Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by: |
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation |
---|---|
Information provided by: | Robert Wood Johnson Foundation |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00102401 |
The overall goal of this study is to compare the impact of a new Internet Dyspnea Self-Management Program (eDSMP) with an established face-to-face Dyspnea Self-Management Program (DSMP) in patients with COPD. The primary aim of the study is to test the following two hypotheses: 1. The eDSMP and the DSMP will have comparable improvements in the primary outcomes of shortness of breath (dyspnea) with activities of daily living (ADL), exercise adherence and performance, and pulmonary exacerbations (frequency and duration) at 3 and 6 months. 2. The eDSMP and the DSMP will have comparable improvements in the secondary outcomes of perception of support, self-efficacy for exercise and managing dyspnea, and health resource utilization at 3 and 6 months. This study is a randomized, longitudinal, repeated measures design with measurement times at 0, 3, and 6 months.
Condition | Intervention |
---|---|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
Behavioral: Internet-based Dyspnea Self-Management Program Behavioral: Face-to-face Dyspnea Self-Management Program |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | Comparing the Effects of an Internet-Based to an Established Dyspnea Self-Management Program on Dyspnea, Exercise Behavior, and Pulmonary Exacerbations in Patients With COPD |
Enrollment: | 50 |
Study Start Date: | September 2003 |
Study Completion Date: | June 2007 |
Despite optimal medical treatment, people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue to experience dyspnea or shortness of breath. This study will evaluate two different ways to provide education and support to help patients manage their shortness of breath. One program will be conducted in a face-to-face setting and a second through the Internet. The main difference between the two programs is the way they are administered. The education, exercise, and monitoring components are the same. The overall goal of this study is to find out whether the two programs are comparable in their effect on shortness of breath (dyspnea) with activities of daily living, exercise adherence and performance, and pulmonary exacerbations (frequency and duration) at 3 and 6 months. Perception of support, self-efficacy for exercise and managing dyspnea, and health resource utilization will also be measured at 3 and 6 months. This study is a randomized, longitudinal, repeated measures design with measurement times at 0, 3, and 6 months.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 40 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
United States, California | |
University of California | |
San Francisco, California, United States, 94143-0610 | |
United States, Washington | |
University of Washington | |
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195-7266 |
Principal Investigator: | Virginia Carrieri-Kohlman, RN DNSc | University of California, San Francisco |
Principal Investigator: | Huong Q Nguyen, RN PhD | University of Washington |
Study ID Numbers: | 49153 |
Study First Received: | January 29, 2005 |
Last Updated: | August 13, 2007 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00102401 History of Changes |
Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Pulmonary Disease, chronic obstructive Lung disease, obstructive |
Self-care Self-management Patient education |
Lung Diseases, Obstructive Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases |
Respiration Disorders Dyspnea Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
Lung Diseases, Obstructive Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases Respiration Disorders Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |