Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Mobius® Post-Cesarean Pain Randomized Control Trial
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, December 2008
First Received: May 26, 2008   Last Updated: December 17, 2008   History of Changes
Sponsors and Collaborators: Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Apple Medical Corporation
Information provided by: Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00685932
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the use of the Mobius® retractor decreased post-operative pain after cesarean section verses conventional retractor use. Based on clinical experience and a pilot study, we suspect that the retractor will decrease overall pain as well as lateral pain.


Condition Intervention Phase
Cesarean Section
Pregnancy
Device: Mobius Retractor
Phase IV

MedlinePlus related topics: Cesarean Section
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Active Control, Parallel Assignment
Official Title: Mobius Pain Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Standard Versus Mobius® Retraction at Cesarean Delivery

Further study details as provided by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Primary outcome measure if decreased overall post- cesarean section pain in the Mobius arm of the study. [ Time Frame: 3 days post-operatiion ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Secondarily we will examine if the Mobius retractor decreases asymmetrical pain which is significantly more common in cesarean section patients versus vaginal delivery patients. [ Time Frame: 3 days post-operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 125
Study Start Date: July 2008
Estimated Study Completion Date: July 2009
Estimated Primary Completion Date: July 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Control: No Intervention
This arm will be randomly assigned to have conventional retractions (ie Rich retractors and similar) used in the usual fashion during the cesarean procedure.
Mobius: Experimental
This arm will be randomized to have the providers who are performing the cesarean section use the Mobius retractor during the cesarean section procedure after the peritoneal cavity is opened.
Device: Mobius Retractor
The Mobius retractor is a dual ring elastic self retaining retractor that is inserted into the abdominal cavity after the peritoneal incision has been established. It is then left in place during the hysterotomy incision, delivery of the fetus, hysterotomy repair, inspection and irrigation.

Detailed Description:

This is a prospective, randomized, patient blinded trial of standard surgical retraction versus Mobius® retraction at cesarean delivery. Women will be approached by their provider at their 36 week prenatal visit regarding potential study participation. They will be given a letter describing the study.

If a woman is interested, she will be contacted by a study nurse who will obtain informed consent. Ideally, women will be approached prior to the onset of labor or date of scheduled cesarean delivery so as to provide adequate time to review the study and ask questions. Women who undergo antenatal admission will be also approached by their provider regarding possible study participation and given a recruitment letter. If they are interested, then a study nurse will obtain informed consent.

Consenting women will be randomized after the decision to deliver by cesarean section is made. Randomization will be performed in blocks to control for scheduled versus unscheduled cesarean deliveries using a random numbers generator. Assignments will be kept in sequentially number opaque envelopes.

Women will not be informed of their assignment until after discharge from the hospital. Efforts will be made in the operating room to avoid disclosing group assignment and the consent forms will not contain the specific name of the retractor under study. The operative team will be aware of group assignment.

Participants will complete a 7 item pain scale each post-operative day until discharge. This pain scale has been used in a pilot study and found to be accurate. The pain scale is a single page and takes less than 5 minutes to complete.

Charts will be reviewed to obtain clinical information which may have an impact on post-operative pain. This includes information about current and past substance abuse. Because of the increased amounts of post-operative pain experienced by women who use methadone during pregnancy, this group of women will be excluded from the study. To protect the information regarding substance abuse, a certificate of confidentiality has been obtained from the NIH.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years old
  • Potential for having a cesarean section (scheduled or unscheduled) at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years old
  • Unable to consent due to language barrier or psychiatric illness
  • Current methadone use for chronic pain
  • Stat cesarean section
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00685932

Contacts
Contact: Michele Lauria, MD, MS 603-653-9302 michele.lauria@hitchcock.org
Contact: Abbey J Hardy-Fairbanks, MD 603-653-9302 abshf@hitchcock.org

Locations
United States, New Hampshire
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Recruiting
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
Contact: Michele Lauria, MD, MS     603-653-9303     michele.lauria@hitchcock.org    
Contact: Abbey J Hardy-Fairbanks, MD     603-650-9302     abshf@hitchcock.org    
Principal Investigator: Abbey J Hardy-Fairbanks, MD            
Principal Investigator: Michele Lauria, MD, MS            
Sponsors and Collaborators
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Apple Medical Corporation
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Michele Lauria, MD, MS Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  More Information

Additional Information:
Publications:
Rafique Z, Shibli KU, Russell IF, Lindow SW. A randomised controlled trial of the closure or non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: effect on post-operative pain. BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):694-8.
Chanrachakul B, Hamontri S, Herabutya Y. A randomized comparison of postcesarean pain between closure and nonclosure of peritoneum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Feb 10;101(1):31-5.
Giacalone PL, Daures JP, Vignal J, Herisson C, Hedon B, Laffargue F. Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;99(5 Pt 1):745-50.
Kadir RA, Khan A, Wilcock F, Chapman L. Is inferior dissection of the rectus sheath necessary during Pfannenstiel incision for lower segment Caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Sep-Oct;128(1-2):262-6. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
Nafisi S. Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-Cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007 Apr;16(2):135-8. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
Dunn EA, O'Herlihy C. Comparison of maternal satisfaction following vaginal delivery after caesarean section and caesarean section after previous vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Jul 1;121(1):56-60.
Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D, Tamir A, Zimmer EZ. Postcesarean section pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jun;98(6):1422-6.
Pan PH, Coghill R, Houle TT, Seid MH, Lindel WM, Parker RL, Washburn SA, Harris L, Eisenach JC. Multifactorial preoperative predictors for postcesarean section pain and analgesic requirement. Anesthesiology. 2006 Mar;104(3):417-25.
Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, Ellwood DA. Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth. 2002 Jun;29(2):83-94.
Dodd J, Pearce E, Crowther C. Women's experiences and preferences following Caesarean birth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Dec;44(6):521-4.
McCarthy M Jr, Chang CH, Pickard AS, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price DD, Jonasson O, Gibbs J, Fitzgibbons R, Neumayer L. Visual analog scales for assessing surgical pain. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Aug;201(2):245-52. Erratum in: J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Nov;201(5):826.

Responsible Party: Dartmout-Hitchcock Medical Center ( Michele Lauria, MD, MS )
Study ID Numbers: 21107
Study First Received: May 26, 2008
Last Updated: December 17, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00685932     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center:
Cesarean section
Postpartum pain
Post-cesarean pain
Surgical retractor
Elastic retractor

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Pain

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 07, 2009