Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsors and Collaborators: |
University of Southern California University of the Pacific Orthopaedic Section, American Physical Therapy Association |
---|---|
Information provided by: | University of Southern California |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00847769 |
The purpose of this study is to determine changes in the brain associated with improvement in ankle range of motion following ankle manual therapy procedures in individuals with post-acute ankle sprains
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Ankle Sprain |
Other: High velocity, low amplitude stretch Other: Slow, mobilization stretch Other: Passive Positioning |
Phase I Phase II |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Basic Science, Randomized, Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | Effect of Manual Therapy Intervention on Corticospinal Excitability in Individuals With Post-Acute Ankle Sprains |
Estimated Enrollment: | 27 |
Study Start Date: | December 2008 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2009 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | August 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
High velocity, low amplitude stretch: Experimental
With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. A thrust will be delivered parallel to the long axis of the subject's lower leg after the treating therapist induces passive ankle dorsiflexion to end range.
|
Other: High velocity, low amplitude stretch
This group (n=9) will receive talocrural traction manipulation. With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. A thrust will be delivered parallel to the long axis of the subject's lower leg after the treating therapist induces passive ankle dorsiflexion to end range.
|
Slow, mobilization stretch: Active Comparator
With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. Traction will be delivered to the talocrural joint at the treating therapist's second perception of tissue resistance in 3 bouts of 30-second holds, separated by 10 seconds of rest.
|
Other: Slow, mobilization stretch
This group (n=9) will receive talocrural traction mobilization. With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. Traction will be delivered to the talocrural joint at the treating investigator's second perception of tissue resistance in 3 bouts of 30-second holds, separated by 10 seconds of rest.
|
Passive positioning: Sham Comparator
With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface, which is similar to the positioning used for the active comparator groups. The treating investigator will maintain passive positioning of the ankle for the duration of 1 deep inhalation and exhalation by the subject rather than induce an iatrogenic force.
|
Other: Passive Positioning
This group (n=9) will receive the manual therapy control intervention. This will consist of the same patient and clinician preparation for the mobilization/manipulation techniques. However, a single standardized treating investigator will simply maintain passive ankle positioning for the duration of 1 deep inhalation and exhalation by the subject rather than induce an iatrogenic force characteristic of the intervention received by the other 2 comparison groups.
|
Physical therapists use many ways to treat joints that do not move well. One way takes 1-2 seconds. Another way may take up to 1 minute. Both stretches seem to work, but we do not know how. Certain changes in the brain and spinal cord may cause joints to become more flexible after these kinds of stretches. Right now, we do not have very much information about how these might work in people who have injured their ankle. This study will find out if changes in the brain cause better flexibility in the ankle joint after different kinds of stretches. In this study, subjects with a certain kind of ankle sprains and limited ankle joint flexibility will be assigned to 1 out of 3 groups. Subjects will not get to choose their groups. The first group will have an ankle stretch that lasts 1-2 seconds. The second group will have a stretch that last 1 minute. The third group will have their foot held without any stretching. We will use a machine to stimulate the brain and spinal cord to find out how these stretches affect the brain and spinal cord. The machine sends a magnetic signal to the brain, and we will measure how much signal gets through to the leg muscles using electrodes on the skin. We also will use 3 flexibility tests to find out how well each stretch worked. One test is with the subject lying on their stomach, and the others are with the subject standing up. To start the study, subjects will get their brain stimulated. They will then get their brain stimulated again one hour later. After the second stimulation, subjects will have their flexibility tested and then get 1 of the 3 treatments. After the treatment, subjects will get a last brain stimulation test and flexibility tests. We think subjects that get a fast stretch will have better brain function and flexibility than subjects that get the slow stretch or no stretch. To test our idea, we will compare how each group did with the brain stimulation and flexibility tests. We will also look at the relationship between brain function and flexibility.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 60 Years |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact: Beth E Fisher, PhD, PT | bfisher@usc.edu | |
Contact: Todd E Davenport, DPT, OCS | (209) 946-3159 | tdavenport@pacific.edu |
United States, California | |
University of Southern California | Recruiting |
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90089 | |
Contact: Beth E Fisher, PhD, PT bfisher@usc.edu | |
Contact: Todd E Davenport, DPT, OCS (209) 946-3159 tdavenport@pacific.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Beth E Fisher, PhD, PT | |
Sub-Investigator: Todd E Davenport, DPT, OCS | |
Sub-Investigator: Kornelia Kulig, PhD, PT |
Principal Investigator: | Beth E Fisher, PhD, PT | University of Southern California |
Study Director: | Todd E Davenport, DPT, OCS | University of the Pacific |
Responsible Party: | University of Southern California ( Beth Fisher ) |
Study ID Numbers: | HS-08-00192 |
Study First Received: | January 22, 2009 |
Last Updated: | February 17, 2009 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00847769 History of Changes |
Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Ankle Sprain |
Benzocaine Wounds and Injuries Disorders of Environmental Origin Sprains and Strains |
Wounds and Injuries Disorders of Environmental Origin Sprains and Strains |