skip navigation
Text Size small medium large  

skip navigation
Electric
Hydropower
Annual Charges
Safety and Inspections
Environment
Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Initial Consultation Contact List
Third-Party Contractors
Industry Activities
General Information
Gas
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Oil
 
 


Industries

Hydropower - Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
    Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Big Creek Projects (Project Nos. 120, 67, 2175, and 2085)
    Issued: March 13, 2009

    Commission staff prepared a final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the relicensing of four existing hydroelectric projects that are part of Southern California Edison’s (SCE’s) 865-megawatt (MW) Big Creek Project. The Big Creek Projects analyzed in the document are located in the Upper San Joaquin River Watershed, in Fresno and Madera Counties, California.

    SCE filed a license application with the Commission for the Mammoth Pool Project on November 29, 2005 and filed applications for the other three projects on February 23, 2007. The projects occupy a total of about 6,870 acres of federal land administered by the Forest Service in Sierra National Forest.

    SCE filed a comprehensive Offer of Settlement in February 2007 that set the terms of their proposed action. The Settlement Agreement includes a wide range of measures to enhance, mitigate and protect the resources affected by the continued operation of the Projects. Included are measures to raise instream flow releases from several dams and diversions, provide channel riparian maintenance flows, provide pre-spill whitewater flow releases, and eliminate some flow diversions through diversion decommissioning. In addition, SCE proposes to implement plans and monitoring to manage large woody debris, sediment, bald eagles, valley elderberry beetles and its habitat, vegetation and noxious weeds, cultural resources, visual resources, transportation, and recreation. The Recreation Management Plan provides funds to rehabilitate and build new recreation facilities and provide information to the public regarding project-related recreation.

    In the final EIS, Commission staff recommends the staff alternative, which consists of the proposed action, with some recommended changes to the proposed settlement articles.

 




Updated: March 13, 2009