DEVELOPMENT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN UZBEKISTAN

 

 

 

MARCH 2006

Jahangir Kakharov, BISNIS Representative in Uzbekistan

 

 

INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2006. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES.

 

 

Market Overview

 

According to Environmental Performance Review of Uzbekistan conducted by United Nations Economic Commission for Europe in 2001, 160 sites for municipal solid waste disposal have been identified in Uzbekistan and there is some indication about their conditions. At many sites personnel are present and record the incoming refuse-collection vehicles. The Tashkent Scientific Research Institute, VODGEO, is one of the main sources of info about Uzbekistan waste management system. However, it should be noted, the waste database run by VODGEO includes only an estimated 5% of total industrial waste.

 

According to above mentioned UNECE review, waste generated per capita stands at 400 to 450 kg/year in cities and 40% less in rural areas. Other sources speak of an average of some 300 kg/capita, although with wide variations between different regions. The total municipal solid waste generation as well as per capita generation, have declined over the years in Uzbekistan. The reported per capita waste dropped from 375 kg in 1997 to 314 in 1998 and 240 in 1999. However, during the same period, the number of operational waste-collection vehicles declined as well and so did the number of trips to disposal sites. Therefore, the decline in registered waste doesn’t necessarily reflect a real decline in waste and not even a decline in waste disposal. The lower figures may be caused by a more efficient use of operational equipment, since owing to the method of data collection, carrying the same amount of waste with fewer trucks results in a lower amount of waste being registered.

 

UNECE concludes that during recent years municipal solid waste per capita has been in the order of 300 kg/year and that it is higher in urban areas and lower in rural areas. The figure mentioned is comparable with those in other countries in transition in both Central Asia and central and Eastern Europe.

 

The registration of industrial waste is based on reports from industries, but only waste classified as toxic waste has to be reported. Non-toxic industrial waste is not registered and no data are available. Although reporting of toxic industrial waste is mandatory in accordance with Governmental Regulation No. 22 of 18 November 1997 of the Ministry of Macroeconomics and Statistics, only a small percentage of industrial enterprises do indeed report their hazardous waste and, as a result, only a fraction of the real amount is registered.

 

Further, UNECE report points out that agricultural waste is dominated by cotton production, which generates more waste than the metallurgical, energy, engineering and chemical industries combined. For each kilogram of raw cotton more than a ton of cotton branch waste and cotton hulls is produced. However, in spite of the high amounts, it is not the biodegradable waste that should give cause for concern but the obsolete pesticides that have been generated by the agricultural sector over the years. Owners of the obsolete pesticides regard them as an urgent problem and have appealed to the State Committee for Nature Protection to solve it.

 

Based on a preliminary evaluation carried out in 1996, the State Committee for Nature Protection estimates that currently some 12,000 tons of obsolete pesticides are stored in various places in the country, including on farms and especially at former airstrips for pesticide-spraying airplanes. The stocks include pesticides that have been prohibited for use, including DDT and hexachlorine. The conditions under which these pesticides are stored are unsatisfactory. In areas neighboring such airfields and other pesticide storage sites high levels of soil contamination have been found with DDT concentrations twice or three times above the quality standard.

 

Medical waste is generated in hospitals and clinics, but also by doctors, dentists and veterinarians. According to the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) for the World Bank-funded waste management project in Tashkent, the capital generates 104,228 tons of medical waste a year (1999). Extrapolated to the entire republic, yearly medical waste generation should be in the order of one million tons. Experience shows that 80% or more of medical waste is comparable to municipal solid waste, while the remaining part should be considered as hazardous waste.

 

Only a few hospitals have special facilities to deal with their hazardous waste. The tuberculosis hospital in Tashkent is equipped with an incinerator, while other hospitals disinfect waste with chlorine. These are the only special measures taken. In general medical waste is managed together with municipal solid waste and used medical supplies such as syringes and infusion sets can therefore be found at municipal landfill sites.

 

UNECE report notes that a variety of other waste is produced, including construction and demolition waste, car wrecks, waste tyres, waste oils, PCB-containing waste, etc. Most is recycled or reused although all types of waste are disposed of as well. Car wrecks are for the most part used as secondary raw material in the steel industry and waste oils are recovered in accordance with the regulations of the State Committee for Oil Products. Used PCB-containing oil, so-called ‘transformer oil’, is recovered as well and sometimes used as engine oil in vehicles.

 

 

 

Market Trends

 

The State manages the collection and disposal of municipal solid waste. In most cities these services are carried out by local branches of the Agency for Communal Services or Uzkommunalhizmat. In Tashkent, they are the responsibility of the municipal enterprise “Mahsustrans”. Local and oblast authorities have a supervisory role. Waste producers in principle pay for the service but the amount is symbolic. Waste discarded by waste producers is simply collected and disposed of at city dumps. Recovery, reuse and recycling are in the main organized as a parallel system. This State-operated system is based on the buying of reusable or recyclable materials from waste producers. In addition to the State system, scavengers recover recyclables from discarded waste both at the collection point and at the dumpsites. Recyclable materials recovered from waste are eventually sold to industries, which use the waste fractions as secondary raw materials. In spite of the relative success of the recovery system, there are also less positive signs. The cost of collecting glass for recycling, for instance, is said to outweigh the financial benefits and glass production from virgin material is said to be cheaper. Although the recovery system is not market-driven and the State influences or even determines prices, the scavengers prove that there is a market for recyclable materials in Uzbekistan. Due to the lack of virgin materials, secondary raw materials are highly appreciated by industry. Metal, glass, paper and plastic factories all work below capacity and are able to absorb large amounts of secondary raw materials recovered from waste.

 

Industrial waste management is the responsibility of and mostly done by the waste producers, i.e. the industries. The larger industrial waste producers transport their own waste and operate their own disposal facilities. If at the disposal sites waste types and amounts are registered, this is done by the industries themselves. Most of the disposal sites are reported to be lined with concrete or with a double lining system of concrete on top of a bentonite lining.

UNECE review draws attention to the fact that most dump sites in Uzbekistan are staffed. About half the sites are licensed; the other half should be regarded as illegal. Eighty per cent of the sites is said to be full and should be closed. Most dumps have been established without a proper site selection process. Disposal facilities other than dumps and landfills are rare in Uzbekistan. The tuberculosis hospital in Tashkent is equipped with an incinerator, and in Navoi some industrial waste is incinerated by the Navoiazot factory. Alternatives to dedicated incinerators are not used. Cement kilns, which many countries use for the destruction of hazardous wastes and used car tyres, play no role in waste disposal in Uzbekistan. Some decades ago a composting plant operated for a while but as its end products were contaminated, the plant was closed soon after construction.

 

The institution responsible for policy development for waste management is the State Committee for Nature Protection or Goskompriroda. The State Committee develops legal and methodical documents and is responsible for the control and gathering of data on the generation and disposal of waste, for the inventory of waste disposal sites and for the collection of the fiscal fee for waste disposal. The control and inspection of waste utilization are the responsibility of the Department for Water and Soil Resources. Utilization of medical waste is the responsibility of the Ministry of Health.

 

 

 

Commercial Opportunities

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) together with the World Bank financed $46 million Tashkent Solid Waste Management Project. This project is about to be completed. Tashkent's 2.3 million residents can now appreciate cleaner surroundings following this project, provided in 1998, to improve the city's waste management system. The project became the EBRD's first investment in municipality infrastructure in Uzbekistan.

The loan has financed the renewal of the waste collection vehicle fleet; construction of four transfer stations; purchase of landfill equipment, including bio-medical waste treatment equipment; and the environmental rehabilitation of one landfill and the closure of another.

The investment has also enabled institution building, with the EBRD attracting donor funds from the Japanese government and EC TACIS programme, and further private sector participation in infrastructure development. The investment project has already resulted in significant environmental and public health and safety improvements. It has also helped the City to develop a strategic municipal solid waste management plan.

A new project on solid waste management (Bukhara and Samarkand Solid Waste Management Project) was in the World Bank pipeline at the time when this report was being prepared.

 

Below is a brief info about this project:

 

Project Name

Bukhara Samarkand Solid Waste Management Project

Region

EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA

Sector

Solid Waste Management (100%)

Project ID

P095263

Borrower(s)

GOVERNMENT OF UZBEKISTAN

Implementing Agency

 

Environment Category

TBD (to be determined)

Date PID Prepared

October 26, 2005

Estimated Date of Appraisal Authorization

May 29, 2006

Estimated Date of Board Approval

September 28, 2006

 

However, recently the Bank made the following announcement:

“In pursuit of its engagement in Uzbekistan, the World Bank will seek to develop a new strategy focused on technical assistance, advisory services, and research activities, but without new lending. The Bank’s approach stems from concern that the resources of the International Development Association—the Bank’s concessional lending facility—are increasingly constrained and should be used in countries where the Bank can be confident that IDA-financed programs will have the greatest impact.

The World Bank will maintain its focus on alleviating poverty in Uzbekistan by continuing to engage with the authorities on governance and economic recovery, and by reaching out to civil society.  Implementation of the 7 projects now underway will continue, and the Bank also intends to proceed with a range of analytical, capacity building and technical assistance services.  If the government wishes, the Bank will prepare and finance projects that have a 'global public good' dimension such as Avian Flu.

The next step is for the proposed strategy, which has yet to be fully developed, to be discussed with the authorities in Tashkent and members of the World Bank’s Board of Executive Directors.”

Contact person for this project is:

 

Janis D. Bernstein

Sr. Environmental Spec.

Tel: (202) 473-3947

Fax: (202) 614-0645

Email: Jbernstein@worldbank.org

 

 

Additional Information:

 

For further information about this report, you can contact

 

BISNIS/U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service in Uzbekistan:

Mr. Jahangir Kakharov

BISNIS Representative in Uzbekistan

1, Khodjaev Street, Uzbekistan

Banking Association Building, 13th floor

Phone: + 998 71 138 69 76

Fax: + 998 71 138 69 77

E-mail: bisnis.tashkent@bcc.com.uz

URL: www.bisnis.doc.gov

URL: www.export.gov