![]() |
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored by: |
Microlife |
---|---|
Information provided by: | Microlife |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00502931 |
With the number of individuals becoming overweight or obese, healthcare professionals are in need of accurate, reliable, and convenient tools to help personalize weight loss programs. Recently, a new indirect calorimeter (i.e. MedGem / BodyGem; aka “Gem”) was introduced as a convenient solution to determine resting metabolic rate (RMR) for assessment of daily energy needs. Several validation and comparison studies were conducted to determine if the Gem device is accurate and reliable. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of previous studies that evaluated the accuracy and reliability of the Gem devices.
Condition |
---|
Resting Metabolic Rate |
Study Type: | Observational |
Study Design: | Screening, Longitudinal, Case Control, Retrospective Study |
Official Title: | A Systematic Review on the Accuracy and Reliability of a Hand-Held Indirect Calorimeter for Assessing Energy Needs in Adults & Children |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Inclusion Criteria:
Study ID Numbers: | ML003 |
Study First Received: | July 16, 2007 |
Last Updated: | July 16, 2007 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00502931 History of Changes |
Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |