Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by: |
University of California, Irvine |
---|---|
Information provided by: | University of California, Irvine |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00256282 |
Annually in the U.S. there is an estimated 40,000 new cases of malignant melanoma and 7000 deaths. This disease is becoming more common with its incidence increasing at a more rapid rate in the past decade than that of any other cancer except lung cancer in women. Metastatic disease responds poorly to the usual treatments with only 2 out of 30 drugs tested, DTIC and nitrosoureas, showing response rates greater than 10%. Complete responses are rare.
Metastatic melanoma is a disease with few therapeutic options. Multi-agent chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP), Dacarbazine (DTIC), Carmustine (BCNU), with or without Tamoxifen, offers a 20% response rate but has failed to consistently demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) when compared to a single agent DTIC.
Recently, investigators, in an effort to combine the activity of biologic response modifiers with chemotherapy, have developed combination biochemotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Legha et al reported an overall objective response rate of 64% with a 5-day biochemotherapy regimen. O'Day et al reported similar results (overall response rate of 57%) using a modified 5-day biochemotherapy regimen.
The above regimens all have significant toxicities and modest response rates. Clearly, more effective less toxic regimens are needed.
Vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine) and Docetaxel (Taxotere) have both shown activity against melanoma. Additionally, the combination of both drugs has shown enhanced activity against melanoma.
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Metastatic Melanoma |
Drug: Vinorelbine Drug: Docetaxel Drug: Sargramostim |
Phase II |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Treatment, Non-Randomized, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | A Phase II Evaluation of Docetaxel and Vinorelbine Plus Sargramostim in Patients With Malignant Melanoma |
Estimated Enrollment: | 60 |
Study Start Date: | April 2003 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2009 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Laboratory values (performed in 14 days, inclusive prior to study drug administration):
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact: Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California, Irvine Medical Center | 1-877-UC-STUDY | UCstudy@uci.edu |
United States, California | |
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center | Recruiting |
Orange, California, United States, 92868 | |
Principal Investigator: John Fruehauf, MD |
Principal Investigator: | John Fruehauf, MD | Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center |
Responsible Party: | University of California, Irvine Medical Center ( John Fruehauf, MD ) |
Study ID Numbers: | UCI 02-23 |
Study First Received: | November 17, 2005 |
Last Updated: | February 12, 2009 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00256282 History of Changes |
Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Metastatic Melanoma |
Docetaxel Neuroectodermal Tumors Vinorelbine Nevus, Pigmented Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
Neuroepithelioma Nevus Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic Neuroendocrine Tumors Melanoma |
Neoplasms by Histologic Type Antineoplastic Agents Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue Pharmacologic Actions Melanoma Neuroendocrine Tumors Docetaxel |
Neuroectodermal Tumors Neoplasms Vinorelbine Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal Therapeutic Uses Nevi and Melanomas Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic |