Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Intranasal Administration of Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate for Bowel Evacuation (IN NEO)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Department of Veterans Affairs, March 2009
First Received: March 2, 2009   Last Updated: March 3, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsored by: Department of Veterans Affairs
Information provided by: Department of Veterans Affairs
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00855283
  Purpose

DWE (difficulty with evacuation) is a common and an important quality of life issue after spinal cord injury. Not only is the management DWE time-consuming and unpleasant, but the results are often suboptimal in terms of complications such as incontinence and impaction. Bowel care regimens after spinal cord injury have not changed in any significant fashion in many years. The usual strategies for attaining bowel evacuation involve dietary manipulation (e.g., high fiber diets and hydration), thrice weekly laxative administration (senna and cascara) and thrice weekly anorectal instillation of cathartics (enemas and suppositories). Bowel care can be quite time consuming (greater than 2 hours in many instances) and may also require extensive nursing care. Finally, incomplete evacuation could contribute to fecal incontinence that has significant morbidity in these patients.

In preliminary studies performed at the JJPVAMC, IV, IM, and subcutaneous injection of neostigmine combined with glycopyrrolate were demonstrated to be highly effective to promote bowel evacuation in the SCI population. In an effort to provide a more realistic administration of this procedure, we propose to test the intranasal spray injection of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate for safety and efficacy.


Condition Intervention Phase
SCI
Drug: IN NEO
Drug: IN NEO + IN Glycopyrrolate
Drug: IN Glycopyrrolate + IN NEO
Phase II

MedlinePlus related topics: Diets
Drug Information available for: Neostigmine Methylsulfate Phenylephrine Neostigmine Phenylephrine hydrochloride Neostigmine bromide Glycopyrrolate Oxymetazoline Oxymetazoline hydrochloride
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Open Label, Single Group Assignment, Pharmacokinetics/Dynamics Study
Official Title: Intranasal Administration of Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate for Bowel Evacuation

Further study details as provided by Department of Veterans Affairs:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Bowel evacuation [ Time Frame: <60 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Estimated Enrollment: 20
Study Start Date: February 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: February 2011
Estimated Primary Completion Date: February 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Experimental
SCI
Drug: IN NEO
20 mg Neostigmine via intranasal administration
Drug: IN NEO
40 mg Neostigmine via intranasal administration
Drug: IN NEO
60 mg Neostigmine via intranasal administration
Drug: IN NEO + IN Glycopyrrolate
Intranasal Neostigmine (at effective dose: 20, 40, or 60 mg) + 4-12 mg intranasal Glycopyyrolate
Drug: IN Glycopyrrolate + IN NEO
4-12 mg intranasal Glycopyyrolate + intranasal Neostigmine (at effective dose: 20, 40, or 60 mg)

Detailed Description:

We have been studying the effects of spinal cord injury on the bowel for over ten years. Our data suggests that one of the fundamental consequences of spinal cord injury is a slowing of intestinal peristaltic activity, most likely as a result of down regulation of parasympathetic neural pathways.

Furthermore, measures that increase parasympathetic stimulation to the bowel result in bowel evacuation and improve bowel care. In this respect, significant acute effects have been demonstrated after the intravenous administration of the cholinergic agent neostigmine (Am J Gastro 100:1560-5, 2005). Long term efficacy has also been shown using intramuscular administration of neostigmine (Gastro 128:P258, 2005). Subcutaneous administration of neostigmine is in progress at this time. Bowel evacuation also is facilitated by subcutaneous administration but often requires a second dose (30 minutes after the first). This observation is likely due to a decreased rate of absorption from this tissue compartment and a correspondingly lower peak level of neostigmine (vide infra). Given the potential cardiopulmonary toxicity of neostigmine (bradycardia and bronchoconstriction), neostigmine was administered in these studies in combination with the anticholinergic agent glycopyrrolate. We have reported that the latter selectively blocks the cardiopulmonary side effects of neostigmine without significantly decreasing the prokinetic peristaltic response. In summary, our data to date indicates that the combined administration of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate is safe after spinal cord damage and it results in predicable and prompt bowel evacuation.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Incomplete or complete SCI
  2. Tetraplegia or paraplegia
  3. Males or females
  4. Age 18 (no upper age limit)
  5. Excess time for bowel evacuation (> 60 minutes per bowel training session)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Persons with SCI who do not require do not require additional bowel care or have "normal bowel function"
  2. Known hypersensitivity to neostigmine or glycopyrrolate
  3. History of mechanical obstruction of the intestine or urinary tract.
  4. Myocardial infarction within less than 6 months of trial.
  5. Hemodynamic instability
  6. Potential for pregnancy. (Women who are sexually active and of childbearing potential (i.e. not surgically sterile or at least 2 year postmenopausal) must be have a negative serum pregnancy test and to have utilized one of the following methods of contraception prior to screening: barrier (condom, diaphragm with spermacide) intrauterine device, or tubal ligation beginning at least 30 days prior; hormonal (oral, injectable, transdermal, or implanted) beginning at least 3 months prior; or vasectomized partner for at least the prior 6 months. Subjects must agree to maintain these contraceptive methods through the completion of the study.)
  7. Lactating/nursing females
  8. Patients who develop significant bradycardia (HR<42 bpm) or other significant anticholinergic symptoms (e.g., severe cramps, dry mouth, etc.) any time during the study will be discontinued.
  9. Concurrent participation in other clinical trials (within 30 days).
  10. Use of concurrent medications that affect cardiac output (e.g. tricyclics, beta blockers, etc.)
  11. Fluctuating use of concurrent medications (should be stable for 3-4 weeks before and no changes anticipated throughout the study).
  12. History of reduced cardiac output (via history and ECG) in addition to myocardial infarction and hemodynamic instability.
  13. Concurrent history of peripheral vascular disease, kidney disease, etc.
  14. Asthma or other broncho-constrictive disorders.
  15. Hemoglobin level < 12 g/dL
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00855283

Contacts
Contact: Robert E Williams (718) 584-9000 ext 3126 robert.williams206485@va.gov

Locations
United States, New York
VA Medical Center, Bronx Recruiting
Bronx, New York, United States, 10468
Contact: Mark A Korsten, MD     718-584-9000 ext 6753     Mark.Korsten@va.gov    
Contact: William Bauman, MD         william.bauman@va.gov    
Principal Investigator: Mark A. Korsten, MD            
Sponsors and Collaborators
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Mark A. Korsten, MD VA Medical Center, Bronx
  More Information

Publications:
Bruninga K, Camilleri M. Colonic motility and tone after spinal cord and cauda equina injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 May;92(5):891-4.
Stiens SA, Bergman SB, Goetz LL. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury: clinical evaluation and rehabilitative management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Mar;78(3 Suppl):S86-102. Review.
Singas E, Lesser M, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, Almenoff PL. Airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in subjects with spinal cord injury. Chest. 1996 Oct;110(4):911-5.
Dicpinigaitis PV, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, Absgarten A, Almenoff PL. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness after cervical spinal cord injury. Chest. 1994 Apr;105(4):1073-6.
Geders JM, Gaing A, Bauman WA, Korsten MA. The effect of cisapride on segmental colonic transit time in patients with spinal cord injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Feb;90(2):285-9.
Keshavarzian A, Barnes WE, Bruninga K, Nemchausky B, Mermall H, Bushnell D. Delayed colonic transit in spinal cord-injured patients measured by indium-111 Amberlite scintigraphy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Aug;90(8):1295-300.
Grimm DR, DeMeersman RE, Garofano RP, Spungen AM, Bauman WA. Effect of provocative maneuvers on heart rate variability in subjects with quadriplegia. Am J Physiol. 1995 Jun;268(6 Pt 2):H2239-45.
Gore RM, Mintzer RA, Calenoff L. Gastrointestinal complications of spinal cord injury. Spine. 1981 Nov-Dec;6(6):538-44.
Child CS. Prevention of neostigmine-induced colonic activity. A comparison of atropine and glycopyrronium. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1083-5.
Hammond J, Wright D, Sale J. Pattern of change of bronchomotor tone following reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Comparison between atropine and glycopyrrolate. Br J Anaesth. 1983 Oct;55(10):955-9.
Wilkins JL, Hardcastle JD, Mann CV, Kaufman L. Effects of neostigmine and atropine on motor activity of ileum, colon, and rectum of anaesthetized subjects. Br Med J. 1970 Mar 28;1(5699):793-4. No abstract available.
Menardo G, Bausano G, Corazziari E, Fazio A, Marangi A, Genta V, Marenco G. Large-bowel transit in paraplegic patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 Dec;30(12):924-8.
Stone JM, Nino-Murcia M, Wolfe VA, Perkash I. Chronic gastrointestinal problems in spinal cord injury patients: a prospective analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Sep;85(9):1114-9.
Stone JM, Wolfe VA, Nino-Murcia M, Perkash I. Colostomy as treatment for complications of spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Jun;71(7):514-8.
Law NM, Bharucha AE, Undale AS, Zinsmeister AR. Cholinergic stimulation enhances colonic motor activity, transit, and sensation in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001 Nov;281(5):G1228-37.
Goldman MD. Clinical application of forced oscillation. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2001;14(5):341-50. Review.
Krogh K, Mosdal C, Laurberg S. Gastrointestinal and segmental colonic transit times in patients with acute and chronic spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 2000 Oct;38(10):615-21.
Grimm DR, Chandy D, Almenoff PL, Schilero G, Lesser M. Airway hyperreactivity in subjects with tetraplegia is associated with reduced baseline airway caliber. Chest. 2000 Nov;118(5):1397-404.
Vavilala MS, Lam AM. Neostigmine for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 18;341(21):1622; author reply 1623. No abstract available.

Responsible Party: Department of Veterans Affairs ( Korsten, Mark - Principal Investigator )
Study ID Numbers: B4162C-2, 2380-07-026
Study First Received: March 2, 2009
Last Updated: March 3, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00855283     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Muscarinic Antagonists
Cholinesterase Inhibitors
Oxymetazoline
Neurotransmitter Agents
Neostigmine
Cholinergic Antagonists
Phenylephrine
Glycopyrrolate
Adjuvants, Immunologic
Anesthetics
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Cholinergic Agents

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Parasympathomimetics
Neurotransmitter Agents
Neostigmine
Cholinergic Antagonists
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Enzyme Inhibitors
Cholinergic Agents
Pharmacologic Actions
Adjuvants, Anesthesia
Muscarinic Antagonists
Cholinesterase Inhibitors
Autonomic Agents
Glycopyrrolate
Therapeutic Uses
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Central Nervous System Agents

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 06, 2009