Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Effectiveness of Auto-Adjusted Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Long-Term Treatment of Sleep Apnea
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by University of Zurich, July 2008
First Received: January 20, 2006   Last Updated: July 31, 2008   History of Changes
Sponsors and Collaborators: University of Zurich
Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Switzerland
Zürcher Höhenklinik Wald, Switzerland
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Information provided by: University of Zurich
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00280800
  Purpose

Hypothesis: Auto continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is equally effective in improving obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) symptoms, breathing disturbances, objective vigilance, and it is cost-effective compared to conventional fixed CPAP.


Condition Intervention
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
Device: constant CPAP devices
Device: automatic CPAP devices

MedlinePlus related topics: Sleep Apnea
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: Effectiveness of Auto-Adjusted Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Long-Term Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Further study details as provided by University of Zurich:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • subjective sleepiness and other OSAS symptoms [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • quality of life [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • percentage of withdrawal and cross-over to other CPAP mode [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • objective vigilance [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • blood pressure [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • cost/utility ratios [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • major outcomes in subgroups of patients with severe and mild OSAS [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • circulating markers of inflammation and cardiovascular risk [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • side effects [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • nocturnal respiratory disturbances [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • treatment adherence [ Time Frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 150
Study Start Date: January 2006
Estimated Study Completion Date: January 2010
Estimated Primary Completion Date: January 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Active Comparator
constant CPAP
Device: constant CPAP devices
different CPAP mode
2: Experimental
automatic CPAP
Device: automatic CPAP devices
different CPAP mode

Detailed Description:
  1. To investigate whether auto CPAP improves subjective sleepiness, quality of life, objective vigilance, and nocturnal respiration to a similar degree as conventional fixed CPAP in the initial phase of treatment and over the subsequent 2 years during home therapy
  2. To investigate the cost of auto CPAP compared to fixed CPAP therapy
  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 75 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Excessive sleepiness, and Epworth Sleepiness Score > or = 8
  • Apnea- Hypopnea-Index (AHI) > or = 10/hour
  • Age 18-75

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychophysiological incapacity to perform questionnaires
  • Other sleep disorders
  • Psychiatric disease requiring treatment
  • Previous CPAP therapy
  • Previous uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
  • Chronic nasal obstruction that required treatment for more than 1 month
  • Cancer
  • COPD, with FEV1 < 50% predicted
  • Symptomatic cardiovascular disease requiring treatment defined as congestive heart failure > NYHA II
  • Previous stroke with neurological residuum
  • Cheyne-Stokes respiration
  • Chronic pain syndromes, fibromyalgia
  • Drug or alcohol addiction
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00280800

Contacts
Contact: Konrad E Bloch, MD 41-44-255-2202 pneubloc@usz.uzh.ch
Contact: Yvonne Nussbaumer, MD 41-44-255-1111 Yvonne.Nussbaumer-Ochsener@usz.ch

Locations
Switzerland
Pulmonary Division and Sleep Disorders Center, University Hospital of Zurich Recruiting
Zürich, Switzerland, CH-8091
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Zurich
Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Switzerland
Zürcher Höhenklinik Wald, Switzerland
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Investigators
Study Chair: Konrad E Bloch, MD Pulmonary Division and Sleep Disorders Center, University Hospital of Zürich, Switzerland
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: University Hospital Zurich ( Konrad E. Bloch, MD )
Study ID Numbers: EK 1187
Study First Received: January 20, 2006
Last Updated: July 31, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00280800     History of Changes
Health Authority: Switzerland: Swissmedic

Keywords provided by University of Zurich:
randomized
controlled
double blind
effectiveness
auto CPAP
treatment
sleep apnea

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Signs and Symptoms
Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Apnea
Respiration Disorders
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
Dyssomnias
Sleep Disorders
Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Signs and Symptoms
Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Apnea
Nervous System Diseases
Respiration Disorders
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
Sleep Disorders
Dyssomnias
Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 07, 2009