |
Estimated Enrollment: | 43 |
Study Start Date: | August 2005 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2010 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
The evolution of the protocol regimen, consisting of Gemzar, Taxotere and Xeloda (oral pro-drug of 5FU) (GTX), was carefully developed over the past three years from laboratory and clinical work. Initially, in collaboration with Dr. William Sherman of the Division of Medical Oncology we assessed the clinical effects of two agents, Gemzar and docetaxel in pancreatic cancer patients. In our in vitro studies we found that as single agents these drugs (Gemzar and docetaxel) were minimally effective against pancreatic carcinoma lines, which expressed mutant p53 and activated mutated ras. Constitutively active mutant ras is found in approximately 95% of all pancreatic carcinomas. However, when the agents were added together in tissue culture experiments we found that their activity was additive. The clinical study performed at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center demonstrated a 27% objective response rate by CT scan including one complete response with intent to treat analysis of all 15 patients within the study. The majority of these patients had metastatic liver disease and a minority had inoperable pancreatic carcinoma without liver metastases. Though this was a small single arm, single institution study it did suggest a trend towards improved responses in patients with this disease when these two agents were combined. In addition, valuable lessons were learned from the in vitro work with Gemzar and docetaxel. Importantly, we found that this combination was equally toxic to mutant and wild type p53 pancreatic cancer cells, as well as to cells with mutant ras. Also, docetaxel pharmacokinetics is more favorable and has distinct advantages over the use of the other taxane known as paclitaxel. They are the following: 1) Taxotere, or docetaxel, enters tumor cells more efficiently than paclitaxel because it is more lipophilic; 2) Taxotere is not pumped out by the cell by P-glycoprotein as efficiently as paclitaxel; 3) Taxotere's half life was significantly longer than that of paclitaxel such that a 60 minute infusion of Taxotere gives you approximately the same pharmacokinetics as a 24 hour continuous infusion of paclitaxel. These laboratory studies from the literature formed the rationale for our use of Taxotere (docetaxel) instead of paclitaxel.
After our initial clinical and laboratory study we went back to the laboratory to investigate further some of the properties of gemcitabine, docetaxel added to 5FU in vitro to maximize biochemical synergy and to minimize toxicity. We found important characteristics of these drug combinations against pancreatic cancer cells that have been synthesized into the current protocol. We found that there was sequence specificity for these drugs in that 5FU should precede Gemzar by 72 to 96 hours and Gemzar should be added before docetaxel to achieve maximum synergy. Docetaxel cytotoxicity was dose dependent up to 20 nM but then no further cell kill was obtained past that point. This could mean that one would not need to use high dose docetaxel in a regimen because it would be doubtful whether increased doses would obtain further cell kill in a linear scale. We investigated many different combinations of these 3 agents in the laboratory to determine the best combination to achieve biochemical synergy while decreasing the concentration of each drug and not lose antitumor effect so as to decrease toxicity to patients.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
The following lesions conventionally are not considered measurable:
CNS lesions Blastic or lytic bone lesions (which should be documented and followed) Radiated lesions unless progression after RT is documented
>3 weeks since surgery or last chemotherapy >4 weeks since RT
Absolute Neutrophil Count > 1,500ul White Blood Count ≥ 3,000/ul Platelet count > 100,000/ul BUN < 1.5 x ULN Creatinine < 1.5 x ULN Hemoglobin > 8.0 g/dl Serum Albumin > 2.5 mg/dl Total Bilirubin < 4.0 SGOT ≤ 4.0 x ULN SGPT ≤ 4.0 x ULN Alkaline Phosphatase ≤ 4.0 x ULN
Exclusion Criteria:
Therefore, HIV-positive patients are excluded from the study.
Contact: Vilma Rosario | 212-305-2666 | vr2222@columbia.edu |
Contact: Dawn Tsushima, RN | 212-305-1921 | dt2288@columbia.edu |
United States, New York | |
Columbia University Medical Center | Recruiting |
New York, New York, United States, 10032 | |
Contact: Vilma Rosario 212-305-2666 vr2222@columbia.edu |
Principal Investigator: | Robert L Fine, MD | Columbia University Medical Center |
Responsible Party: | Columbia University Medical Center ( Robert L. Fine M.D. ) |
Study ID Numbers: | AAAB3329 |
Study First Received: | March 23, 2009 |
Last Updated: | April 20, 2009 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00868998 History of Changes |
Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Dexamethasone Antimetabolites Capecitabine Biliary Tract Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Immunologic Factors Immunosuppressive Agents Antiviral Agents Docetaxel |
Digestive System Diseases Radiation-Sensitizing Agents Biliary Tract Diseases Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Biliary Tract Cancer Adenocarcinoma Gemcitabine Dexamethasone acetate |
Antimetabolites Anti-Infective Agents Capecitabine Biliary Tract Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic Immunologic Factors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Antineoplastic Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Enzyme Inhibitors |
Immunosuppressive Agents Antiviral Agents Pharmacologic Actions Docetaxel Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Digestive System Diseases Radiation-Sensitizing Agents Therapeutic Uses Biliary Tract Diseases Gemcitabine |